Light isn't as fast as they say...1 + 1= 3.. because you must count the light matter and the dark matter...the light is the 1 the dark is the plus in between just because you can't see doesn't mean it's not there energy cannot be destroyed only transferred.
Everything is born out of the darkness, even light. I believe Einstein was wrong to say light is the fast moving...really is the the dark matter aka the god particle that the mainstream scientist are scared of. In space there are black holes that light cannot ecape from...so obvoi
Information only arises from a mind. Matter does not add infomration to the genome.
Language only arises from thought / MIND. Language never "evolves" without a mind.
There's no such thing as mutations creating information. PROOF: Try creating information with an online Random Mutations Generator. Mutations destroy information. Again, information arises from a mind.
People who are taught Evolution aren't stopping to notice that there is NO evidence given for what they are being taught.
Check this out: Evolution VIDEO (DISCOVERY Channel educational series): Asserts that fish turned into dinosaurs, and dinosaurs turned into people. This is the FOUNDATION for Evolution. It is based on ZERO science.
watch?v=5W763lQR0tU
Re: our so called "origins" check this out. It is taught in all the school books: Monkeys turning into people!
DNA reveals that biological life forms are NOT purely materialistic, self-assembled products of chance; but rather the creative and purposeful product of INFORMATION and LANGUAGE (a MIND).
Evolutionists have a HUGE problem.
DNA code is information!
Information is: The communication or reception of KNOWLEDGE or INTELLIGENCE.
@SuperMerlin100 said (QUOTE): "Strange how every mind we have ever come across is the product of a materialistic brain." (END QUOTE)
Wrong.
All the activity in the brain is called "REACTIONS." The brain works with electrical impulses / neurons. What's awesome about the brain is that all observable activity (of neurons in action) do not 'cause' thought, but it's the other way around. The activity of the brain is a result of, & and reaction to, what the MIND is doing. The mind drives the brain.
@Mr88playmaker - " The activity of the brain is a result of, & and reaction to, what the MIND is doing.."
Correct. Dr. Erich Christian,an engineer in the field of Communication, explains it quite well in line with you.
Intelligence reduces TIME needed so that once Man took months or days to travel we can now do it WITHIN a DAY. GOD will be justified. Your studies are NOT going for nothing... but as for the rest..." Remembrance of them will be forgotten."
The very use of the word "Evolution" is always applied to those things that evolve via intelligent means (such as evolution of a company or a screenplay etc). The ONLY time the word "evolution" is applied to mean the OPPOSITE is by Darwinists in connection to biological evolution i.e.; one genus (kind) evolving into another genus (kind) without ANY evidence as to how or why.
@Mr88playmaker There is a great video by cdk007 called MicroEvolution vs MacroEvolution. In this video, gives a few examples speciation. Also a video by DonExodus2 called "How Evolution Works 7: Speciation" will give more examples. Have a great day.
This is objectively false. Evolution, by any definition, is simply change and never, in any context implies and intelligent agency of any kind. Neither does it imply a lack thereof. It makes no implication on the instigator of the change at all. However, when evolution is mentioned without specified context, it is generally accepted as a reference to biological evolution, which only by incident, already has an accepted explanation that doesn't require intelligent intervention.
In the foundational document for Evolution theory itself, called: "Origin Of The Species By Means Of natural Selection / Preservation Of Favoured Races In The Struggle For Life", Darwin asserts that black people are the closest relatives to apes and that white people are at the top of the beast-into-man "genus to genus" evolutionary ladder. According to Darwin, mankind has achieved various levels of evolution culminating in the white man's civilization.
@Mr88playmaker in the origin of the speicies, evolution is described metaphorically as a tree, not a ladder. With a ladder one species is over the other to show dominance. However with a tree species branch off from each other showing that each branch continues to improve and evolve. No living species is superior to any other living species in this model. Only extinct species are found at the bottom of this tree of life.
Ironically enough, your argument is a genetic fallacy. Not to mention you present a clear fallacy commonly known as poisoning the well. What Darwin believed has nothing to do with the accuracy of the modern scientific understanding of biological evolution. Whether or not your claim is accurate is irrelevant.
the casimir force. there is two possible explenations for this force. one
the force is created by electric gravity in a vacuum contracting the plates together
by an equal oriention in the field. the second possibility is that electromangetic waves passes trough the plates at a distance between them where some of them get trough the gap but the rest of them are kept apart, this can cause a differential
in force by a differetial in waves acting between and against the plates
evolution is about what genes are selected to fit small enviromental changes.
the dna is not in conflict with religion since it cannot be proven that genes
can come from nothing, og be created by functions ruled by genes that wasn´t
already there. transitions take a long time since the variations are so small in each generations. for all we know the dna might be the fingerprints of GOD
bullshit is also evolutional..thats when religious people have come a long way and get some education and than use that education for producing scienific proof of their god.
Question? If an insecticide that worked for years on certain bugs stops working is that evolution. Or is it adaptation. I've just noticed that the word evolution is thrown around a lot these days and adapting has disappeared. Is anybody even aware that Darwin was a racist? Does anybody know the full name of his book?
It doesn't matter if Darwin was racist or not neworderoldorder. Isic Newton was an jerk but we believe in gravity. Evil people believe in gravity. Is that a reason to not believe in it ourselfs. No, it isn't!
I didn't say he was evil SuperMerlin 100. His theory was used as justification for genocide. Survival of the fittest mentality. Gravity or force of gravity is self evident. Simple observation. Evolution is an old idea. As old as the greek civilization. Not new but old. Believe what you will. To me, evolution has already been shown to be wrong. Adaptation however is self evident.
No it wasn't. The way you start an act of maass genecide is you say the other group of people are nothing more then animals and claim that your group is somehow not. Evolution has never been disproven...Wait "To me,". Are you stating a fact or a highly inaccurate opinen. The line between adaptation and evolution is imaginary. Explain why we see natural non-hybrid speciation then.
You want me to explain natural non-hybrid speciation? Adaptation. Evolution and adaptation are not the same. My opinion or thoughts may be inaccurate to you and that's fine. It changes nothing. What truth KT45? Your truth.
No they are not inaccurate to me they are simple inaccurate. OK so you know evolution is right you just refuse to call it that. Your definition of adaptation is the definition of evolution.
Adaption is caused by natural selection and mutation in the genome. A selective pressure like insecticide kills insects. Insects that are born with mutations that make it immune to insecticide flourish and others die off. The species therefore adapts to the insecticide. Biological evolution demonstrates a change in species by means of natural selection and mutation which is why evolution and adaptation are similar
I think supermerlin100 was pointing out the fallacy you made. You said "Is anybody even aware that Darwin was a racist?" This is an ad hom fallacy. You also said "His theory was used as justification for genocide" this fallacy is called argument from final consequences. SuperMerlin was showing that pointing out the character of the person (racist) or pointing out the consquences of a theory does not make the theory false. It is irrelevant to the truth of the claim.
