Added: 10 months ago
From: kytekuttertv
Views: 153,123
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (679)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @breaneainn-After being released Leonard moved to Tibet and became a monk.(he kept the dress.) He started the school of Mind Melding.In 13 years he had 59 Branches world wide,with his 2 partners Jack La Lane, and Frankie"the Gap" from Brooklyn,NY.Frankie has three cousins,Tommy no nose,Joey blind man,and Louie mumbles.They run the Parking Lot Concessions.All went well till the ENQUIRER ran the photos of Leonard's abandoned first wife Pheeby a black,albino,dwarf and their sex Porno films.

  • Comment removed

  • The Holy Trinity, one GOD, and three divine persons, functions in an individual yet collective way:

    1Cor 12:4-6.

    The Holy Trinity (Tri-Unity) Doctrine: in its barest outline, 1Jn 5:7-8

  • Comment removed

  • @truthfulreply hey! did you read in a bible about holy trinity? if you give me a verse.. even a 1 verse... i will convert a religion what you are...

  • @ayosah2008 7. The Son is Lord----Jude 4 8. The Holy Spirit is GOD---Job 33:4, Act 5:3-4 9. The Holy Spirit is Lord---2Cor 3:17

    10. Three persons in one GOD---Gen 1:26, Mt 28:19, 2Cor 13:14

    11. Father, Son, Holy Spirit---Mt 3:16-17, Mk 1:9-11, Jn 14:26, 1Cor 12:4-6

    12. False gods will perish---Jer 10:11

  • Comment removed

  • @ayosah2008 soul.

    The Holy Trinity is Scriptural...

    How can man fully comprehend GOD's infinite make-up when he cannot fully comprehend his own finite make-up?: **Gen 1:26-27,3:22, *Gen 11:7, Deut 6:4, Isa *6:3,8,9:6-7, Psa 2:7, Mt 3:16-17,10:20,17:5,28:19, Mk 1:9-11, Lk 1:35,3:21-22, Jn 3:35-36,14:26,15:26, Act 5:3-4, *Act 17:29 (KJ) Rom 1:20, *1Cor 12:4-6, *2Cor 3:17, *2Cor 13:13, Eph 1:2, Col 2:9, Phil 2:11, 1Thes 5:23-24, Tit 2:13, **1Jn 5:7

  • Comment removed

  • Jesus partook in holy psilocybin mushrooms qt the last supper.....the bible was written by people who were eating psilocybin mushrooms.....google John Allegro and check out his work....Mush love to everyone on the planet!!! =)

  • From the comments... many people are very ignorant about their own religion. you shouldn't pontificate to people about things you don't understand....

  • @thewhite9t * And YOU should not pontificate,on things that you"think" that you understand.

  • Who uploaded this dusty forgotten corner of 1970's "after-dinner party joint" redundant drug-fucked conversation? Leonard Nimoy would puke in his wifes gold larmay handbag if he saw this. Chuck norris was only 14yo at the time, but ate his own sister in defence. Rick Astleys father was the same age and had a life threatening nosebleed in 1977 for no apparent reason.

  • @breaneainn In 1978 Rick Astleys father's nosebleed finally stopped after 538 trans fusions,only to find it was a rare African Pfuka contagious nosebleed,and Rick caught it and bleeds still today.Lenard Nimoy,who became close to Rick while giving him blood,married him.They eloped,and live in Miami.Chuck's sister turned gay,and shoved a knitting needle up his"wee-wee" in his sleep.He no longer side kicks.She froze the larmay bag,and beat him in the buttocks for 57 minutes,then had a heart attack

  • @billy1212ist I heard that when Chuck found out about his cousin Ricks gay union, he roundhoused the continent of Africa and created Madagascar. Rick and Leonard adopted Peewee Herman, but were forced by court order to stop selling his blood on the Nigerian black market after his role as Gollum in the Lord of the Rings attracted the attention of P.E.T.A. suicide bombers. Amy Winehouse never liked her brother Chuck, EVERYBODY knows that.

    10 points for fuckedupness billy!

  • @breaneainn*Amy stopped her coke habit,then was addicted to chug-a-lugging,a qt.of semen twice a day,said it made her peppy.After finding Peewee,was wearing no make-up as Gollum,he was kidnaped.Taken to the Caribian Island of Reeko,where a secret lab worked on germ warfare,using his pee,Known as Agent PWE.He is kept heavily sedated,pumped with blood,and liquids,unconscious in a small dark room.Leonard was caught with 9 cased of blood,he was made to wear a pink dress and sing"Mame" for 2 years.

  • @billy1212ist ..Leonard..Nimoy...in..a..pink­..dress. You win. Transvestite Spock, fckn nightmare stuff. lol.

  • when MYSTERY is reinforced,that only means that KNOWLEDGE has been lost.the scripture say ..."my people PERISH for lack of knowledge".christianity is a mystery based religion.there is very little actual truth and many contradictions at it very core.you CANNOT be a thinker and a lover of truth and be a christian.it's impossible.

  • @WORLDWIDE187HUT Any list of the giants of physical science would include Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Boyle, Pascal, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, all of whom, despite denominational and doctrinal differences among them, and opposition that some experienced from church authorities, were deeply committed to Jesus Christ.

    Looks like these guys achieved ''the impossible' 'U need a history lesson mate!

  • when MYSTERY is reinforced,that only means that KNOWLEDGE has been lost.the scripture say ..."my people PERISH for lack of knowledge".christianity is a mystery based religion.there is very little actual truth and many contradictions at it very core.you CANNOT be a thinker and a lover of truth and be a christian.it's impossible.

