god just reading these comments depresses me. What has this world come too. I think all people who don't believe in evolution, shouldn't be allowed to use any of the scientific achivements, acomplished because of the understanding of evolution. Like most modern medicine for example.
Go do your own research instead of listening to the stupid propaganda your church or whatever gives you.
How explaining the variety of eyes, benefits of eyes and increase in survival, prove evolution at all?? In part 1, the narrator said "Scientists don't know why they evolve light sensitive eyes". In Part 4 it says "eyes are connected to the brain". And that's it. They should discuss about optic nerves and visual cortex more, or the interpretation of signal and impulse that create image. They have 45 minutes and it's more than enough but they opted to discuss it in 3 seconds.
Why do you care? I am perfectly willing to accept that I am "star-stuff" given order and meaning by random chance, but, out of that same order, we then feel compelled to give order and meaning to that random chance because we have to feel that our tiny lives have significance outside ourselves? It IS frightening to be a mote on a speck lost in eternity, but it is the case, and, sorry for the inconvenience, that's all there is.
Hahaha, this is a joke!, the eye did not evolve!, it was designed!, Natural seclection has no increase of DNA!, that debunks darwins theory right there!, Also genes cannot meutate indefinetly!
@85Aheadstix ahh so there must be a magical infinite god who just popped out of nowhere and exists in a non-physical spiritual world which is totally undetectable on any basis and defies everything we know about the universe to a ridiculous extent but we KNOW its there because an ancient book told us.
@BayAreaAtheist there are videos about this kind of thing. The problem is that evolutionists like propaganda. This theory has to be pushed on people at all levels simply because the evidence for it is wholly lacking. It's a collection of interesting stories and suppositions on how things would have worked with their theory. It's sad, but its easy to understand why people don't see the errors in their reasoning when they need to believe in a completely natural world.
If you don't see that all you are doing is making up a story. Maybe you should take on the evolution of the hummingbird next. Or the bombardier beetle, or the woodpecker. Find some made up story about that
just ignore the people who deny evolution. These people deny evolution because of religious beliefs. I used to deny evolution too, but that was when i was a christian. I studied evolution on my own and found out that it made sense. These evolution vs creation arguments go on and on, with each side bashing each other, and no one ever wins. This is not an evolution vs creation video. So chill off and ignore them. ......and also, Eyevolution is very amazing lol.
@bluemime86 Hahaha, deny evolutiuon?, so what your gonna deny Dr Francis collins?, the head of the Human genome?, who i might add is a christian with ph.D in Bio chemisty and genetics, he accredits God for designing the DNA, he says no random chance made something that complex, its IMPOSSIBLE!
you might wanna check out Dr Michael denton ph.D in Bio chemisty and M.D, he says there is no substantial evidence for evolution, and hes an evolutionist!.
Too bad, the video must be remade. Australian teem found complex eyes in the early Cambrian. So much for slow changes through genetic mutations filtered by natural selection.
@mejc2 You have misunderstood the findings. These were arthropod eye impression suggesting incomplete sclerotisation. Their disarticulation allowed for phosphatisation with no evidence of biomineralisation indicating chitin.
There is no issue for eye evolution with this discovery.
You misunderstand the finding. This discovery changes the entire theory. It eliminates slow primitive adaptations through mutation and natural selection. It forces you to change to rapid changes. Not only do these eyes suggest more advanced vision than previously predicted, they also insinuate advanced locomotion, predatory instincts, digestion systems, advanced neural connections and brain activity. All produced in a geologic twinkling of an eye.
The finding is completely inconsistent with the Darwinian process. However, no worries. Evolutionists will make up a new story to fit the evidence. They are already claiming super fast evolution occurred in the Cambrian period. Their evidence is the advanced forms found in the lower levels. No slow gradual primitive adaptations, Sudden appearance. So Super fast evolution is the answer obviously. However this is not science, this is man making up stories to support their beliefs.
@mejc2 Your misunderstanding of the Emu Bay fossils is understandable when your sources are misrepesenting them to you. The fossils are completely consistent with what we expect.
@mejc2 the evolution can be fast that is why we call it Cambrian Explotion. When a group of living beings finds a new echosystem they evolve more quickly.
Evolution? Genetic entropy is empirical. Evolution is impossible. Devolution is observed. Mutations cannot and have never been observed to create new organs or body plans.
@mejc2 there is evidence it happened you are just closing your eyes to it. Fosil registers and genetic markers show how organs evolve and new body plans form previews ones
Fossil evidence refutes Darwinian Evolution. Also, human genetic mutation rates are far too high for the species to be as old as Darwinism claims and will go extinct within the next hundred generations.
@mejc2 wich fossils??? why you think that the rate of mutations are to high?? because last time i check the majority of mutations have no impact in fenotipe and cell function becuase 98% of the DNA is non coding DNA. The fossil evidence shows what we espect form evolution, the complex eyes (like insects) you mention are the most simple kind of eyes out there if you find a mamalian type of eye in cambrian i will belive you.
Part 5 What I am looking for is a reasoned answer to a reasoned question. Prove to me that Evolutionists can think for themselves and not just swallow some half-cocked story with no substance. I now know I did that for many years, but now, it seems to me that the thinking person’s only option is to reject Evolution, based on the arguments provided to support it
Part 4. controlling the lens and iris. All this must happen before the swiveling eye can function. And not only that, it has to happen twice, because I don’t know of any animal with a single complex eye!
