The story in the last one was weak. I enjoyed it like one who is a fan of the Action shooter. But it didnt impress me The aggro system was flawed the AI paid just as much attention to the low aggro as the high, so it was almost like penning you into a strategy mindset only to contradict yourself by the very actions of the enemies this is supposed to work against. so if they reworked that feature a bit among other less bothersome quirks it should be fun, But I'm NOT SURE
doesnt seem to fun to me COD 5 has way more action and just looking at the trailer made me buy it this game it doesnt look so fun i mean there are millions of games saying like some world will get bombed this game is one of them i dont like same games
it looks like it would be alot of fun because of the way the people shoot and the amount of things you can do on it. But I'm afraid the story mode will be to easy or not long enough. Because me and my brother want a co-op game that we can play offline together with. And we are kind of stuck between resident evil 5 or army of 2 40th day. Because army of 2 seems funner but resident evil seems harder and longer. Could you do a review for each. Thx for your help.
@sdbmontage army of two is supposed to be a six hour co-op and their is not much of a change in story to online, so you can play with your bro and with people online :) hope that helps
I dont see anything that would link it to the first game and the graphics look worse then the first. The best part of these kinda games is the gameplay and story and looks like this was just thrown together to make more money
i rebuted my system for nothing becuase i thought it would fix the playsatation error and i like to play fallout 3 but i lost that memory and want a new game to play story mode and not so sure abou this game
I hear the graphics suck and im for graphics. also i see no gameplay around. not sure what its exactly going to be like. Havent tried it out. cool theme but idk... thinkin about getting it.
graphics and the story line...why would we care if shanghi was attacked by a terrorist organization....? isn't their military in the 20-30 million or some huge number?
i couldnt belive the first one didnt have the legacy controls, it ruined the game for me. if they added that control style it would have been kick ass.
Im not sure about this game. I played the first army of two and it really didnt make me want more. Playing alone was a joke and with a friend it was chalenging but got old fast. Looks cool though give ya that.
wow... I know that this will be a great game, I loved the first and still play it from time to time. But this trailer was terrible. Almost enough to turn me off buying the game. Seriously... bloody awful trailer lads
the game is seems very simplistic nothing interesting to show in this trailer. I see no plot or even a large hint of what the game is about. And from what I do see... it doesn't look good
I didn't see much gameplay there, but if it anything like the first it should be a good game. Not sure if I would buy it though, I don't see anything really that new and interesting.
game play didn't like the first game, even though i thought it looked good. felt it tried to be a better coop version of gears of war but didn't make it. graphics are important to me that why i have a next gen console and a 52 inch sony. But, I don't care if the game looks awesome but the gameplay sucks their not getting my money. I look on my shelf and there are'nt any EA games on it. but that's just me.
the graphics still are not pached so thats why there not good fags... they need to tuch the game up alittle. if u like the first than get the second... 60 $ money well spent fellas
I cant believe how people now care so much about the precious graphics it can sway them to not buy something. If the worst computer on earth looked shiny and futuristic but the best one looked like a piece of poo would you buy the bad one because it looks better?
well judging by the little story presented in the trailer it seems that the army of two will once again be fighting other mercenaries which really isn't too entertaining. If the story again starts to revolve around mercenary organizations gone rogue then i dont see much hope for the game's story. dont really care about the graphics and im sure they will be better than in the trailer since the graphics shown in the trailer does not even remotely compare to the original army of two.
the graphics look pretty horrible... it looks like a ps2 game... and the story looks like it could be better... it just doesn't convince me that i should buy it..
I think I'm saying what everyone else here has said. The first game was amazing, this one looks good, but the graphics seem worse than the first one (which was made like, what, 3 years ago?)
The first game was to short. More missons! The grafics is okey i could been better! (you should have the possibility to fight against your friends NON Online)!
