@littlefrank90 lol in every single fps video there's dozens of noobs saying shit like this, or that the eye cant see more than 120, or that the monitor refresh rate limits it...
You're all bullshit. Why? Type "cod fps difference" in google, hit the first one. No more arguments needed.
@ROFLOLMAOMG82 yes, i understand what you say, i can see the difference between 60 and 120fps. i just said that animations were recorded at 125 fps. just like face animation are recorded at 30fps in l.a. noire and that's why that game is capped at 30fps. i'm just saying that it's pointless to slow it down because you will only see 125 frames in one second of video, even if your game runs at 1000 :)
@littlefrank90 my point was that having higher fps is not pointless ;p you can't as much see the difference between 120 or 250 fps or even 500 fps as much as you can feel it. 80 fps is bad, 125 is good, 250 is perfect. There's also a 333 sweetspot. Thanks to promod and pam you usually need to have it limited to 250 or you won't play. Having high fps in cod on a high end machine is like... meh. Squeezing out a stable 250 from a cheap machine is really something.
@ROFLOLMAOMG82 and you are perfectly right, totally agree with you, i really feel the difference and feel the need to play at higher framerate than 90
@yeehaw789 60 is perfectly smooth, but the human eye can notice framerate changes far higher than 60 fps. Most monitors can only display 60 FPS, I have a 120 FPS monitor and I can easily tell the difference between 60 and 120 FPS.
My name is jenny. I am 16 years old and have dark blonde hair. NOW THAT YOU HAVE STARTED READING YOU MAY NOT STOP! I wasmurdered july 14th with my fathers shotgun........ And butcher knife. If You don't post this on 20 other pages I will come to Your house in the middle of the night and kill You with my fathers shotgun and butcher k..........................................nife.
either he slowed it down on purpose or he mamanged to change the game and force it to try to render a thousand frames per second(resulting in a smooth look but very very slow video.
Not really, a higher FPS count will give you a smoother picture. He probably took the 1000 fps footage and slowed it down to around 30 frames for the video so it would be easier to see.
@MidGroundInertia Makes sense now, that's why it looks pretty high quality. I was just wondering because I was reading on Doom 4 and they said consoles will have 30 fps and PC will have 60 fps, and I'm a console player.
lol 90 fps aint limited. com_maxfps and whatever, im playing promod and got 333 fps (on promod 250 is the limit) but u can hack ur iw3mp and get 1000 fps too if u have monster computer ofc.
@cxlcitymaster Your thinking of HZ. And it's 120 actually, not 80.
Think of it like this... If there is 1 frame to show per second... Then you see 1 picture (frame) a second. If it's set to 10 then you see ten FPS, thus the game will apear all jagged and crappy. IE: The more frames the slower and smoother the graphics are. Like a high speed camera. If you had a 1 FPS camera an you slowed it down nothing would happen. If you had a 1000 FPS C and slowd it down you would have enough data for slo mo
@MoIestiaPrincess "32 Frames per second" Got any link that you can point me towards that your comment is fact? Or else it is more made up copy pasta bullshit.
@VaGuS87GaMeR Its better to just record at 30 and render em in 30. The quality WILL get better. Also i toke a look at one of your videos and it has a little screen tearing in it, You dont use vs?
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx Then surely you know you can set the frame rate on twixtor, instead of just percentage proving that you can blend in more frames. If the frame rate is high enough, you can make some smooth slow motion.
1) There is no reliable fps indicator, 200fps and 1000fps look very similar to the human eye since our eyes frame blend anyway
2) I see some slight warping on the bullets, wether that is motion blur, or twixtor, I'm unsure
3) Even if he could get 1000fps, recording it would drag the fps down. Most capture programs have a default of 30fps so it doesn't drain resources, 1000fps would drain resources like crazy. (capture programs such as fraps lock the fps)
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx Not entirely true, an add-on for adobe after effects (sony vegas, final cut pro, etc...) called twixtor can do some amazing frame blending. Even the fastest of gaming rigs couldn't get up to 1000fps, it's very hard to find computers that can do that. If his computer was capturing at about 800fps, twixtor could slow it down to 1000fps without any loss of quality and absolutely no visible warping.
