The USSR wasn't a 'Republic' it was 'Republics.' Plural because the USSR was the result of a merger of several Republics (semantics, I know), and it was a Republic because at least initially, that's what it was before morphing into a dictatorship. Also, while the party in power was the Communist Party, the USSR was a Socialist state, not a Communist state.
Is it any wonder why Fox News is the #1 rated cable news network on the air? It's because they market themselves directly to the idiots, of which we all know there are many!
We are talking about people who have been made to believe that MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, BBC, Time magazine, the Huffington Post, the New York Times, history, facts, science and reality ALL have a hostile "liberal bias".
This is like believing the word of 1 man (the loudest) against that of 10 others in the same room.
I have always politically been a moderate as such i watch all types of news both fox, cnn, abc, I perceive a conservative bias from fox and a liberal bias from the rest. I would like to point out: some of the "News" shows pointed out in this are not news reporting shows nor does fox claim that they are, they are News Analyst shows which is a fancy way of saying, here is the news here is my opinion of it, fairly similar to what John Stewart or Bill Maher. Although fox say it straight(comically)
I was a firefighter and would see first hand what happened at an incident. Then I would see the 11:00 o'clock news and see what the news people said about it. Then I would wonder, If they are screwing this up so bad, how do we know what FOX is reporting about the world is the truth.
Fair and Balanced is the stupidist thing they can claim. They won't report something unless someone is bitching.
AND they are so stupid they will report anything that is told to them.
America is both a democracy and a republic. We are a republic because we do not have a hereditary monarch. We are also a representative democracy because the people have a voice in how the government is run through elected representatives. The UK is a democracy, but it is not a republic. The former Soviet Union was a republic, but not a democracy.
@dmnemaine the former Soviet Union was not a Republic. A Republic is classified by representation of the citizenry. Just because the word Republic was in its name doesn't mean it is. The Soviet Union was a Communist state through and through. And the UK is a monarchy but it is closer to a Republic than a Democracy because it had representation but not direct election of its leaders. You obviously have no idea how governments are classified.
If Fox News is "fair and balenced" then Creationists will admit their mistakes honestly, without trying to pin the blame on someone else or backing up further and distorting their own message.
It's quite shocking how powerful the Murdoch Empire really is. Over here in the UK, his outlet, The Sun, pretty much controls elections, to the point they can publish a headline on election day and change the result completely from those predicted (see 1992 UK elections).
It begins with being asked to deactivate your intellect, so you can believe in a deity and holy texts. Deactivating your intellect to such a degree, that you are asked to have "faith" in place of rationale. My problem with the whole thing is, where do you STOP circumventing your intellect and rationale? People have become so used to believing what they have been told in the name of god, that they are willing to accept ANYTHING, even if it's a lie, because the truth is alien and inconvenient.
I live outside the US and I don't think I have ever heard anyone talk in favour Fox News in fact I don't think I have ever heard as much as a single positive thing about Fox News. How many Americans actually watch Fox News as their daily source of news?
@THC1989 You hear it now: I'm a CANADIAN citizen that watches ONLY FOX NEWS, day in and day out, the only TV news outlet I trust for fair, balance and unafraid news. And FOX NEWS is also the most watched CABLE TV outlet in America and Canada, so my dear ATHEIST "partner" try to get your facts right before engaging in such biased comments.
@401RoadWarrior Stating that I had never heard anyone talk in positive terms about Fox News is not biased but simply a statement, you have corrected me so that I no know of one. Please read what people write before you make an answer so that you are able to make an informed answer based on what is actually said rather then what you would like it to say. Thank you.
@THC1989 I have no idea what you're trying to say, but regardless FNC is the MOST WATCHED cable tv channel in USA & CDA, that's a fact and in no way my "right-wing" imagination.
@401RoadWarrior I'm simply saying that you didn't actually read the originally message that I wrote and so what you responded seemed rather misplaced. Why my standpoint as an atheist should in any way be relevant for this discussion eludes me. Unless you seem to think that you need to be religious to appreciate Fox News it in witch case they can hardly be called balanced.
I don't know of anyone who like FNC, (in your country)
401RoadWarrior did not refer to this statement in any way, period.
And you asked:
How much people watch FNC in North America?
Answer: FNC is the most watched cable TV in the US and Canada.
Asking this question you seemed to assume that FNC is not widely watched by Americans and Canadians, which leads to a conclusion that you do not have any idea of North American values.
@Xjarq Your assumptions are really not relevant what is relevant is really is what I wrote. My statement wasn't "shit" as you put it but based on what I've actually observed from my place in the world, whenever fox is mentioned it's seems to be with bit of irony.
If you are going to quote me at least have the respect to quote me correctly.
@Xjarq (continued) Stating that it is the most viewed cable TV doesn't really tell how many people actually watch it without accounting for how widespread cable TV is among these populations. Your "conclusion" doesn't seem to be based on arguments unless you think this is a valid argumentation:
You didn't know Fox News is widely watched cable TV = you don't understand US values.
I paraphrased your comment just to make it short, what's wrong with that?
If my opinion ("FNC is the most watched TV in NA") doesn't convince you, I suggest looking for the numbers on google.
ps. I don't wanna be cheeky but PLEASE try to change your writing style to make it less complicated for me to read. Just try being less "scientific". I know your not English (me too) but it can really discourage people to start a discussion with you.
Why is it that in every break room in every Gov't bldg., corporate center, doctor's office, Jiffy Lube shop, or what have you I go into, the TV is tuned to FOX News and I can't find the damned remote?!
if you don't like Fox, then don't watch it, I'm sure you can get your fix of liberal left wing bullshit at NPR and MSNBC. You guys just can't deal with anyone who disagrees with you.
@marcemelliza - we don't mean to bark at you like utoob kids or football fans of opposing teams - just want to clear something up. U typed, "then don't watch it". Yet still the facts are up there that fox lies and distorts & sways in favour of their corp. friend$. Now that is very wrong. It is horrible not just for our country but for every country. Now, if you saw someone being hurt, swindled, etc.. - do you walk away and not watch? Or do you do something about it?
@marcemelliza We can't deal with anyone who lies and presents it as truth. A group who does all it can to instill fear and prejudice in the people of this country, and does it's very best to keep the populace ignorant of the true reality of the world. They need to be called out on what they do at every turn until they stop presenting themselves as NEWS.
@DonExodus2 I think the conclusions you draw from the data are too strong. To actually verify that you get "dumber" from watching Fox news you need to see what happens when someone switches from another news source to fox news. Not just study someone who has always watched fox. As it is now whe can't separate cause and correlation.
The problem here is, Alot of people dont like Fox, but they dont give a shit, because people will tune in either way. As longs as they sell ad space and make money off of the news; which is a business btw. You can spend all day knocking them for being wrong which i do agree they are one sided.
They want to go against the grain, thats why they have pundits like hannity, oreilly, colmes etc etc. With all of the arguments between guests and them.
"Does Fox News, according to many trusted sources, perform virgins slaughters and child molestation before their daily prayer to Satan? I'm not saying they do this. I'm just asking questions!"
