I think that at 2:59 there is a bad note (at least, not a very good one), at the very beginning of the central theme. I'd like an expert to confirm this, I'm not a musician.
@MozartIsFancylalala They are modern players, only the strings have classical bows. A gimmick I think, since their playing style is almost entirely modern. I do love it though!
@Jangof3tt better than Ma's easily, but not than rostropovichs. he played thoose haydn concertos simply to perfection, alot stronger and straighter, just technical perfection. probably also a question of taste which one you like better, but objectivly i think most people would agree that slavas is better.
I see that was a baroque interpretation, hmm... I didn't realize there was so much folk to Hyden till I heard this. This is exemplary for many reasons.
These look like modern instruments as best I can tell with this resolution. At the time this concerto was written, weren't the Classical period "hybrid" bows in use anyway? A traditional Baroque bow would be troublesome with this fast music requiring quick attacks and dynamic changes, no?
The wind instruments are obviously modern, not period.
This is so joyful. The camera work was done by someone who is neither a musician nor a thinker. A closeup of a bow moving back and forth is useless. But I digress. This is marvelous.
Everyone should have Rostropovich, who's the first, Bylsma, who is the best, and Wispelway, who is the happiest. I listen to this all the time, and have never grown tired of it, but the camera work is really annoying.
yes he did, and yes you must. It's amazing. He also recored the D major and the Anton Kraft concerto on the same disc. listening to the Kraft, it is impossible to think that he could have written the C Major.
Haydn wrote an early D major concerto that shows a pretty limited knowledge of the cello. Once he started working at Eesterhazy, he had a superb young cellist in house named Joseph Weigl. I think it is definite that Weigl helped with the writing of both concertos, because each is very cellistic and worlds more advanced than Haydn's early D Major. I don't think Anton Kraft could ever have written the d Major. He just didn't have the creative spark that permeates that great work.
Fantastic performance! Lightening quick, yet light and crisp. Notice the bows of the first violins: They are bowed outward, not inward. Obviously these players are highly trained in particular Baroque techniques, and this style bow is typical of Baroque playing moreso than "classical." It also has an effect on that light, quick playing characteristic of CPE Bach, Vivaldi, Telemann etc. Obviously it suits Haydn's style for this work as well.
In fact, the "baroque bow" was still used right up until the end of the eighteenth century even when the new "modern bow" was introduced. You'll also notice that there is a harpsichordist tinkling away at the back there.
Most people are unaware at how different performance practice in the classical era was compared to modern performance. like the baroque, vibrato was a little more occasional. Pegs for cellos were just starting to come around. Flutes were actually made of wood... Trumpets didn't have valves... etc.
INDEED. The "recurve" bow wasn't really standardized until about 1800 as you note. Harpsichord for continuo in Baroque and later (as here, Haydn) works was never really replaced. The Forte-Piano could substitute, but a modern piano with cast-iron frame is just too powerful an instrument.
"Authentic" performances with period instruments such as natural (nonvalved) horns 'n winds are fun but I think a bit unnecessarily 'purist.'
However, wooden woodwinds sound very different from their metal, modern versions. The dynamic and balance of the orchestra is almost completely different when you go back to gut strings, wooden woodwinds, etc. It's fascinating!
My channel actually has a growing number of pieces from the classsical period being performed on period instruments. Fascinating sound!
Oh I agree; however the technical advancements (Boehm mechanism, valving, metal wound strings, etc) in instruments have been adopted and accepted by both composers and players for the simple reason that SOUND is the whole point of making music! While I certainly grant that a kind of shift, sacrifice even, is made in tonal characteristics (I deliberately don't use the word "quality") it is more than offest by the volume, tone and Accuracy modernized instruments have.
The further point on that is also related to the environment in which performances are given. Smaller venues and chamber groups I agree benefit from "period" instrumentation and technique. But I do think the matter is kind of comparing apples to oranges: it's conjecture what Haydn might've thought about a Wagnerian brass section, but I still wonder greatly what Beethoven might've done with a Steinway Model D.
There seems to be a view that modern performance is better than period performance, when as you said, it's really like comparing apples and oranges.
I don't think there is anything wrong with playing 18th century music on modern instruments, but I think that we can and have learned alot from historically informed performance. Being really into history, historically informed performance is the closest thing we can come to time travel.