  • Evidence is mounting that there is still a huge amount of water stored deep in the earth in crystal lattices of minerals, which is possible because of the immense pressure. See L. Bergeron, “Deep waters,” New Scientist, 1997,:“You have oceans and oceans of water stored in the transition zone. This is a secular source not a Christian one I think that enough posts for now. Thanks

  • In their catastrophic plate tectonics model for the flood, Dr Austin and his team. have proposed that at the onset of the flood, the ocean floor rapidly lifted up to 6,500 feet (2,000 meters) due to an increase in temperature as horizontal movement of the tectonic plates accelerated.3 This would spill the seawater onto the land and cause massive flooding

  • So it is quite plausible that these fountains of the great deep involved a series of volcanic eruptions with prodigious amounts of water bursting up through the ground. It is interesting that up to 70 percent or more of what comes out of volcanoes today is water, often in the form of steam.

  • Genesis 7:11 says that on the day the flood began, there was a “breaking up” of the fountains, which implies a release of the water, possibly through large fissures in the ground or in the sea floor. The waters that had been held back burst forth with catastrophic consequencesThere are many volcanic rocks interspersed between the fossil layers in the rock record—layers that were obviously deposited during Noah’s flood.

    .

  • The fountains of the great deep as mentioned in Genesis are probably oceanic and subterranean sources of water. If the fountains of the great deep were the major source of the waters, then they must have been a huge source of water. Some have suggested that when God made the dry land appear from under the waters on the third day of creation, some of the water that covered the earth became trapped underneath and within the dry land.

  • @TheTruthnetwork2 i have to say Genesis is one of the biggest reasons i stopped being believer. If there was water enough to cover the earth completely (using the peak of Mt Everest as a reference, let's stick to the Bible interpretation) thats over 8km or 5 miles depth of water in EVERY direction on earths surface. You could melt every last iceberg and dehydrate every crystal on/in earth but the mass of water there is just not here. If there was that much it would be around for millenia

  • @timothymochley In their catastrophic plate tectonics model for the flood, Austin et al. have proposed that at the onset of the flood, the ocean floor rapidly lifted up to 6,500 feet (2,000 meters) due to an increase in temperature as horizontal movement of the tectonic plates accelerated. This would spill the seawater onto the land and cause massive flooding—perhaps what is aptly described as the breaking up of the “fountains of the great deep.”

  • @MegaFloyd100 hi, i'm not familiar with Austin or the proof of his/her arguments but then that would only be a tsunami, after all Everest is 8000m above sea level so to cover that.. there is also the problem of localized species..why are marsupials only found in Australia and New Zealand?(thousands of species of animals btw) if they were on the ark surely we'd have some kangaroo/koala/tassie devil fossils in america, middle east etc. No girraffes in Europe? Mammoths in Africa? Just a thought

  • @timothymochley yeah theres 101 questions i guess.i'll just refer you to the answersingenisis website.For every argument there seems to be an equal counter argument.

  • Hi Timothy thanks for your reply. First of all as I stated these texts even if they are older all depict a catastrophic flood in fact every civilisation's ancient records from China to India have the same account so are you questioning these texts as genuine? Second on your valid point abouth their not being enough water I will put my thoughts on the next post.

  • @TheTruthnetwork2 thanks! i really do appreciate someone who can pose an argument without resorting to insults and u do seem to have a keen interest in this. I'm an agnostic but was born into a very Christian family so i can appreciate ur faith. However, there is still the small matter of the animals and plants being wiped out, all coral would die too of course, and i do know from my college Chemistry that most crystals contain water as part of their structure so thats no big deal to me.

  • @timothymochley Hi Timothy thanks for your comments unfortunately other people are geting involved in our conversation and trading insults so maybe we should continue this debate privately. Its a shame people cannot debate without abusing one another and I include many Christians in that I am sorry to say. Your background is the opposite to mine I was brought up in a home that didnt believe in God and I myself was hostile to the Bible and Christianity

  • @TheTruthnetwork2 *When you say,"and I",you don't need the "myself",no need to say it twice.

  • Comment removed

  • @TheTruthnetwork2 hi that's a great point but to be fair every nation and people on earth have experienced a flood at some point in their history.. lets be honest. To the guys who wrote the Bible, the middle east plus Egypt was the entire known world to them! Thats why no one mentions anything that goes on outside that region in the Bible.. sure they mention Ethiopia and Sudan once or twice but those were words used for the entire stretch of Africa beyond Egypt, used by the medieval translators

  • no that is the usual new age propaganda tell a lie often enough and people believe it. have you studied the Bible and the Sumerian and Babylonian texts? I have spent my whole life studying all of them they only confirm the Bible to be true that the world was destroyed by a flood and that the religion of the Sumerians and Babylonians was the worship of fallen angelic beings and their offspring.

  • @TheTruthnetwork2 fail...the suemrian texts are older and more detailed...besides, there is no possible way a worldwide flood ever happened. There isn't enough water. Then theres all the marine life that die as a result of fresh and sea water mixing, all the plant life dies as well because nothing survives submerged for 40 days.plus the time it took the water to recede. The dimensions of the ark make it SMALLER than the titanic and yet 2 of every animal could fit PLUS all the food to feed em?

  • @timothymochley

    God's ways are misterious :-)

  • @MsKhaisa - That's all you got, god's ways are mysterious? If god's ways are so mysterious, then how can you ever hope to understand any of it? How can you say for certain what happened, in history, in regards to a world wide flood when there is NO evidence for it? So god created a world wide flood to wipe out his creation, left no evidence for it, nor do oceans up to the tops of tall the worlds mountains make any sense, but you're happy to just say, god is mysterious?