I accept adaptation and that's where it ends. KT45 said it "similar". Similar and the same are 2 different words with different meanings. We don't need to agree on everything. If I am wrong it wouldn't be the first time nor the last. I am willing to admit this. Are you? What's your stake in this?
Science is Real. When one talks about Evolution one talks about decent with modification that tends to adaptation to the environment. And Theories are the framework by which we describe reality.
The fact that we need water to survive is not a theory. It is observable. I am trying to give a simple example. We can observe electricity but full knowledge of it is still lacking. That is why we still say the theory of electricity because we don't fully understand it. We can observe adaptation not evolution. Evolution is a broad term. Give me an example of how the theory of evolution has improved or made the world a better place?
No, as in you didn't know that all children are to get immunization shots when they are infants?
Personally I think you should explore this topic for yourself. There are wonderful videos that talk about the benefits of understanding evolution, and what evolution has done for us. Even Applying Evolution to other things that aren't biological has benefits.
Using evolutionary algorithms on different products tends to make them Better.
You mean engineering a product to be better than the last product. Ever heard of Mennonites. Are they forced to get immunization shots? I like freedom. Do you? Or do you dream of a day when everything is forced upon you. Television programming says it all. Even the trailer park redneck. You give yourself away with that comment. Whether twisted or not it is still copper. And yes, I have watched and read materials from both supposed camps. Have you? Just wondering?
Someone should tell the Mennonites about this new plague that they have created. What's it called? Enlighten me please. I don't like people dying either. Another thing we have in common. I can admit to not knowing everything. Can you?
Even the trailer park redneck practices Evolution without realizing it when he uses a metal hanger as antenna for his TV. Constant twisting of the metal is the equivalent of mutation, whiles a clearer and clearer picture on the screen is natural selection.
And broad term is only if you are using the creationist standpoint that Evolution means everything BUT "Decent with modification" Ae, the biological definition.
Oh yes, here we go. Label anyone who disagrees as creationists. Our environment obviously affects our condition. Do you believe autism is evolution? Vaccines have nothing to do with evolution in it's full spectrum. Do you believe that receiving a vaccine makes you better or superior to someone that does not? The theory of evolution did not give us vaccines. Or do you claim Darwin invented the microscope? No vaccine for me and yet I am still alive.
My point is you don't need a vaccine every year for the flu. If we did humans would have died out. How long do you think vaccines have been around? Why must you resort to insult when someone doesn't see things as you do? And no gold star is needed, but thanks anyway. But Rockefeller might give you a gold star for spreading propaganda that fills his coffers. Peace be with you.
Its funny in a time when people lives are so dependent on a variety of technologies, from the cellphone, laptops, plasma tv's etc,etc, Yet people have such low regards for Science. The fruits of science is technology.
KT45 I found your film interesting. I have a comment which I hope you find helpful. The question 'what happened before the big bang'? Is only a meaningless question if you try to answer it in terms of the spacetime we call our universe. Leonard Susskind's Matrix Theory version of M Theory defines 'the spaceless and timeless realm' as "zero branes".
Thermodynamics doesn't explain the mass defect. I think people put too much stock in the "laws" of Thermodynamics as they are good models but by no means perfect. Anyways--atheism is just another form of belief structure. Disproving another theory does not prove your theory--it simply disproves another theory.
I really see no difference between atheism and existentialism. However: Nietzsche would be proud of your work I'm sure.
Science is not the NEW religion. It has always been THE religion. Theorist is another word for believer. There is no difference between the process of imagining a Cabali-Yau space and imagining a heaven. A theoretical physicist is pushing for the discovery of god and a theologian is preaching he's there. Neither one is sure what's on the other side of the bounds of understanding. Atheists just happen to claim "nothing" and theists happen to claim "something."
Actually theories have to make predictions. If a theory can not make a prediction or it fails to make a correct one then the theory is disproved. With beliefs, like saying there is a heaven is much different than accepting a theory like germ theory.
Oh, I wasn't trying to disprove anyones theory in this video. I was trying to correct some misconceptions a user had about evolution. If you can refer me to any sources that show that the laws of thermodynamics are not perfect I'll be glad to read them.
Thermodynamics: Read Kurt Gödel. The mass defect is also an interesting phenomena...there is some scientific slight of hand in the Binding Force theory: can you spot it?
Scientific Models: Even Hawking will tell you "All we ever know is our models, but never the reality that may or may not exist behind the models..."
Additionally: your focus is on quantum mechanics, relativity and various forms of biology but you've skirted one extremely important, fledgling, science: the science of the mind and consciousness. You can not define reality without defining its observer.
The brain and mind are explained by the quantum scale interactions between sub-atomic particles inside the atoms inside the cells that makeup the brain and the mind.
So exactly which law of thermodynamics do you think is wrong? Please send me 0.001% of your money, for you must be very rich by selling
all that energy from your perpetual motion machines. Can you even state the three laws without looking them up? Can you give at least two forms of the second law without looking it up?
Parallels. There are (3) !!! Wanna learn more about a parallel? Refer to the screen you are looking at. Windows has more than one layer.Cannot touch the 3rd layer without
Physicist Richard Feynman once said, "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."
Our brains have evolved to cope with the universe between the very small and very large scales, since that is where we live it is most useful to us as a means of survival. It comes as no surprise that quantum physics appears completely counter-intuitive to what we are used to, and is so difficult to comprehend.
After watching this video... seeing the science within I still love all the SPECULATION involved... whatever Professor A says in evolution I am sure Professor B or C or D will debunk it and propose another 'appearance' of evolution . microevlution is very true... macroevolution is so false.
thanks for your comments. I'll be sure to keep studying evolution and people who disagree with the theory of evolution and see if I come to the same conclusion as you. Thanks. Peace
Science is and always will be a wok in progress. Scientists debate over what the evidence they have found means, and this is the only way science will progress until explanations and evidence are made and found respectively that account for all the variables, and a consensus can be reached. If you criticise this process you are criticising the very same process that brought you all of your technological, medical and informational conveniences.
Guess you want to debate? Therefore, tell me what is significant about non-hybrid speciation for 'evolution'? Some part of the 'theory of Evolution' may be correct but as NOOO states its really adapation and nothing ' Darwinian' is BEING observed.
Ok, on the sidebar of KT45... biological evolution is a change in the properties of a population of organisms ' etc. As an Aristotleian I can tell you Darwinian is falsified while the Biblical account of ' within kind' is justified. It i swhat aristotle stated as a fixed genera. According to present demonstrations there is actually no 'new species' as IN a particular insect like mosquito 'becoming' a different insect BEING. What IS it still? A ' new' mosquito but only in its FIXED genera.
If your idea was right there shouldn't be any natural non-hybrid speciation. But there is. So you moved the goal post. According to the bible we are all desended from 2 people that lived 6000 years ago...Do you know what inbreeding is? Also you can't use a word like kind in science humans are a kind of ape apes are a kind of primate and so on intill eukaryotes are a kind of life form. It has no real meaning so every time we destroy it you change the definition.