Yet Fox has also shown numerous points about the secrecies of our government that no other channel has even muttered. Fox was the one and only channel exposing the backgrounds of Obama's cabinet, like the gay child-molesterer in charge of education.
Nice video. Did you notice, though, that even when it is PROVEN how they purposely misinform their audience, their fans STILL stick up for them because they "dare to air conservative viewpoints" & they have good ratings. So strange.
The purpose of the news depends on who it is owned by. The purpose of the news then entirely lies in justifying the interests of the organisation that owns it.
If it is in my interest to use scare tactics for people to buy my product X, then I will go ahead and "prove" that eggs are not edible and cause serious injury to health.
Don't trust all studies, some get "brought" if you get my drift.
As it goes, Fox News has shown unreserved bias towards the republicans. Just watch some of Liberal Viewer's videos to see plain examples of Fox saying only bad things about Democrats and good about republicans. They don't even accept the possibility that Obama's economical strategy might have ended the recession.
No, I am going to dismiss the UCLA/Stanford study because it doesn't match the evidence... what is easily shown in Liberal Viewer's videos.
Also the recession isn't still going on, the after effect of the recession are still going on, the end of recession and full economical recovery are different things, however the USA economy has been in incline since Obama toke office and is now the fastest growing year in the American economy of any president's 1st year since WWII.
The study provides evidence. You're dismissing it because it contradicts your pre-made conclusion.
Yes, the recession is still going on. Obama's big stimulus package did nothing but protect government jobs. Your stat about it being the fastest growing year is hilarious. We have double-digit employment, and it's predicted to continue. The government itself is saying the economy will stay in the dumps.
No, I am not an Obama fanboy, you are just an Obama hater.
I have read up on the report, and it's based not on the center, but in comparison to the average voters vote.... that is a massively different value when you consider that USA has a traditional right wing favoritism. This would mean actually positions further to the left then the average vote would be near to the center then those of the same proportion to the right.
You will make any crazy leap to justify your conclusions. Please, continue to cover your eyes and enjoy your record-high deficit since Obama thinks deficit spending is how you stimulate an economy. Democrats recently raised the debt limit yet again!
My Conclusions are based on watching fox news and seeing just how extremely biased it is, I can't admit to having seem the other channels to much, I live in the UK and am more likely to watch BBC then anything else. However this doesn't distract from the fact there are many glaring problems with Fox News and it's often ignorance spreading bias.
Obama's policies are likely the cause of recovery in the economy (something you don't even seem to be aware of)
but Fox wouldn't even admit that, that could have been a possibility. They said at best it was nothing more then a reaction against his policies what made no sense but they still said it anyway.
The fact that you have failed to show knowledge about the recovery in the economy makes me wonder if you are one of those Fox Viewers that this report is actually on about.
No, your conclusions are based on your personal biases, and when presented with a neutral study, you invent reasons to dismiss it.
If Obama's policies caused recovery, why has the unemployment rate remained the same while our deficit has exploded in size? Deficit spending doesn't stimulate an economy. I don't know where you're getting your facts from.
Any study based on "bias" can not be free from bias. The study you are on about was not about bias away from the neutral view point but bias in comparison to the average US voter. And we already know the average US voter votes generally to the right.
(Un)employment is not directly proportional to the economy, as I said we are still feeling the after effects, soon as companies start to get ready to expand again, they will start hiring more people again, they won't do that just off the bat tho.
You're so desperate to avoid acknowledging a neutral story or the failure of the Obama administration to address the economic recession. Obama's given us a record deficit...we'll have to pay it.
Nope, not really desperate, I just look things up, and I find flaws in things that don't appear to fit the evidence, what you claim that fox new is the least bias news channel surely got that going, then I found out the study was based on the average voter and not the politically neutral view point. More so meta research has found out that overall there is a neutrality in media bias so naturally there must be something to the right evening that out... and there isn't much more right then fox.
And no, Obama didn't give you the record Deficit, that was Bush, he moved over 8 years from a 2 billion dollar security to a 3 trillion dollar deficit. If you think Obama is responsible for that, you are clearly misguided. Under Obama it has even been acknowledge by fox news that is certainly is the fastest growing economical first year of any US president since WWII, they just don't acknowledge that he is responsible for that growth, when he is almost certainly responsible for it.
So yeah, stop being a bush and republican fanboy, Mccain wanted to further the same economical policies that got you into the problem in the first place, Sarah Palin ain't got a brain cell in her head and Science disproved creationism a very long time ago.
And at last, you run out of straws and finally grasp for the typical "bush and republican fanboy" crap, even though I'm not a Republican. What does McCain or Palin have to do with this? This discussion is about Obama and the Democrats' failure.
When you actually come back with some counterarguments to refute a single thing I've said, let me know. Otherwise, I completely dismantled everything you've thrown at me...and it was easy.
Yes, Obama did give us a record deficit. You need to take a look at how much the deficit increased UNDER OBAMA ALONE. The fastest growing economic first year? Completely bogus claim that's already been dissected elsewhere. You're just parroting talking points now.
Bonchbonch, you are definitely the kind of person that fox news thrives on, you believe in disinformation and do not understand any of the topic that is being talked about. I would say perhaps you do not understand simple facts. Fox News could NOT deny that the economy had increased... they ADMITTED it, they just couldn't admit it was because of Obama... so if fox news can't dissect it and they hate Obama, why do you think other sources successfully could?
I don't even watch Fox News. You are completely unable to refute any facts, so you just fall back on trying to stereotype me. You've really run out of steam here.
Not really, I suspect what I have said is closer to the truth then you would admit. And some of what I have said is based on fact, nothing I have seen that you have said has any factual or truthful evidence behind it what so ever.
I even found a massively glaring hole in the one piece you did rely on the Stanford Study that it tried to take the position of not the center position but simply the position of the average American voter on how it based figure.
Given that there have been many other studies that have taken the center position and mega reports, they generally find media bais is equaled out across the board.
None of these reports were based on how truthful or reliable sources of the news channels actually were, what a lot of people are saying is Fox News generally makes a lot of stuff up and declares it's opinions as facts and as such their viewers are full of much more misconceptions.
So no, with these points standing still, I don't have to make any more steam, the steam I already have for these will get me to my intended destination. But if you must attempt to use this latest point, where did I actually say you watched fox news? I said you were the type fox news thrives on, a contrastingly different statement, this doesn't imply you actually watch fox news.
You can suspect all you want. I'm the one providing neutral studies, and you're the one who dismisses them because you don't like their conclusions. Your refutal of the study is ludicrous and non-scientific.
You need to believe Fox News is some evil entity because you're biased. You need an us vs. them battle. It doesn't bother you that the entire rest of the media leans left, based on multiple studies. To you, the ends justify the means.
As I said, it's not the conclusion I am not happy with to start with it's the very basis under what it was done under, it was a study compared to average Joe American, not to the neutral point. As I have said there have been other studies, heck even Wikipedia has links to many other studies that show massively different results.
