9/11 Audio Fakery: "tinacart" Revisited

[Flugabwehrkanone]

I think she said "they did it on purpose" because it was unclear whether or not the first "plane" hit the tower deliberately or on accident. When the second one hit, it would have been obvious that it was on purpose.

Nevertheless, excellent find. In the immortal words of one man, "Holy *FUCK*!"

[tie32101]

There not the same. The first is more like a yelling scream and the other is a screetching scream. No similarity.

[peterp21]

Wow. Just came back to watch this video again, and I totally glossed over the NatGeo video at the end. Didn't realize the same woman now says "They did it on purpose".

[peterp21]

I thought the black guy was kinda funny in the second video. "AW SHEET!"

[peterp21]

Saw this for the first time on September Clues and say what you want about whether there was a conspiracy or not, planes or not, whatever. But it's pretty clear, and disturbing, that at a minimum there's been some sort of audio/vieo fakery/tampering. It's clearly the same "Oh my god" woman in each clip, reacting live to different videos and different parts of the attack. Disturbing.

[svendiamond]

wow she says "they did it on purpose" are there any other videos that mention this??!??

[svendiamond]

OH MY GOD

[NOmeansnoFAN]

these audio clips could be better scrutinized, there are a myriad of audio programs that will di such a task.

[brogmyster]

The language of the bitch

[N1k1mon]

@Freqband

You're only partially correct about the sounds, but you're dead wrong about your conclusions because you looked at the wrong evidence to make your conclusions.

It's the same lady alright, but look at the screams in this pattern instead: Vid# 1 = OMG(a), OMG(b), Vid#2 = OMG(b), OMG(b). In vid#2 the 2 OMGs are like (or are) OMG(b) from the first.

Vid#2 is (or almost is) the same OMG twice in a row. We trick ourselves expecting 2-1 to have the same inflections as 1-1

[MrSapphireLabyrinth]

Sound travelling pretty fast at 3.40 when the plane hits the building.

[zpzozo]

Stopping the Video at 3:41 You clearly see on this video the Plane Vanishes. There seems to be no Immediate Impact destruction, Only from the side. Vision is obscured by the Bank of Manhattan trust., also camera movement makes analysis difficult. The Voice is the same. Believe what you will

[chibangin007]

tinacarts video is a complete fake! its true. anyone who thinks this was a real footage is a complete retard.

[MapleLeafConfederacy]

watch 3:51 the plane magically disapears and theres no hole, and then boom theres an explosion, but the explosion to the left of the building is totally off, and the wtf a little bit later on something looking like a missle flies out of the explosion. watch the video over and over. pause and stare. thats the only way i got it. but this is the ultimate evidence. its fakke!!!

[webber1966]

TpendragonT if you dont care than why dont you get the fuck outta the country asshole

[trashman02]

1. The voices in the first two videos are different in tonality, even slowed down a minuscule amount, the tone wouldn't change the dramatically.

2. The angles are diferent in the videos with no sound.

3. The building collapse scenes are also at a different angle, it's only slight, but it is still different.

4. Once again, just my opinion. I'm not saying you are right or wrong; this is just what I see.

5. Nobody will ever know for sure what really happened on that day. Only theory.

[bweazel]

@ 3:42. Hahaha. You can see the other 757 at the right side of the screen for about a half a second. How come the media never talked about that one? Could it be because it's Flight 175 flying away from the towers?

[accersitusmaximus]

Good video!

We need to expose this fearmongering and "war on terror" fraud.

[Magnus2552112]

Wow, great job well done.

[TpendragonT]

i'm confused on what he is trying to say here, the only connection is see (or hear) is the same "omg" female scream in 3 videos, wich, by the way, were different pitches/tones.

only the same words, and a lot of people probably said "oh my god"

[ImyManz99]

No, the "OMGs" are exactly the same voiced by the same female. Go record each video, remove some of the background humming and hissing if you know how to and you will see that the waveforms are the same. The fakerist shifted the semitone higher in one of them to make it sound different, but the difference is only subtle.

[TpendragonT]

i dont really care that much about it.. neither should you..

[bigc028282]

find her bosses and put them on trial. this is video created with for knowledge of the event. it was manipulated and released with a specific intention. we are all stupid you know. The views are not what you and i would take. they restrict the view of the flumes before the collapse and as it is collapsing. Watch the most recent videos released from the doj and fbi and you see the same stuff. Good thing not every ones asleep. ITS NEVER TOO LATE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

[RuffleTheTeacher]

2:40

Watch the white dot, visable on the face of tower near the SE corner. Also watch 1/4 of the way north on the same face as collapse starts.

Have you heard of Dr. Judy Wood?

This looks like the focused high-energy weapons she refers to.

[OzzybenOswald]

The video itself is fake. Those are intentionally placed false "clues".

[bweazel]

Very nice. Never seen the one of her saying "they did it on purpose". Clearly this is propoganda. We should find that lady and put her on trial. Since you know, google and youtube have logs of everything posted to their address, ISPs are required to keep logs. If we REALLY wanted to know who tinacart is we could find her easily. Good research! Great post! Keep it up.

[Sature1985]

btw. at 1:08 this guy walks in front of the camera, normally if u put on a camera on a window u dont leave much space and u can clearly see the bluescreen, when he crosses the camera. its a set up, the tina cart footage is used in other tv programs too...

[colmmernagh]

Man, looking at some of these comments you would be left with the impression that everyone's an actor, both for and against.

Someone said the voices are different and now i smell bullshit.

[colmmernagh]

Uploaded in 2006.