Period performance is all about going back to the source of the music. It's all about playing the music as it would have been played back in the day. It's getting back to the instruments and playing techniques that the composers themselves were familiar with. It's also about resurrecting the music of composers who have been lost to the ages, and resurrecting the instruments that fell out of use, like the harpsichord and viola da gamba.
Amazing! This is my favorite version of this concerto. I also noticed something, and correct me if I'm wrong, but is everyone in the orchestra behind him (except the conductor) a woman?
It is really good but I wouldnt dare say much better than Rostropovich!!!! I think that rostropovich haydn is one of the best versions of this concerto.
Viola and violin, imo is a harder instrument, just from the fact that it isn't as 'natural' to play (there are many more organic angles in cello playing), for example, you have your arms above your heart, the angle of your right arm fingers, etc.
I play the cello. Music like this gives me goosebumps. It grabs at the soul and puts meaning into life. A pure heart can do nothing but truly enjoy this. Nothing compares to cello music.
No, I don't think he meant the piece itself, but just the way the soloist interprets it. It does feel VERY rushed in places, particularly at the soloist's first passage, and the faster thumb position passages feel very rushed.
he is doing that on purpose. thats the way the piece is interpreted to him and by him.and u have to consider the speed at which he is playing. thats pretty fast and yet i still think its his interpretation
I know this is Haydn but I find his interpretation too simplistic, and the tempo a little too fast. I also don't like how he rushes the scales, although I know he is doing it purposely. His technique is fabulous though.
I'd like to see the 1st and 2nd movement first. I like the game-like play-around sound, but he looks far to serious when he plays :) it doesn't fit this music.
Indeed, it is mainly a baroque orchestra. But over time, they played more classical works... Their particularity is to have baroque bows but modern instruments.
lovley i love his cello and the strings he uses amazing performance i almost like it better than rostropovich i like this guys spunk great work what an inspiaration.
suuuuuuuupppppppppppppeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
MrDanvahe 4 days ago
Wow mi pieza favorita de Franz Joseph Haydn. ; )
vicho081973 4 weeks ago
I think that at 2:59 there is a bad note (at least, not a very good one), at the very beginning of the central theme. I'd like an expert to confirm this, I'm not a musician.
jgbusquets 3 months ago
@jgbusquets More exactly, at 2:56
jgbusquets 3 months ago
@jgbusquets Dear sir there isn't any wrong notes... its all good.. its just d minor with c sharp.. its all in urtext
IliekPVP 3 months ago
@IliekPVP Ok thanks :-)
jgbusquets 3 months ago
sorry but truls mork blows him away
Mizzles240 3 months ago
I'm working on this piece right now. Fucking Christ I wish I could play it that well.
SkepticalHumanist 5 months ago
I would expect somewhat clearer and brighter intonation for C major concerto.
plasticeric 6 months ago
HOLY SHIT
asylumzero 9 months ago
To me, it seems a little sloppy here and there, but it's good otherwise :)
cellostar13 9 months ago
que chimba!!!! jajaja espectacular.
cokkkies 11 months ago
Yo Yo Ma sounds like an amateur compared to this guy.
rolfeder 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
tong135799 1 year ago
@callofduty497 The way he's doing it is not so much rushing, as it is feeling the scale within the larger beat as opposed to a rigid 4.
Kwert 1 year ago
@Kwert Agree he treats it like a line of grace notes.
fourplusseven 5 months ago
needless to say, insta-favourite.
gooseiskewl 1 year ago
Even though I am watching this on a microscopic lap top I still get the urge to stand and applause at the end, fantastic!!!!
tightbeaver43 1 year ago 2
yap he definitely ROCKS!
mischamc 1 year ago
This is wierd... it has a baroque orchestra(partly) and a modern soloist... make up your mind!
MozartIsFancylalala 1 year ago
@MozartIsFancylalala They are modern players, only the strings have classical bows. A gimmick I think, since their playing style is almost entirely modern. I do love it though!
Svatopluk 1 year ago
@MozartIsFancylalala Only the bows are baroque. The soloist's bow is not baroque, is transitional, though, from the classical period.
peres010492 1 year ago
compare this version with Chang Hanna's
pietalpha2 2 years ago 3
This is my favorite recording of this movement, better than Ma's and Slava's imo
Jangof3tt 2 years ago 20
@Jangof3tt My two personal favorites would be Wispelwey's and DuPre's, because they're so different and playful.
yotubby123 4 months ago
@Jangof3tt better than Ma's easily, but not than rostropovichs. he played thoose haydn concertos simply to perfection, alot stronger and straighter, just technical perfection. probably also a question of taste which one you like better, but objectivly i think most people would agree that slavas is better.
