lol Bill O Reilly's a tool, a double chinned tool who tried to bribe cops into launching a personal attack against his wife' s lover cause his balls probably have a double chin too!
bluegsp, why should we beleive what YOU say? You are clearly an apologist for FOX News and don't give a damn about the truth. Bill O's claim about Malmady were blatant falsehood, period. Get over it!
You don't have to believe me, research it yourself.
You obviously like being lied to by Olbermann because it fits what you want to believe. I always hear you liberals whine about how much conservatives and Foxnews lies, but you cant site an example. I demonstrate what a pathological and calculating liar Kieth Olbermann is and you refuse to believe it. That sir is a mental disorder. It seems to accompany liberalism. You should seek some psychiatric help
What did my last post just say. Don't resort the level of someone like a "jackass." That wasn't just for bluegsp, but for anyone that happened to read it. I'll admit, I think Mr. O' Reilly can be a totally bone-headed idiot, there are times I think Mr. Olbermann is 100% way off base about anything that is currently happening. I at least take everything from what's said and step back to try and get the whole picture without ideological differences. That may be very hard at times with how it goes.
Sure, call Olbermann a liar and never specify what the lies are. But when Olbermann busts O'Reilly as a fraud, he DOES make specific references to support his case. You FOX News fans are pathetic.
He doesn't "bust" O'Reilly, Olbermann lies about bill lying. You are too stupid to check his bogus "facts" talk about pathetic. Thats why UCLA, PEW Research Center and George Mason University all say FoxNews is the most fair and balanced cable news network on television. Get a Clue MORON
One example of an O'Reilly lie: BillO claimed that he had led a highly successful boycott of French products that brought France to its knees. This was a lie. He made up a fake magazine "The Paris Business Review" to support this lie.
When called on it, BillO just lied louder.
Does anyone have even one specific example of an Obermann lie?
Yeah, everytime Olbermann opens his mouth is an example of a lie. When he exploited the troops and their families at Malmedy to try to make a bizzare political smear, real pathetic
Oh, you mean when at least 84 unarmed American servicemen were shot down after the Malmedy battle in December 1944. When Mr. Olbermann called Mr. O' Reilly on it, he actually gave a reliable source from an article by Michael Reynolds in a 2003 issue of "World War II" magazine. Whenever he does a segment on the Obama birther controversy, he points people to a "World Net Daily" article from August 23, 2008 by Drew Zahn. Even "World Net Daily" finds the President's birth certificate legitimate.
You and Keith convienently disregard O'Reilly's correction or "after Malmedy". Its not a "lie" if you correct the record, its called a mistake. He was referring to the Chenogne massacre that happened two weeks after Malmedy and because of Malmedy. O'Rielly was correct in his analogy, Olbermann is a calculated liar that exploited the victims of Malmedy and thier families to try to falsely smear O'Reilly. Never believe Olbermann all he does is lie. Thats why his ratings suck.
And you disregard what Mr. Olbermann said. First, how does smearing Mr. O' Reilly exploit the victims and their families? I want an answer to that one. Secondly, in his interview with Gen. Clark, he said "IN MALMEDY, as you know, U.S. forces captured S.S. forces who had their hands in the air and were unarmed and they shot them down, you know that. That's on the record, been documented." Also, check out gamingeagle19 video about this, he says that both Mr. O' Reilly and Mr. Olbermann are right.
Its called a "mistake" numbnuts. He corrected the record. He was using an analogy to atrosities that happen in war as he was defending the Marines at Haditha against Clark and Murtha and other liberals calling them "Cold Blooded Killers" ( all were aquitted of the haditha incident by the way, so Bill was correct there as well,) Olbermann new O'Reilly just misspoke and dramatised this whole thing to demonise Bill, thats how he exploited the victims and the families of Malmedy.
There is NO need for name-calling in this exchange! I agree with you that it is wrong to call our soldiers "Cold Blooded Killer," the same brave men and women putting their lives on the line so that you and I can even have an argument on YouTube. However, if you kill a civilian, it is still called murder. Last time I checked, murder was a crime, that varies from State to State. Also, is it misspeaking if you just remember the dead of Malmedy on either side to remind us of the horrors of war?
