Let me invent a stupid device, call it "The [First & Last Name] Engine", create a wikipedia page about it, and throw around statistics and the words efficiency and new technology!
The gear looks like its going so fast its skipping teeth, wouldn't this have an effect on combustion, timing as well as efficiency? This engine while unique does look far from super efficient, but keep working on it Mabye you'll improve it.O_o
A piston driven pump is not the most efficient nor effective. A simple GEAR DRIVEN displacement is far better. They have been in use for 100 years, only 2 moving parts, no reciprocating assembly. This model is very similar to antique "jack pumps" used om American farms in the 1890-1920 era. Sorry -
what the hell is this? is this for real? this has to be one of the least efficient designs i have ever seen! just listen to how loud it is, noise = lose of power
What this guy isn't taking into account, is that a crankshaft is 100% efficient. The thing that needs to be overcome is the fluid friction(oil/coolant pumping, wind resistance, bearings and seals, lubricated sliding surfaces). then we'll have a perpetual motion engine, which would be much more efficient at converting fuel into power.
1crazyfocker :,,,,,is tol right..! This will not work and is not efficent at the end of the stroke you lose power and moshion with the up and down of the gears, bad idea not buyable,
@johnnnyreb51 is that made of metal, and ready to be put in your application? i dont think so. judging it at its point in development right now would be dumb.
The diameter of a piston is pi D to it's friction surface whereas the surface area of the piston increases proportionally to the diameter. pi r^2
This should tell you that as the piston increases in size the friction caused by the moving of the piston becomes relatively less as the diameter increases. Ergo one of the basic assumptions you are using is wrong. Please redo your math.
it is a gear nothing more, its not your idea, its over 100 years old, a crankshaft is the most efficant way to transmit power from a piston to rotation. this is 10% to 20% less efficant then a stanard crank shaft. 2nd just because you think its better does not mean it is. you cant just say its 50% more efficant on gas, its not, you are a lier a cheat and a theif. its opsolete. and if you did try to use it in an engine it would work for 30 sec b4 the force at the end stroke rips the pinion off!
@MrxCoockieMonster A crankshaft is not more the most efficient way to transmit power from a piston to rotation. The best way is no bearing at all between pistons and a rotating shaft as you may see in one of my videos at youtube. I manufacture this principle as the first clean water hydraulic motor or first total oil-free high pressure water pump at Wolfhat Industries. It may interest you.
@InventorWillimczik okay, heres a little schooling for you. a piston is linear movement. a shaft/wheel is rotational movement, in order to connect the two some sort of linkage is needed. and by stating "the best way is no bearings at all" is an incomplete thought, as you leave out the most important part the linkage. this is simple physics, and first year mechanical engineering, the crank is the most efficient form for linking a piston to a shaft. give a name of a linkage thats better. you cant
@1crazyfocker Be careful what you are writing. You should first educate yourself by going to WolfhartIndustries…where the kinematik is explained - by a physicist!!
By the way; everybody can buy it. Pistons – disk and shaft are one part – without any bearing between them. Your “linkage” is a simple disk. It is simple physics.
@InventorWillimczik and being explained by a physicist or a mechanical engineer is one thing, since they know what they are talking about. how ever you dont seem to even understand whats going on. the topic is about changing linear motion to rotary motion. this is not about spamming for an outdated over 100 yr old rotary type engine is more efficient then a 35% efficient piston engine. but what is the most efficient way to convert linear to rotational energy, which is the simple crank.
mate you're a fricken idiot! this will never work as an engine! i.e. a device that will do rotational/mechanical work/produce any power via an output shaft! it may work as a pump! but that is not an engine! get it right. also your wrong in pretty much every comment you've written on this video...stick to lego technic buddy!
@macatac234 I am one of the very few inventors who manufacture his own inventions (Wolfhart Industries). I invented and developed the first clear water hydraulic motor or first oil-free high pressure pump. I never claimed it is an “engine”.
I will congratulate you as soon you invention comes to the market, but as long this is not the case you should be a little more cautious. Only idiots use foul language and diffamations.
@1crazyfocker well first of all your nonsense about it driving a fly wheel is crap because this would probably driving a fly wheel any way. second gears have been invented but this guy patented this intended use therefore it is still a great innovation. and i am currently designing my own engine and know for a fact that your big fat trolling as has no proof especially since the only username you could think of was 1crazyfocker! try being a bit more respectable next time idiot.
@thepeoplesamaricuh HA HA HA... wow why not try reading what i post. i never said anything about a "fly wheel" in any of my post, now others have tho, but not me. and as for the trolling lets see, i dont call anyone names, I dont insult anyone, I use facts that can be backed up by anyone that can use a search engine, or has completed the 5th grade. and this "innovation" was just that when it was first patentes over 100 yrs ago for this "intended use", -cont-
so this is over 100yrs old invented by someone else, and it was proven even then how inefficient it was. and all it takes is 5 to 10 minutes to look up facts, and a want to improves ones self, which trolls just dont ever seem to want to do. and as for my user name....HA HA HA HA next time you troll try useing something of relevance instead of your jealousy of usernames and other ppls quotes. nothing is funnier then a fail troll..HA HA HA HA
being able to power a model and have it work is not the same as being able to have a model PRODUCE power. sure you can spin the intended output of this thing you've created but i highly doubt that it would be able to produce power.
This "rod" with 20 minutes of running a scheme of work considered "light " will burst. If not, the vibration of this engine will be immense and unbearable. Imagine you using your car with an engine of these. Can they please, invent something that does not use gasoline. Do something really innovative, let the era of "piston" in the 19th century ...
Sorry, there is the conventional piston engine type,...Or the Wankel rotary engine, Both of these engines can produce massive amounts of Hp and Tq. Eg. A big block 9.0 Lt Hemi, supercharged running on 90% nitro makes 10,000 hp at 9500 RPM, A Quad rotor Wankel engine used in the 24 hr le mans is only 2600 cc but is capable of 20000 rpm and produces 700 + hp, Until a similar engine has the capabilities to come close to any of these, The world will continue to use these two combustion engines.
@8182junebug Nothing in my opinion.It might make half a cycle and then stop.He seems to think that turning the crankshaft is the same as the pistons driving the mechanism.This is a good case of putting the cart before the horses.
where's the combustion ? The engine is supposed to work by the pistons driving the crank - not the othe way araound as in your model. You can already see gimbal lock starting to happen at high revs.
