Can I just say this is a fantastic video demonstrating the use of CUDA technology. I use it to show to all developers of our software that might benefit from it.
Would you have to re-code a program to utilize CUDA like they did with FASTRA? Like Lets say I want to use a GPU, say a GTX295, to compile a really complex map for a newer game like Crysis or HL2, something that takes hours even on multi-core computers. Basically I want to know if you could get current windows apps to use a GPU like that? Let's say Sandbox2?
It used to mean that just years ago, but with CUDA,GPGPU and all sorts of new stuff, graphic cards are now largely used for more general use as well. Not sure how largely that is used... Maybe some hardcore gaming gear producer could use GPU in the meaning of "Gaming p u" ;)
My question would be, how hard would it be to implement traditional load balancing/message passing so you could make a cluster of these systems, all using GPU power?
I know its insane and probably wont be made but wouldnt it be great to do almost like a complete PC sli setup... connecting motherboard to motherboard for twice the shared performance
I have one 9800gx2 and i experience slight micro stutter, users with quad sli with that card experience a bit more stutter... what would four 9800gx2's be like. You would need a very nice chipset to allow those cards to work in synergy.
Squidge, are you not listening? I will make it easy for you, Quote..."it has four graphics cards, each containing two GPU`s, so this is eight GPU`s working in total...Each GPU has 128 processors...for a total of more than a thousand small processors working together. Can you understand that? Get your facts together before embarrassing yourself again in front of all these smart people in here.
The most you can do is Quad SLI, meaning only 2 of those dual cards could be used for games. But for other tasks like folding@home all GPUs can be used.
wow you guys are awesome specially for 4000 euros compared too buying a # NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 or the newer versions that cost around 2000$ each making it around 8000$ just the cards them selfs and rather using 4 9800 gx2 now only costing around 200$ u found a way to make it work by using xp 64bit for the 8 gigs of ram and xp for actually sporting the 8 gpu's on those 4cards genius for that i give you 5 stars and a standing ovation lol for the guy playing crysis lol u guys couldn't help it
My answer is not wrong. It would run crysis just the same as a single 9800 GX2 would. Which isnt too bad of a card on its own.
THE FOUR CARDS ARE NOT IN SLI! Look. It could not be any more painfully clear that there is no SLI bridge in there. Therefore these cards will NOT all function together to render graphics on a single output.
So to whoever gave my comment a thumbs down, I suggest you read up on how nvidia's cuda software works.
You can, the video shows him running a game. But as I said to another guy, it would only function as though there is one GPU for games because they are not connected in SLI.
This is nonsense. The project was started right after the 9800GX2 cards became available in Europe. What you are forgetting here, is that such a project takes time, and the movie was recorded after it was done. Besides, the NVIDIA CUDA platform was used, which does not run on ATI cards.
ATI has a platform called Stream Computing for writing general-purpose GPU code. One one hand, choosing a particular platform results in vendor-lock-in, but on the other hand it allows for specific optimizations compared to more general (openGL-based) programs.
That's basically the concept of programmable hardware, such as FPGA's. The major advantage of using gaming hardware (which was not designed for general computations) is that it's backed up by a huge user base, resulting in low costs.
"let's call him Bob" lol doesn't the guy have a real name? and omg, this guy looks so effin' smart. he's stereotypically what a super nerd should look and sound like.
Lol this isnt gaming PC... All graphics cards are just made to calculate and not to play games. I'ts a nice thing to know how that gaming crap can actualy be used for somthing usefull.
Yes. But you have to write dedicated software that parallels the algorithms. The gain by using gamecards is solely due to some algorithms are suited for parallelization. Video compression is one such. If the algorithm is heavily dependant on previous calculations then you will run slower on a graphics card than on the CPU.
Some Matlab and Mathematika libraries already use parallelized algorithms that speed up the computation time by a hundred by only using one gamecard.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
lol they could atleast let somebody who could speak propper english do the intervieuw.. and its not overkill for gaming it sucks for gaming cause first not using sli , but that amd chip.. is just not good enuf.
If you really want to efficiently use the power of a high power PC, then you just don't want a operating system that is consuming significantly of that PC.