So I challenge you, Evolutionists, to explain to me how this can happen, bearing in mind that each small step must be an improvement in itself.
Please don’t just barrage me with insults. I’ve heard them all before and they don’t mean anything.
Part 3.Muscles need to develop within the eyeball to control the lens; an iris needs to evolve to control light levels; muscles must develop outside of the eyeball, to make it swivel; a bone structure needs to develop to which these muscles can attach; tear glands are needed to lubricate the eyeball; tear ducts are needed to drain the eye; eyelids are needed to keep it clean. And all of these need to be connected via nerves to the brain, which must be capable of involuntary actions such as
Part 2 that one has, or even could, evolve from the other.
Let me ask you a question: How does the change from a fixed eye, consisting of a spherical indentation lined with light sensitive cells, into a swivelling eye consisting of a ball in a socket, take place by natural selection? The changes involved are huge. This alone would take countless generations and each minute development would be meaningless to the animal concerned. Consider what is necessary.
A response follows in 5 parts. I used to believe this argument and others like it that support Evolution. But then I decided to study the arguments in closer detail. What I found was that there are gaping holes which are just glossed over by those proposing the arguments. People who really want to believe Evolution are happy to accept these arguments as being “scientific and therefore valid”. The fact that there are animals today with eyes varying from simple to highly complex, does not prove
the bible is a first century book when people were using candles too and wiping their asses with straw, were still using bronze age technology, roughly regionally inhabited, thought the earth was the center of the solar system, the world was flat, no modern medicine was invented, and so on and so on.
so what was your point about the 19th century book again? i missed it because your stupidity was blocking it.
Who gives a shit what you think you stone-age, knuckle-dragger? You don't believe in evolution? So you better NEVER visit the doctor EVER again. Modern medicine only makes sense in the light of evolution and genetics.
Do you hear me? You touch ONE modern medicine EVER again and it makes you a wretched liar and hypocrite. Next time you're sick... just pray for your magic fairy to make you better, because you reject all basic modern biology.
@USERNAMEfieldempty Can you give this stone-age knuckle-dragger one example of what you are talking about? One example of a disease when understanding of evolution is essential for the doctors to find a cure?
All current genetic research and their related treatment... which, in 20 years time, will be a vast section of the medical industry. Plus EVERY AREA of modern biologal research stands on the platform of evolution. If you ever touch medicine again you're a vile hypocrite.
Now, go and read about the vagus nerve in giraffe's necks, which disproves ''intelligent design'' so clearly that even an idiot could see it, and stop being such a baby.
@baxteru Evolution happens over a long period of time. So chew on this for a bit. Because the neck of the Giraffe extends so high into the air, the heart must contain an extraordinarily strong pump to force the blood from the lower body to the highest reaches of the brain. Thus, the first capability unique to the giraffe is a heart that is also a most powerful pump. ...continued
@baxteru However, when the giraffe lowers its neck to drink, the blood that is circulating in its neck will suddenly come rushing down by the force of gravity. This sudden rush of blood is so strong, it would quickly cause the giraffe to suffer a brain aneurysm, killing the animal instantly. Therefore, the second capability is that spigots are built into his neck arteries that instantly close down whenever the animal lowers its neck to drink water. ...continued
@baxteru If evolution is true, the giraffe would have to grow this adaption over a long period of time, but the giraffe could not survive without it.
Secondly, when the giraffe abruptly raises its head after drinking, the blood would flow so rapidly downward through the force of gravity that the animal would suffer a sudden loss of blood to the brain, thus causing him to pass out cold. ... continued
@baxteru However, the giraffe has a third capability that prevents this from occurring. The brain has a sponge-like material just behind the brain that has gradually been absorbing blood all the time the giraffe has been drinking. When the giraffe suddenly raises his head, that blood very slowly drains out of the brain, thus keeping the giraffe from passing out, while the spigots open up and the blood begins to flow naturally...continued
@baxteru Three very complicated, but cooperating capabilities had to come together at once in the giraffe.
The giraffe could not survive without any one of these capabilities. If evolution is true, the giraffe got these over time, but whiel they are forming, whenever the giraffe bends down to get a drink, it dies, and dead animals cannot evolve.
and to answer your questions about how evolution is used to find a cure, vaccinations. either one time or constant (like the flu). evolution is used everyday to study the evolution of viruses and often used to predict what possible strand of virus will be evolving in order to create a vaccine for it. Do you know that little thing called AIDS? the reason why there is no known cure because HIV is one of the fastest, constant evolving viruses. therefore no vaccine can cure it because it
is changing constantly. scientists are trying as hard as they can to inhibit or stop the evolution of the virus in order for it to be cured. yeah, they cant figure out anything yet, but at least they arent praying for a cure like some nitwit knuckle-draggers like you. and yeah, never use medicine again, because all if it is based on evolution. then you can die off and clean the gene pool.