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx I was talking about the frame blending process, when 500fps can be made 50% slower by blending in 500 more frames per second giving a total of 1000fps in slow motion.
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx Calm down, read my comment again very carefully. I say "if I am not mistaken". If I am, all I need is someone to prove me wrong and I'll back down. I believe calling people retards without any information to back it up is known as trolling...
@klapskates I can process more then 24 frames. I can see the difference between 24 and 60. But you might not need more then 60 since your monitor prolly only refreshes at 60Hz
@lolwut1337n355 FPS ? The Human EYE perception can see 24 pictures per secound.
The Coca-Cola Adv in the cinema did 25 pics per secound and the visitors were creepy thirsty for Coca Cola. After that it was prohibited. The Michael Jackson video has 1200 pics per secound and its feels very long. For 24 Pics per secound its feels very fast. Watch this video again and you see what i mean. -google-
@slamkam07 Go in flash, draw a square and create a motion tween 10 frames. Move the last frame 1/4 across the screen at 10 fps
Play it... Smooth yeh?
Now do the same but move the square last frame all the way to the right.
Play it... Laggy right?
Thats what happens in games. So unless you move the mouse as fast a sloth taking a shit, you should be able to notice the difference between 30 - 200fps.
Movies get away with 24fps because of motion blur.
@lolwut1337n355 lol....dude. the human eye can't percieve over 100-150 fps, and it is very easy to tell the difference between fuckin 30 fps and 60. I have a GeForce 550 TI and Crysis can run at almost max settings at 80 fps, and when i put it up to max settings my fps goes down to 45 and it's very noticeable.
@lolwut1337n355 motion blur? ur talking complete bullshit, i am EDUCATED PROGRAMER, i know, human eye CAN NOT see above 24 fps(24 pictures per second if u dont know whats that), that is caused by inertia of the eye, when light reaches inner part of your eye there is a delay in which it stays in without going away, that delay is 1/24 second long, thats why u cant tell difference betwen 24 fps and anything above, because at bigger fps your eye will still only catch 24 frames of it in second.
@TheParaxore The human eye does not see in frames. Also, difference between 120Hz and 60Hz monitors is huge (not "120Hz" TVs which are not actually 120Hz). There was even a test where Air Force pilots could identify a plane on a flashed picture that lasted for 1/220th of a second.
The whole "you can't see over 60 FPS" (wasn't it 30 FPS before?) is BS.
@jamariooo It has nothing to do with SEEING, it's about how the game feels at higher fps. Higher frames per second means better hitreg due to the hit boxes being updated every frame. 60 fps = 60 Hit box updates every second. 250 - 250 Hit box updates.
Also the higher the fps the better the game feels, you can jump higher, run faster without making any sound. And strafe :)
@sincity4012 because the computer detects the fps. A high fps makes the game feel more responsive and ensures that no fps drop will affect the smoothness ^^
its so fast .. it slow down time
bc71766 6 days ago
Animation still have about 125 fps so it's pointless
littlefrank90 2 weeks ago
@littlefrank90 lol in every single fps video there's dozens of noobs saying shit like this, or that the eye cant see more than 120, or that the monitor refresh rate limits it...
You're all bullshit. Why? Type "cod fps difference" in google, hit the first one. No more arguments needed.
ROFLOLMAOMG82 1 week ago
@ROFLOLMAOMG82 yes, i understand what you say, i can see the difference between 60 and 120fps. i just said that animations were recorded at 125 fps. just like face animation are recorded at 30fps in l.a. noire and that's why that game is capped at 30fps. i'm just saying that it's pointless to slow it down because you will only see 125 frames in one second of video, even if your game runs at 1000 :)
littlefrank90 1 week ago
@littlefrank90 my point was that having higher fps is not pointless ;p you can't as much see the difference between 120 or 250 fps or even 500 fps as much as you can feel it. 80 fps is bad, 125 is good, 250 is perfect. There's also a 333 sweetspot. Thanks to promod and pam you usually need to have it limited to 250 or you won't play. Having high fps in cod on a high end machine is like... meh. Squeezing out a stable 250 from a cheap machine is really something.
