This video was making me very angry until the review and conclusions portion. Thanks for honest sharing after obvious love and time spent pursuing a theory!
@Houshalter This video comes from a design class taught with a post-modern pedagogy. The random words are a critique of the professors insistence we use a concept to design. I was trying to point out the arbitrariness of the process - looking back it is a bit of a straw-man, and I could see how it is confusing.
@Incrue Use of space could definitely be a factor (although this example is very simple and to my memory does not use it). It uses a genetic algorithm, which does not delete bad designs, only lowers their chance of continuing to exist. You do not want to throw out all bad designs because, with a few tweaks, they might become a good design.
this is no more radical (or absurd) that the modernist aproach, only with more compute potential, and we all know the modern consequences of that "tomorrow that never came" (matter acumulation, energy waste, modern ruins, overcrowding...). the computer power i think is on the capacity to understand the material world, to make more with less, zero impact, reversibility, lightness, to left some room for the people for the future. i hope this messege get to you. cheers from Chile -n.ortiz
1 - more than half of the architects and urban planners are located in the Europe and North America which count only for 15-20% of the global population;
2 - considering the growth prediction, as compared to the rate of training of new designers is it realistic that we can always have the necessary human resources to plan new cities?
For this reasons I think that having a program can design a city might be useful in the near future.
I was about to trash this video, but then I read the conclusion, and I couldn't agree more.
Stupid people would use this kind of programming just because it looks cool and does everything by itself, without even thinking about the best solution. It's like the infite monkey theory.
I also think that this kind of architecture should not be of mainstream knowledge for the very reason I just said.
Machines are meant to be used by a brain, and not the other way. Anybody else agrees?
Yea I really like his book, Machining Architecture, particularly when he talks of these methods as being the architecture of the provisional rather than optimal.
Some other references I always come back to:
Manuel De Landa, Deleuze and the Use of the Genetic Algorithm in Architecture
Neil Leach, Digital Morphogenesis (In AD 79, 1, 2009)
Wow. Awesome presentation. It went over my head, but I still thoroughly enjoyed it and intend to make sense of it in the future. Please post more of your work.
Evolutionary Algorithms mainly pioneered in shipbuilding, has immense potential in architecture if we can isolate the real neccessities required for a successful built environment.
Half the worlds energy goes towards buildings - trying to connect architecture to a system that helps make intelligent design decisions isn't without merit.
Wow, Dan your work has come a long way since I last saw you. Am trying to rework some FEM algorithms so we can use structural fitness as the selection criteria. Stop by in the 5th year studio sometime
Quite an accomplishment, however, have you considered a fitness goal upon your GA, which maximizes total interior space or possibly a predation constraint along the same lines?
You guys are really discussing this theme. It makes me so upset that today architecture is developing in this direction (computer design, iconography, strange shapes...).
dmmd123 tells us that 'architecture is art' and i totally disagree! Architecture should just stand for one thing and that's the human being and nothing else...
This is not some random shape being generated on a computer, for the sake of. (although I agree is some fairly naive and superficial applications of the computer.) In this project a genetic algorithm was used to incrementally improve on a design (one criteria for improve would be 'fit for human inhabitation'). While this example fails, there is evidence to suggest that computers will be able to augment the design process, improving the results.
Having worked extensivly with GA's I'm suprised that anyone would think to take on such an extensive project as this. What fitness function did you apply?
Look at the trends even in my short life time. Many many jobs have and ar becoming more and more automated. We live in the trasition phase between a human controlled and ran society and a completely machine controlled society. The future is an A.I. controlled world, get used to it.
The design and art always will be thousands of kilomentros of what a computer can achieve .. The architecture is so human and personal that it is impossible to arrive at a formula for magic solutions that will always be a hoax.
Imagine the crit, 'I like the form, but the detailing in this cell wall...'. There is no way. In order to design a tree you would have to be approaching the complexity of a god; a complexity necessary to become aware of the implications of your design decisions (currently we be aware of about 10 separate ideas at once). ...
... We could say that a great man could design a tree through intuition - architecture is an art. But I am uncomfortable with the odds of a guess and check method.
