So, this basically destroys your own argument in another video of yours where you said "tea-partiers are not homophobic" Perhaps some aren't, but you sir, you take the cake. Pray a shroud of protection and carry pepper spray? What the fuck is wrong with you?
@TimeWillShadow A phobia is an irrational fear of something. That is not what Molotov exhibits. He displays a very conscious, deliberate hatred of the homosexual lifestyle, for logical reasons stemming from his religious beliefs. Neither fear nor irrationality is involved.
@Halo4Lyf You're correct with the definition of phobia but you assume that homophobia is simply a phobia of homosexuals and that is where you are wrong. In fact the word has evolved to mean not just fear but also antipathy and hatred towards homosexuals. Words have meanings, you should do some research on this. Also, I am unsure that the bible gives anybody the ability to reasonably infer logical reasons for the hatred of any group of people. It doesn't seem very Christ-like to me.
@TimeWillShadow How very Orwellian of you. We don't hate them. We hate what they do, how they live. If we hated them, why would we be trying to secure for them eternal life?
@Halo4Lyf You're using that word, Orwellian. I don't think it means what you think it means.
Regardless, I'm sick of arguing on this rather hateful guy's youtube video. You can privately message me if you really want to continue our friendly banter.
@reasonvsuropinion You guys are hilarious. It's not my opinion that has changed the word, it's what the word itself is defined as. Here, copied word for word from merriam-webster: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals. Note that not just irrational fear is what this word denotes.
I got a shirt too.It says Morons are so Stupid. What do you mean by Stupid? I don't know
it's
your
word.
Stupid originally meant being in a stupor due to the influence of a substance or condition. But far right nimrods hated that so they changed it to better describe far right nimrods.
Also, FOR THE RECORD, homosexuals didn't start using the term gay to mean homosexual, heterosexuals did. They didn't apply it to themselves any more than African Americans applied the N-Bomb to themselves.
hey in case you were wondering being homosexual isn't a choice let me put it this way, if you had a choice betwen liking girls and not being made fun of for it or liking men and being treated like shit for it let me know what you choose it is how they are born dumbass
@CBOvechkin8 Tell the Christians in muslium run countriesor in china they were the "born" that way..No it is a choice..unlike hair ,skin or eye color Just as Christians chose to be in life threatening danger for their beliefs..so go the homosexuals
This video is little more than a bigoted, hateful, vile piece of revolting trash made by some fat douchebag with ugly tattoos who's never been to a pride parade or festival in his life. If he has, he'd know that 99% of the people there are dressed in ugly tank tops, cargo shorts, and flip flops. Christ, I WISH more the of men wore dresses and makeup, it'd make the whole event a hell of a lot more interesting to everyone!
How in god's name can someone be so fixated on who someone else has sex with? I mean having a regressive and terrible political opinion is one thing but this man is totally obsessed with gay people.
Wow you put a lot of effort into hating a group of people who have never done anything to you. Jesus must be so proud of his little chinless, pube beard freak, making all these videos advocating hate and armed revolution.
@RevSpitz11 Coming from the guy the SPLC wrote this about;
He rails against "filthy faggots" and "lesbos." Islam is "Satanic," Arabs are "Rag-Heads," and Muslims "should not be allowed to live in the United States." New York City is a "sex perverted cesspool" that richly deserved Sept. 11.
@DublinFiller Haha, hey at least you can say you ran into the Reverend Donald. Usually idiots you meet on the internet aren't so insufferable that they have a SPLC and Wikipedia entry.
Looks like I'm the 1000th comment, so I'll just take this opportunity to say: I too wish those nasty gays would stop practicing infidelity and be more like our politicians... Newt Gingrich or John Edwards, say.
The gay culture has not earned one bit of respect. Like spoiled children, they have demanded it, despite overwhelming proof of their own self-destructive tendencies. That is exactly why they get ZERO respect. The politicians and the media are spineless, but most people see right through the charade.
In regards to pride parades: while those who come to these parades dressed like drag queens are doing the cause of equality a disservice, the whole "children shouldn't be there" is a load of bullshit. Nobody in those parades wears clothes more revealing than what people wear when they go to a swim, yet I can't find one conservatives who says children shouldn't be allowed to go to the beach. I wouldn't be surprised though if I learned that you force you wife to wear a "burqini".
Nobody's entitled to respect and nobody expects the government to act otherwise. If you want to remain a homophobic bigot it's your right, and don't expect any person whose mind inhibits the 21st century to respect you.
Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen detail a three-stage plan to homosexualize America in their book, After the Ball. They describe the plan to further the gay agenda and homosexualize America as a threefold plan, “desensitize, jam, and convert.”
Here’s a quote from the father of gay activism: “We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools…. in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms…wherever men are men together. Your sons will become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us” [Michael Swift, Gay Community News, 15 February 1987]. How about your man Harry Hay?
Here’s a quote from the father of gay activism: “We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools…. in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms…wherever men are men together. Your sons will become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us” [Michael Swift, Gay Community News, 15 February 1987]. How about your man Harry Hay?
Not to sure I completely agree with you Sebizzar but to be honest these fascists would happily lock a guy up for being gay and stop abortions. Which in turn puts more kids up for adoption. Which gives gay families children. Hmm, republicans accidentally got something right...sort of.
@HobbsO Actually homosexuals are the fascists, preferring to advance their radical militant agendas through the courts against the plainly stated will of the people.
As they couldn't get "gay marriage" at the ballot box they usurped the will of the people through activist courts, overturning the rights and will of the people as expressed in prop 8 and prop 22 which passed by wide margins.
@penguinistas That's not fascism. Fascism is a radical authoritarian nationalist political ideology. It advocates the creation of a totalitarian single-party state that seeks the mass mobilization of a nation through discipline, indoctrination, physical education, and family policy (such as eugenics). You on the other hand described a loophole.
@HobbsO Well that's the wikipedia definition. In general, I would have described fascism as the merger of state and corporate powers under a dictator.
@penguinistas In other words it's right wing. Anyway, don't you find it a bit unfair to control people's lives. If you really think we should control people who were born differently AND you believe God created all of us (yer I know, it's stupid but bear with me) and God is all knowing, powerful et cetera. therefore his creations are beyond are understanding then how can we claim to know that controlling God's creation is a good thing. Surely it's against God.
@HobbsO Ahhh... I see the problem... you've had a public education. Teachers unions are notoriously left wing and are loath to admit the sins of the left.
Fascists are left wing (not right wing). You have to look at what fascists actually did not what liberal apologists trying to disavow fascism say.
Nazi is short for National SOCIALIST. Hitler hated Christians, was in favor of abortion, euthanasia, eugenics, gun control and loved big government. Hitler was clearly left wing.
@penguinistas No stupid, he wasn't. Hitler only manipulated Christmas to remove the Jewish born Christ to stop an uprising of Jews. Euthanasia was to eradicate the handicapped from his perfect race, Hitler was only pro-abortion because he had a low respect for the human life and just wanted to keep his populous happy enough so they roll over and play dead, big government so he could control people.
@HobbsO You're trying to draw a distinction between left wing policies and Hitler's, even suggesting left wing abortion and euthanasia are better than his.
You said “manipulated Christmas to remove the Jewish born Christ to stop an uprising of Jews”. That's pure fiction. Hitler confiscated guns to prevent Jewish uprisings.
Hitler showed his love for Christianity by imprisoning 100's of priests on invented charges and turning churches into indoctrination centers.
@penguinistas He started left wing but only to manipulate the people into putting him in power during a depression. Anyone who gets into power then tears out the unions that put him there is right wing. In the depression not accepting abortion is stupidity. He needed to save cash and prepare for war. Like I said, he was right wing but not HUGELY right wing, just a bit.
@HobbsO You're desperate and you're lying, making up stories to cover for your lack of evidence. There is no way you can establish anything close to what you've claimed.
Hitler, National SOCIALIST, abortion, gun control, eugenics, euthanasia, big government micromanaging things and destruction of individual rights.
Hitler policies were always left wing and he never ever moved to the right.
It's impossible to have intelligent debate if you are going to lie.
@penguinistas I'm not lying. Hitler DID destroy the unions, Hitler DID prepare for war and Hitler was a hateful, racist right wing extremist. Right wing extremist doesn't mean he was hugely left or right wing. It means he was extremely fascist. Your picking and choosing data to say he was ONLY left wing but that's a total lie. Even your big government thing is wrong because Hitler's big government was about control while socialist big government is about equal opportunity.
@HobbsO Your public school education is a real handicap.
Hitler replaced existing unions with Nazi unions (the DAF).