Philboy50 4 months ago
gente uma hr vai cair a mão do cellista de tanto fazer virtuose!! nooooossa
dundunti 2 years ago
aww, look at the orchestra's baroque bows! haha, that's cute
fchu 2 years ago
I thought the scale was perfect, myself...
pressyboy 2 years ago
In contrast to the orchestra, I thought his cello sounded a little too soft...
pressyboy 2 years ago
pressyboy :
it's not easy to play loud but quick
cth12345 2 years ago 2
Thanks for uploading, I hope you will like my verision, I worked alot on it.
pbaron23 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Very good, some little inaccuracies but nevertheless
mariaimmaculata 2 years ago
I see that was a baroque interpretation, hmm... I didn't realize there was so much folk to Hyden till I heard this. This is exemplary for many reasons.
wysey100 2 years ago
its good
but not my style
gl7226 2 years ago
Are they using baroque style bows?
CelloConure 2 years ago
yea
iWyke2 2 years ago
These look like modern instruments as best I can tell with this resolution. At the time this concerto was written, weren't the Classical period "hybrid" bows in use anyway? A traditional Baroque bow would be troublesome with this fast music requiring quick attacks and dynamic changes, no?
The wind instruments are obviously modern, not period.
Schell77 2 years ago
I agree... 5 stars here
pikachoi2007 2 years ago
Wispelwey absolutely owns this piece right now. Nobody can touch him.
EndeavourMorse 2 years ago
An incredible cellist and musician, playing with a superb orchestra !
dissidencello 2 years ago 2
The best version of haydn in C on youtube!! Wispelwey is amazing!!!! :)
luisca2007 2 years ago 13
So think I. The baroque interpretation of Wispelwey and the orchestra is fascinating and more interesting than "classical" versions.
DuoContinuo 2 years ago
Great VIOLINS. and Orchestra
Viscamo 2 years ago
either my eyes are decieving me, or do the violinists have baroque style (wierdly bent) bows?
ALcHeMiStX92 2 years ago
HA, knowing how the pros are, those are probably Baroque bow's from the Baroque period, hahahahaha!! LOL!!!
celloprof 2 years ago
they do look wierd
letsruletheworld63 2 years ago 2
es unas de las mejores interpretaciones de Haynd en C amyor que he escuchado
xadlgx1 2 years ago
His bowing technique is something else D:!
NathanJayDog 2 years ago 2
Best Haydn in C on youtube....for sure.
nickakdag 2 years ago 3
perchè il suo violoncello sembra suonare da solo?!?
doctorgino2 2 years ago
wow the cello player's like awesomely pro. haha. <3 his expressions
xxmaliciousintentxx 2 years ago
Question: What kind of cello is that? It's smaller than others I have seen.
mhs6247 2 years ago
dang, haven't heard it that fast before. O_O
awesome performance :D
BOMBISHNESS 2 years ago
I think Rostropovich and his students' performances are even faster than that.
chriseok 2 years ago
this is sooo perfect
gunswiohdn 2 years ago
really good performance.
mischamc 2 years ago
Amazing interpretation!!!
asylumzero 3 years ago
Outstanding.
gumiproductions 3 years ago
I find it incredible that he know the whole thing by heart! :0
firebreathone 3 years ago
This man, is a ridiculous cello players. He is close to perfect, almost comical, really cool actually. I've never seen a bow stroke like his.
iplaywithnoshoes 3 years ago 2
Holy god, his right arm is insane. The separate-bow rising line is literally one gesture. So period. Awesome.
MikeDrewYT 3 years ago
This a period orchestra!
haha
I LOVE BAROQUE ORCHESTRAS
i think this is perfect for the interpretation of this piece
iWyke2 3 years ago
Urm....Haydn was Classical....
chriseok 3 years ago
ya but very early classical...baroque instruments were still partially the style then
befryxell 3 years ago 2
nice to hear a version with a smaller chamber orchestra, it sounds more baroque. nice performance !
anisometropie 3 years ago
haydn was a genius
classica18 3 years ago
Okay, so does anyone else think it's wierd that the oboe player is shown so much during the intro???
redshoes1000 3 years ago
Nah, the cameraman is in love with her ; )
vessobesso 3 years ago
Pieter Wispelwey plays awesome, really.