I propose that architecture can not be solved through a formula like a quadratic equation, deriving the single solution. I propose that architecture can be optimized (extremely crudely in this example) by the same process that generated the tree, natural selection....
.... Here the computer represents buildings through strings of data that can be 'breed' into children, and grown into buildings. The success of these solutions can be evaluated by humans, by equations and by neural networks. The design is derived through a symbiotic relationship between the understanding of the architect and the processing power of the computer.
If you think for one minute that writing a program that makes the shape you want is less creative (or less "human") than just drawing the shape, you're woefully mistaken. The trick is to find out what humans do best and what computers do best and then to combine these worlds to maximum effect. Algorithmic architecture is almost like meta-architecture, which has intimate rewards that are unknown within traditional design.
@DavidMTRutten I think meta-architecture is a huge word to use behind the word almost. From a deleuzian materialist sense meta means expressing space through psychic automatism which is very different from Algorithmic architecture which is almost repacing the subconscious with a computers logic based consious. I think that so far it is as much creative as anything in architecture but when people actually learn psychic automatism in expressing space as in jazz or art it wont touch that.
...then again, maybe the designs the program came up with had a reason, possibly cross-wind capture to create an external buffer from severe temperature changes (like in desert), even the lightwell can be explained based on high temperatures (shading the "living" areas).
From what I gather, you say that because a computer could not register a viable solution of a floor plan that yields efficiency, protection from various weather (hurricane, earthquake, etc.), as well as a good "feel" of architecture that the computer is not capable? Programs are only as good as the programmers can make them...
would appreciate if there's a voice over so we could understand much better... anyways, nice video... Blessings to you.. :)
iampeeay01 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sharing this video is really great..this is very educational.. :D
dayspeace 2 months ago
Thanks for having this video posted. Informative and amazing. Indeed, algorithmic.
insomniacgrace 2 months ago
This video was making me very angry until the review and conclusions portion. Thanks for honest sharing after obvious love and time spent pursuing a theory!
larryfredlund1969 1 year ago
The video is very confusing, but I get most of it. Whats with the random words at the beginning though?
Houshalter 1 year ago
@Houshalter This video comes from a design class taught with a post-modern pedagogy. The random words are a critique of the professors insistence we use a concept to design. I was trying to point out the arbitrariness of the process - looking back it is a bit of a straw-man, and I could see how it is confusing.
dmmd123 1 year ago
totalu usless movie :s
don't waste ur time to wach guys.
crazyoosachou 1 year ago
teach the algorithm how to identify bad use of space and delete those results when they appear
Incrue 1 year ago
@Incrue Use of space could definitely be a factor (although this example is very simple and to my memory does not use it). It uses a genetic algorithm, which does not delete bad designs, only lowers their chance of continuing to exist. You do not want to throw out all bad designs because, with a few tweaks, they might become a good design.
dmmd123 1 year ago
great
(it looks like you could do some code refactoring)
zeffii 2 years ago
@zeffii It could most definitely use a bit of refactoring (and breaking it down into classes would help too)
dmmd123 1 year ago
this is no more radical (or absurd) that the modernist aproach, only with more compute potential, and we all know the modern consequences of that "tomorrow that never came" (matter acumulation, energy waste, modern ruins, overcrowding...). the computer power i think is on the capacity to understand the material world, to make more with less, zero impact, reversibility, lightness, to left some room for the people for the future. i hope this messege get to you. cheers from Chile -n.ortiz
bloboboy 2 years ago
ok so let's take the facts:
1 - more than half of the architects and urban planners are located in the Europe and North America which count only for 15-20% of the global population;
2 - considering the growth prediction, as compared to the rate of training of new designers is it realistic that we can always have the necessary human resources to plan new cities?
For this reasons I think that having a program can design a city might be useful in the near future.
endeavourthelimits 2 years ago
I was about to trash this video, but then I read the conclusion, and I couldn't agree more.
Stupid people would use this kind of programming just because it looks cool and does everything by itself, without even thinking about the best solution. It's like the infite monkey theory.
