Why don't I see Blacklight Powered car or generator in the market? Rossi's e-cat is expected to get into commercial market by 2013. What's stopping Blacklight Power?
smackbabie Kids, this video is a fraud. Stay in school, keep your money. People ask why they don't simply sell stock to investers instead of asking for donations. If they sell stock they will have to answer to the stock holders. By asking for donations, the scamers won't have to answer to anybody. Oct 19, 2011 you have a Lot to learn about trading.
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
As a chemist, I can't help but to question the practical use of this. The fuel that you are using must be made by chemists, but then it is consumed without a truly impressive energy output. It is more rare than oil or bio-fuel, and yet it is less effective. My apologies for being the Devil's Advocate here, but I do not see this project taking off =/
its like besslers wheel they can do amazing things but they cant make a man honest. thats why they put a tax on propane so verizon vans had to stop useing it.magots in controll running everything 2012 the end fuck these mother fuckers i hope its true.but know if something happens its them doing it with harp or something. they push the sky 80 miles into space with it
@gibbo1112 Oh ok, did you live it ??? were you near when it blew up ?? did the pollutin reched your country and killed thousands ?? do you live next to Ukrain ???
@Tornciti oh i see why you are wingeing about this, you are from hungary... no i wasnt there, but i am also a physics student and was very interested in the events leading up to what happened. Frankly, i think that this ridiculous argument has been lead further and further off topic and would rather it stop than flood the inbox of the person who posted it.
@gibbo1112 hmmmm i dont know, 80% of our planet is covered in H2O, it is the most abundant element in the known universe, you drink it, you piss it, you bathe in it...you see where im going with this?
@99awd617dsm yea, but the issue is that to separate the hydrogen frome the oxygen you have to use electricity, and thena hydrogen fuel cell recombines them to makes slightly less electricity, is like a really crap battery...
..Continue...(pt2) soon we'll have absolute one.. It's the next big thing..Then people will realize we live in the first deminsion that continues in every direction for ever..just like gravity...you can have mass in a one dimensional thing. It just has no sides. that would require the first being inside an other continues dimension..first is the only one that can be continues..
LOL..you guys are Haters...even basic math that is tought in mid-school is wrong.. Math can be looked at in a quanity system and a place value system and number systems. Zero get all the hell messed up in all of it...your comupters don't know what to do with zero.. The only real numbers are -1,0,1. anything else is quantitive..LOOK now we have quantum physics...Wonder why kids have a hard time understanding something that has so many values as zero..
Need more proof other than a spike on a computer screen. I want to see it power a tesla coil and throw a spark across the room and cause a frozen cadaver burst into flames with the spike in energy.
Can you give us a little hint of how this 'blackliight' material is made of. Can we just scoop it from our septic tanks and grind the dried material and stuff it in those gadgets? Cost? The asian in the team was a little convincing ;-) but you need to try a little more than that.
Notice nobody says what the cost per 'blacklight powder' charge is or btu output? What waste products are produced in production of that powder? The corrosion, corruption, and toxicity of storage, handling, and activation? If you want a lot of heat nano thermites! But then, we know cost, wastes, handling dangers, toxicity, etc of that.
If you are going to continue tyrannical and money hungry tech then you can keep it. Don't pay for energy that should be free!!! No more Oppressive acts against Humanity.
I respect the orion project, but this video is just confusing. They call it a source of energy, then talk about putting electricity in and getting heat out. They compare it with burning hydrogen and don't even say what they are comparing. 200 times? 200 times what? Are those scientists? They do not sound like they know what they are talking about. This video makes no sense, call it stupidity or secrecy...
It is more likely that you cannot understand the video than it is that the video cannot be understood.
Read the description f00:
"The BlackLight Process generates more than 200 times the energy of burning hydrogen that can be harnessed to replace the thermal power in coal, oil, gas and nuclear power plants."
And at the end of the video:
6:26 "The ability to create 200 times the energy that is required to remove hydrogen from water or even sea water...."
"....and don't even say what they are comparing."
And that is false. They are comparing it with "the energy of burning hydrogen" and the "the energy that is required to remove hydrogen from water or even sea water", which are basically the same (if losses are negligible).
"You understand neither the video NOR my comment." You can't know if I understand it. You prefer to assume that I can't.
"They compare it with burning hydrogen and don't even say what they are comparing. 200 times? 200 times what? Are those scientists? They do not sound like they know what they are talking about."
In the video and the description, you can have your 2nd question answered w/o asking. But after answering your 2nd question for you, you said I didn't understand you or the video. Alas, you really do not understand the video, so the only reason why this video "makes no sense" would be you.
I laid out pretty clear the lack of information in this video.
Perhaps for you the sentence "in the evening it's colder than outside" is a comparison as well, but that doesn't change the fact that it's nonsense.
In the same fashion one has to give a REFERENCE when comparing the energy one can produce with substances. Weight, volume, molar mass and other possibilities come to mind. Learn to read. Pick up a physics book.
"Yeah, of course, it takes hours to say two additional words, dumfuck."
However, this directly contradicted what you said earlier:
"In the same fashion one has to give a REFERENCE when comparing the energy one can produce with substances. Weight, volume, molar mass and other possibilities come to mind."
Those "other possibilities" can in no way be treated properly in 7 minutes. Perhaps if you watched hour-long presentations on YouTube, you would understand this point.
Hmm. None of the claims are verifiable. Not to poo poo, but I would ask the producers to answer two questions.
1) How much energy is required to produce the blacklight stuff?
2) What do you do with the spent blacklight stuff?
Open, skeptical viewers should keep in mind that this chemical and its reaction with hydrogen are not themselves a mechanism of energy capture. Energy capture occurs before the shown experiment, in A) the sourcing of free hydrogen and B) the sourcing of the blklt chem.
Here's an interesting fact: every time you google one of the supposed companies that Blacklight Power has a contract with, one of the first results is Blacklight's press release announcing the deal. Only one of the supposed companies that they signed a contract with even has a homepage and it doesn't say anything about an electric plant division; it's a real estate company. Shades of Stephen Glass.
this is insane, the entire basis is putting energy in and receiving the exact same amount back. this is useless in getting energy from something. It is just an extremely thrifty (cant think of the right word) system.
OK guys, tell me why this isn't a dumb fraud. 200 times the energy of burning hydrogen, contrary to everything we know very clearly about hydrogen, with no explanation? And a big "please donate" link? Sure.
try to imagine, if we can cover 1/3 of our sea with solar panel, we can prevent or reduce f3 tornado, big storm and global warming. and i believe we don't need fosil fuel anymore, I just waited who will going to start it.
