@kittenbut1, I'm sorry, but this is what you sound like:
"Nyah nyah I googled geisha culture and you didn't, I like Japan more than you do, so take that, random youtuber."
Dude. It's a movie. They never get details right and 95% of the time it doesn't matter. The movie never claimed to be historically accurate, it's just entertainment. It's a pretty movie. Calm down.
Every since Ive seen this movie it has become one of my all time favorites and Ive always wanted to do a lyrical ballet type dance with these type of fans, I just don't know where to get the fans from
@kittenbut1 also if you had watched the extras for the movie you would know that the designer wanted to modernise the traditional look of a Geisha for a western view. The lips were made fuller for example to relate to the idea of fuller lips being more attractive in a western culture. I agree that it is not the most historically accurate film, but we are not watching a history film, we are watching memoirs of a Geisha!! ps. I LOVE JAPAN!
@smithamymae absolutely right! The movie wanted to capture the feeling of something that is breathtakingly beautiful and impressive. It doesn't have to be perfectly accurate.
For these complainers saying "It's wrong I'm clever listen to me you don't respect the culture as much as I do" etc etc whine whine whine. All I can say is: learn to contextualise. If you'd read the book, you'd know why the hair and dress were different or "wrong" as you call them.
I think... If she was about wielding her hands she should have chosen another dance: Lithuanian, Gypsian, Russian, wear normal clother *suited for her movements* and that even might be beautiful.
@PINKluvr01 Its wrong from the historical view...but for the book it is right. it was said that Hatsumomo would leave peices dangling...and would wear her hair in a sloppy manner that was unbecoming for geisha.
I finally saw the movie and it took my breath away. It's a wonderful story as wonderful as the book. I view each work separately and I have no problem with either ending. Both book and movie are a rich tapestry of human emotions, love, dreams, fate...I'm ready to fall in love again after...10 years!
My ex-girlfriend played background, but I couldn't see her. At least, I couldn't distinctly recognize her. My guess is that she appeared in the scene at the bridge when the Chairman meets Sayuri for the first time. My impression of the film? It is EXQUISITE! Beautiful!
I loved the book, but I haven't been able to see this movie because it will stab me in the heart. The reason? My ex-girlfriend is in the movie. So what? Well, she left me in order to be in this movie. The irony? Although she is Japanese, she had not heard of the book until I gave it to her as a present nine years ago in 1998. Six months later, she met Arthur Golden through me at my company's party. I still love her.
Well, it is wrong. The hair styles are not right for one.maiko have explicity hair styles, these look like puffy buns. Also, her lips are fully painted which indicates her as a senior maiko but she has the dangling flowers of a first year maiko. Mineko even said herself this story is potrayed wrong. I apperciate the culture more than you seeing as you rely on a movie.
thank you so much for clarifying that! You said it best! Not all understand the differences. So yes you are smart, and they need to pick up a book themselves. That was funny, and refreshing to hear someone else understand what they were seeing. I agree it was wrong. It was also wrong to use chinese characters. I am sure there are talented japanese women who could have doen these roles. Being American Indian I can understand the frustration one may have on this movie though it was good.
Thanks :) I apperciate and research about them. The movie was romantic but it wasn't what a geisha or maiko is supposed to be. I am hurt that sometimes people defend it as an actual reality.I agree, using the chinese characters in the movie as well was weird, and the fact it was in Japan and was spoken in english. At least in "My Geisha" Where a caucasian woman pretended to be a Japanese, they spoke Japanese in it and so did she. That was an old movie, why can't they do movies normally?
I have researched about them and understand the differences between maiko and geisha, unfortunately there are many who entertain without concrete facts (for show, beauty, stardom, or whatever) deleting facts which are just as interesting. As much as peolpe "learned" from this movie, they could have been just as interested in the truth.
@kittenbut1 Well yea, but the woman who plays Sayuri is Chinese. And I think the movie would've been more beautiful if they'd all speak Japanese. But this is Hollywood. We don't get real culture.
