Es ist eher Arschkriecherei seitens des nordkoreanischen Regimes bei Russland.
Natürlich weiß Russland, dass das nur oberflächlich ist und die Christen dort verfolgt werden, nur sind orthodoxe Christen davon nicht betroffen, weil es seit dem Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts keine orthodoxen Christen mehr in Korea gibt.
Trotzdem verfolgt Nordkorea Protestanten und Katholiken und stecken sie in sogennante Umerziehungslager, wo sie meistens sterben.
DDAAAAAYYYYYUM! Dose Choich be some sneak ass mofos! Just when a Nigga be thankin Noth Korea be a refuge....dey get der too....just DAAAYYYYYYYUUUUMMMMNNNN!
Please open the eyes of Russia. They say that they believe in You, praise You and adore You, yet they persecute me and my church for serving You. They build High Places for You, yet they demolished my church.
Dear God, my church has no place to gather to worship you. All has been taken away from us. In deep tears I live through my day.
Dear God, when I die, just promise me one thing. Promise me that You will meet me. Please God, because I am afraid of the Holy Russia.
North Korea's government severely limits free speech. We would never know if someone didn't like the ruling government, because political dissent is illegal and punishable by imprisonment and death. Yup. Just another form of republican government and model for human development.
Every kind of model for economic and social construction is a form of human development, whether you like it or not. Fom liberalism socialism, from capitalist imperialism to a juche society. Even fascism has its model fo human development. But every model has its dominated and dominators that is a lesson fom history
That's exactly what leftist guys do: they mess up everything and they think that's arguing with somebody. Well, that's not: the abnormality of American politics concerning environment has nothing to do with the fact that there is no freedom of expresion in DPRK.
But, if both things are wrong, at least I can complain about that in the US, and vote for another guy. Now, do I have that right in Korea?
I don't consider to have sufficient information about N. Korea to explain its system. What I really know is that koreans are really behind their leader and its not just the mere dictartorship CNN, Fox news, etc...say it is. You also shouldn't be saying those things because there is so little information about Korea and its all from north-american news agencies...not reliable.
It is at least suspicious that a man could stay in power for so many years as Kim Jong-Il. Meanwhile, if they were actually commited to the construction of a republic, they'd follow its most important feature: the limitation of time in power. That's why in the 18th and 19th century, there were rebellions against kings: and any man who considers himself a republican «lato senso», i.e., a man who sees the Republic as better than Monarchy, should have his time in power limited.
Dont be so eurocentric, there is more than one tipe of republican goberment and model for the human development. If north korean people feel so good about their leather it is logical to think they would want him there the most time possible. I believe republicanism means a lot of diferent things in each country, even inside Europe.
When it comes to political thought, you're either republican or monarchist. You either believe the power should stay for a lifelong period in the hands of a man, or not. in the second case, the leader himself should leave, on his own will, the power, after a certain period. That's not an eurocentric view of republicanism: that's a MARXIST view on republicanism!
ha! that is a LIBERAL view of republicanism sorry. And because of that, a bourgois view, not a revolutionary o marxist point of view of republicanism.
No, you can read any marxist work and you won't find on any of them a point of view legitimizing lifelong periods of power. And if those news agencies discredit governments opposing the US, according to Lenin's theories that would be because those Governments would be an obstacle to the imperialism of the bourgeoisie of the strongest capitalist country: therefore, the opposition towards them would come not only from news agencies, but from the whole corporative world: including YouTube.
What is important from a republic in a marxist point of view is that the people control the economic power, then also the political one. If they want to reelect their whole life a punctual leader then the legal sistem must permit it. A time limit to present to elections is a matter burgois legal sistems. NOTHING should stop the working class`s democracy.
That's false: the people must have the power but the Party must do all within his power to avoid the bureaucratization of the country, and a consequent retrocess to a system in which there are some who explore others. Therefore, any marxist party must adopt the republican paradigm of limited terms for politicians: in order to avoid bureaucracy, the most dangerous enemy of the revolution.
