How It All Ends: Menu

[pupatron3000]

@Sk8tefreee that is the most HELPFUL sentence in the history of mankind...

[rockoutntopout]

i think a topic remains unaddressed. the money required to solve or reduce the impact of global warming can be better spent solving world hunger, poverty, diesease. which would do the most good? stopping even the worst temperature increase like al gore claims or keeping 250 000 dying hungry people alive daily?

[mrchacko]

Ahhh lecture based teacher :P

[MarrsRock]

I believe though regardless of our effect on global temperatures, the fact is, the entire global warming debate is distracting us from realising that the real cause of all the problems lies in our dis-functioning debt based global financial system. As long as we circum to its inbuilt mechanism of inflation and perpetual growth we will never have a chance at real sustainability, regardless what our actions are.

[god123Isreal]

i conquer with asilverose, also you have inspired me as well, bravo!

[jeromesch]

Sorry, just thought of something else: the grid relies on extremes, and not by the evidence (as some other posters have pointed out). This means that even if we choose the actionable scenario, we don't have conclusive evidence to react to, so the "Yes" column becomes void, right? Also, this means that any theory with faulty/argued evidence should be acted on anyway, despite opposition. I think the grid is more applicable to conclusive scenarios.

[jeromesch]

I think there is a flaw in the argument, and it is as follows: you can take an infinite amount of scenarios and come to the same conclusion, meaning that all issues facing anyone at any time requires action. And what if you apply your logic to other controversial issues such as religion/the Apocolypse/Armageddon. Using the grid, your logic says that we must take action and encourage everyone to follow a religion, because if we don't, we'll let too many people go to hell. Am I wrong?

[MrMDESTINY]

Your logic is propaganda and has many holes. First your assuming there is a problem for this to work, the very reason for a yes and no answer. Second Global warming has too many variables to consider action. What would be your action be if global warming was suddenly caused by a devastating particle burst from the Sun? Or suddenly 15 volcanoes decided to erupt within one week? But no your assumption is that it was created by man for man to repair.

[Rancorboi]

we dont have power over those natural disasters. but we do have power over how much emissions we spew into our atmosphere, which directly effects the melting of the polar ice caps, the death of reefs across the globe, etc...its the little things that individual people have power over

[alexkvaskov]

nice wording - "volcanoes decided to erupt"

read what Rancorboi posted

[raddeejay]

chapaoe, that is why wonderingmind42 made these videos - as a way for people to get past the debates and take action - one way or the other. If you are in the 'B' column, you can stop watching his videos. You are done.

[chapaoe]

I see it this way, this whole GCC talk is just another diversion of attention portraited by the 'powers that be'. Americans should be worried about getting control of currency, that would solve any problems that an eventual GCC might bring. The way it looks now, this whole story is just a hoax to bring about more taxation and less individual freedom... look at the money system implemented by the fed act(1913) and the bretton woods treaty, there ull find what u should really be worried about.

[PharmGateway]

I have created a simple, but useful page, which has all the links to this series of videos listed in the correct order.

The site name is of the standard format with the usual (US) extension after the dot. The site name is then followed by a forward slash and the name of the page, so the first word is my site name and the second bit is the page name (but you need to put D O T h t m on the end).

pharmgateway howitallends

[Anna100l]

Sorry, I'm genuinely interested in your videos but you talk so FAST here (for a non-native speaker) I have to stop every 2 secons lol

Or are you only addressing Americans?

[uraniumgrenade]

Oh God... Why must all these videos be nine/ten minutes in length. (Not a genuine complaint- I'm just up very late, and tired.)

[d3f3ct3d]

You Brainwashed people :D

[cmalchik]

Suggestion: It would be helpful if you just had this whole list posted on a web page so when people come back to this they don't have to deal with the way YouTube doesn't give you complete freedom in choosing where to skip to in a video. Also, scrolling is easier than clicking and dragging a circle.

[uraniumgrenade]

cmalchik makes a very good point.

[axelxaldan]

he said you could take these videos and do what you will with them. you could do it yourself :)

[peterbourgon]

Innovation is the answer. changing energy sources is a scam. Hybrids are a scam, until the technology can pay for itself.