ROFLOLMAOMG82 1 week ago
@ROFLOLMAOMG82 and you are perfectly right, totally agree with you, i really feel the difference and feel the need to play at higher framerate than 90
littlefrank90 1 week ago
yeah try that in crysis bf3 mw3 it wont happen unless u have like three 4gb nvidia graphics card that will cost u about 5000$.
milkweed728 2 weeks ago
@MrESPRIMOMobile not at all really. 30 frames a second is pretty standard. i cant tell the difference between 60 and 30 so it doesnt really matter.
kize127 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch!!!!! /watch?v=QLxjpDODrQA
snarZHD 3 weeks ago
my fps?1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
MLGxThexGriz 3 weeks ago
Human eye is capable of seeing no more than 60FPS, thats why everything above 60 looks exactly the same.
yeehaw789 3 weeks ago
@yeehaw789 60 is perfectly smooth, but the human eye can notice framerate changes far higher than 60 fps. Most monitors can only display 60 FPS, I have a 120 FPS monitor and I can easily tell the difference between 60 and 120 FPS.
MrRiadon 3 weeks ago
@MrRiadon I will have to see that, didnt know one existed.
yeehaw789 3 weeks ago
@yeehaw789
1000fps in editing is different than fps in video. Dumbass. People that come on and make this comment need to learn facts before they post.
zziREAPER 2 weeks ago
@zziREAPER Thats not even related to my comment, I was just stating something I heard before but someone kindly corrected me, asshole.
yeehaw789 2 weeks ago
1000fps = Human eye/brain can't process more than ~100 unless you go slow mo = irrelevant
HumaneAnon 4 weeks ago
100 fps or 1000 fps - You don't feel a different !
MatschesLP 1 month ago
@MatschesLP in slow mo you SEE a difference ... not feel
dragonxanimation 1 month ago
i want to play only 125/333 fps ;]
SuperDnbWarrior 1 month ago
Mine is 4000
CALLOFDUTYMAN32 1 month ago
My GTX 590 is crazy!
jk i have 550 TI
DanPKCPark 1 month ago
yeah but the animations where only animated at 60fps
feliS2012 1 month ago
My GTS 450 Has 10000+ Fps :O
Battleoff1 1 month ago
Oh.... Now i know how to be a pro in games. Just buy a computer that run's games at 1000fps so every thing is slow mo, and u can aim like a boss. :D
WhiteAlcatraz 1 month ago
do people still play this? if so which patch has highest population? i cant play mw3 cuz i cant ever connect but i can dl shit at 2mb/sec
reactcirca 1 month ago
about 30-40 on celeron d 3.06ghz
ram:512mb
gpu:radeon hd 4350 1gb
lazar96a 1 month ago
324, not too bad, i can't complain :)
TheCombatStory 1 month ago
2k in minecraft title screen -___-
MrThatguyq 1 month ago
That's not slow fps its just he slowmoed it so u can see the fps, like the bullet ejecting
Butterbumkins 1 month ago
too bad youtube fps is 30
IR806 1 month ago
Frames per seconds trololo
Daiikunz 1 month ago
this is like 4-5 fps lol
egwofcourse2 1 month ago
You guys really don't know what FPS is, right?
Before you comment, do a little research.
eminemcod2 1 month ago
47 fps
lalacomun88 1 month ago
Lol its not 1000 FPS its 5 FPS.
Luis112ish 1 month ago
@Luis112ish fucking retard
tehMARZEH 1 month ago
@Luis112ish you have no idea what they're talking about.
JoJoRockets52 1 month ago
@Luis112ish im no 5 fps frams per soceond not lag u try running 1000 fps
raywilleim0 1 month ago
lagg xD
aaronx021 1 month ago
that would only matter if your monitor's refresh rate was 1000 and since its not possible so it doesn't matter
if you have monitor that has a 60 refresh rate having anymore then 60fps wouldn't matter at all.