The system require external electric current to start the reaction. The solution is a salt like substance that has nickle and a small amount of hydrogen. Quantum energy outputs exceed predicted amounts. Most critics say the 50kw system is too small and want a 200kw system. Explain how the electron energy levels changed and are made possible to release more energy
make a self contained unit not a big power station, you just make more energy cartels by making a 50Kw unit..this is not free energy its only renewable energy by a power company selling it to you where it is free as the universe intended, make a home unit as a one off purchase grow up, humanity needs no corporations , GROW UP....F money man..or F U ill focus on the Steorn device
I never knew/imagined that such high-tech work was being done at Rowan University. All I knew of Rowan University was that it was renamed in honor of Henry Rowan for his large gift to the school from the money he made building induction furnaces. (thank you, wikipedia!)
@flowerbower I gave you a thumbs up. I had to do a little more reading on wikipedia. Though hardly a reliable source, the clues combined with my past knowledge of physics DOES suggest that this blacklight power does not work.
But, I am not so sure that it was a deliberate scam. I get the sense more like a subtle mistake. But, I don't have the time to go deeper into Blacklight power.
My time is better spent building more biodiesel plants based on proven existing tech.
@deskset24 It is a big problem: the general public never sees the millions of academic papers each year which explicitly or implicitly confirm the conservation laws. All that it sees are the conmen on YouTube, and old textbooks which it then incorrectly assumes to be 'out-of-date'. I suppose that his anti-gravity machine is also a subtle mistake ;-) For a physicist's assessment of BLP, read Voodoo Science by R.Park.
@flowerbower I meant, I'd have to look at the Blacklight video to see if they claim that they have created a perpetual motion energy (obviously impossible) or merely eked out another 1% efficiency. I don't want to falsely accuse them of making wild claims if they haven't.
@deskset24 Don't worry, BLP have made plenty of ridiculous claims; including a quantum-mechanical model, for the atom, which has absolutely no scientific validity. The original purpose of that was to 'explain' cold fusion. In effect, BLP is still pursuing the cold fusion scam.
@flowerbower No, no, no! I don't want to hear it! I don't want to hear it! (hands over ears) LA LA LA LA LA! (just kidding)
Seriously - sorry to hear that about them. In spite of wikipedia not being a peer-reviewed journal, I think it IS very often good. What I read about BLP on wikipedia did not look too flattering.
@flowerbower Well, then, I guess that proves that the BLP IS legitimate, since I saw mostly slander against BLP on wikipedia!
Yes, of course, everybody knows that's the problem with wikipedia.
However, for all practical purposes, how often is that done?
How many trolls actually CARE enough to go undo the incredibly careful words of a true expert on some obscure subject, such as the history of building harpsichords, JUST to screw it up?
@deskset24 You didn't see any slander on Wiki; how can one see speech? Nobody bothers to alter the 'boring' items; the changes are made mainly to political, and other inherently sleazy, entries.
@flowerbower Groan. Ok. So, don't call what I saw on wikipedia about Blacklight "slander". Call it "negative advertising". I don't care. My point is: it was negative.
Yes. You got my point: "nobody bothers to alter the 'boring' items". Bingo!
@deskset24 They should use a dictionary, as I do. Of course, the terms have become a little confused in the modern world because, if slander is recorded (on video, etc.), it then becomes libel even though the offender himself never wrote anything down.
@flowerbower Frankly, I believe everyone - the whole world - should become lawyers and become involved in defining these terms and in interpreting when events in the outside world fall or don't fall into those categories.
However, the essential property here is X (wikipedia) communicates negative information to Y (the world) about Z (Blacklight).
@flowerbower WHICH of the things that we discussed is a "strange" POV?
Certainly not my remark about police, judges & prison guards.
I, and probably lawyers, get sick of all the brainless lawyer-bashing. People just brainlessly join the bandwagon to bash them. But, instead, I choose to bash those who TAKE our taxes and who REALLY control & ruin our lives.
@flowerbower Then only criminals complain about lawyers, too, because lawyers (prosecutors) put them into prison.
People arrested by any totalitarian regime - such as Soviet USSR, North Korea, Iran, Peru, China, United Arab Emirates, and the USA - ARE criminals, by the definition of the laws of the regime under which they were arrested.
@deskset24 I read your exchange with @flowerbower with intrigue, as a political argument seemed to manifest from nowhere! Anyway, I agree that we have too many police, judges, and prison guards (not to mention lawyers). Very strange for the shining city on the hill to throw 1% of its population in prison, mostly related to unauthorized agriculture and trade.
To xadam: there is no vague mysterious "powers that be" that control all sources of energy. Yes, there are corporate bullies. Huge bullies. But they operate more like provincial "mafia" gangsters, each out for themselves, than one centralized authoritarian state. I'm as radical (even more so) than the next guy, politically, but I don't believe in complex conspiracies.
So, this is Rowan U in New Jersey, formerly Glassboro State College?
problem is no matter if any of these developments are real or not the powers that be will never let it come to market ..they will either buy it and suppress it or they will make sure there is no financing to bring it to market.. they have any number of agents working to discover and suppress new tech they judge a threat to the status quo..this happens not just in energy but also in medicine or any other tech / resource that they don't control
If I had the knowlegde to come up with some shit that's damn near impossible to disprove, I can get away with for 19+ years and which makes me 70million dollars of funding to "play with", I would do what this guy is doing.
I invented a breakthrough source of energy which violates the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of energy produced yearly $5400.
I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and $3M for patents.
Though at a base level for smaller operations it is good i believe the future of our species lies in mastering the Fusion of hydrogen isotopes. we have enough of that material available in sea water to quench energy needs of the world at todays rate for about 200000 years. That said you cannot use a fusion reactor to fuel a heavy vehicle where such techs could be used. tx for the upload.
What is this "blacklight material" ? That's the $60,000 question..How much work does it take to make the "blacklight material"...? What's the process, how much energy does it take? This blacklight material might be fecal material, as in BS.
@AquariaTV It's Nibbler's "steamers" from Futurama! (just kidding)
Unless these folks uncover and apply some new law of physics, they can never violate Conservation of Energy or the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Hence, they cannot claim (not saying that they do) to "get more energy out than they put in". No one can. All one can do is "improve upon the efficiency" over previous processes. I never see these fundamental calculations presented with any of these claims.
The question we should be asking here is "How much energy is used in producing this blacklight powder?" If the energy gain of the using the blacklight is the same amount of more energy required to produce the chemical, then it's really not worth it. It all boils down to economics of the company.
what is this black light powed made from? How much energy is used to create it? What waste or byproducts are there? In theory it sounds great but I'd like to see some numbers.
this guy john kanzius was using radio waves for cancer research and stumbled upon salt water becoming flammable he did this at his house so i see no reason why it can`t be converted for car engines i guess the salt water burns hydrogen. i would think you would need the radio frequency drivers in place of the spark plugs
Here is a the link (actually no links possible to publish here) for a paper produced by me, when the Bristish Aerospace invited me during 1998 (Greenglow project) to lecture at the Lancaster University in UK, for relevant topics: Go to National Technical University of Athens site then to the doubleu 3 times softlab.ntua.gr then at
~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.doc
It is classical physics, not super-difficult to read.
