Added: 4 years ago
From: FightingAtheist
Views: 1,717,881
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (297,053)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @grannyvonng Sorry granny, I needed to form my question better because you like to misunderstand them on purpose. If god is not appeased what problem(s) does that cause for god? Insomnia?, anxiety attacks?, impotency? Clouded thinking or confusion? Loss of night vision? Seriously, if god goes unappeased what is the peril for HIM?

  • atheists push people away from faith ,in return they give the emptiness of heart and nothing .They think they are wise,pride ,and that they are owe everything of themselves ,that rose from nothing and later they will be nothing again :-)) ,,The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall .goodness and love ,wisdom does not come from nothingness. START from ,,The Divine Mercy Devotion? - EWTN ,, find it on google

  • @kongo4527

    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    Leaving religion, which is simply one particular superstition, let me remove the blinders. I now revel in the freedom to explore reality as it is rather than how my religion allows it. No more must I deny so many fundamental facts of science, or feel compelled to "convert" those around me.

    Realizing there is no god, at least as described by religion, has been the most refreshing experience of my life!

  • Life is short, do you think you know everything?One day when your life will end,(Imagine simply, such a day )you will have? many questions and fears .search path of truth and life, now when you have time .Be smart !Eternal life is found only in the Lord Jesus Christ, the Savior of the world .You can start searching truth :,,A DYING MANS LAST WORDS, A MESSAGE FROM GOD on you tube A Muslim's Conversion to Christianity - Part 2 .etc please search !!!

  • @kongo4527 "do you think you know everything". No, that seems to be the view held by the religious.

    "One day when your life will end". We know.

    "Eternal life is found only in the Lord Jesus Christ". Who?

    "A Muslim's Conversion to Christianity - Part 2 .etc please search ". Why?

  • @kongo4527

    No thank you. From one superstition to another. I've noticed that Christians fear death as much as everybody else. That's not surprising--as a Christian, I feared death, too, mostly because I love life so much. Now that I realize Christianity's god is no more likely than Scientology's, my feelings of death are no different.

    Ask yourself this simple question about your religion: is there sound, empirical evidence for it? That's what matters. Lets live in truth.

  • @SuperQweertyuiop

    OR....we could just mark you as SPAM.

    Oops...TOO LATE

  • "In the beginning God created..." Now we are talking!

    In other words, folks, he believes in magic. Nothing complicated -- that would require thought, and logic, and effort. Nope. "poof" is good enough for this religious ignoramus.

  • Here's a quote from a so called "intelligent" atheist:

    "The transition nothing-to-something is a natural one, not requiring any external agent."

    Wow, if this isn't the epitome of absolute human stupidity and ignorance, I don't know what is.

    "Dare wuz dis vacume, ware dare wuz nuttin, and den dare waz all of sudden sumtin, and dat my fwends is dah buety of it awl."

    "In the beginning God created..." Now we are talking!

  • @peterpulpitpounder Clearly they must have more reasoning behind that one sentence, and if not then it doesn't matter. Even if we don't have a solid idea on what happened, it doesn't make your God any more believable.

  • @peterpulpitpounder

    What you're soughing off is comes from evidence and advanced math. It's the same science that puts rockets in orbit and cell phones in in hand yet you cast it aside in favor of you religious gibberish, devoid of any evidence whatsoever.

    So sad.

    You're the hick in the science lab "waz dis vacume, I don't belief if no vacume..."

    Keep on regurgitating your ignorant bullshit and we'll happily keep laughing.

  • @peterpulpitpounder

    So let me get this straight. Because we don't yet have definitive answer to where it all came from, beyond the Big Bang, that somehow manages to twist your arm into believing that some unevidenced 'god' surely must be behind it?

    Yet, you have no issues in believing that this god 'always was', but find it impossible for simpler things to have always been around in some form or another?

    RIGHT!!

  • @DarwinsFriend:"Fear.

    Obedience.

    Soft Headedness.

    Limited Questioning.

    Pointless Tithing.

    (The other cylinders of their very meek engine for Jesus.)"

    Very good!

    p.s. It was marked as spam :(

  • @peterpulpitpounder "In the beginning God created..." Now we are talking!"

    A shame your book of miracles doesn't delve so deeply into the explanation on *how* God went about creating everything. I wonder why?

    Your Bible would be that much more reliable if it actually had such explanations. That would count as circumstantial evidence in favor of what it attempts to put forward. The fact that ti doesn't further suggest that the stories compiled in it are human invention.

  • @OmegaCause *it

  • @peterpulpitpounder ""Dare wuz dis vacume, ware dare wuz nuttin"". You do realise that even in a vacuum, there is an enormous amount of activity going on, don't you?

