dude get a job cuz ur not going to make it as an artist. what a waste of canvas !!!
deputy1040 2 months ago
Jackson Pollock was a great artist ..........definitely not a tribute :(
scrappylor 2 months ago
I'll pay you ten dollars for the canvas; I can paint it over with a white ground and use it for something else. Canvases are expensive.
JeffersonDinedAlone 5 months ago
This looks exactly like any other Jackson Pollock painting to me.
hakkujin 5 months ago
primo requisito, work as process on horizontality, broken! this is No Pollock, dude!
madalene2012 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Might as well watch kids finger paint.
ThaMaseMan 10 months ago
Jackson Pollock??????????? heheheeeee Jackson Pollock do his work on the floor not hanging on the wall!!!
kaison2429 1 year ago 4
speaking of mud
zaprudermacphee 1 year ago
sorry mate... what you have done is bullshit... if u think that was funny you are wrong mate... but never mind coz no one will remember your name ....
serif7600 1 year ago
this is how you paint when you have no talent
randyallengregg 1 year ago
PAYASO!!!!
David17976 1 year ago
I don't understand all these guys who preted to paint in the name of Jackson Pollock. It's simply wrong. Why don't they take their own names?
airamanno 2 years ago 3
i think so.
s0xLiciouZ 2 years ago
the red takes on the look of blood spatter ala dexter on showtime
afgan01 3 years ago
Looks like more of a Norman Bluhm tribute. Since you did it all on the wall and went for more action than a dance above the canvas.
jeffreycollins 3 years ago
and what did you learn durring the proccess
no disrespect you did it you filmed and perhaps sold it good on you. but the physcial deeds have an origination at a deeper leavel
pollock enetered that leavel and the work sprange from that encounter. sponaneious momement in randowm chaotic or structured way is the surface....
pollock was a twin mind dynamic experincer
enaging the call being there and a part of his mind lost in the proccess.
mysticspiritman 3 years ago
dude get a job cuz ur not going to make it as an artist. what a waste of canvas !!!
deputy1040 2 months ago
Jackson Pollock was a great artist ..........definitely not a tribute :(
scrappylor 2 months ago
I'll pay you ten dollars for the canvas; I can paint it over with a white ground and use it for something else. Canvases are expensive.
JeffersonDinedAlone 5 months ago
This looks exactly like any other Jackson Pollock painting to me.
hakkujin 5 months ago
primo requisito, work as process on horizontality, broken! this is No Pollock, dude!
madalene2012 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Might as well watch kids finger paint.
ThaMaseMan 10 months ago
Jackson Pollock??????????? heheheeeee Jackson Pollock do his work on the floor not hanging on the wall!!!
kaison2429 1 year ago 4
speaking of mud
zaprudermacphee 1 year ago
sorry mate... what you have done is bullshit... if u think that was funny you are wrong mate... but never mind coz no one will remember your name ....
serif7600 1 year ago
this is how you paint when you have no talent
randyallengregg 1 year ago
PAYASO!!!!
David17976 1 year ago
I don't understand all these guys who preted to paint in the name of Jackson Pollock. It's simply wrong. Why don't they take their own names?
airamanno 2 years ago 3
i think so.
s0xLiciouZ 2 years ago
the red takes on the look of blood spatter ala dexter on showtime
afgan01 3 years ago
Looks like more of a Norman Bluhm tribute. Since you did it all on the wall and went for more action than a dance above the canvas.
jeffreycollins 3 years ago
and what did you learn durring the proccess
no disrespect you did it you filmed and perhaps sold it good on you. but the physcial deeds have an origination at a deeper leavel
pollock enetered that leavel and the work sprange from that encounter. sponaneious momement in randowm chaotic or structured way is the surface....
pollock was a twin mind dynamic experincer
enaging the call being there and a part of his mind lost in the proccess.
mysticspiritman 3 years ago