I got bored on the first like after i cleared all missions!
well it looked in bad grafics and it doesnt look like realy hardcore y prefere mw2 because its hardcore and realistic but y played the first y liked it but not that mutch
everyone should be uncertain...there was not a single clip of gameplay...that's what matters not a little video preview -.- you can't want/not want a anything if you don't know what it is
in number 1 it looks more fun with the guns the action with this 1 just looks like its bomb after bomb no hard stuff when you have to think how to play the game
I loved the partner mecanics in the first game but i think they needed something more. It's great to play with one buddy but i have more then one friend. I would like it if they made the game same mecanics but as a squad of four or five. And each person woud be able to customize like in the firsts game campain. Image a team of masked gunmen that would be sick.
not sure about this, first game was O.K. i thought it was a bit cheesy and that they cursed wayyy too much. Gameplay was great for co-ops, campaign had a bit of an unrealistic story and was very repetitive. Overall, I'd give the last one 3 out of 5 stars. Not sure about this one
first i finished the gamne in about 2 or 3 days.i rented it in blockbuster and it was great at the begining but as levels passed i started to get a bit sick of the repetetive levels and the predictive story....is a game that has so much potential but has no story, no variation and the weapons just dont look real...i dont know if im buyin or again renting this one.....the last one was a waste
the storyline set looks great and i love any form of co-op to play with friends (esp split screen), but some of the visual effects in the trailer look dated, and the characters, even in the first Army of Two, were shallow-the variation in weapons was always an enhancement to the game tho!
Looks almost exactly the same, graphics still aren't the best. The guns layout was cool but the multiplayer and story were weak. They only like added flamethrowers :/
First person action is missing..but there are others that like the 3rd person i gues..But thats my opinion.. Create it so that you can choose between 3rd and 1st person..i think that would be a great achievement.
I just don't want the game to be short, I want it to be a game that will take days for me to complete, and worth buying! But I still loved the first one
i agree with reedy911 but also the first one felt out of place and i havent played it just saw the ad and was thinking gears of war's crap ass cuzen even with a low price . in short make it worth my time and money i mean if im gonna pay 63.00 bucks on this it really better be good or that companys brand is out
plan and simple the first game was a huge let down, the promise of the first games coop game play was kool but a huge let down in actual game play, the online portion should have been cut because it was so bad. the graphics for both games seem so second rate im suprise its from that big of a company. they really shot them selfs in the foot with this game
i think the ruined this one they changed the voices graphics and they both got tattoos and some of salems old tattoos r now gone might rent it for a day to get the achievements but to buy it no way
because there is a bar above u telling you your gun is going to over heat
DIEHARD778 9 months ago
The story in the last one was weak. I enjoyed it like one who is a fan of the Action shooter. But it didnt impress me The aggro system was flawed the AI paid just as much attention to the low aggro as the high, so it was almost like penning you into a strategy mindset only to contradict yourself by the very actions of the enemies this is supposed to work against. so if they reworked that feature a bit among other less bothersome quirks it should be fun, But I'm NOT SURE
thatsaintguy 1 year ago
Why are people not sure about buying this game JUST because of the visuals. It's stupid.I'm just not sure if i'll like it or not.
Arran961 1 year ago
dont know much adout it just yet gonna keep looking
chinchilla2571 1 year ago
the graphics r bad
12migoo 1 year ago
graphics :(
dfndjasper 1 year ago
It hadn't a good story
TheDoronTv 1 year ago
can you even lean up against walls like rainbow 6
lahuuzaher 1 year ago
the first i playec this one it got too boring too fast but ill have to play it again
ICPrulz2753 1 year ago
It looks pretty much the same as the first one, but with diff levels..
MikeShanoda 1 year ago
doesnt seem to fun to me COD 5 has way more action and just looking at the trailer made me buy it this game it doesnt look so fun i mean there are millions of games saying like some world will get bombed this game is one of them i dont like same games
acciddropproductions 1 year ago
The plot doesn't seem good. Don't get me wrong I loved the first one, but it just seems like they rushed to make a sequel. I hope I'm wrong...
Altare216 1 year ago
The plot doesn't seem good. Don't get me wrong I loved the first one, but it just seems like they rushed to make a sequel. I hope I'm wrong...