I do not lable our armed forces "murderers" for following the rules of engagement when it is the ensurgents firing on them from the homes of innocent civilians. They acted properly to protect their own lives while engaging the enemy. Thats why they were found innocent. Bill gave them the benifit of the doubt. Murtha and Clark had no problem calling them "Cold Blooded Killers" to score political points. That is what is detestable.
I don't label our armed forces "murderers" either. I said that when you hit a civilian that causes that civilian's death, it's murder. I also said, the the crime of murder varies from State to State. The reason they were found innocent is because they were acting in self-defense to protect their lives. I haven't been over there because I am afraid to get shot, THERE I SAID IT, I have the greatest respect for the brave men and women on the front lines everyday to protect us from harm.
You seem to be tap dancing around an allegation of murder about the Marines in Haditha. It is by no streach of the imagination that the deaths of the civilians in Haditha can be labled murder by the Marines. It was an unfortunate incident that was precepitated by the ensurgance firing on the Marines form civilian houses.
I take it that you understand now how Olbermann is a dispicable liar and what he attempted to do to O'Rielly is the sign of a very disturbed person
First, I hate tap dancing and think it is just stupid. Calling Olbermann a liar for saying that the Americans were slaughtered at Malmedy is also a lie, that is TRUE. When O' Reilly said that after Malmedy, some U.S. troops executed German captures, that is TRUE. Thank you for walking right into a half-truth, that really helps me out. Believe it or not, they were both RIGHT in their reporting of what happened. Oh, I don't find it despicable of Olbermann or O' Reilly, just you for invoking it.;^)
Then you are really a moronic jackass. You have you head so far up your ideological ass you only prove how sick the liberal mind is. Thank you for demonstrating the pure evil that is the American democrat. Fucking shitstain
Again with the name-calling? Keep in mind I don't go off and swear just for the sake of swearing as I can see you do. You provide a point, I provide a point. we both take what Mr. O' Reilly and Mr. Olbermann has said and you call me a "moronic jackass" for stating my opinion about the situation. You are allowed to disagree with me and I can see you didn't quite get what I was even trying to convey. You forget, I am also allowed to disagree with you, it's a two way street. Have a good day, sir.
If you can't see the difference between O'Reilly making a mistake and correcting the record, and Olbermann blatantly lying, then you are most definitley a moronic jackass. I "get" what you are trying to say, you are defending a lying slanderous twisted ideolog that has no sense of decency because you happen to agree his with liberal view of the world. You are willing to accept this lies and character assasination because you don't like the guy he is going after. Pathetic looser
I get that you will cling to Mr. O' Reilly for whatever reason even if he is wrong, just like you claim I will cling to Mr. Olbermann even when he is wrong. I'm I right so far? Keep in mind I have been the one that has been the calm one, while just quoting your name-calling towards me in a feeble attempt to dress me down. It's not going to work I'm afraid. I don't accept everything Olbermann says so easily, I like the President and apparently so does Mr. O'Reilly. Read this weekend's Parade Mag!
No, you have completely missed it. (not surprisingly considering your limited intellectual capibilities.) I "cling" to the truth, which I seldom hear from the left. I could care less about Bill O'Reilly but he was not wrong. Olbermann is a deliberate liar and you have no problem with that which speaks volumes about you character (or lack there of)
Your affection for Obama is irrelevant to the conversation, but hardly surprising
I think my more colorful language was a response to dalehusband and another poster who were offensive in thier posts. I usually gage my post by how aggressive the other person I am talking to is.
So, basically if you come across someone being a "jackass" you think it is OK to be a "jackass"? I don't think SO! If you ever in your life happen to meet someone that is just spewing crap from their mouth, that doesn't mean you have too either. Be the bigger person in the argument. Do NOT resort to their level.