"I am convinced that we cannot possibly dispense with the trades unions. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions in the economic life of the nation"
Hitler in Mein Kampf
AND
Liberal lefties got American troops involved in most of our wars. (D) Woodrow Wilson / WWi, (D) FDR / WWII, (D) Harry Truman / Korea, (D) JFK / Vietnam, (D) Obama / Libya.
@penguinistas Wiki explains it better than me. Nazism, the common short form name of National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus) was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and Nazi Germany. It is a unique variety of fascism that incorporates biological racism and anti-Semitism.
Nazism was founded out of elements of the far-right racist völkisch German nationalist movement and the violent anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary culture that fought against the uprisings of
@HobbsO I would never trust wikipedia for anything remotely political or controversial. It's too easily manipulated by people with agendas and wikipedia has some insane rules which allow bold faced lies to be published so long as they are printed in a well respected source.
the brutal and violent history of African slave trade with Islamic nations is routinely scrubbed from it's pages for such reasons.
@penguinistas So in other words your taking the information that you can see for yourself is true and ignoring it because it proves you wrong. So we're just ignoring Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan. There exempt though aren't they. Bush STARTS 3 wars and these guys JOIN wars to HELP people and suddenly they're the bad guys. However Nixon almost puts the entire Earth into a nuclear wasteland for trying to make his MISSILE bigger than the other guys and he's just dandy???
@HobbsO What truth? Who's truth? Wikipedia is extremely flawed and is notoriously prone to groups rewriting history to suit their ideologies
As Wikipedia authors remain nameless and faceless, it allows them to print lies or remove inconvenient truth with impunity
For example, the long and brutal history of Islamic nations, seizing Africa slaves was at one time was included in wikipedia but was later removed by an Islamic apologist
war mongering left wingers started MOST of the wars
@penguinistas The whole USA is full of war mongers. The fact the right wings like to give there people guns to encourage war just proves my point. Yes we're heard about your African slaves already. It's very hard to keep a strongly debated argument on wiki BUT any argument put forward has to have valid sources of which plenty justify the statement that Hitler tricked his people into helping him kill Jews, Marxists (Marxism is left wing btw, Hitler hated it) and socialist Russia.
@HobbsO Regarding sources of information. I prefer to know who wrote the info as it helps expose any biases.
The questions of bias surrounding the gay activist who found the "gay gene" were found to be fully justified after other researchers were not able to reproduce his findings.
Guns discourage violence. The left wing Nazi's confiscated guns in the name of public safety before marching the Jews off to the gas chambers. The Jews in the Warsaw ghetto survived till their ammo ran out.
@penguinistas So where does your info come from. Him ^ or Fox News?
The gay gene doesn't exist in the way we thought it did but people are still born gay.
Guns encourage stupidity and violence. I could name many reasons guns are bad. The main one being people are bad. People's homes are invaded by armed assailants all the time in the US because guns are legal. Jews were labelled and segregated and NOT at war when they were singled out. guns wouldn't have helped anyone there.
@HobbsO To assume that all people are bad is paranoia.
To disarm honest citizens of the best way to defend themselves, and their families from the real bad guys is elitist arrogance and hypocrisy.
Your ignorance of history is astounding. The Jews in the Warsaw ghetto of Poland held off the Nazi's till their ammo ran out. Finish militias held off the Russian Army in WWII.
If guns encourage violence then do matches encourage arson?
@penguinistas Hey lets look at Norway they LOVE guns right now. What with that Christian extremist Anders Behring Breivik killing 77 people and wounding 151 with a rifle, a pistol and a car bomb. Norway thought this was such a great step they made guns free with any kids meal at McDonald's...wait no...they tightened there gun laws. Funny that.
@HobbsO So you're saying a country should disarm it's citizens based upon the actions of one man, in the name of safety. Would you then band smoking and alcohol too in the name of safety?
Let's think like adults. Hitler: 12 million dead, Stalin: 20 million, Mao Zedong: 50+ million, Pol Pot: 2+ million (there are many, many more).
Each tyrant imposed gun control in the name of disarming criminals but then committed mass murder.
And, millions of people have PREVENTED crime with guns.
@HobbsO More liberal spin. If a priest molests a choir boy, Liberals blame Christianity or the Catholics and will ignore the fact that the priest was a homosexual.
While we're looking at other countries, lets look at the Swiss. Every home has automatic weapons (part of their mandatory militias) and their rate of gun crime is about zero.
Breivik wrote in his manifesto that he is not religious, has doubts about God's existence, and does not pray (some Christian).
@penguinistas It's more to do with spending time in the military than owning a gun. Lets look at the USA. Guns are like sweets there and the ACCIDENTAL shooting rate is more than enough to make an argument to why guns are bad. You then give those guns to the small number of "bad guys" and all hell breaks loose. He was a fundamentalist dumb ass. wrote about faith and fear of Islam. Swiss guns in homes only have 1 clip and are inspected regularly to see if the container they are in
@HobbsO What kind of moron are you? Swiss children carry rifles slung over their backs while riding their bicycles down the street, so where's your source for this nonsense about the Swiss only having 1 clip"? For a reserve soldier,1 clip is a minimum requirement not a maximum allowable.
If gun laws could disarmed criminals then drug laws should have already rid the US of drugs too, but they haven't. Stupid liberal guns laws only disarm "LAW ABIDING" citizens not "LAWLESS" criminals.
@penguinistas Oh so you just "forgot" the part where I said (in essence) "military training causes less crime". Also bought guns have to be taken in public without ammunition in the magazine, the weapon has to be taken directly to the desired use (e.g. shooting range), and to carry a Swiss gun in public requires a permit. UK gun crime rate is 0.07 per 100,000, Switzerland is 0.56 and the USA is 2.97. Oh and finally not if your police weren't utterly useless.
@penguinistas has been opened. Little bit different. I agree it works but the US laws on guns are just stupid. I never said all people are bad but to assume no people are bad is ignorance. Smoking in public should be outlawed as it endangers others around you. Alcohol on the other hand is purely self destructive so go wild. That uprising caused the deaths of 254,000–300,000 Jews that could have been saved later in the war. People who prevent crime with guns are preventing gun crime
@HobbsO Your stupidity about the Jews of the Warsaw ghetto would be laughable if they were not so evil.
To suggest that the Jews who resisted being dragged to a Nazi death camp that it "caused the deaths" is a profane lie and spits upon the honor of those who fought to save their families from the death camps that were the horrific end of12 million people WHO DID NOT RESIST.
@penguinistas Actually the people resisted so the Nazis accelerated the process to kill them in a 2 month stint to set an example. They killed 17 German soldiers and sped the demise of 254,000–300,000 Jews.
@penguinistas communist revolutionaries in post WWI Germany. The ideology was developed first by Anton Drexler and then Adolf Hitler as a means to draw workers away from communism and into völkisch nationalism. Nazi political strategy focused on anti-big business, anti-bourgeois, and anti-capitalist rhetoric, though such aspects were later downplayed in the 1930s to gain the support from industrial owners for the Nazis; focus was shifted to anti-Semitic and anti-Marxist themes.
@HobbsO racism is a left wing thing as it gives them a scapegoat to hate. For example...
The leftist democrat party was home for the KKK and gave birth to the Jim Crow laws. (D) lester maddox, (D) Bull Connor and (D) George Wallace fought for segregation and turned hoses on peaceful protesting blacks.
The republican party which created the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments was formed in 1854 as an abolitionist party. Lincoln, Fredric Douglas, MKL were right wing Republicans.
@penguinistas don't get me wrong. Hitler's policies were actually very central all in all. Hit policies were more extremist UP on the government scale. However he was in fact a TEENY bit right wing.
@HobbsO Hitler (head of the National Socialists) and liberal Democrats (left wing) share the same views on big government, gun control, abortion, euthanasia, eugenics, confiscatory taxation, oppressive regulations, and the same hatred of the Jews.
That's the bulk of the political issues, and there's not much left. So how was Hitler "right wing"?
BTW, Lincoln, Frederick Douglass and MLK were right wing (republican). The KKK and Jim Crow on the other hand was left wing (democrat).
@penguinistas Hitler believed in social discrimination (right wing) while MLK by today’s standards, definitely a Democrat. He believed in social justice. King has become a national icon in the history of modern American liberalism. The right-wing today does not. Hitler also stopped unions and any kind of secret club or society (right wing). The KKK WAS left but is now right. You're comparing sides from 30-40 years ago to now. Things change. By MODERN standards Hitler was a righty
@penguinistas Lincoln was in agreement with the Democrats to fight a war with the South. The war was in no way about left and right wing. It was about industrialisation and one half of the country controlling the other. A few other things as well but you get the point. You can't take a view point and justify it by saying other people have the same view point therefore they are the same. Also Nick Griffin; SUPER right wing racist who hangs out with the KKK and white supremacist.