Impressive machine. Bit overkill for gamin though ^^ But splendid for tomographics. Btw, 32bit OS's only suppord 3,3-3,4 gb of RAM, something like it anyway. But most definatively not 4gb, not without some serious foulhacking.
Somehow I completely fail to see the point of the discussion going on about 32-bit OS's. FASTRA uses WinXP-64, so none of the memory limits apply to this machine :)
Probably better to use the HD 4870 since they cost less and perform equally well or even better in some cases. The 4870 also has the faster DDR5 RAM and the faster bus.
For such applications like the reconstruction of ct data it is a cheap solution to use GPUs because almost all algorithms work independently on data which is required for parallel execution.But when it comes to more complex task having to synchronize results,the GPU will drasticly drop in performance.Moreover by work temperatures at 100°C running numerical computations is not advised.Who can say that the result the GPUs have computed is correct.There's no error correction.PS3 is better here.
Call Julie the ugly crack head at 717-697-5454. If you want to remain "unknown" then dial *67 before the number. *6717176975454. 717-697-5454.
Call anytime!! She put her boobs in my friend's face and he almost puked. He said they smelled like someone took a crap on her and rotten Garbage.
She had sex with a homeless man because she was drunk. I think that guy might have puked too. She likes 2 stay dirty and not take showers. 717-697-5454
Wow my cock is fatter than that guys arms, but shit thats fucking impressive, get me on of those if i was a scientist doing those kinda calculations!!!!!!!!!
From his posts on the tomshardware forum that he mentions on the website FAQ: "I am CERTAIN that this thing is useful. We are already using it to speed up our computations by a factor of 50 on a single 8800GTX card. It scales well for my application. More GPUs directly means more speed, almost linearly, as PCI-Express bandwidth is NOT the bottleneck."
Also: "A 9800GTX card is faster than a single GPU on the 9800GX2 card. For games, using two GPUs typically does not result in double framerates. For our tomography computations, doubling the number of GPUs does result in double computation speed. Therefore, using 9800GX2 cards provides us with much more computation power than using 9800GTX cards."
And it seems they're using CUDA which is Nvidia only, so we'll have to wait some time before they try to catch up with SPU counts...
Technology is moving so quickly! ATI's RV770 will have 960 'stream processing units' PER CARD. So if they use four of those, that's an astounding 3840 SPUs per computer! Already, they can quadruple their speed! AMAZING!!
Multiplying the processors does not necessarily mean multiplying the speed. There are pipelining and parallelizing issues that make it difficult. Of course, when you're averaging an exclamation mark every sentence, I'm sure it doesn't matter.
I go by their website: "Having eight graphics processors work in parallel allows this system to perform as fast as 350 modern CPU cores for our tomography tasks, reducing the reconstruction times from several weeks (on a normal PC) to hours."
They're only working from 1024 SPUs, and I certainly believe 9840 will reduce these times even further.
I seriously doubt that 3 ps3s even come close to the computational power of 4 9800GX2s. After all, the ps3 GPU was based on a GeForce 7 if I remember right....
dunno about the cpus, but still. One G92 chip has ~750M transistors. One Cell has ~250M(and a Q6600 400-500M i think). So unless the Cell uses some never before seen ultra-optimized computing mode, I don't think 3x250M transistors can come close to 8x750M. And yes, I am aware that the cells work at a much higher frequency than the G92s on the 9800GX2. Come to think of it, I don't think 3 cells could measure up to 3 quad-cores running at the same speed, judging from transistor count.
This is awesome. High Tech stuff is getting more powerfull and cheaper everyday. Someday, we might have stuff on par with NASA for something like 2000$
i wonder what you guys could do with those new GT280 GPU from Nvidia... the word is that a single GT280 is about 50% faster than the G92 (in this case, the 9800 GX2)...
They didn't make them work...at least not for graphics. According to the article, they were using the GPUs to do physics calculations. They most likely wrote a program with 4 or 8 threads and divided them among the cards or cores to run in parallel. The results were read into memory, not displayed on a monitor.
Wake up, girls these days are after such geeks. Also big kudos to nVidia for this. I think this architecture has some serious horsepower and can easily replace $milion dollar super computers here and there. AMD should so the same, their latest GPUs have even more stream processors...