How do you know "tinacart" didnt fake this audio ? Is there a reliable source for this clip and its audio being shown on any TV stations ?

[colmmernagh]

In 2001 or 2002, not bloody 2006, bit late there.

[bweazel]

Well since National Geographic (in 2005)seemed to have the video of "her" before "she" posted it on youtube, obviously there is some media involvement here. It's about time we gather ALL of these people, from History channel, NBC, ABC, CBS, National geographic, CNN, Fox. ALL OF THEM to get their asses in a court room and prepared to be drilled. We'll see how all those CEOs stories match up then. The audio is obviously faked.

[FreqBand]

Instead of insulting you any more,....

Try this....

Play the very first OMG a few times over and over, and try screaming it yourself, copying/imitating it exactly....you're alone, don't be embarrassed.

Got it sounding pretty similar ?...Now play the "any" OMG in the next clip.

Does it sound even remotely the same ?

[apocalypsynch]

@Freqband

It's the same woman.

Why are the screams at 1:37 in this video looped?

watch?v=XW18k8EoJb4

[Elpiper]

Not to mention that both versions of the SAME video have different soundtracks.

[FreqBand]

It's not the same woman.

The most common expression that morning was, "Oh my god"......it's inevitable that some recorded voices sounded similar.

That other video is of a news montage after the events. It is not uncommon for the editor of such a montage, to "sweeten" the audio to fill-in audio gaps, or badly recorded audio.

It's not unique to 911.....and not an attempt to change what happened. It is of no significance.

[bweazel]

It is the same woman. You can't deny that is her in the tinacart vid AND the national geographic vid. Two of the exact same vids, with completely different audio. She says they did it on purpose for christ sake. Do you hear that anywhere in the tinacart vid on youtube? No. You don't. So there it is right there. Busted. She read those lines a couple different times and they were lapped on at appropriate times. Wake up out of your denial please. It's not that hard of a life to live in reality

[FreqBand]

Those voices are different.

The first clip the "oh my GOD"...the "god" word goes up in pitch like a screech owl, the next clip. it does not.

The inflections are totally different.

Stupid gullible people.

[peergynt91]

If it was intentional fakery by the government why would they use the same voice actress? That makes zero sense. They have an almost unlimited budget, and they would know that every video would be looked at over and over by the curious public, why not hire anyone else? Please explain.

[Elpiper]

It might have been done by a small group of independent voice actors and uploaded under the YouTube username "tinacart" to mislead researchers or garner hits for their videos.

That being said, the fact that the very same voice actors are also heard in the National Geographic special would imply that these voice actors were working for the media.

I agree it makes no sense to use the same voice actors but they did it for other 9/11 "amateur" videos, like Hezarkhani's. Too certain of themselves?

[bweazel]

Exactly. The CNN vid is fake too. Or at the very least has fake audio.

[TheWebfairy]

watch?v=ZvUrJd4LpUA&NR=1

tina cart footage with Dan Rather

Also a longer version of the triangle cloud seen in the Naudet Snuff Film

[Spottedleaf0star]

Dear fafnir

how do those sound DIFFERENT?????? does anyone agree with me?? they sound exactly the same...i dont understand i mean its just so ovious....what the hellk are you smoking????  sincerely Spottedleaf0star

[fafnir242]

Wow, they're totally not the same. Not at all. I don't know what the hell you're smoking.

[greatbenwa]

awesome! I am going to add this to my AUDIO FAKERY series. (of coarse credited to you)

[simonshack]

An excellent complement to my audio analysis on SEPTEMBER CLUES part C. The 'Oh my God" actress was used to add drama to many 9/11 videos. All in all, the audio comparisons are probably the strongest evidence that ALL audio(+video) material we have from 9/11 was doctored by a centralized op centre. Anyone denying this should simply spend some time studying the evidence at hand. Among the hordes of honest 911 truthseekers, any controversy should fade away as this becomes clear to all.

[hahawhat98]

hey simon, you don't know me but I know of your work, there is a new video that shows that the smoke was copied and mirrored in one of the 9/11 videos that features the empire state building in the foreground...if you do a search of "911", you should be able to find it...I can't remember if you found that one or not so it appears to be new...

[Spottedleaf0star]

im sorry but i have to do this

* high pitch voice*

OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY OH MY GOD OH MY GOD

but all in all good job! =)

[timtima724]

i dont get how the videos can be fake tho cuz this only happened oce and would be impossible to re-enact

[censormeftw]

but very easily edited... duh.

[Mahdiarmy]

thank you and one thing you will love this.

you can hear MICHAEL HEZARKHANI, the iranian jewish bastard with his fake video. plz see my video on michael hezarkhani

[Mahdiarmy]

you hear him at 1.39-1:42

see this

com/watch?v=-0XrU70Lc-U

i have shared a few of your great videos to my 300 friends who will also send it to their friends. I thank you from my heart and may God bless you and your house for the truth you are spreading.

[IeatRAWmeatAllWeek]

Great video, 5 and faved

[CNN911Fakes]

At v1:54

"The other one's falling, too"

Quite prescient!

Michael Hezarkhani's voice is so, so, so...

unique.

"I want you to see if this sounds familiar: any time you try a decent crime, you got fifty ways you're gonna fuck up. If you think of twenty-five of them, then you're a genius... and you ain't no genius"

Unrecorded aside to gwb on 9/10/01

-or-

Body Heat (1981)

[5OOPush]

Oh my god! Great catch...

[Brugality]

check and mate

[youzurk]

***** Fav

great work