' you can't use a word like kind in science humans are a kind of ape apes are a kind of primate and so on intill eukaryotes are a kind of life form.' - SuperMerlin With that, you actually just denied your own phony version of ' the theory of evolution'.
The inbreeding was permitted as the genome of ManKIND was near perfect in those times. It was in Moses time, cousins weren't allowed to mate anymore plus they had dietray laws. Kind for Man would be from 'early to modern Homo.'
Wrong, My point was that every time we disprove 1 of your "kind" arguements you change the definition. And that kind has no real definition.
That doesn't make a difference. Besides that in the most commonly told verson of the story (the bible has 2 different versons) eve is adam's female clone. Why else would god need adam's rib?
No, it actually doesn't. The second one is like an appendix to the First. It actually shows the secondary causes of some type of ' evolution' about to happen after the primary cause of Creation. The program came before evolution. You are making ' Evolution' which is a secondary cause your first primary cause...which is total nonsense. The evolution theory can be replace by the Program theory as stated by a French professor in medicine.
In 1 verson adam and eve are created at the same time and in the other adam is created first. Humans have design flaws like our retina face the wrong way and the optic nerve connects to the retina through a hole in the retina. Squid eyes don't have ether of these probles. So, there are 3 choses squid evolved the structure of their eyes in a different order then we did, random design or squid are the chosen ones.
Ok, this is probably after the Creation. Speciation come into mind? Anyhow, squids live in marine waters, mainly in the abyss, so there are eyes would have been created differently and from there their own speciation after the order of generaton ' to increase and multiply.' Yeah, Supermerlin, thanks for being respectful like KT45 . All the best.
No, all primates have the design flaws I told you about. Evolution explains why they are still there, because at this point without genetic engineering they would be just about impossible to get rid of. But for the same reason if a orginism had them the right way would be just about impossible for them to end up the wrong way.
BTW Cephalopods (squid and octopus) have not and are always deep sea creatures. They dominanted the world's oceans in the Paleozoic and Mesozoic.
@SuperMerlin100 - " By the way our retinas face the wrong way." No, blame it on 'evolution' ? My eyesight was/is quite fine. One can state after the Fall our 'natural eyes' became what it is? As Adam and Eve were composed of both body and spirit, they could see angels as well as glimpses of GOD. Once they sinned the rest of us born in the Order of Generation are in conflict with the elements we were to master instead of 'the other way around' (eyes).
@Aresthanas We can use the sry (a part of the Y chromosome) to trace back every human male strictly through the male line to the last male line common ancestor of all humans. And we come up with the date 60000 years ago.
Noah the supposed last male line common ancestor is suppose to have lived only 4000 years ago.
@SuperMerlin100 - " Noah the supposed last male line common ancestor..." No Noah is not the last. He is descendent from Adam which means the first Man is our last ancestor.
Why just a part (sry) of the Y chromosome anyways? How did they calculate the erroneous 60000yrs when Homo is supposedly 2 million mythical years ago?
That 'date' is when ' Homo sapiens ' was sapiens (wise)? Yes, early Homo was around with other Homos who 'bottlenecked' into the Ark.
Again non-hybrid speciation is 'against Creation or your Darwinian phony version of ' evolution' ?
For example, the domestic cat, African wildcat as well as the European wildcat may be considered variant population of the 'same species' making such crosses of offspring non-hybrids. Therefore, Adam and EVe are of the 'same species' as the Genus Homo dictates so they CAN produce natural non-hybrids offspring as well as those in the Order of Generaton from them.
Hey guess what Darwin was on his death bed and his last words were dealing with the following to make a long story short he accepted god idiot so shut the hell up and go fuck a cow he was a damn hypocrite
then by your logic, I should not believe in evolution because my parents are creationists, and they tried to brainwash me into believing in creationism. My school tries to brainwash me and my classmates to believe in creationism, but I am 100% convinced that macro evolution and universal common ancestry is in fact true.
close your still need to grasp more of black holes in relation to the singularity. as to the religious aspect thing of "god" as a computer programmer and the universe as an automated system on a loop
That is an awesome video for that game! Anyone here Halo Fans? I bet most of you are. I'm getting my copy of Halo 3 for free at halo3.wantsDOTit(replace DOT with .) I also get a free xbox 360 elite system.
Everyone better go get there copy for free too at:
This was taken into account before the experiment was done. To avoid an exchange in electrons between the two plates, the two plates were placed in contact with one another making their charge neutral. I don't know if their was some other kind of energy but it wasn't electrical
If quantum physics, and this experiment are correct then a true vacuum (completely empty) cannot exist because virtual partiles to arise. Would the weight of the atmosphere crush the container? Well most containers in the physics labs I've been to have plastics strong enough to resist collapse.
Don't take my word for it though. I could be wrong. So if you are interested please take the time to research the Casimir Effect when you can. If you find I'm wrong please correct me!
You mind me alot of my friend Malik. A ton of knowing references and quick talking interspersed with personal views and soft jabs disguised as 'advice' to your opponent.
But none of this changes the fact that you still don't completely know what you're talking about. My advice to you, is to learn just a little more before you spout your barrages of references. It would help us SO much.
Actually I knew all the information I presented. I just wanted to cite my sources so that you know where they come from. The end of my video I spoke freely without references at all when I talked about what I believed (that the universe didn't come from nothing). If you don't believe me please type anything I said after speaking of the Casimir effect on google and find where I was just citing references. But yes, I am planning to study more. Peace.
My favorite part is at approx. 5:30 - 5:45 when you discuss the undefined concept of time at the moment of the singularity. Unfortunately, this is WAY OVER the heads of both snow and the legions of robotic passage reciting Muslims. Excellent effort though. My guess is there will be no reply or something nonsensical.
I know how the univers was created from nothing ...
0=-1+1 where +1 is our univers and -1 is a paralel but the negative of our univers...In the begining they were together but after a time they separeted... That's my theory but don't think im Serious ... HAVE A NICE DAY...
is there really such a thing as absolute zero within any system in nature? or is the concept of 0 merely an abstraction? in other words isn't to say that there was "nothing" to say "no such thing." isn't to describe nothing as existing kind of begging the question in the first place? physics usually translates it's mass into energy within me in the form of a headache, lol. by the very nature of the concept, nothing cannot "be" as being denotes existence.
i oppose evolution from a scientific and logical stance...theology doesnt really come into it...this is the logical way to go about it...while the atheist preachers believe in evolution like a religion due to emotion and they are blinded b there emotion and cannot see the glaring holes in evolution...that said, atheistic evolution is a complete and utter nonesense...if an atheist believes in evoluton then it is akin to believing in the flying jelly monster, pink unicorn etc...i hope to elaborate
Then snow, please present your arguments before making such claims. I told you in my vid that evolution is just a transistion between species. I don't think I have a faith. With faith you don't question your beliefs. I test my beliefs and challenge them and try to disprove them. So far my stance is strong.
hi kt45...i am snow and look forward to responding soon:)
i hope i can answer our points...i hope to explain further that atheism is illogical soon...i must say this...evolution reaffirms God and just shows atheism to be more illogical...i hope to respond...peace
So you say you believe in evolution (variations between species)? The Quran shows that humans didn't come from previous lifeforms so you can't believe in it. You must disprove evolution or the quran is wrong.