@DrKCostas Isn't it odd that mere engineers think that they can produce an antigravity machine, when no sane physicist can see any glimmer of such a possibility? BAe should stick to what it knows best: such as bribing foreigners to buy its planes. Perhaps if they had fewer flaky employees they could build better planes!
This whole thing is fraud on a disgraceful scale. It violates the laws of thermodynamics and quantum physics. Until they re-write these laws there is no point in pursuing such nonsense.
Your right why should we pursue anything that isn't written in our Thermodynamics text books. Science is for idiots, just read a book, it has all the answers right there in the back of the chapter.
@moorer21 As a sometime textbook-writer, I would be the first to agree that they are out-of-date, but only by the time-delay that publishers introduce. However, research scientists do not base their ideas only upon textbooks, but also upon the latest published papers. These days, a genuine new discovery can be assimilated within days: look at the case of 'room-temperature' superconductivity. Unfortunately, nonsense like 'cold fusion' wastes a lot of valuable time.
This video is uninformative in the extreme. It never explains what blacklight material is, but it goes on and on about details that make no sense without knowing what the hell is going on. "Here's some blacklight material, it goes into these tubes, and look at the screen! IT'S ALIVE!!"
Great, theoretically with this we can build a perpetual motion machine. LIES, obviously you have never taken a course in The LAWS of thermodynamics. once the laws of physics are re-written i MIGHT... NOT CARE. if this were true we would have free energy out the ass!
If I told you in 1900 that I could blow up a city with a few hundred kilos of Uranium would you have believed me.
Keep reading your text books and when you reach the end, then you can ask novel questions. Until then, continue believing everything you read, that will help us make progress for sure.
Firstly, Neither you nor I was alive in the nineteen-hundreds, which makes your first statement completely irrelevant, because neither you nor I know how i would react, unless this magical blacklight can send us back into time.
the only way to acquire energy is by harnessing or transferring it from an external source I.E. The SUN
If you want to see an actual way of creating energy look at the interesting work being done with fusion.
@moorer21 Did you know that chemical explosions and nuclear explosions are exactly 'parallel' in their phenomenology? So, any Victorian scientist could easily have foreseen the possibility of such a bomb; given the existence of a material having the correct properties. In fact, H.G.Wells predicted the development of just such a (chemical) super-bomb.
@jayandersons WOW....you are really...and I mean REALLY stupid aren't you? Did you just honestly say we would need a Steam Engine to make hydrogen in a car?!?!?! LMFAO!!!!!! wow....I rarely say this....but I am just speachless!!
@frankensteinmoneymac So let me get this straight frankensteinmoneymac, YOU are calling jayandersons stupid and YOU misspelled the word speechless....the comment editor identifies the error and you made it anyway. Nice one Einstein. Next time you want to insult someone for being stupid, try not to make yourself look stupid!
@EggaChoppaDooey Yep thats exactly what I'm saying...the guy said you needed a steam engine to make hydrogen.....and yes that is incredibly stupid! BTW I find spelling Nazi's really funny! I happen to be dyslexic, AND a member of Mensa....if you don't know what Mensa is look it up. I really have nothing to prove to anyone when it comes to how smart I am! Honestly, you're gonna harp on me 'cause I misspell a word in a comment! LOL!!!! Too funny!
The irony in your comment is that Einstein was dyslexic and early in his life (when he was his most productive) he couldn't barely read or spell. Hence his quote,
"Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking."
He wrote that for people like you. People who wish they were smart enough to create something novel, and think they can do so by reading a book.
@moorer21 I think that there is a huge difference between reading textbooks to find out what has been discovered, and what more might be discovered, and failing to believe them at all; which appears to be your approach.
BTW, Newtonian theories are STILL valid under the conditions for which they were first formulated. IF there is any magical new energy source, it will not be found within the limits of current investigations.
this (in the video) is all well and good, but what is their magical chemicals and what is the energy cost of there production? and you are right, over a kilogram of material for 280 watts. I bet you couldn't start your car with that.
These guys are very smart: they managed to produce 60 million dollars worth of bullshit. Even those 2 scientists who claimed they achieved nuclear fusion in a jar could not raise that much money.
Weren't cars at one time much more wasteful than they are now? Weren't they even more wasteful when the internal combustion engine was invented? Maybe it is a practical first step in right direction? Or maybe it is something to be learned from and make something else (other technologies) work even better. If you want solutions embrace the possibilities and discovered what works.. That is what science is about.
For once, an energy solution on youtube which isn't bullshit (ie magnetic generator free energy designs). I found out about this a few years ago and I'm really interested as it gives the possibility of using water for fuel.
I've been following Blacklight since 2001. For many reasons, I am convinced that they have achieved a means of producing initially "free" energy. It does not however violate the 2nd thermo law; this is where the potential "downside" comes in. Several power companies have signed contracts with BL. Mills is a cautious, well-connected dude with more cash at his disposal than most of us can imagine. His work has not escaped attention. I'm frankly surprised he released this video.
It does not violate the 2nd law. All free energy devices do only one thing - they convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass. The energy level is so high, you cannot measure the tiny amount of mass that is missing.
An accelerator is key to causing that reaction. I know how most free energy devices work and they all just do that conversion a variety of different ways.
Tesla, Puharich and Meyer made ozone using an accelerator and mixed with water vapor for H2o2 - it sheers.
Weren't there solar panels on the white house, or a nearby government house, in Washingon DC for a while? They removed them, probably because of a oil-friendly administration. I guess a democracy is as good as its voters, and if the voters are religious and less educated then the average on europe, good things doesn't happen. Why care about the environment if you wait for rapture, and why help hunger when there supposedly is a God's plan behind all this? Baka.
Apathy...is preached, enforced, and praised in this country...its is how we are controlled...hey how bout that nice little pyramid with a sun in it @ 0:10
It was not Bush, Jimmy Carter put them in and Regan tore them out because he thought saving energy was something the great American giant need not do.
Anywho, this BlackLight junk is about as valid as the Storn ORBO. I tihnk in this case the inventor is just in denial at the reality whereas ORBO is just snakeoil.
Hi buddies! I know a very very simple way to produce elecrticity from pure water without the consumption of any material. Just ask and I'll tell you briefly.
hey everyone i did a real tesla wireless energy transfer! i got 20 ft wireless maybe i can get 100 ft to a mile! this is important, i am lightning up a florecent light 20 ft away at a reciever coil! please everyone spread, we got to bring teslas work back to life before its to late! wireless power is the future if we learn it and build it!
the same as the Volta pile, but you have to use stailess conductors instead of zinc and copper. for example I use graphite and monocrystalline silicon. but you can do it also with ferrite or anything else that conducts electricity and doesn't rust or decompose in pure water. one day you will have to change the water or you have to use part of the energy you produce to reactivate the same water with electromagnetic waves... with a magnetron, but I still have to make experiments with this.
