IS F v RS4
1:09
Added: 3 years ago
From: luckyp103
Views: 51,233
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (165)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Lol I meant goosebumps

  • ISF gives me goosepumps

  • dont sleep on lexus man i own a is350 f and i do damage with it, i beat 335 easily

  • The is f is amazing

  • The naturally aspirated Yamaha tuned IS F. F as in Fuji-speedway where both LFA and IS F were tested. Wow!

  • Wow did u guys hear when that beasty isF starts screaming and leaped down the race way like Usain Bolt...the rs4 is no match for the beasty isF. Wow

  • Amazing grace, isF let me wet my pants

  • this is for the IsF haters...I hope your girlfriends flushes the toilet while you are in the shower.....

  • lexxr400forlife....do you know what you are talking about? Have you checked the slalom and cornering g and skipad speed for ISF?

  • yeah faster in a straight line.. but in the corners the sloppy lexus cant do shit

  • wat twin turbo? its stock on stock

  • is that is f a twin turbo

  • naturally aspirated 5L v8

  • amazing cars two v8ts singing

  • Old RS4? it is the LAST RS4 to came out.

  • @weed46 yeah but it's like 7 years old so...

  • This RS4 came out in mid 2006, so when that guy made that coment 1 year ago, and in that time, RS4 had just 2,5 years old, right now it has 3,5 years.

    is that old?

  • @weed46 lukidd's right..well bring on the 2010 one

  • @TheLexusguy94 no 2010 RS4. Only 2011 RS5 with 450hp.

  • @weed46 ur talking about the RS5, I'm talking about the RS4

  • @TheLexusguy94 So what the hell are you talking about? what do you mean with "well bring on the 2010 one". There won't be any 2010 RS4 or IS-F. not even 2011...

  • wow and everyone is talking that the rs4 is the fastest and I saw something different on this video.

  • wow, never thought that the lexus would kill the rs4 so badly.....

  • Do not not respect this Japanese Luxury brand. The Lexus LS have been chasing, if not side by side, with the BMW 7 and Mercedes S.

  • never said that i dont respect lexus....i think its beside bmw and mercedes one of the best brands in the luxury sector....

  • BMW and Mercedes make great cars. So do Lexus and Audi's. I would one day hope to own an S500 and 2008 BMW 750Li Alpine White.

  • wow.. raped

  • wait till new rs4 comes out....

  • The Lexus IS-F clearly overpowers the RS-4.

  • THE IS-F IS BADASS

    better then the M3 and RS4...the 63 is good but has a ugly interior

  • Rs4 and M3 beat this car just to let you know. ISF is a great car, but i think there is to much going on in the front, and I can not stand the way that they made a fake quad exhaust. It really pisses me off.

  • RS4 just got WOOPED here. and? you saying they "beat" it means nothing.

    AND FOR THE LAST TIME FOR YOU PEOPLE WHO DONT KNOW.

    THE EXHAUST IS NOT FAKE. LEXUS DESIGNED IT SO THAT HEAT AND VIBRATION FROM THE EXHAUST SYSTEM DID NOT DESTROY THE BUMPER OF THE CAR...THERE IS A EXHAUST AND IT IS REALLY A QUAD EXHAUST. ITS THE TIPS THAT ARE NOT CONNECTED TO THE EXHAUST...THE TIPS! Christ! A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE AND LESS IGNORANCE WOULD BENEFIT YOU. OH AND BTW MANY CARS ON THE ROAD TODAY USE THIS SETUP.

  • Lol, Calm down man, This is all opinions, You dont have to take it. lol your funny.

    All im saying is, RS4 and M3 WHOOP the ISf on nurburgring. RS4 and M3, don't have the power of the ISF but they have better turning capability. And yes, I know that it is a quad exhuast system. but why build a 70 grand car, and have fake tips? And those 8 gears. There is no manual in this car, and thats a major put down.

    Also look how I talk, and look at they way you responded to me, Im not barking.

