8 - core MacPro render speed

[hardstyle905]

im sorry but mac sucks

[TheRealSchizm2Solver]

Mein AMD Athlon X4 640 braucht auf Multi 13 Sekunden. Und das mit nur 4 Kernen auf 3GHz

[Hopedotz]

47 Sekunden für einen Bildaufbau?? Wahnsinn!

[barney71777]

Xeon is just a shiny name. They actually suck. Kthx.

[AzKrElTejon]

Hey jeznaver! Can you tell me The resolution of The picture?! To have a real idea of The time!!

[Barry3443]

Wow. I remember leaving my Amiga 4000 overnight to render a single frame with Imagine 3D back in the day.

[simon1234simon]

yea this truly is a working station

[MikeYip3]

OMG................a designer's dream!

[ociel1988]

is this the late 2008 model hapertown or the nehalem

[Trank00007]

before u critises

[Trank00007]

before you criticize know what ur talking bout

[donniecatalano]

@xbox360samsta8: shut your mouth, what the hell r u talking about

[Beardactal]

@xbox360samsta8 "xbox360samsta8" just by looking at your name I can tell you're an ignorant Xbox troll. Please leave the internets.

[xbox360samsta8]

@Beardactal Sorry I shall now leave this internets

[BIGFLOPPYBEEF94]

The CPU history window you have up ... mine displays 16 boxes ... i guess one for each virtual core but only 8 are actually working, on the activity monitor it says im using 1 percent of the computer but 48% is idle so i think 1 of my processing chips has broken and im only getting 4 worth of power ... do you think it should go to the apple store?

[notanoae]

one thing your all forgetting about the i7s...overclocking. Makes them just as powerful as an octocore, if not more so. Great job paying that much money just to lose all that power.

[jeznaver]

@notanoae

Best purchase ever...in 2008. I get paid a lot for the work I do so cost isn't my worry. But the amount of tasks, projects, rendered frames I've gone through isn't comparable than using my old windows P4 1.8Ghz machine, nor I should wait for 2010+ intel's technology to come out. In fact, I'd custom built two i7 Bloomfield machines as a clustered render server. You don't want to see my energy bills when these clusters running 24/7... :D

[hyrael2]

@jeznaver Well cpu dosen't eat as much energy ans an GPU do.

Well i've a c2d E8400 and it take, 30 watts ? My gpu is made to take 150 watts max, but it should not get to that point ( I can't know how many energy it's using )

[evolutionpr]

@hyrael2

uhm...30 watts?

The C2D e8400 consumes 125+.

An easy google search proves that

[hyrael2]

@evolutionpr What, the max voltage limit for E8400 is 65 watts, are you dumb, 125 is for Core 2 quad Q6600

Mine only consumes 30 and CAN prove it.

Oh actually it consumes 18.75 at full load, but it's at stock clock ;)

[jodorowsky00]

mmm NO, the 2008 8 core 2.8 is faster then the i7 quad in turbo its like 1000 points faster in geekbench.

[Mattsana]

@notanoae That's not true since i7s are 8 threaded not 8 cored.

[Site4Animation]

Hey, why don't you render an actual graphic-intensive scene? This scene is nothing.

I'll give you some scenes to render with V-ray... See how "fast" it is then.

I'm not trying to be a dick, but this scene just isn't that good of an example.

[Remoth000]

Its not about how complicated the scene is, its about having one scene that everyone can base the speed of their Processors on. if you make it too complicated, then people with older cpus will be waiting for hours.

[Site4Animation]

My point is... If you have a bad-ass system, and you're putting a demo of it on YouTube... Then show us a more graphic-intensive scene demonstrating it.

That's all I'm saying.

[Remoth000]

yah, I get that. I think its about time for cinebench 11 with a much higher resource intensive scene. Even with Cinebench 10, my i7 does it in 36 seconds, lol. not much of a render....

[FRURMELLL]

@Site4Animation yeah... the scenes are UGLY AS HELL. I actually can't believe that cinebench is actually real.