Same with a monitor with 120mhz if the game is over 120 fps it doesn't really matter.
Inthepastxx 1 month ago
@Inthepastxx 1000 fps / 33.3 = 30 fps.
The video shows smooth slowmotion that is 33 times slower than normal.
BadeAndenB 1 month ago
@BadeAndenB I love how you just completely pulled that one out of your ass,
Inthepastxx 1 month ago
@Inthepastxx I'm sorry? You can clearly see the video is slowed down, right?
BadeAndenB 1 month ago 5
12
XcelGaMeZ 1 month ago
Cod4 is the only first person shooter (fps) I like.
dRNPS3 1 month ago
@dRNPS3
I'm sorry to hear that
rickyriddysguardian 1 month ago
100 and dot xD
mutant394 1 month ago
dang dude nice fps ;)
themkidswhopwn 1 month ago
180 fps with ultra low and i have modified my config file to all 0
qepaxhiu 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My name is jenny. I am 16 years old and have dark blonde hair. NOW THAT YOU HAVE STARTED READING YOU MAY NOT STOP! I wasmurdered july 14th with my fathers shotgun........ And butcher knife. If You don't post this on 20 other pages I will come to Your house in the middle of the night and kill You with my fathers shotgun and butcher k..........................................nife.
GN6zCOD 2 months ago
@GN6zCOD Come at me bro.
DoomDood3451 1 month ago
over 9000
rteubgnvce 2 months ago
91...
TheCertifiedHeadshot 2 months ago
maximum 500 :)
ffspkzorz 2 months ago
i play only promod and then your not allowed to get more than 250 fps so why should need 1000 ? lol
and try crysis ;)
lumpylup20 2 months ago
my fps is 6 :(
TryHardMule 2 months ago
my fps is 333
njonjonjuso 2 months ago
cod games i can also get over 1000fps easily cos the graphics suck
gdialpha 2 months ago
minecraft 70
MrSatternJr 2 months ago
Try that in battlefield 3 ;)
jergen07 2 months ago 37
@jergen07 we dont needa try it in battlefield 3...we got tanks
Bangeo69 1 week ago
440 :D no lies :D
MrTubbytubs 2 months ago
2 1/2
SyKozWest 2 months ago
my is 2935
MrSumdude777 2 months ago
mine is 6........... no lies.
Trick2Tricky 2 months ago
It's obviously 999 fps not 1000.
CoreyOnPS3 2 months ago
jk i usualy play at 60 fps
1999beachboy 2 months ago
but that was a main menu otherwise 2 fps
1999beachboy 2 months ago
239 fps
1999beachboy 2 months ago
either he slowed it down on purpose or he mamanged to change the game and force it to try to render a thousand frames per second(resulting in a smooth look but very very slow video.
jabadahut50 2 months ago
750 fps
masterluc100 2 months ago
Excuse my unintelligence on this subject, but I thought the higher the fps the faster it is.
drvader5000 2 months ago
@drvader5000
Not really, a higher FPS count will give you a smoother picture. He probably took the 1000 fps footage and slowed it down to around 30 frames for the video so it would be easier to see.
MidGroundInertia 2 months ago
@MidGroundInertia Makes sense now, that's why it looks pretty high quality. I was just wondering because I was reading on Doom 4 and they said consoles will have 30 fps and PC will have 60 fps, and I'm a console player.
drvader5000 2 months ago
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx He's actually been pretty god damn accurate throughout the entire arguement, sorry dude, he's right.
slamkam07 2 months ago
CSS 230FPS MW" 60 - 130 fps
xDreamToast 2 months ago
my fps is 125 maxxxxxxxxx
MsTtttoooonnnniiii 2 months ago
my fps is over 9000!!
raywilleim0 2 months ago 55
@raywilleim0 MINE IS OVER 100000000 BILLON!