  • @UPplRSick

    Just believe and stop your research to find out what happened EXACTLY million of years ago . I was here to watch the documentary not to debate the Bible . I don't have studies on this field .. So yes I am just happy to know that GOD exists and yes HIS WAYS are sometimes misterious , why ? SO ppl like you question about it and not just believing . You need FACTS wich pro'bly you're gonna get them when you will meet God . Pro'bly . Have a nice Sunday !

  • @MsKhaisa - OH that's cute, what a fun way of saying 'Oh, I don't have the capacity to understand events that have happened, are happening, or will happen because I just know that god is there without really needing to prove it. i just have a a feeling that god is real and it sucks for everyone who doesn't have this feeling, I don't need facts or evidence, I am firmly convinced my computer works because of god's magic that i know is real because it is mysterious.'

  • @UPplRSick

    excuse me but you are so full of s__t . And I am not even gonna respond to you anymore just to piss you off :))

  • @MsKhaisa not really plausible... we have advanced as a civilasation because we question things and work out why they are the way they are..u just cant say it's a mystery and walk around believing whatever you like..thats why Atheists see themselves as smarter than religious people..because they keep questioning even after the religious people have stopped using their minds to understand things! An old chinese saying goes "the wisest man behaves like a fool, for he asks the most questions"

  • @timothymochley its God...dude....its a mystery...

  • @JEREX101 i'm sure that's what people said to Newton as he tried to work out the math behind celestial orbits.. basically ur arguent is "we're not smart enough to figure it out" but we won't know without questioning things.. after all if all we had to go on was the Bible we'd still believe the Earth was flat and their is a "firmament" holding it up

  • why do most christians still eat meat and most of the time also A LOT of meat! the bible speaks of peace and also says ;thou shalt not kill' and even in the first lines God says vegetarian products should be our food. i have asked many christians, but none of them has ever given me a good answer.

  • @Kapojos That's because most christians don't truly understand what the bible truly is. Where the philosophy and science behind the bible truly originated. They don't do their own research. We they speak to you, they are repeating something someone told them. I know the verse you speak of and I'm a fruitarian because I found that not only was the verse biblically true but scientifically also. Fruit and vegies are what we were designed to eat. Not meat...

  • @Kapojos ...Also when their isn't much fruit or plant life due to natural disasters such as floods or earthquakes. Meats is acceptable for survival until fruits and vegies are plentiful again. Don't get me wrong. I'm not judging anyone. Most people do what they do because of a lack of knowledge. I can't fault them for that. And we live in a society that pushes meats over everything else. So I can't fault them for that either.But if you come into knowledge and continue in error the result in on u

  • @knossis1 allright thanks for your reply. i agree with everything that you have explained! tell me something more please about the food you eat. what exactly do you eat? i dont know so much about a fruitarian diet. and many people i met who were vegan, they did not look so healthy... very thin and weak and pale. i would like to know what your experience is!

  • I question the validity of everything I've read about the bible. Hundreds of years of translations and these works were bound to me misinterpreted form its orignal meaning. I've studied it and there are some many confusing and puzzling allegories that it's hard to find any meaning at all. I'm going to stick to my own interpretation and say that what Moses and the other early bible fugures actually experienced were alien encounters who were mistaken as "Gods". This makes the most sense to me.

  • @pucksterz12 - if you really want to understand the bible you need to go farther back to the egyptians and sumerians and babylonians and know where the stories really came from. most of what is in the bible is taken and reformed from those sources.

  • After the new testament was written it was clear that the church was going to be the successor of the kingdom of Israel and like them they choose their own kings as well named them Popes and when they were corrupted as their israelites predecessors god divide them as well in the "north"" all protestant tribes and in the "south" the catholic church. At the end of the 1700's the pope was arrested by the forces of Napoleon Bonaparte similar to what budaconozor did to the king of Judea. Not until t

  • I want to point out these. In the old testament Israel was the chosen people and they ask for kings. The prophet Samuel was comision by god to elect one. After King Saul failed to god, David was named the king and all their descendent were his successors. But they all failed in their conduct or behavior to the lord. First the kingdom of David was divided, in the north 11 tribes were pack together and in the south the jews were left alone ruling Jerusalem as their capital. At the end the kingdo

  • Christians use terms like:Heaven and HELL.

    And instead it should be:Heaven and earth

    Christians speak thing like:Good and EVIL

    And instead it should be:Good and bad.

    Christians talk of things like:God and the DEVIL.

    And instead it should be:GOD and GOD ONLY.

    So.Christians will not-cannot let go off the very same thing that occupies their mind most:

    Their father Satan.

  • @TOLTECAAZTECA You say: "Christians speak thing like:Good and EVIL.

    And instead it should be:Good and bad." Says who? Evil is the Opposite of Good when discussing Theology.

  • @Cherubaby THANK YOU FOR PROVING MY POINT VERY NICELY.

  • @TOLTECAAZTECA What about the default position? The position that awaits proof of God, Satan, Allah, Vishnu, Zeus, Odin, Ra, et cetera?

  • @iMagUdspEllr The difference between your diety list is of course that Christianity is based in history.Even a cursory comparison of religions will show the shallow nature of your argument.