@LoLiTzOmg I'm talking about macro-evolution. No creationist deny changes and adaptation. A virus may "evolve" but at the end of the day is still a virus. When your virus grows a hearth give me a message.
viruses dont need to grow hearts. they have been around for billions of years and still are thriving. so why would there be a need to change that? macro evolution isnt used much in medicine because you never really have to cure an adaption to another species. but micro and macro evolution both are based on the same principles. micro evolution is the little steps in between macro evolution. it is just harder to notice because it takes tens of thousands of years to happen.
@LoLiTzOmg Kind of swallowed your tongue there but what you are trying to say is that it was NECESSARY for sexes to appear so that there will be more genetic variation. But that is like putting the horse before the cart.
that is exactly what i am saying. through genetic variation sexes evolved in order to provide more genetic variation, increasing the chances of favorable mutations to occur and even ward off less favorable mutations because of sexual competition.
@LoLiTzOmg You are talking about an effect, a consequence of sexual reproduction. But what is the cause? Why it happened? Was it necessary? I think not. Stop ignoring the issue!
Come on, please, don't pretend I don't have a point!
I don't need to win an argument here. I couldn't care less. I know what I know. And you are not doing much to change my mind. I don't know you. You don't know me. Just think about it with sincerity for yourself.
How does the jelly fish see with those eye spots without a brain though? As humans we need a brain to process the light that comes in through our eyes, so I'm just curious if the jelly fish has something else or what.
7 Will you speak wickedly on God's behalf? Will you speak deceitfully for him?
8 Will you show him partiality? Will you argue the case for God?
9 Would it turn out well if he examined you?Could you deceive him as you might deceive men?10 He would surely rebuke you if you secretly showed partiality. 11 Would not his splendor terrify you? Would not the dread of him fall on you?
@dlockcarr holes where? and how? There is no god, souls, afterlife, or anything else I would concern myself with. So at 'worst' I see it as disagreeing with people totally ignorant of the topic at hand, which I can live with.
ok I don't want to sound immature because these are greats vids but at 0:46 that monkey is seriously wanking himself. There's no doubt. Just made me lol pretty hard.
Leehofooks, Thanks for that reply, I guess I could still get a degree that way, even though I am getting older, I could take classes in fields that would truly interest me, and eventually get a degree in what I would like to do, instead of going to a technical college that I sometimes consider doing, that have classes in careers that don't truly interest me completely.
Eyes developed in the various varieties of organisms, I find that a good evidence for the scientific proof that God exists. He created the eye for many creatures, and watched thier evolutionary processes, and "saw" that it was good.
scottandmonica, the very fact that we even exist in the universe is like science fiction! You should study evidence for Biblical archeology as well, there is proof of the Bible as well, you may then also come to believe that a intelligent Creator, created us. I have come to that conclusion in my own search for the truth about our existence. I have the right to state my own opinion here as well, and I hope I have added something to a interesting debate.
@janande1 archeological evidence for the bible only proves that some of the text was written by people present at that time; it is not proof that god exists.
satanstoolshed, the archeological evidence from those past people, can proove God's existence, because they were recording records of thier very history at thier time, that was also recorded in the Bible. I think that it is some very good archeological proof of Biblical history.
@paintballer7449 where is your CONCRETE proof that santa clause doesnt exist? oh what, hes a sociologically derived human myth? hhhmmm seems pretty concrete to me
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I came to the conclusion of the existence of God, through reading the entire Holy Bible, coming to my own conclusions, feeling born again, researching, and studying other ideas as well, such as Darwinism. Darwin was perplexed by the amazing eye evolvement as well, and made a argument to explain, written in this informative u-tube video, about eye evolution. Now here is something to contemplate, how can you disprove that a intelligent Creator doesn't exist, to create creatures, and thier eyes?
@janande1 the bible is not evidence that god exists, youre deluded feelings that he exists is not proof; logic and reason lead to the inevitable conclusion that god is an imaginary character in a sociologically constructed myth.
youre feelings that evolution isnt true isnt proof that it isnt true; the REAMS of evidence found by scientists is proof that it is fact. can you provide material physical proof that god exists?
satanstoolshed, I would like to say that I believe in evolution, just also, that God was seeing that it was good over time, He probably caused some of the genetic mutations, that changed the evolutionary process of different species. Also I believe that Bible study, and archeological evidence can proove God's existence.
messiahjohns, how do you explain how this science, of the amazingness of nature, has come into being a reality? It seems rather supernatural. And I also want to say, that I have a self taught knowledge on many subjects, I just need a degree in one, so I can make a good living at it. And monsters DO live under my bed! LOL! And under your bed too, they are called little dust mites, and fungus, and bacteria, that God uses to keep the world in balance, for it's ecological balances! LOL!
I have a lot of faith in the truth of the discoveries of Ron Wyatt, and I think most of his claims were well proven scientifically, a couple of them, I agree with you, required extraordinary proof to be varified. I would love to go to college, and maybe or maybe not, I might get SOME help financially with that, and who knows how many intelligent peoples minds have gone to waste because college is too expensive for them, because of the unintelligent idea of costly colleges...
If you are so much wiser than us, explain to us why evolution is wrong, give us the conclusive evidence for it. We can't wait to learn from your immense wisdom. So we could get rid of that "imagination".
Bad times for me :(, looks like ive gotta start taking life too seriously before i open my mouth! I do defend my orgional statement though. Although, while being irreducibly complex, they also disprove the existance of god, because i mean....why? so many things about them just raise the question....why?