Im with you, bureaucratization is a cancer within any sistem wich should be fought by the Party. But there are other limits you know, like the figure o REVOCATION any kind of leader, even the president. With this mechanism you can allow a leader to present itself one and another time. There are more mechanisms...I told you, dont be EUROCENTRIC
If the president (wich doesnt Necessarily need to be the party leader) has been an excelent leader and has more merits than any other civilian, and obviously has more experience he is the most adecuatte for the job of coordinating a countries leadership. If the people propose him, he has de moral obligation to lead, if not, he has de revolutionary obligation to step away
Youtube also has its mecanisms of banning. Its is also important to think liberal sistems need to appear free unless they are in a menace. For example, someone who was posting determined venezuelan tv programs I know was banned because antena3, the spanish channel denounced the fact. But the venezuelan tv didnt mind. Why dindnt they denounce the venezuelan tv and not this youtube user?
But it doesn't ban all communist propaganda you post on it. And if there was such a conspiracy against public opinion of thoughts such as yours, there wouldn't be Lenin, Mao, and other communist's videos in this site.
Nope, you fall in an error there. I told you, capitalism gives freedom of speach normally, unless that freedom supposes a danger to its economic powers. I am no danger to any kind of power with youtube right now. My companion was...and so he was banned: youtube . com/user/lbracci
American companies? I said north-american news agencies. They are not reliable because they serve the interests of the economic powers of the USA. They allways try to bring down any kind of goberment who opposes its scheme of world economic and military domination
Nicaragua, El Salvador, Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela, Laos, USSR, Easter-europe, Chile, Greece, Ejipt, Iraq, Siria, Libia, Iran, etc... All these countries have suffered from deslegitimation of its antiimperialist policies by north american news-agencies
Hahaha, no doubt. No need for another headache for Russia. But I bet if they were part of the Soviet Union after world war 2, their lifestyle would have been quite different.
As a Byelorussian I empathize with the DPRK. The US also constantly threatens my country and belittles my President. Unlike the US, the DPRK and Belarus do not invade and occupy other countries; do not create riots when we don't like election results in other countries to bring down their regimes; do not expand a military machine like NATO; do not plan to put nuclear missiles in Poland and Czech Republic. Who is the bad guy here?
aber in Nordkorea ist es verboten ins Christentum zu bekehren????
das Regime müsste doch eigt. die Kirche abreißen und die Menschen die an Gott glauben alle festnehmen, ich verstehe nix mehr! XDD
irtgu8tg 6 months ago
@irtgu8tg
Es ist eher Arschkriecherei seitens des nordkoreanischen Regimes bei Russland.
Natürlich weiß Russland, dass das nur oberflächlich ist und die Christen dort verfolgt werden, nur sind orthodoxe Christen davon nicht betroffen, weil es seit dem Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts keine orthodoxen Christen mehr in Korea gibt.
Trotzdem verfolgt Nordkorea Protestanten und Katholiken und stecken sie in sogennante Umerziehungslager, wo sie meistens sterben.
Google einfach mal open doors
eymanwasgeht 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Better idea about Russain women gettop5.info
alizanorrellfht 1 year ago
DDAAAAAYYYYYUM! Dose Choich be some sneak ass mofos! Just when a Nigga be thankin Noth Korea be a refuge....dey get der too....just DAAAYYYYYYYUUUUMMMMNNNN!
bigblackdyx 1 year ago
완전히 이런 종교적인 것에도 주체사상 등을 예기하는 북한.....
leeswoo00 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear God,
Please open the eyes of Russia. They say that they believe in You, praise You and adore You, yet they persecute me and my church for serving You. They build High Places for You, yet they demolished my church.
Dear God, my church has no place to gather to worship you. All has been taken away from us. In deep tears I live through my day.