Altare216 1 year ago
the grafic is not good
codmw2sinperpro 1 year ago
dudus the game have a good grafhic ... just watch that video
/watch?v=6VY5usiBPuc
HeavyMetalGurke 1 year ago
graphics and effecs looks not good
ToxicPeoples 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the graphics dont look that good...
brunako78 1 year ago
have not played the game yet but it looks good
brendonfears 1 year ago
graphics are week
oubound5312 1 year ago
because you like penis
Rockburns123 1 year ago
it looks like it would be alot of fun because of the way the people shoot and the amount of things you can do on it. But I'm afraid the story mode will be to easy or not long enough. Because me and my brother want a co-op game that we can play offline together with. And we are kind of stuck between resident evil 5 or army of 2 40th day. Because army of 2 seems funner but resident evil seems harder and longer. Could you do a review for each. Thx for your help.
sdbmontage 1 year ago
@sdbmontage army of two is supposed to be a six hour co-op and their is not much of a change in story to online, so you can play with your bro and with people online :) hope that helps
001FLUXX100 1 year ago
game is ok but it should have been longer. this one seemed shorter than the first.
benevolent75 1 year ago
I dont see anything that would link it to the first game and the graphics look worse then the first. The best part of these kinda games is the gameplay and story and looks like this was just thrown together to make more money
Lochnesslf 1 year ago
graphics don't look good
barralpadd 1 year ago
Metar Gear Solid for PS3 came out in 2008 and makes almost every other game graphics look terrible!! come on is 2010 show it..
LiuCubanito 1 year ago
@LiuCubanito Metal******
LiuCubanito 1 year ago
Since when the hell do graphics matter?
I dunno, it looks too redundant, too much of the same cool tricks just over and over again.
The feint death and the fake hostage and surrendering thing.
dougd1015 1 year ago
The graphics look like they could be better and the first one's trailer looks a lot better.
HackYourFace 1 year ago
I dont want to play the first 1 again it was soooooo boring
CantStopMe19 1 year ago
ok just get normal army of two for x box 360 awesome game funn to good story
meepster08 1 year ago
i just dont get the whole consept
SuperUin13 1 year ago
the graphic is not that good also the game play doesnt look so good to me ;/
7antosh010 1 year ago
I dont like the graphics, and the gameplay does'nt look to good.. and bad story .. wtf?
PlayWithASmile 1 year ago
need more info
ArcSpartan009 1 year ago
i rebuted my system for nothing becuase i thought it would fix the playsatation error and i like to play fallout 3 but i lost that memory and want a new game to play story mode and not so sure abou this game
anthonyhic 1 year ago
the graphics seem crappy well not crappy but not good
debramster123 1 year ago
Played the demo. I'm not that thrilled. I think I liked the first one better, honestly.
ReadiedFM 1 year ago
graphics is not that bad but explosion and smoke are worst
gamingTIBIN 1 year ago
graphics and animation dont seem very good.
a7sas7lo 1 year ago
graphics and animation dont seem very good.
brawlitup 1 year ago
graphics arent good. it doesnt look interesting. and it doesnt seem like there.
s a story
TheJordan1985 1 year ago
i dunno.. doesnt seem to be any point to it. looks just like a bunch of guns to me
XcatchX22 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@XcatchX22
Play the first one, then you will get the idea
Yuiui7637 1 year ago
the trailer had no gameplay or anything exciteing, looks like another war game
CastawayRY 1 year ago
the graphics look crap and it dosent even look good from the trailer
killbot1996 2 years ago
From my experiences of the first game this doesn't look as promising as you would expect from a sequel.
pontusalv 2 years ago
doesn't really have good graphics and good gameplay
DJutubinator1221 2 years ago
Poor graphics
TheDerbake 2 years ago
the graphics dont look that good...
calucard85 2 years ago 14
@calucard85 every video on youtube that have to do with games graphics look terrible...it looks a whole lot better wen u play it
swoook 1 year ago
the graphics dont look that good
angelzerosly 2 years ago
this or wait for SC conviction
TheJuggernoob 2 years ago
I think the graphics are not that good compared to the likes of Assassin's creed and the Saboteur
abupassat 2 years ago
I hear the graphics suck and im for graphics. also i see no gameplay around. not sure what its exactly going to be like. Havent tried it out. cool theme but idk... thinkin about getting it.
gasher70 2 years ago
In the trailer I see no gameplay, just cinematics.