@penguinistas FINALLY don't let any ignoramus try to tell you that the Nazis must have been left-wing because they had the word "Socialist" in their party name. It was a misnomer. They were trying to coopt the term and get workign-man support, and it would only work with idiots. The Nazis were not in the least socialistic. They WERE, however, far right wing. Their anti-intellectual pandering to the alleged superior traditional values of the Volk is evidence enough.
@Sebizzar A "phobia" is an unreasonable fear of something. So called "homophobia" would be an unreasonable fear of homosexuals. Pointing out that homosexuality is a sin is not an unreasonable fear, and therefore not "homophobic".
Rather I find that homosexuals are very phobic of free speech which does not bow the knee to the myths and sacred cows of homosexuality.
@penguinistas Blah blah, all you homophobes are the same, always trying to justify a reason to not be called a homophobe. You do have an unreasonable fear, you're just using your religion as a cover up. Gay people aren't "phobic" of free speech, we are however going to stand up against hate speech & clearly stupid speech.
@Sebizzar I find that homosexuals (or perhaps liberals in general) don't debate very well and will lie and slander to defend their causes and fetishes. I really don't care if you think I'm homophobic or not, it's still a sin.
You said "using your religion as a cover up". I'll assume that you are actually smart enough to realize that the Jewish law, the Bible, and Islam plainly state that homosexuality is a serious sin.
@penguinistas So you're turning this into a political thing now? And yeah, those are religions as well, what's your point? I don't care if you think it's a "sin" or not, the fact is that homosexuality is natural & okay, people are just slowly realizing it. So once again, using religion as an excuse to be homophobic. God never even said anything homophobic, people did.
There's plenty of verses in the bible to prove you wrong. 1 Cor 7:2, Rom 1:26-27, and there's plenty more. You can justify homosexuality out of your (or some other man's) own morality, but that's not what God thinks.. it's an abomination to Him, and He says so in His word.
Those are verses from the bible, which are the word of God, which claims to be God-inspired. God hates it, He's declared it in His word over and over again. Check Leviticus 18:22, that's coming straight from His mouth. No middlemen, scribes or authors involved. "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, it is an abomination".
@DraughtOfPeace Nope, once again people wrote that book not God. And oh, he "hates" it, but i thought God doesn't hate? See, you just prove more that God may not be real when you make all these hypocritical statements. Besides, why exactly would he hate people loving each other? I'm sure spewing hatred, prejudice, beating people up, etc. is preferred in religion huh?
If you don't believe God even exists, it's kinda hard to argue with you on this topic. The bible claims to be the word of God, people were inspired to write it, but He's the mastermind author. If you don't believe that, you don't believe the bible; as simple as that. And you don't get to define that God 'doesn't hate' or what he does do. God hates several things, as is written in the bible. The God of the bible is very different from the god you seem to have an opinion of.
Seriously though, you should read the bible before arguing about it. Otherwise, I'd just be wasting my time with an ignoramus who's arguing by pulling stuff out of his ass. You don't get to choose what God does or doesn't do, He's already revealed His character in the bible. He CAN set the rules for how people 'love' each other because he created said people in the first place. Read up before you argue further, I don't want to wrestle with another self-contrived God idea of yours
The God I believe is Jesus Christ, your creator and judge. Call him what you may while there's still time; because pretty soon, your knee will bow, and your tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.
@penguinistas Haha oh poor little you, so naive. It's very natural, it occurs not only in humans but in animals. And just because it doesn't involve reproduction doesn't mean it can't be natural. And gay people CAN have kids if they want. I never said anything about a "gay gene", but heterosexuals have homosexual children, want to explain that? And Leviticus blah blah, the word "homosexuality" did not even exist at that time so once again you're giving invalid excuses.
@Sebizzar You can pretend that homosexuality is natural if you want to but your self inflicted delusion is not binding upon others.
No, homosexuals pairs can not have children (you need one of each for that just as God designed it).
And regarding Leviticus and homosexuality, you really do have your head in the sand. Where did you think they got the word "Sodomy"? The destruction of Sodom in Genesis 19 happened at least 500 years before Leviticus was even written.
@penguinistas You can pretend it's unnatural all you want, your delusion isn't going to change the minds of educated people. As you can see by the world slowly becoming more understanding. Homosexuals have all the reproductive parts just like heterosexuals, they can create life if they want. The excuse of reproduction is so tired out, i have argued with too many of you idiots just here on Youtube that i'm beginning to think you're all the same person trolling.
@Sebizzar You seem to be rather misinformed, imagining the enlightened masses embracing homosexuality while the uneducated few cling to their stale religion.
I'm a college grad with a high GPA and a former atheist.
Homosexuality is repulsive to the masses who voted against militant homosexuality with prop 8 AND prop 22 by wide margins in the liberal fortress of Californication.
Compare the box office sales figures of Brokeback Mountain to the cheesy Alvan and the Chipmunks movies.
@penguinistas I am not trolling, but now i wouldn't mind since everything you're saying is a joke. Go ahead, pray for me lol & my spelling is just fine. You are the 1 without real reason, just religion as excuses as i've said for the millionth time.
@Sebizzar One day, you will discover that God is very, very real. Much more real than all the material things we surround ourselves with.
I have found that those who reject Christ, often do so not because some evidence led them to that decision but because there was something they wanted to do that was forbidden in scripture. Many of Darwin's chief apologists openly admitted that was the reason they embraced evil-loution..
@penguinistas And regarding Leviticaliticus, i never said anything about the word "sodomy" i just said the word "homosexuality" did not exist in biblical times therefore you can't say "God hates homosexuality" or whatever. And obviously you religious freaks will never try to understand since you're devoted to being closed minded & shutting the doors to anything other than religion, so why are you even trying to argue?
@Sebizzar you're imagining that homosexuality is OK because (you say) the word did not exist back then and it's different than sodomy.
While you may consider the words different by some perceptible shade of gray, the Law of Moses doesn't have much gray in it and doesn't make such a distinction.
And considering that you misspelled Leviticus I doubt that you've spent any time objectively studying either ancient Hebrew or Greek.
You're the one who wanted to argue about my comment.
@penguinistas You were a former atheist but got brainwashed by religion how sad. And i misspelled "Leviticus" on purpose to mock it, jeez a college graduate couldn't get that...
@Sebizzar From someone who basically thought that God didn't know what a "homosexual" was and claimed that the Bible was silent on homosexuality, I've got limited expectations on your ability to reason (and spell).
I've never been brainwashed. The reason's for my conversion involve a powerful, supernatural God, who is very much alive, not a limited human religion or philosophy.
You use the word Black to pay respect to a certain group of people. Other meanings word black include: evil, wicked, dirty, filthy, and disgusting. Would you say that Blacks are so Black? Or that movie was so Black? Or gays are so Black? Hmmm, I don't think so. Why is paying respect and using a word to properly describe a group, as they should, obscene?
You get NO respect, because you earn none! You're an idiot, and clearly have no CLUE what you try to "explain"...
The ancient origins of "gay" are uncertain, with some tracing it to the Old High German gâhi ("swift"), though wâhi ("pretty") is a more likely source. The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd) also notes that "the sense ‘slack, not closely fitting’, which exists in all the Romance languages (though not recorded very early in any of them) may possibly be of etymological significance."
'For The Record'..........an embarrassment to the truth movement and shouldn't be confused with the very high-quality material produced by Dave Emory, a REAL exposer of world elite criminality. Here's his site: spitfirelist (dot) com.
your cheap shot is so typical. LMAO. Most people who are pro-heterosexual are NOT closeted gays you imbecile. You have the mind of a 12 year old. LMAO!
That was a cheap shot on your part lambasting my use of LMAO. I don't believe in the PC term "homophobic". Maybe he just does not like the gay lifestyle or the gay agenda and he is well within his right to maintain this belief. If a person does not like broccoli does that make him a broccoliphobe? This demonstrates how ridiculous the term homophobe is. I am laughing my ass off at your ignorant attempt to be a champion for a lost cause.
@Rahbinah And I am laughing at how much of a hypocritical & stupid person you are. You're the ignorant one attempting to be a "champion" for your lost cause (homophobia). Like I said, all you guys do is complain about how "homophobic" isn't a real word, always trying to avoid the real reason why you hate gay people, which is ignorance, stupidity, denial, etc.
Did you ever see me say I hate gay people? How absurd. I don't hate gay people. Gays are human just like everyone else. What I don't like is the gay agenda and gay propaganda. I also do not like feminism or feminist propaganda. Does this make me a woman hater? I am a woman, by the way. For you to call me stupid is another cheap shot. Try again. I'll be waiting for an intelligent rebuttal, but I doubt you can provide one. Why are you so full of vitriol, by the way?