  • THE PROOF OF THE AUTHENTICITY OF A PROPHET OF JESUS CHRIST IS WHEN THE PROPHET PROCLAIMS A VISION THAT " WILL " COME TO PASS AND IT DOES. CERTAIN VISIONS GIVEN TO A PROPHET OF THE LORD ARE NOT GUARANTEED TO OCCUR IF THE VISION INCLUDES THE WORDS " THE PEOPLE MUST REPENT OF ..." AND THE PEOPLE RESPOND IN REPENTANCE. ANYONE PREDICTING THE DAY OF THE RAPTURE ARE TO BE IGNORED BECAUSE JESUS CHRIST CLEARLY SAID NO ONE KNOWS THAT DAY EXCEPT GOD HIMSELF.

  • @40something100

    I don't see how it's *any* of your business to involve yourself between two consenting adults, and nor do I see that they owe you any explanation behind their homosexuality. Mind your own business.

  • @OmegaCause

    It's gross, plain and simple.

  • @40something100 "if society defines morality then in effect there is no morality...".

    Wrong. If religion has no authority on morals, than morality then becomes subjective. It's always been subjective. Christians, even diehard fundamentalists arbitrate between competing moral values, picking/choosing which preachment's to follow and which to disregard. Slavery and slave trading at one point was considered fine, now it's not. The principles tend to change and shift as society itself does.

  • @grannyvonng

    Really? So you think homosexuality, if left alone, would result in the demise of our species?

    The number of humans who exist on earth today exceeds that of seven billion. The contended number of homosexuals being in such a minority that they could not even have any effect on the collapse of humanity whatsoever. So your stand along with Pope Benedict's stance that the gay community will reduce the population so significantly that we'll face extinction is absolutely asinine.

  • @OmegaCause ...So you think homosexuality, if left alone, would result in the demise of our species?...

    No more than oral and anal sex has between heterosexuals.

  • @40something100 Consenting adults don't owe your opinion any consideration when their behavior behind closed doors, can't be shown by you, to be detrimental to others or to degrade the society so much that we would stoop to taking away the liberty of others to pursue their own happiness. It affects YOU so little and you are so impotent to change it to your preference you are coming off as nothing better than a bigot.

  • @grannyvonng

    -

    Most preachers would tell you that birth is a miracle, and this miracle of course occurs 358,192 times per day (quite common, obviously). Of course, these preachers and adherents of theism will say as such, because they stand by the assumption that a supernatural soul has taken corporeal form despite having no evidence of such. Do they also define infants born with deadly genetic abnormalities, in which they nor the parent can be at fault over also as a miracle? No. Of course not.

  • @OmegaCause

    Technically speaking, birth is not a miracle, but a wondrous and glorious occurrence. I would say that "most" preachers, if dubbing it as such, apply the term very loosely. A miracle is when God suspends natural law and performs something supernatural, so as to confirm, substantiate or mark out something. Miracles have been the rarity over the course of human history.

  • @peterpulpitpounder:"birth is not a miracle, but a wondrous and glorious occurrence"

    How is a birth, which is so COMMON, something to be considered "glorious"???

  • @peterpulpitpounder So it logically follows that if an omnipotent God can both preserve freewill and eliminate the problem of evil (i.e as he apparently does in heaven), and the fact that he chooses not to do so here, suggests to me that either this God does not exist, or, he is inherently sinister to a fault.

    So, which side do you veer towards?

  • @peterpulpitpounder "A miracle is when God suspends natural law and performs something supernatural.."

    Which hasn't happened, since there hasn't been a single instance that we know of where the natural order of things were suspended. So according to your definition of what a "miracle" constitutes, it doesn't happen. Instead, you have testimonials from men who attest that such miraculous wonders did in fact occur. Let me ask you this: why are these events no longer happening?

  • @OmegaCause

    Okay, so let me see how this works. Let's say you experience a legitimate miracle from God. Let's say you have a grossly oversize nose, which has caused you embarrassment since preschool, and God reshapes it instantly. Your whole family and community rejoice. A hundred years pass, and someone hears about what happened and says, "That's a fairy tale." Did it then not happen? Unfortunately, you did not live in the days of Christ, and were not an eyewitness of His power.

  • @peterpulpitpounder

    My answer would be simply that if someone truly experienced what you would call a "suspension" of natural law, and then testified to this, and if people doubted as such, then they're doubt is perfectly reasonable. A revelation was made not to them, but to someone else.

  • @peterpulpitpounder I did say that based on your rendition of what makes a "miracle" a miracle, the suspension of reality as far as we know it, hasn't happened. Odd how such miraculous wonders transpired thousands of years ago, and yet with the progression of science and innovation these miraculous wonders apparently, can no longer be seen. Why is that? That to me suggests that the miracles and testimonials of men during that age were likely exaggerated and embellished.

  • @peterpulpitpounder Furthermore, I'm not interested in the testimonials of people who converted to a religion, even if these converts before were atheists. Everyone has instances of weakness in which emotion overrides reason. So if you intend to try to convince me, why not begin by explaining what logic and evidence persuaded you to join in the first place. If you're unable to do this, then your testimony as well as those centuries/millennia removed will be ineffectual to me.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "...and God reshapes it instantly...Did it then not happen?"

    No, because such features don't get reshaped instantly, except through natural forces such as motor accidents. Such reshaping doesn't usually result in desirable features.