[chevguy502]

i get 7 seconds all cores and 25 with only one on my i7 mac sucks balls and whatever the screen things are were on too

[Foodfast123]

"Leapard". I am a big fan of "Leapard" too .

[chorinicpker]

you guys can say this all you want. my pc is custom built. quad gpu's 4.2ghz core i7's 12gb of memory. it has more software supprt. and windows 7 beats leapard

[Localdrummerweb]

then go look at windows based movies cause we dont care

[chorinicpker]

mac pussy :p

[Localdrummerweb]

PC Cunt eat my Mac Pussy :p

[chorinicpker]

my pc would destroy your mac. its a known fact. macs cant keep up with windows. my pc is liquid cooled. its got graphics cards that max users cant even dream of. more support. more availible hardware. more programs. then any mac will have. and its cheaper. so ill rape the mac

[Localdrummerweb]

And who gives a fuck..I know I dont care at all..Maybe that comment just makes you feel better about yourself which is great..im glad I could help you lmao

[studio69product]

what do you do on it? nle? 3d? or do u just play games?

[jeznaver]

@studio69product

A lot of 3D work. HD video compositing/editing. Occasionally games, but I'm more of a console.

[chorinicpker]

Just play games. But I have done c++ on it

[er0k09]

up ur mom it does! you f'in turd pc's dont stand a chance

[chorinicpker]

my pc steam rolls any mac..

[caboose1289]

Impressive system but 7 doesn't beat Leopard.

[chorinicpker]

yes it does.

[caboose1289]

Then you've never used Leopard. 7 is just a bad Leopard copy. They aren't comparable.

[captainclayman]

woah hold on a second

i'm a total mac fanboy, and i can say with confidence that windows 7 is fucking awesome.

[caboose1289]

@captainclayman Its better than Vista on some machines I'll give you that, but if you really do use OS X you would know 7 is nowhere near as good or stable as OS X.

[wanageeska]

would the newer mac pro's multithreading make all the procs peak at 100%... here you seem to peak at 50% until it starts with the oversampling at the end...

[chorinicpker]

my core i7 would blow this away

[theharlinator]

Is this after or before the BSOD?

[chorinicpker]

look up results. my core i7 with ht on at 4.5ghz is unstoppable. have fun with ur macs nub.

[theharlinator]

I am having fun with my new SL update that broke your install he he...

But your used to using broke shit LOL!

[chorinicpker]

what u mean?

[theharlinator]

OK... let's do some 24 hour renders and watch that thing fry it's little over-clocked CPU to a crisp he he... I guarantee that once that cooling system gets one little hiccup it's toast... my Mac Pros can stay way cooler than your PC under high stresses. My cooling is engineered to do that by Apple engineers building the system as a whole integrated unit to work under high loads like that. Your OC PC will burn up!

Try it!

OC isn't good for CPU life.

[chorinicpker]

lol. im using a custom water cooling loop. much more effiectient then your pussy mac cooling.i idle at 40c. and laod at 65c. your lil mac is weak as fuck

[zachsilvey]

imac has i7 capability

[chorinicpker]

no it doesnt.

[JustReelFilms]

Well duh! Of course it would be more powerful because of Moores law but what does that make you?

[shniku]

It makes me a nerd.

[radoslawbiernacki]

There is thread migration between cores. You can see that in first case all cores are under stress. This is one of reason that I never buy this OS.

[Sven88abc]

I've also got the Mac Pro 2,8 (8 cores) with 8800GT. I made a video running some benchmark applications (geekbench and cinebench) and i think i got some nice results.

[planefreak3]

is it one 8-core or 2 4-cores

[Sven88abc]

It's two quad cores, so eight cores together. Check it out.

[killallbree]

Dang I want to try this thing with some of the videos I Edited with motion, I've had render times for literally days, but then again It is dualcore.

[sexydanny21awesome]

It be way faster with the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

[Timvanhelsdingen]

Rendering is done by your CPU, not your GPU.