@Rahbinah You don't have to say the specific word, you've said enough to show your hatred. "Gay agenda"? "Gay propaganda"? I assume by those terms you mean tolerance & equality for all? I didn't know it was some kind of agenda or propaganda to let the world know that we want to love who we love & live our lives in peace.
Ah yes hate crimes, the equivalent of someone simply not liking you. I'm sure that's what you'd say if a Muslim, Jew, or Atheist attacked you because you are a Christian.
Gee. I wonder if queer life expectancy being 80% of straight life expectancy has anything to do with beatings, homelessness from being rejected by hateful "god-fearing" parents" or the increased rates of depression and anxiety caused by being constantly marginalized for the person you are by people in your community.
You gotta be careful when you come into the atheist/homosexual church (Youtube) and start opening the windows and throwing the light on them. Funny how every other video you put out has overwhelming support except these. Keep up the good work.
No way guys, he isn't a homophobe, he just associates all gay people with cross dressers and people whom dress silly in parades.
Which is why it's 100% ok for me to associate all religious people with terrorists, and the westbro baptist church with their thank go for dead soldiers signs.
@Shonem I'd really like to see a gay person who doesn't dress up xD and I have a lot of gay friends, they dress up as girls on occasion and the ones that don't, want to if they had the money.
@Shonem Quite the contrary here in California, my gay friends even think so. I think it's a waste of time either side of the argument. Evil will die out because it's self destructive so who ever dies out, the other side wins.
Fuck you! What are you autistic or something? You have to be with your logic. You're using outdated facts to try and prove that the LGBT community is this horrendous terroristic threat. The reality is, we aren't looking for special rights, we're looking for equality. There is also no such thing as an ex-gay. You can't change a person's sexual orientation. Many would be "ex-gays" have actually come forth and exposed how bogus the whole concept is. DIE!
most homosexuals are fake and need to get sent to an asylum for their mental illness...How can u decide that from now on ur gonna act gay and fuck a man like yourself? this is just fucking mentall ilness.Only a few are truely gay and usually they will act as they are from a young age ..
@sheyon1000 Fuck you bitch! The only people who need to go to asylums are freaks like you! You need to get cleansed of all that hate and bigotry running through your veins. The world is getting more progressive when it comes to LGBT equality. Would you like to join the rest of us in the 21st century or be left in the dust? Your choice. Personally I think you should tie a rope around your neck and jump.
@HailSatan2009 a wannabbe satanist freask is lecturing me and judging me..u are even worst then these twisted minded fucks.your type should be shot on sight.
@sheyon1000 You can't even spell I've got you in such a frenzy. HAHAHAHAHAHA! Shut the fuck up and go suck on your mum's tit. Way to support freedom of religion there buddy. Now there's an idea! If all christ fags were shot then we'd probably be building space stations around Jupiter in another decade. Your kind is what hinders progress. You mad boy? Huh? Huh? You mad? Huh? LMFAO!!!!!!!!
As a Christian, I believe that Christians should spend more time/energy being like Christ than going all anti-homosexuality. Read what Jesus said/did. He had compassion on people, especially those viewed as the 'worst sinners.' He lived a pure life and pointed people to Him and away from sin. Sin includes arrogance, belittling, and stirring up wrath. Christians are to be Christ-followers.
@Dman33599 How did Jesus respond to the woman caught in adultery who was about to be stoned? He stopped the stoning. He did not condone the sin, but He had mercy on the woman. Mercy is at the core of the Gospel, and without it, we're all hopelessly cut off from God (homosexual or not).
@SapphirePanorama Jesus was merciful, but God stills says that homosexuality is wrong, and they were killed for it. faggots 2day are even worse, having gay parades and sexualy explicit infront of the public, they sould be killed acording to the bible
@Dman33599 God says homosexuality and other sins are wrong, but the point of Christianity is that Jesus Christ came to save sinners. Condemning homosexuals is twisting the Gospel, because the Gospel is about redemption. Paul labels himself as the worst of sinners, yet redeemed by Christ Jesus. The question is, where should a Christian's focus be - on the law that condemns each one of us or on Jesus who mercifully came to redeem us? I believe Scripture is very clear.
@Dman33599 Killed or repent? Those words totally disregard Christ and the New Testament (which are the core of Christianity). We're ALL worthy of death because of our sin. Morality cannot make us worthy in God's eyes - only grace through faith in Jesus Christ.
@Dman33599 God hates fags! Wait a minute, didnt God create man in His image? They chose to be gay! But why would one CHOOSE to be discriminated against? They want to be different, duh! What about all the teens who committed suicide because they couldnt gain acceptance for their born-into lifestyle? Gotta love the logic of you dumbass Christians.
Deviants..so sad..why waste your life..you have my pity
reasonvsuropinion 5 days ago
For the Record: This video is SO Hetero!
ChaosMew161 6 days ago
So, this basically destroys your own argument in another video of yours where you said "tea-partiers are not homophobic" Perhaps some aren't, but you sir, you take the cake. Pray a shroud of protection and carry pepper spray? What the fuck is wrong with you?
TimeWillShadow 2 weeks ago 3
@TimeWillShadow A phobia is an irrational fear of something. That is not what Molotov exhibits. He displays a very conscious, deliberate hatred of the homosexual lifestyle, for logical reasons stemming from his religious beliefs. Neither fear nor irrationality is involved.
Words have meanings. Use them correctly.
Halo4Lyf 1 week ago
@Halo4Lyf You're correct with the definition of phobia but you assume that homophobia is simply a phobia of homosexuals and that is where you are wrong. In fact the word has evolved to mean not just fear but also antipathy and hatred towards homosexuals. Words have meanings, you should do some research on this. Also, I am unsure that the bible gives anybody the ability to reasonably infer logical reasons for the hatred of any group of people. It doesn't seem very Christ-like to me.
TimeWillShadow 1 week ago
@TimeWillShadow How very Orwellian of you. We don't hate them. We hate what they do, how they live. If we hated them, why would we be trying to secure for them eternal life?
Halo4Lyf 1 week ago
@Halo4Lyf You're using that word, Orwellian. I don't think it means what you think it means.
Regardless, I'm sick of arguing on this rather hateful guy's youtube video. You can privately message me if you really want to continue our friendly banter.
TimeWillShadow 1 week ago
@TimeWillShadow I disagree the word is self-explanatory. You cannot alter the meaning of one by your own opinion or mine
reasonvsuropinion 5 days ago
@reasonvsuropinion You guys are hilarious. It's not my opinion that has changed the word, it's what the word itself is defined as. Here, copied word for word from merriam-webster: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals. Note that not just irrational fear is what this word denotes.
TimeWillShadow 5 days ago
I got a shirt too.It says Morons are so Stupid. What do you mean by Stupid? I don't know
it's
your
word.
Stupid originally meant being in a stupor due to the influence of a substance or condition. But far right nimrods hated that so they changed it to better describe far right nimrods.
Also, FOR THE RECORD, homosexuals didn't start using the term gay to mean homosexual, heterosexuals did. They didn't apply it to themselves any more than African Americans applied the N-Bomb to themselves.
PhokenKuul 1 month ago
hey in case you were wondering being homosexual isn't a choice let me put it this way, if you had a choice betwen liking girls and not being made fun of for it or liking men and being treated like shit for it let me know what you choose it is how they are born dumbass
CBOvechkin8 1 month ago
@CBOvechkin8 Tell the Christians in muslium run countriesor in china they were the "born" that way..No it is a choice..unlike hair ,skin or eye color Just as Christians chose to be in life threatening danger for their beliefs..so go the homosexuals
reasonvsuropinion 5 days ago
You get a thumbs up, sir
DenverCholoX3 1 month ago
This guys a fag
scraigw 1 month ago
you are what's wrong with america.
Dadevster2 1 month ago
Damn you are deep in that closet, buried under a pile of panties you are too afraid to wear.
Vanidecb 1 month ago
This video is like a frothy mix of gay people and some guy with a poop beard.
invisiblesanta 1 month ago
Do something on the word niggardly next. It'll be HILARIOUS AND EVERYONE WILL NOTICE HOW CLEVER YOU ARE.
TheCareertalk 1 month ago
what the hell is wrong with your brain
turnsey 1 month ago
This video is little more than a bigoted, hateful, vile piece of revolting trash made by some fat douchebag with ugly tattoos who's never been to a pride parade or festival in his life. If he has, he'd know that 99% of the people there are dressed in ugly tank tops, cargo shorts, and flip flops. Christ, I WISH more the of men wore dresses and makeup, it'd make the whole event a hell of a lot more interesting to everyone!
keeneboy7700 1 month ago
you guys are nutters
carlmark80 1 month ago
How in god's name can someone be so fixated on who someone else has sex with? I mean having a regressive and terrible political opinion is one thing but this man is totally obsessed with gay people.
maxxbot 1 month ago
Wow you put a lot of effort into hating a group of people who have never done anything to you. Jesus must be so proud of his little chinless, pube beard freak, making all these videos advocating hate and armed revolution.