How could you possibly balance this? I see the inventor trying to hold it steady with a small model, with no piston or con-rod attached. All this vibration would put excessive wear on the gears and bearings. How long can you run this basic set up died4hislove?
SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE (PART 4) will soon be uploaded... Here shows the idea on how the vibration is minimum...( pls. subscribe so I can inform it to you later)
Silent gears such as spur gear will solve the problem.Also, the unique guide system that I invented and proper lubrication will cushion the mechanism to make it silent...
its defintly a very interesting machine but i would like to see how it would auchly work on lets say a moter cycle or a dyno test to see the horse power and torqe
i have a few questions like whats the total life span of the gear teeth? and also is there a certine speed where the ring becomes unstable and starts bouncing?
this is a great concept for a r/c car;but in reality,there are too many wear areas that it would not last long; and the tourque produced is very minimal.you would have too build a motor twice the size of a passenger car too pull it!!!
Is the central "ring" is pushed to make a gear coupling tight? if not, any effort on the central shaft and gears will slip and the central ring will be bouncing without any work
This will never work. Once fired the center gear will bounce around like a pinball since it is free floating. You would have to hold the center gear firmly against the crank gears for this to work and since it can't be held in that manner because it would bind it just won't work.
your not the brightest fish in the ocean died4hislove. again the power from an engine comes from the pistons not the crank.your crank wouldnt move once power comes from pistons
once again you're videos do not show how this motor can be put into a practical use. that gear is just flopping aound inside of what ever that is. seems like you have too much time with your errector set
That's the super efficient bouncing around deely bob with the stripped out teeth. The only Super efficient thing here is this guys imagination and or sense of humor. This guy laughs his ass off every time somebody says they're impressed with his " idea ". ROTFL . The teeth in the yellow gear look like they're made from melting "Silly Putty". LOL again!
Why have you titled it super efficient? looks more like a piece of shit. It's noisy, It creates a large amount of friction/vibration compared to a normal crankshaft. Please tell me why you call this efficient?
tell me have you ever heard a "normal motors internals exposed in a MODEL they are how did you put it "It's noisy, It creates a large amount of friction/vibration" all motors do why do you think the break the reason that you don't feel the vibrations is because they have been balanced and are bolted to a steel frame. yet again i say this is just this guys model not the finished working motor do you think any motor run smooth at concept?
So I am still wondering why your still pursuing this dead end design. Explain how your going to overcome the huge amount of friction this gear drive produces? let alone it almost destroys itself while in operation.
It's an interesting design, I'd like to see one that was balanced and had a piston attached. Better yet, a working model with at least 2 pistons horizontally opposed. I want to see that it will actually work SMOOTHLY (important in today's passenger car engines).
The problem I see is, that without some sort of retaining piece in the center of the oval to keep the gear in the oval track, the 'real working version' of this concept, made obviously from steel or an alloy of some sort, would wreck itself in a very short time, stripping the teeth off of the gear or out of the track, and potentially cracking the oval shaped gear rack. The polymer versions get the general idea across, but I'd like to see what would happen even to an aluminum version.
You obviously haven't seen the project on paper, there are pistons, not just moving parts. You're right, he hasn't invented anything, he just revolutionized (hopefully in a good way) the internal combustion piston engine.
I did not included the pistons on this video because my main purposes are to shown how the system vibrates when carrying heavy loads and to show how the system functions at higher rpm. It was not my purpose here to show to you the exact design... Since you cannot prove your point..therefore your words returns to you...
The system shown was not yet balanced and the internal oval gear's weight is about 3/4 kilogram... My purpose is to show it's vibration amount at approximately 3000 rpm... If the weight of the oval gear is reduced and proper balance is applied , minimal vibration can be seen...
I have to agree with jiro9cuts0001, you need some sort of retaining piece to hold it in place, but that's next to impossible as the piece would have to locate itself in the opposite side of the track to stop vibration. Perhaps, if the gear in the center was an oval shape and not a circle, it might work a little better. Food for thought.
I fail to see how this is going to make it more efficient. If there is so much side load on the pistons eating power why not make the connecting rod longer? now you just have an extra piece reciprocating back and forth and more rotating mass.
go to the link that says 50% less fuel consumption and you'll see that i was saying EXACTLY what you are saying dude. nice to see somebody agree with me for a change
lol, I see modesty isn't your most obvious virtue now is it? but wait, if you speak about IQ, I must tell you, it isn't as reliable and has long been thought of as mearly an aproximation. now, if you've achieved anything on your own, then that's another story. anyways, I PM'd you the link, just so we can agree on the same subject as we currently are, but have more people read it. cuz please, the YouTube community is in desperate need of some enlightment (says the stubborn atheist)
i can't belive you got a thumbs down! it's so irritating to see how all these 40 year old mothers end up looking at this and just thumbing down every smart comment they see cuz they just buy into everything the video tells them, how ridiculous!... im with you all the way, this looks too positive to be true, this is NOT what it claims to be. fucking jerks arrghh
That looks like some pretty destructive vibration. How is this an improvement on the traditional connecting rod/crankshaft combination if it's got all that unbalanced weight slamming back and forth?
this is interesting it will be smoother running when it comes ti the crank but you will need to get a speed reducer and all the parts will have to be balanced.a reducer cuz you will have high rpms but no torque or power. and balanced cuz it will be bouncing a lot . have ing a balanced motor will give you more rpms and less fuel consumption. good idea becuz it is just like a rotary motor but adapted for the piston engine
Ok look first off to put that in a car you would need some serious motor mounts plus something to deaden the vibration and another thing to make a motor big enough to power a car that would throw the front end all over the place so back to the drawing board
demo is useless and uninformative: there are no loads being applied as they would be in the real world which would snap teeth off the gears: do the math! it is also insipid to claim that this complex motion is easier to balance than a conventional piston engine, and negating the complete redesign of the supporting engine block.
OK your idea is good because there is less friction going on in that system.... but your engine wont work the way you think it will...your engine will be weak were the piston rod would connect to your gear...not only that it will be harder to balance your engine and it would be hard to time your engine when each piston will fire at top dead center....also all that gearing will wear out from grinding and eventually the engine would be no good...sorry dude your idea sucks...