    "Unfortunately, you did not live in the days of Christ, and were not an eyewitness of His power". Strangely enough, I am yet to learn of a single reliable eyewitness to Christ.

  • @OmegaCause (24k gold)

  • @peterpulpitpounder

    While it would be completely sensible to assume there is no god, I don't, and nor do I need to. There simply is no reason to believe that a god exists. There has never been a single credible proponent of theism, because there has never been a single argument of evidence which would support any of the claims presented which would support their theism. The claims espoused, since antiquity, have been unsupportable and untestable, and remain so.

  • @OmegaCause

    That's the most ridiculous, confined and unwarranted claim I've ever heard. The fingerprint of God is everywhere, starting with the very breath issuing forth from you mouth. And you want people to believe something came from nothing? I mean that's what atheism must affirm and accept, and it is a premise of the most ridiculous sort. Life cannot come from nothingness.

    In the end we are all forced to admit that there must be a God. You WILL admit this someday.

  • @peterpulpitpounder:"The fingerprint of God is everywhere"

    To the contrary, you guys invented your god, then cherry pick the world to find anything that would fit your unsupported paradigm, asserting that nature is proof of your god.

    Talk about doing things totally ass-backwards

  • @AtheistToothFairy

    The heavens declare his glory.

  • @peterpulpitpounder:"The heavens declare his glory"

    1. The "heavens" clearly indicate a non-planned theme, but instead a very NATURAL outcome of the Big Bang event.

    2. If god planned our universe, then he not only made the cosmos vastly too large for just US, but made our planet and existence look very much like chance instead.

    3. Explain to us why god needed to make BILLIONS of galaxies, just to house US

  • @AtheistToothFairy "3. Explain to us why god needed to make BILLIONS of galaxies, just to house US..."

    He can't. And he's likely to provide an explanation which acts more as a diversionary tactic than attempting to actually address the question at hand. That's one of the things the late Hitchens discussed. Theists will always find *some* way to spin-doctor their religious beliefs, irrespective to reality. He called it "an infinitely elastic airbag".

  • @OmegaCause:"Theists will always find *some* way to spin-doctor their religious beliefs, irrespective to reality"

    Reality is like this huge obstacle to their weak minds and they'll do anything to avoid addressing this obstacle, all while in pursuit of their sick fantasy and unholy book

  • @AtheistToothFairy I can understand why they cling to such stories. They simply want something to believe in - something beyond and above them. Their beliefs give them hope and provide them comfort in the face of imminent death.

    However, when they openly discuss their beliefs, they should expect that many will disagree with them, and state their reasons for doing so.

  • @OmegaCause:"However, when they openly discuss their beliefs, they should expect that many will disagree with them"

    In my many years of debunking wild (woo woo) claims, I've discovered that people have no shame in presenting these crazy-ass idea on the net, as if one puts it in writing in a public forum means it has to be true. Go Figure

  • @OmegaCause One day Earth will perish - so they will have the answer to their fear, everything they've built their irrational fear/life around.

    This is like the 13 year old that doesn't have the spine to get out on the dance floor with the opposite sex and risk your ego. You stand on the sidelines and mock those that do. Theists employ this same tactic in their adult life and shield their pathetic existences from reality.

    If you go out and grab life by the throat - they really hate you.

  • @AtheistToothFairy I also like how you referred to the Bible as an unholy book, lol. To call something unholy is to admit that there are things that are holy. You're so religious, and that means you have a weak and feeble mind. You are so easily manipulated. Wake up and realise that your imaginary god is a myth, you deranged psychotic theist.

  • @SuperQweertyuiop:"To call something unholy is to admit that there are things that are holy"

    You're so typical a theist, in that you can't fathom how we can argue from within the context of your own dogma.

    There is nothing 'holy' or 'unholy' in reality, but xtians assume god is 'holy' (whatever that means) which is totally wrong given his history with people and our planet.

    i.e. The bible ASSUMES certain things are 'holy'. I take the opposite stance

  • @AtheistToothFairy You are an idiot. I was trolling you. I even admitted to trolling you. Why are you still responding? lol

  • @SuperQweertyuiop:"I even admitted to trolling you. Why are you still responding?"

    Just because you're an obvious troll, doesn't mean a Fundie wouldn't take make some of the same stupid arguments that you, the troll did

  • @AtheistToothFairy Bad stoopid troll victim, bad! Smart people don't respond to trolls. Also, don't you remember me? I have like, 10+ pages devoted to trolling you and some others on this video. You people are too easy!

  • @peterpulpitpounder ...The fingerprint of God is everywhere, starting with the very breath issuing forth from you mouth...

    And ending with 250,000 people having their heads and bodies bashed by a million tons of debris - allowing the lungs to expel the very last breath from their mouth - via His standing stupidly and silently by as a tsunami inundated 2,600 miles of coastline?

  • @DarwinsFriend God evidently knows where wicked people choose to vacation.

  • @AlanIsHarmony Yeah - Pat thinks so too.