But listen to Jacqueline Du Pré she may was the best cellist ever!
MacPhantom 3 years ago
first violin needs to loosen her bow
halokev14 3 years ago
They're baroque bows, they're shaped that way, so she doesn't need to do anything to it.
Orchadorkcello 3 years ago
its called a baroque bow for you information. hehehe
balolin12 3 years ago
This is so joyful. The camera work was done by someone who is neither a musician nor a thinker. A closeup of a bow moving back and forth is useless. But I digress. This is marvelous.
Everyone should have Rostropovich, who's the first, Bylsma, who is the best, and Wispelway, who is the happiest. I listen to this all the time, and have never grown tired of it, but the camera work is really annoying.
PTCello 3 years ago
Anner Bylsma recorded this? I must listen to it!
blazingvirtuosity 3 years ago
yes he did, and yes you must. It's amazing. He also recored the D major and the Anton Kraft concerto on the same disc. listening to the Kraft, it is impossible to think that he could have written the C Major.
PTCello 3 years ago
Didn't Anton Kraft write the D major? I listen to a lot of Haydn and I don't think that the D major concerto is Haydn.
violatione 3 years ago
Haydn wrote an early D major concerto that shows a pretty limited knowledge of the cello. Once he started working at Eesterhazy, he had a superb young cellist in house named Joseph Weigl. I think it is definite that Weigl helped with the writing of both concertos, because each is very cellistic and worlds more advanced than Haydn's early D Major. I don't think Anton Kraft could ever have written the d Major. He just didn't have the creative spark that permeates that great work.
PTCello 3 years ago
lynn harrell's edition(with Neville Marriner and English Chamber Orchestra) is nice too. :)
fortyfiveTjqsd 3 years ago
no it's not
PTCello 3 years ago
no, it is.
fortyfiveTjqsd 3 years ago
lynn harrell's edition is nice. :-)
fortyfiveTjqsd 3 years ago
Pieter wispelwey is the best in haydn cello concerto. much more better than rostropovich who plays just fast and empty.
fortyfiveTjqsd 3 years ago
actually in my opinion, Pieter Wispelwey is the best cellist on the world
a20008137 3 years ago
at least for me wispelwey is the greatest cellist ever, :D, most alive music ever
unkown00234 3 years ago
he makes it look so easy...
krazycello 3 years ago
I love Pieter Wispelwey!!! I'm going to hear him play in Colorado, cannot wait.
UlfenDaddy 3 years ago
nice bowing!
emilysayshi1234 3 years ago
Fantastic performance! Lightening quick, yet light and crisp. Notice the bows of the first violins: They are bowed outward, not inward. Obviously these players are highly trained in particular Baroque techniques, and this style bow is typical of Baroque playing moreso than "classical." It also has an effect on that light, quick playing characteristic of CPE Bach, Vivaldi, Telemann etc. Obviously it suits Haydn's style for this work as well.
UlfenDaddy 3 years ago
In fact, the "baroque bow" was still used right up until the end of the eighteenth century even when the new "modern bow" was introduced. You'll also notice that there is a harpsichordist tinkling away at the back there.
HARMONICO101 3 years ago
Most people are unaware at how different performance practice in the classical era was compared to modern performance. like the baroque, vibrato was a little more occasional. Pegs for cellos were just starting to come around. Flutes were actually made of wood... Trumpets didn't have valves... etc.
HARMONICO101 3 years ago 2
INDEED. The "recurve" bow wasn't really standardized until about 1800 as you note. Harpsichord for continuo in Baroque and later (as here, Haydn) works was never really replaced. The Forte-Piano could substitute, but a modern piano with cast-iron frame is just too powerful an instrument.
"Authentic" performances with period instruments such as natural (nonvalved) horns 'n winds are fun but I think a bit unnecessarily 'purist.'
UlfenDaddy 3 years ago
Heh. Perhaps. :)
However, wooden woodwinds sound very different from their metal, modern versions. The dynamic and balance of the orchestra is almost completely different when you go back to gut strings, wooden woodwinds, etc. It's fascinating!
My channel actually has a growing number of pieces from the classsical period being performed on period instruments. Fascinating sound!