Dear God, when I die, just promise me one thing. Promise me that You will meet me. Please God, because I am afraid of the Holy Russia.
drtimofey 4 years ago
shut the fuck up you asshole
iliamakhnev 4 years ago
When is Russian pursued your church.
p.sRemember a crusade against orthodox 1242 года.Remember about a genocide Serbian .Remember about plunder by crusaders besantia
mixbor 3 years ago
just remove the space between w and .
rootincarnate 4 years ago
hrw. org/english/docs/2004/07/08/nkorea9040.htm
North Korea's government severely limits free speech. We would never know if someone didn't like the ruling government, because political dissent is illegal and punishable by imprisonment and death. Yup. Just another form of republican government and model for human development.
rootincarnate 4 years ago
Every kind of model for economic and social construction is a form of human development, whether you like it or not. Fom liberalism socialism, from capitalist imperialism to a juche society. Even fascism has its model fo human development. But every model has its dominated and dominators that is a lesson fom history
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
That's exactly what leftist guys do: they mess up everything and they think that's arguing with somebody. Well, that's not: the abnormality of American politics concerning environment has nothing to do with the fact that there is no freedom of expresion in DPRK.
But, if both things are wrong, at least I can complain about that in the US, and vote for another guy. Now, do I have that right in Korea?
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
you can vote another guy...wich is EXACLY the same ¿Real freedom? ¿Freedom to choose who is going to do what he wants and not what your people need?
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
At least I get to choose. What about North Koreans? Do they even have a choice, even between two candidates who will do the same?
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
I don't consider to have sufficient information about N. Korea to explain its system. What I really know is that koreans are really behind their leader and its not just the mere dictartorship CNN, Fox news, etc...say it is. You also shouldn't be saying those things because there is so little information about Korea and its all from north-american news agencies...not reliable.
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
It is at least suspicious that a man could stay in power for so many years as Kim Jong-Il. Meanwhile, if they were actually commited to the construction of a republic, they'd follow its most important feature: the limitation of time in power. That's why in the 18th and 19th century, there were rebellions against kings: and any man who considers himself a republican «lato senso», i.e., a man who sees the Republic as better than Monarchy, should have his time in power limited.
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
Dont be so eurocentric, there is more than one tipe of republican goberment and model for the human development. If north korean people feel so good about their leather it is logical to think they would want him there the most time possible. I believe republicanism means a lot of diferent things in each country, even inside Europe.
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
When it comes to political thought, you're either republican or monarchist. You either believe the power should stay for a lifelong period in the hands of a man, or not. in the second case, the leader himself should leave, on his own will, the power, after a certain period. That's not an eurocentric view of republicanism: that's a MARXIST view on republicanism!
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
ha! that is a LIBERAL view of republicanism sorry. And because of that, a bourgois view, not a revolutionary o marxist point of view of republicanism.
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
No, you can read any marxist work and you won't find on any of them a point of view legitimizing lifelong periods of power. And if those news agencies discredit governments opposing the US, according to Lenin's theories that would be because those Governments would be an obstacle to the imperialism of the bourgeoisie of the strongest capitalist country: therefore, the opposition towards them would come not only from news agencies, but from the whole corporative world: including YouTube.
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
What is important from a republic in a marxist point of view is that the people control the economic power, then also the political one. If they want to reelect their whole life a punctual leader then the legal sistem must permit it. A time limit to present to elections is a matter burgois legal sistems. NOTHING should stop the working class`s democracy.
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
That's false: the people must have the power but the Party must do all within his power to avoid the bureaucratization of the country, and a consequent retrocess to a system in which there are some who explore others. Therefore, any marxist party must adopt the republican paradigm of limited terms for politicians: in order to avoid bureaucracy, the most dangerous enemy of the revolution.