That was absolutely amazing. While I'm still not a graduate, as an engineer of Computer Science, the idea of having that many processors working in parallel is absolutely remarkable. As a quick side note, I've seen many consumer motherboards offer 2x Graphics (pci-x?) ports for use, but you mentioned that 4 were being used in parallel here. Which board(s) are capable of performing such a feat?
i don't see why its so amazing :S i believe the 780i mobo has 4 slots for gpus. and i think the cards they are using is the 9800x2, one card has two gpus. so if they have 4 of those, thats technically 8.
lol. i'm assuming you're a console dumbass? just because new parts come out, doesn't mean you need to get them. you can build a computer from the GROUND UP, for a grand. and if you want to keep playing games on highest, then u need to upgrade every 3-4 years, and then, its only going to be like the video card, so $350.
consoles cost $400-$500 without accessories/games, and they last 8 years, with crappy fps and limited options.
It is not only the OS that enables the access to 4GB RAM. It cannot be reduced to counting bits and bringing it to the power of two.
A major problem of accessing the full range of 4 GB is often related to the memory mapping of peripheral devices like PCI(e) Cards. The BIOS maps them into the upper region (>3.2gb) of the RAM to gain access to e.g. device registers. Without changing the mapping an OS (even linux) cannot access the full 4GB.
They don't need the GPU's to communicate with each other. They just need them to communicate with the CPU. This is why no SLI is needed. Also the only motherboard that had the space and slots for four double-slot graphics cards was an AMD quad-crossfire motherboard which (of course) doesn't support SLI anyways. So yes, they work them in parallel.
i'm such an asshole when i started lmao within the first 10 seconds.
NoNiceNamesLeft 2 months ago
they have such a powerful pc and their O.S. is xp
aleemkirk 4 months ago
Can I just say this is a fantastic video demonstrating the use of CUDA technology. I use it to show to all developers of our software that might benefit from it.
sniperdoc8404 7 months ago
Put thirteen tesla c2070s in that thing and you'll be done in a matter of minutes I'm sure.
kkjgg112391 11 months ago
@kkjgg112391 tesla actually wouldnt be optimal for this. gaming cards with dual gpus offer a better density of processing power
ashinms 3 months ago
Comment removed
sypros 1 year ago
5:12 ehhhhhhhhh!!!! ROFLMAO, I love u guys and girl (L).
HatefulXD 1 year ago
So.... four HD5970s = 12800 stream processors.... holy shit
dunlrock 1 year ago
Would have been better if it had 4 Asus ares.
dfsa90 1 year ago
Oh my god, guy is so nerd hehe, but don't worry dude, your knowledge about computers is amazing.
The4670 1 year ago
Would you have to re-code a program to utilize CUDA like they did with FASTRA? Like Lets say I want to use a GPU, say a GTX295, to compile a really complex map for a newer game like Crysis or HL2, something that takes hours even on multi-core computers. Basically I want to know if you could get current windows apps to use a GPU like that? Let's say Sandbox2?
drchronic1620 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A GPU means general processing unit.
lostinseganet 2 years ago
i think its graphics p u. Not to sure i could be wrong
EIN771 2 years ago
It used to mean that just years ago, but with CUDA,GPGPU and all sorts of new stuff, graphic cards are now largely used for more general use as well. Not sure how largely that is used... Maybe some hardcore gaming gear producer could use GPU in the meaning of "Gaming p u" ;)
jipasd 2 years ago
Nope nope its general it is just that graphic took the concept to the hilt.
lostinseganet 2 years ago
cpu is central processing unit and gpu is graphics processing unit.
feki122 2 years ago 2
@lostinseganet
You're thinking of GPGPU (GP-GPU) General-Purpose Graphics Processing Unit
1337ASM 2 years ago
@lostinseganet
GPU means Graphics processing unit
kornsaq 1 year ago
3:10 crysis looks like with an average of 23fps...