  • @MegaFloyd100 An earnest research of Christianity will show that Christianity is not based in history, it is not enough for a religion to be "based in history" (as opposed to actually being history), and that there are no contemporary records of Jesus in the entire historical record. Please note, that for these reasons many historians do not think Jesus ever existed. Of the historians that do think Jesus could have existed, they think that Jesus was merely a Rabbi. Present evidence

  • STOP WRITING IN CAPITALS. IT`S MORONIC

  • what a bunch of idiotic brainwashed cultists...you folks scare the hell right out of me...lol

  • Watch "After Jesus the first Christians" CNN documentary-Or your local library has multiple encyclopedias-with all the historical details of the church.Besides whatever wrongs were committed in the past-the church still holds a sound & truthful doctrine in its traditions & terachings-NEVER CHANGING-unlike most of the Protestant Churches which hasve caved in to todays modern society[EG-abortions,embrionic stem cell research,women deacons,priest, & bishops]

  • More twisted truths about the Roman Catholioc Church AGAIN-- go to your church peacefully and worship & stop attacking the RC Church. We certainly don't put down other churches-in fact they are the last things on our mind. We have the most sacred acts of worship on the globe.Perhaps you should take a course in Catholicism-there is so much more to this faith than you realize & it holds the fullness of truth.

    Watch Saints & Sinners -on you tube[History channel]

  • Christians used terms like: Heaven and HELL.

    Instead it should be: Heaven and EARTH.

    Christians used words like: Good and EVIL.

    Instead it should be: Good and BAD.

    Christians talk words like God and the DEVIL.

    Instead it should be: GOD and GOD ALONE.

    Christians will not-cannot let go off the very same thing that occupies their mind,soul,spirit and body: Their father Satan.

  • HISTORY OF THE BIBLE-ISN"T THAT THE TITLE OF THIS VIDEO?

    I ONLY HEAR THE USUAL ANTICATHOLIC TWISTED LIES. I HAVE DONE MUCH READING,WATCHING DOCUMENTARIES,RESEARCHED THE EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH. WHY IS IT THAT YOU SHOULD CREATE FALACIES, MISCONCEPTIONS,& MISGUIDE OTHERS ? ARE YOU THAT ENVIOUS OF THE RC CHURCHE'S HISTORICAL ROOTS,THAT NO OTHER CHRISTIAN CHURCH CAN CLAM?

  • @truthfulreply Such non sense. The RCC was very controlling of what was approved to be read. If RCC had its way, no one but the priest and the other Catholic higher ups would be able to have a bible. The RCC church, just like any other large church is very good at killing people and destroying the teaching of Jesus.

  • The Pre-Christian Jews, Post-Christian Jews,Catholics & Eastern Orthodox held the doctrine of Purgatory-no one denying it,until the Protestant Reformation 460 years ago-thus only ptotestants deny it today.

    I found this apologetic on a reputable website

    If the Church sold indulgences, it would be a terrible thing. But it does not sell them. That is an old Protestant claim . The Church has the power from Christ to remit the temporal punishement due for man's sins.

  • IT WAS CONSTANTINE THE GREAT ROMAN EMPEROR WHO LEGALIZED CHRISTIANITY [read Edict of Milan and who gave his personal wealth -RECIEVED IN DOWRY FROM HIS FIRST WIFE-to the building of our first & Roman Catholic Basilica-called ST JOHN LATERAN-its in the encyclopedias-to check this out

  • @truthfulreply you mean Constantine the pagan emporor of Rome in 325 ade that convined the first council of Nicaea that wote and compiled the first several versions of what became the bible...this was 1st edit of many that twisted the words of myths & fables to control the inevitable split which was going on in Rome...the church saw this and liked the idea of conning everyone with fear & control it gave them by threat of eternal damnation. its always been man made & a control tool

  • @harleybud73 Read -The Edict Of MIlan-he legalized Christianity after his victory @ the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. He was Pagan before this-converted to Christianity. Read his biography & how he helped build the 1st Basilica with the dowry of his !st wife-St. Johns Lateran in Rome. Read the letters of the Early Church Fathers-[Eg;Irenaus of Lyon, Polycarp of Smyrna,Clement of Rome,& others,in There are 10 volumes wriiten prior to & during Constantines ruling & 28 volumes afterwards.

  • @truthfulreply READ THE DIDACHE-teachings of the 12 Apostles to the Gentiles.

    The term Catholic [Universal-in Greek] was first referred to by Ignatious of Antioch one of the early Bishops[Early Church Fathers]

    The RCC Didn't make up these things, they all originated in the early church.

  • THE RC CHURCH COMPILED SACRED SCRIPTURES IN 382AD-DECREE OF DAMASUS[POPE]. IT PROTECTED THIS BOOK AGAINST HERESIES WHICH EMERGED FROM THE EARLY CHURCH & DIMINISHED QUICKLY-you forgot to put that in your documentary.

  • You failed to tell us about the FIRST 300 YEARS OF POPES WHO WERE MATYRED ALONG WITH THEIR FOLLOWERS-THEY WENT TO THEIR DEATHS IN THE CIRCUS OF NERO IN THE ROMAN COLLOSEUM!

  • @truthfulreply there were NO popes until after 325 ade. Constantine wrote and compiled the works of many and created the divinity and rose Jesus to divinity which he never had before...he was justa  man...maybe a good man, maybe a conman but always and forever a man

  • @harleybud73 The early church knew who Jesus was - the Son of God, did you not read what Paul and Peter wrote? The early church fathers put the documents together and then a church counsel put the books together. Jesus teachings and words make it quite clear that Jesus called himself the Son of the living God.  See John 1-21.