Don't beat yourself up too much there... the only thing I don't agree with is your statement that things are irreducibly complex. That notion is completely unfounded, especially given the mounds of evidence available that CLEARLY shows evolution.
Lol, mate i am a firm believer in evolution and an athiest, I was cracking a joke about how gentlemen, find women to be rather complex creatures. I thought the term "irreducibly complex" was rather ironic and topical given the subject of the video. That is all.
god just reading these comments depresses me. What has this world come too. I think all people who don't believe in evolution, shouldn't be allowed to use any of the scientific achivements, acomplished because of the understanding of evolution. Like most modern medicine for example.
Go do your own research instead of listening to the stupid propaganda your church or whatever gives you.
ratxt1 1 month ago
How explaining the variety of eyes, benefits of eyes and increase in survival, prove evolution at all?? In part 1, the narrator said "Scientists don't know why they evolve light sensitive eyes". In Part 4 it says "eyes are connected to the brain". And that's it. They should discuss about optic nerves and visual cortex more, or the interpretation of signal and impulse that create image. They have 45 minutes and it's more than enough but they opted to discuss it in 3 seconds.
hisham031170 2 months ago
@hisham031170 remember its a TV show, meant to be interesting to watch to the general public.
they can't make it too complicated otherwise only a few people would watch it
The1andOnlyCG 1 week ago
Why do you care? I am perfectly willing to accept that I am "star-stuff" given order and meaning by random chance, but, out of that same order, we then feel compelled to give order and meaning to that random chance because we have to feel that our tiny lives have significance outside ourselves? It IS frightening to be a mote on a speck lost in eternity, but it is the case, and, sorry for the inconvenience, that's all there is.
Scyllax 2 months ago
Hahaha, this is a joke!, the eye did not evolve!, it was designed!, Natural seclection has no increase of DNA!, that debunks darwins theory right there!, Also genes cannot meutate indefinetly!
darwinism is fraud people!.
85Aheadstix 3 months ago
@85Aheadstix ahh so there must be a magical infinite god who just popped out of nowhere and exists in a non-physical spiritual world which is totally undetectable on any basis and defies everything we know about the universe to a ridiculous extent but we KNOW its there because an ancient book told us.
The1andOnlyCG 1 week ago
@BayAreaAtheist there are videos about this kind of thing. The problem is that evolutionists like propaganda. This theory has to be pushed on people at all levels simply because the evidence for it is wholly lacking. It's a collection of interesting stories and suppositions on how things would have worked with their theory. It's sad, but its easy to understand why people don't see the errors in their reasoning when they need to believe in a completely natural world.
semitope 5 months ago
If you don't see that all you are doing is making up a story. Maybe you should take on the evolution of the hummingbird next. Or the bombardier beetle, or the woodpecker. Find some made up story about that
semitope 5 months ago
This doesn't show eye evolution still. smh at the low level of reasoning used by evolutionists.
semitope 5 months ago
just ignore the people who deny evolution. These people deny evolution because of religious beliefs. I used to deny evolution too, but that was when i was a christian. I studied evolution on my own and found out that it made sense. These evolution vs creation arguments go on and on, with each side bashing each other, and no one ever wins. This is not an evolution vs creation video. So chill off and ignore them. ......and also, Eyevolution is very amazing lol.
bluemime86 7 months ago
@bluemime86 Hahaha, deny evolutiuon?, so what your gonna deny Dr Francis collins?, the head of the Human genome?, who i might add is a christian with ph.D in Bio chemisty and genetics, he accredits God for designing the DNA, he says no random chance made something that complex, its IMPOSSIBLE!
you might wanna check out Dr Michael denton ph.D in Bio chemisty and M.D, he says there is no substantial evidence for evolution, and hes an evolutionist!.
You know nothing!, dawkins fanboy.
85Aheadstix 1 week ago
Too bad, the video must be remade. Australian teem found complex eyes in the early Cambrian. So much for slow changes through genetic mutations filtered by natural selection.
mejc2 7 months ago
@mejc2 You have misunderstood the findings. These were arthropod eye impression suggesting incomplete sclerotisation. Their disarticulation allowed for phosphatisation with no evidence of biomineralisation indicating chitin.
There is no issue for eye evolution with this discovery.
djarm67 7 months ago 13
@djarm67
You misunderstand the finding. This discovery changes the entire theory. It eliminates slow primitive adaptations through mutation and natural selection. It forces you to change to rapid changes. Not only do these eyes suggest more advanced vision than previously predicted, they also insinuate advanced locomotion, predatory instincts, digestion systems, advanced neural connections and brain activity. All produced in a geologic twinkling of an eye.
mejc2 7 months ago
@mejc2 lol. No it doesn't. The finding is completely consistent with evolutionary theory. Your source is misleading you.
djarm67 7 months ago 8
@djarm67
The finding is completely inconsistent with the Darwinian process. However, no worries. Evolutionists will make up a new story to fit the evidence. They are already claiming super fast evolution occurred in the Cambrian period. Their evidence is the advanced forms found in the lower levels. No slow gradual primitive adaptations, Sudden appearance. So Super fast evolution is the answer obviously. However this is not science, this is man making up stories to support their beliefs.
mejc2 7 months ago
@mejc2 Your misunderstanding of the Emu Bay fossils is understandable when your sources are misrepesenting them to you. The fossils are completely consistent with what we expect.
djarm67 7 months ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
@djarm67
My sources?
