ZOOMED EXPLOSIONS - WTC7 - Salomon Building - Building7

[aczjbr]

URGENT - FRAUD "A & E TRUTH."

Effondrement des tours jumelles

The analysis of the explosives expert Jowenko was used by conspiracy theorists to show that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished. In the same interview, he explains that the controlled demolition of the twin towers is impossible. Dynamite would have exploded right away, and it would have taken a year to put everything in place. in English.

w w w . dailymotion. com / video/x2l5k9 _ effondrement-des-tours-jumelle­­­­­s_ news

[cjnewson88]

herp derp controlled bombs in de building derp herp derp

[WarCrime911]

TOP FIVE MOST FAMOUS 911 CONSPIRATORS:

L. Paul Bremer - Part owner of Komatsu which patented a thermite demolition charge in 1996, went on national TV instead of going to work in the WTC on 9/11 to tell us it was Osama and we should start a war.

Dick Cheney - NORAD Stand Down orders

Wirt D. Walker III - CIA front company manager for WTC

Marvin Bush - Managed WTC Security Company up until 9/11

Barry McDaniel - Black Ops demolition expert and CEO of Stratesec

[wellifthemediasaysit]

mystyplx is an obvious shill, read what he writes...

[quarkmuffin37]

@wellifthemediasaysit - yes youre right a quick look at his subscriptions and friends shows at least two other notorious 911 shill trawler vermin - ctcole77 and godzilla1077. I have had numerous colorful conversations with both of them. They just cut and paste their BS into comments fields and personal messages, they are part of a scam that has thought of every little hare-brained explanation to inside job evidence, its quite sophisticated but just remember BACK AND TO THE LEFT. It is what it is

[Mystylplx]

@quarkmuffin37

Ah, the moaning and groaning of those who don't have any facts to back up their fantasies. What do truthers do when they lose a debate? Call their opponent a "shill" and pretend they really won.

Pathetic.

[FreedumbFarter28]

@wellifthemediasaysit same old SPAM i see

[Mystylplx]

Those are not explosions. Explosions capable of severing steel h-beams are LOUD. Watch v=79sJ1bMR6VQ to HEAR what real explosions sound like.

[jmminu]

@Mystylplx Loud explosions can be heard in some of the new footage and eye witnesses close enough to the scene reported multiple fireworks like explosions just before the collapse. That's not only in building 7 but in the other 2 as well. It has been revealed that NIST has edited the sound in most videos released to the public. If explosives didn't make those building collapse but light fires did, no insurance company would ever want to insure steel frame buildings.

[Mystylplx]

@jmminu

Not nearly loud enough. Again--

v=79sJ1bMR6VQ

Those are what explosions capable of severing steel columns sound like. They would have been heard by everyone for blocks and blocks around, not just those up close.

And claiming NIST edited the sound is a rather transparent dodge. They didn't even have access to those videos until months after they were already on youtube and in the media.

[FreedumbFighter28]

@Mystylplx<-hahahah..NIST edited multiple tapes.Most notably the one used at the cspan NIST press conference That edit was to take out the explosion heard before the collapse..They go on to say that NO EXPLOSIONS, or witnesses saying they heard explosions, or videotaped evidence of explosions..EXISTED.PERIOD....­That is called lying. You would have to accpet a couple of things of course. For starters that you will believe anything anyone tells you, as long as its on TV and from the government.

[Mystylplx]

@FreedumbFighter28

Nonsense. There are plenty of tapes. Keep dreaming. 

[FreedumbFighter28]

@Mystylplx <---I promised myself my debating days about this are over because I made 3 movies exposing NIST's bs press conference. The video evidence in question was the one WITH the explosion...but surprisingly at the press conference they contented it had no sound...XD

That in itself is a lie, let alone all the countless others. Your more than welcome to watch it and hear it.

[Mystylplx]

@FreedumbFighter28

Which video are you referring to?

[FreedumbFighter28]

@Mystylplx

I think he was talking about the CSPAN press conference presentation used to make the 3 movies.

After a couple years, and a lengthy court battle, NIST was forced to show us %90 of the evidence they used.To our amazement, the video they used in the press conference, is the same video that has the explosions..but at the press conference, as you can see in our video,he tells the press that.."NO EXPLOSIONS were EVER heard on tape". They audio wiped it before the press conference

[FreedumbFighter28]

@Mystylplx

/watch?v=UMZwW7OsXYs see for yourself.....

[Mystylplx]

@FreedumbFighter28

Yep. Not an explosion loud enough to sever steel columns. Like I thought.

[galaxything]

@Mystylplx youtube.com/watch?v=wV69ZByB0x­E&feature=results_main&playnex­t=1&list=PL2CAA3AEC90DB1EB3 is that loud enough? Also thermite / thermate doesn't make an explosion noise at all.

[Mystylplx]

@galaxything

Nope. Not nearly loud enough. You aren't getting it--a bomb capable of severing steel columns is LOUD. Audible to EVERYONE for blocks and blocks around. Again--

v=79sJ1bMR6VQ

And you're right. Thermite is silent. As a theory though, it has MAJOR other problems which is why the new hip theory on the part of truthers is nano-thermite, which is no quieter than any other explosive.