The unique GUIDE SYSTEM that I invented is the key to the durability,timing,etc... of this new system. Balancing this system is easier compare to a rotary engine.
do you know what it weighs while its moving? what about when the gear is cast iron? also your test setup backwards, u need to apply force to the piston not the crankshaft to spin the gear, when force is applied that "unique" gear will jump right off the crankshaft. hold the crankshaft tight and push down on the piston and watch what happens
Please don't ask me such simple questions. You are saying this things because you don't see yet the UNIQUE GUIDE SYSTEM that i invented (confidential).
i think i might work better if you put two of them crossed over ,one horzotaly, and the other vertical and just keep crossing them when more pistons are placed
The inventors of the airplane were also criticized and being ridiculed then(people says that their idea will not work ,but look now, we are benefiting a lot their invention).
that is both unrelated and simply not a good enough reason for why this idea will work. from wheat i (and a few others) have seen the crank is always driven by a motor whats going to keep the ring gear seated and spinning the right direction on the crank gear?
Vibration can be solved by employing opposite movements (example:two oval gears moving opposite directions). We can also solve vibration using balancers/bobweights,etc... Since this is very efficient, we can lessen it's piston stroke to minimize vibration.
i dont know all information about this engin so i cant says if it were efficient or not but maybe be a probleme hum ... it really chake hard so how long it can run without any mechanical failure ???
So you have rewritten the Newtonian laws of physics and solved the effects of inertia, friction, impact loads, gear design, assembly design, material selection,etc.. You will go down in history as the greatest physicist that ever lived. Why stop with just this engine? The truth is I think you should have spent that time in school.
I did not stop with just this engine. In fact this mechanism is the basic of my many inventions. I invented a unique robot legs(you may view it soon through the youtube), most efficient bicycle crank arm system, a gas compressor that can save 30 percent electricity,
I have Maleve "Internal Combustion Engines" published 1945. I know exactly what you mean. You want to convert the sinusoidal motion of the piston into a square wave to increase the area in the indicator diagram page 5. That is a worthwhile thing to do but you will have to come up with another mechanism to do it. You are ignoring the high piston acceleration at top and bottom of the stroke. Piston acceleration is a fundamental problem with crankshafts. Rotary engines do not have that problem.
Ive'd studied this mechanism for almost 12 years and you are saying to me that I am ignoring the high piston acceleration at Top to Bottom of the stroke ... I think you should understand that I already tackled and solved the effects of inertia,friction, impact loads, gear design,assembly design, material selection,etc...The unique GUIDE SYSTEM of this mechanism is the key to solve all these problems. Sorry but i cannot disclose to you the information regarding this guide system.
I think what you are trying to say is the piston motion in your engine effectively stops at top dead center for a short period of time, accelerates rapidly down the bore and slams to a stop at the bottom of the bore for another short period of time. Therefore it spends relatively less time going down the bore. This, in theory, is the same as a cam engine. Good luck getting that to work.
I can prove to you by models, examples or principles that the piston will not slam but i think you will not still be convinced. I think the best thing to do now is to have a running engine.And that's my objective. Thank you for your constructive criticism anyway.
Delayed travel?? What ever are you talking about? You are making up terms as you go along. There is no stinking "delayed travel". Baloney. The piston starts going down immediately after ignition results in max BMEP. Expansion is over in 90 CS degrees. Get Fayette's Taylor's book "The Internal-Combustion Engine. The heat going into the cooling system has nothing to do with the heat going out of the exhaust.
Study the piston's percentage of stroke for every 10 degrees crank turn from TDC to BDC( Internal Combustion Engine by V.L. Maleev 2nd edition), or try to compute the circular distance of say 1.5 inch radius crank arm (circular distance from TDC to BDC ) and analyze it's circular distance compare to it's 3 inches piston stroke(notice that they have different distance travel ) .Then you will know what I mean.
Engine friction consumes only a small portion of the energy in a gallon of gas. 50% goes out the tailpipe in the form of waste heat. Another 20% is dissipated by the cooling system. Mechanical efficiency including all forms of friction is less than 5%. What should be focused on is the 50% waste energy in the exhaust. Search youtube and the the world wide web for turbo compound.
One main reason why more heat energy goes out the tailpipe is the 36 percent delayed travel of piston. In a normal engine the piston's travel is delayed by 36 percent(from TDC to BDC).By this, the gases remain in contact with the cooling walls for a relatively long time & more of the heat energy will be lost to the engine frame,jacket, and tailpipe. This new mechanism can greatly reduce piston's delayed travel(I can prove it). This advantage alone will result to a super-efficient engine.
how will this affect the time it takes for trhe air/fuel mixture to combust? will combustion start while the piston in your system is slightly before TDC, possibly causing the engine to run backwards?( or not at all) Ignition timing will have to be set very to close to TDC in order to minimize this situation but won't that in effect shorten the time the mixture has to burn before the piston begins to fall? Won't that decrease power?
Engines with crank shafts have weights on them that provide centrifugal force that keeps the engine spinning in a continuous direction. Ignition to the fuel/air mixture is introduced 20-35 degrees before TDC. In your design if the engine has no crank shaft how will you provide the momentum the engine needs to operate? Also if the piston does not hesitate at TDC the mixture will not provide trhe same amount of force to your piston as is provided in a conventional recip engine.
All you have shown is a mechanism. No pistons, no connecting rods, no valves, no nothing. All of these parts enter into the balance of an internal combustion engine. Until you build a complete engine and run it you can not say it is super efficient or can you say "vibration is minimal". The clattering sound of the mechanism is a clue.
If an engine design can meet the accepted principles/requirements to be a very efficient engine,the result of that design on actual will be very efficient.This new design meets the requirements needed such as:
1. Proper position of input forces to the crankshaft. 2. Elimination of large amount of friction (side thrust) between the cylinder wall and piston. 3.reduced delayed travel of piston by more than 20 percent.
The clattering sound can be solved by using spur gear & a unique guide system.
There is nothing about this engine that is "super efficient". High efficiency comes from the combustion chamber and not the mechanism that converts linear motion to rotary motion. The only thing super about this engine is the vibration.
Regarding vibration,I think your wrong because based from the actual model shown with the small gear having approximate speed of 3000 RPM and the oval gear's weight about 3/4 kilogram (heavy weight of the oval gear was intentional so we can observe how this
Please watch also, THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( Part 3).
died4hislove 2 weeks ago
Let me invent a stupid device, call it "The [First & Last Name] Engine", create a wikipedia page about it, and throw around statistics and the words efficiency and new technology!