And no, I don't need to believe Fox News is evil, Evil is just a concept that doesn't really have meaning. However I have cited a user who has displayed MANY...
examples of Fox News purposefully displaying misinformation for their own political agenda! LiberalViewer has many such examples.... in the hundreds... possibly even thousands now.
We've already covered this. You're flat-out wrong about the study. Contrary to your claim, other media studies confirm the results. As I said, you're just biased. You will never acknowledge any point that might damage your side, because you're involved in a schoolyard us vs. them fight between liberals and conservatives.
Look at how your arguments have fallen apart here. It's hilarious.
As I say again NO IT'S YOU THAT IS WRONG? Are you outright retarded on this issue? oh no a personal attack? that shows I can't argue? Oh no right, you still can not show any such examples that it is not the case that the Stanford Report didn't do as I have said, because let's admit it, you just saw the results, saw what you wanted and are posting this here! You are the hilarious one, in that you are hilariously wrong.
If you don't get my previous response, I am essentially saying, literally all you have done is go "media study", "media study", "media study". The one criticism I found of it you can't even dispel and I have given other examples showing that Fox news isn't just biased, it's spreading misinformation, in fact Fox News admits it is biased and claims that it is better then the rest because it admits it, saying BBC News sucks for being left biased (what isn't true) and all that crud.
And this is where you fall apart. Your emotional rage is running so high that you can't even punctuate or capitalize properly. You're actually trying to argue that a UCLA/Stanford media study is flawed because you don't like its conclusion.
I don't know if you make it a habit of criticizing academic experts who do studies, but I suggest not flying into a blind rage whenever you encounter a study that contradicts your pre-drawn conclusions. You'll thank me someday.
And just because you like it's conclusion means it isn't flawed? I have pointed out the flaw, you have yet again failed to say why this isn't a flaw or why this is wrong, you skip around the issue as this is why you fall apart.
However punctuation or capitalize, I have Developmental Dyspraxia you tard, you just did the very say thing you said I did, you stereotyped my behavior when in fact it's due to something completely different. It is you who falls apart here.
why are you even wasting your time? bonchbonch is an idiot, case closed... go read a book or something, much more productive things to do than try to persuade an idiot that he's an idiot.
Studies show that they're not. You simply don't like them because they dare to air conservative viewpoints on the same level as liberal ones, unlike the rest of the media.
I didn't "make shit up." You obviously haven't even read the conversation and are dismissing anything I say right from the start because you're biased and can't see outside your own worldview.
Why the hostility when I ask for the title of this study? Why not simply provide the source and make me shut up? Your reaction makes me you only have the one methodologically flawed study by the UCLA, and these "other studies" you refer to are as of yet unnamed.
What hostility? I simply responded to you after you claimed I "made shit up." The UCLA-Stanford study is freely available, and I suggest you Google for it and the rest. It's common knowledge that the mainstream media leans left.
How...exactly....does one make a study on bias? (Also, if you believe that...seriously...wow.) Don't get me wrong, all news channels I've seen are biased.
Uh, it's not just one study. And why wouldn't you believe that study? The answer is that you don't like it's conclusion, so you're dismissing it from the start. Meanwhile, it's common knowledge that the mainstream media leans left.
Its a common misconception. News casters surveyed tend to lean left on social issues and are to the right on fiscal issues. But the vast majority of editors are left leaning.
@khatool It might be true that all American news networks have some form of bias, I don't know, I don't watch every 24 hour news network all day long, however, in any statistical set, most data points differ from the norm one way from the other.
@dunnyhf Sure every network may have some bias. But, no network is as biased as often and onesided as Fox News. All of the "mistakes" that Fox news makes helps the Republicans/Conservatives /or hurt Liberals/Democrats.
@khatool A bias occurs when something infuences the results, forcing the data to propagate a much larger number of outliers (normally, about 95% of data would be within two standard deviations, outliers are results that is unexpected in relation to the rest of the data). The bias of other news networks are relatively low, and can be ignored as it is expected.
@khatool According to that survey, Fox had a high level of deliberate misinformation, making those who watch it see the world through their eyes, so they would support the war, or whatever Fox wanted.
I won't be shocked if Fox said that people can fly by flapping their arms hard enough, the number of deaths by falling would skyrocket.
@dekotable And MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Huffington Post, and New York Post is not biased? You have one news organization (FOX) out of thousands that represent the right and you want them shut down and silenced. The only time you support the 1st ammendment is when it can be used to spread the leftist agenda. Nice!
I neither like or dislike its conclusion--I don't form my worldview based on emotions, like you. Again, your claim of a flaw is invalid. Finding out you're mentally retarded just solidifies my other points about your lack of reasoning.
These studies sound very interesting. Please give me more information about them and tell me what they are called. i would like to study the studies for myself.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I hate videos like this. You don't have to pursuade people to think what you think. That what makes the world great. What makes you different from Fox news for making poeple think what you want them to think. The only difference between you and Fox news is that they are more popular and people might blame them because they have trusted them. I hate Fox news to because they are soooooo 1 sided but thats how news in the 21st century work. I'm sorry.
What liberals have missed is properly "framing" Fox News as an issue. Everyone should read George Lakoff's book called "Don't Think of an Elephant."
All liberals now repeat after me.
"Fox News and republican party."
Say it a thousand times. Say it til you're blue in the face. Every time you mention Fox call them, "Fox News and republican party." Every time you mention the republican party call them "Fox News and republican party."
DO NOT DEVIATE! Tell all your friends. Please repost.
On the BBC World Service (12 Jan 2010), Rupert Murdoch's SON said both he and his father are ashamed of FOX, and moves are being made to cleaen up their act.
this video is great, I love to watch Bill argue and give everyone a "fair chance" to respond while he's screaming over the top of their say. foxnews is hilarious to me, but remember you HAVE to be a good old christian conservative to have any dignity in this world! ...not
Don't people have enough selfrespect not to watch this crap and consider it news? Some people brag about being the most misinformed mistaken morons in the USA. When Fox started organizing Tea Bag protests, producing and directing them as news didn't it make you want to vomit? How can these morons watch this shit and pretend it's news? It's like taking lessons on how to be an idiot.
Even abroad (I'm from the Netherlands, but I know for a fact that it is the same in Germany) Fox News is notorious for its non-informative propaganda. It is widely considered a cancerous growth in journalism and we over here compare it to WW2 nazi propaganda or chinese and north-korean propaganda. It is very disconcerting to know that many Americans are influenced by filth like this.
It sucks that this virus has spread there as well. I'm in the think of it here in the bible-belt and I don't see any end in sight. The more informed I become the more people I meet that are not.
I'll second that! I'm from France and I know that Fox news is very manipulative and biased. This was particularly flagrant after 9/11 and during the presidential campaign where they were almost openly begging viewers to vote for McCain. Now it seems they're taking great pleasure in their new sport "Obama-bashing"! And on a personal note, I'll add that Bill O'Reilly is a twat.
i love france, germany and the netherlands ( i'm in the uk) and having visited paris and amsterdam i feel my country has much to learn from france and the netherlands in terms of public services
i felt annoyed when hannity said obama wanted "a united states of france" what? a nation with the best healthcare in the world? a nation who stands against a stupid and pointless war? a country were more kids are enrolled into school than in the us?