  • @MRGV7373 There was NO early church...Constantine created the church and wrote what you think some others wrote. There was many myths and fables about some man named Jesus but NO scholar of his time ever mentioned him in any writings..the works you refer to were fabrications by Constantine & a con job YOU obviously fell for. Idiots need some crutch to lean on & you found yours...but don't go telling the same lies told to you like they are true...its deceitful & should be criminal.

  • @harleybud73 the definition of Church is the people who believe in Jesus as lord and savior. In the first 200 years, churches were local to cities or small geographic location. They exited in many cities of the Roman Empire. The Official Catholic Church is what you are talking about by Constantine. many local churches kept on after Roman made the Catholic church the official "state" church. From 30-170 AD, 4 historian mentioned Jesus by name and cite Jesus life. see other YU

  • @MRGV7373 LOOK UP- IGNATIOUS OF ANTIOCH-READ WHAT HE CALLED THE EARLY CHURCH IN 107AD. READ THE "DIDACHE" HINT-EARLY CHURCH TRADITIONS WERE SET. READ THE DECREE OF DAMASUS"-HINT-BIBLE CANONIZED 382AD.

    WHAT TOOK PLACE @ THE COUNCIL OF ROME?

    WHAT WAS THE EDICT OF MILAN?--HINT-CONSTANTINE ORIGINATED THIS.FOR ANY AND ALL DETAILS LOOK THESE UP YOURSELF-TO CONFIRM THIS-YOU WON'T BELIEVE ME-AND FOR THOSE SO OPPOSED TO THE TRUTH-YOU'LL SEE IT IN BLACK & WHITE & STILL DENY IT.

  • @truthfulreply LOOK UP ST JOHN OF LATERAN-IN ROME-AND HISTORY OF THIS-CONSTANTINE WAS INVOLVED.

    LOOK UP ST CALLISTUS-FIND OUT WHAT LIES HERE

    LOOK UP MARTIN LUTHER OF 15th CENTURY-FIND OUT WHAT THIS MENTALLY CHALLENGED MAN DID TO CAUSE THE REVOLT

    WHAT HAPPENED IN 1054AD? CLUE-GREAT SCHISM

  • @truthfulreply These reading just show how early it was that some church "fathers" had gone from knowing and following what Jesus wanted. Other churches - body of believers- were active and did not follow the edit of Milan. the RCC is western in thought and control. the eastern and Chinese church, Indian and African churches lived on. Roman based churches were not the only churches. Many other Churches in northern Europe lived on and followed Biblical teaching and not Rome.

  • @MRGV7373 Rome was in fact the center of Christianity. We were on our 5th Pope when the last apostle-John died. That should tell you something about the primacy of Peter & his successors. Read Ignatius of Antioch-he was a very Early Church Father who used the term "Catholic" in 110 AD. All the Ecumenical Councils were meetings of All the heads -Bishops of the church all over Europe,Africa,& Middle East.They were all ONE church.

  • @truthfulreply The early church was spread over many countries and many cities. Rome was one of many but Rome was the most important city from a political and power stand point. The early church was one body of believers. Not Pope existed yet and the church was following what the apostles taught. Once the Roman Bishop with the roman empire made Christianity the "religion" of the Roman empire, false teaching came in and one of those was the pope and RCC as the only church.

  • @truthfulreply the Roman church left the Catholic of the east when the RCC decided that the Pope is the only head of the church which is never taught but Jesus or any of the Apostles even Peter never taught this. Peter never over rules any of Jesus' teaching since Peter knew that Jesus was the cornerstone of all Christian teachings and churches. The RCC persistent teaching of "one true church" and Papacy has caused all these splits with other churches. Sad but true.

  • @MRGV7373 I have you to thank along with many others for your verbal attacks on the RC Church-It compelled me to find the truths about my faith. My findings-through extensive reading in its heritage & historical evidence,guided & confirmed to me,where the one true church is.I found more than I bargained for-I was relieved,joyous & @ peace & love in Christ @ last. I am now what i should have been many years ago-A most devout & more knowledgeable Roman Catholic.I no longer have a void in my faith

  • @truthfulreply I think my written comments as thoughtful and thought provoking. If you take them as an attach, you might want to question why you feel that way.  Even Augustine did not believe that Peter was the rock but Peter confession of Jesus was the "rock" of the church. Peter and Paul both confirm this. You should read an article by Wiillam Webster , A response to Fran Beckwith's Return to Rome. If you read this and you will think differently.

  • @truthfulreply The true void in you faith is that your gospel has been added onto by the RCC. The assumption of Mary, Papal infallibility, and many other teaching don't follow early church teachings and have perverted the Gospel by adding onto what Jesus, Paul and Peter taught. The RCC has added onto the Gospel and now teaches many "doctrines" that are not based on the word of God, or early tradition and therefor violate the principle of making another Gospel.

  • @MRGV7373 READ MATTHEW 16:18-19. Was Peter not the Prince of the Apostles.Were we not on our 5TH POPE when the last apostle John died?

    You need to brush up on your history.

    Due to your bashing the Catholic Church-it compelled ne to find the truths OUTSIDE my church ON MY OWN. I found the TRURE HISTORICITY in my local library in the university encyclopedias along with accurate documentaries. Have you read through ANY of the HUNDREDS of EARLY CHURCH FATHERS LETTERS or THJE DIDACHE??

  • @truthfulreply All my findings-THROUGH MY OWN RESEARCH-DUE TO YOUR ATTACKS & OTHERS ON MY CHURCH have made me what I should have been many years ago-I am now a most informed & devoted Catholic. These findings have helped me to grow closer to Christ through the authenticity my church.It has given me the love ,joy,& peace in Christ through THE ONE HOLY CATHOLIC & APOSTALIC CHURCH. A BIT IRONIC-All the bashing going on has made Catholics ever more devout. Your strategies are backfiring!! Thank you!

