Yikes...Ridley, you might want to reconsider allowing these two SEXIST women to speak for you, or in your videos...or at least make them take a history class.
Renee and Jackie...corruption of power has NOTHING to do with what set of genitalia you have in your pants.
radical feminism has nothing to do with the restoration of Constitutional Government and the reclamation of our God given liberties. I don't know these ladies but they sound drunk and running off at the mouth. Radical feminism is in line with the Obama-bots and Hillary-ites, not the Patriot movement. I love the concept of the Free State project, but some of it rubs me the wrong way. I look with suspicion at the hippyish nature of some of it, and the radical neo-liberal tone to it all.
Evidently they haven't spent much time reading about the reigns of Queen Mary, Queen Elisabeth, Queen Ann, Queen Victoria, etc. all despots and abusers of government power.
The problem isn't the gender of the people in power, its the fact that people have power over other people by use of force.
Harry, could not agree more. Abuse of power is not gender specific and there are many many examples of feminist abuse of power and control over this government and men. If anyone doubts the reach of feminist abuse and power, just step into any of the thousands of "family (abuse) courts" around this country on any given day.
Do you have a source other then wikipedia where the referenced source is some obscure magazine article with no references itself. The wikipedia article on Abdülmecid I calls it a ''popular tale''.
Cough up a reliable source or stop being so bloody patronising.
Also if you think that the boar and Zulu wars were caused by the queens desire for pretty stones and not a series of well documented and complex political events then you are the one who is 'uninformed' or perhaps just deluded.
Not sure about your love for this old bag or why you would defend her but I'm not quoting Wiki or a magazine.
Try "Notices of The Country, its Navy, & present Prospects by Henry Christmas 1853 or New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education on May 2, 1996
As for the Boer Wars (not boar!), they were based on "well documented and complex political events" but it was ALL based on the gold and diamond mines. If you believe otherwise you are either uninformed or a fool.
The Notices of The Country, its Navy, & present Prospects by Henry Christmas 1853 has no mention of the queens involvement.
&
I never said gold and resources were not involved. You made it very clear that you thought that Boers and Zulus had died ''because she(the queen)liked diamonds'' Which is nonsense.
I defend her because you put her in with monarchs who actually had power and who actually had people killed as absolute rulers are tend to do. Victoria was just a figurehead. A constitutional monarch. Who spent most of her life hiding away in mourning.
Wait...how is this a debate? They're all agreeing with each other.
Taors 2 years ago
So....crossovers? Right leaning leftists? Or is this "militant confusion"?
oyate1960 2 years ago
Yikes...Ridley, you might want to reconsider allowing these two SEXIST women to speak for you, or in your videos...or at least make them take a history class.
Renee and Jackie...corruption of power has NOTHING to do with what set of genitalia you have in your pants.
Gooberlicious54 2 years ago 6
Like queen Elizebeth? Coruption is a human condition, it isnt gender spacific. These two are not very good representitves of liberty or unity.
xqj37alpha 2 years ago 6
radical feminism has nothing to do with the restoration of Constitutional Government and the reclamation of our God given liberties. I don't know these ladies but they sound drunk and running off at the mouth. Radical feminism is in line with the Obama-bots and Hillary-ites, not the Patriot movement. I love the concept of the Free State project, but some of it rubs me the wrong way. I look with suspicion at the hippyish nature of some of it, and the radical neo-liberal tone to it all.
porcupine07 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THANKS FOR WASTING MY TIME
Keep posting crapola like this and youll lose a subscriber
Vorpalbite 2 years ago
Evidently they haven't spent much time reading about the reigns of Queen Mary, Queen Elisabeth, Queen Ann, Queen Victoria, etc. all despots and abusers of government power.
The problem isn't the gender of the people in power, its the fact that people have power over other people by use of force.
5 stars as always Dave!
harryogre 2 years ago 7
Harry, could not agree more. Abuse of power is not gender specific and there are many many examples of feminist abuse of power and control over this government and men. If anyone doubts the reach of feminist abuse and power, just step into any of the thousands of "family (abuse) courts" around this country on any given day.
Great video Dave 5*
hornshwangler 2 years ago 3
Queen Victoria? All she did was let her prime ministers get on with it. And occasionaly give them an ear bashing on issues dear to her heart.
Now queen Cleopatra was a nasty peice of work.
Malthus0 2 years ago
well, Malthus0, that,s a cute but uninformed statement
Ask the dead Irish who starved because she turned away aid sent to them by the Ottomans
Her choice to turn away aid!
Ask the dead Boers or the dead Zulus who had to die because she liked diamonds.
Books. Their your friends. Read ones not written by court jesters.
harryogre 2 years ago
Do you have a source other then wikipedia where the referenced source is some obscure magazine article with no references itself. The wikipedia article on Abdülmecid I calls it a ''popular tale''.
Cough up a reliable source or stop being so bloody patronising.
Also if you think that the boar and Zulu wars were caused by the queens desire for pretty stones and not a series of well documented and complex political events then you are the one who is 'uninformed' or perhaps just deluded.
Malthus0 2 years ago
Malthus0
Not sure about your love for this old bag or why you would defend her but I'm not quoting Wiki or a magazine.
Try "Notices of The Country, its Navy, & present Prospects by Henry Christmas 1853 or New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education on May 2, 1996
As for the Boer Wars (not boar!), they were based on "well documented and complex political events" but it was ALL based on the gold and diamond mines. If you believe otherwise you are either uninformed or a fool.
harryogre 2 years ago
The Notices of The Country, its Navy, & present Prospects by Henry Christmas 1853 has no mention of the queens involvement.
&
I never said gold and resources were not involved. You made it very clear that you thought that Boers and Zulus had died ''because she(the queen)liked diamonds'' Which is nonsense.
Malthus0 2 years ago
I defend her because you put her in with monarchs who actually had power and who actually had people killed as absolute rulers are tend to do. Victoria was just a figurehead. A constitutional monarch. Who spent most of her life hiding away in mourning.
Malthus0 2 years ago
If you believe woman don't abuse power, you should work for my boss.
conqst3 2 years ago 6
Freedom is the best phenom.Good people great videos wish I was there.peace
twhittamore 2 years ago 6