MTLAccord 1 month ago
Your title is misleading. You misspelled the word "inefficient."
Winstonsicle 1 month ago
Somebody might benefit from adoption of the KISS principle.. You're halfway there already; Now it's time to take it all the way!
{ Keep It Simple and} **Stupid**
negatoro 1 month ago
The gear looks like its going so fast its skipping teeth, wouldn't this have an effect on combustion, timing as well as efficiency? This engine while unique does look far from super efficient, but keep working on it Mabye you'll improve it.O_o
syanide801 2 months ago
PLEASE MAKE IT STOP!
Adler556 2 months ago
A piston driven pump is not the most efficient nor effective. A simple GEAR DRIVEN displacement is far better. They have been in use for 100 years, only 2 moving parts, no reciprocating assembly. This model is very similar to antique "jack pumps" used om American farms in the 1890-1920 era. Sorry -
oldboatclub 2 months ago
what the hell is this? is this for real? this has to be one of the least efficient designs i have ever seen! just listen to how loud it is, noise = lose of power
you are not a mechanical wizard
Malphazar 2 months ago
What this guy isn't taking into account, is that a crankshaft is 100% efficient. The thing that needs to be overcome is the fluid friction(oil/coolant pumping, wind resistance, bearings and seals, lubricated sliding surfaces). then we'll have a perpetual motion engine, which would be much more efficient at converting fuel into power.
meandmyevo 2 months ago
im not sure whats going on
grandexandi 2 months ago
1crazyfocker :,,,,,is tol right..! This will not work and is not efficent at the end of the stroke you lose power and moshion with the up and down of the gears, bad idea not buyable,
david1513 2 months ago
umm, this is so stupid in every way please stop, please, please stop.
Kinematographer 3 months ago
now try aplying the power to the piston and let see it skip all the time ...
GHOSTTOYS 3 months ago
To EFFICIENTLY transfer motion gears MUST not vibrate. By the way, What you have is NOT a engine. It's a crazy gear.
johnnnyreb51 3 months ago
@johnnnyreb51 is that made of metal, and ready to be put in your application? i dont think so. judging it at its point in development right now would be dumb.
ChrisreadIRL 3 months ago
just because you taped "super efficient" doen'st make what you wanted it to be...
bazengao 3 months ago
high performance vibrator :D
MrxCoockieMonster 3 months ago 31
The diameter of a piston is pi D to it's friction surface whereas the surface area of the piston increases proportionally to the diameter. pi r^2
This should tell you that as the piston increases in size the friction caused by the moving of the piston becomes relatively less as the diameter increases. Ergo one of the basic assumptions you are using is wrong. Please redo your math.
WaterFall1973 4 months ago
average engine life 25 minutes..scrap that desinge and make anuther dude this is a step down the wrong path, keep at it though
LazDevice 4 months ago
New generation dildo motor
samus989 4 months ago
what the hell did i just watch?
TomLocura 5 months ago
it is a gear nothing more, its not your idea, its over 100 years old, a crankshaft is the most efficant way to transmit power from a piston to rotation. this is 10% to 20% less efficant then a stanard crank shaft. 2nd just because you think its better does not mean it is. you cant just say its 50% more efficant on gas, its not, you are a lier a cheat and a theif. its opsolete. and if you did try to use it in an engine it would work for 30 sec b4 the force at the end stroke rips the pinion off!
1crazyfocker 10 months ago 21
@MrxCoockieMonster A crankshaft is not more the most efficient way to transmit power from a piston to rotation. The best way is no bearing at all between pistons and a rotating shaft as you may see in one of my videos at youtube. I manufacture this principle as the first clean water hydraulic motor or first total oil-free high pressure water pump at Wolfhat Industries. It may interest you.
InventorWillimczik 2 months ago
@InventorWillimczik okay, heres a little schooling for you. a piston is linear movement. a shaft/wheel is rotational movement, in order to connect the two some sort of linkage is needed. and by stating "the best way is no bearings at all" is an incomplete thought, as you leave out the most important part the linkage. this is simple physics, and first year mechanical engineering, the crank is the most efficient form for linking a piston to a shaft. give a name of a linkage thats better. you cant
1crazyfocker 2 months ago
@1crazyfocker Be careful what you are writing. You should first educate yourself by going to WolfhartIndustries…where the kinematik is explained - by a physicist!!
By the way; everybody can buy it. Pistons – disk and shaft are one part – without any bearing between them. Your “linkage” is a simple disk. It is simple physics.
InventorWillimczik 2 months ago
@InventorWillimczik and being explained by a physicist or a mechanical engineer is one thing, since they know what they are talking about. how ever you dont seem to even understand whats going on. the topic is about changing linear motion to rotary motion. this is not about spamming for an outdated over 100 yr old rotary type engine is more efficient then a 35% efficient piston engine. but what is the most efficient way to convert linear to rotational energy, which is the simple crank.
1crazyfocker 2 months ago
@InventorWillimczik
mate you're a fricken idiot! this will never work as an engine! i.e. a device that will do rotational/mechanical work/produce any power via an output shaft! it may work as a pump! but that is not an engine! get it right. also your wrong in pretty much every comment you've written on this video...stick to lego technic buddy!
macatac234 2 months ago
@macatac234 I am one of the very few inventors who manufacture his own inventions (Wolfhart Industries). I invented and developed the first clear water hydraulic motor or first oil-free high pressure pump. I never claimed it is an “engine”.
I will congratulate you as soon you invention comes to the market, but as long this is not the case you should be a little more cautious. Only idiots use foul language and diffamations.