Siddhartaker 2 years ago
Same as most, the graphics look like a super Nintendo and I wouldn't waste my time with it unless you can prove to the contrary.
zak9624 2 years ago
last one was poor
antonioVillasboas 2 years ago
Poor graphic detail, snap shots and video clips very short, doesn't really have a build up.
CookiesandCream88 2 years ago
I agree, Graphics where poor but the story line and the actual game looks AMAZING.
6/10
Should I get it?
GabrielFtw96 2 years ago
Graphics in the Demo were Pretty bad
Good Concept but Bad Graphics
MrWoolin 2 years ago
didnt like the first one either - sorry nothing special about this game
medicinehed 2 years ago
graphic looks bad and old and this game is not as the level of ea games !!! it sucks just like NFS SHIFT "for PSP" very very bad animation
dragonriver123 2 years ago
graphics, animation, whole feel... looks a bit old and seen before...
harishabre 2 years ago
Graphysc is as nice as I expected
y0nuke 2 years ago
dont look as good aS i thougnt
lopoch117 2 years ago
graphics and the story line...why would we care if shanghi was attacked by a terrorist organization....? isn't their military in the 20-30 million or some huge number?
truewarrior93 2 years ago
listen guys the game looks great but the action of the figure looks laggy not smooth,the graphics r terrible
Slugkiller777 2 years ago
boring...
BastianBond 2 years ago
graphics
beck7547 2 years ago
i couldnt belive the first one didnt have the legacy controls, it ruined the game for me. if they added that control style it would have been kick ass.
sgtfuse 2 years ago
it looks like it might be too repetitive and just a really bad storyline, but it might be really amazing thats why i wasnt sure
WeekByWeekProduction 2 years ago
it looks like the storyline could start repeating itself..yknow..like just kill as many ppl as u can
and the graphics could be better
well thts just my opinion i dont know much about the game
but when it comes to a 2010 EA game
im putting my money down on bad company 2 :D
InkGraff 2 years ago
nver played it
saul2353 2 years ago
gameplay looks good but graphics look bad
sadnesscreek 2 years ago 2
storyline looks good but if those are the graffics they look bad
TheMurry7 2 years ago
would like to see more about the game
sxefanbitches 2 years ago
i wan't too see more but it seems like it's not a good game.. gears of war 2 is cind of better
lyllescott 2 years ago
idk :D
lTinitusl 2 years ago
dont like 3rd person games
sparry75 2 years ago
i dont hav army of 2 #1 but im not sure bout #2 cz is it 3rd person is it hard is it fun?
kloo321 2 years ago
the trailer dosn´t reveal too much... so i don´t know how this game will in the psp
alexitomp 2 years ago
Im not sure about this game. I played the first army of two and it really didnt make me want more. Playing alone was a joke and with a friend it was chalenging but got old fast. Looks cool though give ya that.
DrewMrR 2 years ago
wow... I know that this will be a great game, I loved the first and still play it from time to time. But this trailer was terrible. Almost enough to turn me off buying the game. Seriously... bloody awful trailer lads
sfanning80211 2 years ago
the game is seems very simplistic nothing interesting to show in this trailer. I see no plot or even a large hint of what the game is about. And from what I do see... it doesn't look good
M0G0S 2 years ago
I didn't see much gameplay there, but if it anything like the first it should be a good game. Not sure if I would buy it though, I don't see anything really that new and interesting.
przcjr 2 years ago
because penises are hairy
jakou3 2 years ago
very good point jakou3
xXiGotMoney2BlowXx 2 years ago
Why thank you kind stranger
jakou3 2 years ago
game play didn't like the first game, even though i thought it looked good. felt it tried to be a better coop version of gears of war but didn't make it. graphics are important to me that why i have a next gen console and a 52 inch sony. But, I don't care if the game looks awesome but the gameplay sucks their not getting my money. I look on my shelf and there are'nt any EA games on it. but that's just me.
tankman64 2 years ago
the graphics looks nothing special for 70 euros, e prefer to buy tekken 6
JOHNY19DIRTBOARDS 2 years ago
yeah same here the graphics are trash im all about the graphics of a game i like to feel im there and im pretty sure everyone can agree
sheekcannon 2 years ago
The graphics appear to be cell shaded. They are probably not going for the realistic approach to environments this time around.
