@thedonali1 putting on it information never seen before? information that later has been confirmed by diferent instruments countless times? explain me how do you do that?
Pretending you don't understand weakens your already lost position in this issue or any of the other main points of the Moon Hoax.The people who have proven Apollo was a hoax,said there are no pictures with stars implying clearly there are no pictures astronomical comparable to prove the location of the camera and whether there is any human operate it. And don't bother to reply to me idiot.
@potrodsas These pictures prove not only the location, but also the time of where and when the camera was located. As to why they prove such a thing is somewhat technical and hard to understand (watch the video and it explains it quite well)..
In addition to the UV photography there are photos in which Venus can be seen very faintly. (If you are interested I can dig up the catalogue numbers so you can inspect them yourself) The location is consistent with where it should be at the time.
@potrodsas "The people who have proven Apollo was a hoax,said there are no pictures with stars implying clearly there are no pictures astronomical comparable to prove the location of the camera and whether there is any human operate it."
That's mainly because they actually have no idea what they are talking about. These same people believe that stars should show up in all the pictures, even though they were taken in daylight conditions resulting in exposures of like 1/500th of a second.
No "maybe" about it - these shots were literally impossible to forge.
There were no other UV observatories in orbit at the time. When they were eventually launched, they checked the UV light magnitudes of the stars shot by Apollo 16 (which are different from visible light magnitudes) and guess what? They matched.
Also: The photograph of the Earth taken from the Moon in UV light, clearly shows an alignment of background stars which prove the date, time and location at which the shot was taken.
This is a great one for Black History month. Good job. I'd not heard of Dr. Carruthers and it turns out his contribution to the Apollo missions may well be the conclusive proof that man stepped foot on the Moon.
If u can build all that space stuff I'm sure u cam tamper with a picture
thedonali1 6 months ago
@thedonali1 putting on it information never seen before? information that later has been confirmed by diferent instruments countless times? explain me how do you do that?
jonismack1 6 months ago
Don't see allot of hoaxheads jumping to get at this video....Wonder why?
Great work on this one Thx.
Tweekerhead 9 months ago
Pretending you don't understand weakens your already lost position in this issue or any of the other main points of the Moon Hoax.The people who have proven Apollo was a hoax,said there are no pictures with stars implying clearly there are no pictures astronomical comparable to prove the location of the camera and whether there is any human operate it. And don't bother to reply to me idiot.
potrodsas 10 months ago
@potrodsas These pictures prove not only the location, but also the time of where and when the camera was located. As to why they prove such a thing is somewhat technical and hard to understand (watch the video and it explains it quite well)..
In addition to the UV photography there are photos in which Venus can be seen very faintly. (If you are interested I can dig up the catalogue numbers so you can inspect them yourself) The location is consistent with where it should be at the time.
SirMildred76 10 months ago
@potrodsas "The people who have proven Apollo was a hoax,said there are no pictures with stars implying clearly there are no pictures astronomical comparable to prove the location of the camera and whether there is any human operate it."
That's mainly because they actually have no idea what they are talking about. These same people believe that stars should show up in all the pictures, even though they were taken in daylight conditions resulting in exposures of like 1/500th of a second.
SirMildred76 8 months ago
No "maybe" about it - these shots were literally impossible to forge.
There were no other UV observatories in orbit at the time. When they were eventually launched, they checked the UV light magnitudes of the stars shot by Apollo 16 (which are different from visible light magnitudes) and guess what? They matched.
Also: The photograph of the Earth taken from the Moon in UV light, clearly shows an alignment of background stars which prove the date, time and location at which the shot was taken.
GlowWorm1962 10 months ago
This is a great one for Black History month. Good job. I'd not heard of Dr. Carruthers and it turns out his contribution to the Apollo missions may well be the conclusive proof that man stepped foot on the Moon.
Purpleplanetar17 11 months ago