Added: 4 years ago
From: CPUSATUBE
Views: 900
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you can't claim to be Marxist-Leninist and then claim to be against violent overthrow.

    CPUSA = 90 years of party history to date which is nothing more than 318 members worldwide and an entrenched revisionist leadership.

  • to socialism yes. communism no. by the way communism is actually a load of crap. great theory that fails 100% of the time.

  • @alivsfrazier12 Look at Lenin's reign of Russia , that didnt fail they already had a mixed Government and was starting to go towards the idea of marxism

  • theres no need 4 violence when people are exposed 2 socialism they would willingly turn 2 the red side promethues i.e. socilism brought the light 2 man he did not mean 2 burn them only 2 illuminate

  • You know damn well that Marx thought that the proletarian revolution could only come about thru violent means since the bourgeoisie would stop any attempt at abolishing private property thru violent means [via the state]. While Marx wanted the new, post-revolution society to be as peaceful and nonviolent as possible, he never expected or wrote that the proletarian revolution itself would be peaceful or nonviolent. Communism requires the violent overthrow of capitalism.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more