I see two reasons that can explain the good under-sampling: 1. AMILab uses the GPU version of the VTK RayCasting when available 2. We set the sampling to manual (see time 2:26 of the video), which allows a constant sampling set by the user even when rotating the scene.
Seems like a great application for freeware; during interaction the under-sampling is very profound; no complains, it is a freeware yet OsiriX is a free as well but I do not recall such dramatic under-samplings there. Both seems based on VTK so why such drastic difference?
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for the comment.
I see two reasons that can explain the good under-sampling: 1. AMILab uses the GPU version of the VTK RayCasting when available 2. We set the sampling to manual (see time 2:26 of the video), which allows a constant sampling set by the user even when rotating the scene.
Best,
Karl
AMILabCast 9 months ago
Seems like a great application for freeware; during interaction the under-sampling is very profound; no complains, it is a freeware yet OsiriX is a free as well but I do not recall such dramatic under-samplings there. Both seems based on VTK so why such drastic difference?
stefanbanev 9 months ago