after i watched this video, my insight is very open because the video is very good to give information LMAO! So funny, Ricky at his best! out of england stand up
@mogley52 stick your copy and paste christian articule propoganda. Seen the rubbish pop many times before. All that hate from your heart. Just ask yourself what would Jebus do?
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfuly framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
@SkeksisRule Yes if 'by his own jokes' you mean... something someone else wrote, that Gervais is merely reading out and laughing at. Seriously, who finds this guy funny?
@ibanezmancons Um, millions of people? You obviously don't understand comedy. It's all about the mode of expression. This pamphlet might be funny to read by itself, but Ricky's artistry is in his performance of it. Oh, and "seriously", you sound like the one no one finds funny. Keep your jealousy where it can't embarrass you in front of the whole world.
@Sei1863 It's hardly genius though, reading something and laughing at it. You aren't laughing WITH him, you're laughing AT him. "haha, Ricky thinks this AIDS pamphlet is so totally hilarious, ooh ricky :')".
I'm not jealous - I respect him, without The Office, Steve Carell might not have been so awesome. It's just without Stephen Merchant or Karl Pilkington to balance things, I think he's really one dimensional and an unnecessarily mean character.
@PartyAndTravel Not really, i upload gaming videos so i can relate with ya, its just that i feel Gervais is bigger than simply for his role in that game, even for that period of time in 2008.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
I love how he can grab something random and make half a show about it. "What's that, I'm next? Oh, shit." He looks down at a copy of home a garden. "This will do." He said.
u must read this. once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murderded in 1945. her body was not found until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 vidoes in 30 minutes the dead girl will apear in your room tonight and haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste to be s
I got Little Big Planet for the PSN welcome back program and every time I opened my goodie bag during a tutorial I would read the sentence "Why not see if you can get more items."
Every time I saw that my mind came back to this skit.
Touche Gervais for ruining the phrase "Why not" for me.
@Nzeexruos Thought I was the only one laughing my head off at that, I think it's 'cos there's just no relation between the walk and the fact he's asking "Why not throw in an onion?"
Wouldn't number 10 spread more disease than prevent it?! LOL, crazy that that leaflet was actually printed; at least we could get some laughs out of it. Great delivery.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I prefer micheal blackson, jerry seinfield and dave chappele
Whats the big deal with this? The better comedians dont need props to be funny, unless they are Steve Martin and can actually pull off a proper prop show. I doubt that pamphlet is even real
I laughed and cried so hard that i had to walk away from my computer in the middle of the clip. 5 minutes later i had the strenght to return and see the rest of it. Amazing!
watched ricky's bit about war, racism and stephen hawking after , he said something like this about hawking " why not go for a walk, well not a walk, maybe open a window" and immidiately thought of this
@dave2806 you're clearly too stupid to get his sarcasm, it's like sarcasm without the tone of voice you fucking half-wit. Now go watch something that you can get your simple little brain around
omg !!!! soooo funyyyyy
Phyxius0000 1 day ago
damn he lost a lot of weight, never realized till now.
alexicon89 5 days ago
I think he's good but not as good as Michael McIntyre
skiingchampion 6 days ago
now i have an urge to cum in a watermelon
onraj9mm 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this LMAO! So funny, Ricky at his best! out of england stand up
bebeheuy 1 week ago
I Really Like The Video From Your LMAO! So funny, Ricky at his best! out of england stand up
AntoMelta 1 week ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing LMAO! So funny, Ricky at his best! out of england stand up
willamricard 1 week ago
after i watched this video, my insight is very open because the video is very good to give information LMAO! So funny, Ricky at his best! out of england stand up
imegatrone 1 week ago
(jerking off) Mornin'!
LMAO
MarekPick 1 month ago 6
Hahaha funny. So different from the american comedians i am used to like bo burnham. But still funny
TwoStupidGirlsYT 1 month ago
Looks like 40 people didn't realize you don't always have to have anal sex.
SamirEscoto 1 month ago 25
Ricky Gervais and Frankie Boyle are by far the two best comedians simply because there is no barrier for them, unlike so many other comedians.
codecrt321 2 months ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its not funny
horrorduckftw 2 months ago
Oh and hilarious post :-)
AfroGaz71 2 months ago
@mogley52 stick your copy and paste christian articule propoganda. Seen the rubbish pop many times before. All that hate from your heart. Just ask yourself what would Jebus do?
AfroGaz71 2 months ago
OMG that was fcking hilarious :D Thanks for posting!
kricert 2 months ago 3
1:42 i had no idea homer simpson was a fan!
MrDnB89 2 months ago 6
Notice how there's alot of laughs but you never see the audience?
Sweetening maybe?