I also think that this kind of architecture should not be of mainstream knowledge for the very reason I just said.
Machines are meant to be used by a brain, and not the other way. Anybody else agrees?
gspahr 2 years ago
have you heard of lars spuijbroek? he's a professor and leads studios related to this field.
hoteltech 2 years ago
Yea I really like his book, Machining Architecture, particularly when he talks of these methods as being the architecture of the provisional rather than optimal.
Some other references I always come back to:
Manuel De Landa, Deleuze and the Use of the Genetic Algorithm in Architecture
Neil Leach, Digital Morphogenesis (In AD 79, 1, 2009)
Kostas Terzidis, Algorithmic Architecture
John Frazer, An evolutionary Architecture
Feel free to add comment with your own favorites.
dmmd123 2 years ago
what's up with everyone using this song in their animations
WhiteyLowe 2 years ago
Great job dude! Congrats!
gugapereira00 2 years ago
that's intelligent. nice drawings at the end!
ARCHfloyd 2 years ago
nicely done!!
jami0jam 2 years ago
Great presentation, I never thought computers could perhaps be used like this in architecture. Great choice of music too.
b3nger 3 years ago
Congratulations on video .. beautifull pictures, I would very much like to know this place ... a look at my video I made of Curitiba - Brazil
just copy the address
myvA2md1Q0k
and put the link on YouTube after the sign =
Thanks ...
Curitibacity2009 2 years ago
Wow. Awesome presentation. It went over my head, but I still thoroughly enjoyed it and intend to make sense of it in the future. Please post more of your work.
rastamon1188 3 years ago
highly rated
hammerdat 3 years ago
nicely done.
louismcleod 3 years ago
Is there anyone who knows the name of the song (and album if it's no problem)?
Dreampanos 3 years ago
I know you are but what am I?
Happy Songs For Happy People
Mogwai
dmmd123 3 years ago
I don't get this but I like it.
Pikafu 3 years ago
i find amazing your patience...
I couldn't read no more than a few lines of those scripts...
imagine how many line syou have to read and write just to creat a box....
well done
joakimpaz2 3 years ago
Excellent concept! Good presentation!
SBJen52 3 years ago
Evolutionary Algorithms mainly pioneered in shipbuilding, has immense potential in architecture if we can isolate the real neccessities required for a successful built environment.
tdeff 3 years ago 5
That's astonishing....
Can anyone explain this in more detail? I don't know it as a concept?
Neophlegm 3 years ago
This project was discussed on page 50-63 of Bart Sueters thesis, which features many similar projects and ideas:
I can't post a link in the comments so find the link in the more info part of the video, near date added.
dmmd123 3 years ago
hello, i'm studying algorithmic architecture, too. Are you a student of AA in London?
i'm from China,shanghai, Tongji. I've responsed my Video of An algorithmic architecture.
popabczhang 3 years ago
Scientists use numbers and short code every day, for much more important reasons. You wouldn't think this was neat if you did too.
slippythekid2002 3 years ago
Scientists and architects want the same thing. Science should take pride that once again architects are finding delight in their discoveries.
dmmd123 3 years ago
Half the worlds energy goes towards buildings - trying to connect architecture to a system that helps make intelligent design decisions isn't without merit.
hellalpha 3 years ago
Fascinating to watch this. Cheers.
The image at about 1:00 reminds me of the surging rings of the "Vertigo" video U2 shot in Spain.
IttyBittyLit 3 years ago
Wow, Dan your work has come a long way since I last saw you. Am trying to rework some FEM algorithms so we can use structural fitness as the selection criteria. Stop by in the 5th year studio sometime
hellalpha 3 years ago
Quite an accomplishment, however, have you considered a fitness goal upon your GA, which maximizes total interior space or possibly a predation constraint along the same lines?
proadmin1 3 years ago
amazing ... architecture is beautiful in each of its forms cause through architecture numbers get shapes not the other way around
lifesart1 3 years ago
Is this a joke, or what?
You guys are really discussing this theme. It makes me so upset that today architecture is developing in this direction (computer design, iconography, strange shapes...).
dmmd123 tells us that 'architecture is art' and i totally disagree! Architecture should just stand for one thing and that's the human being and nothing else...