  • @truthfulreply Keep up the attacks as more & more Catholics will dig for the truth & find that our Catholic faith truly leads us to Christ. If you read The Didache-you will find that our Sacred Traditionds weren't made up years later-they originated from the 12 Apostles. If you read the letter from Ignatius of Antioch to the Smyrneans chapter 8-you will find where the name"Catholic Church" was derived from in 110AD--we didn't come up with this years later.

  • @truthfulreply Show me one, even one writing in the first 500 years that states Peter was infallible as Pope? show me one letter that Mary was assumed in Heaven? Show me one teaching as Peter was Head of the Church in Rome in the first 300 years?? They don't exist. If they did I would be most happy to follow them. Show me any place in NT that infant/babies were baptized? Children and adults were baptized but no babied. Babies can't believe. So that is false teaching of RCC.

  • @truthfulreply Peter was the first to say that Jesus is messiah and when a person says that Jesus is Messiah and Lord, and are baptized, they are a member of the true church of God, Roman 10:9. I have read enough early church letter to know that the early church fathers never taught that Peter was infallible or Mary assumed into heaven or that Rome was the "only" church. What about the church in Jerusalem? They had all the Apostles teachings? So think a bit hear.

  • @MRGV7373 READ THE DIDACHE-you will find our Sacred Tradiotions in it Find yourself a Catholic bible as we were the ones that compiled it in 382AD under Pope Damasus---OUR DOCTRINAL BOOKS- BELONG IN IT-PROVEN THROUGH THE PARALLEL VERSES IN THE NT. Doesn't the OT foretell the NT-Doesn't The NT fulfill the OT-this will prove that we didn't add these books years later. It proves that your HERO MARTIN LUTHER removed our 7 books along with poarts of others.

  • @MRGV7373 Read the Columbia University,World Encyclpedia,Oxford University Press Encyclopedia & others to find how the OLD LATIN BIBLE used in pieces throughout the Rly Church was all translated by St Jerome -a latin Scholar under Pope Damasus--into OUR RC Latin Vulgate. This was THE ONLY BIBLE used for 1150+ years after its compilation in 382AD-OUR RCC CAME BEFORE THE BIBLE

  • @MRGV7373 Why on earth would The Catholic Church go against her own book?

    Papal infallibilty-LOOK IT UP-it DOES NOT STATE THE POPE IS PERFECT.

    Haven't you read The Didache??? Haven't you read ANY of the letters of the Early Church Fathers or know who they are or what Church they were head over??

  • @truthfulreply Lastly, read outside of the what the RCC teaches and you will find the rest of the truth. The RCC teaches it is the one true church. The real facts turn out quite differently Why? Rome caused the east /west split by making Rome and the Pope the only lasting authority which violates that Jesus is the cornerstone. Rome by its teachings have left true christian faith that Peter and Paul taught and have added on teachings that are not in scriptural or in the tradition

  • @MRGV7373 Oh yes --The Great Schism of 1054AD! Rome did not cause it--They broke away from us-no longer wanting to have the Pope for their head AFTER 1024 years It is more of a governmental split than a Theological--& I hope that someday the two churches will unite.

  • @truthfulreply Anymore questions-go to an AUTHENTIC Catholic website & direct your questions to an Apologetic expert.

    All your verbal criticisms, with ALL the other Anti-Catholics have urged me to find answers outside my church-I looked with an open mind and the truth of its long heritage can be found in black & white in any reliable source. I have become a stronger Catholic because of it-as I confirmed these things on my own. Your attacks are in vain-as we Catholics will become more devout.

  • @truthfulreply Dear Truthful We don't attach YOU we are calling you to look at the full picture of what was said and done after Jesus died. Peter does have the full saving message of faith. But what many object to is that Peter message has been added onto the RCC. The RCC has 90% of the truth and it needs to go back to what Peter taught in ACTs 2. RCC needs to stop teaching non essential teaching as dogma when the teaching is not true or suspect. That is all that I am saying.

  • @truthfulreply con't why teach Mary as ever virgin when there is no conclusive proof or proof that she did have children. So is Joseph ever virgin also? Pope as infallible when a church counsel changes the teaching of a prior pope and defines the prior pope's teaching as misguided? 3 popes at one time and which one is infallible? These kind of FACTS cause one to mistrust the RCC. The additional RCC teaching go beyond what Peter and Paul taught and make a "new Gospel".

  • @MRGV7373 The 7 councils in the Early church [gathering of ALL bishops]were Council of Nicea 325AD,Council of Constantinople 381AD,Council of Ephesus 431AD,Council of Chalcedon 451AD,Council of Constantinople II 553AD,Council of constantinople III 680AD,Council of Nicea II 787AD after that there was a Great Schism in 1054AD-when East & West churches divided-the Eastern Orthodox as it is now named formed & broke away from the church of Rome-no longer wanting to have the Pope as their head.

  • @harleybud73 -Quite the Contrary-the first 300+years of Popes were martyred-go to Rome & visit St Callistus-grottos of the early Popes-the inscriptions on their tombs should tell it all-deny that!

  • @truthfulreply But then again-there will ALWAYS be those who will deny the truth even after being slapped in the face with all the historical evidence-JUST LIKE @ THE BEGINNIING.

  • God made man.

    God has authority over men.

    And man has dominion over the female type.

    But of course the typical Christian and its so call human rights its screwing everything up.