  • and RS4 is 4.2 and FSi is 5.0 litters. and it means something ;)

  • LOl I mean ISF not FSI ahhaahha. I was sleepy. sry ... ^^

  • Well, what i thought you said made sense. lol. Because RS4 has a audi fsi engine. Funny how, both cars have same letter things, FSI, ISF

  • The F in the Lexus brand means Fuji.

  • Last time i checked. the Audi R8 also has fake tips...so WHY build a 160k car and have fake tips? =.='a

  • Actually no the R8 doesn't. And I have been talking a lot of shit about this car, but when i drove it the other day, it totally flipped, You forget about the 8 gears, you forget about that quad exhaust, and the minor plastic interior. The car is really a masterpiece.

  • What is a masterpiece?

  • Is this operation false information?

  • Actually no, its not because of heat. the exhaust tips were designed so it acts as diffusers over a certain speed. They are fully functional. Actually, a lot of high end exotic cars also incorporated this concept, but bmw and others have yet to learn (because they are getting fixed all day)

  • Hahahahahaha fuck yeah!!!!

  • lexus is a beast rs4 shit!!!Japan Power 4ever!!!

  • ha ha always knew the The IS-f would kick sand into that stupid looking german crap car.same for the dumb looking m3

  • thats funny how the is f waited for the rs4 and then still it won

  • who's racing???

  • I have driven BMW for the last 5 years (three in total). BMW are enthusiasts cars, you know full well that they are not the best in the market and you know they are not the most reliable but buy anyway. I bought a Lexus 4 months ago and regret not doing so sooner. I love BMW and will always love them, but Lexus make better cars end of story. Dont take my word for it though, a quick google search and you can see the facts and let them do the talking.

  • davehayes just like you I had a previous gen M3. loved driving it but too many problems. I have an 06 is350 2 1/2 years almost 30k miles there are no problems at all. Overall the Lexus is way better.

  • lol, isf messed up in the turned and then pulled away from the rs4.

  • RS-4 got owned; IS-F ftw.

  • Dude M3 and RS4 cannot beat the Lexus ISF. Accept it and get it to your head!! Only the Mecedes C63 can beat it 0-60 and 1/4 mile straight race. The ISF is the best luxury car in its division. Go look at the interior and youll know. The gauges is beautiful and the interior is detailed. Mercs and BMW is just BLAH!!!

  • wow that RS4 got smoke big time,but the RS4 take way better cornering though....

  • Actually it does not handle better than the ISF.

  • sorry - **No car nut**

  • Your comment about people not buying a car to last them ten years is absurd. People will keep a car for ten years if they still like it and it still runs good. Those who dont care or dont know anything about cars buy the BMW. The smart person will buy the Lexus that is luxurious, reliable, safe, with more features than any BMW could offer.

    IT IS TIME YOU FACE IT BMW USED TO BE GOOD, NOW THEY ARE AVERAGE, LEXUS IS STILL YOUNG BUT ALREADY MAKING OTHERS SWEAT. Lets see what happens in ten years!

  • Well seeing as the E46 M3 is nerly 10 years old and STILL beats or matchs VERY closly to brand new rivals - id say the Germans have the age thing just fine. Then you haev the E36.. same story! lol I love your comment - feel rich even tho your not. Ur so lost its sad.

  • U honestly think the IS-F is so much better only reasons it has a couple of extra DUMB toys no one will ever use and u claim it will last 50 years even tho its only less than a fkn year old. Ur an idiot.

  • Then u bitch about BMW being better here and ther but on the flip side claim the Lexus is better here and ther - so not only double standards but the Lexus here and ther points are useless. These are performance cars - the M3 is faster. End of story. Plus it looks better and has a track history.

  • 172 MPH no wonder. the RS4 is tapped at 155 MPH. put the MTM B7 and you have a better race.

  • designed for the colourless usa??? the car is made for japan..

  • IS-F!!! RS4??!