Barney5100 2 months ago
@Barney5100 you obviously haven't seen that episode of dragonball-z
BENDOVER9810 1 month ago
@raywilleim0 with what do u record?
marcusRBR 1 month ago
@raywilleim0
Dragon Ball Vegeta ?:D
Jebaakaa 1 month ago
i have maximal 400fps in MW2
TheMrKIProduction 2 months ago
13fps
TehFragh 2 months ago 75
@TehFragh areyou crazy or whatt
high0stream 1 month ago
it helps only with jumping nothing more
cryzje 2 months ago
lol 90 fps aint limited. com_maxfps and whatever, im playing promod and got 333 fps (on promod 250 is the limit) but u can hack ur iw3mp and get 1000 fps too if u have monster computer ofc.
cryzje 2 months ago
90 Fps limited so i get 90 fps.
CobraProductionsTV 2 months ago
Comment removed
CobraProductionsTV 2 months ago
0.5 fps
linkinpark90911 2 months ago
50 to 70 on all lowest setting lol. It's a laptop
MRX123MRX 2 months ago
HAHA I liked this bitch
BuLLDOG771100 2 months ago
my max fps is 2 fps :D
LittleRockerDude96 2 months ago
what kind of computer?
colin64441 2 months ago
over 9000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logan7423 2 months ago
I see in 50,000 FPS, whats this laggy shit?
rustey222 2 months ago
@rustey222 actually, the human eye only sees 60 - 70 FPS, but the rate of interpretation is less
knightrider315 2 months ago
@knightrider315 it sees 24 -.-
jamariooo 2 months ago
@jamariooo depends on the eye. im tested with 63
knightrider315 2 months ago
@jamariooo Prove it.
lolwut1337n355 2 months ago
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!
SadWieOski 2 months ago
hm probably 75 fps on blackops on lowest res and settings lol
DutchDukeMan 2 months ago
The human eye can perceive 80fps at a maximum.
cxlcitymaster 2 months ago
@cxlcitymaster Your thinking of HZ. And it's 120 actually, not 80.
Think of it like this... If there is 1 frame to show per second... Then you see 1 picture (frame) a second. If it's set to 10 then you see ten FPS, thus the game will apear all jagged and crappy. IE: The more frames the slower and smoother the graphics are. Like a high speed camera. If you had a 1 FPS camera an you slowed it down nothing would happen. If you had a 1000 FPS C and slowd it down you would have enough data for slo mo
theunifyer 2 months ago
@theunifyer oh
cxlcitymaster 2 months ago
i have over 9000 fps
giopizz 2 months ago
My fps a 1 - 12 fps
agkh123 2 months ago
The human eye catches "32 Frames per second" Meaning that it can intake 32 different visuals in any given second. Which also means "normal speed"
Anything above that would be considered slow motion, anything below would be "sped up"
MoIestiaPrincess 2 months ago
@MoIestiaPrincess "32 Frames per second" Got any link that you can point me towards that your comment is fact? Or else it is more made up copy pasta bullshit.
Eyes can perceive well over 200fps.
Google is your friend. Good day.
lolwut1337n355 2 months ago
@lolwut1337n355 75% of information on internet is partialy or completly wrong, making google your worst enemy when it comes to knowladge.
jamariooo 2 months ago
this is not 1000fps its maybe 200 this guy makes skate vids in 1000 fps his is way slower ur a fake
MrPopskickflips 2 months ago
1000fps isnt going to make this game any better :O
Spudling666 2 months ago
in minecraft i have 600fps and record with fraps at 120fps, in other games (cod, cs, battlefield) i´ve 15-250fps and record at 90 fps
VaGuS87GaMeR 2 months ago
@VaGuS87GaMeR Man you must have felt stupid when u realized youtube only display in 30 fps....
UzumakiNarutoKun96 2 months ago
@UzumakiNarutoKun96 i know, i record the games at these fps but i render at 29.97
VaGuS87GaMeR 2 months ago
@VaGuS87GaMeR Its better to just record at 30 and render em in 30. The quality WILL get better. Also i toke a look at one of your videos and it has a little screen tearing in it, You dont use vs?
UzumakiNarutoKun96 2 months ago
OVER 9000!
RoShAnOWNEDyou 2 months ago
250
GermanLetsCommentary 2 months ago
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx Then surely you know you can set the frame rate on twixtor, instead of just percentage proving that you can blend in more frames. If the frame rate is high enough, you can make some smooth slow motion.