By the way: I talked to another user
InventorWillimczik 2 months ago
@1crazyfocker well first of all your nonsense about it driving a fly wheel is crap because this would probably driving a fly wheel any way. second gears have been invented but this guy patented this intended use therefore it is still a great innovation. and i am currently designing my own engine and know for a fact that your big fat trolling as has no proof especially since the only username you could think of was 1crazyfocker! try being a bit more respectable next time idiot.
thepeoplesamaricuh 2 months ago
@thepeoplesamaricuh HA HA HA... wow why not try reading what i post. i never said anything about a "fly wheel" in any of my post, now others have tho, but not me. and as for the trolling lets see, i dont call anyone names, I dont insult anyone, I use facts that can be backed up by anyone that can use a search engine, or has completed the 5th grade. and this "innovation" was just that when it was first patentes over 100 yrs ago for this "intended use", -cont-
1crazyfocker 2 months ago
@thepeoplesamaricuh -contpart2-
so this is over 100yrs old invented by someone else, and it was proven even then how inefficient it was. and all it takes is 5 to 10 minutes to look up facts, and a want to improves ones self, which trolls just dont ever seem to want to do. and as for my user name....HA HA HA HA next time you troll try useing something of relevance instead of your jealousy of usernames and other ppls quotes. nothing is funnier then a fail troll..HA HA HA HA
1crazyfocker 2 months ago
being able to power a model and have it work is not the same as being able to have a model PRODUCE power. sure you can spin the intended output of this thing you've created but i highly doubt that it would be able to produce power.
amhedinger 11 months ago
This "rod" with 20 minutes of running a scheme of work considered "light " will burst. If not, the vibration of this engine will be immense and unbearable. Imagine you using your car with an engine of these. Can they please, invent something that does not use gasoline. Do something really innovative, let the era of "piston" in the 19th century ...
cd1306 1 year ago
what are you tryin too achieve showin a piece of rubber floatin about
crashoveride11 1 year ago
Not going to be efficient. Sorry. A conventional motor will be more efficient, reliable, and powerful. Neat design though.
buggar4466 1 year ago
Sorry, there is the conventional piston engine type,...Or the Wankel rotary engine, Both of these engines can produce massive amounts of Hp and Tq. Eg. A big block 9.0 Lt Hemi, supercharged running on 90% nitro makes 10,000 hp at 9500 RPM, A Quad rotor Wankel engine used in the 24 hr le mans is only 2600 cc but is capable of 20000 rpm and produces 700 + hp, Until a similar engine has the capabilities to come close to any of these, The world will continue to use these two combustion engines.
Mitsdat 1 year ago
Winner of the Darwin Award. Congratulations. LOL.
Dresden0010 1 year ago
One Word: Embarassing. If I were to ever design anything remotely resembling this crap, would some one please shoot me on sight? LOL.
Dresden0010 1 year ago
I'd try your system with compressed air before posting videos.I don't think it would even make a full cycle.
heliarche 1 year ago
50% my ass.
gilessmokey 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Such a horrible design, just like all Daimler ideas. I post reasons on other videos of this crap design, but cant seem to get them all.
dougeggers 1 year ago
Such a horrible design, just like all Daimler ideas. I post rreasons on other videos of this crap design, but cant seem to get them all.
dougeggers 1 year ago
What will make the ring gear go back and forth when it's the thing running the other gear?
8182junebug 1 year ago
@8182junebug Nothing in my opinion.It might make half a cycle and then stop.He seems to think that turning the crankshaft is the same as the pistons driving the mechanism.This is a good case of putting the cart before the horses.
heliarche 1 year ago
and expecially stop putting your name near something like Daimler..
PowerMirai85 1 year ago
i love for my car to sound like this
mustangrules 1 year ago
lol stop putting your name on everything... -.-
PowerMirai85 1 year ago
super efficient and super noisy
SoLSamuraibloodblade 1 year ago
umm...i wish it were slowed down so we could actually SEE the movement, because to me it just looks like it's randomley bouncing around...
SnoozersDog 1 year ago
where's the combustion ? The engine is supposed to work by the pistons driving the crank - not the othe way araound as in your model. You can already see gimbal lock starting to happen at high revs.
humanpeanys 1 year ago
i already tried this... the stop and start design of a piston engine puts too much stress on that geared ring
yoeltwix 1 year ago
The outer ring is just bouncing off of the inside gear... FAIL!!
dragonkiller63729 1 year ago
very bad, this type of engine wouldnt last in a car...the ring bounces all over the place and has no proper cycle
666TECHNO666 1 year ago
how long does this yellow ring last then? looks like something that really takes a beating
Rhandahl 1 year ago
@died4hislove
yes your right but smaller piston = smaller displacement = less power.
IsicanA7X 1 year ago
wouldn't work with a car/bus/truck the over excessive use would eat up those gears great idea though
Invisiblepanda 1 year ago
How could you possibly balance this? I see the inventor trying to hold it steady with a small model, with no piston or con-rod attached. All this vibration would put excessive wear on the gears and bearings. How long can you run this basic set up died4hislove?
locouk 1 year ago
SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE (PART 4) will soon be uploaded... Here shows the idea on how the vibration is minimum...( pls. subscribe so I can inform it to you later)
Silent gears such as spur gear will solve the problem.Also, the unique guide system that I invented and proper lubrication will cushion the mechanism to make it silent...
died4hislove 1 year ago
its defintly a very interesting machine but i would like to see how it would auchly work on lets say a moter cycle or a dyno test to see the horse power and torqe
theredneckpothead 1 year ago
What the heck makes you think this thing is efficient? It's going to beat itself to crap in no time...and be very loud doing it.
egopower 1 year ago 2
HOW LONG HAVE YOU HAD IT RUNNing for a period of time
cobraman897 1 year ago
i have a few questions like whats the total life span of the gear teeth? and also is there a certine speed where the ring becomes unstable and starts bouncing?
Bikertothemax1 2 years ago
TEABAGing engine? =P
vortex3d 2 years ago
this is a great concept for a r/c car;but in reality,there are too many wear areas that it would not last long; and the tourque produced is very minimal.you would have too build a motor twice the size of a passenger car too pull it!!!
serpentstooth1 2 years ago
We want to hope that this invention does not disappear again in a drawer.
Berolinus 2 years ago
Is the central "ring" is pushed to make a gear coupling tight? if not, any effort on the central shaft and gears will slip and the central ring will be bouncing without any work
obeybosss 2 years ago
@died4hislove
Logic of piston rods must develop.
And it has pistons but it hasn't any valve. Is this internal combustion motor ? If it is;
it must have valves for absorption and exhaust
Thanks.
F471H 2 years ago
its rotational mechanics you can learn about it in any basic phisics class
morganman102 2 years ago
ok where uis the working prototype?
jiggahippo 2 years ago
This will never work. Once fired the center gear will bounce around like a pinball since it is free floating. You would have to hold the center gear firmly against the crank gears for this to work and since it can't be held in that manner because it would bind it just won't work.
taz6122 2 years ago
as long as it doesn't shatter into fine sand the applications are numerous
JuanPapaNicolao 2 years ago
your not the brightest fish in the ocean died4hislove. again the power from an engine comes from the pistons not the crank.your crank wouldnt move once power comes from pistons
morganman102 2 years ago
lol its bouncing freely around. super efficient-super dangerous
morganman102 2 years ago
You have yet to prove it to us. Judging just by the sound it makes, I doubt it is.