Keep in mind that O'Reilly used the "Malmedy" incident as an breif example of atrocities. The massacre at Chenogne was done out of revenge for Malmedy. The marines at Haditha were accused of taking "revenge" for the death of a fellow squad member moments before by a roadside IED. As it turns out, that was not the case, but Bill's exchange with Clark happened before thier trial, so Bill had no way of knowing that. Olbermann knew what he was doing with this 8 min diatribe
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Obsessed with Fox News. He is a pussy. The type to be kneeling in front of a grave he was made to dig for himself, hands tied behind his back wondering "what happened?".
When someone does something stupid, some accept it, some believe it, and some call it for what it is, stupid.
Olberman calls it stupid when it's stupid. Nothing wrong with that. When Bill O, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, George W Bush, etc. says something stupid, Olberman makes note "hey, that was stupid".
No, I am saying that O'Reilly tells the truth, you don't have to agree with his opinion, he allways has guest on that don't agree with him. Olbermann always lies and never has anyone on that disagrees with him. Olbermann is a lying coward and his ratings show it
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
sounds to me like Olberman is obsessed with O'Reilly. Thats all he talks about everyday. He says he wants to be original. His show is the same shit every damn day!
Oh I really doubt that, O'Reilly is a pretentious bastard, who spouts his twisted message of what he calls truth and justice; but it really is a sermon of ignorance, slander, and bigotry.
Much of Relliys idiotic claims is easily verifiable as being utter crap by anybody whit the sleightest abillity in goggelfu, so try and learn it (US soldiers massacre of German soldiers at Malmardy is only one of them)
Olbermann is an Ivy League grad and was probaly one of the best and most clever Sports Broadcasters EVER on Sports Center. His own ego got him in trouble with ESPN. Oreilly was hosting inside edition for christ sakes before dipshit Murdock hires him on FOX. Oreilly is so ignorant, ne doesn't even know he's ignorant.
o'reilley fans think "ratings" make right. Ratings have nothing to do with quality or substance. I watch O'reilly BECAUSE he's a cunt and a clown and I skip olberman because he is a decent guy that I will agree with anyway. Olberman's show is MEANT to be boring because they don't make up complete shocking sheit.
Gotta luv Keith. He's a straight shooter who delights in exposing the hypocrisy of these Neo-con Nazi retards. What amazes me is how these self-rightist right-wingers who idolize these blowhards turned out to be such thin-skinned wimps. They grow balls by listening to these tough talking hypocrites, and then whine like baby's when Keith dares to expose the truth.
To all liberals, WGA supporters, and other A-Holes in general, I apologize I have not gotten back to your hater comments sooner and that I have to use this generic response, you see I was on vacation. __________(place your user name here) you suck and I hope you get ass cancer & die. (Again, I apologize for any incovienience you may have suffered and will get back to you with personalized insults as soon as I get caught up).
Yea Yea ..the 'liberal' media strikes again. You goon, where isthis liberal media any way. Didnt seem them at the run up to the war, or covering Valerie Plame(the woman that was tracking down material perfect for dirty bombs) And i guess your just forgetting that rupert murdock admitted he fixed his new to support bush. Shut the fuck up..sit the fuck down.
That's because if you have 100 viewers and grow to 20 that is a large percentage whereas if you have a large viewer base increases appear smaller as a percentage. Your a doofus.
hahahahaa... and your cute when your being an ass. A simple google search proves that he has been having a sharp climb in numbers and has been besting many of foxes shows. Yes bill-o still has his millions of sheep ...but so what. bush got reelected so we already know how stupid the general public as been. TIMES ARE CHANGING!! If you get in the way...we will not even notice the bump.
whiteakerj, VetorDie is correct, based on percentages, particularly for demographic group coveted by cable, ages 19-54. Now if you have 100 viewers and "grow" to 20, that would be going backwards, wouldn't it? "Your"(sic) a doofus.
Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist
By Meg Sullivan|
While the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal is conservative, the newspaper's news pages are liberal, even more liberal than The New York Times. The Drudge Report may have a right-wing reputation, but it leans left. Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media. Meanwhile, almost all major media outlets tilt to the left.
These are just a few of the surprising findings from a UCLA-led study, which is believed to be the first successful attempt at objectively quantifying bias in a range of media outlets and ranking them accordingly.