To all the enironmenalist: tell me about solar heating with windows and shudder and skylights.

cheap and affordable

Check out this graph:

live search this:

Is Global Warming on the Wane?

How Solar Goes Polar

found on farmers almanac page.

mean temp. increase over last centry:

about 1 deg F

[debobrien1]

tell that to the permafrost in alaska that is melting and causing the roads to buckle and houses to crack and sink holes to open in the landscape. and polar bears and penguins whose habitat is rapidly shrinking, making the season to get fat to survive shorter and shorter

[peterbourgon]

Polar Bears and Penguins eat seafood not plant matter. there are POF in the oceans.

Livesearch this geothermal. drill a hole in the ground and get the heat for free instead of burning coal. got to be cheaper.

like I said, average temperature for the centry. the average tempperature yearly can fluctuate 10deg if memory serves me right since the gragh is no longer available. so yes thes things will happen if engineers calculated for the strength of the permafrost instead of ground.

[HotChargerGirl5346]

i love these videos. you seem really dedicated to researching what is going on and what could happen. i just wish that the people who criticize all the work gone into this would see what a good argument you are making. i have thought about this before but never saw what it really was. these videos have widened my view of the topic and i look forward to watching the others

[asilverose]

It's unfortunate that most of the people who respond to your videos are illiterate or contentious. I think for myself and your argument is solid. Even if simplified, your argument sends a point quickly and efficiently, which is essential to delivering a message. It's clear you feel passionately about this and you inspire others to take action. Please know your efforts were worthwhile, and these videos have changed my opinion and inspires me to act.

[wonderingmind42]

Thanks. I've got a book coming out in a month and a half, based on the videos. If you're willing to help generate some Internet buzz about it, then subscribe, and in a few weeks I'll post a video with a call for help, and specific suggestions.

[Willyboy933]

@asilverose I agree.

[knie123]

thanks 4 the work bro really good work

[boobmcnutt]

Looks thorough.

That's my favorite kind of argument.

[SplendidImaginings]

Thank you for all your effort. Good play.

[aikpanchi]

Thank you so much for doing all this work!

[cellphonepussy]

the more i watch the angrier i get at how seemingly passive the masses are about this situation were facing this guys an inspiration

[NoWayMan323]

I agree -_- Seriously, people, you got 2 choices...

WE DIE

or...

WE GO THROUGH A DEPRESSION

If we die, we can't come back to life.

And depressions dont last that long, compared to death.

[znijuroku]

You invested way too much time for anyone to ignore it

Im game

[Starstreamtracker]

The last fifty years we've been told...Ice age, don't drink the water, wear a gas mask, stay out of the sun and work at night.

[iamrandyjames]

Hey buddy, you are the man version of "Jan Brady". I don't know if anyone else agrees but, there it is; I said it...Jan, you are annoying. Please don't get any more ideas for youtube videos, just write a book. Thanks Jan.

[YuriRockzz12]

now we are again being told..... ice age will repeat, the world will go berserk, and we are responsible for it. if you dont believe what he is saying dont bother commenting.

[N495illithian]

You are amazing, I'm going to watch each and every one of these videos.

Also the fact that you read that entire thing out (and typed it) makes this whole series even more impressive.

[astrologyrox]

Amazing - I plan to watch all videos!

[Neuromancer4242]

Unless, of course, there is no invisible dude in the sky...

[Neuromancer4242]

btw caucasian2008, whatever you're smoking, I want some of that...

[Neuromancer4242]

What I like about these videos is that the author seems respectful and makes a genuine effort at being objective.

My objection is this: the grid-logic is flawed because the 'worst case scenario' can be used for any purpose, such as limiting civil rights and invading countries to defend us from terrorists. Think '1% doctrine'. As we've seen, this line of logic works very well.

If this has been addressed before, please let me know.

I am convinced of GGC. But not by this logic, by evidence.

[maurolarahuerta]

I dont think that the grid can be used on things that only involve humans. I think that only works when involve things that go beyond our power.

[Neuromancer4242]

Actually it is being used on human things. People invade countries 'just in case' they have WMDs. Civil rights are being restricted 'just in case' there are terrorists around, in the same way as precautions are being taken 'just in case' GGC is real. The 'just in case' logic will justify anything, everything. That's why it must not be used - look to actual evidence for GCC, WMDs, whatever you are considering, not to eventualities. Actual proof matters.