Zxceelxuz 2 years ago
once again you're videos do not show how this motor can be put into a practical use. that gear is just flopping aound inside of what ever that is. seems like you have too much time with your errector set
milam661 2 years ago
I can see this used for motorcycles or scooters. Cars and trucks, maybe.
Seattlecarnut 2 years ago
what is that yellow piece of plastic flailing around doing there anyway?
FatalMusa 2 years ago
@FatalMusa
it makes a loud and clear noise, so you can recognise that the engine is running when its dark, too...
beatfinity 2 years ago
That's the super efficient bouncing around deely bob with the stripped out teeth. The only Super efficient thing here is this guys imagination and or sense of humor. This guy laughs his ass off every time somebody says they're impressed with his " idea ". ROTFL . The teeth in the yellow gear look like they're made from melting "Silly Putty". LOL again!
stoker20 2 years ago
Ok, i've seen part 3 already, and i'm very interested in it.
Motorsport1999 2 years ago
How many rpms is it running at?
Motorsport1999 2 years ago
It's a bullshit pump and this guy needs to build the biggest one ever.
stoker20 2 years ago
of coarse the sticker itself is 100% efficient..
it expends no energy what so ever but manages to convay the message or "super efficent" quite well.. X3
ZerqTM 2 years ago 2
because rigth now all i am seeing is a super efficient sticker.
ZerqTM 2 years ago
well show us the proof then i am curious to se what supposedly makes this motor so efficient.
and if it actualy is...
Youtube is full of bullshit cliams she us so dam proof or else this ammounts to little more then unserious spreading of missinformation.
and we have pleanty of that as it is
ZerqTM 2 years ago
Why have you titled it super efficient? looks more like a piece of shit. It's noisy, It creates a large amount of friction/vibration compared to a normal crankshaft. Please tell me why you call this efficient?
runescapeownsnubs 2 years ago
tell me have you ever heard a "normal motors internals exposed in a MODEL they are how did you put it "It's noisy, It creates a large amount of friction/vibration" all motors do why do you think the break the reason that you don't feel the vibrations is because they have been balanced and are bolted to a steel frame. yet again i say this is just this guys model not the finished working motor do you think any motor run smooth at concept?
Rodney348 2 years ago 2
So I am still wondering why your still pursuing this dead end design. Explain how your going to overcome the huge amount of friction this gear drive produces? let alone it almost destroys itself while in operation.
bladerunner1268 2 years ago 3
I will release on youtube my design development ( maybe next week)... please comment again later...
died4hislove 2 years ago
So what's the point? Hoping for it to go wrong or your superbackward bent fingers? Sorry, ...
Nikoslol 2 years ago
A round magnet on top of the drive shalft gear that sticks to the oval piston guide is your secret guide mechanizm?
ImplosionTechnology 2 years ago
No...
died4hislove 2 years ago
its seems like this engine would be all over the place. accelleration wouldn't be a constant.
t2klilt 2 years ago
It's an interesting design, I'd like to see one that was balanced and had a piston attached. Better yet, a working model with at least 2 pistons horizontally opposed. I want to see that it will actually work SMOOTHLY (important in today's passenger car engines).
Amras0407 2 years ago
The problem I see is, that without some sort of retaining piece in the center of the oval to keep the gear in the oval track, the 'real working version' of this concept, made obviously from steel or an alloy of some sort, would wreck itself in a very short time, stripping the teeth off of the gear or out of the track, and potentially cracking the oval shaped gear rack. The polymer versions get the general idea across, but I'd like to see what would happen even to an aluminum version.
jiro9cuts0001 2 years ago
this thing worns realy fast if jused in a real car
nvtuning 2 years ago
Recent design is VERY DURABLE...
died4hislove 2 years ago
You obviously haven't seen the project on paper, there are pistons, not just moving parts. You're right, he hasn't invented anything, he just revolutionized (hopefully in a good way) the internal combustion piston engine.
BRIDGEUSA99 2 years ago
You obviously have no brain or want to betray other people. This stuff won't work with pistons in real life, period.
MrPrivyet 2 years ago
I did not included the pistons on this video because my main purposes are to shown how the system vibrates when carrying heavy loads and to show how the system functions at higher rpm. It was not my purpose here to show to you the exact design... Since you cannot prove your point..therefore your words returns to you...
died4hislove 2 years ago
It is fake. In slow motion you would see that it is only vibrating and not circulating.
MrPrivyet 2 years ago
The system shown was not yet balanced and the internal oval gear's weight is about 3/4 kilogram... My purpose is to show it's vibration amount at approximately 3000 rpm... If the weight of the oval gear is reduced and proper balance is applied , minimal vibration can be seen...
died4hislove 2 years ago
I have to agree with jiro9cuts0001, you need some sort of retaining piece to hold it in place, but that's next to impossible as the piece would have to locate itself in the opposite side of the track to stop vibration. Perhaps, if the gear in the center was an oval shape and not a circle, it might work a little better. Food for thought.
Magnuspire 2 years ago
I think its advantages will be more than outweighed by its disadvantages, vibration etc. Thanks for showing. :)
barumman 2 years ago
There is just one word to say: BULLSHIT.
MrPrivyet 2 years ago
Your word returns to you if you can't prove that this invention is not true...
died4hislove 2 years ago
I fail to see how this is going to make it more efficient. If there is so much side load on the pistons eating power why not make the connecting rod longer? now you just have an extra piece reciprocating back and forth and more rotating mass.
MoPar7055 2 years ago
go to the link that says 50% less fuel consumption and you'll see that i was saying EXACTLY what you are saying dude. nice to see somebody agree with me for a change
corotor12345 2 years ago
What can I say, great minds think alike
MoPar7055 2 years ago
lol, how're you so sure that we're both great minds? xD nmd lets just stick to it
corotor12345 2 years ago
Well I am a great mind, thats a given, therefore you must be to if you think alike. hahaha
MoPar7055 2 years ago
lol, I see modesty isn't your most obvious virtue now is it? but wait, if you speak about IQ, I must tell you, it isn't as reliable and has long been thought of as mearly an aproximation. now, if you've achieved anything on your own, then that's another story. anyways, I PM'd you the link, just so we can agree on the same subject as we currently are, but have more people read it. cuz please, the YouTube community is in desperate need of some enlightment (says the stubborn atheist)
corotor12345 2 years ago
By just saying something saves 50% of anything, doesn't actually make it so.
joescion 2 years ago
Thats going to be a loud engine when the oval piece gos up and down and slaps the crankshaft constantly.
