I think you emphasize the economic relations too much, I doubt the Luddites themselves had developed their own social or economic understanding enough to want to act on that strength alone. Although the economic and the social reality and their respective relations are important; understanding why the Luddites did what they did is not so complex. They did it because they could directly observe and were confronted with an undeniable truth, technical progress was truncating them.
And a further point is that getting rid of capitalism isn't going to solve the problem, because the material and political privilege of the wealthy elite takes but a small fraction of the total productive power to maintain. At a certain point control of capital no longer means the power to summon material wealth but political, social and other more abstract types of power and so the 'class antagonisms' themselves become abstract and divorced from the practical concern of the workers.
Which leads me to believe that the real problem is the use of industrial technology as the basis for a society because the needs of the system turns the relationship between technology and society on its head, and humanity collectively becomes merely the basis from which the needs of the system are served. Paraphrasing Slavoj Zyzek, "Capitalism functions...almost as a kind of religion. Things must expand, things must develop and even if we all go to hell it must reproduce itself".
This video highlights the ever increasing mechanization of the forces of production, the consequence on the social and psychological level is, of course, ever increasing alienation in social relations and estrangement from one's own sense of humanity. Enlightened rationality has been perverted by instrumental rationality the result being ethical and spiritual nihilism.
The relationship between capitalists and laborers is antagonistic. The relationship between capital and labor is not. Worker cooperatives are at least one real-world example of the fact, and this distinction is essential in applying democratic control of capital to the development of viable alternatives to capitalism. David Schweickart's book "After Capitalism" is excellent reading in this regard, and Michael Howard's "Self-Management and the Crisis of Socialism" is a good companion.
Curious viewers should view the ongoing discussion about this topic on my blog. I think it highlights some crucial ideas about capital. The discussion can be found on the robots vs. luddites page linked in the info box in the upper right corner of the screen.
I say, that if we learned these things, as mentioned below, we would never have to worry about not having a way to support ourselves, as opposed to the system were now under, which we become more and more dependant upon as time passes, making us slaves to sadist. But, I don't see how socialism or capitialism can work as long as their is a group of people who are power hungry, underneath the guise of being altruist.
how in socialism? capitalism always works, but in the benefit for a few. i never understood how people say socialism is doome to fail due to the actions of the leading few. As long as a socialist workplace and government is democratic i don't see that happening
Ahh! Great analysis. New modes of capitalist accumulation and production standing in direct contradiction with its own potential essence (less work, higher quality goods) and with previous social formations.
Great vid! The only other person I know of who understands *why* King Ned Ludd acted against the Lancashire mill owners. I recommend reading "Die Weber" by Hauptmann, chronicling the contemporaneous Silesian Luddites.
I think you emphasize the economic relations too much, I doubt the Luddites themselves had developed their own social or economic understanding enough to want to act on that strength alone. Although the economic and the social reality and their respective relations are important; understanding why the Luddites did what they did is not so complex. They did it because they could directly observe and were confronted with an undeniable truth, technical progress was truncating them.
WSWarthog 1 year ago
@WSWarthog
And a further point is that getting rid of capitalism isn't going to solve the problem, because the material and political privilege of the wealthy elite takes but a small fraction of the total productive power to maintain. At a certain point control of capital no longer means the power to summon material wealth but political, social and other more abstract types of power and so the 'class antagonisms' themselves become abstract and divorced from the practical concern of the workers.
WSWarthog 1 year ago
@WSWarthog
Which leads me to believe that the real problem is the use of industrial technology as the basis for a society because the needs of the system turns the relationship between technology and society on its head, and humanity collectively becomes merely the basis from which the needs of the system are served. Paraphrasing Slavoj Zyzek, "Capitalism functions...almost as a kind of religion. Things must expand, things must develop and even if we all go to hell it must reproduce itself".
WSWarthog 1 year ago
It is possible robots will win, since Luddite fists and slings are nothing against robot lasers, tanks and cruise missiles.
TheUnknownPerson1100 2 years ago
@TheUnknownPerson1100
nope, the luddite cant use slings either, it would reduce the number of soldiers on the battlefield, taking jobs away from good people :)
Deathrune456 1 year ago
This video highlights the ever increasing mechanization of the forces of production, the consequence on the social and psychological level is, of course, ever increasing alienation in social relations and estrangement from one's own sense of humanity. Enlightened rationality has been perverted by instrumental rationality the result being ethical and spiritual nihilism.
ThePhenomenalmind 2 years ago
Great video! Highly inventive visuals.
millig5318 2 years ago
awesome vid!!!
laxman9677 2 years ago
great video!
luketheduke122 2 years ago 2
The relationship between capitalists and laborers is antagonistic. The relationship between capital and labor is not. Worker cooperatives are at least one real-world example of the fact, and this distinction is essential in applying democratic control of capital to the development of viable alternatives to capitalism. David Schweickart's book "After Capitalism" is excellent reading in this regard, and Michael Howard's "Self-Management and the Crisis of Socialism" is a good companion.
davidlkendall 2 years ago 2
Curious viewers should view the ongoing discussion about this topic on my blog. I think it highlights some crucial ideas about capital. The discussion can be found on the robots vs. luddites page linked in the info box in the upper right corner of the screen.
brendanmcooney 2 years ago
Great video
divinejudge1 2 years ago
I say, that if we learned these things, as mentioned below, we would never have to worry about not having a way to support ourselves, as opposed to the system were now under, which we become more and more dependant upon as time passes, making us slaves to sadist. But, I don't see how socialism or capitialism can work as long as their is a group of people who are power hungry, underneath the guise of being altruist.
1studentoftruth 2 years ago
how in socialism? capitalism always works, but in the benefit for a few. i never understood how people say socialism is doome to fail due to the actions of the leading few. As long as a socialist workplace and government is democratic i don't see that happening
prjctcivilian 2 years ago
Always interesting and important, Brendan. 5/5.
Thanks.
CaptainBluebear08 2 years ago 2
Good job, Cooney. You gonna slip us the answer in Part 2?
davidlkendall 2 years ago 2
Damn this is good. Always impressive, always educational. Thanks for uploading.
CitizenCindy 2 years ago 2
Fantastic film, Cooney!
jbmetzler 2 years ago 2
Ahh! Great analysis. New modes of capitalist accumulation and production standing in direct contradiction with its own potential essence (less work, higher quality goods) and with previous social formations.
Great vid! The only other person I know of who understands *why* King Ned Ludd acted against the Lancashire mill owners. I recommend reading "Die Weber" by Hauptmann, chronicling the contemporaneous Silesian Luddites.
pastrychef1985 2 years ago 2