Added: 2 years ago
From: Machinimadotcom
Views: 7,442
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (337)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • because there is a bar above u telling you your gun is going to over heat

  • The story in the last one was weak. I enjoyed it like one who is a fan of the Action shooter. But it didnt impress me The aggro system was flawed the AI paid just as much attention to the low aggro as the high, so it was almost like penning you into a strategy mindset only to contradict yourself by the very actions of the enemies this is supposed to work against. so if they reworked that feature a bit among other less bothersome quirks it should be fun, But I'm NOT SURE

  • Why are people not sure about buying this game JUST because of the visuals. It's stupid.I'm just not sure if i'll like it or not.

  • dont know much adout it just yet gonna keep looking

  • the graphics r bad

  • graphics :(

    

  • It hadn't a good story

  • can you even lean up against walls like rainbow 6

  • the first i playec this one it got too boring too fast but ill have to play it again

    

  • It looks pretty much the same as the first one, but with diff levels..

  • doesnt seem to fun to me COD 5 has way more action and just looking at the trailer made me buy it this game it doesnt look so fun i mean there are millions of games saying like some world will get bombed this game is one of them i dont like same games

  • The plot doesn't seem good. Don't get me wrong I loved the first one, but it just seems like they rushed to make a sequel. I hope I'm wrong...

  • The plot doesn't seem good. Don't get me wrong I loved the first one, but it just seems like they rushed to make a sequel. I hope I'm wrong...

  • the grafic is not good

    

  • dudus the game have a good grafhic ... just watch that video

    /watch?v=6VY5usiBPuc

  • graphics and effecs looks not good

  • have not played the game yet but it looks good

  • graphics are week

  • because you like penis

  • it looks like it would be alot of fun because of the way the people shoot and the amount of things you can do on it. But I'm afraid the story mode will be to easy or not long enough. Because me and my brother want a co-op game that we can play offline together with. And we are kind of stuck between resident evil 5 or army of 2 40th day. Because army of 2 seems funner but resident evil seems harder and longer. Could you do a review for each. Thx for your help.

  • @sdbmontage army of two is supposed to be a six hour co-op and their is not much of a change in story to online, so you can play with your bro and with people online :) hope that helps

  • game is ok but it should have been longer. this one seemed shorter than the first.

  • I dont see anything that would link it to the first game and the graphics look worse then the first. The best part of these kinda games is the gameplay and story and looks like this was just thrown together to make more money

  • graphics don't look good

  • Metar Gear Solid for PS3 came out in 2008 and makes almost every other game graphics look terrible!! come on is 2010 show it..

  • @LiuCubanito Metal******

  • Since when the hell do graphics matter?

    I dunno, it looks too redundant, too much of the same cool tricks just over and over again.

    The feint death and the fake hostage and surrendering thing.

  • The graphics look like they could be better and the first one's trailer looks a lot better.

  • I dont want to play the first 1 again it was soooooo boring

  • ok just get normal army of two for x box 360 awesome game funn to good story

  • i just dont get the whole consept

  • the graphic is not that good also the game play doesnt look so good to me ;/

  • I dont like the graphics, and the gameplay does'nt look to good.. and bad story .. wtf?

  • need more info

  • i rebuted my system for nothing becuase i thought it would fix the playsatation error and i like to play fallout 3 but i lost that memory and want a new game to play story mode and not so sure abou this game

  • the graphics seem crappy well not crappy but not good

  • Played the demo. I'm not that thrilled. I think I liked the first one better, honestly.

  • graphics is not that bad but explosion and smoke are worst

  • graphics and animation dont seem very good.

  • graphics and animation dont seem very good.

  • graphics arent good. it doesnt look interesting. and it doesnt seem like there.

    s a story

  • i dunno.. doesnt seem to be any point to it. looks just like a bunch of guns to me

  • the trailer had no gameplay or anything exciteing, looks like another war game

  • the graphics look crap and it dosent even look good from the trailer

  • From my experiences of the first game this doesn't look as promising as you would expect from a sequel.

  • doesn't really have good graphics and good gameplay

  • Poor graphics

  • the graphics dont look that good...