DarkZomby01 2 years ago 2
I wonder if this will beat it
I7 920 4GHZ OC
3 x GTX 285 OC
12GB DDR3
christlubas 2 years ago
i7 975 oc
4 295 oc
12 gb oc :)
Highend water cooling = a hell of a lot better
GoatHornz 2 years ago 3
URAAA well 4 GTX 295 if it works with 9800GX2 why not on this one
christlubas 2 years ago
24GB ftw!
mugen1237 2 years ago
core i7 920
nvidia 295 quad sli
12GB corsair ram
37474748 2 years ago
My question would be, how hard would it be to implement traditional load balancing/message passing so you could make a cluster of these systems, all using GPU power?
unnaturaltragedy 2 years ago
I know its insane and probably wont be made but wouldnt it be great to do almost like a complete PC sli setup... connecting motherboard to motherboard for twice the shared performance
patpat070 2 years ago
I have one 9800gx2 and i experience slight micro stutter, users with quad sli with that card experience a bit more stutter... what would four 9800gx2's be like. You would need a very nice chipset to allow those cards to work in synergy.
patpat070 2 years ago
Omg 4 times Gforce? haha omg XD
Crysis at 150fps? omg owned XD
Great Video!
Rmvoo69 2 years ago
Crysis! Crysis! Crysis!
I reckon about 100FPS :D
conizme1 2 years ago 2
Squidge, are you not listening? I will make it easy for you, Quote..."it has four graphics cards, each containing two GPU`s, so this is eight GPU`s working in total...Each GPU has 128 processors...for a total of more than a thousand small processors working together. Can you understand that? Get your facts together before embarrassing yourself again in front of all these smart people in here.
bobk100 2 years ago
The most you can do is Quad SLI, meaning only 2 of those dual cards could be used for games. But for other tasks like folding@home all GPUs can be used.
deicida6 2 years ago 2
wow you guys are awesome specially for 4000 euros compared too buying a # NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 or the newer versions that cost around 2000$ each making it around 8000$ just the cards them selfs and rather using 4 9800 gx2 now only costing around 200$ u found a way to make it work by using xp 64bit for the 8 gigs of ram and xp for actually sporting the 8 gpu's on those 4cards genius for that i give you 5 stars and a standing ovation lol for the guy playing crysis lol u guys couldn't help it
chino555 2 years ago
Picture Dr Joost with; contacts, black turtleneck and sports coat, and five o`clock shadow...BAM-chick magnet!
Oh yeah, and MR MastaSquidge I suggest you rewatch video from around 3:30 so you can see that your answer was WRONG!
bobk100 2 years ago
My answer is not wrong. It would run crysis just the same as a single 9800 GX2 would. Which isnt too bad of a card on its own.
THE FOUR CARDS ARE NOT IN SLI! Look. It could not be any more painfully clear that there is no SLI bridge in there. Therefore these cards will NOT all function together to render graphics on a single output.
So to whoever gave my comment a thumbs down, I suggest you read up on how nvidia's cuda software works.
MastaSquidge 2 years ago 3
That man... is hot
34r0n 3 years ago
that could run crysis at 150fps!
KJIgravitypwns 3 years ago
Actually it couldnt, they are not connected via SLI.
If you play crysis it would function as though it had one GPU.
MastaSquidge 3 years ago 3
If you could buy it run for example vista on it and play games, it would possibly be the best pc you can buy for your desk
paparelidis 3 years ago
You can, the video shows him running a game. But as I said to another guy, it would only function as though there is one GPU for games because they are not connected in SLI.
MastaSquidge 3 years ago
OMG, I go to that University and I didn't know we had this? O.o' a shame :p
MatvaNabor 3 years ago
yeah i know the movie is going to rock pinurl [dot] com/hf3
shenjuaner 3 years ago
you wanted mass amounts of power and you chose nvidia, run that by me again(4870=1200gigaflops) so 4x 4870x2 would be 9600gigaflops...
qwertymac93 3 years ago
Look at the date
dabocx56 3 years ago
what about it? that wasn't too long before the 4800 cards came out, they should have waited, you should never buy cards right before the next gen.
qwertymac93 3 years ago
This is nonsense. The project was started right after the 9800GX2 cards became available in Europe. What you are forgetting here, is that such a project takes time, and the movie was recorded after it was done. Besides, the NVIDIA CUDA platform was used, which does not run on ATI cards.
kjoos001 3 years ago 3
hmm, i supose your right, what does ati use? opencl?
qwertymac93 3 years ago
ATI has a platform called Stream Computing for writing general-purpose GPU code. One one hand, choosing a particular platform results in vendor-lock-in, but on the other hand it allows for specific optimizations compared to more general (openGL-based) programs.