[Thekilldevilhill]

partly true. Nvidia Cuda?

[t205873941]

@Timvanhelsdingen your so fucking right, and this is why this video fail.

For comparesion, i have a AMD 945 3.0GHZ (which is, 4 cores) and 1 HD 5850 PCS+ Powercolor.

and it can render this picture, about, 12 seconds.

[askloglog]

@Timvanhelsdingen unless your using cuda... then the gpu will help out

[drumsrule786]

@Timvanhelsdingen thats not entirely true. depends on the program

[Thevirus1234]

I have Quadro 4600 =P

[Billobob16]

I have 2 Quad Core 3.2 Xeon Processors and used Cinebench 10 and got with 1 core 4mins, and with all 8 cores 40secs. Idk why that it but I guess that's right or something is wrong. lol

[MadeOnAMac365]

What would be great would be if you rendered the same image on an iMac as a comparison of speed.

[bongman4ghz]

mine is way faster doing the single core thread.

[bongman4ghz]

9.5 = 31 seconds.

4200+ @2.6ghz

:)

[MattyH101]

lol i was using a different version, this version takes me 1 minute 10 secs, how 'bout you?

[FatassNinja250]

I have a baseline Mac Pro (Single-quadcored Xeon 2.8ghz) and it gets 11k in Cinebench 10. It renders the image in 30-35 sec with all four cores. I thought I was blown away, but I guess I had a bit farther to go. :D

[djExprice]

MAXON IS TEH AWESOME!

[tipoomaster]

all cores were being used the first run...

[jeznaver]

the screen capture program iShowU was doing its job capturing and encoding in the background, thus it added approx 3 seconds to the render time. It would be fair to use an external camcorder to capture the event instead.

[shaun928]

what was the resolution of the pic what was being rendered?

620x620?

[pucherasss]

Lol noob.

[shaun928]

Another tard on youtube what comments with out knowing anything about the comments/questions being posted.

It's actually a valid question..

User : "lllIIlIIllIIIIlllIII"

Video : "8Core Mac Pro Xeon Vs. Quad Core PC (Benchmark)"

He is rendering a image of Size: 620x620 @ 3:18 in his video with the intel q6600 @ 2.4Ghz.

So what is the size of the image this 8 Core Mac is rendering, as he hasn't shown it?

To keep the Mac 8 core vs PC 4 core debate fair.

[SantaClause49]

Also, PC's have octo core's too, it's called skull trail.

[92JLee]

isnt the pro's motherboard based on a skultrail?

[SantaClause49]

I don't know, apple does some really weird stuff with there hardware, and never has really goo specifics on parts most people don't check out.

[Andys184]

Or it's called FAIL. Just like shitty vista.

[SantaClause49]

Skull trail is excellant. Secondly, how is vista fail?

[StorkPKAeros]

Vista's not fail at all. It's a bandwagon is all. Vista's only slight flaw is the amount of memory used - which if you have the proper amount to begin with it shouldn't be a problem. And I agree - skulltrail is nice.

[SantaClause49]

Actually, it takes around as much as xp, the reason it takes so much is superfetch(look it up), which actually puts good use to your wasted unused ram. It will free up if you actually need the ram it uses. The reason vista came off bad was because as soon as it released, drivers that were created for it were rushed, thus making them unstable and making vista crash. Same story with xp x64.

[ahahn928]

they basically just shined up the interface and gave it this "aero" look. I personally think that its just more annoying and makes you more confused about your OS. If you think about it there are really no innovations that make you more productive. Theres a ton of things that are wrong! You don't hear mac users having problems with their OS do you (and I'm not taking sides). But vista it actually makes you work slower because xp (or leopard) could run faster!

[SantaClause49]

How does a skin change productivity? You have to be retarded too be confused by a fucking skin.

[tipoomaster]

full specs?

[Amdkillsintel]

you have to download cinebench 9.5

[contoursvt]

This is the old one...its version 9.5

[MattyH101]

this takes me 6 minutes, but i have a picture of a bike, were can i get this picture??