# Lee, M. S. Y. et al. 2011. Modern optics in exceptionally preserved eyes of Early Cambrian arthropods from Australia. Nature. 474 (7353): 631-634.
Try to keep up sonny.
mejc2 7 months ago
@mejc2 the evolution can be fast that is why we call it Cambrian Explotion. When a group of living beings finds a new echosystem they evolve more quickly.
shadowmax889 7 months ago
@shadowmax889
Evolution? Genetic entropy is empirical. Evolution is impossible. Devolution is observed. Mutations cannot and have never been observed to create new organs or body plans.
mejc2 7 months ago
@mejc2 there is evidence it happened you are just closing your eyes to it. Fosil registers and genetic markers show how organs evolve and new body plans form previews ones
shadowmax889 7 months ago
@shadowmax889
Fossil evidence refutes Darwinian Evolution. Also, human genetic mutation rates are far too high for the species to be as old as Darwinism claims and will go extinct within the next hundred generations.
mejc2 7 months ago
@mejc2 wich fossils??? why you think that the rate of mutations are to high?? because last time i check the majority of mutations have no impact in fenotipe and cell function becuase 98% of the DNA is non coding DNA. The fossil evidence shows what we espect form evolution, the complex eyes (like insects) you mention are the most simple kind of eyes out there if you find a mamalian type of eye in cambrian i will belive you.
shadowmax889 7 months ago
@mejc2 a geologic twinkle of an eye is still millions of years
stupidtrooper501 4 months ago
@mejc2 You're pathetic.
Drgamedood 7 months ago
@Drgamedood
Prophetic is more like it.
mejc2 7 months ago
@mejc2 Idiotic is more like it.
Drgamedood 6 months ago
Part 5 What I am looking for is a reasoned answer to a reasoned question. Prove to me that Evolutionists can think for themselves and not just swallow some half-cocked story with no substance. I now know I did that for many years, but now, it seems to me that the thinking person’s only option is to reject Evolution, based on the arguments provided to support it
stevew1904 4 months ago
Part 4. controlling the lens and iris. All this must happen before the swiveling eye can function. And not only that, it has to happen twice, because I don’t know of any animal with a single complex eye!
So I challenge you, Evolutionists, to explain to me how this can happen, bearing in mind that each small step must be an improvement in itself.
Please don’t just barrage me with insults. I’ve heard them all before and they don’t mean anything.
stevew1904 4 months ago
Part 3.Muscles need to develop within the eyeball to control the lens; an iris needs to evolve to control light levels; muscles must develop outside of the eyeball, to make it swivel; a bone structure needs to develop to which these muscles can attach; tear glands are needed to lubricate the eyeball; tear ducts are needed to drain the eye; eyelids are needed to keep it clean. And all of these need to be connected via nerves to the brain, which must be capable of involuntary actions such as
stevew1904 4 months ago
Part 2 that one has, or even could, evolve from the other.
Let me ask you a question: How does the change from a fixed eye, consisting of a spherical indentation lined with light sensitive cells, into a swivelling eye consisting of a ball in a socket, take place by natural selection? The changes involved are huge. This alone would take countless generations and each minute development would be meaningless to the animal concerned. Consider what is necessary.
stevew1904 4 months ago
A response follows in 5 parts. I used to believe this argument and others like it that support Evolution. But then I decided to study the arguments in closer detail. What I found was that there are gaping holes which are just glossed over by those proposing the arguments. People who really want to believe Evolution are happy to accept these arguments as being “scientific and therefore valid”. The fact that there are animals today with eyes varying from simple to highly complex, does not prove
stevew1904 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bigmanoooo1 Please, everyone, thumbs up for this comment.
baxteru 8 months ago
@bigmanoooo1 No man! I'm totally ignorant! Can you teach me?
baxteru 8 months ago
@bigmanoooo1 ok give me one example that proves this theory is correct.
baxteru 8 months ago
@bigmanoooo1 no, better you read the Bible, it will answer all your life queries.
origin of species is a 19th century book when people walked on the back of horses and read at the light of the candle.
evolution is a gnostic myth and never happened.
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
the bible is a first century book when people were using candles too and wiping their asses with straw, were still using bronze age technology, roughly regionally inhabited, thought the earth was the center of the solar system, the world was flat, no modern medicine was invented, and so on and so on.
so what was your point about the 19th century book again? i missed it because your stupidity was blocking it.
LoLiTzOmg 8 months ago
I agree with evolution theorists on one point: "It's based on mistakes."
baxteru 9 months ago
@baxteru
Who gives a shit what you think you stone-age, knuckle-dragger? You don't believe in evolution? So you better NEVER visit the doctor EVER again. Modern medicine only makes sense in the light of evolution and genetics.
Do you hear me? You touch ONE modern medicine EVER again and it makes you a wretched liar and hypocrite. Next time you're sick... just pray for your magic fairy to make you better, because you reject all basic modern biology.