To have my dad quote O'Reilly verbatim is sickening, and to get into an arguement with a conservative to have him start yelling "THIS IS THE NO SPIN ZONE" at me is....just depressing.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Now that all the mainstream media, CNN, and especially msnbc are all nothing more than state run media outlets, Fox is the only source of objective news. Of course that wAS TRUE BEFORE OBAMA HOODWINKED THE REST OF THE PRESS..
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You're an idiot. When Bush was in - Fox was "a mouthpiece for the administration" according to dim wits like you. Now that Obama in in, who has taken that role?
Oh, okay. Left and right, up and down...right and wrong. You are so right, now I have seen the light. Your attempt to relegate me to play your stupid game of partisan politics will fail. Goodbye tard, forgive the air you breathe.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You're right - name calling is stupid, but applying a descriptor such as "idiot" to someone who has earned the title is not "name calling." I will say again, if you rely solely upon msnbc, cnn, and the other Obama media outlets for your information, you will only be getting ONE SIDE of any issue - good riddance sir..........
some sweet info here
sprattysy 1 week ago
some sweet info here
willbirful 1 week ago
what song is this
inadaizz 4 months ago
The USSR wasn't a 'Republic' it was 'Republics.' Plural because the USSR was the result of a merger of several Republics (semantics, I know), and it was a Republic because at least initially, that's what it was before morphing into a dictatorship. Also, while the party in power was the Communist Party, the USSR was a Socialist state, not a Communist state.
LordRunty 4 months ago
Is it any wonder why Fox News is the #1 rated cable news network on the air? It's because they market themselves directly to the idiots, of which we all know there are many!
We are talking about people who have been made to believe that MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, BBC, Time magazine, the Huffington Post, the New York Times, history, facts, science and reality ALL have a hostile "liberal bias".
This is like believing the word of 1 man (the loudest) against that of 10 others in the same room.
EppurSiMuove419 6 months ago
Comment removed
EppurSiMuove419 6 months ago
Who's bright idea was it to make news a business again?
Sharagran 8 months ago
@Sharagran
Probably the same people who think it's a good idea to make public education a business.
TheZooCrew 8 months ago
reverse psychology is a bitch to stupid people, and faux news is the pimp that controls it
Netruic 8 months ago
I have always politically been a moderate as such i watch all types of news both fox, cnn, abc, I perceive a conservative bias from fox and a liberal bias from the rest. I would like to point out: some of the "News" shows pointed out in this are not news reporting shows nor does fox claim that they are, they are News Analyst shows which is a fancy way of saying, here is the news here is my opinion of it, fairly similar to what John Stewart or Bill Maher. Although fox say it straight(comically)
swoop2004 9 months ago
Problem is that even if Fox changed their slogan to "Biased and Deceptive", all of their viewers would probably keep watching.
GnarlyNewEngland 9 months ago
I was a firefighter and would see first hand what happened at an incident. Then I would see the 11:00 o'clock news and see what the news people said about it. Then I would wonder, If they are screwing this up so bad, how do we know what FOX is reporting about the world is the truth.
Fair and Balanced is the stupidist thing they can claim. They won't report something unless someone is bitching.
AND they are so stupid they will report anything that is told to them.
gregrutz 9 months ago
Man, America is not a democracy. Its a very new word we will soon need to learn:
Corporatocracy.
Learn it, its here now, America is not for the people, its for profit.
m1up 10 months ago 3
@m1up America was never a Democracy. ''I pledge allegiance to the flag and to the Republic ...''
We are a Republic. And yes the Dollar has always been in charge.
gregrutz 9 months ago
@gregrutz,
America is both a democracy and a republic. We are a republic because we do not have a hereditary monarch. We are also a representative democracy because the people have a voice in how the government is run through elected representatives. The UK is a democracy, but it is not a republic. The former Soviet Union was a republic, but not a democracy.
dmnemaine 8 months ago
@dmnemaine I thought we were a Republic because the people have a voice in how the government is run only through elected representatives.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@dmnemaine the former Soviet Union was not a Republic. A Republic is classified by representation of the citizenry. Just because the word Republic was in its name doesn't mean it is. The Soviet Union was a Communist state through and through. And the UK is a monarchy but it is closer to a Republic than a Democracy because it had representation but not direct election of its leaders. You obviously have no idea how governments are classified.
TheManMostMysterious 5 months ago
If Fox News is "fair and balenced" then Creationists will admit their mistakes honestly, without trying to pin the blame on someone else or backing up further and distorting their own message.
crazyinsane500 11 months ago
Fox News. "Fair and balanced."
Kinda like Conservapedia is the "Trustworthy Encyclopedia".
TuucciZ 1 year ago 3
AW they cut George Carlin off:(
AlmostAlwaysFabulous 1 year ago
Now*
THC1989 1 year ago
I want to be present to watch Bill O'Reilly die.
vaguelyreptilian 1 year ago
It's quite shocking how powerful the Murdoch Empire really is. Over here in the UK, his outlet, The Sun, pretty much controls elections, to the point they can publish a headline on election day and change the result completely from those predicted (see 1992 UK elections).
Darkdude929 1 year ago
It begins with being asked to deactivate your intellect, so you can believe in a deity and holy texts. Deactivating your intellect to such a degree, that you are asked to have "faith" in place of rationale. My problem with the whole thing is, where do you STOP circumventing your intellect and rationale? People have become so used to believing what they have been told in the name of god, that they are willing to accept ANYTHING, even if it's a lie, because the truth is alien and inconvenient.
bimmerella 1 year ago
I live outside the US and I don't think I have ever heard anyone talk in favour Fox News in fact I don't think I have ever heard as much as a single positive thing about Fox News. How many Americans actually watch Fox News as their daily source of news?
THC1989 1 year ago 2
@THC1989 considering 80% of this country's population is creatarded, i would assume they have a large viewer base.
rod31808 1 year ago
@THC1989 You hear it now: I'm a CANADIAN citizen that watches ONLY FOX NEWS, day in and day out, the only TV news outlet I trust for fair, balance and unafraid news. And FOX NEWS is also the most watched CABLE TV outlet in America and Canada, so my dear ATHEIST "partner" try to get your facts right before engaging in such biased comments.
401RoadWarrior 1 year ago
@401RoadWarrior Stating that I had never heard anyone talk in positive terms about Fox News is not biased but simply a statement, you have corrected me so that I no know of one. Please read what people write before you make an answer so that you are able to make an informed answer based on what is actually said rather then what you would like it to say. Thank you.
THC1989 1 year ago
@THC1989 I have no idea what you're trying to say, but regardless FNC is the MOST WATCHED cable tv channel in USA & CDA, that's a fact and in no way my "right-wing" imagination.