DASGURGLINGEMU 2 years ago
the graphics still are not pached so thats why there not good fags... they need to tuch the game up alittle. if u like the first than get the second... 60 $ money well spent fellas
XxDaltono0 2 years ago
I cant believe how people now care so much about the precious graphics it can sway them to not buy something. If the worst computer on earth looked shiny and futuristic but the best one looked like a piece of poo would you buy the bad one because it looks better?
animus2323 2 years ago
HOPEFULLY IT COMES WITH MOUSE SUPPORT on PS3...
ccrooklyn 2 years ago
60 bucks is a lot for the same game
cchipman99 2 years ago
The graphics did not meet my expectations AT ALL.
Bryleyy 2 years ago
it looks just like the first one :(
mackerasta96 2 years ago
graphics not as good as the first
DeathBatTremolo 2 years ago
looks cool, but not done yet...graphics look like games from 2006...sorry
FreddyKay21 2 years ago
The Graphics dont look so good as I taught. I was expecting a big "Cant wait to get it"
private0941xx 2 years ago
the graphics dont look as good as the first game
MrColombian305 2 years ago
mmh... campaign in the 1st one was SHORT... dunno looks ok but im not setting my sights high
HammylthelHamster 2 years ago
Graphics Don't seem worth it and if there is as much coursing as the last game, then the game won't even be that fun to play.
mxkingpin91 2 years ago
lol trust me i played demo on the ps3 its way better then you think try it
i dare you!!!! =)
specter1555 2 years ago
well judging by the little story presented in the trailer it seems that the army of two will once again be fighting other mercenaries which really isn't too entertaining. If the story again starts to revolve around mercenary organizations gone rogue then i dont see much hope for the game's story. dont really care about the graphics and im sure they will be better than in the trailer since the graphics shown in the trailer does not even remotely compare to the original army of two.
Brusveen 2 years ago
graphics
HilariousStuff68 2 years ago
agree with JellyOnUrToast
Bikertimme 2 years ago
The graphics don't seem that good to be so late in the gaming age.
JellyOnUrToast 2 years ago
i agree with supersmashpotato
lupegonz1 2 years ago
classifying by the trailer i have to say it is shit, but tge first game... it was good..
Str3ss4do 2 years ago
because I realy didn't like the first one so I don't know what to expect
kiko10200 2 years ago
the graphics look pretty horrible... it looks like a ps2 game... and the story looks like it could be better... it just doesn't convince me that i should buy it..
supersmashpotato 2 years ago
story doesnt seem too interesting n the graphics dont look so appealing, looks like a one time play
rocky552 2 years ago 2
i'm not in to that kindeof game it seams funny witch the zoo thing at the end but otherwize it's like the first one
FrendlyGamer 2 years ago
Don't care bout the graphics story seems to be poor
kubadz 2 years ago 2
I was pumped until i saw the graphic Ive seen better graphics on Sega CD man..
DeputyDoNasty 2 years ago
I think I'm saying what everyone else here has said. The first game was amazing, this one looks good, but the graphics seem worse than the first one (which was made like, what, 3 years ago?)
TheFlamingIceCube 2 years ago
The graphics wasnt convincing.
stevenliew92 2 years ago
well, im hoping its not as cheezy as the first
angelodaBarbarian 2 years ago
look up the outher Trailer its v v funny. (I cant tell if the ppl are real in the outher Trailer or not) XD
Qwalkson 2 years ago
griafics not that good the first one was ok so idk
wasssabbe 2 years ago
Graphics seem to be inferior in the current standard of HD gaming. Although the gameplay seems fun and unique.