  • Remeber too that Lexus engineers design every aspect of the car to reach 250,000 miles. Try that in a new bmw or audi. Trust me I own a 1998 LS400 with 140,000 miles and everything still works on it, the pnly work that I have done to it was a timing belt at 100,000 miles but that is recommended. No rattles no leaks no squeaks and still starts up every time.

  • When you buy a luxury sports car like an IS-F or M3 or RS4 you dont buy it because its gna last you 250,000 miles you idiot. These cars are picked up by car nutz. I own an M3 - I love it but I sure as fuck will not be driving it like a bus for that amount of distance. Its not a truck. People in this market normaly get new cars every 2 - 3 years. 98% of the customers for this level of car will not keep it for more than 50,000kms on the clock TOPS! More like 20 - 30,000kms...

  • You may not buy it to last, but I do. Lexus designed the ISF to last 250,000 miles, something BMW or audi could care less about. You see I like Lexus because they think of the consumer, they build quality cars that will last the consumer a long time with little or no cost for repairs. You already bought a $60,000 car why should you have to repair it every few years for $1000's. Funny thing is their ISF still beats E92 m3, RS4 and other cars in its class by every aspect!!!!!!

  • BMW dont think of the customer - thats a sick reality. Its odd you think like that.. haha in your mind the German manufactures are out to get the customer.. are you fucking kidding me!

  • True that! Lexus is an impressive tool but anything designed for the cornerless USA is ultimately going to fail against a scalpel sharp cornering German sedan.

  • That is not true. Look at the skidpad test for the ISF and the skidpad of the RS4. Lexus ISF 1.15g / Audi Rs4 1.10g. Research before you comment, that way you dont look stupid.

  • Please for the love of god explain how the IS-F is better than the RS4 or M3! Please I beg you. I cant think of one. IT may match on some aspects.. interior quality for example. I agree Lexus are pure sex inside. Outside - id say no.. bit 2 Toyota looking stil. Please explain.

  • The ISF is better becuase. For one its a Lexus, which means the build quality is far above any Audi or BMW (consumer reports). Its is less expensive and gets better MPGs. The motor makes about 70ft lbs of torque than M3 and 60 more than Audi, which is more useful for everyday driving when coupled with the 8 speed tranny. The list of features is miles longer than any M3 or Rs4. You send me all the reviews you can find that compare e92 M3 and the ISF. The facts dont lie!!

  • lol you dont need 8 gears you twit. Even 7 gears is 2 many.

  • Basically u like Lexus because they last for ages .. like a Toyota and sure ther not that quick but then you get good MPGs.. (Not a deal breakr for luxury sports customers btw) I can tell your a Toyota boy cos you dont understand. All your points are what you look for on cheaper Toyota - Honda Level cars. When u buy a Ferrari u never ask the sales team ..aw how many MPGs I get?? Aw how many miles will this thing do - will it make it over 200,000? Ur a loser. Talk about miss the point.

  • I think your missing the point! Yes ferrari's are very nice cars, but for the money they are a bad buy. Example, the price you pay for a F430 you could buy a 911 997 gt2 and drive off in a better overall car (just as fast if not faster, good looking, good MPGs, and more reliable than a ferrari) All I'm doing is weighing costs/benefits of cars. When you look at it that way Lexus/Toyota are far ahead. Toyota/Lexus not only sold the most cars in 07 but made the most profit too!!

  • really? Toyota made the profit.. wow.. NO SHIT! They are the best at what they do.. ON THE CHEAP SIDE. They make a hell of a car for the entry basic level car. Ur not a true car guy - you dont understand the many other aspects to cars. Ur like an accountant.