401RoadWarrior 1 year ago
@401RoadWarrior I'm simply saying that you didn't actually read the originally message that I wrote and so what you responded seemed rather misplaced. Why my standpoint as an atheist should in any way be relevant for this discussion eludes me. Unless you seem to think that you need to be religious to appreciate Fox News it in witch case they can hardly be called balanced.
THC1989 1 year ago
@THC1989
You've said:
I don't know of anyone who like FNC, (in your country)
401RoadWarrior did not refer to this statement in any way, period.
And you asked:
How much people watch FNC in North America?
Answer: FNC is the most watched cable TV in the US and Canada.
Asking this question you seemed to assume that FNC is not widely watched by Americans and Canadians, which leads to a conclusion that you do not have any idea of North American values.
Next time be careful in stating sth.
Xjarq 1 year ago
@Xjarq Your assumptions are really not relevant what is relevant is really is what I wrote. My statement wasn't "shit" as you put it but based on what I've actually observed from my place in the world, whenever fox is mentioned it's seems to be with bit of irony.
If you are going to quote me at least have the respect to quote me correctly.
THC1989 1 year ago
@Xjarq (continued) Stating that it is the most viewed cable TV doesn't really tell how many people actually watch it without accounting for how widespread cable TV is among these populations. Your "conclusion" doesn't seem to be based on arguments unless you think this is a valid argumentation:
You didn't know Fox News is widely watched cable TV = you don't understand US values.
THC1989 1 year ago
@THC1989
I paraphrased your comment just to make it short, what's wrong with that?
If my opinion ("FNC is the most watched TV in NA") doesn't convince you, I suggest looking for the numbers on google.
ps. I don't wanna be cheeky but PLEASE try to change your writing style to make it less complicated for me to read. Just try being less "scientific". I know your not English (me too) but it can really discourage people to start a discussion with you.
Xjarq 1 year ago
Why is it that in every break room in every Gov't bldg., corporate center, doctor's office, Jiffy Lube shop, or what have you I go into, the TV is tuned to FOX News and I can't find the damned remote?!
50zcarsman 1 year ago
@50zcarsman - agreed. It is scary - they have no idea. Sheeple.
GentlemenPreferHanes 1 year ago
I liked the one about herpes from beer pong, the last time I watched Fox News
tienen23 1 year ago
They should have the word "News" taken off and replaced with something more...honest and direct like..."Things we pulled out of our asses".
What do you guys think? :D
OowlL 1 year ago 4
if you don't like Fox, then don't watch it, I'm sure you can get your fix of liberal left wing bullshit at NPR and MSNBC. You guys just can't deal with anyone who disagrees with you.
marcemelliza 1 year ago
@marcemelliza
I don't watch FOX "news" BECAUSE it is crap.
kayjames888 1 year ago
@marcemelliza
neither can you clearly
OpiatedBliss 1 year ago
@marcemelliza - we don't mean to bark at you like utoob kids or football fans of opposing teams - just want to clear something up. U typed, "then don't watch it". Yet still the facts are up there that fox lies and distorts & sways in favour of their corp. friend$. Now that is very wrong. It is horrible not just for our country but for every country. Now, if you saw someone being hurt, swindled, etc.. - do you walk away and not watch? Or do you do something about it?
GentlemenPreferHanes 1 year ago
@marcemelliza We can't deal with anyone who lies and presents it as truth. A group who does all it can to instill fear and prejudice in the people of this country, and does it's very best to keep the populace ignorant of the true reality of the world. They need to be called out on what they do at every turn until they stop presenting themselves as NEWS.
Tazz2006 1 year ago
@DonExodus2 I think the conclusions you draw from the data are too strong. To actually verify that you get "dumber" from watching Fox news you need to see what happens when someone switches from another news source to fox news. Not just study someone who has always watched fox. As it is now whe can't separate cause and correlation.
thehoogard 1 year ago
Cool music! I gotta find it on the internet
deskset24 1 year ago
Fox News: The longer you stare, the funnier it gets.
GinnyStoleMyMan 1 year ago
Wow i would never think the guys at fox news would be right about anything.
exodus3115 1 year ago
The problem here is, Alot of people dont like Fox, but they dont give a shit, because people will tune in either way. As longs as they sell ad space and make money off of the news; which is a business btw. You can spend all day knocking them for being wrong which i do agree they are one sided.
They want to go against the grain, thats why they have pundits like hannity, oreilly, colmes etc etc. With all of the arguments between guests and them.
It creates entertainment. Not news
hanksranger 1 year ago
"Does Fox News, according to many trusted sources, perform virgins slaughters and child molestation before their daily prayer to Satan? I'm not saying they do this. I'm just asking questions!"
laflugantabastardo 1 year ago 4
google Doe's Account.
Wintblash 1 year ago
This guys is using NPR as the counter example LOL, NPR = Liberal version of Fox
ocanator 1 year ago
Yet Fox has also shown numerous points about the secrecies of our government that no other channel has even muttered. Fox was the one and only channel exposing the backgrounds of Obama's cabinet, like the gay child-molesterer in charge of education.
partymartyrocks 1 year ago
@partymartyrocks Anything to hurt a black man in power.
epshot 1 year ago
Nice video. Did you notice, though, that even when it is PROVEN how they purposely misinform their audience, their fans STILL stick up for them because they "dare to air conservative viewpoints" & they have good ratings. So strange.
patrioticlib 1 year ago
aah but thats were you might be wrong, news like everything on TV is there to entertain, not inform or educate merely entertain.
KaylinJH 1 year ago
I can barley listen to an O'reily montage without thinking up plans to kill him.
Good video, Fox news is a propaganda station and people need to know about it.
hellfirdragon17 1 year ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
liberalism is a mental disorder...
dithbmine1 1 year ago
fox news is a joke.. it is the product of idiots
DaysOfStorms 1 year ago 19
@DaysOfStorms You are the winner of the stupidist comment of the year award. Do you have a brain?
SilverFox466 1 month ago
Funny that they dominate the ratings today.
beaners4hire 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The purpose of the news depends on who it is owned by. The purpose of the news then entirely lies in justifying the interests of the organisation that owns it.
If it is in my interest to use scare tactics for people to buy my product X, then I will go ahead and "prove" that eggs are not edible and cause serious injury to health.
MrKatamewaza 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrKatamewaza 1 year ago
@zelos88
A UCLA/Stanford media study showed that Fox News is the most centrist, while CNN and MSNBC lean left.
bonchbonch 2 years ago
Don't trust all studies, some get "brought" if you get my drift.
As it goes, Fox News has shown unreserved bias towards the republicans. Just watch some of Liberal Viewer's videos to see plain examples of Fox saying only bad things about Democrats and good about republicans. They don't even accept the possibility that Obama's economical strategy might have ended the recession.
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
I see, so you're going to dismiss a UCLA/Stanford study because you don't like its conclusions.
Obama's economic strategy didn't "end" the recession...maybe you didn't notice that it's still going on.
bonchbonch 2 years ago
No, I am going to dismiss the UCLA/Stanford study because it doesn't match the evidence... what is easily shown in Liberal Viewer's videos.