...i will try to watch your vid again when i can hear it better...inshaallah and respond...peace...please do not reject my response or block it like alot of atheists do
I noticed that snow ignored a video response by a user called Gnophilist who also logically explained how something can come from nothing. He then continued to say that atheist are illogical. I'll give him the benefit of a doubt and guess he never saw it. I emailed him this vid so he should respond.
What do I say? What DO I say? Somebody's brain just caught FIRE! I have a tendancy to read something and say to myself, "Okay, that's THAT question answered" and then move on without necessarily recalling what exactly settled the issue for me. Thx for reminding me of the Casimir effect and gravity's negative potential energy. Something from nothing? It IS possible, demonstrably so. 5++
wow... U are brilliant, oh... and now I feel really stupid... I have been waisting my life. My brain only contains trivia from movies and TV, but look at U... impressive... most impressive...
Light isn't as fast as they say...1 + 1= 3.. because you must count the light matter and the dark matter...the light is the 1 the dark is the plus in between just because you can't see doesn't mean it's not there energy cannot be destroyed only transferred.
GhettoStarr23 1 year ago
Everything is born out of the darkness, even light. I believe Einstein was wrong to say light is the fast moving...really is the the dark matter aka the god particle that the mainstream scientist are scared of. In space there are black holes that light cannot ecape from...so obvoi
GhettoStarr23 1 year ago
Information only arises from a mind. Matter does not add infomration to the genome.
Language only arises from thought / MIND. Language never "evolves" without a mind.
There's no such thing as mutations creating information. PROOF: Try creating information with an online Random Mutations Generator. Mutations destroy information. Again, information arises from a mind.
Mr88playmaker 1 year ago
People who are taught Evolution aren't stopping to notice that there is NO evidence given for what they are being taught.
Check this out: Evolution VIDEO (DISCOVERY Channel educational series): Asserts that fish turned into dinosaurs, and dinosaurs turned into people. This is the FOUNDATION for Evolution. It is based on ZERO science.
watch?v=5W763lQR0tU
Re: our so called "origins" check this out. It is taught in all the school books: Monkeys turning into people!
watch?v=OjprkQbOouQ
Mr88playmaker 2 years ago
Go to a science website. Or just google evidence for evolution.
Amphibians evolved from lung fish.
ZReptiles evolved from and clade of amphibians that spent more time on land then in the water.
No scientist says that we evolved from dinosaurs. Our last common ancestor with them lived 300 million years ago.
The first dinosaurs lived 250 million years ago.
Learn something about evolution before you attack the most strongly backed scietific theory we have.
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
(A) Information is: the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence.
(B) Information exist independent of its medium. (knowledge or intel can be communicated verbally, written on paper, typed on a computer etc.)
(C) Code = Language. Language originates in a MIND.
There ore only two types of language known to man: (1) That of human mind origin (2) DNA code.
Information is not matter or energy.
Language is not matter or energy.
Mr88playmaker 2 years ago
@Mr88playmaker 1) knowledge is a form of imformation.
2) Intelligence is the processing of imformation.
Note: your (B) contradicts the definition you gave in (A).
Get a encyclopedia. The rules governing God's thoughts are a code who designed them?
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
Modern Science has killed Darwin:
DNA reveals that biological life forms are NOT purely materialistic, self-assembled products of chance; but rather the creative and purposeful product of INFORMATION and LANGUAGE (a MIND).
Evolutionists have a HUGE problem.
DNA code is information!
Information is: The communication or reception of KNOWLEDGE or INTELLIGENCE.
Mr88playmaker 2 years ago
First natural selection is the antitheist of random chance.
Once again look this stuff up before you spam.
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
@Mr88playmaker Strange how every mind we have ever come across is the product of a materialistic brain.
Once again get a encyclopedia or dictionary. Your definition for evolution is interally inconsistent.
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
@SuperMerlin100 said (QUOTE): "Strange how every mind we have ever come across is the product of a materialistic brain." (END QUOTE)
Wrong.
All the activity in the brain is called "REACTIONS." The brain works with electrical impulses / neurons. What's awesome about the brain is that all observable activity (of neurons in action) do not 'cause' thought, but it's the other way around. The activity of the brain is a result of, & and reaction to, what the MIND is doing. The mind drives the brain.
Mr88playmaker 1 year ago
@Mr88playmaker - " The activity of the brain is a result of, & and reaction to, what the MIND is doing.."
Correct. Dr. Erich Christian,an engineer in the field of Communication, explains it quite well in line with you.
Intelligence reduces TIME needed so that once Man took months or days to travel we can now do it WITHIN a DAY. GOD will be justified. Your studies are NOT going for nothing... but as for the rest..." Remembrance of them will be forgotten."
Aresthanas 1 year ago
The very use of the word "Evolution" is always applied to those things that evolve via intelligent means (such as evolution of a company or a screenplay etc). The ONLY time the word "evolution" is applied to mean the OPPOSITE is by Darwinists in connection to biological evolution i.e.; one genus (kind) evolving into another genus (kind) without ANY evidence as to how or why.
Mr88playmaker 2 years ago
@Mr88playmaker There is a great video by cdk007 called MicroEvolution vs MacroEvolution. In this video, gives a few examples speciation. Also a video by DonExodus2 called "How Evolution Works 7: Speciation" will give more examples. Have a great day.
KT45 2 years ago
@Mr88playmaker How and why evolution works is in the definition of the term. Go to wikipedia.
While you are there look up evidence for evolution. At this point you have to actually be trying to avoid the evidence.
Only general relativity and the standard model have the same level of evidence.
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
@Mr88playmaker
This is objectively false. Evolution, by any definition, is simply change and never, in any context implies and intelligent agency of any kind. Neither does it imply a lack thereof. It makes no implication on the instigator of the change at all. However, when evolution is mentioned without specified context, it is generally accepted as a reference to biological evolution, which only by incident, already has an accepted explanation that doesn't require intelligent intervention.
psychosavant 1 year ago
In the foundational document for Evolution theory itself, called: "Origin Of The Species By Means Of natural Selection / Preservation Of Favoured Races In The Struggle For Life", Darwin asserts that black people are the closest relatives to apes and that white people are at the top of the beast-into-man "genus to genus" evolutionary ladder. According to Darwin, mankind has achieved various levels of evolution culminating in the white man's civilization.
Mr88playmaker 2 years ago
@Mr88playmaker in the origin of the speicies, evolution is described metaphorically as a tree, not a ladder. With a ladder one species is over the other to show dominance. However with a tree species branch off from each other showing that each branch continues to improve and evolve. No living species is superior to any other living species in this model. Only extinct species are found at the bottom of this tree of life.