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
Im with you, bureaucratization is a cancer within any sistem wich should be fought by the Party. But there are other limits you know, like the figure o REVOCATION any kind of leader, even the president. With this mechanism you can allow a leader to present itself one and another time. There are more mechanisms...I told you, dont be EUROCENTRIC
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
But the party leader himself should give the example by stepping down after a period of time.
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
If the president (wich doesnt Necessarily need to be the party leader) has been an excelent leader and has more merits than any other civilian, and obviously has more experience he is the most adecuatte for the job of coordinating a countries leadership. If the people propose him, he has de moral obligation to lead, if not, he has de revolutionary obligation to step away
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
That ok, you are intelligent after all! ;)
Youtube also has its mecanisms of banning. Its is also important to think liberal sistems need to appear free unless they are in a menace. For example, someone who was posting determined venezuelan tv programs I know was banned because antena3, the spanish channel denounced the fact. But the venezuelan tv didnt mind. Why dindnt they denounce the venezuelan tv and not this youtube user?
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
But it doesn't ban all communist propaganda you post on it. And if there was such a conspiracy against public opinion of thoughts such as yours, there wouldn't be Lenin, Mao, and other communist's videos in this site.
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
Nope, you fall in an error there. I told you, capitalism gives freedom of speach normally, unless that freedom supposes a danger to its economic powers. I am no danger to any kind of power with youtube right now. My companion was...and so he was banned: youtube . com/user/lbracci
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
Meanwhile the socialist Korea is as legitimate and any other country, and even more than the south: imposed by north american force.
Do care about achieving your own countrie's real freedom , american, and not getting to choose between Pepsi and Coca-Cola, Republican or "Democrat".
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
By the way: if you don't consider american companies reliable, why are on YouTube?
Senhorvilela 4 years ago
American companies? I said north-american news agencies. They are not reliable because they serve the interests of the economic powers of the USA. They allways try to bring down any kind of goberment who opposes its scheme of world economic and military domination
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
Nicaragua, El Salvador, Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela, Laos, USSR, Easter-europe, Chile, Greece, Ejipt, Iraq, Siria, Libia, Iran, etc... All these countries have suffered from deslegitimation of its antiimperialist policies by north american news-agencies
Sovietrafa 4 years ago
There are eastern orthodox in DPRK?
that is awesome.
angryjungel 4 years ago
North Korea adores Russia. It's culture etc. I would say they would be happier being part of Russian Federation.
akibem1 5 years ago
Oh yes, 23 million of hungry north koreans is all we need..
Lengsel75 4 years ago
Hahaha, no doubt. No need for another headache for Russia. But I bet if they were part of the Soviet Union after world war 2, their lifestyle would have been quite different.
akibem1 4 years ago
OK: now you only have to prove me there's freedom of speech, association, press, political ideology, etc.
Senhorvilela 5 years ago
This is a real church and in russian TV. I saw it inside and the serve in church too!
Go to watch your stupid holywood movies!
dknight11 5 years ago
The real questions are will the church be used as a church, and will the people that go to the church be left alone.
HVACSoldier 5 years ago
Long live the DPRK!
marcelthemaoist 5 years ago
As a Byelorussian I empathize with the DPRK. The US also constantly threatens my country and belittles my President. Unlike the US, the DPRK and Belarus do not invade and occupy other countries; do not create riots when we don't like election results in other countries to bring down their regimes; do not expand a military machine like NATO; do not plan to put nuclear missiles in Poland and Czech Republic. Who is the bad guy here?
3aCCCP 5 years ago
doesnt make that country good. n they are just licking russia's ass...i know im russian
h3dg3 5 years ago
they aren't serving in the church.... why didn't we see the inside of the church? this is blatant wolf-man communist north korean propaganda
metallicism 5 years ago
Maybe because you only saw one fucking minute of the report dumbass!
jaksa1983 5 years ago
bullshit - propaganda
HarryOnara 5 years ago
Propoganda is the shit the americans talk about, Fuck You!
BurningHammer19 5 years ago
why use the f word ?
jaroff18 5 years ago