    "I would warn Orlando that you're right in the way of some serious hurricanes, and I don't think I'd be waving those flags in God's face if I were you, This is not a message of hate -- this is a message of redemption. But a condition like this will bring about the destruction of your nation. It'll bring about terrorist bombs; it'll bring earthquakes, tornadoes, and possibly a meteor." – Pat Robertson, on "gay days" at Disneyworld

  • @peterpulpitpounder "The fingerprint of God is everywhere.."

    If what I say can be dismissed as being ridiculous, then show me how.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "starting with the very breath..."

    And you ascribe the credit to God for this, correct? Let me ask you this: what's stopping me from simply saying that the mechanics behind breathing (which in no way resemble I.D) resulted from by evolutionary means, and not by an intelligent designer?

    Would you also rightly give credit to God for also allowing children to be born with Klinefelter Syndrome? Does that bear the mark of intelligent designing?

  • @OmegaCause

    I would say you are one ignorant and unlearned soul, duped, deceived and deluded. A steady diet of empty humanism has impaired your cognitive functions.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "I would say you are one ignorant and unlearned soul.."

    Do you really believe throwing out red herrings further advances your argument? It doesn't. It only proves how flimsy and lacking your foundation really is.

    "A steady diet of empty humanism..."

    What leads you to believe that those who are agnostic or atheist are empty of humanism? Atheists can learn to appreciate the world, respect people, and live life no differently than a theist.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "And you want people to believe something came from nothing?..."

    That's a very common canard made by theists who intend to misrepresent what we actually think. Who is claiming that "everything" arose out of "nothing"? Certainly not I nor any theist on this forum has ever even so much as hinted this.

    If anything, proponents of I.D and creationism are the one's who are really saying everything was just conjured up out of ex nihilo.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "Life cannot come from nothingness..."

    And once again, neither I nor any atheist/agnostic here on this forum is asserting this. So your attacking a strawman.

    "there must be a God..."

    Neither I nor you knows this. You've already demonstrated that your willing to overlook what dispenses with or contradicts the idea that intelligent design is prevalent.

    "You WILL admit this someday..."

    Apparently, you know me better than I do.

  • @OmegaCause

    If there is no God, no Creator, why is there something rather than nothing?

  • "you have not been endowed with powers to summon or dismiss spirits"

    You gotta laugh at this stuff. Self delusion exemplar. Invoking magical nonsense then caveating that only works through special people is no different than admitting that it doesn't exist at all.

    Such religious nonsense is just as dismissible as that of the scientologists, the witches, the muslims, and on and one.

    Fantasy makes a great movie, but it makes the religious look plain stupid.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "Yes, and He created you...".

    Do you really think a stated claim itself is it's own evidence? It isn't. A claim requires evidence to support it for it to be consider valid. Otherwise, it remains but a claim.

  • @OmegaCause

    So are you going to make the claim that matter always existed? Do you believe this? And if so, where did it come from? Why don't you humble yourself and admit that your cognitive capacity is very small, and that your statements are made in ignorance, and that what is really going on here is a refusal on your part to acknowledge and SUBMIT to God. "Men love darkness rather than light, because their deeds are evil" (John 3).

    You love darkness. That much is clear.

  • @peterpulpitpounder:"are you going to make the claim that matter always existed?"

    Matter itself.....Not necessarily, but something very elemental that started the process of matter forming.

    This is far more reasonable, than some super complex creator coming out of nowhere

  • @peterpulpitpounder "matter always existed?"

    Yes. According to the First Law of Thermodynamics, matter and energy are equivocal; neither can be 'created' (as proponents of intelligent design and creationism will suggest) or destroyed. Thus, the idea that matter has always existed is quite defensible with evidence. The theory has yet to be falsified, but that's not to say that it's impossible to falsify. If it weren't, it wouldn't be a theory.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "where did it come from?"

    It's yet to be known. So far what we believe to have caused this is two brane worlds colliding with one and another. However, there is nothing about introducing an uncaused designer into the equation that solves the enigma of why we are here, and why everything exists. The "god did it" answer is just an ad hoc way of attempting (and failing miserably) to resolve this quandary, by relying on a bad explanation then none at all.

  • Religion's position on gays is remarkably contradictory, to boot. Why would a supposedly all-powerful god allow any being to corrupt a person's primal desire? Please oh please enlighten us oh all-knowing one.

  • @AdoptReality Simple. It's their dissuasive excuse. They can't cope with the reality that homosexuality is prevalent both among humans and animals in nature, and they define it as a deadly sin yet bother not to question why a God who is so abject and opposed to it's practice would allow these species to be born, or even influenced by nature (whatever their beliefs are) to engage in homosexual tendencies.

  • @AdoptReality

    Actually, homosexuality is the child of human rebellion and suppression of divine revelation (see Romans 1). Man stepped out of the context of dependence on God, and within the context of selfish independence & pride fostered all kinds of evils, especially within the sexual realm. Sex is a gift from God to be enjoyed within the realm of a heterosexual marriage, but this gift has been perverted. Man is to blame, not God who made His will clear.