KT45 2 years ago
@Mr88playmaker So your best "arguement" is an ad homiem?
There is no "ladder" as far as evo is conserned there is only the dead and the living.
All humans are apes.
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
@Mr88playmaker
Ironically enough, your argument is a genetic fallacy. Not to mention you present a clear fallacy commonly known as poisoning the well. What Darwin believed has nothing to do with the accuracy of the modern scientific understanding of biological evolution. Whether or not your claim is accurate is irrelevant.
psychosavant 1 year ago
the casimir force. there is two possible explenations for this force. one
the force is created by electric gravity in a vacuum contracting the plates together
by an equal oriention in the field. the second possibility is that electromangetic waves passes trough the plates at a distance between them where some of them get trough the gap but the rest of them are kept apart, this can cause a differential
in force by a differetial in waves acting between and against the plates
coldarc 1 year ago
there is no violation of energy conservation. energy cannot be created.
a big bang violate this law. there is no need for virtual particles to exist.
there is always a kind of electromagnetic waves that interact in a way that
can make up particles. particles can only exist if their energy is conserved
at the same time beeing feeded with energy in forms of these waves.
coldarc 1 year ago
i´m an atheist
evolution is about what genes are selected to fit small enviromental changes.
the dna is not in conflict with religion since it cannot be proven that genes
can come from nothing, og be created by functions ruled by genes that wasn´t
already there. transitions take a long time since the variations are so small in each generations. for all we know the dna might be the fingerprints of GOD
coldarc 1 year ago
bullshit is also evolutional..thats when religious people have come a long way and get some education and than use that education for producing scienific proof of their god.
that concludes..they ve learned nothing,!!
robot014 2 years ago
I kind of like the vacuum fluctuation idea.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
I wish i could grow a beard.
Sivadomagyar 3 years ago
me too. i'm a girl.
1moreAtheist 2 years ago
You axed him a good question
ponyman13 3 years ago
Question? If an insecticide that worked for years on certain bugs stops working is that evolution. Or is it adaptation. I've just noticed that the word evolution is thrown around a lot these days and adapting has disappeared. Is anybody even aware that Darwin was a racist? Does anybody know the full name of his book?
neworderoldorder 3 years ago
It doesn't matter if Darwin was racist or not neworderoldorder. Isic Newton was an jerk but we believe in gravity. Evil people believe in gravity. Is that a reason to not believe in it ourselfs. No, it isn't!
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
I didn't say he was evil SuperMerlin 100. His theory was used as justification for genocide. Survival of the fittest mentality. Gravity or force of gravity is self evident. Simple observation. Evolution is an old idea. As old as the greek civilization. Not new but old. Believe what you will. To me, evolution has already been shown to be wrong. Adaptation however is self evident.
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
No it wasn't. The way you start an act of maass genecide is you say the other group of people are nothing more then animals and claim that your group is somehow not. Evolution has never been disproven...Wait "To me,". Are you stating a fact or a highly inaccurate opinen. The line between adaptation and evolution is imaginary. Explain why we see natural non-hybrid speciation then.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
You want me to explain natural non-hybrid speciation? Adaptation. Evolution and adaptation are not the same. My opinion or thoughts may be inaccurate to you and that's fine. It changes nothing. What truth KT45? Your truth.
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
No they are not inaccurate to me they are simple inaccurate. OK so you know evolution is right you just refuse to call it that. Your definition of adaptation is the definition of evolution.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
Adaption is caused by natural selection and mutation in the genome. A selective pressure like insecticide kills insects. Insects that are born with mutations that make it immune to insecticide flourish and others die off. The species therefore adapts to the insecticide. Biological evolution demonstrates a change in species by means of natural selection and mutation which is why evolution and adaptation are similar
KT45 2 years ago
I think supermerlin100 was pointing out the fallacy you made. You said "Is anybody even aware that Darwin was a racist?" This is an ad hom fallacy. You also said "His theory was used as justification for genocide" this fallacy is called argument from final consequences. SuperMerlin was showing that pointing out the character of the person (racist) or pointing out the consquences of a theory does not make the theory false. It is irrelevant to the truth of the claim.
KT45 2 years ago
Thank you KT45.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
Adaptation is part of Evolution. By accepting it, you accept Evolution.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
I accept adaptation and that's where it ends. KT45 said it "similar". Similar and the same are 2 different words with different meanings. We don't need to agree on everything. If I am wrong it wouldn't be the first time nor the last. I am willing to admit this. Are you? What's your stake in this?
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
Science is Real. When one talks about Evolution one talks about decent with modification that tends to adaptation to the environment. And Theories are the framework by which we describe reality.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
The fact that we need water to survive is not a theory. It is observable. I am trying to give a simple example. We can observe electricity but full knowledge of it is still lacking. That is why we still say the theory of electricity because we don't fully understand it. We can observe adaptation not evolution. Evolution is a broad term. Give me an example of how the theory of evolution has improved or made the world a better place?
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
You ever get a vaccine?
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
No.
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
No, as in you didn't know that all children are to get immunization shots when they are infants?
Personally I think you should explore this topic for yourself. There are wonderful videos that talk about the benefits of understanding evolution, and what evolution has done for us. Even Applying Evolution to other things that aren't biological has benefits.
Using evolutionary algorithms on different products tends to make them Better.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
You mean engineering a product to be better than the last product. Ever heard of Mennonites. Are they forced to get immunization shots? I like freedom. Do you? Or do you dream of a day when everything is forced upon you. Television programming says it all. Even the trailer park redneck. You give yourself away with that comment. Whether twisted or not it is still copper. And yes, I have watched and read materials from both supposed camps. Have you? Just wondering?
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
I don't like people dying. And the Mennonites were become a breeding ground for a new plague.
And yes. Yes I have. I have also educated myself on what Logical Fallacies are.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Someone should tell the Mennonites about this new plague that they have created. What's it called? Enlighten me please. I don't like people dying either. Another thing we have in common. I can admit to not knowing everything. Can you?
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
Yes. Yes I can. But guess what? I don't stop there. I ask questions about why and how.
Guess what you have, seeing as you brought up the topic of the Mennonites and them being given vaccines,
The Internet. Cause I am sure it was Polio, but I could be mistaken.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Another thing we both like to do. Ask questions. Asking questions is great.
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
I question your questions. I question what you believe and why you believe it. I question what I believe and why I believe it.
And I come to answers about those things.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Even the trailer park redneck practices Evolution without realizing it when he uses a metal hanger as antenna for his TV. Constant twisting of the metal is the equivalent of mutation, whiles a clearer and clearer picture on the screen is natural selection.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
And broad term is only if you are using the creationist standpoint that Evolution means everything BUT "Decent with modification" Ae, the biological definition.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Oh yes, here we go. Label anyone who disagrees as creationists. Our environment obviously affects our condition. Do you believe autism is evolution? Vaccines have nothing to do with evolution in it's full spectrum. Do you believe that receiving a vaccine makes you better or superior to someone that does not? The theory of evolution did not give us vaccines. Or do you claim Darwin invented the microscope? No vaccine for me and yet I am still alive.