    U can NEVER explain a Ferrari to an accountant. Basically your a boring person haha. Lexluthor400 I think tells us ur a nerd also lol - lexluther400 says "Why drink a cold beer when u can have a drink of water..its better on paper"

  • My point is that Toyota/Lexus know what they are doing, and are dominating a once german made car market. Bmw, Audi, Mercedes fan boys dont want to admit that in ten years Lexus WILL be dominating. People want innovation, Lexus LS600hl what other flagship luxury car offers that kind of performance, reliablity, features and value? NONE. BradV8 is not a true car fan because he doesnt see the future of motoring and wants to drive inefficient cars 4 ever. Lexus- "RELENTLESS PURSUIT OF PERFECTION"

  • If you want 2 get technical I would say drink a beer! Why? You have to consider total utility of both, plus cost/benefit. The beer gives you much more satisfaction and only costs about $0.74 per can. The bottled water does not give you any satisfaction but costs about a $1.28 (in CA).

    BradV8 I highly recommend that you go back to school so you can learn to make better more informed decisions on everyday choices. LexLuthor400 is for my 1998 & 2000 Lexus Ls400's

  • lol its so over your head bro! I love REAL cars - drivers cars! U love Merc wanna b Jap cars. I own an M3 and an Audi A4 - soon to be an E92 M3 and E46 M3. I love my M cars! U dont understand true race passion. Gucci purse.. lol jesus.. Ur the one talking about little tricky points about cars that dont matter. Luxury and performance car owners DONT think "im gna keep this car for 10 years" Look at how awsome the first M3 was - its STILL fast even in 2008! Lexus are only JUST become good cars.

  • I dont care how you or any other BMW onwer feels about your cars. The majority of people rate BMW as some of the worst overprice unreliable junk on the road. So it has PASSION, but not build quality. So it has HERITAGE, but not good value. Look for your self at "CONSUMERS Report" and stop with this biased opinion you have. I am just giving you facts, all you give me is passion and heritage. If they are so great WHY are all BMW models NOT recommended in Consumers report and all Lexus Models are?

  • they copy Merc they are typical rip off Japs. They cant make anything wow - only somthing technical. Ur not a true car lover so dont understand the other points. U wank on about this and that but u forget the IS-F isnt the fastest! Nor will it be the best seller. Nor will it EVER be in a car history book. The M3 will and IS! Peace mate - have fun as an accountant - go buy a Toyota its more cost effective.

  • Stop trying to justify your purchase of an M3 by saying it has passion and heritage. The ISF vs. M3 is a close match up and as far as everyday driving they are the same. So just because the M3 has slight advantages here or there, does not make it the better car. People like you buy BMW for the name so you can feel rich even though your not. I not wealthy but I'm rich enough and it is becuase I dont buy inferior products for the brand name. U dont know anything about cars other than brand names.

  • Your so far from a real car lover its funny. You talk like an accountant. With your thinking no one would even fucking buy anything nice. I have a couple Hugo Boss suits.. right..(not to brag - its for an example) Now do you honestly think when I got one of them I was thinking man.. I hope this lasts me for 3 years and never wears out.. Im also pleased its $20 cheaper than the shop down the road. Alot more to cars than little add ones and shit - why u think people stil buy 911 Turbo over GTR.

  • I majored in economics, so I would assume I sound like an economist rather than a accountant. I like to see the whole picture and weigh the costs/benefits. SO when I look at Lexus it is the better buy. People buy the the 911 turbo becuase again it is the better overall buy, plus its design is function over form like Lexus. That is why the 911 has not really changed, it does not need to its perfect.

  • research? I think you should my friend. I own an M3 and Audi A4 and have driven every single car in the line up of the AMG range, M range, Audi RS (from the last 10 years at least) including the R8 and SL65 (exp SLR) (and thats just those three brands) I used to work for BMW and have friends who own most of the cars you may to care to bring up.. so please carry on. (aw ..and yes the IS-F 2) That was a great car) ..seeing as facts are on my side id love to hear!

  • You know how I know you are just lying. You are just making it up you have driven all those and you did not work for BMW, why do when people finally realize they lost an comparison they feel like they have to make up BS. I think you finally realized that you were suckered into buying an overpriced, cheaply made, and inferior product. You have to own a Lexus to understand where I'm coming from. Bmw's excel at a few things, where Lexus is good at everything. Lexus Is just a more well rounded car.