Also the recession isn't still going on, the after effect of the recession are still going on, the end of recession and full economical recovery are different things, however the USA economy has been in incline since Obama toke office and is now the fastest growing year in the American economy of any president's 1st year since WWII.
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
The study provides evidence. You're dismissing it because it contradicts your pre-made conclusion.
Yes, the recession is still going on. Obama's big stimulus package did nothing but protect government jobs. Your stat about it being the fastest growing year is hilarious. We have double-digit employment, and it's predicted to continue. The government itself is saying the economy will stay in the dumps.
You're a blind Obama fanboi.
bonchbonch 2 years ago
No, I am not an Obama fanboy, you are just an Obama hater.
I have read up on the report, and it's based not on the center, but in comparison to the average voters vote.... that is a massively different value when you consider that USA has a traditional right wing favoritism. This would mean actually positions further to the left then the average vote would be near to the center then those of the same proportion to the right.
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
You will make any crazy leap to justify your conclusions. Please, continue to cover your eyes and enjoy your record-high deficit since Obama thinks deficit spending is how you stimulate an economy. Democrats recently raised the debt limit yet again!
bonchbonch 2 years ago
My Conclusions are based on watching fox news and seeing just how extremely biased it is, I can't admit to having seem the other channels to much, I live in the UK and am more likely to watch BBC then anything else. However this doesn't distract from the fact there are many glaring problems with Fox News and it's often ignorance spreading bias.
Obama's policies are likely the cause of recovery in the economy (something you don't even seem to be aware of)
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
but Fox wouldn't even admit that, that could have been a possibility. They said at best it was nothing more then a reaction against his policies what made no sense but they still said it anyway.
The fact that you have failed to show knowledge about the recovery in the economy makes me wonder if you are one of those Fox Viewers that this report is actually on about.
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
No, your conclusions are based on your personal biases, and when presented with a neutral study, you invent reasons to dismiss it.
If Obama's policies caused recovery, why has the unemployment rate remained the same while our deficit has exploded in size? Deficit spending doesn't stimulate an economy. I don't know where you're getting your facts from.
bonchbonch 2 years ago
Any study based on "bias" can not be free from bias. The study you are on about was not about bias away from the neutral view point but bias in comparison to the average US voter. And we already know the average US voter votes generally to the right.
(Un)employment is not directly proportional to the economy, as I said we are still feeling the after effects, soon as companies start to get ready to expand again, they will start hiring more people again, they won't do that just off the bat tho.
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
You're so desperate to avoid acknowledging a neutral story or the failure of the Obama administration to address the economic recession. Obama's given us a record deficit...we'll have to pay it.
bonchbonch 2 years ago
Nope, not really desperate, I just look things up, and I find flaws in things that don't appear to fit the evidence, what you claim that fox new is the least bias news channel surely got that going, then I found out the study was based on the average voter and not the politically neutral view point. More so meta research has found out that overall there is a neutrality in media bias so naturally there must be something to the right evening that out... and there isn't much more right then fox.
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
And no, Obama didn't give you the record Deficit, that was Bush, he moved over 8 years from a 2 billion dollar security to a 3 trillion dollar deficit. If you think Obama is responsible for that, you are clearly misguided. Under Obama it has even been acknowledge by fox news that is certainly is the fastest growing economical first year of any US president since WWII, they just don't acknowledge that he is responsible for that growth, when he is almost certainly responsible for it.
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
So yeah, stop being a bush and republican fanboy, Mccain wanted to further the same economical policies that got you into the problem in the first place, Sarah Palin ain't got a brain cell in her head and Science disproved creationism a very long time ago.
DoomsdayR3sistance 2 years ago
And at last, you run out of straws and finally grasp for the typical "bush and republican fanboy" crap, even though I'm not a Republican. What does McCain or Palin have to do with this? This discussion is about Obama and the Democrats' failure.
When you actually come back with some counterarguments to refute a single thing I've said, let me know. Otherwise, I completely dismantled everything you've thrown at me...and it was easy.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
Yes, Obama did give us a record deficit. You need to take a look at how much the deficit increased UNDER OBAMA ALONE. The fastest growing economic first year? Completely bogus claim that's already been dissected elsewhere. You're just parroting talking points now.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
Again, you're purposely misinterpreting the results of the study because you don't like the conclusion it reached.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
'record deficit... deficit spending... record high deficit...' you're the kind of idiot fox news thrives on.
dekotable 2 years ago
I acknowledge your complete lack of a counterargument.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
I acknowledge your complete lack of a counterargument. And your refusal to accept known facts.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
Bonchbonch, you are definitely the kind of person that fox news thrives on, you believe in disinformation and do not understand any of the topic that is being talked about. I would say perhaps you do not understand simple facts. Fox News could NOT deny that the economy had increased... they ADMITTED it, they just couldn't admit it was because of Obama... so if fox news can't dissect it and they hate Obama, why do you think other sources successfully could?
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
I don't even watch Fox News. You are completely unable to refute any facts, so you just fall back on trying to stereotype me. You've really run out of steam here.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
Not really, I suspect what I have said is closer to the truth then you would admit. And some of what I have said is based on fact, nothing I have seen that you have said has any factual or truthful evidence behind it what so ever.
I even found a massively glaring hole in the one piece you did rely on the Stanford Study that it tried to take the position of not the center position but simply the position of the average American voter on how it based figure.
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago
Given that there have been many other studies that have taken the center position and mega reports, they generally find media bais is equaled out across the board.
None of these reports were based on how truthful or reliable sources of the news channels actually were, what a lot of people are saying is Fox News generally makes a lot of stuff up and declares it's opinions as facts and as such their viewers are full of much more misconceptions.
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago
So no, with these points standing still, I don't have to make any more steam, the steam I already have for these will get me to my intended destination. But if you must attempt to use this latest point, where did I actually say you watched fox news? I said you were the type fox news thrives on, a contrastingly different statement, this doesn't imply you actually watch fox news.
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
You can suspect all you want. I'm the one providing neutral studies, and you're the one who dismisses them because you don't like their conclusions. Your refutal of the study is ludicrous and non-scientific.
You need to believe Fox News is some evil entity because you're biased. You need an us vs. them battle. It doesn't bother you that the entire rest of the media leans left, based on multiple studies. To you, the ends justify the means.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
As I said, it's not the conclusion I am not happy with to start with it's the very basis under what it was done under, it was a study compared to average Joe American, not to the neutral point. As I have said there have been other studies, heck even Wikipedia has links to many other studies that show massively different results.
And no, I don't need to believe Fox News is evil, Evil is just a concept that doesn't really have meaning. However I have cited a user who has displayed MANY...
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago
examples of Fox News purposefully displaying misinformation for their own political agenda! LiberalViewer has many such examples.... in the hundreds... possibly even thousands now.