USERNAMEfieldempty 8 months ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty Can you give this stone-age knuckle-dragger one example of what you are talking about? One example of a disease when understanding of evolution is essential for the doctors to find a cure?
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru Fuck off retard.
All current genetic research and their related treatment... which, in 20 years time, will be a vast section of the medical industry. Plus EVERY AREA of modern biologal research stands on the platform of evolution. If you ever touch medicine again you're a vile hypocrite.
Now, go and read about the vagus nerve in giraffe's necks, which disproves ''intelligent design'' so clearly that even an idiot could see it, and stop being such a baby.
USERNAMEfieldempty 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@USERNAMEfieldempty This anti-ID claim is based on ignorance because of theese two facts:
fact 1) Vagus nerve branches all over its path
fact 2) larynx control system has to prevent drowning in saliva and food
A designer has two basic options:
a) Make one nerve to gather data from the larynx+trachea and other to control the larynx, or
b) He could make one nerve to regulate itself, like a closed loop
I think that 'b' is more optimal and allows a parasympathetic control
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru Evolution happens over a long period of time. So chew on this for a bit. Because the neck of the Giraffe extends so high into the air, the heart must contain an extraordinarily strong pump to force the blood from the lower body to the highest reaches of the brain. Thus, the first capability unique to the giraffe is a heart that is also a most powerful pump. ...continued
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru However, when the giraffe lowers its neck to drink, the blood that is circulating in its neck will suddenly come rushing down by the force of gravity. This sudden rush of blood is so strong, it would quickly cause the giraffe to suffer a brain aneurysm, killing the animal instantly. Therefore, the second capability is that spigots are built into his neck arteries that instantly close down whenever the animal lowers its neck to drink water. ...continued
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru If evolution is true, the giraffe would have to grow this adaption over a long period of time, but the giraffe could not survive without it.
Secondly, when the giraffe abruptly raises its head after drinking, the blood would flow so rapidly downward through the force of gravity that the animal would suffer a sudden loss of blood to the brain, thus causing him to pass out cold. ... continued
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru However, the giraffe has a third capability that prevents this from occurring. The brain has a sponge-like material just behind the brain that has gradually been absorbing blood all the time the giraffe has been drinking. When the giraffe suddenly raises his head, that blood very slowly drains out of the brain, thus keeping the giraffe from passing out, while the spigots open up and the blood begins to flow naturally...continued
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru Three very complicated, but cooperating capabilities had to come together at once in the giraffe.
The giraffe could not survive without any one of these capabilities. If evolution is true, the giraffe got these over time, but whiel they are forming, whenever the giraffe bends down to get a drink, it dies, and dead animals cannot evolve.
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru
and to answer your questions about how evolution is used to find a cure, vaccinations. either one time or constant (like the flu). evolution is used everyday to study the evolution of viruses and often used to predict what possible strand of virus will be evolving in order to create a vaccine for it. Do you know that little thing called AIDS? the reason why there is no known cure because HIV is one of the fastest, constant evolving viruses. therefore no vaccine can cure it because it
LoLiTzOmg 8 months ago
@LoLiTzOmg
is changing constantly. scientists are trying as hard as they can to inhibit or stop the evolution of the virus in order for it to be cured. yeah, they cant figure out anything yet, but at least they arent praying for a cure like some nitwit knuckle-draggers like you. and yeah, never use medicine again, because all if it is based on evolution. then you can die off and clean the gene pool.
LoLiTzOmg 8 months ago
@LoLiTzOmg I'm talking about macro-evolution. No creationist deny changes and adaptation. A virus may "evolve" but at the end of the day is still a virus. When your virus grows a hearth give me a message.
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru
viruses dont need to grow hearts. they have been around for billions of years and still are thriving. so why would there be a need to change that? macro evolution isnt used much in medicine because you never really have to cure an adaption to another species. but micro and macro evolution both are based on the same principles. micro evolution is the little steps in between macro evolution. it is just harder to notice because it takes tens of thousands of years to happen.
LoLiTzOmg 8 months ago
@LoLiTzOmg So you think that evolution is determined by necessity? Was it necessary for sexes to evolve?
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru
genetic variation
LoLiTzOmg 8 months ago
@LoLiTzOmg Kind of swallowed your tongue there but what you are trying to say is that it was NECESSARY for sexes to appear so that there will be more genetic variation. But that is like putting the horse before the cart.
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru
that is exactly what i am saying. through genetic variation sexes evolved in order to provide more genetic variation, increasing the chances of favorable mutations to occur and even ward off less favorable mutations because of sexual competition.
LoLiTzOmg 8 months ago
@LoLiTzOmg You are talking about an effect, a consequence of sexual reproduction. But what is the cause? Why it happened? Was it necessary? I think not. Stop ignoring the issue!
Come on, please, don't pretend I don't have a point!
I don't need to win an argument here. I couldn't care less. I know what I know. And you are not doing much to change my mind. I don't know you. You don't know me. Just think about it with sincerity for yourself.
baxteru 8 months ago
@baxteru
btw, thanks for acknowledging that i was putting the horse before the cart. cuz i am pretty sure that is how it works.
LoLiTzOmg 8 months ago
Dude your channel is so awesome.
demonella 9 months ago
@franklindelanobluth0 I also wish that i had no need for glasses :(
Kitty666gothemo 9 months ago
lol epic cliffhanger ending!