NATB100 2 months ago
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx to add to it:
1) There is no reliable fps indicator, 200fps and 1000fps look very similar to the human eye since our eyes frame blend anyway
2) I see some slight warping on the bullets, wether that is motion blur, or twixtor, I'm unsure
3) Even if he could get 1000fps, recording it would drag the fps down. Most capture programs have a default of 30fps so it doesn't drain resources, 1000fps would drain resources like crazy. (capture programs such as fraps lock the fps)
NATB100 2 months ago
@NATB100 It's recorded with Avidemo.
v12mini 2 months ago
@v12mini I give up, the uploader is the only person with the full real information.
NATB100 2 months ago
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx Not entirely true, an add-on for adobe after effects (sony vegas, final cut pro, etc...) called twixtor can do some amazing frame blending. Even the fastest of gaming rigs couldn't get up to 1000fps, it's very hard to find computers that can do that. If his computer was capturing at about 800fps, twixtor could slow it down to 1000fps without any loss of quality and absolutely no visible warping.
NATB100 2 months ago
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx I was talking about the frame blending process, when 500fps can be made 50% slower by blending in 500 more frames per second giving a total of 1000fps in slow motion.
NATB100 2 months ago
Comment removed
EnergyGamerStudio 2 months ago
Comment removed
EnergyGamerStudio 2 months ago
@xxxxxxlarenzoxxxxxx Calm down, read my comment again very carefully. I say "if I am not mistaken". If I am, all I need is someone to prove me wrong and I'll back down. I believe calling people retards without any information to back it up is known as trolling...
NATB100 2 months ago
400 fps
chubydodawithachuro 2 months ago
GOOD THING OUR EYES CAN ONLY SEE 32 FRAMES PER SECOND WITHOUT BLUR
darkevilcreature 2 months ago
@darkevilcreature unless you turn the camera
Brewskies4u 2 months ago
That's 1000 fps when slowed down right? The original fps would be lower if i'm not mistaken.
NATB100 2 months ago
I like the Music
xxxxJarJarxxx 2 months ago
minecraft- 150
avg- 25
lowest- 0.01 then crash
commanderbly009 2 months ago
60
ProGeneral99 2 months ago
105
cerealsgood 2 months ago
i have 0 FPS why i don't have the game
Gametown100 2 months ago
mine is 100,000,000,000 max fps
DJKENmusicremix 2 months ago
i have 1000 fix
xolex100 2 months ago
OVER 9000!
PikachuOG 2 months ago
my life's lag.... im running on 15fps....
MrJohnMark21 2 months ago
i have 80 fps :D
asalop1 2 months ago
i can get 980fps lookin' air. in combat, 250.
sbk180tr 2 months ago
i can get 300 FPS
HooverTV 2 months ago
my highest would be 500 on cod4, and lol that isnt 1000 that is maybe 80-100 fps your showing.
and why higher? no difference
RaGesClan 2 months ago
How to?
roberttoot123 2 months ago
ITS OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!
MrNightshell 2 months ago
my biggest was 35:(
Reudder 2 months ago
We all need only 50 fps. Cuz the human eye can only process 45-50 pictures per secound -.-
AbleFoxCompany 2 months ago
@AbleFoxCompany the human eye can process only 24 frames per second.
klapskates 2 months ago
@klapskates thats right
AbleFoxCompany 2 months ago
@klapskates I can process more then 24 frames. I can see the difference between 24 and 60. But you might not need more then 60 since your monitor prolly only refreshes at 60Hz
TheHaCkEr1234321 2 months ago
@klapskates wrong. 60 fps moron
MrNightshell 2 months ago
@AbleFoxCompany Really? Others say it is 30, 60, 100, 200. Why? because everyone makes their own figures up just like you.
Eyes perceive well over 200fps. Google is your friend.
lolwut1337n355 2 months ago
@lolwut1337n355 FPS ? The Human EYE perception can see 24 pictures per secound.