@kittenbut1 I completely agree that the movie isn't full to the book nor is it COMPLETELY accurate to the way geisha, but the director did it on purpose to make the appearance more appealing to americans.
@kittenbut1 The director said they were looking to show the geisha with a sort of Paris runway inspired change to the more traditional appearance. It's like when they did the film Hua Mulan: It is based on a poem , but in the poem there is no love story. Yet the director put a love story in as his little twist. No idea why they do it but I know what you're getting at. It annoys me too.
@kittenbut1 You are definitely right about the hairstyles. But I still love the movie. As a film, its amazing and it opened up a whole new culture to me. As for the lips, I don't think hers are fully painted. Its just the white covers the portion thats not painted which makes it look like just part of the skin. So I'm not sure you're right on that but you definitely could be. But you have your facts straight and I'm happy someone did research too! =D
Mineko Iwasaki spoke with Arthur Golden, and he used some elements of what she said to him. Sayuri, though, is a completely fictional character, and what Golden used is, mostly, not personnal events from Iwasaki's life but rather background information on geiko/maiko.
Read Iwasaki's books (her autobiography is translated in english) if you want to know about her life, which is extremely different and not even in the same period as Sayuri's fictional one.
It's true. The Geisha elements were adapted to Western taste. I like it. But those who insist that it's the real thing are ignorant. They said it was their interpretation even in the extras of the DVD.
Are you kidding me? This it not a geisha from Gion, like the book and the mvie says. Is a oiran!
porta0toda1la2vida 1 day ago
@kittenbut1, I'm sorry, but this is what you sound like:
"Nyah nyah I googled geisha culture and you didn't, I like Japan more than you do, so take that, random youtuber."
Dude. It's a movie. They never get details right and 95% of the time it doesn't matter. The movie never claimed to be historically accurate, it's just entertainment. It's a pretty movie. Calm down.
cheekylilsnotrag 1 week ago
LOVE THIS MOVIE!!!
487Cindy 1 month ago
Every since Ive seen this movie it has become one of my all time favorites and Ive always wanted to do a lyrical ballet type dance with these type of fans, I just don't know where to get the fans from
goodytwoshoesdancer 1 month ago
@kittenbut1 also if you had watched the extras for the movie you would know that the designer wanted to modernise the traditional look of a Geisha for a western view. The lips were made fuller for example to relate to the idea of fuller lips being more attractive in a western culture. I agree that it is not the most historically accurate film, but we are not watching a history film, we are watching memoirs of a Geisha!! ps. I LOVE JAPAN!
smithamymae 2 months ago
@smithamymae absolutely right! The movie wanted to capture the feeling of something that is breathtakingly beautiful and impressive. It doesn't have to be perfectly accurate.
SuperElleBaby 1 month ago
the guitar playing or w.e it is, is beautiful <3
CupcakeAuslyn 4 months ago
to all haters: if you dont like the movie then stop watching it or make your own version after all no one ask 4 your opinion..
dominusmarkus 4 months ago
It is realy a wonderfoul movie ! I Love it :)
But so many thinks are wrong in this movie !! unfortunately...
EinAllesFreak 5 months ago
Over here she is still a Maiko, yes? Her collar is still red. Maikos have red collars while full-fledged geishas have white collars.
ChewyChocs 7 months ago
For these complainers saying "It's wrong I'm clever listen to me you don't respect the culture as much as I do" etc etc whine whine whine. All I can say is: learn to contextualise. If you'd read the book, you'd know why the hair and dress were different or "wrong" as you call them.
TheButterscotchGirl 8 months ago
I have to admit, I LOVE Hatsumomo's kimono during this scene. It's so...gorgeous.
Kitsunegirl1212 8 months ago
I think... If she was about wielding her hands she should have chosen another dance: Lithuanian, Gypsian, Russian, wear normal clother *suited for her movements* and that even might be beautiful.
hopeitwillendup 9 months ago
please tell me name of song anyone
<3
mayaaaaa2008 10 months ago
...
