Added: 3 years ago
From: Ma5terViking
Views: 4,677
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How. The. Fuck.

  • haha this level is done in 9.6 seconds

  • great!

    u have other record?

    plis post the second boss video of the second episode i am in the first one and wanna see a way to kill de second

  • How do you do the wall glitch? My best time is 13 also but i know i can get it at least to 11 if i know how to do the wall glitch. Please Comment back. Thank Tou.

  • On steroids, I just strafe run against the edge of the box where the self-destruct button is and die accidentally. I needs some luck and timing skills to press the button before dying though...

    And the common way to do it:

    1) Find a corner where this wall glitch is possible (there are very many of them, at some of them the wall glitch happens easier than at some others)

    2) Strafe run alongside either wall as fast as possible and hit the corner. Turning slowly at the corner can help sometimes.

  • Great. My record's 00:13!

    I suggest that you use Cycles=max when playing duke nukem to avoid any possible slow down

  • Cycles=max smoothens the game when I'm not recording, but recording takes so much resources that it doesn't help (or doesn't help much or even makes the game run less smooth).

    Better fps would help, but I play on my laptop whose processor is AMD Turion 64 x2 Mobile Technology (1.8 GHz) so there are much faster computers. So to make this run a bit easier to compare to, I decided to raise the emulated cycles / ms so high that my computer can still barely handle it and then tell you the number.

  • I didn't actually consider that lol

  • Use Intel and you are faster. Core 2 Duo @2x2GHz rocks DSOBOX at all.

  • Maybe the build they share is optimized for Intel processors? Maybe I could try to build DosBox so that it will be optimized for AMD processors? But I don't think any free C++ compiler offers better optimization for AMD... Not that it matters much anymore: My old laptop broke down and it seems I'm going to get a new one with Core 2 Duo :)

  • Maybe it works but it isn't worth it, not only because your old laptop is broken.

    AMD-Processors are heater coils:

    Laptop with Core 2 Duo 2GHz 35W CPU, same Battery-Capacity and similar energy configuration: 3-4 h

    Laptop with AMD processor X2 technology (2 GHz): 1 - 2 h...

    So if AMD does not come with energy saving processors, they are supposed to DIE!

  • I think the main reason for the high energy usage in AMD processors is that they use 65 nm technology, while Intel uses more advnaced 45 nm technology.

    Anyway, I agree with you. Especially with laptops, it's important to have as low power usage as possible to 1) maximize batter life 2) ensure the surface does not get too hot to hold hands on it comfortably 3) lower the space needed for cooling in the machine whose volume is tried to be kept in minimum.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more