I'll believe it when I see it.
ztSHOCK 1 week ago
37 oil company executives dislike this video
N0rtyBen 1 week ago
Why don't I see Blacklight Powered car or generator in the market? Rossi's e-cat is expected to get into commercial market by 2013. What's stopping Blacklight Power?
samann95014 2 weeks ago
Blacklight "Powder" my ass
Lea71777 3 weeks ago
smackbabie Kids, this video is a fraud. Stay in school, keep your money. People ask why they don't simply sell stock to investers instead of asking for donations. If they sell stock they will have to answer to the stock holders. By asking for donations, the scamers won't have to answer to anybody. Oct 19, 2011 you have a Lot to learn about trading.
lowcarb85 1 month ago
what's the "blach energy powder"? gunpowder?
ampeyro 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
peopledick 2 months ago
As a chemist, I can't help but to question the practical use of this. The fuel that you are using must be made by chemists, but then it is consumed without a truly impressive energy output. It is more rare than oil or bio-fuel, and yet it is less effective. My apologies for being the Devil's Advocate here, but I do not see this project taking off =/
bodinian 2 months ago
its like besslers wheel they can do amazing things but they cant make a man honest. thats why they put a tax on propane so verizon vans had to stop useing it.magots in controll running everything 2012 the end fuck these mother fuckers i hope its true.but know if something happens its them doing it with harp or something. they push the sky 80 miles into space with it
1weside 3 months ago
They want your money.
Things are progressing very slowly....
You have to donate, now. Or tomorrow.
Things will progress a bit more once you donate.
But I think it will keep progressing.
Slow.
Just remember: please donate.
This project is going no where without you!
We're a circus. We're hiring clowns. We need you.
gukonni 3 months ago
Kids, this video is a fraud. Stay in school, keep your money.
People ask why they don't simply sell stock to investers instead of asking for donations.
If they sell stock they will have to answer to the stock holders.
By asking for donations, the scamers won't have to answer to anybody.
smackbabie 3 months ago
Where was the science or explanation of the science in this?
xTonyxMaddenx 4 months ago
(Note: You can get hydrogen from places other than water folks)
Anyway, dunno how trustworthy this "Blacklight" business is. I say put your interest in something more reputable. Like ITER.
AceOfDiamonds11 4 months ago
This video is completely fraudulent buzzword babble, it contains
NO meaning whatsoever!! Note that they want you to "donate"
meaning invest. They're just scamming you, don't believe this video!! Go study physics and you'll know this video is complete
bullshit! This is the video equivalent of spam email where they
give you a hard luck story and beg you for donations.
rstevewarmorycom 4 months ago
How expensive is it to produce one of these generators?
TimTwinblade 5 months ago
The white copper heater or w/e it is,, looks like a big expensive toilet paper roll. This technology is Amazing.
fobgalore 5 months ago
Strange that the actual energy source was glossed over.
What's in the powder?
ghuegel 5 months ago
so where are you gonna get the hydrogen?
gibbo1112 5 months ago
@gibbo1112
From water electrolysis.
ifreed0m 5 months ago 3
@ifreed0m where do you get the electricity for the electrolysis?
gibbo1112 5 months ago
@ifreed0m also from sea algea.
ChiefAdministrator 1 month ago
@gibbo1112 from water dubass
Tornciti 5 months ago
@Tornciti where do you get the electricity to get the hydrogen from the water dumbass?
gibbo1112 5 months ago
@gibbo1112 You plug it in the wall idiot you know like your pc .-.-
Tornciti 5 months ago
@Tornciti and where does that electricity come from?? :D escape routes are closing!!
gibbo1112 5 months ago
@gibbo1112 From safe and beautiful NUCLEAR Power!!!!
Tornciti 5 months ago
@Tornciti
1. not everywhere
2. nuclear waste
3. nuclear fuels are rarer than fossil fuels
4. chernobyl? three mile island? japan?
gibbo1112 4 months ago
@gibbo1112
what the fuck do you know about chernobyl ??????? You live more thousands of kilometers away...
Tornciti 4 months ago
@Tornciti why the hell should that mean anything? I'm studying modern history at uni, i did a paper on the Chernobyl disaster.
gibbo1112 4 months ago
@gibbo1112 Oh ok, did you live it ??? were you near when it blew up ?? did the pollutin reched your country and killed thousands ?? do you live next to Ukrain ???
Tornciti 4 months ago
@Tornciti oh i see why you are wingeing about this, you are from hungary... no i wasnt there, but i am also a physics student and was very interested in the events leading up to what happened. Frankly, i think that this ridiculous argument has been lead further and further off topic and would rather it stop than flood the inbox of the person who posted it.
gibbo1112 4 months ago
@gibbo1112 hmmmm i dont know, 80% of our planet is covered in H2O, it is the most abundant element in the known universe, you drink it, you piss it, you bathe in it...you see where im going with this?
99awd617dsm 1 week ago
@99awd617dsm yea, but the issue is that to separate the hydrogen frome the oxygen you have to use electricity, and thena hydrogen fuel cell recombines them to makes slightly less electricity, is like a really crap battery...
gibbo1112 1 week ago
I've never seen a more deluded presentation in my life!
MrMichaelEdie 5 months ago
lol
bevythefirst 6 months ago
..Continue...(pt2) soon we'll have absolute one.. It's the next big thing..Then people will realize we live in the first deminsion that continues in every direction for ever..just like gravity...you can have mass in a one dimensional thing. It just has no sides. that would require the first being inside an other continues dimension..first is the only one that can be continues..
killerbee04x 6 months ago
LOL..you guys are Haters...even basic math that is tought in mid-school is wrong.. Math can be looked at in a quanity system and a place value system and number systems. Zero get all the hell messed up in all of it...your comupters don't know what to do with zero.. The only real numbers are -1,0,1. anything else is quantitive..LOOK now we have quantum physics...Wonder why kids have a hard time understanding something that has so many values as zero..
killerbee04x 6 months ago
OK now make something worth watching.
PhilDobson2010 6 months ago
Need more proof other than a spike on a computer screen. I want to see it power a tesla coil and throw a spark across the room and cause a frozen cadaver burst into flames with the spike in energy.
KarasCyborg 6 months ago
Can you give us a little hint of how this 'blackliight' material is made of. Can we just scoop it from our septic tanks and grind the dried material and stuff it in those gadgets? Cost? The asian in the team was a little convincing ;-) but you need to try a little more than that.
BahoUtot 6 months ago
Yes, you put gun powder in a tube and it will get hot.
cybermarsactual 7 months ago
Bah!
drmoroe30 7 months ago
Notice nobody says what the cost per 'blacklight powder' charge is or btu output? What waste products are produced in production of that powder? The corrosion, corruption, and toxicity of storage, handling, and activation? If you want a lot of heat nano thermites! But then, we know cost, wastes, handling dangers, toxicity, etc of that.
doceigen 7 months ago
Does not work, not reproducible by other scientists, does not obey the laws of thermal dynamics.
frosted1030 7 months ago
If you are going to continue tyrannical and money hungry tech then you can keep it. Don't pay for energy that should be free!!! No more Oppressive acts against Humanity.
weleplaya 7 months ago
@beac310
They are progressing slowly but steadily on the path to commercialization. Go to blacklightpower[dot]com/new.shtml for details.
ifreed0m 8 months ago
@ifreed0m So, where is this project now.... 8/11/2011?