AmericaJustin 2 months ago
anyone else notice the back of the card is a picture of bannannas?
Airman32292 2 months ago
@Airman32292 wow im dumb, didnt notice that he said it at the beginning
Airman32292 2 months ago
he's not that funny : /
lurchipoo 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfuly framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 3 months ago
what is the leaflet? anyone has it?
jianh1989 3 months ago
#11. Why not spit it out?
Elohite 3 months ago
I WANT TO HEAR THE OTHER ONES XD
mrapter7 3 months ago 7
Hey Syadyx, what was this from? What was the stand up called?
mrapter7 3 months ago 5
@mrapter7 it's from his stand up out of england
cheers
Syadyx 3 months ago 9
@Syadyx its from Politics
Mackdaddy583 3 weeks ago
LMFAO. it's even Funnier because he cracked up himself
mrapter7 3 months ago
@mrapter7 u just copied one of the highest rated comments u sad cunt
P4PMike 3 months ago
ROFL!!!!
deblasco 3 months ago
I like how he's genuinely cracked up by his own jokes.
SkeksisRule 3 months ago
@SkeksisRule Yes if 'by his own jokes' you mean... something someone else wrote, that Gervais is merely reading out and laughing at. Seriously, who finds this guy funny?
ibanezmancons 3 months ago
@ibanezmancons Um, millions of people? You obviously don't understand comedy. It's all about the mode of expression. This pamphlet might be funny to read by itself, but Ricky's artistry is in his performance of it. Oh, and "seriously", you sound like the one no one finds funny. Keep your jealousy where it can't embarrass you in front of the whole world.
Sei1863 3 months ago
@Sei1863 It's hardly genius though, reading something and laughing at it. You aren't laughing WITH him, you're laughing AT him. "haha, Ricky thinks this AIDS pamphlet is so totally hilarious, ooh ricky :')".
I'm not jealous - I respect him, without The Office, Steve Carell might not have been so awesome. It's just without Stephen Merchant or Karl Pilkington to balance things, I think he's really one dimensional and an unnecessarily mean character.
ibanezmancons 2 months ago
@PartyAndTravel Not really, i upload gaming videos so i can relate with ya, its just that i feel Gervais is bigger than simply for his role in that game, even for that period of time in 2008.
MooreGamesJay 3 months ago
@PartyAndTravel That was all the way back in 2008.
MooreGamesJay 3 months ago
@Mogley52 Well, you sure have a lot to say, don't you? -.- I can't read all the way through all that to even get to what point you're trying to make.
thescoopforspoons 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 3 months ago
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
I think whoever wrote that missed the point somewhat.
LucifersSweetAngel 3 months ago
I can't look at cantaloupe without giggling.
cinnarose 4 months ago
Please, humanity needs to know the other 5!!!
Spectrum345 4 months ago 2
#4 is terrible advice, since cumming in a fruit is exactly what they are trying to steer you away from.
KSarty 4 months ago 3
@KSarty Haha! I don't think Americans will understand that...
Blablablabla1ify 4 months ago
@Blablablabla1ify oh and im an american
anessone 4 months ago
@Blablablabla1ify I'm American. I must be a real rarity...
2LiveByMusic 4 months ago
@KSarty lol nice
anessone 4 months ago
34 people were standing under said window.
evilmasterful 4 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He is Really Bill Maher In this... and Not in the Good Way (Smug and Laughing at his own Jokes like "I'm Funny!!")
AmericaJustin 5 months ago
@AmericaJustin It's not his jokes. Not sure you got it, but it was a flyer he found, and the giggling is, in performance terms called "selling it".
ronnysoeberg 4 months ago
I love how he can grab something random and make half a show about it. "What's that, I'm next? Oh, shit." He looks down at a copy of home a garden. "This will do." He said.
chaosvschoco 5 months ago 3
i love when people laugh at the joke as they're telling it. it makes it so much more exciting
PsychoPirate1166 5 months ago 78
34 people didn't make it to the window in time.
muddy1914 5 months ago 2
#11: Why not pop knob in fanny instead of up the arse?
dannycalypse 5 months ago
WHY NOT???????????
jpgrgmgs 5 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
u must read this. once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murderded in 1945. her body was not found until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 vidoes in 30 minutes the dead girl will apear in your room tonight and haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste to be s
sleepyb39 5 months ago
what fruit, ooh not a pineapple, ooh FUCKIN HELL
funn104 5 months ago
I cum in kiwis
xarealpersonx 6 months ago
"The Office" LOL!
chaosinorderrr 6 months ago
"I don't trust you, I'm putting on a shower cap." -HAHAHA!! Imagine that! xD
toxiqhugz 6 months ago
All of it is made 100x funnier by the fact that he's laughing as he reads the flyer xD
KittiMitties 6 months ago 65
Comment removed
KittiMitties 6 months ago
that can't be real :DDD
guzsaj 6 months ago
What fruit? Not a pineapple! FUCKIN' HELL
Zoidberg0789 6 months ago 4
i love his laughter and when he makes a girly voice...fucking hilarious
assortedpicnicants 6 months ago 5
Come on his back!
imonaboat73 6 months ago
You may all laugh at these tips, but I'm sure I'd have AIDS now if I hadn't started cumming out of windows 20 years ago.
