Battlefield bad company 2 (AMD Phenom ll X6 1055t + GTX 465) 1080p

[aryocabe]

my eyes burnts

[rangerjmt]

right i was wondering would bc2 run on max with this?

AMD Phenom 2 x4 955 3.2ghz ( I THINK)

Saphire HD radeon 6770 ?

600w power supply :)

[ukranianox7]

ahaha looks like sync 0:20 0:26

[MyThePooP]

tell me what games i can run with these specs

AMD X6 1055T OC @3,4Ghz

Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB OC

4GB RAM

[mrinsanegamer101]

@MyThePooP go to (can i run it (dot)com

[MyThePooP]

@mrinsanegamer101 ... i dont have the pc yet

[mrinsanegamer101]

@MyThePooP ok sorry about tht :P

[MyThePooP]

@mrinsanegamer101 TELL MEEEEEE ... please :3 

[mrinsanegamer101]

@MyThePooP idk i think it will but don't trust me i'm not sure youtube a video about it with the same spec

[MyThePooP]

@mrinsanegamer101 but the funny thing is that it just says X6 1055T not phenom II ?!?!?

[ABOSALH2006]

like because I'm in the video ^^

KSA_BADR

[SirkMerrill]

The resolution is weird and lower than 1080P :P

[SPNKr3]

THx for making this video Im now getting that!

[wilfredotour2]

@BrokenSF I have the 1100T Phenom II X6 3.3GHz and friend of mine has some an i7 Second Generation, idk specifically which, but both of us play Battlefield BC2 at maximum graphics, the difference is that he paid $1500 for his i7 and I paid half of that for my AMD. With the economy going down each day, gaming gets more and more expensive, but AMD gives you MORE than what you need for half the price of Intel.

[gazzxr]

@BrokenSF if there wasn't for AMD , 60% of the PC gamers would be on consoles , because most people don't have 500$ to spend on Intel processor.

[mystuff3040]

@gazzxr Entirely wrong, 80% of all cpu's are from Intel, check the Steam stats.

Also, 500$ can't even buy you the graphics card, how are you supposed to get an entire pc for 500$?

[gazzxr]

@mystuff3040 Read my comment again.

[uutttg]

@gazzxr - haha...The i2500k is cheaper than the recently released crap they call Bulldozer and smokes it in most every application. Intel offers choices, low end, mid level and high end. The only reason anyone would ever choose an AMD processor is because of brand loyalty,its certainly not because of performance.

[TheCiompolino]

@BrokenSF

Poor noob.... -.-'

[sami10331]

hey is battlefield gonna start on my computer :

Pentium Quad-Core 2.8 GHz

2 GB Ram

Sapphire HD5670 1GB DDR5??

On win 7 ??

[HazemHead]

@sami10331 Yes

to make sure go to Google > Can you run it?

[Darkteammadfiz]

@sami10331 Pentium quad core? o_O

[JERB69s]

@BrokenSF How can you compare the two??? i7's are better of course but at more than twice the price. Amd offers the BEST price for performance.

[ProblemOfficer3000]

Haha oh wow, you spend around 700$ on a pc just to sit in a bush.

[Nabs07]

btw Haz i still love ur channel, i think ur a legend and thanks for uploading that new Cheon In Jae movie for SF.

[Nabs07]

COD feels too fast and arcady now, spanws are awful, rushers and gunners are annoying and thats the only way to get kills, you gotta be extremely fast and have high sensitivity to survive, the community sucks (especially on console versions because there's no promod.live) sniping is innacurate at times and maps are smaller than my bathroom when i compare them to other game slike MoH or BFBC. In those games there is more "help" and "brotherly love" on the battlefield when going for objectives

[Nabs07]

Ive played COD alot and im getting tired of it now, ive watched players on professional levels during tournaments and watched hundreds of fragmovies from diff websites and COD is only fun when you play promod.live on PC version - when all the other extras like perks and corsshairs are disabled etc thats when COD is at its best but console versions are so shit and people are retarded on it.

[Nabs07]

Yeah BFBC1, 2 and 3 coming soon are all awesome games but often too judged for the lack of pace when playing but ive played it on a professional level and it is really intense and fast most of the time as you probabaly experienced as well. MoH is very similar (the new one) Hardcore mode is brilliant but it just sucks that there is no private servers to play clan wars atm.

[Nabs07]

His computer is beastly, as long as it runs good games then it's fine, what screen do u have Haz? 19" 21"? and btw AMD is quality, they got different levels of processors, some are even better than Intel core i7 (which is the best processor of it's kind) because they're designed specifically for gaming.

[Nabs07]

Respond to this video...  are u gonna get MoH?

[HazemHead]

@Nabs07 Not really, bfbc2 is much better in my opinion

I've 21'inch screen

[hiti333]

@BrokenSF

omg all the thigs you said its bullshit amd is better in gaming or realy tight to i7 in other programs in archiving and that stuf the i7 wins but not here you jerk, and its not 265 gtx but 465 gtx, omg

[teckim]

lokks great!

[fn2010]

i just saw it

great shit nikka

[HazemHead]

@BrokenSF Do not compare AMD with Intel on games.

They all run high games very well, but if you say with 3D programs

such as rendering. I'd say AMD, that's my choice.

+ its GTX 465 not 265 =,="

[Konfleik]

@HazemHead It's a fanboy lol, also considering that the X6 is cheap and if you want the same amount of cores on Intel, need to paid almost 1000$ lol.

[TobbenCod]

@HazemHead Do you know if XFX Radeon 6870 Is better than the 465 GTX?

[DooMixedUp]

@HazemHead pfft amd for 3d programs? LAME... have you even tried intel?

[HaTiM1985]

im really disappointed Hazem,, cos u set the resolution to 1360x768

com on dude put it to 1920X1080 to test the video card ;)

the title saying 1080p ,, how com!!!

[HazemHead]

@HaTiM1985 If i set full resolution while im recording it lag and my fps goes down. Not because of my CPU is week, my HDD is 5400rpm slow at writing and stuff..

soon ill get SSD ;)

[JenSeikiStudios]

This guys rich

[CraZyh3ro]

great quality.

noob playing.

[brodband4]

nice specs =)