Scremph 5 months ago
@Scremph
Good question. I can only refer you to the above mentioned URL which is blacklightpower[dot]com/new[dot]shtml
ifreed0m 5 months ago
@ifreed0m Has anyone independently recreated your results?
Proteus6684 2 months ago
@Proteus6684 no because it's a scam
ampeyro 1 month ago
@beac310 they're getting shut down by the oil, gas, coal and maybe even the solar energy companies. that or they failed horribly. lol.
keglimp 8 months ago
@beac310 exactly. nowhere. forgotten.
jeebersjumpincryst 9 months ago
As it is. This means nothing. How much energy does it take to make the powder? Is the powder less toxic? Is making it less toxic?
TheMarkFellows 10 months ago
Instead of asking for donations, why cant you sell stock, which by the way you will have rated at a triple A first, honestly rated might I add!
mmaaxx1198 10 months ago 6
@mmaaxx1198 SOME OIL COMPANY BUY AND THERE IS NO MORE INNOVATION...
adcijoel 2 months ago
I respect the orion project, but this video is just confusing. They call it a source of energy, then talk about putting electricity in and getting heat out. They compare it with burning hydrogen and don't even say what they are comparing. 200 times? 200 times what? Are those scientists? They do not sound like they know what they are talking about. This video makes no sense, call it stupidity or secrecy...
trakkaton 1 year ago
@trakkaton
It is more likely that you cannot understand the video than it is that the video cannot be understood.
Read the description f00:
"The BlackLight Process generates more than 200 times the energy of burning hydrogen that can be harnessed to replace the thermal power in coal, oil, gas and nuclear power plants."
And at the end of the video:
6:26 "The ability to create 200 times the energy that is required to remove hydrogen from water or even sea water...."
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@kmarinas86
You understand neither the video NOR my comment.
trakkaton 1 year ago
@trakkaton
You said: "They compare it with burning hydrogen"
Which is right, but then you say:
"....and don't even say what they are comparing."
And that is false. They are comparing it with "the energy of burning hydrogen" and the "the energy that is required to remove hydrogen from water or even sea water", which are basically the same (if losses are negligible).
"You understand neither the video NOR my comment." You can't know if I understand it. You prefer to assume that I can't.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
Comment removed
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@trakkaton
"They compare it with burning hydrogen and don't even say what they are comparing. 200 times? 200 times what? Are those scientists? They do not sound like they know what they are talking about."
In the video and the description, you can have your 2nd question answered w/o asking. But after answering your 2nd question for you, you said I didn't understand you or the video. Alas, you really do not understand the video, so the only reason why this video "makes no sense" would be you.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@kmarinas86
Listen, your inability to READ is not MY problem.
I laid out pretty clear the lack of information in this video.
Perhaps for you the sentence "in the evening it's colder than outside" is a comparison as well, but that doesn't change the fact that it's nonsense.
In the same fashion one has to give a REFERENCE when comparing the energy one can produce with substances. Weight, volume, molar mass and other possibilities come to mind. Learn to read. Pick up a physics book.
trakkaton 1 year ago
@trakkaton
"Listen, your inability to READ is not MY problem."
Why type this if you think I can't read? Apparently you don't think through the implications of what you are saying.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@trakkaton
"Weight, volume, molar mass and other possibilities come to mind."
Those things you describe above are not usually disclosed in a video format except if if it is something like an hour long presentation.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@trakkaton
"I laid out pretty clear the lack of information in this video."
The reason is not simple incompetence but the obvious lack of time (7 minutes) which prevents a proper treatment of the said phenomenon.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@trakkaton
"In the same fashion one has to give a REFERENCE when comparing the energy one can produce with substances."
One could dump a lot of references, but even with commentary, such will not suffice for a 7 minute video.
And to merely speed up the speech in the video would help no one.
It is impossible to understand the very terse concepts presented by Blacklight Power unless one spend weeks trying to read it.
It's not like proving gravity; "hydrinos" cannot be proven with a video.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
If you are not completely confused by quantum mechanics, you do not understand it. John Wheeler.
It is safe to say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman.
If [quantum theory] is correct, it signifies the end of physics as a science. Albert Einstein.
I do not like [quantum mechanics], and I am sorry I ever had anything to do with it. Erwin Schrödinger.
Quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense. Roger Penrose.
Compared to quantum lit., Mills' nearly 2000 page book is terse.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@kmarinas86
Yeah, of course, it takes hours to say two additional words, dumfuck.
You are really stupid beyond description.
Now stop your incoherent babble.
I don't want to read your imbecilic trash ever again.
trakkaton 1 year ago
@trakkaton
"Yeah, of course, it takes hours to say two additional words, dumfuck."
"You are really stupid beyond description."
"Now stop your incoherent babble."
"I don't want to read your imbecilic trash ever again."
100% of what you gave me were platitudes and insults. This gives me an insight into your character.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@trakkaton
You said:
"Yeah, of course, it takes hours to say two additional words, dumfuck."
However, this directly contradicted what you said earlier:
"In the same fashion one has to give a REFERENCE when comparing the energy one can produce with substances. Weight, volume, molar mass and other possibilities come to mind."
Those "other possibilities" can in no way be treated properly in 7 minutes. Perhaps if you watched hour-long presentations on YouTube, you would understand this point.
kmarinas86 1 year ago
@trakkaton
"Perhaps for you the sentence "in the evening it's colder than outside" is a comparison as well."
The word "compare" is used often in sentences when it literally means "contrast". This usage is quite common. Is this point foreign to you?
kmarinas86 1 year ago
The man who got everything by giving everything!
jantjesjantje 1 year ago
Donate?
Enter all information freely to the community. Why?
1 You will serve the whole world population with it, and not just u few lucky basterds.
2 You will help save the world and nature. That will be a wonderful legacy to your children, instead of a lot of money in a dead world.
If you have success it will turn you into a wealthy world controlling jerk.
Make it free and I will serve you and a lot of people with me. With love, passion, commitment, and money. Now, that will make you rich!
jantjesjantje 1 year ago
Hmm. None of the claims are verifiable. Not to poo poo, but I would ask the producers to answer two questions.
1) How much energy is required to produce the blacklight stuff?
2) What do you do with the spent blacklight stuff?