RoyGropius 3 years ago
I think you are missing the point.
This is not some random shape being generated on a computer, for the sake of. (although I agree is some fairly naive and superficial applications of the computer.) In this project a genetic algorithm was used to incrementally improve on a design (one criteria for improve would be 'fit for human inhabitation'). While this example fails, there is evidence to suggest that computers will be able to augment the design process, improving the results.
dmmd123 3 years ago
Having worked extensivly with GA's I'm suprised that anyone would think to take on such an extensive project as this. What fitness function did you apply?
damianpoirier 3 years ago
Look at the trends even in my short life time. Many many jobs have and ar becoming more and more automated. We live in the trasition phase between a human controlled and ran society and a completely machine controlled society. The future is an A.I. controlled world, get used to it.
codester1111 3 years ago
Architecture should just stand for one thing and that's the human being and nothing else...
says the guy who's never designed a dog house. hehe
damianpoirier 3 years ago
Well, I am sorry for the guy who has time to design a dog house.
RoyGropius 3 years ago
I love the discussion here!
I totally agree to the opinion, that algorithms and math _can_ result in great architecture. This even applies to alot more than just architecture.
The art is properly defining the problem mathematically so that you can derive the answer mathematically.
Math is just reformulated thinking. If your thoughts cannot be formulated through existing mathematical terms, define your own!
cmielack 4 years ago 2
The design and art always will be thousands of kilomentros of what a computer can achieve .. The architecture is so human and personal that it is impossible to arrive at a formula for magic solutions that will always be a hoax.
85080840905 4 years ago
I disagree.
Could a human design a tree?
Imagine the crit, 'I like the form, but the detailing in this cell wall...'. There is no way. In order to design a tree you would have to be approaching the complexity of a god; a complexity necessary to become aware of the implications of your design decisions (currently we be aware of about 10 separate ideas at once). ...
dmmd123 4 years ago
... We could say that a great man could design a tree through intuition - architecture is an art. But I am uncomfortable with the odds of a guess and check method.
I propose that architecture can not be solved through a formula like a quadratic equation, deriving the single solution. I propose that architecture can be optimized (extremely crudely in this example) by the same process that generated the tree, natural selection....
dmmd123 4 years ago
.... Here the computer represents buildings through strings of data that can be 'breed' into children, and grown into buildings. The success of these solutions can be evaluated by humans, by equations and by neural networks. The design is derived through a symbiotic relationship between the understanding of the architect and the processing power of the computer.
dmmd123 4 years ago
If you think for one minute that writing a program that makes the shape you want is less creative (or less "human") than just drawing the shape, you're woefully mistaken. The trick is to find out what humans do best and what computers do best and then to combine these worlds to maximum effect. Algorithmic architecture is almost like meta-architecture, which has intimate rewards that are unknown within traditional design.
DavidMTRutten 4 years ago 8
@DavidMTRutten I think meta-architecture is a huge word to use behind the word almost. From a deleuzian materialist sense meta means expressing space through psychic automatism which is very different from Algorithmic architecture which is almost repacing the subconscious with a computers logic based consious. I think that so far it is as much creative as anything in architecture but when people actually learn psychic automatism in expressing space as in jazz or art it wont touch that.
Shadapaga 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Crazy video, look at my sexually explicit profile, I have a link to it, in my youtube profile.
HotCaliGirl1765 4 years ago
...then again, maybe the designs the program came up with had a reason, possibly cross-wind capture to create an external buffer from severe temperature changes (like in desert), even the lightwell can be explained based on high temperatures (shading the "living" areas).
sabriath 4 years ago
From what I gather, you say that because a computer could not register a viable solution of a floor plan that yields efficiency, protection from various weather (hurricane, earthquake, etc.), as well as a good "feel" of architecture that the computer is not capable? Programs are only as good as the programmers can make them...
sabriath 4 years ago
interesting aproach to architecture. I didn't quite grasp the whole idea of what it was but I'll do my research.
jadedoel 4 years ago