Udany147 6 months ago 8
"I don't trust you, i'm putting on a shower cap"..LOL!
23Tev 6 months ago 43
im never eating watermelon again!!!
hondamx450 7 months ago 5
I got Little Big Planet for the PSN welcome back program and every time I opened my goodie bag during a tutorial I would read the sentence "Why not see if you can get more items."
Every time I saw that my mind came back to this skit.
Touche Gervais for ruining the phrase "Why not" for me.
Nisshoku1729 7 months ago 6
1992 votes, YAY BIRTHYEAR! (sorry, couldnt resist) This bit is one of my favourites!
mdsatan 7 months ago
1984 likes so far. Nobody like until Orwell says so
TheSilentPassion 7 months ago
what does he mean by the office
TheRoflknif 7 months ago
@TheRoflknif
He co-wrote and directed 'The Office'.
zombiewoof63 7 months ago
@zombiewoof63 Yes ok but what is 'the office"
TheRoflknif 7 months ago
@TheRoflknif
You took the trouble to reply to my message but not to Google 'The Office'
zombiewoof63 7 months ago
@zombiewoof63 i thought you would know
TheRoflknif 7 months ago
@TheRoflknif
Nope, don't have a clue. Never heard of it.
zombiewoof63 7 months ago
@zombiewoof63 I can detect more than a hint of sarcasm in that comment and it made me bare nearly piss myself.
beeniefide 7 months ago
@TheRoflknif a tv show :) a comedy
Ibakecookiess 6 months ago
@TheRoflknif He means "the office" is the greatest sentence ever written.
talkaboutbad 6 months ago
@talkaboutbad the sentences in the office rather hes comparing himself to Shakespeare.
talkaboutbad 6 months ago
31 people have relation with fruits.
maxhui 7 months ago 2
"see, i f****** told ya!" :))))))))))))
amandla22323 7 months ago 4
31 people are allergic to fruit
fluffykat1 7 months ago
haha i love the guy who is just laughing so hard at 1:40
amor987654321 7 months ago
hey! thanks for the tips! :D
loro333 7 months ago
let's do one, NOW.
SMaRtguy381983 7 months ago
2:47
I dunno what it is about that walk he does, but fuckin' A, it gets me every time.
Nzeexruos 7 months ago 3
@Nzeexruos Thought I was the only one laughing my head off at that, I think it's 'cos there's just no relation between the walk and the fact he's asking "Why not throw in an onion?"
LynkxMan 7 months ago
that is the funnyest shit ever
out a window
tubbyloo1 8 months ago
I cum out of a window everyday, although the rest of the people on the train tend not to like it.
ogfunk187 8 months ago 7
1.Office 2.Shakespeare 3.Dickins
JJJJJPPPPP27 8 months ago
I sooo want read all of that leaflet!
shannonbriggs100 8 months ago
Wouldn't number 10 spread more disease than prevent it?! LOL, crazy that that leaflet was actually printed; at least we could get some laughs out of it. Great delivery.
LadyVLR 8 months ago
@LadyVLR
no it wouldnt actually.
trymebeautiful 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You may very well say that - I could not possibly comment
1947Gentleman 8 months ago
Note the glossy sheen in his hair - what does he use?
1947Gentleman 8 months ago 6
@1947Gentleman cum
HowManyTimes234 8 months ago
Why not upload the whole show?!
TheLegendaryDoc 8 months ago
Personally, I wanna know 5-9
Invaishir 8 months ago 8
"why not just throw in a onion" lol! genius
TheEasterRebel 8 months ago
@TheEasterRebel
thats the best part lmao
thehumanbirdie 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This guy is rubbish, i thought of this shit before he did.
MckMick 8 months ago
Comment removed
TheTranceproduction 8 months ago
@TheTranceproduction I was being sarcastic you dickheads, Ricky Gervais is the greatest man to have walked on the earth.
MckMick 8 months ago
@MckMick BECAUSE I WOULD REALLY SAY THAT I THOUGHT ABOUT CUMMING IN HAIR AND OUTSIDE WINDOWS BEFORE HE DID.
MckMick 8 months ago
You would think that one of those reasons would be "Why not use a condom?".