SonicShadow 2 years ago
ea games are way too in hollywoodstyle ..
which means they have good graphics, but story is nearly everytime fucked up ..
gameplay would be the same after 1 hour too ..
otherwise it would be too similar to the first game .. which is always shit .. sequels have to be different .. who would play the same, on and on ?!
Franzel86 2 years ago
well 1st the 1st game was boring and the game looks cool i dont know wat the story is about and the graphics is good
Adish456 2 years ago
Umm it has bad animations. These are not cool and not eased. But the one have been nice, and this looks pretty... umm, maybe it can be good.
But not sure.
plrusek 2 years ago
I DONT KNOW IF I WANT IT
12flyboy 2 years ago
too much stuff, too less clearness....
i have no clue what is happening at all...
strategax 2 years ago
jelly
AlphaMitts 2 years ago
The first game was to short. More missons! The grafics is okey i could been better! (you should have the possibility to fight against your friends NON Online)!
I got bored on the first like after i cleared all missions!
PoXy205 2 years ago
graghica hyave gone down, i didnt realy like the first one so im not sure
camzylamzy77 2 years ago
hmmm looks good, bit similar to the first, except i think the graphics have gone down a peg
GundamWolff 2 years ago
graphics graphics graphics!
hansmys 2 years ago
graphics dont look 2 great. and i wanted to c more
RinneganMidnight 2 years ago
well it looked in bad grafics and it doesnt look like realy hardcore y prefere mw2 because its hardcore and realistic but y played the first y liked it but not that mutch
tukosikario09 2 years ago
isnt da game a bit 2 short?
reservechelseakeeper 2 years ago 2
Game play in the first one was tedious. It was like you beat the game then you're done completely... nothing is different the next time you play.
Sarcasms10thdegree 2 years ago
Wasnt a big fan of the first one...
ARandomCanadian 2 years ago
everyone should be uncertain...there was not a single clip of gameplay...that's what matters not a little video preview -.- you can't want/not want a anything if you don't know what it is
DAOMAT 2 years ago
Looks Too Similar To The First One. And That Got Tedious At Times; Mainly Due To The Repetitive Natuer Of The Game Dynamics.
Also +1 For The 'I Have More Than One Friend Point'
LegendzPk 2 years ago
da hells wrong wit you people..its bomb! but everyones got opinions :D LOL
NemesisMarksman 2 years ago
well i wanted to see more, maybe i'll like if there will be a demo coming out...
cloud07s 2 years ago
graphics don't look very good and the first game was very short and the trailer didn't show much.
woodygrob 2 years ago 2
this ^^ makes sense and is waht i believe
supertojoe 2 years ago
First game was barely passable and very short, this trailer showed us nothing.
AKlover 2 years ago
The characters just dont feel like they did in the first one
RedGuardian73 2 years ago
in number 1 it looks more fun with the guns the action with this 1 just looks like its bomb after bomb no hard stuff when you have to think how to play the game
hooooahgunz 2 years ago
I loved the partner mecanics in the first game but i think they needed something more. It's great to play with one buddy but i have more then one friend. I would like it if they made the game same mecanics but as a squad of four or five. And each person woud be able to customize like in the firsts game campain. Image a team of masked gunmen that would be sick.
Bennyboy1213 2 years ago
not sure about this, first game was O.K. i thought it was a bit cheesy and that they cursed wayyy too much. Gameplay was great for co-ops, campaign had a bit of an unrealistic story and was very repetitive. Overall, I'd give the last one 3 out of 5 stars. Not sure about this one
AirsoftSoldier995 2 years ago
The graphics didn't get better, in fact, they look worse than the first game.
Fuzzyfoot88 2 years ago 2
you are so right
Eaze2009 2 years ago
cuzzzzzeee
IMNOGAY1 2 years ago
Only reason would be that the AI plays too much of a role.
PwnedYoAss 2 years ago
IDK cuz the graphics still dont look sooo good compared to all the other big hits that are coming out soon.
