Historically the mountain was called Cerro Los Moqujino (Cliff of the Strange writings) by the Native Americans stating it pre-existed the arrival of their ancestors into the area in 1350 AD 1776 Dominguez-Escalante expedition (shiping logs) got and sent back a rubbing of it for translation (unsuccessful), but it has not as yet resurfaced in the Old Church's of Spain's archives.
New King James Version (NKJV) 10 Mercy and truth have met together; Righteousness and peace have kissed. 11 Truth shall spring out of the earth, And righteousness shall look down from heaven.
A revelation for the book of mormon. Tell me, ignoramus, how does this scripture apply to your false religion? LOL
"out of the earth." You guys think your three headed trinitarian anthropomorphic goo jebus came from the ground?
@sergeantrex There's actually a lot of evidence for that. All across the America's are Egyptian designs and mathematics in Native buildings, an example would be the Ohio earth mounds. Also there was a tablet in Ohio with block hebrew and the ten commandments as well, found in a native American tomb back in the 1800's, but was mostly ignored. Then of course there's Nahom which was mentioned in the Book of Mormon in Arabia, and in the 1990's archeologists(non-mormon) found a city with that name...
@sergeantrex ... and it matched the description that was in the Book of Mormon. In the BoM it says they buried a man named Ishmael there because it was a large burial spot, which archeologists uncovered a burial site at this town with the name Nahom actually inscribed in on certain buildings. Also, since it was just discovered within the last couple of decades, that means Joseph Smith, couldn't have known about it.
@sergeantrex Lastly there is some evidence for the natives being Christian(other than the los lunas rock), such as baptismal fonts being foun amongst the aztec and mayan cities, also another tremendous discovery was that of the book popol vuh, which I suggest looking up. Lastly, it is written in the Bible that Christ had other followers not in the Jerusalem area(John 10:16)
I had to search high and low to find ANY information about this rock. Why might that be? Maybe because everyone in physical contact with the thing understands its a fake - what a thought! This is why theists aren't respected and written off as idiots, because you fools believe anything without ANY research (which is the very definition of gullibility and a key property to irreversible stupidity).
@YourBrainOnReligion ~ Research it on 'wikipedia' because it's most definitely *not* fake. I find it interesting that you've researched 'high and low' yet I can type it into a simple search engine and come up with hundreds of results proving it's legitimate (and historical) existence. And you say theists aren't respected and written off as idiots? Haha, please! Don't be a hypocrite!
@SavannahLynn19 Interesting. If I remember correctly, I was searching for Los Lunas Rock and apparently google doesn't have the rock/stone correlation figured out. You are right - when you enter in stone, lots of stuff comes up. However, nothing in the wikipedia article you refer to confirms it's authenticity. Sure, the text is legitimate - but that doesn't make it old. It is almost certainly a fake. Otherwise, it demands we rewrite everything about human history we currently know.
@YourBrainOnReligion ~ I'm not one to talk to about the 'history we currently know' because I actually believe that the history we are *taught* is not our TRUE history. The Bible is not a 'religious' book, but a history book and one that has been altered many times through translation and transliteration in order to hide real truth. Studying the Bible in it's ancient Hebrew form will open up a whole new world to you and yes, cause you to question all the lies we're made to believe in this world.
@SavannahLynn19 Exactly, and if the bible is taught as a HISTORY book then it is inherently making SCIENTIFIC CLAIMS about the history of our planet—CLAIMS THAT CAN BE TESTED. And if every single test EVER has concluded it's inaccurate, what possible rational reason is left to continue to assert it is anything more than a very old fairy tale? Explain this to me???
@YourBrainOnReligion ~ There is a lot of truth behind this quote... 'History is always written by the winners. When two cultures clash, the loser is obliterated and the winner writes the history books ~ books which glorify their own cause and disparage the conquered foe. As Napoleon once said, ‘What is history but a fable agreed upon?’