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
We've already covered this. You're flat-out wrong about the study. Contrary to your claim, other media studies confirm the results. As I said, you're just biased. You will never acknowledge any point that might damage your side, because you're involved in a schoolyard us vs. them fight between liberals and conservatives.
Look at how your arguments have fallen apart here. It's hilarious.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
As I say again NO IT'S YOU THAT IS WRONG? Are you outright retarded on this issue? oh no a personal attack? that shows I can't argue? Oh no right, you still can not show any such examples that it is not the case that the Stanford Report didn't do as I have said, because let's admit it, you just saw the results, saw what you wanted and are posting this here! You are the hilarious one, in that you are hilariously wrong.
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago
If you don't get my previous response, I am essentially saying, literally all you have done is go "media study", "media study", "media study". The one criticism I found of it you can't even dispel and I have given other examples showing that Fox news isn't just biased, it's spreading misinformation, in fact Fox News admits it is biased and claims that it is better then the rest because it admits it, saying BBC News sucks for being left biased (what isn't true) and all that crud.
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago
@DoomsdayR3sistance
And this is where you fall apart. Your emotional rage is running so high that you can't even punctuate or capitalize properly. You're actually trying to argue that a UCLA/Stanford media study is flawed because you don't like its conclusion.
I don't know if you make it a habit of criticizing academic experts who do studies, but I suggest not flying into a blind rage whenever you encounter a study that contradicts your pre-drawn conclusions. You'll thank me someday.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
And just because you like it's conclusion means it isn't flawed? I have pointed out the flaw, you have yet again failed to say why this isn't a flaw or why this is wrong, you skip around the issue as this is why you fall apart.
However punctuation or capitalize, I have Developmental Dyspraxia you tard, you just did the very say thing you said I did, you stereotyped my behavior when in fact it's due to something completely different. It is you who falls apart here.
DoomsdayR3sistance 1 year ago 3
why are you even wasting your time? bonchbonch is an idiot, case closed... go read a book or something, much more productive things to do than try to persuade an idiot that he's an idiot.
dekotable 1 year ago
Another idiot with nothing but insults instead of actual counterarguments. You prove my point.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
You don't understand. I don't need a counterargument. If you honestly think that Fox News isn't biased, then you're an idiot.
dekotable 1 year ago 31
Studies show that they're not. You simply don't like them because they dare to air conservative viewpoints on the same level as liberal ones, unlike the rest of the media.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
@bonchbonch
which studies? Cite your sources, because I can make shit up just as well as you
amandarandom89 1 year ago
@amandarandom89
I didn't "make shit up." You obviously haven't even read the conversation and are dismissing anything I say right from the start because you're biased and can't see outside your own worldview.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
@bonchbonch
What an odd reaction...
Why the hostility when I ask for the title of this study? Why not simply provide the source and make me shut up? Your reaction makes me you only have the one methodologically flawed study by the UCLA, and these "other studies" you refer to are as of yet unnamed.
amandarandom89 1 year ago
What hostility? I simply responded to you after you claimed I "made shit up." The UCLA-Stanford study is freely available, and I suggest you Google for it and the rest. It's common knowledge that the mainstream media leans left.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
How...exactly....does one make a study on bias? (Also, if you believe that...seriously...wow.) Don't get me wrong, all news channels I've seen are biased.
khatool 1 year ago
@khatool
Uh, it's not just one study. And why wouldn't you believe that study? The answer is that you don't like it's conclusion, so you're dismissing it from the start. Meanwhile, it's common knowledge that the mainstream media leans left.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
Its a common misconception. News casters surveyed tend to lean left on social issues and are to the right on fiscal issues. But the vast majority of editors are left leaning.
phirismi 1 year ago
@khatool It might be true that all American news networks have some form of bias, I don't know, I don't watch every 24 hour news network all day long, however, in any statistical set, most data points differ from the norm one way from the other.
dunnyhf 1 year ago
@dunnyhf Sure every network may have some bias. But, no network is as biased as often and onesided as Fox News. All of the "mistakes" that Fox news makes helps the Republicans/Conservatives /or hurt Liberals/Democrats.
Eaglesfaninca 1 year ago
@khatool A bias occurs when something infuences the results, forcing the data to propagate a much larger number of outliers (normally, about 95% of data would be within two standard deviations, outliers are results that is unexpected in relation to the rest of the data). The bias of other news networks are relatively low, and can be ignored as it is expected.
dunnyhf 1 year ago
@khatool According to that survey, Fox had a high level of deliberate misinformation, making those who watch it see the world through their eyes, so they would support the war, or whatever Fox wanted.
I won't be shocked if Fox said that people can fly by flapping their arms hard enough, the number of deaths by falling would skyrocket.
dunnyhf 1 year ago
@dekotable And MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Huffington Post, and New York Post is not biased? You have one news organization (FOX) out of thousands that represent the right and you want them shut down and silenced. The only time you support the 1st ammendment is when it can be used to spread the leftist agenda. Nice!
SilverFox466 1 month ago
I neither like or dislike its conclusion--I don't form my worldview based on emotions, like you. Again, your claim of a flaw is invalid. Finding out you're mentally retarded just solidifies my other points about your lack of reasoning.
bonchbonch 1 year ago
These studies sound very interesting. Please give me more information about them and tell me what they are called. i would like to study the studies for myself.
guruatomik 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hate videos like this. You don't have to pursuade people to think what you think. That what makes the world great. What makes you different from Fox news for making poeple think what you want them to think. The only difference between you and Fox news is that they are more popular and people might blame them because they have trusted them. I hate Fox news to because they are soooooo 1 sided but thats how news in the 21st century work. I'm sorry.
Get a Life
BHSE23 2 years ago
What liberals have missed is properly "framing" Fox News as an issue. Everyone should read George Lakoff's book called "Don't Think of an Elephant."
All liberals now repeat after me.
"Fox News and republican party."
Say it a thousand times. Say it til you're blue in the face. Every time you mention Fox call them, "Fox News and republican party." Every time you mention the republican party call them "Fox News and republican party."
DO NOT DEVIATE! Tell all your friends. Please repost.
robhoneycutt 2 years ago 2
2:24 better be photoshopped, or I will be REALLY pissed.
TMF58 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now I understand why there are so many numbskulls who come here to share their ignorance and bigotry!
I knew Faux News was garbage and that 120% of their statistics were unreliable. See:
tinyurl com/yct9fnh
5 stars. Excellent!
pseudotruth 2 years ago
We need to get rid of Fox,turn them of make em poor .
kickatoe 2 years ago
On the BBC World Service (12 Jan 2010), Rupert Murdoch's SON said both he and his father are ashamed of FOX, and moves are being made to cleaen up their act.
mghills 2 years ago
this video is great, I love to watch Bill argue and give everyone a "fair chance" to respond while he's screaming over the top of their say. foxnews is hilarious to me, but remember you HAVE to be a good old christian conservative to have any dignity in this world! ...not
Smarshall865 2 years ago 7
That's why I hate fox "news". It''s not news...
vava54own 2 years ago 3
Excellent video.