    [Specially those dykes...EXCUSE ME i meant to say WOMEN. Women who preach the word of God on any stage]

  • @TOLTECAAZTECA totally backwards...man made gawd and man controls other men with that con job...

  • Athiest are fools who just believe they were given life by there mother..so ridiculous...can a man give life..omg...God giveth life from the time u are in ur mothers womb...God giveth u life..

  • @5staritalian the catholic religion is a worthless one.......u're not the holy religion u kno.....there are soo much worthless info about that church...SHAME ON YOU

  • @JEREX101 Read Matthew 16:18-19, 1 Timothy 3:15. 2000 years of roots-take a trip to the Roman catacombs & visit the grottos of the Popes-1st 3 CENTURIES & more.

    Pick up an enclopedia-ALL CHRISTIANITY BELIEVE IT OR NOT ARE OFFSHOOTS FROM CATHOLICISM-AND CATHOLICISM IS A CONTINUATION OF JUDAISM

    Catholics are wising up now more than ever-to defend our faith through our knowledge of the historical proof ,evangelizing globally & through education. Its 2000 year old faith should speak for itself.

  • @truthfulreply sorry dude but...not being ignorant to you religion or any religion but...i dont think that the catholic religion is righteous because...well history will tell you that they had 1000 yrs of dark ages be a catholic or die..and also there was some people who stood up for the true faith and 68 million martyrs was slaughtered for that..now i kno there are some good ppl in your religion but i dont think it's a good religion..history is my proof

    Books:Foxes book of martyrs

  • @JEREX101 How about going to your local university library -reseach history of the early Christians-Archeology,Catacomb­s, Early Church Fathers 38 volumes of their letters-that ought to keep you busy reading and your mouth shut!

  • @truthfulreply huh......trying to cover up ur Nasty Religion....THE letters by Martin Luther..and Foxe are real...so i dont care what u wanna say ur religion is not true....i DONT believe in ur Religion ok...too much evidence to stop me from believing....

  • @truthfulreply well all here daughters....read Revelations...it talks about the woman and the beast...she was dressed in scarlet colored robe..and drank the blood of the saints..and she had blasphemous names...when you here about blaspheming..it's the irreverence to the holy spirit..now these names are the woman's daughters and these daughters are whom you talks about..the religions that broke away from the catholic church.

  • @JEREX101 REVELATIONS? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? WHAT A MIGHTY PROUDFUL STATEMENT-YOU THINK YOU CAN INTERPRET THIS HIGHLY SYMBOLIC BOOK? I'LL LEAVE IT TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE TEACHING CHURCH-THE ONE TRUE CHURCH THAT COMPILED IT-----382AD-----DECREE OF DAMASUS!!

  • @truthfulreply it has been revealed today by a prophet..

  • @truthfulreply continuing: The woman in the bible is refered to as the Roman Catholic Church

    and the daughters are the religions u have today, i am from no religion..I follow the Spoken word of the 20th century prophet William Marrion Branham we are of no religion we believe we have the true faith..one time The prophet William Branham was cutting his lawn and he was talking to himself he said..The holy Roman Catholic,Pentecostals etc.and something said to him"Dint say that,it is blasphemous

  • @truthfulreply so that should link to back to revelations when it said blasphemous names, and these are the daughters...so not disrespecting thy religion but thy religion is not righteous, the pope is not Holy, all the popes are not holy, the Catholics are worshiping him as God therefore braking the commandment"Thou shalt not have no other gods before me" and committing Idolatry..so i don't really respect your religion, dont take it as an insult buut its just what we believe my friend

  • @JEREX101 WE DO NOT WORSHIP ANYONE AS OUR GOD-EXCEPT CHRIST HIMSELF-THROUGH EVERY MASS. READ THE DOCTRINE OF THR RC CHURCH-ITS BEEN AROUND FOR ALMOST 2000 YEARS AND PEOPLE STILL CAN'T GET IT RIGHT. WHERE ON EARTH DO YOU GET THAT NOTION? YOU ARE OUTSIDE OF THE FAITH WITH TOTAL MISREPRESENTATION-IT SHOWS THROUGH YOUR STATEMENTS.

  • @truthfulreply u are outside of the fait my brother,.....and another thing u baptise in the name of father son and holy spirit..now what on earth...father is not a name, son is not a name..and holy ghost is not a name..now Jesus said do everything in his name in word or deed, those are titles...come on... baptize in the name of Jesus Christ..not in father son and holy spirit..thats nonsence...name of Jesus Christ..

  • @truthfulreply u dont understand...READ between the LINEs........so who is the father....Not Jesus Christ?...and who is the son....Jesus Christ?,,,,and who is the holy Spirit ?....JESUS CHRIST.....it says in THE NAME..........so whats the name JESUS CHRIST......

  • @JEREX10 There is not a single text in 2000 years, including the new Catechism of the Catholic Church, where the Catholic Church, her popes, her bishops, her official teachings, her saints, or her acknowledged ecclesiastical authors, deny the Word-made-flesh or the Blessed Trinity. Instead, all of Christianity owes the preservation of these Truths to the Catholic Church, whose great Councils formulated them and whose saints and popes have defended them to this day, often at the cost of martyrdom

  • @truthfulreply what blessed trinity...that is nonsense.....nothing such as blessed trinity....at the cost of martyrdom.....mmmmm martyred six million people?....who opposed the wickedness of your church during the dark ages?.....questionable.......