[maurolarahuerta]

I mean.. yes, it CAN be used... but the grid its a logical solution that brigns good things ONLY when there is 1 axe that you cant control on any absolute possible way (like climate disaster). Things like terrorism and wars have many ways to deal with (diplomacy, education, forums, international courts, etc). If someone use this grid to solve "human-to-human" things, will lead only to paranoic reactions.

[Neuromancer4242]

sorry, but - No.

the grid is NOT the logical solution to non-man made threats.

EXAMPLE: someone tries to sell you asteroid insurance, to insure your house in case it's hit by a meteorite (this is certainly beyond human control). According to the grid 'just-in-case' logic you should take it. YET if you look at the actual probabilities of a meteorite hitting your house, taking out insurance makes no sense. Hence, actually looking at evidence to figure out probabilities is important.

[maurolarahuerta]

You cant say that you think that the grid its a weak theory only cause it can be used with other purposes. Thats like say that you dont use a knife for anything cause you can kill someone with it.

There are certain rules that a problem should have to use it in a effective way, like: the problem should have evidence presented from both sides, the possible solutions should be things that reduce the damage caused by the problem, etc.

[Neuromancer4242]

Nonsense.

A knife FUNCTIONS for its PURPOSE (cutting). This is so irrespective of whether you cut bread or people.

The grid logic does NOT FUNCTION for its PURPOSE (argumentative logic), because the conclusion simply does not follow from the reasoning, as I have shown. This is so whether you use it to prove GCC, Marxism or asteroid insurance.

Again, a conclusion can only be made on EVIDENCE, not on 'just-in-case" reasoning. Wonderingmind said as much and that is why these videos are here.

[maurolarahuerta]

Ok you find this grid theory weak, but at the same time, you rely on "evidence". Let me tell you that evidence can, and its always, manipulated, so also it isnt an effective way.

[Neuromancer4242]

100% agree.

'Evidence' (like all information) is in the eye of the beholder. Interpretation is everything, and everyone, the media, the governments, companies, pressure groups, etc try to put their tweak on it.

Which is why people must find out for themselves. Read the books, articles, watch the videos, do the research, see what convinces you. Make up YOUR mind. Don't follow dogma, people or a grid.

Evidence, like democracy, is not perfect, but there's nothing better, nothing more effective.

[yogeniusz]

Adressed in the very first, main video, "How it all ends". And so, the comment is moot. The grid is not "just-in-case" logic, and risk management is not about acting regardless of consequence. So it would probably help if you watched the videos before complaining about a point that is specifically addressed.

[Neuromancer4242]

Pardon me?

This was addressed precisely towards the very original how-it-all-ends video. The grid *is* just-in-case logic - wonderingmind said as much himself. The only reason I posted this here is because the board on the original video is blocked.

[yogeniusz]

My bad then, I'm not sure if it's the original video or another, but he does deal with a "Giant Mutant Space Hamsters" scenario. Also there is a linked video dealing with graduated responses, results of actions, etc. And in addition there's a linked video on the risk management process, which is not only a scientific process but the way businesses around the world deal with most situations involving a difficult choice.

[yogeniusz]

(stupid character limit)

Anyway, from the index for this set you can also find a more detailed grid, taking into account skepticism about whether or not GCC is happening and whether or not our actions can have any effect on it. The grid itself is a useful tool. While a simple (2x2) grid may not be the best way to deal with the problem in actuality, it's probably the best way to present it to the average viewer.

[heros817]

global warming started 20,000 years ago.

[The831st]

How the hell do you expect me to quantify it? I'm just CONJECTURING. I"M JUST SAYING.

Yes, the UN and total authority is bad. Yes, they have too much control already and shouldn't be granted any more than necessary.

My stance is that maybe it is necessary. Maybe, based on the evidence and on the (some might say "very") roughly agreed-upon science community's opinions, now is not the time to be attempting to overhaul the world's political infrastructure? Also, how would I quantify such things?

[Stevensonrob]

That was my point--how do we know that the UN and like political entities, through their efforts to do the "right thing", will make anything better? We don't.