MSkull01 9 months ago 112
The hair....????
sazji 9 months ago
Why not come on your dog?
richard20bris 9 months ago
Why not come up an exhaust pipe?
richard20bris 9 months ago
@richard20bris or come on the plant
chidorirasengan369 9 months ago
i dont get it. what happened to condoms? that pamplet is as dumb as the abstinence preaching in high school (except its funnier)
allymiley 9 months ago 5
This is so funny, fantastic build up and timing. It is also good to see a comedian enjoy himself
davidchamberlain4 9 months ago
next time i have some watermelon... xD
Brady2k10 9 months ago
not the hair
lobosnumero2 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gays = faggots
splintercellftw 9 months ago
@splintercellftw
IN OTHER NEWS, WATER IS WET
nhonho23 9 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I prefer micheal blackson, jerry seinfield and dave chappele
Whats the big deal with this? The better comedians dont need props to be funny, unless they are Steve Martin and can actually pull off a proper prop show. I doubt that pamphlet is even real
13abie 9 months ago
The ultimate of comedy on youtube, BRILLIANT!!! :D
PODledge92 9 months ago
............I couldnt even breathe
hbhisunavailable 9 months ago
23 people were victims of number 10
TheMizDog 10 months ago
I don't trust you I'm gonna put on a shower cap part made me spit out my milk.
ROFLSoldiers 10 months ago
that walk is so random when he says 'why not throw in an onion' @2:47
kitt998 10 months ago 8
omg i dont know why but when he read number 2 j laughed so hard i cryed my eyes are still watering
LovePeaceLennon22 10 months ago
I laughed and cried so hard that i had to walk away from my computer in the middle of the clip. 5 minutes later i had the strenght to return and see the rest of it. Amazing!
bananmange 10 months ago 7
i want to watch the other clips to this stand up, but i also don't want to. i wonder if should wait til a rainy day.
jstb0b 10 months ago
This deserves so many more views!!!!
PODledge92 10 months ago
I love all the individual laughs you can pick out from the audience ^^
But Ricky's laugh is just the most infectious ever
tishtosh 10 months ago 7
wow this guy is kind of ruhtarded
pfranks44 10 months ago
watched ricky's bit about war, racism and stephen hawking after , he said something like this about hawking " why not go for a walk, well not a walk, maybe open a window" and immidiately thought of this
MrPasswordispassword 10 months ago
i was dying during the cum on his back bit
orme96 10 months ago
this is unreal....too funny
mchudi91 11 months ago
watermelon! thank you...
gent070 11 months ago
love Ricky!!! he's the best!!!
Mibbedib 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
one day this self important prick will get the kicking of his life , or there is not a god !
dave2806 11 months ago
@dave2806 He will never 'get the kicking of his like', then.
Ubiitsa91 11 months ago
@Ubiitsa91 "like".....same sad twat as your hero then ?
dave2806 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dave2806 Sorry Mr.Typopolice, I'd rather believe in Ricky Gervais than God. At least I can prove he is real.
Ubiitsa91 11 months ago 244
@Ubiitsa91 hahahahaha
neongreenheart23 10 months ago
@Ubiitsa91 Or is he now? Never trust men who seem TOO funny to be true.
All love from Norway too Ricky. <3
roofstones 9 months ago
@Ubiitsa91 You can't prove that Ricky Gervais is real.
bradkey98765 7 months ago
@Ubiitsa91 Sooo True:D Wise Words!
CardZRfunny 6 months ago
Ricky is my new comiedian GOD!!!
CardZRfunny 6 months ago 3
@Ubiitsa91 I salute u sir!
AzaJabbar 5 months ago
@dave2806 i bet u and god use the watermelon
peto9876 10 months ago
@dave2806 you're clearly too stupid to get his sarcasm, it's like sarcasm without the tone of voice you fucking half-wit. Now go watch something that you can get your simple little brain around
SirrSnowman 10 months ago
@dave2806 well the last part of your sentence was correct.
MultiTrollHunter 10 months ago 3
OMG! Too funny.... come on his back had me crying.... when he pretended to kick the guy.... LMFAO
Nigol66 11 months ago
Where was the pigeon poo part lol?
Isthisthelongestname 11 months ago
Ricky Gervais is so hilarious. i love his new show An Idiot Abroad
masonnewell18 11 months ago
I just watched this while at Panera... and have gotten many a strange look from randomly laughing really loudly... FUNNY AS SHIT!!
quiffsthebanana 11 months ago 5
I cried... I have to say.... "why not both come out of a window?" - sooo funny!!!
Mibbedib 11 months ago 5
This is the fucking funniest thing I've seen in my whole life.
pigdog425 11 months ago 4
oh boy I havent laughed this much in months.
makk333 1 year ago 4