HARMONICO101 3 years ago
Oh I agree; however the technical advancements (Boehm mechanism, valving, metal wound strings, etc) in instruments have been adopted and accepted by both composers and players for the simple reason that SOUND is the whole point of making music! While I certainly grant that a kind of shift, sacrifice even, is made in tonal characteristics (I deliberately don't use the word "quality") it is more than offest by the volume, tone and Accuracy modernized instruments have.
UlfenDaddy 3 years ago
The further point on that is also related to the environment in which performances are given. Smaller venues and chamber groups I agree benefit from "period" instrumentation and technique. But I do think the matter is kind of comparing apples to oranges: it's conjecture what Haydn might've thought about a Wagnerian brass section, but I still wonder greatly what Beethoven might've done with a Steinway Model D.
UlfenDaddy 3 years ago
True. The developments in musical instruments were as much about changes in taste as well as making them cleaner sounding, or easier to play.
HARMONICO101 3 years ago
There seems to be a view that modern performance is better than period performance, when as you said, it's really like comparing apples and oranges.
I don't think there is anything wrong with playing 18th century music on modern instruments, but I think that we can and have learned alot from historically informed performance. Being really into history, historically informed performance is the closest thing we can come to time travel.
HARMONICO101 3 years ago
Period performance is all about going back to the source of the music. It's all about playing the music as it would have been played back in the day. It's getting back to the instruments and playing techniques that the composers themselves were familiar with. It's also about resurrecting the music of composers who have been lost to the ages, and resurrecting the instruments that fell out of use, like the harpsichord and viola da gamba.
HARMONICO101 3 years ago
I love Wispelwey!!!
Natalejo 3 years ago 2
his emotions so adorable.!
chobiv7 3 years ago
Yes he is adorable! But this is the first time I've seen a concert cellist sit on a Steinway bench to perform...
UlfenDaddy 3 years ago
Amazing! This is my favorite version of this concerto. I also noticed something, and correct me if I'm wrong, but is everyone in the orchestra behind him (except the conductor) a woman?
PhiliptheFace 3 years ago
No, actually the French horns, bass player, and pianist are men. But yeah, a lot of women. Julian Lloyd Weber's is pretty good too.
nofightsnecessary 3 years ago
I admire Julian Lloyd Webber so much, I had the chance to play with him about a year ago and mad to miss it through illness, very frustrating.
sowingseeds1 3 years ago
it's incredibile!! much better than Rostropovich.
Rinhos 3 years ago
It is really good but I wouldnt dare say much better than Rostropovich!!!! I think that rostropovich haydn is one of the best versions of this concerto.
fedegr33 3 years ago 2
i agree with fedegr33
kpxmofu15 3 years ago
finally a cellist who does not use his technique to play the fastest possible ...
I like this way of playing haydn!
Michicello 3 years ago 5
This is one of the things what makes Haydn respectable.
cartmaninlove 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if you feel uneasy listening to this, it's because the lead celloist sucks. this is supposed to feel thrilling - exciting, not discomforting.
WhyOweYou2b 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the lead celloist sucks ass. he's ahead of the team - chewing up time and distroying the instrument.
WhyOweYou2b 3 years ago
Wow, I need to practice.
beer1idiot 3 years ago
OMG this is the cleanest Haydn I've heard
aznmusicmaster 3 years ago 9
@aznmusicmaster I totally agree!
renatocellobr 1 year ago
sic nasty..
soccerfan802 3 years ago
Such great emotion.
wmd10 3 years ago
what a great soloist! he is obviously having a lot of fun, and he's fun to watch!
bookishmuch 3 years ago 3
cellists, the advantage of the thumb.
violalord1 3 years ago 4
muahaha
jonathantosio 3 years ago
Yeah, rub it in. We violists will find a way.
violalord1 3 years ago
Viola and violin, imo is a harder instrument, just from the fact that it isn't as 'natural' to play (there are many more organic angles in cello playing), for example, you have your arms above your heart, the angle of your right arm fingers, etc.
I have much admiration =)
jonathantosio 3 years ago
that's why it's easier for us to move up instruments instead of a cellist or bassist moving down. All I gotta learn to play is the bass.
violalord1 3 years ago
exactly--isn't as natural to play, so you get more physical problems than we do! muahahaha!
bookishmuch 3 years ago
It's fast, but that's nothing surprising- all soloists play it pretty fast.
rarecellos 4 years ago
I play the cello. Music like this gives me goosebumps. It grabs at the soul and puts meaning into life. A pure heart can do nothing but truly enjoy this. Nothing compares to cello music.