Personally I will just enjoy this movies a thousand times more, and I don't care wether it's realistic or not. It's a FILM guys, NOT reality. *sigh*
YumeYasuu 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the kimonos were easy access for intercourse, doggystyle yellow butt cheeks
KENDALLSTRONG 1 year ago
I really like the melody mamehas played.
Does anyone know the notes to the melody on the shamisen?
Or the name if the melody?
Or is the melody made up for the movie?
mousikaz 1 year ago
yeah i was wondering if maiko really have the same hairstyle as she did. and hatsumomos geiko hair is wrong too i think
PINKluvr01 1 year ago
@PINKluvr01 Its wrong from the historical view...but for the book it is right. it was said that Hatsumomo would leave peices dangling...and would wear her hair in a sloppy manner that was unbecoming for geisha.
dagrandpoohbuh 1 year ago
Not an accurate dance...but still very beautiful. I like very much.
orangetreedance 2 years ago
i agree, it isnt very accurate but still amazing to watch
xxxkimododragonxxx 2 years ago 3
I have this on DVD!
Love their Kimonos
FluffnRipples 2 years ago 3
i love this movie!!!!!!
i like sayuri's dances, this one specifically
IXIChelseaIXI 3 years ago 3
what instrement was she playing
nirvanawd08 3 years ago
Shamisen
andr3filipe 3 years ago 3
What kind of dance is this? It's too fast for Japanese, no?
Sawrattan 3 years ago 2
@Sawrattan
Yes, I think they said in the extras on the dvd that they almost livened it up a little. (:
BooshifiedDubbing 1 year ago
Cool
Smileyface1996 3 years ago
I finally saw the movie and it took my breath away. It's a wonderful story as wonderful as the book. I view each work separately and I have no problem with either ending. Both book and movie are a rich tapestry of human emotions, love, dreams, fate...I'm ready to fall in love again after...10 years!
FlamencoChe 3 years ago 5
My ex-girlfriend played background, but I couldn't see her. At least, I couldn't distinctly recognize her. My guess is that she appeared in the scene at the bridge when the Chairman meets Sayuri for the first time. My impression of the film? It is EXQUISITE! Beautiful!
FlamencoChe 3 years ago 18
i fell in love with both he movie and book the sceneries in the movie are beutiful and the descriptions in the book are very clear.
yelissa9 3 years ago
I loved the book, but I haven't been able to see this movie because it will stab me in the heart. The reason? My ex-girlfriend is in the movie. So what? Well, she left me in order to be in this movie. The irony? Although she is Japanese, she had not heard of the book until I gave it to her as a present nine years ago in 1998. Six months later, she met Arthur Golden through me at my company's party. I still love her.
FlamencoChe 4 years ago 2
wat part ur ex play in movie?
shishie4811 4 years ago
who did your ex play?
gothicangel6664 4 years ago
Most of the actresses, at least those who played main geisha, were Chinese, ya know.
saweetpop 3 years ago
Incorrect indeed, but beautiful...just breath-taking.
Neur0ticism 4 years ago
But its still wrong. Nice movie, great plot, but very wrong o.o
kittenbut1 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How can it be wrong when a real geisha told her life events to Arthur Golden, the author and the director of the movie?
Stop trying to sound smart and pick up the books.
DuoBat66 4 years ago
Well, it is wrong. The hair styles are not right for one.maiko have explicity hair styles, these look like puffy buns. Also, her lips are fully painted which indicates her as a senior maiko but she has the dangling flowers of a first year maiko. Mineko even said herself this story is potrayed wrong. I apperciate the culture more than you seeing as you rely on a movie.
kittenbut1 4 years ago 55
thank you so much for clarifying that! You said it best! Not all understand the differences. So yes you are smart, and they need to pick up a book themselves. That was funny, and refreshing to hear someone else understand what they were seeing. I agree it was wrong. It was also wrong to use chinese characters. I am sure there are talented japanese women who could have doen these roles. Being American Indian I can understand the frustration one may have on this movie though it was good.