kjoos001 3 years ago
why not design the hardware for the software? o mean, opengl is more capable then dx, yet some of its features arent usable with gpus...
qwertymac93 3 years ago
That's basically the concept of programmable hardware, such as FPGA's. The major advantage of using gaming hardware (which was not designed for general computations) is that it's backed up by a huge user base, resulting in low costs.
kjoos001 3 years ago
id like to know how you got sli to work with k9a2 platinum(best mobo ever)
qwertymac93 3 years ago
if we are whatching this video, chances are we know what a gpu is, come on an.
qwertymac93 3 years ago
did you try to look that nerdy? you had too...
qwertymac93 3 years ago
where is you lab located, what is you closing hours and what level of security do you have if any?
.......he he he he he
godscuttingyoudown 3 years ago
poindexter
osmanjunaid 3 years ago
awesome work, an inspiration to all at folding@home
up2in2 3 years ago
"let's call him Bob" lol doesn't the guy have a real name? and omg, this guy looks so effin' smart. he's stereotypically what a super nerd should look and sound like.
johnbarryballaran 3 years ago
dude, the playmobile guy is called bob, not that doctor
1994Danny1994 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dating travel romance + find your partner or have fun solo meetyourfling(.Com)
morson
kdebuggin 3 years ago
the redhead was playing crysis!!!
dunlrock 3 years ago 7
Lol this isnt gaming PC... All graphics cards are just made to calculate and not to play games. I'ts a nice thing to know how that gaming crap can actualy be used for somthing usefull.
TechFreakNo1 3 years ago 2
I WANT NAO!!
TheAussie00 3 years ago 2
Nice! Can you use this type of supercomputer to encode HD videos 1000 times faster then with an Intel X86 processor?
Charbax 3 years ago
Yes. But you have to write dedicated software that parallels the algorithms. The gain by using gamecards is solely due to some algorithms are suited for parallelization. Video compression is one such. If the algorithm is heavily dependant on previous calculations then you will run slower on a graphics card than on the CPU.
Some Matlab and Mathematika libraries already use parallelized algorithms that speed up the computation time by a hundred by only using one gamecard.
hoplahey 3 years ago
why do they all look like stereotipical nerds?:D
Eddy6100 3 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol they could atleast let somebody who could speak propper english do the intervieuw.. and its not overkill for gaming it sucks for gaming cause first not using sli , but that amd chip.. is just not good enuf.
glenluyckx12 3 years ago
win xp lOl waste of machine hahahaha
aztecsavo82 3 years ago
Don't tell me you have a faster machine on YOUR desk ;)
kjoos001 3 years ago 2
More or less, but it would Minimum another operating system to tap my Monster HARDCORE PC ;)
COFCOFLINUXCOFCOF
aztecsavo82 3 years ago
If you really want to efficiently use the power of a high power PC, then you just don't want a operating system that is consuming significantly of that PC.
Mathijsweb 3 years ago
What kind of mobo did they have?
ArmyOfAngelz 3 years ago
MSI K9A2 Platinum
kjoos001 3 years ago
Impressive machine. Bit overkill for gamin though ^^ But splendid for tomographics. Btw, 32bit OS's only suppord 3,3-3,4 gb of RAM, something like it anyway. But most definatively not 4gb, not without some serious foulhacking.
Xaeron187 3 years ago
Somehow I completely fail to see the point of the discussion going on about 32-bit OS's. FASTRA uses WinXP-64, so none of the memory limits apply to this machine :)
kjoos001 3 years ago 4
Great work, guys! Looking forward to possible future upgrades with GeForces GTX 280!
Lexoka 3 years ago
Probably better to use the HD 4870 since they cost less and perform equally well or even better in some cases. The 4870 also has the faster DDR5 RAM and the faster bus.
nidaros1112 3 years ago
Hi bob!
flummer01 3 years ago
Sweet!