DublinFiller 1 month ago
@DublinFiller Because you are a sick sex pervert that belongs in prison for crimes against God and against humanity.
RevSpitz11 1 month ago
Comment removed
DublinFiller 1 month ago
@RevSpitz11 Coming from the guy the SPLC wrote this about;
He rails against "filthy faggots" and "lesbos." Islam is "Satanic," Arabs are "Rag-Heads," and Muslims "should not be allowed to live in the United States." New York City is a "sex perverted cesspool" that richly deserved Sept. 11.
DublinFiller 1 month ago
@DublinFiller Haha, hey at least you can say you ran into the Reverend Donald. Usually idiots you meet on the internet aren't so insufferable that they have a SPLC and Wikipedia entry.
roguetrick 1 month ago
@roguetrick Haha, seriously, wasn't expecting that to pop up when I googled his name. Also, I laughed pretty hard at him calling me a sex pervert.
DublinFiller 1 month ago
Looks like I'm the 1000th comment, so I'll just take this opportunity to say: I too wish those nasty gays would stop practicing infidelity and be more like our politicians... Newt Gingrich or John Edwards, say.
Oceanmachine27 1 month ago
awful + ur fat
sithren 1 month ago
The gay culture has not earned one bit of respect. Like spoiled children, they have demanded it, despite overwhelming proof of their own self-destructive tendencies. That is exactly why they get ZERO respect. The politicians and the media are spineless, but most people see right through the charade.
fatboyups 1 month ago
I'm sure his T shirt reads now : for the record my butt hurts !
smartazuis 2 months ago
BTW, it was nice seeing your true self talk to its homosexual-hating exterior at 00:20.
Yeger666 2 months ago
In regards to pride parades: while those who come to these parades dressed like drag queens are doing the cause of equality a disservice, the whole "children shouldn't be there" is a load of bullshit. Nobody in those parades wears clothes more revealing than what people wear when they go to a swim, yet I can't find one conservatives who says children shouldn't be allowed to go to the beach. I wouldn't be surprised though if I learned that you force you wife to wear a "burqini".
Yeger666 2 months ago
Nobody's entitled to respect and nobody expects the government to act otherwise. If you want to remain a homophobic bigot it's your right, and don't expect any person whose mind inhibits the 21st century to respect you.
Yeger666 2 months ago
Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen detail a three-stage plan to homosexualize America in their book, After the Ball. They describe the plan to further the gay agenda and homosexualize America as a threefold plan, “desensitize, jam, and convert.”
Rahbinah 2 months ago
Here’s a quote from the father of gay activism: “We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools…. in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms…wherever men are men together. Your sons will become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us” [Michael Swift, Gay Community News, 15 February 1987]. How about your man Harry Hay?
Rahbinah 2 months ago
Here’s a quote from the father of gay activism: “We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools…. in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms…wherever men are men together. Your sons will become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us” [Michael Swift, Gay Community News, 15 February 1987]. How about your man Harry Hay?
Rahbinah 2 months ago
so I can say "niggers are so black"
YTSlakteren 2 months ago
Not to sure I completely agree with you Sebizzar but to be honest these fascists would happily lock a guy up for being gay and stop abortions. Which in turn puts more kids up for adoption. Which gives gay families children. Hmm, republicans accidentally got something right...sort of.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO Actually homosexuals are the fascists, preferring to advance their radical militant agendas through the courts against the plainly stated will of the people.
As they couldn't get "gay marriage" at the ballot box they usurped the will of the people through activist courts, overturning the rights and will of the people as expressed in prop 8 and prop 22 which passed by wide margins.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas That's not fascism. Fascism is a radical authoritarian nationalist political ideology. It advocates the creation of a totalitarian single-party state that seeks the mass mobilization of a nation through discipline, indoctrination, physical education, and family policy (such as eugenics). You on the other hand described a loophole.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO Well that's the wikipedia definition. In general, I would have described fascism as the merger of state and corporate powers under a dictator.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas In other words it's right wing. Anyway, don't you find it a bit unfair to control people's lives. If you really think we should control people who were born differently AND you believe God created all of us (yer I know, it's stupid but bear with me) and God is all knowing, powerful et cetera. therefore his creations are beyond are understanding then how can we claim to know that controlling God's creation is a good thing. Surely it's against God.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO Ahhh... I see the problem... you've had a public education. Teachers unions are notoriously left wing and are loath to admit the sins of the left.
Fascists are left wing (not right wing). You have to look at what fascists actually did not what liberal apologists trying to disavow fascism say.
Nazi is short for National SOCIALIST. Hitler hated Christians, was in favor of abortion, euthanasia, eugenics, gun control and loved big government. Hitler was clearly left wing.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas No stupid, he wasn't. Hitler only manipulated Christmas to remove the Jewish born Christ to stop an uprising of Jews. Euthanasia was to eradicate the handicapped from his perfect race, Hitler was only pro-abortion because he had a low respect for the human life and just wanted to keep his populous happy enough so they roll over and play dead, big government so he could control people.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO You're trying to draw a distinction between left wing policies and Hitler's, even suggesting left wing abortion and euthanasia are better than his.
You said “manipulated Christmas to remove the Jewish born Christ to stop an uprising of Jews”. That's pure fiction. Hitler confiscated guns to prevent Jewish uprisings.
Hitler showed his love for Christianity by imprisoning 100's of priests on invented charges and turning churches into indoctrination centers.
Hitler was left wing
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas He started left wing but only to manipulate the people into putting him in power during a depression. Anyone who gets into power then tears out the unions that put him there is right wing. In the depression not accepting abortion is stupidity. He needed to save cash and prepare for war. Like I said, he was right wing but not HUGELY right wing, just a bit.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO You're desperate and you're lying, making up stories to cover for your lack of evidence. There is no way you can establish anything close to what you've claimed.
Hitler, National SOCIALIST, abortion, gun control, eugenics, euthanasia, big government micromanaging things and destruction of individual rights.
Hitler policies were always left wing and he never ever moved to the right.
It's impossible to have intelligent debate if you are going to lie.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas I'm not lying. Hitler DID destroy the unions, Hitler DID prepare for war and Hitler was a hateful, racist right wing extremist. Right wing extremist doesn't mean he was hugely left or right wing. It means he was extremely fascist. Your picking and choosing data to say he was ONLY left wing but that's a total lie. Even your big government thing is wrong because Hitler's big government was about control while socialist big government is about equal opportunity.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO Your public school education is a real handicap.
Hitler replaced existing unions with Nazi unions (the DAF).
"I am convinced that we cannot possibly dispense with the trades unions. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions in the economic life of the nation"
Hitler in Mein Kampf
AND
Liberal lefties got American troops involved in most of our wars. (D) Woodrow Wilson / WWi, (D) FDR / WWII, (D) Harry Truman / Korea, (D) JFK / Vietnam, (D) Obama / Libya.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas Wiki explains it better than me. Nazism, the common short form name of National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus) was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and Nazi Germany. It is a unique variety of fascism that incorporates biological racism and anti-Semitism.
Nazism was founded out of elements of the far-right racist völkisch German nationalist movement and the violent anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary culture that fought against the uprisings of
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO I would never trust wikipedia for anything remotely political or controversial. It's too easily manipulated by people with agendas and wikipedia has some insane rules which allow bold faced lies to be published so long as they are printed in a well respected source.
the brutal and violent history of African slave trade with Islamic nations is routinely scrubbed from it's pages for such reasons.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas So in other words your taking the information that you can see for yourself is true and ignoring it because it proves you wrong. So we're just ignoring Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan. There exempt though aren't they. Bush STARTS 3 wars and these guys JOIN wars to HELP people and suddenly they're the bad guys. However Nixon almost puts the entire Earth into a nuclear wasteland for trying to make his MISSILE bigger than the other guys and he's just dandy???
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO What truth? Who's truth? Wikipedia is extremely flawed and is notoriously prone to groups rewriting history to suit their ideologies
As Wikipedia authors remain nameless and faceless, it allows them to print lies or remove inconvenient truth with impunity
For example, the long and brutal history of Islamic nations, seizing Africa slaves was at one time was included in wikipedia but was later removed by an Islamic apologist
war mongering left wingers started MOST of the wars
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas The whole USA is full of war mongers. The fact the right wings like to give there people guns to encourage war just proves my point. Yes we're heard about your African slaves already. It's very hard to keep a strongly debated argument on wiki BUT any argument put forward has to have valid sources of which plenty justify the statement that Hitler tricked his people into helping him kill Jews, Marxists (Marxism is left wing btw, Hitler hated it) and socialist Russia.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO Regarding sources of information. I prefer to know who wrote the info as it helps expose any biases.