Regarding overhauling the world's political infrastructure, I hardly think that is necessary. However, I also do not think it is necessary to lay our future in the hands of major political institutions, like UN and ilk. Though I am willing to hear out that perspective if you wish to move beyond "just saying".

[The831st]

We don't really "know" anything. We don't "know" if anything will do anything. To say that we shouldn't trust something because we don't "know" it will work is the same as saying that we shouldn't do anything at all, as we don't "know" if any thing will work.

If the UN doesn't do something, who will? Market interests? Local authorities? How do you intend to have the third world up and organize themselves into a world-stabilizing force?

If there is already organization, why not apply it?

[Stevensonrob]

Let me reword that--do we have any idea that "action" by the UN and like political entities will result in a net positive impact? The answer, sadly, remains the same: We do not.

Your second paragraph seems odd to me--I did not realize the goal was to turn the third world into a "world-stabilizing force". As far as I can tell, both bobo6245 and this video series speak about action towards alleviating the consequences of climate change, and I hope you are not confusing the two.

[The831st]

How would it result in net negative impact or zero-sum impact? Explain that to me. I don't understand how positive action, like what is recommended by the much discussed AAAS and NAAS, could lead to anything but positive results, even nominal ones.

Obviously, I'm not confusing the two. If you're confused, that is merely your poor interpretation of my point.

What would you propose, though? Is nay saying all that you would contribute? And please, let go of your Perfect Solution fallacy.

[Stevensonrob]

"And please, let go of your Perfect Solution fallacy."

I don't understand how the need for a quality solution can be confused with the want for a "perfect solution".

"Obviously, I'm not confusing the two. If you're confused, that is merely your poor interpretation of my point."

Please then, explain what you meant in a less ambiguous way.

[Stevensonrob]

And really, it is hard to understand what you wish to have happen with vague references to ideas and the ability to fall back on things like "i'm just saying" or "this is just conjecture". Your stance is that "maybe it is necessary", but what? What "action" "may be necessary"?

[The831st]

The "action" I would like to see is minimal. I'd like to see the UN and national governments around the world coming to terms with, and accepting, the idea that GCC is perhaps the most urgent issue that we face, in almost every sense: environmental, ethical, economic, and even in regards to national security. Specific, literal, "action" is something that I would leave to professional minds to assess and determine, as I am not qualified to recommend "action" in regards to a global catastrophe.

[Stevensonrob]

"The "action" I would like to see is minimal."

"I'd like to see the UN and national governments around the world coming to terms with, and accepting, the idea that GCC is perhaps the most urgent issue that we face, in almost every sense: environmental, ethical, economic, and even in regards to national security. "

These two statements seem contradictory. But really, because you offer no specifics, then we really have nothing to debate.

[Stevensonrob]

Minimal action may be necessary--I'll agree with that. Heck, major action may be necessary, but until I see what exactly "action" means, I'll have to remain skeptical. So far, things like the kyoto agreement and the LW bill here in the U.S. have come far short of a quality solution.

[sesoma0]

my head hurts :s

[kewlguy323]

I do agree on the things you say, but I have to ask you two questions:

Do you believe in evolution, or intelligent design? And, do you believe in the LORD?

[dancingnature]

i dont know what wonderingmind will say but ...

well i accept evolution (im a biologist)what does that have to do with GCC?

intelligent design is a sophisticated way to say that our human ignorance defines God ..so, NO

i believe in God, and again, what does that have to do with GCC?

[kewlguy323]

None of those things have anything to do with GCC. Just wondering what his opinion on it was.

[BluVenus14]

This is sad. Most of those criticizing comments are completely besides the point. "The upper right corner has the best scenario, so lets just do that." That example was purely chance! It was if we took no action, and the idea of global warming just happened to be false. If that happened, we'll obviously be happy, since we went on with our normal lives, and nothing happened. But if something does happen? Then we're stuck with economic disaster, because we didn't do anything about the crisis.

[7xHistoryx7]

This deserves more attention. Way. More. Attention.

[leoinanaheim]

Very nice

If anyone makes any stupid comments don't hesitate to kick their faces until they take it back.

I can't believe you spent so much time on this.. did u get any money for this?

ur a high school teacher aren't you?

I believe GW is much like God..

It's better to go to believe He exists because if He does in fact exist, you're much more likely to go to heaven... if God doesn't exist, then u took a chance and there's little or no consequences to the decision.

in other words.. YOU ROCK!