Was that Crysis you were playing for a moment? The (2nd) perfect test for your hardware!
airmaus 3 years ago
i´ve got 2 of those Gfx cards i think i buy 2 more.
tehtunez 3 years ago
g33k :)
pjebarakus 3 years ago 3
A very lucky g33k though ;)
kjoos001 3 years ago
you could cut heating cost in the winter by leaving the heater off, and just having that pc running in yo room!! =P
LETHLSS 3 years ago 2
For such applications like the reconstruction of ct data it is a cheap solution to use GPUs because almost all algorithms work independently on data which is required for parallel execution.But when it comes to more complex task having to synchronize results,the GPU will drasticly drop in performance.Moreover by work temperatures at 100°C running numerical computations is not advised.Who can say that the result the GPUs have computed is correct.There's no error correction.PS3 is better here.
glkdestructor 3 years ago
they are using a "AMD Phenom 9850 processor". Cell might be a better clock, but it really lacks the cache which this would need
NephilimDJ 3 years ago
I wants that PC! :P
ab123110 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Call Julie the ugly crack head at 717-697-5454. If you want to remain "unknown" then dial *67 before the number. *6717176975454. 717-697-5454.
Call anytime!! She put her boobs in my friend's face and he almost puked. He said they smelled like someone took a crap on her and rotten Garbage.
She had sex with a homeless man because she was drunk. I think that guy might have puked too. She likes 2 stay dirty and not take showers. 717-697-5454
DirtyGirlRyou 3 years ago
lol i wont it but the guys a skinny twig lol
russellnolanz 3 years ago
NEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD! I so want that computer.
provoko 3 years ago
Wow my cock is fatter than that guys arms, but shit thats fucking impressive, get me on of those if i was a scientist doing those kinda calculations!!!!!!!!!
foxorroxors 3 years ago
amazing
duffyMM 3 years ago
From the press release!
"The Vision Lab is now planning to build a cluster of such systems, which will allow for real-time reconstruction of large 3D volumes."
scroll2b 3 years ago
From his posts on the tomshardware forum that he mentions on the website FAQ: "I am CERTAIN that this thing is useful. We are already using it to speed up our computations by a factor of 50 on a single 8800GTX card. It scales well for my application. More GPUs directly means more speed, almost linearly, as PCI-Express bandwidth is NOT the bottleneck."
scroll2b 3 years ago
Also: "A 9800GTX card is faster than a single GPU on the 9800GX2 card. For games, using two GPUs typically does not result in double framerates. For our tomography computations, doubling the number of GPUs does result in double computation speed. Therefore, using 9800GX2 cards provides us with much more computation power than using 9800GTX cards."
And it seems they're using CUDA which is Nvidia only, so we'll have to wait some time before they try to catch up with SPU counts...
scroll2b 3 years ago
but will it run crysis?
digitallysick 3 years ago
it will run but not on maxed out settings... Not even NASA can do that.
deadman45326 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How Gay
TheHowGayGuy 3 years ago
Technology is moving so quickly! ATI's RV770 will have 960 'stream processing units' PER CARD. So if they use four of those, that's an astounding 3840 SPUs per computer! Already, they can quadruple their speed! AMAZING!!
scroll2b 3 years ago
Multiplying the processors does not necessarily mean multiplying the speed. There are pipelining and parallelizing issues that make it difficult. Of course, when you're averaging an exclamation mark every sentence, I'm sure it doesn't matter.
MajorGeneralPanic 3 years ago
I go by their website: "Having eight graphics processors work in parallel allows this system to perform as fast as 350 modern CPU cores for our tomography tasks, reducing the reconstruction times from several weeks (on a normal PC) to hours."
They're only working from 1024 SPUs, and I certainly believe 9840 will reduce these times even further.
scroll2b 3 years ago
I meant 3840...
scroll2b 3 years ago
They're using CUDA so they wouldn't be able to use ATI cards for it. But 960 stream processors per card? holy shit.
getoffmyfrigginlawn 3 years ago
ATI's and Nvidia's SPUs are quite different, so it's not really the same. Apples and oranges.
Draw3n 3 years ago
Are you wearing a gum-shield by any chance ?
ATPADPenergy 3 years ago
I want you to be my baby's father, Dr. Batenburg.
elcid1984 3 years ago
Dr. Batenburg, you are awesome.
kanchi1120 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
OMG that was so annoying, I want to punch that guy in the face. I can understand he's foreign but his voice was like the scratching of a chalkboard.