The questions of bias surrounding the gay activist who found the "gay gene" were found to be fully justified after other researchers were not able to reproduce his findings.
Guns discourage violence. The left wing Nazi's confiscated guns in the name of public safety before marching the Jews off to the gas chambers. The Jews in the Warsaw ghetto survived till their ammo ran out.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas So where does your info come from. Him ^ or Fox News?
The gay gene doesn't exist in the way we thought it did but people are still born gay.
Guns encourage stupidity and violence. I could name many reasons guns are bad. The main one being people are bad. People's homes are invaded by armed assailants all the time in the US because guns are legal. Jews were labelled and segregated and NOT at war when they were singled out. guns wouldn't have helped anyone there.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO To assume that all people are bad is paranoia.
To disarm honest citizens of the best way to defend themselves, and their families from the real bad guys is elitist arrogance and hypocrisy.
Your ignorance of history is astounding. The Jews in the Warsaw ghetto of Poland held off the Nazi's till their ammo ran out. Finish militias held off the Russian Army in WWII.
If guns encourage violence then do matches encourage arson?
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas Hey lets look at Norway they LOVE guns right now. What with that Christian extremist Anders Behring Breivik killing 77 people and wounding 151 with a rifle, a pistol and a car bomb. Norway thought this was such a great step they made guns free with any kids meal at McDonald's...wait no...they tightened there gun laws. Funny that.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO So you're saying a country should disarm it's citizens based upon the actions of one man, in the name of safety. Would you then band smoking and alcohol too in the name of safety?
Let's think like adults. Hitler: 12 million dead, Stalin: 20 million, Mao Zedong: 50+ million, Pol Pot: 2+ million (there are many, many more).
Each tyrant imposed gun control in the name of disarming criminals but then committed mass murder.
And, millions of people have PREVENTED crime with guns.
penguinistas 2 months ago
Comment removed
penguinistas 2 months ago
Comment removed
penguinistas 2 months ago
@HobbsO More liberal spin. If a priest molests a choir boy, Liberals blame Christianity or the Catholics and will ignore the fact that the priest was a homosexual.
While we're looking at other countries, lets look at the Swiss. Every home has automatic weapons (part of their mandatory militias) and their rate of gun crime is about zero.
Breivik wrote in his manifesto that he is not religious, has doubts about God's existence, and does not pray (some Christian).
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas It's more to do with spending time in the military than owning a gun. Lets look at the USA. Guns are like sweets there and the ACCIDENTAL shooting rate is more than enough to make an argument to why guns are bad. You then give those guns to the small number of "bad guys" and all hell breaks loose. He was a fundamentalist dumb ass. wrote about faith and fear of Islam. Swiss guns in homes only have 1 clip and are inspected regularly to see if the container they are in
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO What kind of moron are you? Swiss children carry rifles slung over their backs while riding their bicycles down the street, so where's your source for this nonsense about the Swiss only having 1 clip"? For a reserve soldier,1 clip is a minimum requirement not a maximum allowable.
If gun laws could disarmed criminals then drug laws should have already rid the US of drugs too, but they haven't. Stupid liberal guns laws only disarm "LAW ABIDING" citizens not "LAWLESS" criminals.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas Oh so you just "forgot" the part where I said (in essence) "military training causes less crime". Also bought guns have to be taken in public without ammunition in the magazine, the weapon has to be taken directly to the desired use (e.g. shooting range), and to carry a Swiss gun in public requires a permit. UK gun crime rate is 0.07 per 100,000, Switzerland is 0.56 and the USA is 2.97. Oh and finally not if your police weren't utterly useless.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@penguinistas has been opened. Little bit different. I agree it works but the US laws on guns are just stupid. I never said all people are bad but to assume no people are bad is ignorance. Smoking in public should be outlawed as it endangers others around you. Alcohol on the other hand is purely self destructive so go wild. That uprising caused the deaths of 254,000–300,000 Jews that could have been saved later in the war. People who prevent crime with guns are preventing gun crime
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO Your stupidity about the Jews of the Warsaw ghetto would be laughable if they were not so evil.
To suggest that the Jews who resisted being dragged to a Nazi death camp that it "caused the deaths" is a profane lie and spits upon the honor of those who fought to save their families from the death camps that were the horrific end of12 million people WHO DID NOT RESIST.
You are a pig.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas Actually the people resisted so the Nazis accelerated the process to kill them in a 2 month stint to set an example. They killed 17 German soldiers and sped the demise of 254,000–300,000 Jews.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@penguinistas communist revolutionaries in post WWI Germany. The ideology was developed first by Anton Drexler and then Adolf Hitler as a means to draw workers away from communism and into völkisch nationalism. Nazi political strategy focused on anti-big business, anti-bourgeois, and anti-capitalist rhetoric, though such aspects were later downplayed in the 1930s to gain the support from industrial owners for the Nazis; focus was shifted to anti-Semitic and anti-Marxist themes.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO racism is a left wing thing as it gives them a scapegoat to hate. For example...
The leftist democrat party was home for the KKK and gave birth to the Jim Crow laws. (D) lester maddox, (D) Bull Connor and (D) George Wallace fought for segregation and turned hoses on peaceful protesting blacks.
The republican party which created the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments was formed in 1854 as an abolitionist party. Lincoln, Fredric Douglas, MKL were right wing Republicans.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas don't get me wrong. Hitler's policies were actually very central all in all. Hit policies were more extremist UP on the government scale. However he was in fact a TEENY bit right wing.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@HobbsO Hitler (head of the National Socialists) and liberal Democrats (left wing) share the same views on big government, gun control, abortion, euthanasia, eugenics, confiscatory taxation, oppressive regulations, and the same hatred of the Jews.
That's the bulk of the political issues, and there's not much left. So how was Hitler "right wing"?
BTW, Lincoln, Frederick Douglass and MLK were right wing (republican). The KKK and Jim Crow on the other hand was left wing (democrat).
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas Hitler believed in social discrimination (right wing) while MLK by today’s standards, definitely a Democrat. He believed in social justice. King has become a national icon in the history of modern American liberalism. The right-wing today does not. Hitler also stopped unions and any kind of secret club or society (right wing). The KKK WAS left but is now right. You're comparing sides from 30-40 years ago to now. Things change. By MODERN standards Hitler was a righty
HobbsO 2 months ago
@penguinistas Lincoln was in agreement with the Democrats to fight a war with the South. The war was in no way about left and right wing. It was about industrialisation and one half of the country controlling the other. A few other things as well but you get the point. You can't take a view point and justify it by saying other people have the same view point therefore they are the same. Also Nick Griffin; SUPER right wing racist who hangs out with the KKK and white supremacist.
HobbsO 2 months ago
@penguinistas FINALLY don't let any ignoramus try to tell you that the Nazis must have been left-wing because they had the word "Socialist" in their party name. It was a misnomer. They were trying to coopt the term and get workign-man support, and it would only work with idiots. The Nazis were not in the least socialistic. They WERE, however, far right wing. Their anti-intellectual pandering to the alleged superior traditional values of the Volk is evidence enough.
HobbsO 2 months ago
People can't change their sexual orientation.
capitanzach 2 months ago
You hit the ball out of the park again Molotov. Great Job.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas Yeah, & apparently it hit you on the head if you think this guy is "great".
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar Molotov did do a great job, that you are on the wrong side of the debate is your problem.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas You're the one on the wrong side if you're supporting his homophobic views.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar A "phobia" is an unreasonable fear of something. So called "homophobia" would be an unreasonable fear of homosexuals. Pointing out that homosexuality is a sin is not an unreasonable fear, and therefore not "homophobic".
Rather I find that homosexuals are very phobic of free speech which does not bow the knee to the myths and sacred cows of homosexuality.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas Blah blah, all you homophobes are the same, always trying to justify a reason to not be called a homophobe. You do have an unreasonable fear, you're just using your religion as a cover up. Gay people aren't "phobic" of free speech, we are however going to stand up against hate speech & clearly stupid speech.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar I find that homosexuals (or perhaps liberals in general) don't debate very well and will lie and slander to defend their causes and fetishes. I really don't care if you think I'm homophobic or not, it's still a sin.