[jjjjjjoooooonnnnnn94]

Then what are you? If you don't even bother to just think about this for at least a second, then you are worse than a nerd.

If being a nerd means you actually consider global warming in our future, then I am proud to be one!!!

[kewlguy323]

Me too.

[bobo6245]

We are not discussing the effects on the planet, because the planet will be just fine. We are discussing the effects on our way of life. If we want to help our way of life, don't make rash statements and give irrational actions as a response. Attack the problems we know is happening, and people will live happier and free.

[bobo6245]

provide information on surveys and studies of climatologists and peer-reviewed literature that do not provide a consensus.

No, in the end the lack of scientific knowledge is a big drawback. We should be attacking a problem that we know exists--poverty. If AGW is not real, we will have still done a great thing for man and the planet, and if AGW is not real, we will have lessened it's impact greatly. I know you have covered this stuff in other videos, but innovation will carry us through.

[iiopen]

Your comments show an astonishing lack of understanding about - or is it confidence in - scientific ethics, peer review and the IPCC reporting process. It would help to keep in mind that there is little influence of political opinion or ego. Statements are weighed by evidence and proper analysis. Not on a reflection of the ramifications of the conclusion. Any political or ego driven pile of papers would be crushed under the weight of more sound science.

[iiopen]

*I can also provide information on surveys and studies of climatologists and peer-reviewed literature that do not provide a consensus*

Please do.

[bobo6245]

The IPCC is not a scientific organization. It was made for the soul pupose of creating policy, by a political organization--the UN. It would be naive to think that such a group would not have been influenced by politics. AND, the IPCC's peer review process leaves much to be desired, as it not as rigorous as even a scientific journal.

[iiopen]

Over population - that is population in excess of the environmental carrying capacity - is the proplem. Over-consumtive western lifestyles exacerbate the problem. Climate change, poverty, resource delpetion - and the like - are merely symptoms of the problem.

[bobo6245]

So, what do you propose we do? Population control? Action in response to climate change will have no affect on over population. And it comes down to you, iiopen, believing that we have passed some sort of line in population in which the earth can no longer sustain us. The same thing was said 200 years ago, and then 100, and then 50, and so on. Can we carry on like this? No, but people like you offer no realistic solutions.

[bobo6245]

So, what do you propose we do? Population control? Any action in response to AGW will have no affect on over population. What you are saying, iiopen, is that we have passed the line for which the earth can sustain us. The same thing was said 200 years ago, and 100, and 50, and so on. Can we go on like this? No, but you offer no realistic or related solutions.

[iiopen]

I would not presume to tell anyone what to do with their own life. One needs to learn and decide - all on their own - what action is appropriate given their own circumstance. My point was merely that - although noble - your call to action on poverty only treats a symptom not the cause.

[bobo6245]

So should the government, and the UN, force us into something that we may or may not agree with? I do things to lessen my own impact, like I am sure you do, not because someone forces me to, but because I think it is the right thing to do. And I believe that taking action on the scale that AGW proponents suggest won't be in our best interest.

[The831st]

Most people in our world don't have the economic freedom or education to pursue the balanced, global equilibrium-oriented, lifestyle that you, as you believe it is right to do, do. It is an unreasonable expectation to place upon the shoulders of the billions of disenfranchised peoples that exist within the world. The governments of the world's states and the UN and similar bodies already say what people should do. Why not make them tell us to do the right thing, now, and overthrow them later?

[The831st]

Response to bobo6245. Missed it.

[Stevensonrob]

"Why not make them tell us to do the right thing, now, and overthrow them later?"

Did you think about this statement before you wrote this?

[The831st]

I did. It's a bit irresponsible to disregard the powerful influence of such bodies of political force. Whether or not you agree with their existence, or clout, is a moot point: they are ALREADY in control, so why not? I agree that they are flawed and totalitarian entities, but there is no denying that the UN and other organizations do, really, have power over such things, especially in underdeveloped areas. To say they shouldn't do anything, because you disagree with their existence, is bizarre.

[Stevensonrob]

"To say they shouldn't do anything, because you disagree with their existence, is bizarre."