"I suspected that many media outlets would tilt to the left because surveys have shown that reporters tend to vote more Democrat than Republican," said Tim Groseclose, a UCLA political scientist and the study's lead author. "But I was surprised at just how pronounced the distinctions are."
"Overall, the major media outlets are quite moderate compared to members of Congress, but even so, there is a quantifiable and significant bias in that nearly all of them lean to the left," said co‑author Jeffrey Milyo, University of Missouri economist and public policy scholar.
I used to respect Kieth, a lot. I hate the Bush administration, and all the corrupt unconstitutional things they have done. I lost all respect when he called the Republican presidential candidates "warmongers", which four of them are, but deliberately ignored Ron Paul, because he is against the war.
He'd never know that because he can't even handle having people with an opposing view on his show. Say what you want about O'Reilly, but at least he has people on his show who disagree with him.
Poking Bill O'Reilly in the eye? His whole shtick is O'Reilly. He's a parasite. His show is unwatchable. And before I'm denounced as a right-wing, stupid, sheep, bush-lover etc. Let me say that I'm not. He's not funny and his show sucks.
Olbermann is the most biased partisan on TV. NBC anchor Brian Williams was so disgusted by Olbermann's biased comment/question to him, after the State of the Union Address on 1/28/08 on MSNBC, it was impossible for Williams not to smirk. Williams looked so pained to have to tolerate Olbermann it was clear how little he respects Olbermann. Williams ignored Olbermann and presented a fair assessment of President Bush's Performance. Olbermann discredits his entire TV network.
camshaff, hey thanks for reading Brian Williams' mind for us. You do not seem to understand that Keith gives opinions; that's his job. He's no more partisan than say, Hannity, who has actually worked fundraisers for Rudy. I'm sure that bothers you too...By the way we're in a recession and endless war; it's hard to spin that for the good.
Olbermann's supporters reflect his methods of distorting the truth to put America in the worst light possible. We have been in the best economy in the history of man, the war on terrorism has prevented any further attacks on U.S. soil, and I do not watch Hannity. Keith's commentary is not my issue; my issue is when he pretends to be a news reporter and starts his biased reports with statements like, "President Benedict Arnold" referring to our Commander in Chief in times of war. Disgusting.
Housing foreclosures are percentage-wise at the highest they've been in what,30 years? Economic stimulus desperately needed, as evidenced by stimulus package offered by Bush. Wall Street panicking.Great economy. If you want to give "war on terrorism" credit for no further attacks then give Bush the blame for 9/11 occurring on his watch; neither point is supportable.
Olberman is your classic lib. Give him a microphone and he'll spew enough class & gender warfare nonsense to really make a fool of himself. I'm no O'Reilly apologist, but at least O'Reilly makes sense about 10% of the time. Olberman just needs to attach his show to someone more popular than him to keep putting food on the table....
Something tells me your not the brightest bulb in the package. You shouldn't mistake arguments that are too hard for you to understand with "class & gender warfare nonsense"
No one truthfully answers a question by starting with the word "Honestly". Furthermore, the guy has a Man Crush on Bill and it shows on every single show. Otherwise, why is he defending himself.
Hey, Keith, why do you IGNORE RON PAUL? Maybe because you can only wave your finger madly at the "war-mongering Republicans"? Maybe because Ron Paul does not fit into the mold of the Republican bogeyman you have built your career jeering at.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You're an effeminate coward lashing out at the United State's noble President. You would pee your panties if democrats had their way and President Bush hadn't protected you from Al Qaeda. Grow a set of balls shitball.
camshaff: Why the offensive language? Does that make the little boy feel all grown up tough like a real man? Maybe you should pick up a gun and go kill some bad guys for your hero -- "Wrong Way Bush". Not to worry -- "don't ask/don't tell" is still in force.
keith really is a nerd. i find it hard to watch his diatribes even when i agree with him. he is a fake watch dog. he hates ron paul and tries to smear him with pc crap. bottomline he works for GE who is the worlds biggest war machine.