Open, skeptical viewers should keep in mind that this chemical and its reaction with hydrogen are not themselves a mechanism of energy capture. Energy capture occurs before the shown experiment, in A) the sourcing of free hydrogen and B) the sourcing of the blklt chem.
shpensive 1 year ago
@shpensive,
Here's an interesting fact: every time you google one of the supposed companies that Blacklight Power has a contract with, one of the first results is Blacklight's press release announcing the deal. Only one of the supposed companies that they signed a contract with even has a homepage and it doesn't say anything about an electric plant division; it's a real estate company. Shades of Stephen Glass.
TheFlanker35 1 year ago
Randy's been claiming this thing is "just around the corner" for about twenty years now.
Duffytoler 1 year ago
THis sounds WAAAAY to good to be true
dillmon1 1 year ago
Still waiting.
lotanerve 1 year ago 2
this is insane, the entire basis is putting energy in and receiving the exact same amount back. this is useless in getting energy from something. It is just an extremely thrifty (cant think of the right word) system.
OnTheWhistle 1 year ago
and.. ?
16XDVDLaserDiode 1 year ago
OK guys, tell me why this isn't a dumb fraud. 200 times the energy of burning hydrogen, contrary to everything we know very clearly about hydrogen, with no explanation? And a big "please donate" link? Sure.
Come on, what's going on here?
EleanorHandcart 1 year ago 2
@EleanorHandcart
And some Universitys are in on the scam...
There would be research in China and all over the world if it would work.
heavyweather 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
try to imagine, if we can cover 1/3 of our sea with solar panel, we can prevent or reduce f3 tornado, big storm and global warming. and i believe we don't need fosil fuel anymore, I just waited who will going to start it.
chateytung 1 year ago
The system require external electric current to start the reaction. The solution is a salt like substance that has nickle and a small amount of hydrogen. Quantum energy outputs exceed predicted amounts. Most critics say the 50kw system is too small and want a 200kw system. Explain how the electron energy levels changed and are made possible to release more energy
davepamn 1 year ago
make a self contained unit not a big power station, you just make more energy cartels by making a 50Kw unit..this is not free energy its only renewable energy by a power company selling it to you where it is free as the universe intended, make a home unit as a one off purchase grow up, humanity needs no corporations , GROW UP....F money man..or F U ill focus on the Steorn device
ashtweth 1 year ago
I never knew/imagined that such high-tech work was being done at Rowan University. All I knew of Rowan University was that it was renamed in honor of Henry Rowan for his large gift to the school from the money he made building induction furnaces. (thank you, wikipedia!)
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 I never realised that it was so easy to buy off a university and thereby cause them to back pseudoscience.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower I gave you a thumbs up. I had to do a little more reading on wikipedia. Though hardly a reliable source, the clues combined with my past knowledge of physics DOES suggest that this blacklight power does not work.
But, I am not so sure that it was a deliberate scam. I get the sense more like a subtle mistake. But, I don't have the time to go deeper into Blacklight power.
My time is better spent building more biodiesel plants based on proven existing tech.
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 It is a big problem: the general public never sees the millions of academic papers each year which explicitly or implicitly confirm the conservation laws. All that it sees are the conmen on YouTube, and old textbooks which it then incorrectly assumes to be 'out-of-date'. I suppose that his anti-gravity machine is also a subtle mistake ;-) For a physicist's assessment of BLP, read Voodoo Science by R.Park.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower I meant, I'd have to look at the Blacklight video to see if they claim that they have created a perpetual motion energy (obviously impossible) or merely eked out another 1% efficiency. I don't want to falsely accuse them of making wild claims if they haven't.
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 Don't worry, BLP have made plenty of ridiculous claims; including a quantum-mechanical model, for the atom, which has absolutely no scientific validity. The original purpose of that was to 'explain' cold fusion. In effect, BLP is still pursuing the cold fusion scam.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower No, no, no! I don't want to hear it! I don't want to hear it! (hands over ears) LA LA LA LA LA! (just kidding)
Seriously - sorry to hear that about them. In spite of wikipedia not being a peer-reviewed journal, I think it IS very often good. What I read about BLP on wikipedia did not look too flattering.
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 The problem with Wiki is that just anybody can sneak in and change all of the 'impossibles' to 'possibles' lol.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower Well, then, I guess that proves that the BLP IS legitimate, since I saw mostly slander against BLP on wikipedia!
Yes, of course, everybody knows that's the problem with wikipedia.
However, for all practical purposes, how often is that done?
How many trolls actually CARE enough to go undo the incredibly careful words of a true expert on some obscure subject, such as the history of building harpsichords, JUST to screw it up?
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 You didn't see any slander on Wiki; how can one see speech? Nobody bothers to alter the 'boring' items; the changes are made mainly to political, and other inherently sleazy, entries.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower Groan. Ok. So, don't call what I saw on wikipedia about Blacklight "slander". Call it "negative advertising". I don't care. My point is: it was negative.
Yes. You got my point: "nobody bothers to alter the 'boring' items". Bingo!
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 Hmm, but you missed MY point: if it is written, it is libel rather than slander.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower I can't let you slide on this: where are you making all this stuff up?
"Slander is verbal" but "libel is written".
Different lawyers, laws, judges, politicians, academics use these words however they feel fit.
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 They should use a dictionary, as I do. Of course, the terms have become a little confused in the modern world because, if slander is recorded (on video, etc.), it then becomes libel even though the offender himself never wrote anything down.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower Frankly, I believe everyone - the whole world - should become lawyers and become involved in defining these terms and in interpreting when events in the outside world fall or don't fall into those categories.
However, the essential property here is X (wikipedia) communicates negative information to Y (the world) about Z (Blacklight).
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 It might be more useful all round if there were more physicists, and fewer lawyers.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower Certainly better if there were fewer police officers & judges & prison guards.
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 Very strange point of view for an honest person ...
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower WHICH of the things that we discussed is a "strange" POV?
Certainly not my remark about police, judges & prison guards.
I, and probably lawyers, get sick of all the brainless lawyer-bashing. People just brainlessly join the bandwagon to bash them. But, instead, I choose to bash those who TAKE our taxes and who REALLY control & ruin our lives.
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 Yes, certainly that remark. Only criminals - or those living under a totalitarian regime - would complain about judges, police etc.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower Then only criminals complain about lawyers, too, because lawyers (prosecutors) put them into prison.
People arrested by any totalitarian regime - such as Soviet USSR, North Korea, Iran, Peru, China, United Arab Emirates, and the USA - ARE criminals, by the definition of the laws of the regime under which they were arrested.
deskset24 1 year ago
@deskset24 I read your exchange with @flowerbower with intrigue, as a political argument seemed to manifest from nowhere! Anyway, I agree that we have too many police, judges, and prison guards (not to mention lawyers). Very strange for the shining city on the hill to throw 1% of its population in prison, mostly related to unauthorized agriculture and trade.
sparkloweb 10 months ago
To xadam: there is no vague mysterious "powers that be" that control all sources of energy. Yes, there are corporate bullies. Huge bullies. But they operate more like provincial "mafia" gangsters, each out for themselves, than one centralized authoritarian state. I'm as radical (even more so) than the next guy, politically, but I don't believe in complex conspiracies.