MoPar7055 2 years ago
You don't know yet the design to make it silent and smooth...
died4hislove 2 years ago
is a cagata.
canajaaf 2 years ago
As you know efficiency can be quantified as the work out, over work in.
So do you have a percentage? or at least an estimation... other than just stating that it is "SUPER EFFICIENT"
You might receive more (positive) interest, if you could give some figures and not just ambiguous terms meant to wow the layman.
Co7in 2 years ago
i can't belive you got a thumbs down! it's so irritating to see how all these 40 year old mothers end up looking at this and just thumbing down every smart comment they see cuz they just buy into everything the video tells them, how ridiculous!... im with you all the way, this looks too positive to be true, this is NOT what it claims to be. fucking jerks arrghh
corotor12345 2 years ago
Comment removed
Co7in 2 years ago
super efficient
at vibrating things to death yher
njipods 2 years ago
VERY MINIMAL VIBRATION can be seen on my recent design development...
died4hislove 2 years ago
minimal vibration can be seen because it is held on a support
ZenonDorinPower 2 years ago
The video shown above is not my recent design development...
died4hislove 2 years ago
that thinkk looks like it is bouncing around lol
bigdog813 2 years ago
That looks like some pretty destructive vibration. How is this an improvement on the traditional connecting rod/crankshaft combination if it's got all that unbalanced weight slamming back and forth?
Theriomalstrom 2 years ago
this is interesting it will be smoother running when it comes ti the crank but you will need to get a speed reducer and all the parts will have to be balanced.a reducer cuz you will have high rpms but no torque or power. and balanced cuz it will be bouncing a lot . have ing a balanced motor will give you more rpms and less fuel consumption. good idea becuz it is just like a rotary motor but adapted for the piston engine
phillipprc 2 years ago
But thanks for the laughs, sorry it took you 11 years just to amuse us on here.
TheRealCatnut 2 years ago
I think you don't understand ...
died4hislove 2 years ago
this guy is a few pistons short of a V8
TheRealCatnut 2 years ago 4
Is that a new kind of sybian?
(sorry, couldn't resist)
ramzahnY 2 years ago 4
Ok look first off to put that in a car you would need some serious motor mounts plus something to deaden the vibration and another thing to make a motor big enough to power a car that would throw the front end all over the place so back to the drawing board
IspooledurMom 2 years ago 2
Seems more usefull as a personal vibrator.
EdwardPack1988 3 years ago
maby he will be able to put the last 11 years of his life to good use after all..
maxhall69 3 years ago
the francis daimler tabag personal vibrator, buy one get one free. until it strips it gears into your skin.
EdwardPack1988 3 years ago
I just LoL'd
sweffe96 2 years ago
demo is useless and uninformative: there are no loads being applied as they would be in the real world which would snap teeth off the gears: do the math! it is also insipid to claim that this complex motion is easier to balance than a conventional piston engine, and negating the complete redesign of the supporting engine block.
jacquemeihoffe 3 years ago
hey get it in your head no good move on
volks1234 3 years ago
Please watch the very simple use of this idea and think again if this is no good. See , UNIQUE ROBOT LEGS : STEPS LONGER, FASTER AND BETTER.
died4hislove 3 years ago
OK your idea is good because there is less friction going on in that system.... but your engine wont work the way you think it will...your engine will be weak were the piston rod would connect to your gear...not only that it will be harder to balance your engine and it would be hard to time your engine when each piston will fire at top dead center....also all that gearing will wear out from grinding and eventually the engine would be no good...sorry dude your idea sucks...
jonaman1980 3 years ago
The unique GUIDE SYSTEM that I invented is the key to the durability,timing,etc... of this new system. Balancing this system is easier compare to a rotary engine.
died4hislove 3 years ago
I must disagree with you on that. the rectangular gear creates a tun of vibration and will strip itself much faster than round gears.
DonHoraldo 3 years ago
i agree, if that weird gear had some weight to it, at 3000 rpm it would shake that little contraption to death.
KingRichard572 3 years ago
The unique gear shown weights 3/4 kg and moving at approximately 3000 rpm small gear's speed. No problem was encountered.
died4hislove 3 years ago
do you know what it weighs while its moving? what about when the gear is cast iron? also your test setup backwards, u need to apply force to the piston not the crankshaft to spin the gear, when force is applied that "unique" gear will jump right off the crankshaft. hold the crankshaft tight and push down on the piston and watch what happens
KingRichard572 3 years ago
Please don't ask me such simple questions. You are saying this things because you don't see yet the UNIQUE GUIDE SYSTEM that i invented (confidential).
died4hislove 3 years ago
unique guide system? i smell burning... you'll reduce your "efficiency"
KingRichard572 3 years ago
i highly doubt that
maxhall69 3 years ago
i think i might work better if you put two of them crossed over ,one horzotaly, and the other vertical and just keep crossing them when more pistons are placed
nationsmotive 3 years ago
Thanks a lot for your good suggestion.
died4hislove 3 years ago
ummmm, that is not going to work, sure it might work when the force to spin the ring comes from the gear, but not the other way around.
summit8000x 3 years ago
The inventors of the airplane were also criticized and being ridiculed then(people says that their idea will not work ,but look now, we are benefiting a lot their invention).
died4hislove 3 years ago
that is both unrelated and simply not a good enough reason for why this idea will work. from wheat i (and a few others) have seen the crank is always driven by a motor whats going to keep the ring gear seated and spinning the right direction on the crank gear?
thelegendarycd 3 years ago 3
And how is combustion involved? You're only spinning it with a motorized crankshaft. I'd love to see this in action but it's just not going to work.