  • Yeah the facts dont lie.. The M3 wins against all rivals - its why its the best seller - its also the fastest and best looking - it also has the most passion and best race history. Aw I didnt work for BMW? Why not?

  • People like you say BMW has "heritage and history". So why in 2008 does Lexus' first entry into the sport sedan market stack up so well against a company that has "heritage and history" of building fast cars. I would think they should be miles ahead of Lexus with all their "heritage and history". This is Lexus' first entry and I cant wait to see the following models!

  • U clearly dont understand passion and soul vs statistical performance. The difference is - in 50 years for example the M3 E46 or the E92 will still be sex on wheeles they will be collected and kept in show rooms as art for car lovers - the Lexus is dull - its a great car.. its fast - sure it even looks pritty good - but its not original or artistic - its just good not somthing u would dream about. Like a M car or a Ferrari. The Lexus is like an Evo - the Evos fast and a good car but its no M3.

  • You are right, I dont understand the passion people have for buying overpriced cars that perform at the same level as a car that is built better. Engineering a fast car is one thing but designing it to last ten years without major repairs is a feat of engineering that most manufactures wish they could do. Our difference is that BradV8 likes FORM over Function and I would rather a car be designed Function over Form. Which is more important when it comes to performance?

  • Lexus are "overpriced" it proforms NO better - infact worse than the cars u call overpriced and bad.. aw and the prices are nerly the same. The LS600hl is a very boring looking car! Thats what you and Lexus and Asain car companys just cannot understand and thats why u people never will - If I have to explain to you why a Rolls or a S65 is a nicer car than a Lexus LS600 u have a problem. The Lexus is a fkn good car - hey.. it may even out last the other 2 cars, but talk about miss the point.

  • I find it funny how you only consider the LOOK of the car in determining whether or not you like it. First you say it is a very good car, but the looks are boring (to you) so you dont like it. Obviously you are not a car lover, but an art lover! Please give me 3 reasons why a Rolls is better, and it better not be "because it looks better" thats just lame.

  • U clearly havnt driven a Phantom.. They are better than words. Go drive it. I know the Lexus are great 2 - but it ant no Roller. Also im sorry but ther is alot more to cars than MPGs - also Performance car owners (I know I am one) we dont sit in the show room crunching petrol costs. If u cant afford the gas go get a Toyota. I dont only go buy looks.. what part of the M3 is faster dont u understand. what part of history and passion dont u understand, what part of most advanced V8 EVER dont u get?

  • They are boring looking - the IS-F looks pritty nice but the rest of the range is ugly - they look like Toyotas from the outside. They really do. U place a LS600 - 760iL and a S65 next to each other - the S65 looks the best (the fastest by miles) then the 7 series looks much nicer than the LS600 2. The Lexus while probly being just as good to drive - mayb even a tad better still looses.. and il tell u why. Looks, feel and passion. U dont understand passion because ur not a true car lover.

  • It is all personal preference! You like the s65 over the others but as far as looks the 760il looks the best to me. But when it came down to comparison. I would choose the LS600hl any day over the others for two simple reasons, Features (LS600hl can drive it self on the highway) and build quality (will last for 250,000 miles). S65 starts at $194,000 and is a second faster in 0-60. Ls600hl starts at $104,000 and beats it in every other category except 0-60. Which one is better?

  • lol mate. Both cars are great but again.. over ur head. U seriously look at cars like an accountant. Sure one that likes cars but still an accountant.

  • I happy with that, at least I dont look at cars like a teenage girl looks at purses like you.

    BradV8- "Mommy I have to have the Gucci purse!"

    BradV8's Mom "This one does the same job just as well and will last longer, plus it is cheaper."

    BradV8 "But I wanted a Gucci purse!"

    BradV8's Mom "Too bad"

    BradV8 "But I'm a purse lover, so I have to like the Gucci purse, if you dont like the Gucci purse than your not a purse lover!"