So, this is Rowan U in New Jersey, formerly Glassboro State College?
I'm impressed!
deskset24 1 year ago
It only works when you hang an Elvis poster in front of it.
ArtisanTony 1 year ago
problem is no matter if any of these developments are real or not the powers that be will never let it come to market ..they will either buy it and suppress it or they will make sure there is no financing to bring it to market.. they have any number of agents working to discover and suppress new tech they judge a threat to the status quo..this happens not just in energy but also in medicine or any other tech / resource that they don't control
xadam2dudex 1 year ago
If I had the knowlegde to come up with some shit that's damn near impossible to disprove, I can get away with for 19+ years and which makes me 70million dollars of funding to "play with", I would do what this guy is doing.
bubach85 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough source of energy which violates the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of energy produced yearly $5400.
I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and $3M for patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
Though at a base level for smaller operations it is good i believe the future of our species lies in mastering the Fusion of hydrogen isotopes. we have enough of that material available in sea water to quench energy needs of the world at todays rate for about 200000 years. That said you cannot use a fusion reactor to fuel a heavy vehicle where such techs could be used. tx for the upload.
sushanalone 1 year ago
What is this "blacklight material" ? That's the $60,000 question..How much work does it take to make the "blacklight material"...? What's the process, how much energy does it take? This blacklight material might be fecal material, as in BS.
I hope I'm wrong.
AquariaTV 1 year ago 2
@AquariaTV It's Nibbler's "steamers" from Futurama! (just kidding)
Unless these folks uncover and apply some new law of physics, they can never violate Conservation of Energy or the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Hence, they cannot claim (not saying that they do) to "get more energy out than they put in". No one can. All one can do is "improve upon the efficiency" over previous processes. I never see these fundamental calculations presented with any of these claims.
deskset24 1 year ago
too mutch energy wasted there are better alternative!
drbaltazar 1 year ago
i didn't see anything....fake 3:30
lizardmanstudios 1 year ago
The question we should be asking here is "How much energy is used in producing this blacklight powder?" If the energy gain of the using the blacklight is the same amount of more energy required to produce the chemical, then it's really not worth it. It all boils down to economics of the company.
leeblackharry 1 year ago
what is this black light powed made from? How much energy is used to create it? What waste or byproducts are there? In theory it sounds great but I'd like to see some numbers.
Mrcastleskeep 1 year ago
this guy john kanzius was using radio waves for cancer research and stumbled upon salt water becoming flammable he did this at his house so i see no reason why it can`t be converted for car engines i guess the salt water burns hydrogen. i would think you would need the radio frequency drivers in place of the spark plugs
commando7144 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is a the link (actually no links possible to publish here) for a paper produced by me, when the Bristish Aerospace invited me during 1998 (Greenglow project) to lecture at the Lancaster University in UK, for relevant topics: Go to National Technical University of Athens site then to the doubleu 3 times softlab.ntua.gr then at
~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.doc
It is classical physics, not super-difficult to read.
DrKCostas 1 year ago
@DrKCostas Isn't it odd that mere engineers think that they can produce an antigravity machine, when no sane physicist can see any glimmer of such a possibility? BAe should stick to what it knows best: such as bribing foreigners to buy its planes. Perhaps if they had fewer flaky employees they could build better planes!
flowerbower 1 year ago
This whole thing is fraud on a disgraceful scale. It violates the laws of thermodynamics and quantum physics. Until they re-write these laws there is no point in pursuing such nonsense.
Quintessence777 1 year ago
They said the same thing about Newtonian Physics.
Your right why should we pursue anything that isn't written in our Thermodynamics text books. Science is for idiots, just read a book, it has all the answers right there in the back of the chapter.
moorer21 1 year ago
@moorer21 As a sometime textbook-writer, I would be the first to agree that they are out-of-date, but only by the time-delay that publishers introduce. However, research scientists do not base their ideas only upon textbooks, but also upon the latest published papers. These days, a genuine new discovery can be assimilated within days: look at the case of 'room-temperature' superconductivity. Unfortunately, nonsense like 'cold fusion' wastes a lot of valuable time.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower - The formula they're using is likely this: v=05JTYmkhrMI
saintveil 1 year ago
This video is uninformative in the extreme. It never explains what blacklight material is, but it goes on and on about details that make no sense without knowing what the hell is going on. "Here's some blacklight material, it goes into these tubes, and look at the screen! IT'S ALIVE!!"
nine9s 1 year ago 2
When they will releease..
jhtrico1850 1 year ago
Great, theoretically with this we can build a perpetual motion machine. LIES, obviously you have never taken a course in The LAWS of thermodynamics. once the laws of physics are re-written i MIGHT... NOT CARE. if this were true we would have free energy out the ass!
kazooka1 1 year ago
If I told you in 1900 that I could blow up a city with a few hundred kilos of Uranium would you have believed me.
Keep reading your text books and when you reach the end, then you can ask novel questions. Until then, continue believing everything you read, that will help us make progress for sure.
moorer21 1 year ago
@moorer21
Firstly, Neither you nor I was alive in the nineteen-hundreds, which makes your first statement completely irrelevant, because neither you nor I know how i would react, unless this magical blacklight can send us back into time.
the only way to acquire energy is by harnessing or transferring it from an external source I.E. The SUN
If you want to see an actual way of creating energy look at the interesting work being done with fusion.
kazooka1 1 year ago
@moorer21 Did you know that chemical explosions and nuclear explosions are exactly 'parallel' in their phenomenology? So, any Victorian scientist could easily have foreseen the possibility of such a bomb; given the existence of a material having the correct properties. In fact, H.G.Wells predicted the development of just such a (chemical) super-bomb.
flowerbower 1 year ago
with the energy crisis going on nowadays, we must consider all the possibilities for efficient power and this looks very promising.
goodcommentguy 1 year ago
Your putting-a-small-tube-inside-a-bigger-tube experiment also defy the laws of quantum mechanics... Unless quantum mechanics is just wrong...
KidsSayNoobALot 1 year ago
Remember I was here.Thai
universetechnique 1 year ago
blacklight powDer/material??
oddsdiner 1 year ago
What is powder nickle? oxcide? must be rich in hydrogen...will need a steam engen to harnes power wont work in a car
jayandersons 1 year ago
@jayandersons WOW....you are really...and I mean REALLY stupid aren't you? Did you just honestly say we would need a Steam Engine to make hydrogen in a car?!?!?! LMFAO!!!!!! wow....I rarely say this....but I am just speachless!!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac So let me get this straight frankensteinmoneymac, YOU are calling jayandersons stupid and YOU misspelled the word speechless....the comment editor identifies the error and you made it anyway. Nice one Einstein. Next time you want to insult someone for being stupid, try not to make yourself look stupid!