QNEV 3 years ago
Just imagine the huge train of vibration it produces...
samoht1977 3 years ago
Vibration can be solved by employing opposite movements (example:two oval gears moving opposite directions). We can also solve vibration using balancers/bobweights,etc... Since this is very efficient, we can lessen it's piston stroke to minimize vibration.
died4hislove 3 years ago
Just saw a clip illustrating "spherical valves". Well, it might be just an idea putting those two technologies together...
samoht1977 3 years ago
i dont know all information about this engin so i cant says if it were efficient or not but maybe be a probleme hum ... it really chake hard so how long it can run without any mechanical failure ???
raynor1212 3 years ago
I believe that this engine is more durable than a rotary engine. Its durability can also be equal to a conventional piston-reciprocating engine.
died4hislove 3 years ago
studying this system for eleven years proves only one thing. you are a slow learner.
flyinflip 3 years ago
So you have rewritten the Newtonian laws of physics and solved the effects of inertia, friction, impact loads, gear design, assembly design, material selection,etc.. You will go down in history as the greatest physicist that ever lived. Why stop with just this engine? The truth is I think you should have spent that time in school.
UTUBPLEASE 3 years ago
I did not stop with just this engine. In fact this mechanism is the basic of my many inventions. I invented a unique robot legs(you may view it soon through the youtube), most efficient bicycle crank arm system, a gas compressor that can save 30 percent electricity,
died4hislove 3 years ago
I have Maleve "Internal Combustion Engines" published 1945. I know exactly what you mean. You want to convert the sinusoidal motion of the piston into a square wave to increase the area in the indicator diagram page 5. That is a worthwhile thing to do but you will have to come up with another mechanism to do it. You are ignoring the high piston acceleration at top and bottom of the stroke. Piston acceleration is a fundamental problem with crankshafts. Rotary engines do not have that problem.
UTUBPLEASE 3 years ago
Ive'd studied this mechanism for almost 12 years and you are saying to me that I am ignoring the high piston acceleration at Top to Bottom of the stroke ... I think you should understand that I already tackled and solved the effects of inertia,friction, impact loads, gear design,assembly design, material selection,etc...The unique GUIDE SYSTEM of this mechanism is the key to solve all these problems. Sorry but i cannot disclose to you the information regarding this guide system.
died4hislove 3 years ago
because you dont have the information......
maxhall69 3 years ago
Exactly!
I love how he capitalizes things like "GUIDE SYSTEM" and "SUPER EFFICIENT". XD
I always imagine someone yelling when I see caps. Damnedable internets!
QuantumCarl 3 years ago
I think what you are trying to say is the piston motion in your engine effectively stops at top dead center for a short period of time, accelerates rapidly down the bore and slams to a stop at the bottom of the bore for another short period of time. Therefore it spends relatively less time going down the bore. This, in theory, is the same as a cam engine. Good luck getting that to work.
UTUBPLEASE 3 years ago
I can prove to you by models, examples or principles that the piston will not slam but i think you will not still be convinced. I think the best thing to do now is to have a running engine.And that's my objective. Thank you for your constructive criticism anyway.
died4hislove 3 years ago
Delayed travel?? What ever are you talking about? You are making up terms as you go along. There is no stinking "delayed travel". Baloney. The piston starts going down immediately after ignition results in max BMEP. Expansion is over in 90 CS degrees. Get Fayette's Taylor's book "The Internal-Combustion Engine. The heat going into the cooling system has nothing to do with the heat going out of the exhaust.
UTUBPLEASE 3 years ago
Study the piston's percentage of stroke for every 10 degrees crank turn from TDC to BDC( Internal Combustion Engine by V.L. Maleev 2nd edition), or try to compute the circular distance of say 1.5 inch radius crank arm (circular distance from TDC to BDC ) and analyze it's circular distance compare to it's 3 inches piston stroke(notice that they have different distance travel ) .Then you will know what I mean.
died4hislove 3 years ago
Engine friction consumes only a small portion of the energy in a gallon of gas. 50% goes out the tailpipe in the form of waste heat. Another 20% is dissipated by the cooling system. Mechanical efficiency including all forms of friction is less than 5%. What should be focused on is the 50% waste energy in the exhaust. Search youtube and the the world wide web for turbo compound.
UTUBPLEASE 3 years ago
One main reason why more heat energy goes out the tailpipe is the 36 percent delayed travel of piston. In a normal engine the piston's travel is delayed by 36 percent(from TDC to BDC).By this, the gases remain in contact with the cooling walls for a relatively long time & more of the heat energy will be lost to the engine frame,jacket, and tailpipe. This new mechanism can greatly reduce piston's delayed travel(I can prove it). This advantage alone will result to a super-efficient engine.
died4hislove 3 years ago
how will this affect the time it takes for trhe air/fuel mixture to combust? will combustion start while the piston in your system is slightly before TDC, possibly causing the engine to run backwards?( or not at all) Ignition timing will have to be set very to close to TDC in order to minimize this situation but won't that in effect shorten the time the mixture has to burn before the piston begins to fall? Won't that decrease power?
ProfessorK100 2 years ago
Engines with crank shafts have weights on them that provide centrifugal force that keeps the engine spinning in a continuous direction. Ignition to the fuel/air mixture is introduced 20-35 degrees before TDC. In your design if the engine has no crank shaft how will you provide the momentum the engine needs to operate? Also if the piston does not hesitate at TDC the mixture will not provide trhe same amount of force to your piston as is provided in a conventional recip engine.
ProfessorK100 2 years ago
Flywheel solves this problem...
died4hislove 2 years ago
All you have shown is a mechanism. No pistons, no connecting rods, no valves, no nothing. All of these parts enter into the balance of an internal combustion engine. Until you build a complete engine and run it you can not say it is super efficient or can you say "vibration is minimal". The clattering sound of the mechanism is a clue.
UTUBPLEASE 3 years ago
If an engine design can meet the accepted principles/requirements to be a very efficient engine,the result of that design on actual will be very efficient.This new design meets the requirements needed such as:
1. Proper position of input forces to the crankshaft. 2. Elimination of large amount of friction (side thrust) between the cylinder wall and piston. 3.reduced delayed travel of piston by more than 20 percent.
The clattering sound can be solved by using spur gear & a unique guide system.
died4hislove 3 years ago
There is nothing about this engine that is "super efficient". High efficiency comes from the combustion chamber and not the mechanism that converts linear motion to rotary motion. The only thing super about this engine is the vibration.
UTUBPLEASE 3 years ago
Regarding vibration,I think your wrong because based from the actual model shown with the small gear having approximate speed of 3000 RPM and the oval gear's weight about 3/4 kilogram (heavy weight of the oval gear was intentional so we can observe how this