@SavannahLynn19 There is a gigantic difference between the history of he did this, she said that and humans did this and moved here and there at this time. The difference is physical evidence. It's quite disheartening that something this basic has to be explained to you.
@SavannahLynn19 Uh, are you unaware of what patina is? You know, the natural crystalization process that happens on engravings like this? Well since people go out there and WASH the stone, there is not any evidence of its age. That is the only way one could date the writing. Again, it doesn't mean it's fake, but it doesn't leave any room to build a case either way. That's the entire point here. It's dishonest to assert that this proves ANYTHING other than a level of gullibility—that's it.
Pretty cool, there are many archeological finds like Egyptian hieroglyphics in the USA and fossilized complex devices that indicate that man was able to make evry complex things from the start.
@KCrenshaw09 not only that, but if they were supposedly from siberia, would they have dark skin? In ancient Middle-east and the middle-east today, many have dark skin. The Iroqois Indians even have dark skin and they're in New york... so if science's explanation for the dark skin was because over time they got tanned skin from being in tropical areas such as mexico, then... why do the iroqois have dark skin? last I ckecked, New Yorkers don't tan very well...
could it have been moses tribe during the time the fled from the armys what if god teleported them there to protect them
gunplow 1 day ago
youtube The Oldest Ten Commandments found, for the Real date of the solar eclipse over NM. 100 bc date was over the west coast.
nmRevealedTours 5 months ago
Historically the mountain was called Cerro Los Moqujino (Cliff of the Strange writings) by the Native Americans stating it pre-existed the arrival of their ancestors into the area in 1350 AD 1776 Dominguez-Escalante expedition (shiping logs) got and sent back a rubbing of it for translation (unsuccessful), but it has not as yet resurfaced in the Old Church's of Spain's archives.
nmRevealedTours 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Psalm 85:10-11
New King James Version (NKJV) 10 Mercy and truth have met together; Righteousness and peace have kissed. 11 Truth shall spring out of the earth, And righteousness shall look down from heaven.
A revelation for the book of mormon. Tell me, ignoramus, how does this scripture apply to your false religion? LOL
"out of the earth." You guys think your three headed trinitarian anthropomorphic goo jebus came from the ground?
LDS4Life71 5 months ago
That would be evidence that mormonism is true lol.
sergeantrex 9 months ago
@sergeantrex There's actually a lot of evidence for that. All across the America's are Egyptian designs and mathematics in Native buildings, an example would be the Ohio earth mounds. Also there was a tablet in Ohio with block hebrew and the ten commandments as well, found in a native American tomb back in the 1800's, but was mostly ignored. Then of course there's Nahom which was mentioned in the Book of Mormon in Arabia, and in the 1990's archeologists(non-mormon) found a city with that name...
FighterOfWhatsRight 7 months ago
@sergeantrex ... and it matched the description that was in the Book of Mormon. In the BoM it says they buried a man named Ishmael there because it was a large burial spot, which archeologists uncovered a burial site at this town with the name Nahom actually inscribed in on certain buildings. Also, since it was just discovered within the last couple of decades, that means Joseph Smith, couldn't have known about it.
FighterOfWhatsRight 7 months ago
@sergeantrex Lastly there is some evidence for the natives being Christian(other than the los lunas rock), such as baptismal fonts being foun amongst the aztec and mayan cities, also another tremendous discovery was that of the book popol vuh, which I suggest looking up. Lastly, it is written in the Bible that Christ had other followers not in the Jerusalem area(John 10:16)
FighterOfWhatsRight 7 months ago
thetruthseeker(.)co(.)uk/article(.)asp?ID=78
Read the very small text below the photograph.
I had to search high and low to find ANY information about this rock. Why might that be? Maybe because everyone in physical contact with the thing understands its a fake - what a thought! This is why theists aren't respected and written off as idiots, because you fools believe anything without ANY research (which is the very definition of gullibility and a key property to irreversible stupidity).
