@jimijamesh This came out in 97 but the rulesof science have not changed since then. If you want something more recent I suggest...Deconstructing the Myth of Aids...Aids inc....or the most recent one 2009...House of Numbers
@mykoolaidtastesfunny It is true that this film was released in 1997, and it you notice, it really doesn't even deal with the question about HIV isolation, which was pretty new at that time. But virtually all of the 10 scientific reasons why HIV (or what is called HIV) can NOT cause AIDS are still valid and even confirmed by ongoing data. The film predicted that AIDS was in decline and that the new protease inhibitors would lead to serious side effects, and the failure of the "Viral Load" hype.
@WillSee11 True. They may also have been trying to keep it as simple as possible for non-scientists. Gallo's fraud had already come to light by the time this was made but maybe they thought getting into isolation protocols was too much. The sign of a good theory in science is its ability to make accurate predictions about future events and all of the drug/environment hypothesis's predictions have come true.
@eknsrzmz 1997 and Duesberg has been proven correct. The hetero aids epideic was cancelled over 2 years ago by the World Health Organization. The syndrome Gallo's crap antibody tsts were SUPPOSED to predict did not spread into the general population. Past tense.
google....THERE WILL BE NO HETEROSEXUAL AIDS EPIDEMIC EXPERTS ADMIT
HIV test only looks for raised levels of anti-bodies, not HIV.
I've known people who were diagnosed with the so-called, deadly HIV virus, then years later another "test" revealed they mysteriously no longer have HIV, thus the HIV/AIDS paradigm (that's what it is, a belief) is a fraud.
More people are discovering that "AIDS" is caused by the anti-retro virals & other poisons given to those poor souls who trusted an HIV test.
@4ezMoney HIV test looks for antibodies just like hmm.. let's see Herpes tests, Hep C, etc etc. If that proves inconclusive then PCR can be used to culture the virus and detect it directly just like the same process used to analyze human DNA. FACT.
@SkeksisRule Those tests do NOT hold up in court. FACT I also have the direct links to the test kit disclaimers on my channel
PCR disclaimer....The ... AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, v1.5 is.......NOT......... intended to be used as a screening test for blood or blood products for the presence of HIV-1 or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV-1 infection.
Aids isn't the biggest blunder of the 20 century. Aids is only a small part of the health care monopoly. Vaccination, oncology, psychiatry and other medical strains and procedures are even worse. The less you encounter doctors the better.
Bill Maher said it nicely: " The big pharma doesn't want healthy people, it also doesn't want dead people, the healthy mix is in between, somewhere were your not healthy but still not dead."
The greatest medical scientific blunder of the 20th century? I would say AIDS is a close second to the cult of vaccination.
Conquered polio? Polio is another lie that was never transmitted by a virus but by contaminated food and milk. The vaccine caused more cases than it ever supposedly prevented. Wake up sheep.
well salk did NOT cure polio with his vaccine.... THAT in itself is worthy of an entire documentary. Vaccines cause as many more issues/diseases/disorders than they ever 'prevented'.........
90 % of mainstream medicine is intentional sick care...
it is a huge malthusian intend fraud. We get sick and go down hill...as perscribed!
This is stupid.
wtfsob123456 3 months ago
alien proteins can also weaken the immune system (anal sex)
mebossyounothing 6 months ago
how old is this?
jimijamesh 1 year ago
@jimijamesh This came out in 97 but the rulesof science have not changed since then. If you want something more recent I suggest...Deconstructing the Myth of Aids...Aids inc....or the most recent one 2009...House of Numbers
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
@mykoolaidtastesfunny It is true that this film was released in 1997, and it you notice, it really doesn't even deal with the question about HIV isolation, which was pretty new at that time. But virtually all of the 10 scientific reasons why HIV (or what is called HIV) can NOT cause AIDS are still valid and even confirmed by ongoing data. The film predicted that AIDS was in decline and that the new protease inhibitors would lead to serious side effects, and the failure of the "Viral Load" hype.
WillSee11 1 year ago
@WillSee11 True. They may also have been trying to keep it as simple as possible for non-scientists. Gallo's fraud had already come to light by the time this was made but maybe they thought getting into isolation protocols was too much. The sign of a good theory in science is its ability to make accurate predictions about future events and all of the drug/environment hypothesis's predictions have come true.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
when was this video made?
eknsrzmz 1 year ago
@eknsrzmz 1997 and Duesberg has been proven correct. The hetero aids epideic was cancelled over 2 years ago by the World Health Organization. The syndrome Gallo's crap antibody tsts were SUPPOSED to predict did not spread into the general population. Past tense.
google....THERE WILL BE NO HETEROSEXUAL AIDS EPIDEMIC EXPERTS ADMIT
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 year ago
Gee let me think...
uhh, no!
HIV test only looks for raised levels of anti-bodies, not HIV.
I've known people who were diagnosed with the so-called, deadly HIV virus, then years later another "test" revealed they mysteriously no longer have HIV, thus the HIV/AIDS paradigm (that's what it is, a belief) is a fraud.
More people are discovering that "AIDS" is caused by the anti-retro virals & other poisons given to those poor souls who trusted an HIV test.
You should be pissed.
4ezMoney 1 year ago 2
@4ezMoney HIV test looks for antibodies just like hmm.. let's see Herpes tests, Hep C, etc etc. If that proves inconclusive then PCR can be used to culture the virus and detect it directly just like the same process used to analyze human DNA. FACT.
SkeksisRule 6 days ago
@SkeksisRule Those tests do NOT hold up in court. FACT I also have the direct links to the test kit disclaimers on my channel
PCR disclaimer....The ... AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, v1.5 is.......NOT......... intended to be used as a screening test for blood or blood products for the presence of HIV-1 or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV-1 infection.
FACT
mykoolaidtastesfunny 6 minutes ago
Aids isn't the biggest blunder of the 20 century. Aids is only a small part of the health care monopoly. Vaccination, oncology, psychiatry and other medical strains and procedures are even worse. The less you encounter doctors the better.
Bill Maher said it nicely: " The big pharma doesn't want healthy people, it also doesn't want dead people, the healthy mix is in between, somewhere were your not healthy but still not dead."
TheMehakarp 1 year ago
The greatest medical scientific blunder of the 20th century? I would say AIDS is a close second to the cult of vaccination.
Conquered polio? Polio is another lie that was never transmitted by a virus but by contaminated food and milk. The vaccine caused more cases than it ever supposedly prevented. Wake up sheep.
FynFlyte 1 year ago
@FynFlyte
"Polio is another lie that was never transmitted by a virus but by contaminated food and milk"
Contaminated with what?
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 year ago
@MomoTheBellyDancer By bullshit. Just like this video.
SkeksisRule 6 days ago
well salk did NOT cure polio with his vaccine.... THAT in itself is worthy of an entire documentary. Vaccines cause as many more issues/diseases/disorders than they ever 'prevented'.........
90 % of mainstream medicine is intentional sick care...
it is a huge malthusian intend fraud. We get sick and go down hill...as perscribed!
unsheepled 1 year ago
it's for sure not a blunder, it's a setup
604ToKaY 2 years ago 13
Viral engineering wasn't around in the 30's.
FeelOfFriction 2 years ago