gemini1904 4 years ago 2
Thanks :) I apperciate and research about them. The movie was romantic but it wasn't what a geisha or maiko is supposed to be. I am hurt that sometimes people defend it as an actual reality.I agree, using the chinese characters in the movie as well was weird, and the fact it was in Japan and was spoken in english. At least in "My Geisha" Where a caucasian woman pretended to be a Japanese, they spoke Japanese in it and so did she. That was an old movie, why can't they do movies normally?
kittenbut1 4 years ago 2
I have researched about them and understand the differences between maiko and geisha, unfortunately there are many who entertain without concrete facts (for show, beauty, stardom, or whatever) deleting facts which are just as interesting. As much as peolpe "learned" from this movie, they could have been just as interested in the truth.
gemini1904 4 years ago
@kittenbut1 They did say they intended this film as an interpretation - not a documentary. They moulded things to make it look the way they wanted.
dalekzruleyeah 10 months ago
@kittenbut1 Gotta hate a know-it-all.
TheButterscotchGirl 8 months ago
@TheButterscotchGirl shut the f*ck up
kittenbut1 8 months ago
@kittenbut1 No. I won't especially not for someone who's afraid to say "FUCK!" It's not going to hurt anyone.
TheButterscotchGirl 8 months ago
@TheButterscotchGirl ok. then shut the FUCK up
kittenbut1 8 months ago
@kittenbut1 Well yea, but the woman who plays Sayuri is Chinese. And I think the movie would've been more beautiful if they'd all speak Japanese. But this is Hollywood. We don't get real culture.
padewij 6 months ago
@kittenbut1 in addition, the dance is very not-geishalike. It's too fast and gaudy, tailored for western audiences.
PikkuRiisa 5 months ago
@PikkuRiisa yes exactly
kittenbut1 5 months ago
@kittenbut1 I completely agree that the movie isn't full to the book nor is it COMPLETELY accurate to the way geisha, but the director did it on purpose to make the appearance more appealing to americans.
ExplodingCakes 5 months ago
@ExplodingCakes I agree. It is not accurate but it does appeal to American audience.
kittenbut1 5 months ago
@kittenbut1 The director said they were looking to show the geisha with a sort of Paris runway inspired change to the more traditional appearance. It's like when they did the film Hua Mulan: It is based on a poem , but in the poem there is no love story. Yet the director put a love story in as his little twist. No idea why they do it but I know what you're getting at. It annoys me too.
NobodyOfTheTardis 3 months ago
@kittenbut1 The Maikos often wore a bun that resembled a spilt peach and was very suggestive to the men. But you don't see many in the film.
NobodyOfTheTardis 3 months ago
@kittenbut1 You are definitely right about the hairstyles. But I still love the movie. As a film, its amazing and it opened up a whole new culture to me. As for the lips, I don't think hers are fully painted. Its just the white covers the portion thats not painted which makes it look like just part of the skin. So I'm not sure you're right on that but you definitely could be. But you have your facts straight and I'm happy someone did research too! =D
Anulik96 3 months ago
@kittenbut1 well what do you expect
still a pretty cool movie
oliball123 1 month ago
Mineko Iwasaki spoke with Arthur Golden, and he used some elements of what she said to him. Sayuri, though, is a completely fictional character, and what Golden used is, mostly, not personnal events from Iwasaki's life but rather background information on geiko/maiko.
Read Iwasaki's books (her autobiography is translated in english) if you want to know about her life, which is extremely different and not even in the same period as Sayuri's fictional one.
alestane 4 years ago 3
Golden wrote the book. Robin Swicord wrote the sceenplay. Rob Marshall directed the movie.
alestane 4 years ago
It's true. The Geisha elements were adapted to Western taste. I like it. But those who insist that it's the real thing are ignorant. They said it was their interpretation even in the extras of the DVD.
izzyisozaki 4 years ago
Did You read the label on the back of the book that called it a work of fiction??
pianyist 4 years ago
Hahaha agreed lkl8!^^
kilala0 4 years ago
Lovely. If I did that, the fan would go flying across the room like a frisbee!
lkl8 4 years ago