  • @peterpulpitpounder:" Sex is a gift from God"

    Quite the opposite, as sex is the tool nature uses to ensure that a species keeps going

  • @AtheistToothFairy And if it was a gift - women wouldn't have diamonds and 14 pairs of black shoes.

  • @DarwinsFriend:"And if it was a gift - women wouldn't have diamonds and 14 pairs of black shoes"

    Not to mention a giant closet full of clothes that only get wore ONCE ;)

  • @ClearingStoneProphet Handy to design a planet so perfectly that it is mostly covered with undrinkable water with a cooling cracking crust. Go figure, there are frequent earthquakes so that no one ever knows for sure which ones were punishments for gay sex. Mr Owuor is the guy to ask apparently after Harold Camping proved he isn't really chatting with God. He's a fraud. Mr. Owuor is the real deal.

  • @yankinCanada Mr. Owuor is the real deal.

    Well, of course!

  • @yankinCanada

    "...Mr Owuor is the guy to ask apparently after Harold Camping proved he isn't really chatting with God. He's a fraud. Mr. Owuor is the real deal..."

    THE VISION GIVEN TO PROPHET OWUOR ABOUT THE EARTH SHAKING DESTRUCTION COMING TO THE U.S.A. FROM THE EASTERN SEABOARD IS NOT GUARANTEED TO OCCUR IF THE PEOPLE REPENT OF THE SEXUAL WICKEDNESS AND THE SPIRITUAL BACKSLIDDEN CONDITION. DO WHAT YOU WILL. JESUS CHRIST SPOKE IN HIS HOLY WORD ABOUT THE DREADFUL WORLD SORROWS.

  • IF MY(JESUS CHRIST) PEOPLE, WHICH ARE CALLED BY MY NAME(JESUS CHRIST), SHALL HUMBLE THEMSELVES, AND PRAY, AND SEEK MY(JESUS CHRIST) FACE, AND TURN FROM THEIR WICKED WAYS; THEN WILL I(JESUS CHRIST) HEAR FROM HEAVEN, AND WILL FORGIVE THEIR SIN, AND WILL HEAL THEIR LAND.(2 Chronicles 7:14)

  • @ClearingStoneProphet Writing in all CAPS doesn't make your dogma more convincing or true. It only shows that you're too lazy to remember to use the "Shift" key when appropriate.

  • AND JESUS ANSWERED AND SAID UNTO THEM, TAKE HEED THAT NO MAN DECEIVE YOU. FOR MANY SHALL COME IN MY NAME, SAYING, I AM CHRIST; AND SHALL DECEIVE MANY. AND YE SHALL HEAR OF WARS AND RUMOURS OF WARS: SEE THAT YE BE NOT TROUBLED: FOR ALL THESE THINGS MUST COME TO PASS, BUT THE END IS NOT YET. FOR NATION SHALL RISE AGAINST NATION, AND KINGDOM AGAINST KINGDOM: AND THERE SHALL BE FAMINES, PESTILENCES, AND EARTHQUAKES, IN DIVERS PLACES. ALL THESE ARE THE BEGINNING OF SORROWS.(Matthew 24:4-8)

  • THE PROPHETIC VISION OF ANOTHER GREAT EARTHQUAKE ON THE EASTERN SEABOARD OF THE U.S.A. WAS PRONOUNCED BY GOD(JESUS CHRIST) TO PROPHET OWUOR IN AFRICA ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2011.

    BECAUSE OF THE OVERWHELMING SIN OF HOMOSEXUALITY, GAY MARRIAGE, EVIL, AND COMPROMISING MONEY GRUBBING CROWD PLEASING PASTORS ALL OVER AMERICA IN HER CHURCHES.

    UNLESS THERE IS A NATIONAL TURNBACK IN REPENTANCE TO THE LORD JESUS CHRIST THIS PROPHETIC VISION OF DISASTER SHALL STRIKE THE U.S.A. EAST COAST. BELIEVE IT OR NOT.

  • Said by a theist: "".It's gross. Two men in the same bed? Yuck!"

    A homosexual has no more control over their preference than you do over yours. Denying that fact is no different than denying any other well established fact of science. Sad, though, since it's the enlightenment of science that has furthered humanity so much.

  • @AdoptReality

    "A homosexual has no more control over their preference than you do over yours."

    Really? And who poisoned you with this line of thinking? If someone was nurtured in a particular vice or evil, does it make it right? Are you going to soften you stance against that vice, condone or accept it? Gay is gross, unnatural, against nature, and, most importantly, against God's original design and will.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "If someone was nurtured in a particular vice or evil, does it make it right?" No. However, it's clearly NOT 'evil'. It happens to be a sexual preference and should be none of your concern unless you're a homosexual.

    It's really that simple.

    "Gay is gross" ...don't do it, then.

    "unnatural, against nature"...Wrong again. It seems that many, MANY species have homosexual relationships. In fact, some birds form lifelong monogamous homosexual pair bonds.