    BradV8's Mom "Clearly you don't know purses at all"

  • no offence but if I haft to explain why a fkn roller is a nicer car than a lexus u are a little lost. U seem to look at cars like an accountant. I can imagine u would never want an Aston Martin or a Alpha. The M3 is known as one of the worlds BEST drivers cars. The F430 - the V8 Vantage - these are cars any car lover of any level or brand love - know and respect. U dont. Telling me u dont understand. Im sure u like cars - alot. But ur know car nut.

  • aw also - ther is a reason the M3 is called the king..aw and the M5 is called the king of the super saloons.

  • Whats that reason?

  • since when does going fast in a straight make a car the winner? It's about how it handles around a race track such as the Nurburg ring. RS4 gets an 8:04

    Plus some ppl need quattro all wheel drive with the amount of snow that they drive in. My friend has a SL65 AMG and she called me to pick her up cause she couldn't get out!

  • new king lexus

  • I wish i can afford the is-f

  • Remeber the RS4 was launched years before the IS-F.

  • the is f owns the audi , lexus rules

  • Only a few more 2008 UK cars still up for grabs.

    A phenominal first entrance to the performance saloon market. That's for sure.

    Thanks for your comments guys.

    Lucky

  • i agree with eurosport 2006

  • YES it GOT EATTEN BY THE LEXUS!! DEAL WITH IT!!!!

    It is the better car anyway...the day will come when it will get knocked off its feet...that day is here ;)

  • Exactly, so What u are saying is that both RS4 and IS-F are "ALMOST IDENTICAL" Peformance right? However, when it comes to dollar and cents Lexus Prevales! So, Lexus better offering luxury as well as performance in a better package than Overpriced Euro so called "Performance Sedan"

  • These are about all the same price as each other. You can get a 2008 RS4, M3, IS-F, or C63AMG right in the $ 60,000.00 range. Now, maybe you prefer drag racing and luxury. But me I prefer what its meant to do. You get the driving experience from the M3, its simply a drivers car. The M3 is and always was the best in its class, even if it did loose in a drag race. It made up for it in everything else. M3 still beat the IS-F, C63, and RS4 around the track with less power. M3 is still best in class.

  • and M3 is still the king of the hill by now!I am not Toyota/Lexus fun lover!and i don`t want to spent any penny to IS-F or any T/L`s!, I though that any T/L design Was Copy cat the fellow GERMANIAN!any T/L look a like Beemer`s! and I am a stupid man on earth who don`t like or to care about the price!It depends on tasty priority!If only i drive a car with domestic emblem`s then I am not happy and impossible to +enjoy life!!though jap girl is looking so beautifull in JPN!but boring!

  • RS4 driver can't launch worth a damn.

  • IS-F is the best period...Plus its a Lexus makes the offer look even better then it is already is

  • the actual edmunds footeage ha

  • There is also a vid on youtube where the RS4 wins acceleration against the IS-F...

    Obviously much is depending on driver and propaganda!!!

  • RS4 topspeed isn`t 155mph(limited), but 189mph lol!!!

  • Sorry to let u know too.. But the Lexus is also speed limited from the factory for 170mph! So don't be so suprised with out limiter it will pass ur RS4 for Topspeed run! Who's laughing now? Remember it's 8-spd auto much more gear to pull! than your antique 6-spd manual

  • The Lexus has a TORQUE CONVERTOR! LOL. And you call that a "performance vehicle?" What a farce. Is it even offered with a manual? Why couldn't they at least offer a semi-manual transmission, like VW/Audi's DSG? And do you really think a standing-start drag race is the best way to measure a vehicle's overall performance quotient? Let's see these two cars do a few laps at Willow Springs or Laguna Seca... My money would ride on the Audi handily dispatching the Lexus in such an environment.

  • whats the worst enemy of corners?...weight!

    you just lost your money on a fat ass audi.