You should watch him with bill moyers (i think?) He explains how working for GE has put him in a unique position - in that his bosses cant say what he's saying, but can enable HIM to say it. Also he bemoans the nature of corporations in that some will even allow the slogging of their name through the mud if it earns them revenue through another venue.
Then why don't you talk about Ron Paul if you don't care about your shows success and want a responsible president?Why do you keep on saying that there aren't any republicans that stand up against Bush's policies? jackass.
Because he is an internationlist who believes in open borders and a nanny-state. He is against what Paul stands for on almost everything. I am suspicious that if a Democrat was in office Olbermann wouldn't mind as much that we are in the Middle East and would downplay the loss of civil liberties. Most of th talking heads are like this.
I've heard him talk, he rails against the tactics of this administration, the usurpation of civil liberties and he rails against a do-nothing congress (a democratic one, mind you) that does nothing to reinstate blood-won rights and liberties.
If a democrat is in office and does nothing to change it, they would be the greater criminal, for having the mandate to remove executive power and privilege, and utilizing it instead.
Just because someone does not agree with everything Ron Paul espouses does not make him anti-Paul. I think Paul is great, but I disagree with much of what he wants. Still, I'd not mind him as president - how do you deal with MY shade of gray? Or can you not?
I wouldn't mind if Olbermann just disagreed with Paul and spoke out against Paul's ideas, but instead of that, Olbermann ignores Paul, and recently, he made a blanket statement about "the Republican candidates," calling them warmongers, as if Paul wasn't a Republican.
Thinking about it later, I give Olbermann more benefit of the doubt, because he's just going along with the rest of the media and only caring about "the frontrunners," but it's still frustrating.
even thought i dont like olbermann i like how he doesnt like bill o'reilly more though lol. even if hes phony i like seeing bill get put in his place.
Olbermann's ego is obsessed with being top dog in the cable new industry. Bill O'Reilly is the only one standing in his way which is why we have the nightly rips and smears that have been done to death. His overly dramatic diatribes don't hide the fact that he is still a far-left media guy obsessed with anything negative about the current admin. Keith, have at least a little objectivity. Maybe for just a minute or two.
I repeat, Olbermann is the single most biased partisan pretending to be a news journalist. Yes Hannity is just as bad, but he is counter balanced with a liberal and he is presented as a conservative. A news journalist should objectively report the news as accurately as he/she can. Olbermann began a news broadcast calling George Bush "President Benedict Arnold". Disgusting bias. Even if you are reporting on Bin Ladin, a journalist has to be objecteve to be credible.
Camshaft, the fairness doctrine was killed by RR, opening the door for Rush, Hannity, and Savage to present their view only. If you think AC "balances" Hannity, then you are missing most of Hannity's work,on the radio, without AC. Everyone has a take, and my guess is you don't agree with Keith's. As far as I know, no one has sued him for not being factual and he has admitted when he got something wrong. It is a news/opinion show, get it?
Olbermann is a partisan hack. He doesn't really give a damn about Bush or his policies, just about insulting Republicans whenever he can. Prime example: he indicted the Republicans at the Florida debate for their "unanimous" support of the Iraq war; then he cycled through each one to prove his point, OMITTING Ron Paul entirely. Whether you like Ron Paul or not, he is definitely anti-war, so for Olbermann to lump RP in with the other four is a bald-faced lie.
He speaks truth to power. He REALLY supports the soldiers and is a patriot. How wouldn't anyone not expose Bush and Fox News for the damage they have done to America? The right-wingers are like a cult they support Bush and Fox they are simply driven by their hate of others. They could care less what happens to the troops or their country as long as people are attacked that they HATE
hughster41 My God you right wingers are so damn blind. Where did he lie? I know of one time where he aired a segment before certain things happened at Fox so he is called a liar? You people are so pathetic. Go finish watchng your Fox News propaganda.
KO lied in this segment. In this very clip. He said that BO said that there are not 200k homeless vets. That is NOT what BO said; it just sounds more inflamatory, so KO repeats it over and over.
Actually, what O'Reilly says is that it's more like 150K and that they're not homeless because of economic reasons but because of addiction and mental illness. Does that make it ok? And the idea that economics isn't a factor is ludicrous.