  • @calucard85 every video on youtube that have to do with games graphics look terrible...it looks a whole lot better wen u play it

  • the graphics dont look that good

  • this or wait for SC conviction

  • I think the graphics are not that good compared to the likes of Assassin's creed and the Saboteur

  • I hear the graphics suck and im for graphics. also i see no gameplay around. not sure what its exactly going to be like. Havent tried it out. cool theme but idk... thinkin about getting it.

  • In the trailer I see no gameplay, just cinematics.

  • Same as most, the graphics look like a super Nintendo and I wouldn't waste my time with it unless you can prove to the contrary.

  • last one was poor

  • Poor graphic detail, snap shots and video clips very short, doesn't really have a build up.

  • I agree, Graphics where poor but the story line and the actual game looks AMAZING.

    6/10

    Should I get it?

  • Graphics in the Demo were Pretty bad

    Good Concept but Bad Graphics

  • didnt like the first one either - sorry nothing special about this game

  • graphic looks bad and old and this game is not as the level of ea games !!! it sucks just like NFS SHIFT "for PSP" very very bad animation

  • graphics, animation, whole feel... looks a bit old and seen before...

  • Graphysc is as nice as I expected

  • dont look as good aS i thougnt

  • graphics and the story line...why would we care if shanghi was attacked by a terrorist organization....? isn't their military in the 20-30 million or some huge number?

  • listen guys the game looks great but the action of the figure looks laggy not smooth,the graphics r terrible

  • boring...

  • graphics

  • i couldnt belive the first one didnt have the legacy controls, it ruined the game for me. if they added that control style it would have been kick ass.

  • it looks like it might be too repetitive and just a really bad storyline, but it might be really amazing thats why i wasnt sure

  • it looks like the storyline could start repeating itself..yknow..like just kill as many ppl as u can

    and the graphics could be better

    well thts just my opinion i dont know much about the game

    but when it comes to a 2010 EA game

    im putting my money down on bad company 2 :D

  • nver played it

  • gameplay looks good but graphics look bad

  • storyline looks good but if those are the graffics they look bad

  • would like to see more about the game

  • i wan't too see more but it seems like it's not a good game.. gears of war 2 is cind of better

  • idk :D

  • dont like 3rd person games

  • i dont hav army of 2 #1 but im not sure bout #2 cz is it 3rd person is it hard is it fun?

  • the trailer dosn´t reveal too much... so i don´t know how this game will in the psp

  • Im not sure about this game. I played the first army of two and it really didnt make me want more. Playing alone was a joke and with a friend it was chalenging but got old fast. Looks cool though give ya that.

  • wow... I know that this will be a great game, I loved the first and still play it from time to time. But this trailer was terrible. Almost enough to turn me off buying the game. Seriously... bloody awful trailer lads

  • the game is seems very simplistic nothing interesting to show in this trailer. I see no plot or even a large hint of what the game is about. And from what I do see... it doesn't look good

  • I didn't see much gameplay there, but if it anything like the first it should be a good game. Not sure if I would buy it though, I don't see anything really that new and interesting.

  • because penises are hairy

  • very good point jakou3

  • Why thank you kind stranger

  • game play didn't like the first game, even though i thought it looked good. felt it tried to be a better coop version of gears of war but didn't make it. graphics are important to me that why i have a next gen console and a 52 inch sony. But, I don't care if the game looks awesome but the gameplay sucks their not getting my money. I look on my shelf and there are'nt any EA games on it. but that's just me.

  • the graphics looks nothing special for 70 euros, e prefer to buy tekken 6

  • yeah same here the graphics are trash im all about the graphics of a game i like to feel im there and im pretty sure everyone can agree

  • The graphics appear to be cell shaded. They are probably not going for the realistic approach to environments this time around.

  • the graphics still are not pached so thats why there not good fags... they need to tuch the game up alittle. if u like the first than get the second... 60 $ money well spent fellas

  • I cant believe how people now care so much about the precious graphics it can sway them to not buy something. If the worst computer on earth looked shiny and futuristic but the best one looked like a piece of poo would you buy the bad one because it looks better?

  • HOPEFULLY IT COMES WITH MOUSE SUPPORT on PS3...

  • 60 bucks is a lot for the same game

  • The graphics did not meet my expectations AT ALL.