  • @AlanIsHarmony and the male lion kills all the cubs in a pride of lionesses he has just won from a rival male. i guess you think it would be ok for someone to kill the his stepchild. using the animal kingdom to get your moral standards is not the best place to get them.

  • @40something100 No. But he said it's unnatural and clearly it's not. Nor does it affect him or me. So what people do in the privacy of theor own homes is of no consequence.

    Now, have I suggested anywhere that the animal kingdom is the place from which to get morals? You do realise that we didn't get our morals from the Bible, don't you?

  • @AlanIsHarmony but their activities have affected you and i, are you going to deny that it is through the hopmosexual community that the aids epidemic spread not that the disease was spawned by them but that it was spread by them. aids was almost exclusively a homosexual disease until it spread into the drug community and then into the hetrosexual world, which affects us all let alone the money we spend fighting the disease.how can you say it doesn't affect you or me.

  • @40something100 No, their activities don't affect me. I'm not a homosexual, so I run no risk of contracting AIDS. There are a number of diseases that spread by body fluids. However, it's utterly immoral to suggest that something they do, that brings them pleasure and is done with a consenting adult should be abstained from because it's in some way "immoral". That's the point and trying to derail the discussion by bringing in the cost of treatment shows your contemptible view.

  • @AlanIsHarmony so it's immoral to suggest that i should deem an activity inappropriate just because it brings pleasure to consenting adults, and who are you to tell me what is or isn't immoral? do you get to decide morality, no is it a popularity contest whereby morals are determined by consent of society? no.

  • @40something100 But the fact is that society has always and will always define morality. Your lack of morality revolves around the fact that you have an idea that you should be allowed to dictate who should have sex with whom.

    It's morally bankrupt.

  • @AlanIsHarmony if society defines morality then in effect there is no morality, only what is acceptale for now, it is constantly changing, and is being that is moraly bankrupt. i don't define morals i follow a predescribed set of values which is never changing, and not subject to societies views.

  • @40something100 "if society defines morality then in effect there is no morality". Precisely. As it always has been, but we design laws to produce the kind of society we desire. Always have.

    "i follow a predescribed set of values ". Specifically, you follow a set of values that were made up by bronze age scribes, who were trying to instruct their own people on where their own morality originated. That alone should tell you how preposterous a concept it is.

  • @40something100 "it is constantly changing, and is being that is moraly bankrupt."

    How so? Codes of ethics have *always* been changing and shifting. Not everything across cultures or even in the same neighborhood will be perceived in the same way. That's why even as of today laws are arbitrated. That's why slavery is no longer considered morally acceptable in most societies. Ethical dilemmas are never black-and-white and are very subjective, depending on an individual's perception of an issue.

  • Morals are a contract & agreement between 2 or more people about how to least trample on the others needs. Morals are a social construction. Societies make morals in order to maintain themselves. They COME from our shared physicality & facts about our nature like being vulnerable to physical harm either through direct attack to our body or to an attack to our peripheral support mechanisms (family property,etc) & what we can reasonably expect as compromise to avoid such harm.

  • @40something100 Incidentally, due to the suspected origins of the disease, it was initially spread by heterosexuals. So we'd still need to spend money to fight the disease.

    Homosexuals have the same options as everyone else, which is to use protection.

  • @40something100 Nice try at putting words in my mouth, though.

  • @AlanIsHarmony

    It's against nature. You are suppressing the truth. A nut and bolt go together, not two bolts, if you get my drift. It's plain to see that your mind is so stained with filth, and your heart so encrusted with perversion, that you love what is evil and hate what is good. The Bible talks about people like you, who put light for darkness and darkness for light. I'd work on getting your head realigned, because it is seriously disjointed.

  • @peterpulpitpounder ...You are suppressing the truth...

    Okay - lets roll out the hit parade on suppressing the truth: Galileo under house arrest for 14 years, Salem "witches" being hung for making soap, and your brother in the faith Rev. Phelps mocking dead soldiers?

    Truth is - would you - if you had the power - silence all paleontologists and subscribers (like me) to the theory of evolution and imprison those of differing sexual values?

    Come on - fess up. The truth shall set you free.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "It's against nature". No it's not. I've explained quite clearly why you're wrong and just ignoring the explanation won't change the fact of the matter.

    Homosexuality is widespread in the animal kingdom. Humans are animals. Get over it.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "The Bible talks about people like you...". But what the Bible says has no more relevance to me than does the Qur'an, nor the Baghavad Gita.

    in short, the authors of the bible had no fucking clue, but were of their time. It is a book written for JEWS of the TIME. Not for non-Jews 3,000 years later.

  • @peterpulpitpounder

    You refuse to believe that one's attraction to the same sex is inherent is some people, solely because you think your god wouldn't make someone in a determinant manner to be attracted to the same sex, so it doesn't fit your twisted world view.

    Deny it all you wish, but nature itself shows that you're dead wrong, but don't look outside your god-bubble, because reality is SCARY SHIT huh?

  • @peterpulpitpounder

    "And who poisoned you with this line of thinking?"