The Coca-Cola Adv in the cinema did 25 pics per secound and the visitors were creepy thirsty for Coca Cola. After that it was prohibited. The Michael Jackson video has 1200 pics per secound and its feels very long. For 24 Pics per secound its feels very fast. Watch this video again and you see what i mean. -google-
AbleFoxCompany 2 months ago
@AbleFoxCompany Are you telling me that when playing games you cannot tell the difference between 24fps and 100fps?
Also what has coca-cola and michael jackson got to do with anything?
TBH I give up with this Human eye fps debate because everyone likes to make up bollocks.
Do some research on the human eye and fps.
lolwut1337n355 2 months ago
@AbleFoxCompany LOL you're retarded. i hate you so much.
slamkam07 2 months ago
@lolwut1337n355 you're also fucking retarded, the human eyes cant perceive 200 fps.
slamkam07 2 months ago
@slamkam07 Go in flash, draw a square and create a motion tween 10 frames. Move the last frame 1/4 across the screen at 10 fps
Play it... Smooth yeh?
Now do the same but move the square last frame all the way to the right.
Play it... Laggy right?
Thats what happens in games. So unless you move the mouse as fast a sloth taking a shit, you should be able to notice the difference between 30 - 200fps.
Movies get away with 24fps because of motion blur.
lolwut1337n355 2 months ago
Comment removed
slamkam07 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lolwut1337n355 lol....dude. the human eye can't percieve over 100-150 fps, and it is very easy to tell the difference between fuckin 30 fps and 60. I have a GeForce 550 TI and Crysis can run at almost max settings at 80 fps, and when i put it up to max settings my fps goes down to 45 and it's very noticeable.
slamkam07 2 months ago
@lolwut1337n355 motion blur? ur talking complete bullshit, i am EDUCATED PROGRAMER, i know, human eye CAN NOT see above 24 fps(24 pictures per second if u dont know whats that), that is caused by inertia of the eye, when light reaches inner part of your eye there is a delay in which it stays in without going away, that delay is 1/24 second long, thats why u cant tell difference betwen 24 fps and anything above, because at bigger fps your eye will still only catch 24 frames of it in second.
jamariooo 2 months ago
@jamariooo Pause any film and you will see any object that was moving go blurry. Without motion blur, films would look choppy.
Games and other media need higher fps to look smoother.
Play an fps game at 24 fps, then 100fps on a decent monitor. Only then should you come back and comment.
lolwut1337n355 2 months ago
@lolwut1337n355 Over 60 FPS and it's impossible for the human eye to detect any change
TheParaxore 2 months ago
@TheParaxore I've done alot of research and that is BS.
lolwut1337n355 2 months ago
@TheParaxore The human eye does not see in frames. Also, difference between 120Hz and 60Hz monitors is huge (not "120Hz" TVs which are not actually 120Hz). There was even a test where Air Force pilots could identify a plane on a flashed picture that lasted for 1/220th of a second.
The whole "you can't see over 60 FPS" (wasn't it 30 FPS before?) is BS.
Genome852 2 months ago
@TheParaxore 70 fps~
Sasukerym 1 month ago
@jamariooo It has nothing to do with SEEING, it's about how the game feels at higher fps. Higher frames per second means better hitreg due to the hit boxes being updated every frame. 60 fps = 60 Hit box updates every second. 250 - 250 Hit box updates.
Also the higher the fps the better the game feels, you can jump higher, run faster without making any sound. And strafe :)
Zookei 2 months ago
How do i get 1000 fps when recording?
Ex0TiiCMw2 2 months ago
i can only get 119fps on cod 4
8justink 2 months ago
how can u know its 1000fps? the human eye cant even see 100 XD ! stupid fags^^
sincity4012 2 months ago
@sincity4012 because the computer detects the fps. A high fps makes the game feel more responsive and ensures that no fps drop will affect the smoothness ^^
akblabla 2 months ago
@sincity4012 you can tell by the slo-mo of the video. The slower and smoother the video the more the fps!
klapskates 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this fps is ONLY 1000!
KWADRATjt 2 months ago
wtf is fpsss
TheNinjaPaul 2 months ago