You said "using your religion as a cover up". I'll assume that you are actually smart enough to realize that the Jewish law, the Bible, and Islam plainly state that homosexuality is a serious sin.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas So you're turning this into a political thing now? And yeah, those are religions as well, what's your point? I don't care if you think it's a "sin" or not, the fact is that homosexuality is natural & okay, people are just slowly realizing it. So once again, using religion as an excuse to be homophobic. God never even said anything homophobic, people did.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar
There's plenty of verses in the bible to prove you wrong. 1 Cor 7:2, Rom 1:26-27, and there's plenty more. You can justify homosexuality out of your (or some other man's) own morality, but that's not what God thinks.. it's an abomination to Him, and He says so in His word.
DraughtOfPeace 2 months ago
@DraughtOfPeace Why are you ignoring the part where I told you God never even said anything homophobic, people did.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar
Those are verses from the bible, which are the word of God, which claims to be God-inspired. God hates it, He's declared it in His word over and over again. Check Leviticus 18:22, that's coming straight from His mouth. No middlemen, scribes or authors involved. "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, it is an abomination".
DraughtOfPeace 2 months ago
@DraughtOfPeace Nope, once again people wrote that book not God. And oh, he "hates" it, but i thought God doesn't hate? See, you just prove more that God may not be real when you make all these hypocritical statements. Besides, why exactly would he hate people loving each other? I'm sure spewing hatred, prejudice, beating people up, etc. is preferred in religion huh?
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar
If you don't believe God even exists, it's kinda hard to argue with you on this topic. The bible claims to be the word of God, people were inspired to write it, but He's the mastermind author. If you don't believe that, you don't believe the bible; as simple as that. And you don't get to define that God 'doesn't hate' or what he does do. God hates several things, as is written in the bible. The God of the bible is very different from the god you seem to have an opinion of.
DraughtOfPeace 2 months ago
@Sebizzar
Seriously though, you should read the bible before arguing about it. Otherwise, I'd just be wasting my time with an ignoramus who's arguing by pulling stuff out of his ass. You don't get to choose what God does or doesn't do, He's already revealed His character in the bible. He CAN set the rules for how people 'love' each other because he created said people in the first place. Read up before you argue further, I don't want to wrestle with another self-contrived God idea of yours
DraughtOfPeace 2 months ago
@DraughtOfPeace Well the God you believe in sounds like an asshole, just like you :0 So surprising...
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar
The God I believe is Jesus Christ, your creator and judge. Call him what you may while there's still time; because pretty soon, your knee will bow, and your tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.
DraughtOfPeace 2 months ago
@DraughtOfPeace You still leave cookies out for Santa don't you?
Sebizzar 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DraughtOfPeace You still leave cookies out for Santa don't you?
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@DraughtOfPeace *yawn* So did you leave cookies for Santa this Christmas?
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar Political thing??? Perhaps you're referring to the observation that liberals tend to debate poorly (lots of bluster, thin on substance).
Homosexuality is not natural or okay. The sick and perverse nature of a "gay pride" parade isn't even fit for a freak show.
And, there's no "natural" way for homosexual "couples" to produce children and therefore no way to pass on a mythical "gay gene".
Leviticus 20:13 describes homosexuality as "detestable" and punishable by death.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas Haha oh poor little you, so naive. It's very natural, it occurs not only in humans but in animals. And just because it doesn't involve reproduction doesn't mean it can't be natural. And gay people CAN have kids if they want. I never said anything about a "gay gene", but heterosexuals have homosexual children, want to explain that? And Leviticus blah blah, the word "homosexuality" did not even exist at that time so once again you're giving invalid excuses.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar You can pretend that homosexuality is natural if you want to but your self inflicted delusion is not binding upon others.
No, homosexuals pairs can not have children (you need one of each for that just as God designed it).
And regarding Leviticus and homosexuality, you really do have your head in the sand. Where did you think they got the word "Sodomy"? The destruction of Sodom in Genesis 19 happened at least 500 years before Leviticus was even written.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas You can pretend it's unnatural all you want, your delusion isn't going to change the minds of educated people. As you can see by the world slowly becoming more understanding. Homosexuals have all the reproductive parts just like heterosexuals, they can create life if they want. The excuse of reproduction is so tired out, i have argued with too many of you idiots just here on Youtube that i'm beginning to think you're all the same person trolling.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar You seem to be rather misinformed, imagining the enlightened masses embracing homosexuality while the uneducated few cling to their stale religion.
I'm a college grad with a high GPA and a former atheist.
Homosexuality is repulsive to the masses who voted against militant homosexuality with prop 8 AND prop 22 by wide margins in the liberal fortress of Californication.
Compare the box office sales figures of Brokeback Mountain to the cheesy Alvan and the Chipmunks movies.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas LOL wow, ok you're obviously just trolling, thanks for wasting my time.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar Actually you're the one who's trolling. I left a compliment for Molotov Mitchel and you're the one who left the "H8".
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas I am not trolling, but now i wouldn't mind since everything you're saying is a joke. Go ahead, pray for me lol & my spelling is just fine. You are the 1 without real reason, just religion as excuses as i've said for the millionth time.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar you said "without real reason, just religion as excuses".
So you're saying that "God" has no right as your creator and the one who sustains you to impose his will upon you or judge you. Is that right?
Then you may do whatever you please without fear of judgment or penalty. Is that right?
If God has no right to judge you, then can he judge Hitler? If he can, then why not you?
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas I know i agree with you, God must not be real then. Anyway HAPPY NEW YEAR xD
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar One day, you will discover that God is very, very real. Much more real than all the material things we surround ourselves with.
I have found that those who reject Christ, often do so not because some evidence led them to that decision but because there was something they wanted to do that was forbidden in scripture. Many of Darwin's chief apologists openly admitted that was the reason they embraced evil-loution..
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas And regarding Leviticaliticus, i never said anything about the word "sodomy" i just said the word "homosexuality" did not exist in biblical times therefore you can't say "God hates homosexuality" or whatever. And obviously you religious freaks will never try to understand since you're devoted to being closed minded & shutting the doors to anything other than religion, so why are you even trying to argue?
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar you're imagining that homosexuality is OK because (you say) the word did not exist back then and it's different than sodomy.
While you may consider the words different by some perceptible shade of gray, the Law of Moses doesn't have much gray in it and doesn't make such a distinction.
And considering that you misspelled Leviticus I doubt that you've spent any time objectively studying either ancient Hebrew or Greek.
You're the one who wanted to argue about my comment.
penguinistas 2 months ago
@penguinistas You were a former atheist but got brainwashed by religion how sad. And i misspelled "Leviticus" on purpose to mock it, jeez a college graduate couldn't get that...
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar From someone who basically thought that God didn't know what a "homosexual" was and claimed that the Bible was silent on homosexuality, I've got limited expectations on your ability to reason (and spell).
I've never been brainwashed. The reason's for my conversion involve a powerful, supernatural God, who is very much alive, not a limited human religion or philosophy.
I will pray for your deliverance from darkness.
penguinistas 2 months ago
You use the word Black to pay respect to a certain group of people. Other meanings word black include: evil, wicked, dirty, filthy, and disgusting. Would you say that Blacks are so Black? Or that movie was so Black? Or gays are so Black? Hmmm, I don't think so. Why is paying respect and using a word to properly describe a group, as they should, obscene?
MrSpeechie2010 2 months ago
You get NO respect, because you earn none! You're an idiot, and clearly have no CLUE what you try to "explain"...
The ancient origins of "gay" are uncertain, with some tracing it to the Old High German gâhi ("swift"), though wâhi ("pretty") is a more likely source. The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd) also notes that "the sense ‘slack, not closely fitting’, which exists in all the Romance languages (though not recorded very early in any of them) may possibly be of etymological significance."
Beowoulf69 2 months ago
EX-GAYS are GAY (Happy) most of the time. EX gays are the ones I respect more than practising ones.
ReciprocalZeugma 2 months ago
'For The Record'..........an embarrassment to the truth movement and shouldn't be confused with the very high-quality material produced by Dave Emory, a REAL exposer of world elite criminality. Here's his site: spitfirelist (dot) com.
MiracleMile90 2 months ago 2
homosexuals ARE gay!
oneperson2person 2 months ago
dude this guy is gay.
veeway 2 months ago
He seems to know an awful lot about gay parades. Most likely a frustrated closeted gay. Come out already dude, you are just hurting yourself
pop9900 2 months ago 2
@pop9900
your cheap shot is so typical. LMAO. Most people who are pro-heterosexual are NOT closeted gays you imbecile. You have the mind of a 12 year old. LMAO!
Rahbinah 2 months ago
@Rahbinah You sound like the 12 year old, shouting "LMAO". And "pro-heterosexual"? This guy is homophobic don't try to sugar coat it.