MANTRIS101 2 years ago
im not so sure cuz there were not so many missions in the last one and this will probally have the same so i dont kno just yet
MultiKeepitreal 2 years ago
not sure, not enough changes from the first game.
wesman3000 2 years ago
Dunno, first game was abit repetitive and lacked a solid story but was awesome in the co-op sense.
I just hope they wont do that kind of graphics in the actual game cus i see better graphics EVERYWHERE.
xxBlackmagixx 2 years ago
first i finished the gamne in about 2 or 3 days.i rented it in blockbuster and it was great at the begining but as levels passed i started to get a bit sick of the repetetive levels and the predictive story....is a game that has so much potential but has no story, no variation and the weapons just dont look real...i dont know if im buyin or again renting this one.....the last one was a waste
raflo2105 2 years ago
the storyline set looks great and i love any form of co-op to play with friends (esp split screen), but some of the visual effects in the trailer look dated, and the characters, even in the first Army of Two, were shallow-the variation in weapons was always an enhancement to the game tho!
Josh8882 2 years ago
The first trailer for army of two fooled me, and it was a real let down, want some proof that this is better.
DyNaCoR3ftw 2 years ago
im not dat big of a fan of army of 2 but this 1 looks pretty cool
couchpatatoe58 2 years ago
Can somebody tell me if i need to buy the first game to undersand the second game?? PLEASE!! thanks.
anotherLPfan 2 years ago
It's been said that you DON'T need to play the first to enjoy this one, but aren't you the least bit curious? :P
Ramsteinrig 2 years ago
Looks almost exactly the same, graphics still aren't the best. The guns layout was cool but the multiplayer and story were weak. They only like added flamethrowers :/
mitchpuop925 2 years ago
The controls for the first one were anit dodgy and the grahics don't look too good. but i still liked the concept of it and the gameplay.
MiidiaMenace 2 years ago
First person action is missing..but there are others that like the 3rd person i gues..But thats my opinion.. Create it so that you can choose between 3rd and 1st person..i think that would be a great achievement.
tijgerkat1 2 years ago
the first game weren't exactly more than just killing dudes, needs to be more variation
Arvidps3 2 years ago
i kinda liked the 1st one, but there was really only story bc the online sucked i thought. & i hate 3rd person :(
BROSClan 2 years ago
Graphics are pretty weak..
sevenvictories 2 years ago
mainly, because i played the first one and want to carry on the sequal...
Grunt121andtzm 2 years ago
I just don't want the game to be short, I want it to be a game that will take days for me to complete, and worth buying! But I still loved the first one
athrunsbabe 2 years ago
never played da first one
SjosefC13 2 years ago
weil deine mudder nach fisch stinkt
KnusprigerHannes 2 years ago
i agree with reedy911 but also the first one felt out of place and i havent played it just saw the ad and was thinking gears of war's crap ass cuzen even with a low price . in short make it worth my time and money i mean if im gonna pay 63.00 bucks on this it really better be good or that companys brand is out
kybui3 2 years ago
plan and simple the first game was a huge let down, the promise of the first games coop game play was kool but a huge let down in actual game play, the online portion should have been cut because it was so bad. the graphics for both games seem so second rate im suprise its from that big of a company. they really shot them selfs in the foot with this game
firesmurf50 2 years ago
i'm not sure bicause of the graffics... and the 1st game whas soooooo easy. it whasn't even fun to play anymore... but whel see.
GameDoggyDogg 2 years ago
i think the ruined this one they changed the voices graphics and they both got tattoos and some of salems old tattoos r now gone might rent it for a day to get the achievements but to buy it no way
h3m1r4m 2 years ago
army of two was so short and the online was all messed up it felt like if it was laggy. i dont know about this game i'll probably get it for psp.
VHBGLJ 2 years ago 3
it was messed up. i had buddies buy the game to check out the game and it sucked with the connection problems
Tebaz8584 2 years ago
i'll definetely buy this game as long as its not as short as the last one
branden638 2 years ago
WAY too much swearing in the first one and the graphics look crappy.
xXvfemanXx 2 years ago
the first one was a little short but it was awesome and blew my balls away...
fatmanandschizard 2 years ago