  • if it's not a performance vehicle than tell us what it is? elaborate on that. RS4 at $68,725 414BHP and lexus at $56,000 at 400bhp. IS-F has 4.2 0 to 60 time...audi 4.6..IS-F is a few pounds heavier. Audi dispatching the lexus at Laguna Seca?...I doubt it with the IS-F's quicker acceleration and higher top speed, Rs4 tops 155mph, IS-F tops 172mph, I don't think the RS4 could take out the IS-F at the Seca despite the RS4's immpresive handling. And at $56,000 as opposed to $ 70K? I'll take the ISF

  • wow, tell me where your getting a $ 56000 IS-F cause last time I saw MotorTrend showed a 1,000 difference in between the M3, C63 AMG, and IS-F and they were all around $ 60K. I would rather take the M3 and beat both RS4 and IS-F at the track. It doesn't bother me about top speed cause there is no place to hit it besides the Autobahn. IS-F's BEST 0-62 time was 4.5's, Edmunds got 4.8 but thats crap. IS-F is great for its first attempt at the category, but its certainly not near 1st or 2nd.

  • eurosport car & driver got 0 - 60 in 4.2, the motortrend that you're quoting got it in 4.3 sec. do your research before speaking. this puts it as fast as the Audi R8 supercar. The RS4 can't do quicker than 4.5 sec. and a fully loaded IS-F is about $61,000. meanwhile a fully loaded M3 is about $69,000 so go to lexusdotcom and bmwusadotcom and price it out

  • The IS-F has a torque converter but it only locks up in first gear while in manumatic. Then it's hooked up directly to the engine gears 2-8.

  • what does it need a manual for if the auto shifts in a 1/10 of a second. most ferraris can do that. but a human cant.

  • what does it need a manual for if the auto shifts in a 1/10 of a second. most ferraris can do that. but a human cant.

  • WRONG! Do some research and check out BMV's RS4 test it laped Tsukuba slower than both IS-F and new M3. Only thing it did was beat old E46 M3 SMG. And it understeered pretty much all the time. I don't recall any "Performance" car would only understeer all the time? At least NOT IS-F or M3. And please wake up and smell the future, Ferrari F1, BMW SMG, GTR Twinclutch, Mitsubishi SST all of the above mentioned vehicle are Semi-auto tranny. And MBenz C63 uses Auto with S.A Feature too?

  • ofcourse the RWD will win over AWD why are they even racing?

  • your a liar dude shut the fuck up

  • wow are you dumb 8 vs 6 gears which one would you think win...maybe you should do some research before you start talking kid

  • wqent from an RS4 to the new M..Nwe M is faster...more tq down low...IS-F...would not even consider it...FUGLY...and got smoked by the M....

  • pls show the video

  • Lexus driver had an amazing start. unlike insideline driver which had massive wheel spin which leads to the slow 0-100km/h time as well as 1/4mile time.

    This video actually do justise in real life situation. Lexus if not faster just as fast a RS4 which had more hp and AWD and costing $10K(USD) and in Canada costing amost $30K(CAD) MORE! for almost identical performance? And it doesn't even offer Auto as an option?

  • dude..you want auto as an option?? Go grab some Playtex....

  • dude, you want an Audi for option? Go grab some O.B.

  • lexus is doing pretty good for there first time at high performance vehicles. there doing a good job of keeping up with the germans.

  • she can beat an M3 easily !!!

  • Haha, what a stupid comment. To bad the M3 will less torque and horsepower beat the IS-F around MotorTrend's track, posting better numbers than the IS-F. For pure sport, handling, and overall getting the real drivers car is the M3. IS-F is like a stupid attempt, like Cadillac's V-Series. Junk, never keep up with the veterans.

  • is-f makes m3 drivers go the otherway

  • Meaning right to a track while your junk IS-F goes to the gas pump and drag races. Its more than that bro, BMW M3 is and always was a drivers car no matter what anyone says. Its about the dedication and technology BMW puts in its M cars. M3 is an icon in its class, is and always was. IS-F is like the older CTS-V, it was fast and handled okay but than it just sucked. Maybe it could be a new story with the IS-F, I mean its Lexus's first performance car, its great but not best or 2nd best.