Pansy1980 4 years ago
I used to play the cello when I was eight, but gave up because it was too heavy to carry around. I might try to learn cello again...
good comment on music being good for the soul. Music is very good when your depressed and can make you more optimistic.
blackbook668 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i dont beleave the speed is real
lvzohar 4 years ago
"i dont [sic] beleave [sic] the speed is real"
Believe it and shut up.
Muaguana 4 years ago
Well as you can see, the speed comes from his risk instead of more his arm. But it is quite beautiful though. Great baroque instrument.
violalord1 3 years ago
wow just wow haydn is fast becoming my favorite
125NYC 4 years ago 2
Haydn's great. Wonderful composer when you need a smile ;)
sonata1992 4 years ago 3
I love the way he picks up his cello at the end
LOL
captainethanwebb 4 years ago
bravissimo!
heaventreeofstars 4 years ago
Love haydn music.German music and germany at its best.
greenfields47 4 years ago
Best interpretation to date.
jonathantosio 4 years ago
I can´t play that too!
aaabbbccc5 4 years ago
qué bien toca este señor! así se toca esa música, sin amaneramientos carajo!
a20008137 4 years ago
Nice one, but not rhythmic enough
1234bassy 4 years ago
Haydn is not rhythmic enough for you.. wtf?
TheOriginalEntz 4 years ago
No, I don't think he meant the piece itself, but just the way the soloist interprets it. It does feel VERY rushed in places, particularly at the soloist's first passage, and the faster thumb position passages feel very rushed.
TheTradge 4 years ago
he is doing that on purpose. thats the way the piece is interpreted to him and by him.and u have to consider the speed at which he is playing. thats pretty fast and yet i still think its his interpretation
csSpetzNaz 4 years ago
oh my gosh!... this is awesome
seriously tho... this piece wasn't sped up... HOW CAN ONE FINGER SO FAST!
Debziewally 4 years ago
what's the cellist's name?
stilliving 4 years ago
"About This Video
Peter Wispelwey and Violons du Roy (more)"
Peter Wispelwey is the name of the cellist
gpahdnon 4 years ago
Exelente , Felicidades.
celloser 4 years ago 2
Can you put the other movements?, Wispelwey is great, I saw him in recital in Bogota Colombia and he plays wonderfull!!!
Natalejo 4 years ago
very good. I like wispelwey. He's very precise and controlled in his interpretations.
thecelloking 4 years ago
Haydn è magnifico....
ciavattarmy 4 years ago
Bravo!!
BobKy12 4 years ago
I know this is Haydn but I find his interpretation too simplistic, and the tempo a little too fast. I also don't like how he rushes the scales, although I know he is doing it purposely. His technique is fabulous though.
celloboy81 4 years ago
I'd like to see the 1st and 2nd movement first. I like the game-like play-around sound, but he looks far to serious when he plays :) it doesn't fit this music.
brandoukov 4 years ago
He makes it look so damn easy! Crazy awesome!
CelloHaxxor 4 years ago
Wonderfull.Best ragards
cellomusti 4 years ago
who says men cant have multiple orgasms?
kenkim5 4 years ago
Wow, his fingers, his hands... At places they move with such an incredible ease!
celloKebab 4 years ago
Because their main repertoire is baroque - early classical.
handelbaroque 5 years ago
Why are they using baroque bows? Wasn't haydn alive in the Classical era?
HaMoOhAhA 5 years ago
I'm pretty sure this is a Barouque Orchestra.
CelloHaxxor 4 years ago
Indeed, it is mainly a baroque orchestra. But over time, they played more classical works... Their particularity is to have baroque bows but modern instruments.
handelbaroque 4 years ago
harikasssıın yaaa
cellomusti 5 years ago
Yeah how bout the rest if it???
mark9661 5 years ago
3rd movement very cool. Wispelwey plays it really "baroque" ^^
SejongDewang 5 years ago
how bout 1st movt
mark9661 5 years ago
increible!!!
elite1977 5 years ago
This is the 3th movement!
pbaron23 5 years ago
lovley i love his cello and the strings he uses amazing performance i almost like it better than rostropovich i like this guys spunk great work what an inspiaration.
jacquelinescellist 5 years ago
cellos rock!
cacabeans 5 years ago