HyperSweety18 10 months ago
How does the jelly fish see with those eye spots without a brain though? As humans we need a brain to process the light that comes in through our eyes, so I'm just curious if the jelly fish has something else or what.
Mclovin171 11 months ago
@Mclovin171 well, the jelly fish is a loose bunch of nerves..lols.
111E982a 11 months ago
VIVA LA EVOLUTION!!!!
kiddhitta 1 year ago
religion = human ideology
great videos btw!
JOESGONNAKILLY0U 1 year ago
Plz keep ur god and jesus crap our of these science forums plz..
RottenNinja 1 year ago 17
I can't wait till genetic allows us to alter human eyes with eagle eyes
Orlando2914 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
7 Will you speak wickedly on God's behalf? Will you speak deceitfully for him?
8 Will you show him partiality? Will you argue the case for God?
9 Would it turn out well if he examined you?Could you deceive him as you might deceive men?10 He would surely rebuke you if you secretly showed partiality. 11 Would not his splendor terrify you? Would not the dread of him fall on you?
dlockcarr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mordinvan
Job 13:1-11 1 "My eyes have seen all this, my ears have heard and understood it.
2 What you know, I also know; I am not inferior to you.
3 But I desire to speak to the Almighty and to argue my case with God. 4 You, however, smear me with lies; you are worthless physicians, all of you!
5 If only you would be altogether silent! For you, that would be wisdom.
6 Hear now my argument; listen to the plea of my lips.
dlockcarr 1 year ago
you evolutionist are just digging your wholes deeper and deeper
dlockcarr 2 years ago
you creationists can't spell. Guess that makes us about even...
shaun365 2 years ago
@dlockcarr holes where? and how? There is no god, souls, afterlife, or anything else I would concern myself with. So at 'worst' I see it as disagreeing with people totally ignorant of the topic at hand, which I can live with.
mordinvan 1 year ago
ok I don't want to sound immature because these are greats vids but at 0:46 that monkey is seriously wanking himself. There's no doubt. Just made me lol pretty hard.
mythrilite 2 years ago
I love these videos, but seriously! Must they explain what natural selection is in EVERY episode?
garrettducat 2 years ago
Leehofooks, Thanks for that reply, I guess I could still get a degree that way, even though I am getting older, I could take classes in fields that would truly interest me, and eventually get a degree in what I would like to do, instead of going to a technical college that I sometimes consider doing, that have classes in careers that don't truly interest me completely.
janande1 2 years ago
Wooo Monterey!
I live there!
superfisto 2 years ago
Thanks a lot for posting!
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
That audio bit around 8:30 was so poorly editted. Oh my god, that was painful to listen to. haha
Anyway, this looks like the rest is gonna be good.
TomConger 2 years ago
Eyes developed in the various varieties of organisms, I find that a good evidence for the scientific proof that God exists. He created the eye for many creatures, and watched thier evolutionary processes, and "saw" that it was good.
janande1 2 years ago
@janande1
THIS I SCIENCE PROGRAM, NOT A "SCI FI" ONE!. Go away!.
scottandmonica 2 years ago
scottandmonica, the very fact that we even exist in the universe is like science fiction! You should study evidence for Biblical archeology as well, there is proof of the Bible as well, you may then also come to believe that a intelligent Creator, created us. I have come to that conclusion in my own search for the truth about our existence. I have the right to state my own opinion here as well, and I hope I have added something to a interesting debate.
janande1 2 years ago
@janande1 archeological evidence for the bible only proves that some of the text was written by people present at that time; it is not proof that god exists.
satanstoolshed 2 years ago 2
satanstoolshed, the archeological evidence from those past people, can proove God's existence, because they were recording records of thier very history at thier time, that was also recorded in the Bible. I think that it is some very good archeological proof of Biblical history.
janande1 2 years ago
@janande1 wrong, its proof that those people lived in that time and thats it; you need to go study the scientific method. god is imaginary
satanstoolshed 2 years ago
@satanstoolshed
i usually stay out of the "God fights" but where is your CONCRETE proof God dosent exist?
paintballer7449 2 years ago
@paintballer7449 where is your CONCRETE proof that santa clause doesnt exist? oh what, hes a sociologically derived human myth? hhhmmm seems pretty concrete to me
satanstoolshed 2 years ago 2
@paintballer7449 well many turn to the design of the universe rather than biological design. you should listen to hugh ross.
badass1163 1 year ago
@janande1:
oh you poor brainwashed christian. Your post reveals that you don't understand what scientific proof really is.
personalsinr 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I came to the conclusion of the existence of God, through reading the entire Holy Bible, coming to my own conclusions, feeling born again, researching, and studying other ideas as well, such as Darwinism. Darwin was perplexed by the amazing eye evolvement as well, and made a argument to explain, written in this informative u-tube video, about eye evolution. Now here is something to contemplate, how can you disprove that a intelligent Creator doesn't exist, to create creatures, and thier eyes?
janande1 2 years ago
@janande1 the bible is not evidence that god exists, youre deluded feelings that he exists is not proof; logic and reason lead to the inevitable conclusion that god is an imaginary character in a sociologically constructed myth.
youre feelings that evolution isnt true isnt proof that it isnt true; the REAMS of evidence found by scientists is proof that it is fact. can you provide material physical proof that god exists?
satanstoolshed 2 years ago 3
satanstoolshed, I would like to say that I believe in evolution, just also, that God was seeing that it was good over time, He probably caused some of the genetic mutations, that changed the evolutionary process of different species. Also I believe that Bible study, and archeological evidence can proove God's existence.
janande1 2 years ago
@janande1 read the blind watchmaker
satanstoolshed 2 years ago
LOL!