EggaChoppaDooey 1 year ago
@EggaChoppaDooey Yep thats exactly what I'm saying...the guy said you needed a steam engine to make hydrogen.....and yes that is incredibly stupid! BTW I find spelling Nazi's really funny! I happen to be dyslexic, AND a member of Mensa....if you don't know what Mensa is look it up. I really have nothing to prove to anyone when it comes to how smart I am! Honestly, you're gonna harp on me 'cause I misspell a word in a comment! LOL!!!! Too funny!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
The irony in your comment is that Einstein was dyslexic and early in his life (when he was his most productive) he couldn't barely read or spell. Hence his quote,
"Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking."
He wrote that for people like you. People who wish they were smart enough to create something novel, and think they can do so by reading a book.
moorer21 1 year ago
@moorer21 I think that there is a huge difference between reading textbooks to find out what has been discovered, and what more might be discovered, and failing to believe them at all; which appears to be your approach.
BTW, Newtonian theories are STILL valid under the conditions for which they were first formulated. IF there is any magical new energy source, it will not be found within the limits of current investigations.
flowerbower 1 year ago
this (in the video) is all well and good, but what is their magical chemicals and what is the energy cost of there production? and you are right, over a kilogram of material for 280 watts. I bet you couldn't start your car with that.
TommyPrimate 2 years ago
These guys are very smart: they managed to produce 60 million dollars worth of bullshit. Even those 2 scientists who claimed they achieved nuclear fusion in a jar could not raise that much money.
grosquipue 2 years ago
too much energy is lost during the distribution process. avoiding producing energy in a common place sounds logical.
fsjal1 2 years ago
One more thing. Isnt a kilograme=2.2lbs . Thats for a light bulb for 7 hours he is sayin. If that's correct. That sounds crappy.
iceee187 2 years ago
how much does the hoover dam weigh?
bluehorse888 2 years ago
Weren't cars at one time much more wasteful than they are now? Weren't they even more wasteful when the internal combustion engine was invented? Maybe it is a practical first step in right direction? Or maybe it is something to be learned from and make something else (other technologies) work even better. If you want solutions embrace the possibilities and discovered what works.. That is what science is about.
tabletopphoto 1 year ago
Whats up with MIT. Number one in engineering schools and I hear nothing about them. At least on the level I'm looking for. ?.?
iceee187 2 years ago
For once, an energy solution on youtube which isn't bullshit (ie magnetic generator free energy designs). I found out about this a few years ago and I'm really interested as it gives the possibility of using water for fuel.
potheadpenguin 2 years ago
I've been following Blacklight since 2001. For many reasons, I am convinced that they have achieved a means of producing initially "free" energy. It does not however violate the 2nd thermo law; this is where the potential "downside" comes in. Several power companies have signed contracts with BL. Mills is a cautious, well-connected dude with more cash at his disposal than most of us can imagine. His work has not escaped attention. I'm frankly surprised he released this video.
gurujaketube 2 years ago
It does not violate the 2nd law. All free energy devices do only one thing - they convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass. The energy level is so high, you cannot measure the tiny amount of mass that is missing.
An accelerator is key to causing that reaction. I know how most free energy devices work and they all just do that conversion a variety of different ways.
Tesla, Puharich and Meyer made ozone using an accelerator and mixed with water vapor for H2o2 - it sheers.
QuarkToo 2 years ago
Is it just me or is this man just doing a lot of talking and not actually saying anything? He sounds like a snake oil salesman.
RAIDERS58th 2 years ago
With these "Big Oil" special interests paying off our politicians, no wonder we don't even have SOLAR ENERGY in place yet.
And the funny thing is, these payoffs don't even take place behind closed doors, so we can't even call it a conspiracy.
It's just stupidity on the part of the people.
dmix09 2 years ago 22
Weren't there solar panels on the white house, or a nearby government house, in Washingon DC for a while? They removed them, probably because of a oil-friendly administration. I guess a democracy is as good as its voters, and if the voters are religious and less educated then the average on europe, good things doesn't happen. Why care about the environment if you wait for rapture, and why help hunger when there supposedly is a God's plan behind all this? Baka.
darkultra 2 years ago 11
Precisely.
I laughed at your "Baka", lol that was appropriate. =)
dmix09 2 years ago
Spot on!
SuuperRay 2 years ago
Made yourself sound quite unintelligent there, love.
gatorama420 1 year ago
Comment removed
pnutty94 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apathy...is preached, enforced, and praised in this country...its is how we are controlled...hey how bout that nice little pyramid with a sun in it @ 0:10
pnutty94 1 year ago
@darkultra Yes. President Jimmy Carter had solar panels installed on the roof of the White House in Washington.
It was a very big "statement" about his own energy policy.
He made a lot of speeches and often said, flat out: "We must eliminate our need for foreign oil and develop alternative sources of energy."
That was 30 years ago. Such a long time ago, it is very frustrating.
When Ronald Reagan (Republican, of course), took office, he had the solar panels removed off of the White House.
8messa 1 year ago
@darkultra Well I know it was not bush who had them removed. Have you seen his ranch? Solor panels out the ass among several other things.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
@MrAwsome514
It was not Bush, Jimmy Carter put them in and Regan tore them out because he thought saving energy was something the great American giant need not do.
Anywho, this BlackLight junk is about as valid as the Storn ORBO. I tihnk in this case the inventor is just in denial at the reality whereas ORBO is just snakeoil.
Harizl 1 year ago
@Harizl I was talking about the solar panels that are on Bush's ranch not the ones that used to be on the white house.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
@darkultra haha you are funny
legaleyesgreen 1 year ago
Hi buddies! I know a very very simple way to produce elecrticity from pure water without the consumption of any material. Just ask and I'll tell you briefly.
steblizz 2 years ago
hey everyone i did a real tesla wireless energy transfer! i got 20 ft wireless maybe i can get 100 ft to a mile! this is important, i am lightning up a florecent light 20 ft away at a reciever coil! please everyone spread, we got to bring teslas work back to life before its to late! wireless power is the future if we learn it and build it!
boxa888 2 years ago 2
go on dude! you rule!
steblizz 2 years ago
hey, it's NEVER too late to do anything!!
wahtahaya 2 years ago
how do you make power put of pure water?
bloodyzach 2 years ago
the same as the Volta pile, but you have to use stailess conductors instead of zinc and copper. for example I use graphite and monocrystalline silicon. but you can do it also with ferrite or anything else that conducts electricity and doesn't rust or decompose in pure water. one day you will have to change the water or you have to use part of the energy you produce to reactivate the same water with electromagnetic waves... with a magnetron, but I still have to make experiments with this.
steblizz 2 years ago
This is SNAKE OIL people! Fake! They just contradicted Einstein's theory of relativity which means it's FAKE! FAKE! FAKE!
Some BIG OIL people should shut em down!!!!
Down with BlackLIght! *Thumbs down*
toastyovens 2 years ago
Comment removed
ProudToBLoud 2 years ago