"Actually", the dispute started when Edwards said there were 200K living under bridges. BO said there were not 200K living under bridges. KO then said that BO said there were not 200K homeless vets. That's how it started, and that's how KO keeps repeating it (apparently a fan of the "repeat a big lie often enough and people will believe it" premise).
I used to like this guy until I found out he works for the Democrats exclusively ,I mean if your so worried about the country wouldn't you back Ron Paul on the other side of the isle ?
mabusmojo66 , you arrack Keith with LIES because he doesn't support the Ron Paul cult. My God you nuts need to wake the hell up! I am worried about the country and there is no way in hell I'd back Ron Paul! And that is very clear for milliins of other Americans!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
beware boys and girls...KO's "chosen-ness" keeps him from telling the full truth. Example: Benazir Bhutto, an Oxford grad and international figure, told the world something very interesting on Nov 2nd; "Omar Sheikh, the man sho murdered O$AMA B1N L4DEN!" Bhutto, rest her soul, lived only 55 days after her revelation -- but did Keith bother doing any sort of journalism regarding Bhutto's claim regarding public enemy #1??? What did he ever tell America??
Or maybe your assumption that all military individuals are conservative is not only ludicrous, but highly insulting to the intelligent men and women of uniform who form variety of opinions instead of either/or politicking.
So you like that bill-o thinks we have no homeless vets? Or is it that you like the way he back peddled on the subject and then made some statement on how 'there is nothing the government can do about mental illness.' Really ...what do you like?
eddiehaskell7, please keep weighing in with your great name calling commentary. We are all writing down every word! How much do you LIKE Bill O.? Do you love him or would like to?
You're a patriot. I've alwasy wondered why " Conseratives" present themselves as the true patriot. During our "just" wars (WW2) there was semocratice leaderhip ( Roosevelt and Truman)
Dat'a boy Keith. Please continue punching bill'o in the mouth every time he opens it full of lies. And yes!! It is important to us that someone sets the record straight. Google: publicintegrity
To ignore Bill O is to ignore the demise of responsible broadcasting. Keith O should "obsess" over him and every other broadcaster who presents a point-of-view without facts, without fairness and without an iota of common sense.
lol Bill O Reilly's a tool, a double chinned tool who tried to bribe cops into launching a personal attack against his wife' s lover cause his balls probably have a double chin too!
rhodium1233 3 months ago
Olbermann is a liberal faggot
WillMio 2 years ago
bluegsp, why should we beleive what YOU say? You are clearly an apologist for FOX News and don't give a damn about the truth. Bill O's claim about Malmady were blatant falsehood, period. Get over it!
DaleHusband 2 years ago
You don't have to believe me, research it yourself.
You obviously like being lied to by Olbermann because it fits what you want to believe. I always hear you liberals whine about how much conservatives and Foxnews lies, but you cant site an example. I demonstrate what a pathological and calculating liar Kieth Olbermann is and you refuse to believe it. That sir is a mental disorder. It seems to accompany liberalism. You should seek some psychiatric help
bluegsp 2 years ago
What did my last post just say. Don't resort the level of someone like a "jackass." That wasn't just for bluegsp, but for anyone that happened to read it. I'll admit, I think Mr. O' Reilly can be a totally bone-headed idiot, there are times I think Mr. Olbermann is 100% way off base about anything that is currently happening. I at least take everything from what's said and step back to try and get the whole picture without ideological differences. That may be very hard at times with how it goes.
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
Keith is smart and funny, bill is just a bully and a crybaby!!
daddydon48 2 years ago
Sure, call Olbermann a liar and never specify what the lies are. But when Olbermann busts O'Reilly as a fraud, he DOES make specific references to support his case. You FOX News fans are pathetic.
DaleHusband 2 years ago
He doesn't "bust" O'Reilly, Olbermann lies about bill lying. You are too stupid to check his bogus "facts" talk about pathetic. Thats why UCLA, PEW Research Center and George Mason University all say FoxNews is the most fair and balanced cable news network on television. Get a Clue MORON
bluegsp 2 years ago
One example of an O'Reilly lie: BillO claimed that he had led a highly successful boycott of French products that brought France to its knees. This was a lie. He made up a fake magazine "The Paris Business Review" to support this lie.
