A17.13 Solving Systems of Linear Inequalities

[mrshackleferd]

now obviously you are both wrong, (-2,0) back into the inequality: -3x-y>6, you get 6>6, which is incorrect, but if you think that because you are something is incorrect you are correct, you are very sadly wrong my good sirs, it is only in the quite loneliness of meditation that you can differentiate right from wrong, and even then, you still do not have the right do debunk another man to such a level

[Hp5461]

my teacher explains it so fast that i can't catch up. i can't believe i have to learn from here. nicee videos it helps me alot

[djbuckethat]

If it's any consolation...you're correct. I'm very good at math and this is a very good explanation.

[fuckyoupiceofsheet64]

thanks u helped me so much

[anje51496]

thank you.

ur video is very helpful.

i now understand the whole thing.

our teacher hasn't discuss this.yet she gave us assignment about that.bcoz of ur video.i now know how to do it!THANK YOU!im really grateful!

[johnnymccony]

thank u so much!

[shamushi]

Really Helpful,,,Thanks so much!

[27dimensions]

No this isn't right, you made a mistake. Take a look at the beginning of the film, where it has the point (-2,0) If you plug

(-2,0) back into the inequality: -3x-y>6, you get 6>6, which is incorrect. Just goes to show you you can't listen to everything you see online since most of it's posted by neubs and the people who are actually good at math like me don't have the time to make movies all day.

[ttor68]

The video is correct. The problem asks to graph the linear inequality. In order to do this you have to graph the line first. That is what is happening when the point (-2,0) is being found. The fact that the line is dotted acknowledges that 6>6 is not true. So this solution is correct.

[27dimensions]

Thank you for making the correction in your video. now it is correct.

[yt257]

background of the person who took time to put out this excellent video --- run away from math..if you can-- you can't understand anything... why do you say video is correct now whne no change was made to the original?

[yt257]

before you accuse someone, look yourself in the mirror. you not only understand match.. you can't hear and see properly. the video is correct and the math world would be better if you did not teach math or make a video... don't jump to conclusion without knowing the background of the person who took time to put out this excellent video --- run away from math..if you can-- you can't understand anything... why do you say video is correct now whne no change was made to the original?

[AzureMina]

@27dimensions lol neub?

i think you mean noob, noob xD

[wahobia1993]

@27dimensions quit being a smart ass, asshole.U ass

[guru911]

awesome. Thanks

[friedcube]

oh thank u

u scratched out the "y" to find "x" rite?

[ericcbishopp321]

that helped soooo much!

thanks :]

[glieswayz]

Thanks alot..

that was helpful...

keep it up