[galaxything]

@Mystylplx I just been watching lots of clips showing fire fighters / cops / workers / new reporters etc... all talking of huge explosions and other bombs in the buildings. And that explosion in that video is easy loud enough. If a bomb that big cant hurt steel than an open fire cant lol this is what you call a fire youtube.com/watch?v=9E4kCS-LsF­I didn't fall stell didnt even glow red

[Mystylplx]

@galaxything

Not loud enough and only one--not even close. There were a few people who heard explosions but explosions are normal in office fires. Things explode in fires. But the kind of numerous repeated explosions in a controlled demolition would have been heard unmistakably by thousands and thousands of people for blocks around like in the video I showed. There was NOTHING like that on 911.

And the fires didn't sever the columns. The fires softened the steel. Big difference.

[galaxything]

@Mystylplx the explosions were going off from the moment the planes hit, that's till the towers fell. That's 1.5 hrs of explosions but of course seperated by time or it would of been to obvious. they are easy loud enough don't forget they are cutter charges, all of the force is directional you need to learn this stuff!! The explosions are heard constantly ever few minutes a few go off, then when the buidling start to fall thats when they blow the rest.

[Mystylplx]

@galaxything

No. Not nearly loud enough. Here's what explosions capable of severing steel columns sound like--

v=79sJ1bMR6VQ

Notice those are loud enough that EVERYONE for blocks around unmistakably heard them. On 911 maybe a few hundred people heard some small explosions. That is perfectly normal in fires. Things explode in fires--junction boxes, cleaning supplies, sealed thermoses, even fire extinguishers can explode in fires.

[galaxything]

@Mystylplx lol dude those explosions are the same even less noise than some of the wtc ones. That video of the fire fighters on the phone then there is 2 explosions MUCH louder than those in that video. not to mention thermite doesn't make any sound! The explosives and thermite used in the 3 wtc buildings were state of the art cutting edge military secret stuff. not the standard shit used by demo companies! But you can find plenty of videos audible and visual showing them go off.

[galaxything]

@Mystylplx youtube.com/watch?v=y24_hSFRM3­M&feature=related

[galaxything]

@Mystylplx watch this then and go find all these people and argue with them and tell them they were just imagining it all :p youtube.com/watch?v=PfxkcBmZfK­0

[Mystylplx]

@galaxything

Try and focus. Try hard. They aren't imagining anything--things explode in fires. They are just wrong if they think it was bombs. Get it?

[Dannavy85]

a ha! those are clearly sequenced charges!

Are you an expert shit head?

[Vanessa220002000]

...even if the blasts progressed top to bottom to fit the pancaking argument: they would still be progressing faster than anything could ever fall. There's just no crazy idea in any unlikely scenario that can explain these squibs without explosives.

[Mystylplx]

@Vanessa220002000

It's actually very simple. As the floors are collapsing air gets pushed out the sides. That's what you are seeing.

[HQMichaelJackson]

You have got to tell that we all have to fi... Error!

Sexy body!

[JanitorMaster]

If you bend glass, it breaks, yknow

[dan917x]

@JanitorMaster you can see the windows breaking from the bottom up. If the building collapsed in a "pancake" like NIST would like to believe, the windows would break from the top to the bottom.

[Mystylplx]

@dan917x

Actually you can see windows breaking all over the place, top, bottom, middle... not unexpected since the entire building was under enormous stress.

[SteevDragon67]

a ha! those are clearly sequenced charges! you only see those in controlled demolitions! don't tell me it wasn't an inside job!

[boxa888]

u see the front towarnds the bottom right corner on the normal video you see like 4 flashes as that part crumbles! just check it out. it was messed up!

[godzilla1077]

@SteevDragon67 You're an idiot if you think so.

[SteevDragon67]

@godzilla1077 You're entitled to your opinion.

[phalsephlagphloozie]

This was not a standard demo. It has to be stealthy. Same with the first two towers, but they got caught at it anyway.

[magnuson123]

In standard demolition they destroy the ground floors and let gravity do the work.

Here you see "explosions" but no collapse! Does not make sense!!!

911 was NO inside job!!! Spread the truth!!!

[magnuson123]

How could this be a proof when the building collapsed from down to up? If there where bombs on the roof, it would have collapsed the other way!

911 was NO inside job!!!

[JSSTyger]

In standard demolitions the explosives run from bottom to top so that the bottom falls out and allows the top portions to "free fall" and gain mega crushing energy.

If concrete floors were pancaking then the puffs would be going from top to bottom. The observed phenomenon cannot be due to pancaking.

Column buckling is out the window as well. That is the corner which was gouged at the bottom. That corner column is thus under no axial stress...buckling is impossible

It was demo'ed

[bweazel]

Those are windows busting. It was probably all done with thermate on the central core. Do the core first, on every floor. Then once those are done. Cut every single remaining column on the first floor and bam. You have yourself a symmetric, parallel to the ground collapse. Let's not forget these CDs were suppose to look like natural collapses. It very well may have been that simple.

[garet0007]

...So they planted explosives on the outside corner of the building? Are you fucking retarded?

[FullmetalSasuke10]

why?

[lolAskdzuihzl]

SHOCKING !!

THANKS FOR THE CLOSE UP

[trevorpickering]

can we be sure that is WTC7

[keyhole911]

if you

watch?v=V0vq-r0NM4g

...you can see the original.

[poodleinsky]

ohhh shit that wascrazy

truth stands out fromerror