Tea with Chris Field on climate change economist.com/video

[dan20man]

Climate change is a massive distraction. I believe that I understand the science of CC and the fragility of ecosystems.

I also understand the supply demand fundamentals of Crude Oil and how Change in price will effect substitutes in the energy and grains sector. So what happens to social fabric when CL gets to 185 as predicted this week by Paul Horsnell or 200-300 as tipped by the former Saudi Oil Minister Yamani. Will we see riots when the west is priced out of the market? BRIC? New wells?

[TylerNull]

Never question UN bureaucrats. They're so very scientific-y

The climate changes, so we must shut down the engines of humanity and surrender what's left of our liberty and earnings to government bureaucrats whose magical powers will be able to control the ambient temperature of Earth to within plus or minus one half of one degree, twenty years from now.

Socialists are a merciless joke against humanity.

[IC1101]

@TylerNull Another conservative retard... educated by FOXXX

[TylerNull]

@IC1101 Tell your mommy to password protect her screen saver.

[IC1101]

@TylerNull Go get a gun Bobby... hordes of Communists and Muslims are at you door!!!

[mrekbass]

@TylerNull

Awwww... poor little tylernullandavoidofintelligenc­e. Sad little boy lost his fascist fear monger Glenn Beck! Where will he go for lies, spin and stupidity? Hahahahahaha!

You know if you sought out a professionals help they are working wonders with those suffering from aspergers syndrome nowdays. You would probably feel much better on medication instead of sitting around in your own piss, typing your mad ramblings into the void! Jackass!!

[TylerNull]

@mrekbass

Your infantilism wasn't much of a rebuttal.

Buck up and try again.

[mrekbass]

NULLnVOID

I fucking love how predictable you are! You ALWAYS use words you don't understand and your responses are nonsensical.

By definition, a "rebuttal" would be my RESPONSE to something you have stated. As I was not responding to something you stated my comments were not a rebuttal, yet you spit the word out because it sounds big and important to you. You do this in nearly every comment you make!

It's as if you're standing in front of a mirror rubbing shit on your own face!

[TylerNull]

@mrekbass

Publicly boasting that your RESPONSEs fail to address the topic, as you just did, is even more impressive than your earlier infantilism.

Warmers are cute, as long as we keep them far removed from any position of gov't authority. And if it weren't for the teachers' labor unions maintaining such a high rate of scientific illiteracy, the citizenry would ensure that. Instead, we have gov't sponsored mystics proselytizing a prophesy of Thermal Armageddon lest they Cap & Tax.

Go figure.

[mrekbass]

@TylerNull

""Publicly boasting that your RESPONSEs fail to address the topic, as you just did, is even more impressive than your earlier infantilism.""

There you go again Null the #1 Troll!

As always, you write some nonsensical blather and attach it to "fail to address the topic" thinking that it sounds intelligent but it is entirely nonsensical.

Please re-write this sentence in a fashion that would make it comprehendible to an adult!

[mrekbass]

@TylerNull

How many times in the last year have you written ""fail to address the topic?""

I'm guessing at least 100!

[mrekbass]

@TylerNull and Void

I used capital letters on the word RESPONSE in hopes that you would clearly focus on the definition of the word rebuttal. Sadly though you wrote some strangely worded sentence about me "publicly boasting" which didn't even happen, and attached your favorite catch phrase... "fail to address the topic."

Please just admit that you don't know the meaning of the word rebuttal. If you do I wont call you on the countless other words that you use incorrectly.

[TylerNull]

@mrekbass

Oops, your rebuttal failed again. Congratulations though, groupie, on recalling that I typically notice! (Baby steps.)

Perhaps if the political frauds of Warmers weren't so glaringly obvious, then they wouldn't have to so thoroughly debase themselves trying to distract from them. Then again, that would require their mental capacity to rise above that of carbon residue, and yet it never does.

This also explains why Warmers are so darned obsessed with carbon residue.

[mrekbass]

@TylerNull the #1 Troll

Yes, Yes, Yes, you used the word correctly. Although with you I know you just toss out the same 20 big words in hopes that they might eventually be correct.

In all seriousness though, how long have you been trolling so aggressively, three or four years now? You must have a very sad life. Aspegers syndrome is a bitch eh!?

""on recalling that I typically notice!"" What is that in reference too? We'll just accept it as one more of your nonsensical comebacks!

[mrekbass]

@TylerNull and VoidifIntelligence

The breach of your pontificating profundity are boundless, yet you fail to grasp the servility of your own apostletizing Remember, the King of Spain fought the King of France yet they were both monarchs! Hmmmm, sounds deep eh!?

Hahahahahahahahaa... LOFL!!

[rickbar123]

Who do you trust ??? This man or the big mouths hired by the Koch brothers.