Fuck off conspiracy nut.. Im sure there is a perfectly logical reason why they can't transfer coloured pictures. However, you will most likely ignore that explenation and continue your mindless conspiracy rant.
Ur the fucking dumb ass. For 50 euro´s I can buy a digicam that make 4500x3600 true color high res pics. Ur think NASA has perfect explenation why they cant send back true color pics. Follow ur government dumb ass. Buy the oil, vote for Bush, drink your beer in the weekends and go to your Nescar races. Enjoy life.
You really think the type of camara has to do with the distance by which the data of the pic has to be send? Think twice. Ever heard of radio waves maybe?
And by the way, the one who is narrowminded is you, for you follow blindly what NASA tells you without exploring other data that has been available for more then 30 years. And throwing in the 2012 thing is pretty lame, for that is a whole other discussion that has nothing to do with your statement how data travels 402,336,000 kilometres.
u r all dum asses the reason when they took blanck and white photos because the bite rate in't fast info for the set up they had on that day also the direct link with oddeys or what every spacraft was abve it at that time was too short so u all who are fucking dum fucks shut the fuccck up and fuvking read
During the first few data transfers, the emphasis is on making sure engineering data, recorded during the entry, descent and landing, is sent back first. This is crucial because if a mishap occurs early, you need to make sure you've retrieved that data first. "Pretty color pictures" might entertain impatient people with little minds, but the first priority is making sure the craft is performing properly and can begin doing science.
I know the color pictures are here. Would you please do something for me? Maybe this will change ur mind. Look on google for these next 3 points. NASA and ESA say these 3 pictures are TRUE color pictures from the martian surface. TRUE means TRUE. No excuse for filters, no excuse for how the light reacts on the lens and no excuse for a different camera. TRUE color means TRUE color. Google for the next offcial NASA and ESA pictures:
Oh please, not that laughable old "face on Mars" conspiracy crap again. The nutters must be grasping for straws these days, if the best they've got is "these B&W photos prove NASA is lying to us".
It seems like this was a leftover prove from another Mars polar mission then upgraded to avoid another crash...But like you said...There are still few suckasses within NASA thinking that they can toy with information...
yeh i remember.
hahanikka 2 years ago
fake
hahanikka 2 years ago
I agree. Remember all the Internet buzz in 97 when people could see mars on their PC. Well It looked Fake!
tealmarlin 2 years ago
the usa claims mars and the moon
the chineses want to bay the moon from the usa
they want to open 30 panda express up there
the problem is that how the hell are they gonna fly up there
they might built a space ship the problem is that if they ever built one, that shit is gonna break half way up there
like everything they make
22bryant 3 years ago
isnt that Iraq?
narcotect 3 years ago
rofl
geo1616 3 years ago
No USA
Qadisya 3 years ago
thts sick
Kozak206 3 years ago
Nice photoshopping Nasa!
darthconvader 3 years ago
A trillion dollars of high tech space stuff and all they can give us are black and white pics.
NASA - Never A Straight Anwser
2013andBeyonD 3 years ago
Fuck off conspiracy nut.. Im sure there is a perfectly logical reason why they can't transfer coloured pictures. However, you will most likely ignore that explenation and continue your mindless conspiracy rant.
neverhoodyn 3 years ago 2
Ur the fucking dumb ass. For 50 euro´s I can buy a digicam that make 4500x3600 true color high res pics. Ur think NASA has perfect explenation why they cant send back true color pics. Follow ur government dumb ass. Buy the oil, vote for Bush, drink your beer in the weekends and go to your Nescar races. Enjoy life.
2013andBeyonD 3 years ago
Please, stop being so narrow minded. Things are not as simple as you think.
Can your 50 euro cam send high quality color pictures from a distance 402,336,000 kilometres. I think not.
We will see who is right after 2012.
neverhoodyn 3 years ago 5
You really think the type of camara has to do with the distance by which the data of the pic has to be send? Think twice. Ever heard of radio waves maybe?
And by the way, the one who is narrowminded is you, for you follow blindly what NASA tells you without exploring other data that has been available for more then 30 years. And throwing in the 2012 thing is pretty lame, for that is a whole other discussion that has nothing to do with your statement how data travels 402,336,000 kilometres.
2013andBeyonD 3 years ago
u r all dum asses the reason when they took blanck and white photos because the bite rate in't fast info for the set up they had on that day also the direct link with oddeys or what every spacraft was abve it at that time was too short so u all who are fucking dum fucks shut the fuccck up and fuvking read
GlobalWarmings 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
All you can do is copy talk what the NASA guys are saying. Nothing more.
2013andBeyonD 3 years ago
Tell you what, when you're smart enough to send your own probe, let us know what you find.
Until then, save the conspiracy nonsense for the Art Bell crowd.
HeyKidPullMyFinger 3 years ago 5
During the first few data transfers, the emphasis is on making sure engineering data, recorded during the entry, descent and landing, is sent back first. This is crucial because if a mishap occurs early, you need to make sure you've retrieved that data first. "Pretty color pictures" might entertain impatient people with little minds, but the first priority is making sure the craft is performing properly and can begin doing science.
Oh, and your color pictures are here now.
Happy?
v16050118130114 3 years ago
I know the color pictures are here. Would you please do something for me? Maybe this will change ur mind. Look on google for these next 3 points. NASA and ESA say these 3 pictures are TRUE color pictures from the martian surface. TRUE means TRUE. No excuse for filters, no excuse for how the light reacts on the lens and no excuse for a different camera. TRUE color means TRUE color. Google for the next offcial NASA and ESA pictures:
* viking 1 1976
* ESA Cydonia
* Eberswalde delta mars
2013andBeyonD 3 years ago
Oh please, not that laughable old "face on Mars" conspiracy crap again. The nutters must be grasping for straws these days, if the best they've got is "these B&W photos prove NASA is lying to us".
LordFuhquaad 3 years ago 5
Get my point? It can not be ALL 3 colors at the same time. NASA is denying AND confirming 3 colors about how the martian surface looks like.
I dont even care if you´re a rocket engineer explaning a trillion complex techical reasons why every offcial TRUE color pic looks different. They lie.
2013andBeyonD 3 years ago
are we sure this is mars and not on earth???
hotstudguy 3 years ago
The "American are so stupid" crowd is very quiet over this triumph.You can hear a rat crapping on cotton ball over this in Europe
LITEBRITE65 3 years ago
What are you talking about DUMB FUCK..? Does Europe matters ???
Darealwhip 3 years ago
What´s this?
The fourth picture strongly increases. Right above below horizon. A bright or reflecting staff or article, which is that?
wassermannzeitalter 3 years ago
Why in the hell are they showing black and white? C'mon HD is not too much to ask for...I know you are using it and yet we get black and white.
nightowl3012 3 years ago
It seems like this was a leftover prove from another Mars polar mission then upgraded to avoid another crash...But like you said...There are still few suckasses within NASA thinking that they can toy with information...
Darealwhip 3 years ago
was that sarcasm?
sjam99 3 years ago
amazing
ChineseDickFingers 3 years ago