The whole video can be summed up to: There is this thing called tomography that renders stuff in 3D and this pc running 8 gpu's can do it fast
miketheman247 3 years ago
thank you for executing the obvious. this is the way it should be done.
jugzter 3 years ago
you are very cool and i like you hair very much!
aribenzane 3 years ago 2
Faster and Faster - ... - ;-)
Balmer1 3 years ago
good job man
farhadna 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
geeklol
LyricalWax 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I was like WOW that is the nerd of the year award winner! They should have his picture in the dictionary!
GTTTGT 3 years ago
impressive cabling!
mluu510 3 years ago
this was awesome and very funny
atushbeef 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh fuck. typical geeky person
CabalaCicero 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think 3 ps3 works better and cheaper too
Nickiewoo 3 years ago
I seriously doubt that 3 ps3s even come close to the computational power of 4 9800GX2s. After all, the ps3 GPU was based on a GeForce 7 if I remember right....
Bloodred16ro 3 years ago 3
i think he meant if they used the cell cpu's on the ps3, not the gpu
solidunit 3 years ago
dunno about the cpus, but still. One G92 chip has ~750M transistors. One Cell has ~250M(and a Q6600 400-500M i think). So unless the Cell uses some never before seen ultra-optimized computing mode, I don't think 3x250M transistors can come close to 8x750M. And yes, I am aware that the cells work at a much higher frequency than the G92s on the 9800GX2. Come to think of it, I don't think 3 cells could measure up to 3 quad-cores running at the same speed, judging from transistor count.
Bloodred16ro 3 years ago 2
I think in implantls of dentistry we have 3d tomografy of the mandibular and maxilar bone's... see "simplant" ;)
Kilingme 3 years ago
What's your 3DMark score?! XD
DanielDane9 3 years ago 2
This is awesome. High Tech stuff is getting more powerfull and cheaper everyday. Someday, we might have stuff on par with NASA for something like 2000$
JusticeJanitor 3 years ago
Faster and Faster (and Secure?) .... (Do what you can!) - Nice ;-)
Balmer1 3 years ago
# AMD Phenom 9850 processor + Scythe Infinity CPU cooler # 4x MSI 9800GX2 graphics card # 4x 2GB Corsair Twinx DDR2 PC6400 memory # MSI K9A2 Platinum motherboard # Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB HDD # ThermalTake Toughpower 1500W Modular PSU # Lian-Li PC-P80 Armorsuit case # Windows XP 64-bit
was what thay used
rasmussen29892 3 years ago
i wonder what you guys could do with those new GT280 GPU from Nvidia... the word is that a single GT280 is about 50% faster than the G92 (in this case, the 9800 GX2)...
intel shoud be really mad rigt now!
tiranusdj 3 years ago
they should have put a mouse in the tomograph, lol!
AugZF 3 years ago
Goes to show gaming might end up saving someones life
PerseptionI812 3 years ago 6
i wonder what cpu he is using
tetranoob 3 years ago
Wow mastermind nerd~ respect!But i dont like the name, suggestion > Gangstra~
oalejis 3 years ago
OK I NEED ONE NOW HOW DO I MAKE ONE LOL
dals18 3 years ago
They didn't make them work...at least not for graphics. According to the article, they were using the GPUs to do physics calculations. They most likely wrote a program with 4 or 8 threads and divided them among the cards or cores to run in parallel. The results were read into memory, not displayed on a monitor.
thesanders 3 years ago
Anime25.
It's windows XP not vista :D
So you still need to search to see windows vista running fast. Lolz
oxyking 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm sorry but I just couldn't work with this guy.
Javindo 3 years ago
I bet you could look at some serious boobies on that mamma jamma.
donkeytime 3 years ago
Is anyone else viewing this video with a very low framerate?
CandyHam 3 years ago
sounds like to me you need a Fastra.
thesanders 3 years ago 5
haha. Strangely it seems to be working fine now....
God damn, that guy isn't helping the stereotypes associated with nerds.