  • Just another ignorant, afraid to loses to a Lexus? Oh yeah, if SMG so great, why after 2 Generation BMW still can't get it working perfectly? And now they seems to drop the continuation all together, with a Twin-clutch design? LOL... Lexus so much smarter went the right way in it's first try. Just by tweeking it's 8-spd Auto to do a Twinclutch's job. And sure as hell it'll be much more reliable when compared with a BMW or Audi for that matter.

  • WOOT GOOOO LEXUS....the IS-F is a much better car...Lexus is the best

  • dumbest shit i have ever read. you obviously know nothing about cars.

    get off Lexus's nuts

  • "4WD bogs off the line. Rear wheel drive will always take off quicker than all."

    "In a road test conducted in 1995, British car magazine Autocar timed the Audi RS2 from 0 to 30 mph (48 km/h) at just 1.5 seconds, which they confirmed was faster than both the McLaren F1 road car and also Jacque Villeneuve's Formula 1 car of that time."

    huh...so an AWD wagon beat an F1 car AND the mcalren F1 off the line (aka, 0-30mph)...go figure.

  • No it nota coolest car,maybe 5 yrs ago . IS-F owned that audi. IS-F FTW

  • Bad driven by the Audi, he should have taken the start with quattro..

  • 4WD bogs off the line. Rear wheel drive will always take off quicker than all.

  • Hahahaha, yeah if you drive like a pussy...

  • Ha. Try dumping the clutch on an Audi A4 at 4000rpm and see how grand it takes off. I've owned one.

  • Hmm, maybe because an Audi A4 makes no power. An RS4 can launch way better than shown in the video...

  • P.s.- whos to say an A4 doesn't make any power? The new models come with a 3.2L six producing 255bhp. In everyday driving thats enough to get you places quick..

  • I drive a Audi S4, i know what i talk about.. 6000rpm and dumping the clutch should have given the RS4 the lead no matter what... i would only be difrent if the IS-f had slicks and were on a dragstrip

  • 'should have' BUT it didnt... you sound like the bmw fanboiz when the on the off chances a rare is350 beats a 335i... in this race the is-f beat the rs4... what are you watching?

  • Im going to say what semir86 said, thats the dumbest shit I've heard also. 335i owners with manual transmission pulled off 4.9's to 60MPH, where as the IS350 got what??? Nothing, the 335i still is best in class.

  • He is right...that was the worst launch in an RS4 i have seen...I went from RS4 to the M...The RS4 can and does launch better..M catches it around 100 or so, and it gains very quickly over 60.....

  • Your a complete idiot! The word BOG and Quattro do not go in the same sentence. You cannot BOG an AWD Audi. I know, I own an s4

  • Actually, go check out the Top Gear review of the BMW M3 and watch it smoke and M3 and a CL63 AMG off the line, it eventually loses it, but it is not impossible.

  • What I was trying to get across is that..Given an AWD model next to the same car with RWD..the RWD would take it off the start, and not just because of the weight difference. And Bishop...maybe it was a bit harsh to say "bog" but thats the closest word I could think of to describe that feeling. This isn't just with a stick either, the automatic tranny's response to a full throttle start shares the same symptoms. But..thanks for the idiot remark.

  • no, the M3 and C63, both RWD, were beaten off the line by an RS4, it's actually quite surprising.

  • it is not surprising at all....AWD....WRX STI easily beats both off the line...but the M gains quickly, expecially after 60, and walks by at 110+..I just got he new M after 2 years in the RS4...

  • Well ife i dump the clutch on my S4 at 7000rpm id dead not bugg off.. This one is a V8 non turbo..

  • I love the RS4, but that Lexus is amazing!

  • Yeah what a car! I'll get mine videos of the IS-F sorted ASAP!

  • woot IS-F!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more