    Science and sound research. Oh yeah, you believe religious text over science.

    Forget the science, do you REALLY think that someone would CHOOSE being different in that way? How do you explain the majority of gays not even admitting it?

    This repressive attitude is why such pompous, arrogant, science-denying effort must be fought for free civilization to ever advance beyond its barbaric roots.

  • @AdoptReality

    So, if someone is born with a bent to steal, or with a bent toward incest, or with a bent toward child molestation, than these acts are okay? What is someone says, "I was born this way, and you are blaming me for desires that are part of my essence and nature." I mean, how are you going to answer this? Guess what? You don't have a good answer, and it's because atheism has no moral foundation. You are forced to admit that anything goes in this life.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "if someone is born with a bent to steal, or with a bent toward incest, or with a bent toward child molestation, than these acts are okay". No. Because we, as a society, define what we want of a society and deem these things unlawful.

    The things you mention are a direct infringement on the rights of other individuals, so you're not comparing like with like.

    "...anything goes in this life". It could do, but as a society, we don't let "anything go".

  • @peterpulpitpounder ...and, most importantly, against God's original design and will...

    Like foreskin? Like the human appendix? Vestigial human ear muscles? (boy - that was a great creation, oh Lord!)

    In-as-much as humans designed God and that image only held power though obedience and slavery to human ideals - the whole subject smells like a backed up and over flowing cesspool.

    Again - fuck all religion and those that enforce it.

  • @MrTubetown  Communism practiced anti-theism as a practical matter of it's survival. We often use the word atheism when we are more accurate to say ant-theism. Lack of belief in the claims of theists is not a philosophy that informs communism. Communism is an artificial social construct that requires "buy in" and if not, subservience and obedience.

  • @AdoptReality: Re: "I inviged one of your supposedly powerful spirits to do SOMETHING...."

    Dearie, you have not been endowed with powers to summon or dismiss anyone or anything in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Simon the sorcerer also nursed such lofty ideals and was denied. He was rebuked and unlike you, repented. You are an blaspheming apostate. You should've stayed in Church.

  • @grannyvonng

    Dearie, neither have you.

    Invoking your magical nonsense then saying it only works through special people is no different than admitting that it doesn't exist at all.

    So thanks for fessing up what we know all along, your religious nonsense is just as dismissible as that of the scientologists, the witches, the muslims, and on and one.

    Fantasy makes a great movie, but it makes you just look plain stupid. Sorry dear.

  • @AdoptReality: "..thanks for fessing up.."

    Lionel, who said spiritual gifts don't work?Not I, for sure! Spiritual gifts cannot be sought or grasped; they are divinely bestowed and not to magnify the individual possessing the gift but to enhance the ministry - for the edification of the Church.You are devil's advocate and as such, not endowed with any of the gifts of the Holy Spirit bestowed upon the Church of Jesus Christ.You have forsaken and abused the Church. Ungrateful!

  • @grannyvonng "You have forsaken and abused the Church".

    Well, given the amount of abuse that's come from some churches, it's about time they got some payback.

  • @grannyvonng "; they are divinely bestowed..."

    Ah yes. The "gift" of being absent in the face of a killer epidemic resulting in millions of deaths, and even a greater number of families torn. Let's give thanks to God for staying true to his asinine and pointless "plan" of redemption.

  • @grannyvonng "You are devil's advocate..."

    How can that be, when neither he nor I believe in the devil?

    "not endowed with any of the gifts of the Holy Spirit..."

    What "gifts"? The gift of complete obfuscation between the thousands of Christian groups who can't seem to come to an agreement on which group holds the superior rendering of God's one, unalterable and amenable word?

  • @grannyvonng ...Spiritual gifts cannot be sought or grasped...

    Sounds like the definition of a rotten crouched island woman's fart.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "it is impossible for God to sin"

    BUT..... even though it is supposedly impossible for Yahweh to sin he creates beings that can sin and then blames them when they do.

  • @Iconoclast444

    Yes, and He created you, giving you the liberty to spout of mockery and evil without "immediate" consequences. So your point is well taken, unto your own favor. Now I suggest you repent BEFORE facing the same end as those who in history mocked their Creator.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "He created you, giving you the liberty to spout of mockery and evil without "immediate" consequences."

    I'll ask you the same question that I asked granny. Will there be the "free will" to sin in heaven or will you be as granny said, "God's robot"?

  • @grannyvonng "you seem unable to assimilate the concept of "free choice". God could have made us automatons...."

    So there will there be redeemed people "sinning" and getting thrown out of in your supposed future heaven? Or will they be as you say.....robots.

  • @grannyvonng Please discard the extra "there" grannyhag.

  • @Iconoclast444

    Nope. Sin entered the world via Adam's transgression. His failed headship brought these detriment of the sin nature upon his posterity. We see many examples of this today, especially in the physical realm. A father smokes around his children, and they get asthma, or even cancer. He swears and displays lack of self-control, and his children grow up adopting the same. Our action have consequences. Ever thought about this? You should.