I don't believe that this was anywhere within my post. Though, speaking of bizarre, lets look through the comment that I quoted originally:

"Why not make them tell us to do the right thing, now, and overthrow them later?"

Why not *make* them *tell* us to do *right* thing now, then overthrow them *later*? That doesn't sound at all odd to you? We are making them tell us what to do?

[The831st]

Hey you're right. I was speaking in rhetorical superlatives. Pardon me.

We can do all we want in our own Western lifestyles to help out.

But what about the places that don't have the Western privilege of lifestyle choice? I'm sure you would agree that other governments and the UN and such DO exert influence on poorer, less developed, regions, right? Well if we can reach critical mass of cultural optimism and constructive thinking in Western states, "maybe" it will rub off on those other ones.

[The831st]

Also, your post didn't really express anything other than "you used buzzwords and I don't appreciate vague language," so obviously I wasn't attacking your solid, unstated, theoretical argument, or your post. So. Go ahead and pick a groundless fight.

[The831st]

We already allow them overarching power. What we should do is admit this, admit it might be used as a tool of unfathomable good, just this once, and then continue on. Are you more concerned with undemocratic sources of authority or with global catastrophe? I mean, what is your main point? How else would any considerable action be taken?

[Stevensonrob]

How "good" will this be anyway? Can you quantify it? Negatives verse positives?

Anyhow, if we are going to have a debate, I think it best that we state our stance on the issue: What do you propose such government entities do? I am not exactly sure which comment you originally responded to--bobo6245's post, which doesn't seem to be a recent comment.

[Stevensonrob]

To continue to allow "totalitarian entities" (as you put it) to have and utilize such massive power and control, even if they sometimes use it for the "right thing" (again, as you put it), seems like a bizarre ideal to me, at least.

[The831st]

It certainly is not my personal ideal, and I don't know why you would assume that. This is a purely situational conjecture.

I just recognize the fact that they, more than anything else, in underdeveloped regions in particular (i.e. not you or I), can help encourage positive action on the issue.

They already hopelessly dominate the third world.

They may just as easily decree a contrary mandate saying it's a hoax and that we should carry on as is, and they'd still have just as much authority.

[Stevensonrob]

Cont.

Forgetting that as a mistype, I'll reword it:

"Why not let them tell us what to do now, then overthrow them later?"

By allowing them such overarching power, well...you give them overarching power. And when an entity such as the UN becomes more powerful, it becomes far more difficult to "overthrow" them.

[bobo6245]

Sorry, I posted on "How it all ends" but I could not finish my thought with two comments. So I will finish it on here.

The NAS and AAAS gave those statements only in response to the "consensus" of the IPCC reports. There was no specific science produced by members, and no polling of members that would lead them to this conclusion, it was only in response to the IPCC report. I can provide details on why the IPCC's process is flawed if you would like. I can also provide

cont.

[killingfeverGOD]

wierd

[QueenStinger]

u even spelled it wrong.

[fountainhead19]

Regardless of the outcome of the argument YES vs. NO climate change, there is no argument that pollution kills living creatures, including humans. The war against global worming shall be in fact viewed as the war against pollution. Then there is no question we must win it to survive.

[Shindai]

Never seen an oil spin? seen fish die in polluted rivers and stuff?

[dusparr]

You misinterpreted what he meant.

He meant that there is no question that it does kill animals.

He just happened to write his sentence in such a way that it could be misconstrued as "the is no proof that pollution kills."

[sadskippy]

Please use this same mentality on ATHIESTS,,, I'm sure your mentality will convince them as well.

[TempestStormwind]

You're implying it's just "Pascal's Wager".

Which it isn't.

The Wager fails due to unfalsifiable assumptions with no evidence to back them up, and has a mathematical glitch due to its infinite payouts.

This argument has assumptions based on evidence (see Risk Management) and finite, measurable payouts (see The Manpollo Project).

[Xiller8]

??????? what are you trying to say?

[TempestStormwind]

Xiller, he's invoking Pascal's Wager. Wiki it; it's a flawed philosophical argument to the effect of "If god exists and you believe, there's infinite happiness, which you don't get if you disbelieve, and if god doesn't exist it doesn't matter, therefore believe."

It falls apart due to assumptions being made without evidence (indeed, he starts by saying we can't understand God, but based the argument on predicting God) and infinite payouts -- flaws that HIAE does not have. (See Risk Management.)

