Added: 4 years ago
From: Scarletoccer
Views: 4,393
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hi Leslie

    The grade of the stainless dictates the corrosion level, if the correct grades are used and then "burned in" with the right chemicals no further corrosion occurs. As long as true resonance is achieved that is.

    PS: Love your red devil costume!

    To Dinwald, there is no change to the water if resosnance is achieved, what you see is NOT complete resonance but was just the start of development!!!!

  • The immersed clamps should show corrosion after a while. But tell us please if the stainless steel showed some damage. Thanks

  • A good way to look at it is overall power. One of the most simple formulas forelectricity is Power in watts=volts*current. Therefore, you are pulling 288 watts. Considering the relatively little output this is using a lot of energy. Although the output may look impressive, you need to centralize the output to determine the amount of liters per minute.

    You also need to run it longer and you'll see the water turn green because of the sodium chloride.

  • no offence...but everyone doing these experiments on youtube seems to do ordinary electolysis....didn't Meyer's cell split water mostly by voltage and not so much with current...sorry just tired of watching regular electrolysis

  • Again this is not ordinary electrolysis, try to replicate this output yourself and you will get almost nothing!

    The unit outputs Pulsed DC and the tubes are a VERY specific length and configuration.

    YES more voltage means less current but for a simple test I used what I had on hand.

  • hmm...first u add water..add some electrolyte...then put in some electrodes hooked up to a battery and switch it on....voila! and u got electrolysis going.. producing hydrogen..u get less out then the energy u put in...(this isn't how Meyer explained it).

  • Hello there

    The first test uses no additives, the 2nd one uses Iodised salt to etch the pipes.

    Regards

  • Yes the more you use the more you get. I built a electrolyzer and with a pinch of lye you get alot but when I put a teaspoon of lye in it, it did like this guy's did. So the more you put in the more you get as I said earlier. He probably used lye because it works the best, He did say he used something but wasn't going to say what it was.

  • nothing special, the more electrolytes yourve added, which you dont mention is causing the conductivity between the two poles

  • This is NOT standard electrolysis!

    The Device outputs pulsed DC and the length/dimensions of the tubes is critical!

    Scarlet

  • amazing how we can really see the hydrogen being pulled to the side and oxygen to the other. I'm easily entertained.

  • You've just got the power supply hooked straight up? I'm pretty sure you're just doing standard electrolysis, which is dependant on the current going through the water. You say you have it on minimum current, but that's probably just a current limiter in your power supply, ultimately the resistance of the water is what is going to determine your current throughput as you've noticed when you added the electrolyte which will reduce the resistance.

  • Meyers' claims are that he's using high voltage and very low amperage, (and by pulsing he's reducing his "duty cycle") and he's using tap water (or even distilled water) because it has MORE resistance. He's also using plates or concentric tubes because the point of the Meyers system is to charge the plates as capacitors and have them rapidly "spark" causing the water to separate into the gas.

  • As far as i understand the concept of using a large voltage and small amp to do the hydrolysis/cracking(which forms the basis for stan meyer's) is flawed, the total energy used is the product of voltage and current so even if you increase the voltage and decrease the current the net effect remains the same

    12 Volts X 5 Amps is 60 watts

    1200 Volts X .05 Amps is still equal to 60 watts

    Am I missing something here?

  • Your using known physics and mathmatics. Myers is stepping into Qauntum Physics which has unwritten formulas........Think of Einstien and Hawkins...Hawkins shot Some of Einstiens formulas out of the water.

  • Leave the quantum physics aside with all the formoulas. Amuse me with a simple theory that would at least remotely look plausible.

  • Ok.....Stanely Myeyers had a theory that was wanted by DARPA and NASA....hhhmmmmm I guess it wasn't theory then.....

  • You've just got the power supply hooked straight up? I'm pretty sure you're just doing standard electrolysis, which is dependant on the current going through the water. You say you have it on minimum current, but that's probably just a current limiter in your power supply, ultimately the resistance of the water is what is going to determine your current throughput as you've noticed when you added the electrolyte which will reduce the resistance.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more