  • @peterpulpitpounder ...His failed headship brought these detriment of the sin nature upon his posterity...

    head·ship (hdshp) n.

    1. The position or office of a head or leader; primacy or command.

    2. Chiefly British The position of a headmaster or headmistress.

    Gee - that's quite a load to put on the first human - ever. Again, the O/T Lord was the ultimate prick.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "His failed headship brought these detriment of the sin nature upon his posterity."

    Fuck a duck! I've seen some shit typed on this site, but that fucker takes the biscuit.

  • @peterpulpitpounder "Our action have consequences. Ever thought about this?"

    I don't drink, smoke, use drugs, or habitual use "profanities" (only on youtube at an occasional so-called Christian). I only have a couple of traffic tickets from 40 years of driving, I've never cheated on my wife in 35 years of marriage, not because of your god/bible but because of thinking about consequences. BUT I guess will go to hell because I don't believe the bible's outrageous story eh?

  • @Iconoclast444

    Self-righteousness will not take you to heaven.

  • @grannyvonng "Self righteousness will not take you to heaven."

    Silly woman, even if your heaven did exist I wouldn't want to go there.

  • @peterpulpitpounder how does an asshole 6000 years ago eating a fruit make it so that all animals have to die or eat eachother or suffer disease etc. Bullshit.

    Evolution explains death disease and deformity perfectly well with no need to say children deserve to die because of some stupid curse god put on them because of their great^32 grandfather.

  • @peterpulpitpounder ".It's gross. Two men in the same bed? Yuck!"

    You only feel that way because you're heterosexual. I bet you wouldn't be as disgusted with two women.

  • @Iconoclast444

    My judgement is not based on human reason or fleshly impulses, but upon the expressed standard of God. You sound just like the warped and ungodly construction workers I used to work with years ago, who perverted and warped everything. Their minds were clouded. To them nothing was pure. They made a dirty joke out of everything. Yup, they were atheists too, real outstanding citizens!

  • @peterpulpitpounder "My judgement is not based on human reason or fleshly impulses"

    Then why did you say "yuck"?

    You can't tell me you don't have desires Peter.... If you're a heterosexual male you will naturally on occasion "check out" or think about various attractive females. Even though the Jesus character forbid you not to lust after another person "in you heart" you still do because you can't help it.

  • @Iconoclast444

    God says, "Yuck," and yuck it is.

  • @peterpulpitpounder God says "Yuck and yuck it is."

    Don't lie peter, it was your idea.

  • @peterpulpitpounder

    Even if it is gross or "yuck", any person with an ounce of decency, could not come up with a compelling justification, why such behavior should earn the people engaging in it, a societally codified death penalty. Could anyone, outside of the context of a religion, feel that this is a just consequence?

  • @Iconoclast444

    Why won't ppp be disgusted about two women performing the abominables? When we speak of homosexuality it's in reference to this unnatural practice by both genders.

    You mentioned earlier that after 35 years of marriage you've never "looked" at another woman. That's odd - unless you're blind in both eyes or gay. How many men have you ogled lecherously? Iconoclast - the Gay Advocate.

  • @grannyvonng "You mentioned earlier that after 35 years of marriage you've never "looked" at another woman."

    Uh no, granny, I didn't say that.

  • @Iconoclast444

    Whether "cheated" or "looked" - whatever! My comment stands the same.

  • @grannyvonng I guess you've never ogled another man the whole time you were married huh? Regardless of what Matthew 5:27 -28 says, there's still a lot of difference between checking out, looking at another woman/man and actually going all the way,

  • @grannyvonng "Why won't ppp be disgusted about two women performing the abominables?"

    You're reading comprehension sucks. I meant heterosexual men, not people in general.

    "How many men have you ogled lecherously?" None, I'm 100% hetero.

  • @Iconoclast444: Re: "Your reading comprehension sucks.I meant heterosexual men, not people in general"

    HERE'S WHAT YOU WROTE: "You only feel that way because you're heterosexual. I bet you wouldn't be as disgusted with two women."

    The above comment is ambiguous. Elucidate by adding a little more depth to your thoughts.

  • @grannyvonng Correction: "Your" not "you're".

  • @AtheistToothFairy Sure, there is one part of Satan that even the most hardcore Atheist can SEE. That is EVIL. The Evil that drives Murders to Kill, Destroy. The Evil in Child-Molesters and Killers. This TANGIBLE EVIL WITNESS by many is driven by Satan. Also, if you want more... "Accidental" tragic Death is also caused by Him. -Hosea 4:6 That knowledge is How to prologue your natural life to its fullest by Resiting the Devil/Evil Forces.

  • @SpiritWorldBlog none of that is as evil as torturing someone forever. 

  • @ExtantFrodo2 That torture is from Satan's Demons who are led by Satan. In the end Satan will be cast to Hell, right now he rules the world, this is because he took the authority frm Adam - Those who reject GOD are doing the very thing Satan did, and those who Do Evil are doing the everything Satan does. This world's Justice System punishes only