Science is the study and explaination of nature...
Not the supernatural.
There is nothing in science that points toward a god...
gods are of the supernatural.
To even suggest this calls into question your critical thinking skills and level of education.
You may as well claim that the fuzzy balls of dust and hair under your bed are proof that monsters live under there.
messiahjonz 2 years ago
messiahjohns, how do you explain how this science, of the amazingness of nature, has come into being a reality? It seems rather supernatural. And I also want to say, that I have a self taught knowledge on many subjects, I just need a degree in one, so I can make a good living at it. And monsters DO live under my bed! LOL! And under your bed too, they are called little dust mites, and fungus, and bacteria, that God uses to keep the world in balance, for it's ecological balances! LOL!
janande1 2 years ago
The name is messiahjonz
(messiah jones)
Science has come into reality through the hard work, observations and hypothesis followed by testing of human beings.
If it were to be supernatural then science could never be tested, for science is the study of natural, not the supernatural.
I admire you wanting to educate yourself, but please get into a university.
As for monsters... what you call monsters, I call lifeforms
gods are the true monsters, they create and destroy for pleasure
messiahjonz 2 years ago
I understand that you are a born again xian... but to believe the claims of the late Ron Wyatt is shameful.
Ron Wyatt was nothing more than a lying charlatan.
He claimed to have found Sodom and Gamorah, Noah's ark, the ark of the covenent, Mt Sinai, the holy grail, etc.
Please, I beg you to get into a university and stop being lazy in your thinking.
If this is the type of self teaching you are speaking of you have to forget it all and start over.
messiahjonz 2 years ago 2
messiahjonz,
I have a lot of faith in the truth of the discoveries of Ron Wyatt, and I think most of his claims were well proven scientifically, a couple of them, I agree with you, required extraordinary proof to be varified. I would love to go to college, and maybe or maybe not, I might get SOME help financially with that, and who knows how many intelligent peoples minds have gone to waste because college is too expensive for them, because of the unintelligent idea of costly colleges...
janande1 2 years ago
I agree, post high school for everyone that wants it would benefit everyone and every country. I hope you get the opportunity to do so.
Having said that, reading what you said,
"I have a lot of faith in the truth of the discoveries of Ron Wyatt..."
I hope we can agree that "faith" is belief without evidence.
Wyatt is a documented nutjob that has lied for decades, and his site continues his lies after his death
Check into his claims rather than believing what perpetuates your beliefs
messiahjonz 2 years ago
Then if it is so "good" why do I have the need for glasses?
franklindelanobluth0 1 year ago
I actually saw this one on TV.
It is a really good one.
buzzausa 2 years ago
Damn this was a cool video!
juggaloryan3 2 years ago
Comment removed
dayati 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Imagine if evolution was true... alas it is only your imagnination.
theanswersofnwo3 2 years ago
You don't understand what evolution is!
BEAST636 2 years ago
Imagine if you were open to any sort of reason or logic. . . Alas it is only your imagination.
manhunt48 2 years ago 3
If you are so much wiser than us, explain to us why evolution is wrong, give us the conclusive evidence for it. We can't wait to learn from your immense wisdom. So we could get rid of that "imagination".
creationismisstupid 2 years ago
wymyns are irreducibly complex structures. ZING.w
revolvingdoo 2 years ago 5
@revolvingdoo nobody got your joke... LOL, they give you thumbs down just for mentioning the phrase "irreducibly complex."
Indeed women (wymyn) are irreducibly complex! LOL HAHA
ozpowermo 2 years ago 2
Bad times for me :(, looks like ive gotta start taking life too seriously before i open my mouth! I do defend my orgional statement though. Although, while being irreducibly complex, they also disprove the existance of god, because i mean....why? so many things about them just raise the question....why?
revolvingdoo 2 years ago
@revolvingdoo
Don't beat yourself up too much there... the only thing I don't agree with is your statement that things are irreducibly complex. That notion is completely unfounded, especially given the mounds of evidence available that CLEARLY shows evolution.
ozpowermo 2 years ago
Lol, mate i am a firm believer in evolution and an athiest, I was cracking a joke about how gentlemen, find women to be rather complex creatures. I thought the term "irreducibly complex" was rather ironic and topical given the subject of the video. That is all.
revolvingdoo 2 years ago
@revolvingdoo
Damn you POE! LOL, I forgot about my earlier comment about the irreducibly complex women ;), hehe, cheers!
ozpowermo 2 years ago
But I thought the eye was an irreducibly complex structure duh-huh :p
naughtypagan72 2 years ago 8
Evolution for the win
Zygorhiza 2 years ago 29
Great video
hossrex 2 years ago 12
Evidence FTW!
geminyo 2 years ago 41