Fox News - We Deceive. You Believe.™
RuinousRight 2 years ago 14
...if you're a right wing or evangelical idiot =-)
...or 6 years old XD
TAz69x 2 years ago 2
I think a six-year-old can tell the difference between news and Faux 'News'. An evangelist, on the other hand...
AnimalNitrates 2 years ago 3
@RuinousRight
Blimey that's good.
Ebrainiac1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God bless the folks at Fox. Its the only news channel that Obama dosen't run.
1kcharrison 2 years ago
Yes let your imaginary sky daddy bless these bigoted bastards.
CAN I GET AN AMEN!!
MrBrent123t 2 years ago 6
Perhaps it could also be true that the less you know the more likely you are likely to trust Fox "news".
Ignorance feeds ignorance either way.
wheezdumb 2 years ago 8
Has anyone noticed (and it's interesting to say the least) how much Bill O'Reilly has toned down since the elections and Glenn Beck's transition?
Anyone know what's that about?
vfreeck 2 years ago
I think he just seems less extreme , because the rest of them are taking positions slightly to the right of Genghis Khan.
YALLLAAAR 2 years ago 5
the only people who should be told to SHUT UP are religious zealots who shove their noses into other peoples' affairs like homosexuals and abortion.
TLSlayer 2 years ago 2
Don't people have enough selfrespect not to watch this crap and consider it news? Some people brag about being the most misinformed mistaken morons in the USA. When Fox started organizing Tea Bag protests, producing and directing them as news didn't it make you want to vomit? How can these morons watch this shit and pretend it's news? It's like taking lessons on how to be an idiot.
oeyesea 2 years ago 3
FOX News - Television for Morons.
Lanedude08 2 years ago 4
Notice how many of the Fox News headlines have a ? mark at the end of the title?
Your allowed to say anything you want as long as it's got a ? mark at the end, because then your only asking a question. Fox knows this.
George Bush Needs to Kill a Starving Child To Reach Orgasm?
I've not said anything bad about him, i've just implied that it's probably true.
seanbrockest 2 years ago 34
thats the funniest thing I`ve heared for quiet some time.
FranzKarlWeber 2 years ago
Makes me glad fox news isn't aired here...
pienipaha 2 years ago
Kim Jong Il must be taking lessons from Fox News
etatauri 2 years ago 2
What he said to that atheist offends me so much...it's pathetic.
Ilikelimpbizkit 2 years ago 4
The problem with getting your news from reality is that reality, apparently, has a liberal bias.
justis26 2 years ago 10
Even abroad (I'm from the Netherlands, but I know for a fact that it is the same in Germany) Fox News is notorious for its non-informative propaganda. It is widely considered a cancerous growth in journalism and we over here compare it to WW2 nazi propaganda or chinese and north-korean propaganda. It is very disconcerting to know that many Americans are influenced by filth like this.
AndreaZ64 2 years ago 21
It sucks that this virus has spread there as well. I'm in the think of it here in the bible-belt and I don't see any end in sight. The more informed I become the more people I meet that are not.
nick317ryan 2 years ago 14
I'll second that! I'm from France and I know that Fox news is very manipulative and biased. This was particularly flagrant after 9/11 and during the presidential campaign where they were almost openly begging viewers to vote for McCain. Now it seems they're taking great pleasure in their new sport "Obama-bashing"! And on a personal note, I'll add that Bill O'Reilly is a twat.
Prearius 2 years ago 10
i love france, germany and the netherlands ( i'm in the uk) and having visited paris and amsterdam i feel my country has much to learn from france and the netherlands in terms of public services
i felt annoyed when hannity said obama wanted "a united states of france" what? a nation with the best healthcare in the world? a nation who stands against a stupid and pointless war? a country were more kids are enrolled into school than in the us?
kayman92 2 years ago
To have my dad quote O'Reilly verbatim is sickening, and to get into an arguement with a conservative to have him start yelling "THIS IS THE NO SPIN ZONE" at me is....just depressing.
metalshoes 2 years ago 5
haha excuse me or laughing at your situation =)
ihdiferog 2 years ago
Yeah it is pretty funny : p
metalshoes 2 years ago
Wow.. I feel so sorry for you. I'm so glad nobody I know watches FOX, especially O'Reilly. But all the other ones are equally disturbed people.
etatauri 2 years ago
fox is very oedipal if you think about it....
rj12124 2 years ago 2
The only intelligent thing on Fox is the Simpsons.
XenMonkey13 2 years ago 23
YEAHHHHH
tetleydidley 2 years ago 2
Wow, to think that I used to watch Fox News... I'm glad I had the sense to recognize it for the shit that it is and to move on.
Frosttty 2 years ago 7
Fox "News" is a great source of comedy....
TrigunBebop 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
donexodus, when the revolution comes, you better run!
mtfrankie 2 years ago
Could you please watch the Aphrael damned video before you comment?!!
and yes look up "Aphrael" on google
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
What is the music you used here? It is wonderful. Made me a little less sick while watching Fox.
cantbelievehowstupid 2 years ago
marcy playground
KTrayn707 2 years ago
Thanks.
wheezdumb 2 years ago
song is by Marcy Playground - Comin' Up From Behind
jasonramdeo1 2 years ago
OMG THANK YOU.
Bardlettt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Now that all the mainstream media, CNN, and especially msnbc are all nothing more than state run media outlets, Fox is the only source of objective news. Of course that wAS TRUE BEFORE OBAMA HOODWINKED THE REST OF THE PRESS..
marklross2 2 years ago
Fox is the only source of objective news? Hahahaha, keep telling yourself that.
PainAddict666 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're an idiot. When Bush was in - Fox was "a mouthpiece for the administration" according to dim wits like you. Now that Obama in in, who has taken that role?
Use what brain you have left PUTZ
marklross2 2 years ago
Oh, okay. Left and right, up and down...right and wrong. You are so right, now I have seen the light. Your attempt to relegate me to play your stupid game of partisan politics will fail. Goodbye tard, forgive the air you breathe.
PainAddict666 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh go cut yourself or something to feed your sickness - you are lost.......
marklross2 2 years ago
I finished you without even a fight.
'go cut yourself', very mature of you.
PainAddict666 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"PainAddict" real mature handle...you are an idiot.......
marklross2 2 years ago
I think we're both acting immature. I do not think you're an idiot and I'm done with the name calling. Good day sir.... :)
PainAddict666 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're right - name calling is stupid, but applying a descriptor such as "idiot" to someone who has earned the title is not "name calling." I will say again, if you rely solely upon msnbc, cnn, and the other Obama media outlets for your information, you will only be getting ONE SIDE of any issue - good riddance sir..........
marklross2 2 years ago
Oh, so if I call you a douchebag (seeing that you've earned the title) I'm not 'name calling' either. Thanks for the info.
I'm half your age and more mature than you. I tried to be nice yet you use word play to insult me again? Petty.
PainAddict666 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't care if you are "nice to me." I care that you be critically informed......
marklross2 2 years ago
And im sure none of the other news channels do anyt