When called on it, BillO just lied louder.
Does anyone have even one specific example of an Obermann lie?
Even one?
modernecon 2 years ago
Yeah, everytime Olbermann opens his mouth is an example of a lie. When he exploited the troops and their families at Malmedy to try to make a bizzare political smear, real pathetic
bluegsp 2 years ago
Oh, you mean when at least 84 unarmed American servicemen were shot down after the Malmedy battle in December 1944. When Mr. Olbermann called Mr. O' Reilly on it, he actually gave a reliable source from an article by Michael Reynolds in a 2003 issue of "World War II" magazine. Whenever he does a segment on the Obama birther controversy, he points people to a "World Net Daily" article from August 23, 2008 by Drew Zahn. Even "World Net Daily" finds the President's birth certificate legitimate.
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
You and Keith convienently disregard O'Reilly's correction or "after Malmedy". Its not a "lie" if you correct the record, its called a mistake. He was referring to the Chenogne massacre that happened two weeks after Malmedy and because of Malmedy. O'Rielly was correct in his analogy, Olbermann is a calculated liar that exploited the victims of Malmedy and thier families to try to falsely smear O'Reilly. Never believe Olbermann all he does is lie. Thats why his ratings suck.
bluegsp 2 years ago
And you disregard what Mr. Olbermann said. First, how does smearing Mr. O' Reilly exploit the victims and their families? I want an answer to that one. Secondly, in his interview with Gen. Clark, he said "IN MALMEDY, as you know, U.S. forces captured S.S. forces who had their hands in the air and were unarmed and they shot them down, you know that. That's on the record, been documented." Also, check out gamingeagle19 video about this, he says that both Mr. O' Reilly and Mr. Olbermann are right.
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
Its called a "mistake" numbnuts. He corrected the record. He was using an analogy to atrosities that happen in war as he was defending the Marines at Haditha against Clark and Murtha and other liberals calling them "Cold Blooded Killers" ( all were aquitted of the haditha incident by the way, so Bill was correct there as well,) Olbermann new O'Reilly just misspoke and dramatised this whole thing to demonise Bill, thats how he exploited the victims and the families of Malmedy.
bluegsp 2 years ago
There is NO need for name-calling in this exchange! I agree with you that it is wrong to call our soldiers "Cold Blooded Killer," the same brave men and women putting their lives on the line so that you and I can even have an argument on YouTube. However, if you kill a civilian, it is still called murder. Last time I checked, murder was a crime, that varies from State to State. Also, is it misspeaking if you just remember the dead of Malmedy on either side to remind us of the horrors of war?
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
I do not lable our armed forces "murderers" for following the rules of engagement when it is the ensurgents firing on them from the homes of innocent civilians. They acted properly to protect their own lives while engaging the enemy. Thats why they were found innocent. Bill gave them the benifit of the doubt. Murtha and Clark had no problem calling them "Cold Blooded Killers" to score political points. That is what is detestable.
bluegsp 2 years ago
I don't label our armed forces "murderers" either. I said that when you hit a civilian that causes that civilian's death, it's murder. I also said, the the crime of murder varies from State to State. The reason they were found innocent is because they were acting in self-defense to protect their lives. I haven't been over there because I am afraid to get shot, THERE I SAID IT, I have the greatest respect for the brave men and women on the front lines everyday to protect us from harm.
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
You seem to be tap dancing around an allegation of murder about the Marines in Haditha. It is by no streach of the imagination that the deaths of the civilians in Haditha can be labled murder by the Marines. It was an unfortunate incident that was precepitated by the ensurgance firing on the Marines form civilian houses.