  • it looks just like the first one :(

  • graphics not as good as the first

  • looks cool, but not done yet...graphics look like games from 2006...sorry

  • The Graphics dont look so good as I taught. I was expecting a big "Cant wait to get it"

  • the graphics dont look as good as the first game

  • mmh... campaign in the 1st one was SHORT... dunno looks ok but im not setting my sights high

  • Graphics Don't seem worth it and if there is as much coursing as the last game, then the game won't even be that fun to play.

  • lol trust me i played demo on the ps3 its way better then you think try it

    i dare you!!!! =)

  • well judging by the little story presented in the trailer it seems that the army of two will once again be fighting other mercenaries which really isn't too entertaining. If the story again starts to revolve around mercenary organizations gone rogue then i dont see much hope for the game's story. dont really care about the graphics and im sure they will be better than in the trailer since the graphics shown in the trailer does not even remotely compare to the original army of two.

  • graphics

  • agree with JellyOnUrToast

  • The graphics don't seem that good to be so late in the gaming age.

  • i agree with supersmashpotato

  • classifying by the trailer i have to say it is shit, but tge first game... it was good..

  • because I realy didn't like the first one so I don't know what to expect

  • the graphics look pretty horrible... it looks like a ps2 game... and the story looks like it could be better... it just doesn't convince me that i should buy it..

  • story doesnt seem too interesting n the graphics dont look so appealing, looks like a one time play

  • i'm not in to that kindeof game it seams funny witch the zoo thing at the end but otherwize it's like the first one

  • Don't care bout the graphics story seems to be poor

  • I was pumped until i saw the graphic Ive seen better graphics on Sega CD man..

  • I think I'm saying what everyone else here has said. The first game was amazing, this one looks good, but the graphics seem worse than the first one (which was made like, what, 3 years ago?)

  • The graphics wasnt convincing.

  • well, im hoping its not as cheezy as the first

  • look up the outher Trailer its v v funny. (I cant tell if the ppl are real in the outher Trailer or not) XD

  • griafics not that good the first one was ok so idk

  • Graphics seem to be inferior in the current standard of HD gaming. Although the gameplay seems fun and unique.

  • ea games are way too in hollywoodstyle ..

    which means they have good graphics, but story is nearly everytime fucked up ..

    gameplay would be the same after 1 hour too ..

    otherwise it would be too similar to the first game .. which is always shit .. sequels have to be different .. who would play the same, on and on ?!

  • well 1st the 1st game was boring and the game looks cool i dont know wat the story is about and the graphics is good

  • Umm it has bad animations. These are not cool and not eased. But the one have been nice, and this looks pretty... umm, maybe it can be good.

    But not sure.

  • I DONT KNOW IF I WANT IT

  • too much stuff, too less clearness....

    i have no clue what is happening at all...

  • jelly

  • The first game was to short. More missons! The grafics is okey i could been better! (you should have the possibility to fight against your friends NON Online)!

    I got bored on the first like after i cleared all missions!

  • graghica hyave gone down, i didnt realy like the first one so im not sure

  • hmmm looks good, bit similar to the first, except i think the graphics have gone down a peg

  • graphics graphics graphics!

  • graphics dont look 2 great. and i wanted to c more

  • well it looked in bad grafics and it doesnt look like realy hardcore y prefere mw2 because its hardcore and realistic but y played the first y liked it but not that mutch

  • isnt da game a bit 2 short?

  • Game play in the first one was tedious. It was like you beat the game then you're done completely... nothing is different the next time you play.

  • Wasnt a big fan of the first one...

  • everyone should be uncertain...there was not a single clip of gameplay...that's what matters not a little video preview -.- you can't want/not want a anything if you don't know what it is

  • Looks Too Similar To The First One. And That Got Tedious At Times; Mainly Due To The Repetitive Natuer Of The Game Dynamics.

    Also +1 For The 'I Have More Than One Friend Point'

  • da hells wrong wit you people..its bomb! but everyones got opinions :D LOL

  • well i wanted to see more, maybe i'll like if there will be a demo coming out...

  • graphics don't look very good and the first game was very short and the trailer didn't show much.

  • this ^^ makes sense and is waht i believe

  • First game was barely passable and very short, this trailer showed us nothing.