CandyHam 3 years ago
Wake up, girls these days are after such geeks. Also big kudos to nVidia for this. I think this architecture has some serious horsepower and can easily replace $milion dollar super computers here and there. AMD should so the same, their latest GPUs have even more stream processors...
atlanticus 3 years ago
To be fair, I thought he was doing the opposite. His glasses and shirt were pretty fly and it's obvious he is pretty smart.
lnVerTeD 3 years ago
i hear you
alecdddd 3 years ago
That was absolutely amazing. While I'm still not a graduate, as an engineer of Computer Science, the idea of having that many processors working in parallel is absolutely remarkable. As a quick side note, I've seen many consumer motherboards offer 2x Graphics (pci-x?) ports for use, but you mentioned that 4 were being used in parallel here. Which board(s) are capable of performing such a feat?
RanmaSaotome83 3 years ago
it is probably a custom made board or just cords connecting the cards together and then in turn to the computer
tenioman 3 years ago
i don't see why its so amazing :S i believe the 780i mobo has 4 slots for gpus. and i think the cards they are using is the 9800x2, one card has two gpus. so if they have 4 of those, thats technically 8.
hab1b1 3 years ago
no. it is actually pretty amazing. and a 780i does not have 4 slots for graphic cards, only 3.
thesanders 3 years ago
When are you sending me my Fastra system?
nukedmaster 3 years ago
Well require an upgrade next month.
MrPing1000 3 years ago
lol. i'm assuming you're a console dumbass? just because new parts come out, doesn't mean you need to get them. you can build a computer from the GROUND UP, for a grand. and if you want to keep playing games on highest, then u need to upgrade every 3-4 years, and then, its only going to be like the video card, so $350.
consoles cost $400-$500 without accessories/games, and they last 8 years, with crappy fps and limited options.
GTFO.
hab1b1 3 years ago
I was joking.
Why so serious? lol.
MrPing1000 3 years ago
o it was a good place to spread the info, and well...that was a pretty retarded comment :)
hab1b1 3 years ago
Fair Enough! I'll take his word for it, it probably works :)
Although Dr. Batenburg is a gigantic nerd I feel strangely reassured about the world of academia
OmarS 3 years ago 2
It's got 8 processores!
xentrox 3 years ago
Can it run Crysis at max settings at full speed? Please show us!
megamix 3 years ago 3
yeah :]
darkwooly 3 years ago
can someone tell me, does xp detects 8gb of RAM?
i think vista home premium can detects only 3gb of RAM...
I'm curious...and i'm not an expert..sorry if i'm misunderstand.
bajukuyup 3 years ago
32-bit OS support up to 3GB of RAM, 64-bit OS can detect more memory than you can ever imagine. Both XP and Vista come in 32 and 64-bit versions.
megamix 3 years ago
thanks a lot... it really helps.... have a good day!
bajukuyup 3 years ago
A 32-bit OS supports up to 4GB of RAM, as 2^32 bytes = 4GB, it just so happens that 32 bit XP supports 3GB due to a flaw of design.
hfutrell 3 years ago
It is not only the OS that enables the access to 4GB RAM. It cannot be reduced to counting bits and bringing it to the power of two.
A major problem of accessing the full range of 4 GB is often related to the memory mapping of peripheral devices like PCI(e) Cards. The BIOS maps them into the upper region (>3.2gb) of the RAM to gain access to e.g. device registers. Without changing the mapping an OS (even linux) cannot access the full 4GB.
glkdestructor 3 years ago 2
Except they clearly use Windows XP 64-bit which supports 4 GB. It's not a flaw in 32-bit XP either.
nidaros1112 3 years ago
Wat een nerd in dat filmke
attix15 3 years ago
Oei! Ik zie daar een tumor in meneer Playmobil zijn hoofd :O
sirhendro 3 years ago
Excellent. One question: do you guys use SLI bridges to connect them to make them work in parallel?
Romulus47plus1 3 years ago
I doubt SLI is used. In GPGPU, you address each card separately.
krilli 3 years ago
Yeah you're right. I visited their page ady
Romulus47plus1 3 years ago
next time they're have 4 4870 X2 with 2Gbs of gddr5 each O_o, ultra 1600 watt power supply anyone lol
golem72002 3 years ago
They don't need the GPU's to communicate with each other. They just need them to communicate with the CPU. This is why no SLI is needed. Also the only motherboard that had the space and slots for four double-slot graphics cards was an AMD quad-crossfire motherboard which (of course) doesn't support SLI anyways. So yes, they work them in parallel.
hiddenblood 3 years ago 2