Sebizzar 2 months ago 2
@Sebizzar
That was a cheap shot on your part lambasting my use of LMAO. I don't believe in the PC term "homophobic". Maybe he just does not like the gay lifestyle or the gay agenda and he is well within his right to maintain this belief. If a person does not like broccoli does that make him a broccoliphobe? This demonstrates how ridiculous the term homophobe is. I am laughing my ass off at your ignorant attempt to be a champion for a lost cause.
Rahbinah 2 months ago
@Rahbinah And I am laughing at how much of a hypocritical & stupid person you are. You're the ignorant one attempting to be a "champion" for your lost cause (homophobia). Like I said, all you guys do is complain about how "homophobic" isn't a real word, always trying to avoid the real reason why you hate gay people, which is ignorance, stupidity, denial, etc.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
@Sebizzar
Did you ever see me say I hate gay people? How absurd. I don't hate gay people. Gays are human just like everyone else. What I don't like is the gay agenda and gay propaganda. I also do not like feminism or feminist propaganda. Does this make me a woman hater? I am a woman, by the way. For you to call me stupid is another cheap shot. Try again. I'll be waiting for an intelligent rebuttal, but I doubt you can provide one. Why are you so full of vitriol, by the way?
Rahbinah 2 months ago
@Rahbinah You don't have to say the specific word, you've said enough to show your hatred. "Gay agenda"? "Gay propaganda"? I assume by those terms you mean tolerance & equality for all? I didn't know it was some kind of agenda or propaganda to let the world know that we want to love who we love & live our lives in peace.
Sebizzar 2 months ago
Excellent!
pandrewblake 2 months ago
god this dude is gay.
brendanwynn 2 months ago
Lol this guy is king. Gays are so fucking gay
MegaHegira 3 months ago
Ah yes hate crimes, the equivalent of someone simply not liking you. I'm sure that's what you'd say if a Muslim, Jew, or Atheist attacked you because you are a Christian.
xGreydaysx 3 months ago
Sad, pathetic video... from a sad, pathetic man. Must suck to be on the wrong side of history.
thecookiemonster222 3 months ago
Gee. I wonder if queer life expectancy being 80% of straight life expectancy has anything to do with beatings, homelessness from being rejected by hateful "god-fearing" parents" or the increased rates of depression and anxiety caused by being constantly marginalized for the person you are by people in your community.
Naw. It's probably AIDs. Filthy faggots.
soonlaypale 3 months ago
@soonlaypale Hahaha! I love you <3
tecaltabiano 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You gotta be careful when you come into the atheist/homosexual church (Youtube) and start opening the windows and throwing the light on them. Funny how every other video you put out has overwhelming support except these. Keep up the good work.
waytruthlifedisciple 3 months ago
@tbutler419 that's pretty gay lol
Johnsin646 3 months ago
This guy is an asshole. Someone should put a dick in him.
tbutler419 3 months ago
@tbutler419 Only you would like that bro =/
IceBlood888 3 months ago
I've heard the statistic about homosexuality shortening lifespans by 8-20 years, but I can't find any references.
dameon692002 3 months ago
799 are so gay
fadilto 3 months ago
I like this video, I think is true but some people dont like the true if they dont fit in.
make more like this, thanks!
rodcarranza 3 months ago
No way guys, he isn't a homophobe, he just associates all gay people with cross dressers and people whom dress silly in parades.
Which is why it's 100% ok for me to associate all religious people with terrorists, and the westbro baptist church with their thank go for dead soldiers signs.
:D
Shonem 3 months ago
@Shonem
God*
Shonem 3 months ago
@Shonem I'd really like to see a gay person who doesn't dress up xD and I have a lot of gay friends, they dress up as girls on occasion and the ones that don't, want to if they had the money.
IceBlood888 3 months ago
@IceBlood888
It's an extremely small group in the community, I assure you.
If you would find me anywhere, I would probably be wearing camo on a hunting trip.
Or wearing jeans and a t-shirt.
The only people who want you to think that every gay person is a raving woman with a dick, are people like this loon.
Shonem 3 months ago
@Shonem Quite the contrary here in California, my gay friends even think so. I think it's a waste of time either side of the argument. Evil will die out because it's self destructive so who ever dies out, the other side wins.
IceBlood888 3 months ago
@IceBlood888
Even think so what?
O.o
What are you referring to?
Shonem 3 months ago
Fuck you! What are you autistic or something? You have to be with your logic. You're using outdated facts to try and prove that the LGBT community is this horrendous terroristic threat. The reality is, we aren't looking for special rights, we're looking for equality. There is also no such thing as an ex-gay. You can't change a person's sexual orientation. Many would be "ex-gays" have actually come forth and exposed how bogus the whole concept is. DIE!
HailSatan2009 4 months ago
I like the videos you guys post on revolution and gun rights, illuminati ect...... but your christian agenda is annoying
WorldMilitia 4 months ago
most homosexuals are fake and need to get sent to an asylum for their mental illness...How can u decide that from now on ur gonna act gay and fuck a man like yourself? this is just fucking mentall ilness.Only a few are truely gay and usually they will act as they are from a young age ..
sheyon1000 4 months ago
@sheyon1000 Fuck you bitch! The only people who need to go to asylums are freaks like you! You need to get cleansed of all that hate and bigotry running through your veins. The world is getting more progressive when it comes to LGBT equality. Would you like to join the rest of us in the 21st century or be left in the dust? Your choice. Personally I think you should tie a rope around your neck and jump.
HailSatan2009 4 months ago
@HailSatan2009 a wannabbe satanist freask is lecturing me and judging me..u are even worst then these twisted minded fucks.your type should be shot on sight.
sheyon1000 4 months ago
@sheyon1000 You can't even spell I've got you in such a frenzy. HAHAHAHAHAHA! Shut the fuck up and go suck on your mum's tit. Way to support freedom of religion there buddy. Now there's an idea! If all christ fags were shot then we'd probably be building space stations around Jupiter in another decade. Your kind is what hinders progress. You mad boy? Huh? Huh? You mad? Huh? LMFAO!!!!!!!!
HailSatan2009 4 months ago
@HailSatan2009 Satan is also a wimpy fag that takes it up the butt, nothing for Christians to fear
BADDOOKUS 3 months ago
@HailSatan2009 Christ fags? You really don't make any sense =/ I feel for you.
IceBlood888 3 months ago
As a Christian, I believe that Christians should spend more time/energy being like Christ than going all anti-homosexuality. Read what Jesus said/did. He had compassion on people, especially those viewed as the 'worst sinners.' He lived a pure life and pointed people to Him and away from sin. Sin includes arrogance, belittling, and stirring up wrath. Christians are to be Christ-followers.
SapphirePanorama 4 months ago
@SapphirePanorama True, but faggots back then were stoned, also adultery... belittling is not always a sin
Dman33599 4 months ago
@Dman33599 How did Jesus respond to the woman caught in adultery who was about to be stoned? He stopped the stoning. He did not condone the sin, but He had mercy on the woman. Mercy is at the core of the Gospel, and without it, we're all hopelessly cut off from God (homosexual or not).
SapphirePanorama 4 months ago
@SapphirePanorama Jesus was merciful, but God stills says that homosexuality is wrong, and they were killed for it. faggots 2day are even worse, having gay parades and sexualy explicit infront of the public, they sould be killed acording to the bible
Dman33599 4 months ago
@Dman33599 God says homosexuality and other sins are wrong, but the point of Christianity is that Jesus Christ came to save sinners. Condemning homosexuals is twisting the Gospel, because the Gospel is about redemption. Paul labels himself as the worst of sinners, yet redeemed by Christ Jesus. The question is, where should a Christian's focus be - on the law that condemns each one of us or on Jesus who mercifully came to redeem us? I believe Scripture is very clear.
SapphirePanorama 4 months ago
@SapphirePanorama Im just saying God hates fags, they arnt the worst people just bad people that should be killed or repent by biblical precepts
Dman33599 4 months ago
@Dman33599 Killed or repent? Those words totally disregard Christ and the New Testament (which are the core of Christianity). We're ALL worthy of death because of our sin. Morality cannot make us worthy in God's eyes - only grace through faith in Jesus Christ.
SapphirePanorama 4 months ago
@SapphirePanorama
I agree whold heartedly :) not only that but we have as much right as anyone else
metalalchemy7 3 months ago
GOD HATES, HATES FAGS
Dman33599 4 months ago
@Dman33599 God hates fags! Wait a minute, didnt God create man in His image? They chose to be gay! But why would one CHOOSE to be discriminated against? They want to be different, duh! What about all the teens who committed suicide because they couldnt gain acceptance for their born-into lifestyle? Gotta love the logic of you dumbass Christians.
SuperNoahZark 4 months ago