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
Yup. Genes mutate. Not always are the mutations beinfitual.
In the concept of the "intelligent designer" you would have to accept that your "intelligent designer" wanted them to be that way.
Superiority has nothing to do with getting a vaccine or not.
Why do you think that every year we need a new vaccine for a different flu virus? That's evolution happening.
I never claimed that. Nor do I think that. You really need to get some glasses.
Good for you. Do you want a gold star or something?
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
My point is you don't need a vaccine every year for the flu. If we did humans would have died out. How long do you think vaccines have been around? Why must you resort to insult when someone doesn't see things as you do? And no gold star is needed, but thanks anyway. But Rockefeller might give you a gold star for spreading propaganda that fills his coffers. Peace be with you.
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
Yawn.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Sorry, I didn't mean to bore you.
neworderoldorder 2 years ago
snow did not evolve, its alawys been that way since it was created. cold air & water.
xURBANxASSASSINx 3 years ago
would you totally sue me if i wrote all that in my exam? 0 =]
BethInBlack0 3 years ago
Its funny in a time when people lives are so dependent on a variety of technologies, from the cellphone, laptops, plasma tv's etc,etc, Yet people have such low regards for Science. The fruits of science is technology.
JALUVRAS363 3 years ago
science and rational dont exist. u fake muslim.
yazsher 4 years ago
KT45 I found your film interesting. I have a comment which I hope you find helpful. The question 'what happened before the big bang'? Is only a meaningless question if you try to answer it in terms of the spacetime we call our universe. Leonard Susskind's Matrix Theory version of M Theory defines 'the spaceless and timeless realm' as "zero branes".
medoubt2 4 years ago
Thermodynamics doesn't explain the mass defect. I think people put too much stock in the "laws" of Thermodynamics as they are good models but by no means perfect. Anyways--atheism is just another form of belief structure. Disproving another theory does not prove your theory--it simply disproves another theory.
I really see no difference between atheism and existentialism. However: Nietzsche would be proud of your work I'm sure.
TurboLoveTrain 4 years ago
Science is not the NEW religion. It has always been THE religion. Theorist is another word for believer. There is no difference between the process of imagining a Cabali-Yau space and imagining a heaven. A theoretical physicist is pushing for the discovery of god and a theologian is preaching he's there. Neither one is sure what's on the other side of the bounds of understanding. Atheists just happen to claim "nothing" and theists happen to claim "something."
TurboLoveTrain 4 years ago
The old religions are dogmatic hangovers for small minds. The truth in them has been long lost.
TurboLoveTrain 4 years ago
Actually theories have to make predictions. If a theory can not make a prediction or it fails to make a correct one then the theory is disproved. With beliefs, like saying there is a heaven is much different than accepting a theory like germ theory.
KT45 4 years ago
Oh, I wasn't trying to disprove anyones theory in this video. I was trying to correct some misconceptions a user had about evolution. If you can refer me to any sources that show that the laws of thermodynamics are not perfect I'll be glad to read them.
KT45 4 years ago
Thermodynamics: Read Kurt Gödel. The mass defect is also an interesting phenomena...there is some scientific slight of hand in the Binding Force theory: can you spot it?
Scientific Models: Even Hawking will tell you "All we ever know is our models, but never the reality that may or may not exist behind the models..."
TurboLoveTrain 4 years ago
Additionally: your focus is on quantum mechanics, relativity and various forms of biology but you've skirted one extremely important, fledgling, science: the science of the mind and consciousness. You can not define reality without defining its observer.
TurboLoveTrain 4 years ago
The brain and mind are explained by the quantum scale interactions between sub-atomic particles inside the atoms inside the cells that makeup the brain and the mind.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
So exactly which law of thermodynamics do you think is wrong? Please send me 0.001% of your money, for you must be very rich by selling
all that energy from your perpetual motion machines. Can you even state the three laws without looking them up? Can you give at least two forms of the second law without looking it up?
farvision 4 years ago
Parallels. There are (3) !!! Wanna learn more about a parallel? Refer to the screen you are looking at. Windows has more than one layer.Cannot touch the 3rd layer without
a (creator). Have a nice day!
192east192 4 years ago
You too. Have a great day!
KT45 4 years ago
Physicist Richard Feynman once said, "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."
Our brains have evolved to cope with the universe between the very small and very large scales, since that is where we live it is most useful to us as a means of survival. It comes as no surprise that quantum physics appears completely counter-intuitive to what we are used to, and is so difficult to comprehend.
BulletMagnetOWI 4 years ago
After watching this video... seeing the science within I still love all the SPECULATION involved... whatever Professor A says in evolution I am sure Professor B or C or D will debunk it and propose another 'appearance' of evolution . microevlution is very true... macroevolution is so false.
Aresthanas 4 years ago
thanks for your comments. I'll be sure to keep studying evolution and people who disagree with the theory of evolution and see if I come to the same conclusion as you. Thanks. Peace
KT45 4 years ago
Hello KT45... if your an evolutionist I must state your a good one as you are not crass or arrogant as others are out here . Peace to you too.
Aresthanas 4 years ago
I've seen arrogance from both sides of the fence.
KT45 4 years ago
Science is and always will be a wok in progress. Scientists debate over what the evidence they have found means, and this is the only way science will progress until explanations and evidence are made and found respectively that account for all the variables, and a consensus can be reached. If you criticise this process you are criticising the very same process that brought you all of your technological, medical and informational conveniences.
BulletMagnetOWI 4 years ago
Explain why we see speciation then.
The line between microevolution and macroevolution is imaginary.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
Explain why we see non-hybrid speciation then. Most scientist accept evolution. Heck, most christians accept it at this point. Where have you been?
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
Guess you want to debate? Therefore, tell me what is significant about non-hybrid speciation for 'evolution'? Some part of the 'theory of Evolution' may be correct but as NOOO states its really adapation and nothing ' Darwinian' is BEING observed.
Aresthanas 2 years ago
Speciation is when a new specie is formed. Non-hybride means it wasn't a hybride. So we have seen specie evolve frome other specie.
What's the difference between evolution and adapation?
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
Ok, on the sidebar of KT45... biological evolution is a change in the properties of a population of organisms ' etc. As an Aristotleian I can tell you Darwinian is falsified while the Biblical account of ' within kind' is justified. It i swhat aristotle stated as a fixed genera. According to present demonstrations there is actually no 'new species' as IN a particular insect like mosquito 'becoming' a different insect BEING. What IS it still? A ' new' mosquito but only in its FIXED genera.
Aresthanas 2 years ago
If your idea was right there shouldn't be any natural non-hybrid speciation. But there is. So you moved the goal post. According to the bible we are all desended from 2 people that lived 6000 years ago...Do you know what inbreeding is? Also you can't use a word like kind in science humans are a kind of ape apes are a kind of primate and so on intill eukaryotes are a kind of life form. It has no real meaning so every time we destroy it you change the definition.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
' you can't use a word like kind in science humans are a kind of ape apes are a kind of primate and so on intill eukaryotes are a kind of life form.' - SuperMerlin With that, you actually just denied your own phony version of ' the theory of evolution'.