  • @JEREX101 The Blessed Trinity--DEFINITION

    The Trinity is the term employed to signify the central doctrine of the Christian religion — the truth that in the unity of the Godhead there are Three Persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, these Three Persons being truly distinct one from another

    This is part of our Catholic faith-most Christians believe this.END OF CONVERSATION.

  • @truthfulreply end of convo...becuz u dont understand what am trying to tell you

  • @truthfulreply God is A Spirit not 3

  • @JEREX101 Catholics & Christians believe as God in 3 persons-blessed trinity-as the hymn goes. Your opinion is not fact-its what you believe-WE believe different than you-You don't believe the Wodrd made flesh thru Christ;s incarnation.-Thats yout right.Mine is in the blessed Trinity-thats my right-FREEDOM OF RELIGION!.

    END OF CONVERSATION.-Our beliefs are different-Catholics & Christians profess the blessed Trinity.

  • @truthfulreply * I don't believe either one of them.But your 3 persons aspect is all wrong.The 3 are ONE GOD in different forms.Like Water,which is a liquid,ICE which is a solid,and steam,which is a vapor.Different forms of the same thing.Yet ONE.These Man made religions are so shallow,as befits mans brain at this point in time.So for some they work or "Hold Water".

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @truthfulreply 3 titles but one spirit...not 3 PERSONS

  • @truthfulreply conversation dismissed.......we are two very different people..any way thanks for the discussion....we learned about each others religions....thanks for the talk

  • @JEREX101 The Blessed Trinity-thats what the Catholic Church has professed for nearly 2000 Years!! The father,the son,& the holy spirit.are one.

  • @truthfulreply well simply say the Name of Jesus Christ...it sounds like three spirits when u say trinity..One spirit

  • @JEREX101 Question--The Holy Trinity is not in the bible-seeing as you are Sola Scriptura why do you believe this? Its not written anywhere in scripture?

    Ill tell you how-Its the Catholic Church that has professed this!

  • @truthfulreply How do you know the books in the bible are inspired-Thers no list or index?? Who decided this? Not your church!

  • @truthfulreply the bible is written in a tied up way....The name....it says the name.....so whats the name Jesus Christ......Acts 2:38 says.."Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the Holy Ghost"....now what that is saying?....huh?....the Name of Jesus Christ.....so The name of the father son and holy ghost is the Name of Jesus Christ.......

  • @truthfulreply there is nothing such as holy trinity...there is only one God...ONE SPIRIT...NOT 3..one

  • @JEREX101 *Water,can be 1) Liquid,..2) Ice,solid..3) Steam,a vapor/gas.See they are all ONE in different forms.This is what is meant by Trinity.This is logic,I don't believe in Religions,man made.I believe that I am made of atoms,along with the rest of the universe which is made up of atoms,so on that level we are ONE,in the Infinity of the eternal void.

  • @JEREX101 *God is ONE,correct.Just as "Water" is One.But the ONE WATER,can be ICE,STEAM,LIQUID right?So to your god can do the same,take 3 different forms,see?This is just logic,I do not believe in any of these man made religions.They pump it into you from birth,and you believe it because your to young to argue,or you trust them,and every else believes so you FOLLOW.Then you pass it on.this is their game to rule.The Vatican made $92 BILLION DOLLARS,last year 2011 alone.You get any?me neither.

  • @JEREX101 It sounds like you cant speak straight ;-D

  • @JEREX101 You are right! We are soooo different. This Early Church Father is so RIGHT!

    "Christian is my name, and Catholic my surname. The one designates me, while the other makes me specific. Thus am I attested and set apart... When we are called Catholics it is by this appellation that our people are kept apart from any heretical name."

    Saint Pacian of Barcelona, Letter to Sympronian, 375 A.D..

  • 49 dumb athiests disliked this

  • @JEREX101 I think atheists are the smart ones here, they don't believe blindly in some kind of fairytale but they open their eyes and search for the real truth. More people should do that and I think I will join them, if God is real I think he's the most sadistic asshole in this universe and I want nothing to do with him.

  • @Sm0k4bl3 u will give an account for these same words which thou hast spoken on judgement day

  • @Sm0k4bl3 noo the athiest are the dumbasses

  • @Sm0k4bl3 do u kno hell is real....i will link you to the audio onn hell right here on youtube......its a group of scientist was doing a project in Africa and some how they came across hell...a black bat flew out of the hole and wrote in the skies saying"i have prevailed" now those scientist was so scared they almost went insane......they had to make them forget about it or they would not have been of any use to themselves if hell is real Heaven is.......and dont be the dumb athiest ok believe

  • @JEREX101 Typical christian, 'join us or burn in hell'. Same bullshit logic every religious person uses for some reason. I'm not scared for death, so no I'm not going to join because of that. It just shows how ignorant and stupid your religionis. blackmailing people 'join or die, join or die' lol just fuck off with your bullshit.

  • @Sm0k4bl3 ok thank you.......

  • @JEREX101 Bla, bla, bla. It's kinda sad to see how blindfolded you fools are from reality. For science we have lots of proof, what is your proof? Please don't even use the word 'bible' cuz that's everything but proof. Im not going to swing harry potter books in your face trying to prove my point. Because a book simply doesn't make sence.

  • @Sm0k4bl3 we are not blindfolded...and WHAT proof do you have that the world is gonna end on December 25th 2012....GIVE ME THE PROOF.......Science is a lie.....we believe by Faith...you believe by what you hear and see...That's why there is a world Called FAITH.....get it now put that in your pipe and smoke it........So the Wkipedia books dont make sence? you said a book dont make sence ...how about...the history books with prized info...they don't make sence?.....the bibile is the best book