[lolalolalola88]

i wish u were my science teacher gosh mine thinks im crazy for every word i say like i say jappanese culture is interesting he just goes off on me about chinese or if i ask question about things like this

[yulia76]

you should make a DVD about this XD.

[TempestStormwind]

A DVD is being made, but not by him. He's taking a (well-deserved, IMHO) break from the pizza-and-red-bull-fueled climate research and filming to focus on his family and his teaching.

The DVD is being made by people he's motivated to take action.

Details on it will be made available when it's finished, which hopefully won't be very long.

[jjjjjjoooooonnnnnn94]

If he ever does make a DVD (or when the DVD that TemptestStormwind talks about comes out) I will be the first to buy it!

[poisonedlamb]

your message is really getting through to others. I found out about your videos through my yahoo homepage. there was a 2 min news segment on the most terrifying video you've ever seen, so i looked it up on youtube and found all your other videos. thank you so much for trying so hard to get this message across to others. fighting against ignorance is an uphill battle. but in the end its worth it. keep on trying and i will do my best to spread the word.

[balkanalia]

Rock and teach on...your students (and Oregon) are lucky to have you. Hope you got some sleep... especially before you go to blow more things up. (Including your opponents objections). Good planets are hard to find.

[Pikajane]

WOW I am watching all of your videos, I've already seen some of them, and I wish you were my Physics teacher :D

Wow how can you say all of that without passing out?

Awesome vids though, and you really make a lot of sense. I'll spread the word ^_^

[wilsonjd9]

Wow. Incredible work. Well done. It is making a difference. The Toronto Star up here in Toronto had an article about your video. If you are looking for good solutions see my stuff by searching for Solar Village.

[duffster17]

I've seen stuff about you in the newspaper. You really are getting through to people.

[TempestStormwind]

Which newspaper, if you don't mind me asking out of curiosity?

[duffster17]

Sorry, I don't remember. I wasn't at home when I read it.

[henriatheist]

And you have done all of this research and video making in ONLY 4 months??? Man, you are productive! My utter respect!

[wonderingmind42]

Yeah, it was hell and I'll never do anything like it again. But it's my contribution to humanity (and my little girls).

Spread the word! Spread the word!

[pizzaguylol]

I usually don't watch these kinds of videos (global warming info videos), but for some reason I'm watching these all the way through. You display it well and seem to really know what you're talking about. I'm not saying I'm going to be a champion of this, but I truly hope we don't end up in column B man. Thanks for making these.

[dbd1963]

Whatever happens, you did your part.

[Bimo165]

I cant wait to be a father then..i see how your daughters are a big motivation to you.

Ameen brother, let's spread the word to the WORLD!!!

[rockmanatv]

Kudos for an impressive, thorough, and comprehensive video series. An amazing amount of information, I for one appreciate.

Thank you!

[goot776]

Send me a message through youtube and we can get in touch by email.

[goot776]

The website should be very simple if your goal is to make this viral. I can host a beta website for free, if you want to make a page right away, rawrcore. I don't think my buddy's server would be able to handle a ton of people - we'd have to find another host for the site to go public.

[rawrcore]

You definitely need a website. And I'd gladly help you run it if needed free of charge. Just want to get your voice out there.

wonderingmind42(dot)com is available.

Only a few bucks to register the URL and hosting wouldn't be that much, and if or when this takes off I'm sure we could get together some help and get everything squared away.

Feel free to contact me through messages on here.

[billyzelsnack]

Can you just put this as text somewhere? Video is really a poor format for something like this.

[wonderingmind42]

I totally agree, but am not too Net-savvy. Any suggestions about how I can do so? Please contact me directly at wonderingmind42, as my "rounds" are big, and I may not find you response for quite a while. Thanks for the thinking!

[ecochic87]

This is a great format for somthing like this! Different people learn in different ways! THere is already SOOOOOO much text based info on this topic its refreshing to have a visual sorce as well.

[MandreasW]

This is just a menu of what you can expect for 2-3 hours of his videos.

-

Great stuff I'd say! :D

[MandreasW]

This is just a menu of what you can expect for 2-3 hours of his videos.

-

Great stuff I'd say! :D