The inbreeding was permitted as the genome of ManKIND was near perfect in those times. It was in Moses time, cousins weren't allowed to mate anymore plus they had dietray laws. Kind for Man would be from 'early to modern Homo.'
Aresthanas 2 years ago
Wrong, My point was that every time we disprove 1 of your "kind" arguements you change the definition. And that kind has no real definition.
That doesn't make a difference. Besides that in the most commonly told verson of the story (the bible has 2 different versons) eve is adam's female clone. Why else would god need adam's rib?
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
' the bible has 2 different versons'...
No, it actually doesn't. The second one is like an appendix to the First. It actually shows the secondary causes of some type of ' evolution' about to happen after the primary cause of Creation. The program came before evolution. You are making ' Evolution' which is a secondary cause your first primary cause...which is total nonsense. The evolution theory can be replace by the Program theory as stated by a French professor in medicine.
Aresthanas 2 years ago
In 1 verson adam and eve are created at the same time and in the other adam is created first. Humans have design flaws like our retina face the wrong way and the optic nerve connects to the retina through a hole in the retina. Squid eyes don't have ether of these probles. So, there are 3 choses squid evolved the structure of their eyes in a different order then we did, random design or squid are the chosen ones.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
' Humans have design flaws '
Ok, this is probably after the Creation. Speciation come into mind? Anyhow, squids live in marine waters, mainly in the abyss, so there are eyes would have been created differently and from there their own speciation after the order of generaton ' to increase and multiply.' Yeah, Supermerlin, thanks for being respectful like KT45 . All the best.
Aresthanas 2 years ago
No, all primates have the design flaws I told you about. Evolution explains why they are still there, because at this point without genetic engineering they would be just about impossible to get rid of. But for the same reason if a orginism had them the right way would be just about impossible for them to end up the wrong way.
BTW Cephalopods (squid and octopus) have not and are always deep sea creatures. They dominanted the world's oceans in the Paleozoic and Mesozoic.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
The reason our eyes have these problems is that the different parts didn't evolve in the right order.
And now there's no way to fix it.
If the eyes started out correctly they wouldn't have these flaws now.
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
@Aresthanas I explaned how they aren't consistent. give a counter arguement that doesn't contradict your religion.
The programer needs an explanation for its unestablished existence.
By the way our retinas face the wrong way. That's one crapy programer.
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
@SuperMerlin100 - " By the way our retinas face the wrong way." No, blame it on 'evolution' ? My eyesight was/is quite fine. One can state after the Fall our 'natural eyes' became what it is? As Adam and Eve were composed of both body and spirit, they could see angels as well as glimpses of GOD. Once they sinned the rest of us born in the Order of Generation are in conflict with the elements we were to master instead of 'the other way around' (eyes).
Aresthanas 1 year ago
@Aresthanas The cells that actually detect light are behind all of the other cells in the retina.
And all of the wiring is in front of them. if a human designed a camera like that they would be fired on the spot. God should be better then that.
Actually saying god designed an eye so flawed is AN INSULT TO GOD.
I could give you a list of other flaws (that don't fit into metaphors so well).
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
@Aresthanas We can use the sry (a part of the Y chromosome) to trace back every human male strictly through the male line to the last male line common ancestor of all humans. And we come up with the date 60000 years ago.
Noah the supposed last male line common ancestor is suppose to have lived only 4000 years ago.
SuperMerlin100 1 year ago
@SuperMerlin100 - " Noah the supposed last male line common ancestor..." No Noah is not the last. He is descendent from Adam which means the first Man is our last ancestor.
Why just a part (sry) of the Y chromosome anyways? How did they calculate the erroneous 60000yrs when Homo is supposedly 2 million mythical years ago?
That 'date' is when ' Homo sapiens ' was sapiens (wise)? Yes, early Homo was around with other Homos who 'bottlenecked' into the Ark.
Aresthanas 1 year ago
Again non-hybrid speciation is 'against Creation or your Darwinian phony version of ' evolution' ?
For example, the domestic cat, African wildcat as well as the European wildcat may be considered variant population of the 'same species' making such crosses of offspring non-hybrids. Therefore, Adam and EVe are of the 'same species' as the Genus Homo dictates so they CAN produce natural non-hybrids offspring as well as those in the Order of Generaton from them.
Aresthanas 2 years ago
Hey guess what Darwin was on his death bed and his last words were dealing with the following to make a long story short he accepted god idiot so shut the hell up and go fuck a cow he was a damn hypocrite
germanleader13 4 years ago
thanks for the comments. peace!
KT45 4 years ago
1st proof please. 2nd gross. 3rd you can accept evolution and believe in god at the sametime. 4th attack Darwins charactor is pointless.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
your the man keep up the cool videos
IllegalAlien1 4 years ago
Evolution is fake why?
You have been brainwashed whit it sinds youre child hood.
Look search for 'forbidden archeology' see what they dont want you to know.
samsun1975 4 years ago
then by your logic, I should not believe in evolution because my parents are creationists, and they tried to brainwash me into believing in creationism. My school tries to brainwash me and my classmates to believe in creationism, but I am 100% convinced that macro evolution and universal common ancestry is in fact true.
migkillertwo 4 years ago
close your still need to grasp more of black holes in relation to the singularity. as to the religious aspect thing of "god" as a computer programmer and the universe as an automated system on a loop
deathtaco69 4 years ago
That is an awesome video for that game! Anyone here Halo Fans? I bet most of you are. I'm getting my copy of Halo 3 for free at halo3.wantsDOTit(replace DOT with .) I also get a free xbox 360 elite system.
Everyone better go get there copy for free too at:
halo3.wantsDOTit(replace DOT with .)
JoshuaGross6123 4 years ago
Nonsense. Occult superstitious blather.
NotSoOldHippy 4 years ago
hmm it seems like to me in that experiment there were 2 giant slabs of matter. mabe the energy came from the matter perhaps?
automaticAEV 4 years ago
This was taken into account before the experiment was done. To avoid an exchange in electrons between the two plates, the two plates were placed in contact with one another making their charge neutral. I don't know if their was some other kind of energy but it wasn't electrical
KT45 4 years ago
im still confused if you made a true vaccume. wouldnt the weight of the atmosphere crush the container?
automaticAEV 4 years ago
If quantum physics, and this experiment are correct then a true vacuum (completely empty) cannot exist because virtual partiles to arise. Would the weight of the atmosphere crush the container? Well most containers in the physics labs I've been to have plastics strong enough to resist collapse.
KT45 4 years ago
Don't take my word for it though. I could be wrong. So if you are interested please take the time to research the Casimir Effect when you can. If you find I'm wrong please correct me!