  • The characters just dont feel like they did in the first one

  • in number 1 it looks more fun with the guns the action with this 1 just looks like its bomb after bomb no hard stuff when you have to think how to play the game

  • I loved the partner mecanics in the first game but i think they needed something more. It's great to play with one buddy but i have more then one friend. I would like it if they made the game same mecanics but as a squad of four or five. And each person woud be able to customize like in the firsts game campain. Image a team of masked gunmen that would be sick.

  • not sure about this, first game was O.K. i thought it was a bit cheesy and that they cursed wayyy too much. Gameplay was great for co-ops, campaign had a bit of an unrealistic story and was very repetitive. Overall, I'd give the last one 3 out of 5 stars. Not sure about this one

  • The graphics didn't get better, in fact, they look worse than the first game.

  • you are so right

  • cuzzzzzeee

  • Only reason would be that the AI plays too much of a role.

  • IDK cuz the graphics still dont look sooo good compared to all the other big hits that are coming out soon.

  • im not so sure cuz there were not so many missions in the last one and this will probally have the same so i dont kno just yet

  • not sure, not enough changes from the first game.

  • Dunno, first game was abit repetitive and lacked a solid story but was awesome in the co-op sense.

    I just hope they wont do that kind of graphics in the actual game cus i see better graphics EVERYWHERE.

  • first i finished the gamne in about 2 or 3 days.i rented it in blockbuster and it was great at the begining but as levels passed i started to get a bit sick of the repetetive levels and the predictive story....is a game that has so much potential but has no story, no variation and the weapons just dont look real...i dont know if im buyin or again renting this one.....the last one was a waste

  • the storyline set looks great and i love any form of co-op to play with friends (esp split screen), but some of the visual effects in the trailer look dated, and the characters, even in the first Army of Two, were shallow-the variation in weapons was always an enhancement to the game tho!

  • The first trailer for army of two fooled me, and it was a real let down, want some proof that this is better.

  • im not dat big of a fan of army of 2 but this 1 looks pretty cool

  • Can somebody tell me if i need to buy the first game to undersand the second game?? PLEASE!! thanks.

  • It's been said that you DON'T need to play the first to enjoy this one, but aren't you the least bit curious? :P

  • Looks almost exactly the same, graphics still aren't the best. The guns layout was cool but the multiplayer and story were weak. They only like added flamethrowers :/

  • The controls for the first one were anit dodgy and the grahics don't look too good. but i still liked the concept of it and the gameplay.

  • First person action is missing..but there are others that like the 3rd person i gues..But thats my opinion.. Create it so that you can choose between 3rd and 1st person..i think that would be a great achievement.

  • the first game weren't exactly more than just killing dudes, needs to be more variation

  • i kinda liked the 1st one, but there was really only story bc the online sucked i thought. & i hate 3rd person :(

  • Graphics are pretty weak..

  • mainly, because i played the first one and want to carry on the sequal...

  • I just don't want the game to be short, I want it to be a game that will take days for me to complete, and worth buying! But I still loved the first one

  • never played da first one

  • weil deine mudder nach fisch stinkt

  • i agree with reedy911 but also the first one felt out of place and i havent played it just saw the ad and was thinking gears of war's crap ass cuzen even with a low price . in short make it worth my time and money i mean if im gonna pay 63.00 bucks on this it really better be good or that companys brand is out

  • plan and simple the first game was a huge let down, the promise of the first games coop game play was kool but a huge let down in actual game play, the online portion should have been cut because it was so bad. the graphics for both games seem so second rate im suprise its from that big of a company. they really shot them selfs in the foot with this game

  • i'm not sure bicause of the graffics... and the 1st game whas soooooo easy. it whasn't even fun to play anymore... but whel see.

  • i think the ruined this one they changed the voices graphics and they both got tattoos and some of salems old tattoos r now gone might rent it for a day to get the achievements but to buy it no way

  • army of two was so short and the online was all messed up it felt like if it was laggy. i dont know about this game i'll probably get it for psp.

  • it was messed up. i had buddies buy the game to check out the game and it sucked with the connection problems

  • i'll definetely buy this game as long as its not as short as the last one

  • WAY too much swearing in the first one and the graphics look crappy.

  • the first one was a little short but it was awesome and blew my balls away...