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
@YourBrainOnReligion ~ Research it on 'wikipedia' because it's most definitely *not* fake. I find it interesting that you've researched 'high and low' yet I can type it into a simple search engine and come up with hundreds of results proving it's legitimate (and historical) existence. And you say theists aren't respected and written off as idiots? Haha, please! Don't be a hypocrite!
SavannahLynn19 11 months ago
@SavannahLynn19 Interesting. If I remember correctly, I was searching for Los Lunas Rock and apparently google doesn't have the rock/stone correlation figured out. You are right - when you enter in stone, lots of stuff comes up. However, nothing in the wikipedia article you refer to confirms it's authenticity. Sure, the text is legitimate - but that doesn't make it old. It is almost certainly a fake. Otherwise, it demands we rewrite everything about human history we currently know.
YourBrainOnReligion 11 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion ~ I'm not one to talk to about the 'history we currently know' because I actually believe that the history we are *taught* is not our TRUE history. The Bible is not a 'religious' book, but a history book and one that has been altered many times through translation and transliteration in order to hide real truth. Studying the Bible in it's ancient Hebrew form will open up a whole new world to you and yes, cause you to question all the lies we're made to believe in this world.
SavannahLynn19 11 months ago
@SavannahLynn19 Exactly, and if the bible is taught as a HISTORY book then it is inherently making SCIENTIFIC CLAIMS about the history of our planet—CLAIMS THAT CAN BE TESTED. And if every single test EVER has concluded it's inaccurate, what possible rational reason is left to continue to assert it is anything more than a very old fairy tale? Explain this to me???
YourBrainOnReligion 11 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion ~ There is a lot of truth behind this quote... 'History is always written by the winners. When two cultures clash, the loser is obliterated and the winner writes the history books ~ books which glorify their own cause and disparage the conquered foe. As Napoleon once said, ‘What is history but a fable agreed upon?’
SavannahLynn19 11 months ago
@SavannahLynn19 There is a gigantic difference between the history of he did this, she said that and humans did this and moved here and there at this time. The difference is physical evidence. It's quite disheartening that something this basic has to be explained to you.
YourBrainOnReligion 11 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion ~ Oh, you mean physical evidence, as in things such as... this rock!? ;)
SavannahLynn19 11 months ago
@SavannahLynn19 Uh, are you unaware of what patina is? You know, the natural crystalization process that happens on engravings like this? Well since people go out there and WASH the stone, there is not any evidence of its age. That is the only way one could date the writing. Again, it doesn't mean it's fake, but it doesn't leave any room to build a case either way. That's the entire point here. It's dishonest to assert that this proves ANYTHING other than a level of gullibility—that's it.
YourBrainOnReligion 11 months ago
That kinda pre-dates Chris Columbus by a few years.
SounzNice 1 year ago
Thanks for the great info!
ChristiansofAsia 1 year ago
So is this about mormanism ? i am not sure were your going with this -i
axisapex 1 year ago
Pretty cool, there are many archeological finds like Egyptian hieroglyphics in the USA and fossilized complex devices that indicate that man was able to make evry complex things from the start.
Thanks for the info here! :)
NateWardawg 1 year ago
mormanism?
jls0037 1 year ago
Native Americans do kind of have the Hebrew nose.
KCrenshaw09 1 year ago
@KCrenshaw09 not only that, but if they were supposedly from siberia, would they have dark skin? In ancient Middle-east and the middle-east today, many have dark skin. The Iroqois Indians even have dark skin and they're in New york... so if science's explanation for the dark skin was because over time they got tanned skin from being in tropical areas such as mexico, then... why do the iroqois have dark skin? last I ckecked, New Yorkers don't tan very well...
FighterOfWhatsRight 7 months ago
Wow this is awesome!
DRusseII 1 year ago 2
@DRusseII amen!
swabianknot 1 year ago