KT45 4 years ago
Not only are you smart, you are calm and clear, two things that I wish I were. Anyway: You've earned yourself another subscriber :D
Tiwaking 4 years ago
... i only understood about 3/4 of that but i found it very interesting.
kevin4882 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
<b> World's largest sex and swinger personals with over
20,000,000 members looking to hook up with someone just like you!
Enter [_SexDating4Free.com_] to Join for FREE
</b>
gribnikFrematory 4 years ago
They were fascinating visual aids. Is there a place for laymen to learn more?
MisterMolecule 4 years ago
talkorigins is a good website to start. If you want to read a book another good layman book is "A Short History of Nearly Everything" by Bill Bryson
KT45 4 years ago
You mind me alot of my friend Malik. A ton of knowing references and quick talking interspersed with personal views and soft jabs disguised as 'advice' to your opponent.
But none of this changes the fact that you still don't completely know what you're talking about. My advice to you, is to learn just a little more before you spout your barrages of references. It would help us SO much.
Djomigod 4 years ago
Actually I knew all the information I presented. I just wanted to cite my sources so that you know where they come from. The end of my video I spoke freely without references at all when I talked about what I believed (that the universe didn't come from nothing). If you don't believe me please type anything I said after speaking of the Casimir effect on google and find where I was just citing references. But yes, I am planning to study more. Peace.
KT45 4 years ago
My favorite part is at approx. 5:30 - 5:45 when you discuss the undefined concept of time at the moment of the singularity. Unfortunately, this is WAY OVER the heads of both snow and the legions of robotic passage reciting Muslims. Excellent effort though. My guess is there will be no reply or something nonsensical.
TheOracle2007 4 years ago
You know Malik from yugioh.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
Bravo!
sefuedecabron 4 years ago
Darwanism --> Probabilitics Evolution: Destroyed.
w w w . mayanmajix . com / art3112 . html
DeedatRocks 4 years ago
Sweet. Best use of "ontogeny" in any video I've seen so far...
abbnormalfunctions 4 years ago
I know how the univers was created from nothing ...
0=-1+1 where +1 is our univers and -1 is a paralel but the negative of our univers...In the begining they were together but after a time they separeted... That's my theory but don't think im Serious ... HAVE A NICE DAY...
Pityugonzales 4 years ago
is there really such a thing as absolute zero within any system in nature? or is the concept of 0 merely an abstraction? in other words isn't to say that there was "nothing" to say "no such thing." isn't to describe nothing as existing kind of begging the question in the first place? physics usually translates it's mass into energy within me in the form of a headache, lol. by the very nature of the concept, nothing cannot "be" as being denotes existence.
ahamagi 4 years ago
great video!!
CapeandCowl 4 years ago
i oppose evolution from a scientific and logical stance...theology doesnt really come into it...this is the logical way to go about it...while the atheist preachers believe in evolution like a religion due to emotion and they are blinded b there emotion and cannot see the glaring holes in evolution...that said, atheistic evolution is a complete and utter nonesense...if an atheist believes in evoluton then it is akin to believing in the flying jelly monster, pink unicorn etc...i hope to elaborate
DamascusMinaret 4 years ago
Then snow, please present your arguments before making such claims. I told you in my vid that evolution is just a transistion between species. I don't think I have a faith. With faith you don't question your beliefs. I test my beliefs and challenge them and try to disprove them. So far my stance is strong.
KT45 4 years ago
I am open to learn.
KT45 4 years ago
Christians accept evolution to.
SuperMerlin100 2 years ago
hi kt45...i am snow and look forward to responding soon:)
i hope i can answer our points...i hope to explain further that atheism is illogical soon...i must say this...evolution reaffirms God and just shows atheism to be more illogical...i hope to respond...peace
DamascusMinaret 4 years ago
So you say you believe in evolution (variations between species)? The Quran shows that humans didn't come from previous lifeforms so you can't believe in it. You must disprove evolution or the quran is wrong.
KT45 4 years ago
kt45...i know what the quran says...the quran is not arguing against evolution...i will elaborate in my video:)
DamascusMinaret 4 years ago
...i will try to watch your vid again when i can hear it better...inshaallah and respond...peace...please do not reject my response or block it like alot of atheists do
DamascusMinaret 4 years ago
Will do.
KT45 4 years ago
Name the ones who have, and had they blocked you beforehand?
kamenoko25 4 years ago
Users who block people simply cant handle the arguments of the posters. Like you Kamen.
Dasllama01 4 years ago
I made a video specifically detailing why I block users. See if you can find it.
Also, the shortened version of my name is kame. Kamen means mask.
kamenoko25 4 years ago
I could really care less. I just wanted to tell you you are a pussy for blocking me.
Dasllama01 4 years ago
I bet snow won't touch this one. (and if he does, it will be hilarious.)
dragon2wolf 4 years ago
I noticed that snow ignored a video response by a user called Gnophilist who also logically explained how something can come from nothing. He then continued to say that atheist are illogical. I'll give him the benefit of a doubt and guess he never saw it. I emailed him this vid so he should respond.
KT45 4 years ago
Good way to confirm that he has seen it. I eagerly await his response. (If it comes)
dragon2wolf 4 years ago
I must say these are some of the best thoughtout videos on youtube. Thank you.
RosieDesire 4 years ago
Excellent video!!!
You reminded me how incredibly fascinating science can be. It's so much more interesting then religious dogma.
earthseeker 4 years ago
Awesome! keep the videos coming.
GunMouth4hire 4 years ago
nicely said, intresting to see how Snow responds
TrueNorth15 4 years ago
I would love to see snow even try to make a response to this vid!
worldlystone 4 years ago
You should have called this "Schooling Snow on Evolution and the Big Bang".
Meloco2007 4 years ago
Heck, I feel schooled on Evolution and the Big Bang.
DayfallKat 4 years ago
Holy Hell that was awsome!
dragon2wolf 4 years ago
What do I say? What DO I say? Somebody's brain just caught FIRE! I have a tendancy to read something and say to myself, "Okay, that's THAT question answered" and then move on without necessarily recalling what exactly settled the issue for me. Thx for reminding me of the Casimir effect and gravity's negative potential energy. Something from nothing? It IS possible, demonstrably so. 5++
philhellenes 4 years ago
Sublime
ltzippy2 4 years ago
wow... U are brilliant, oh... and now I feel really stupid... I have been waisting my life. My brain only contains trivia from movies and TV, but look at U... impressive... most impressive...
Cristofer7 4 years ago
Jesus Christ, dude. How long did you spend making/researching this video?
HopefullyUnexpected 4 years ago
quantum theory is eligibly the most bizarre and hard to understand theory ever existed, it's OK to be confused ;)
munkiiboi 4 years ago
You don't want to know
KT45 4 years ago
Well lets just say that the making part of making this video (audio, animation, writing) took about 6hrs at the least.
KT45 4 years ago
Well made video. 5/5
Strangeholm 4 years ago
what are you doing here, he's mine!
kamenoko25 4 years ago
lol, snooze you lose!! :P
Strangeholm 4 years ago
A duel then!
kamenoko25 4 years ago