I take it that you understand now how Olbermann is a dispicable liar and what he attempted to do to O'Rielly is the sign of a very disturbed person
bluegsp 2 years ago
First, I hate tap dancing and think it is just stupid. Calling Olbermann a liar for saying that the Americans were slaughtered at Malmedy is also a lie, that is TRUE. When O' Reilly said that after Malmedy, some U.S. troops executed German captures, that is TRUE. Thank you for walking right into a half-truth, that really helps me out. Believe it or not, they were both RIGHT in their reporting of what happened. Oh, I don't find it despicable of Olbermann or O' Reilly, just you for invoking it.;^)
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
Then you are really a moronic jackass. You have you head so far up your ideological ass you only prove how sick the liberal mind is. Thank you for demonstrating the pure evil that is the American democrat. Fucking shitstain
bluegsp 2 years ago
Again with the name-calling? Keep in mind I don't go off and swear just for the sake of swearing as I can see you do. You provide a point, I provide a point. we both take what Mr. O' Reilly and Mr. Olbermann has said and you call me a "moronic jackass" for stating my opinion about the situation. You are allowed to disagree with me and I can see you didn't quite get what I was even trying to convey. You forget, I am also allowed to disagree with you, it's a two way street. Have a good day, sir.
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
If you can't see the difference between O'Reilly making a mistake and correcting the record, and Olbermann blatantly lying, then you are most definitley a moronic jackass. I "get" what you are trying to say, you are defending a lying slanderous twisted ideolog that has no sense of decency because you happen to agree his with liberal view of the world. You are willing to accept this lies and character assasination because you don't like the guy he is going after. Pathetic looser
bluegsp 2 years ago
I get that you will cling to Mr. O' Reilly for whatever reason even if he is wrong, just like you claim I will cling to Mr. Olbermann even when he is wrong. I'm I right so far? Keep in mind I have been the one that has been the calm one, while just quoting your name-calling towards me in a feeble attempt to dress me down. It's not going to work I'm afraid. I don't accept everything Olbermann says so easily, I like the President and apparently so does Mr. O'Reilly. Read this weekend's Parade Mag!
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
No, you have completely missed it. (not surprisingly considering your limited intellectual capibilities.) I "cling" to the truth, which I seldom hear from the left. I could care less about Bill O'Reilly but he was not wrong. Olbermann is a deliberate liar and you have no problem with that which speaks volumes about you character (or lack there of)
Your affection for Obama is irrelevant to the conversation, but hardly surprising
bluegsp 2 years ago
I think my more colorful language was a response to dalehusband and another poster who were offensive in thier posts. I usually gage my post by how aggressive the other person I am talking to is.
bluegsp 2 years ago
So, basically if you come across someone being a "jackass" you think it is OK to be a "jackass"? I don't think SO! If you ever in your life happen to meet someone that is just spewing crap from their mouth, that doesn't mean you have too either. Be the bigger person in the argument. Do NOT resort to their level.
JoshKeatonFan 2 years ago
Keep in mind that O'Reilly used the "Malmedy" incident as an breif example of atrocities. The massacre at Chenogne was done out of revenge for Malmedy. The marines at Haditha were accused of taking "revenge" for the death of a fellow squad member moments before by a roadside IED. As it turns out, that was not the case, but Bill's exchange with Clark happened before thier trial, so Bill had no way of knowing that. Olbermann knew what he was doing with this 8 min diatribe
bluegsp 2 years ago
Olbermanns lies have been very good for Kieth Olbermann. Liberals know that they are lies and don't care. What an ideology
bluegsp 2 years ago
tool
snowshoehill 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Obsessed with Fox News. He is a pussy. The type to be kneeling in front of a grave he was made to dig for himself, hands tied behind his back wondering "what happened?".
MikeLatoris 3 years ago
When someone does something stupid, some accept it, some believe it, and some call it for what it is, stupid.
Olberman calls it stupid when it's stupid. Nothing wrong with that. When Bill O, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, George W Bush, etc. says something stupid, Olberman makes note "hey, that was stupid".
MagnesDrachen13 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Olbermann is offensive.
Dontgupt208 3 years ago
Olbermann kicks O'Reilly ass every night with facts instead of lies and O'Reilly need to stop cheating on his wife.
mightyblack1 3 years ago 20
doesn't olbermann ever cheat on his boyfriend
truthtone58 2 years ago
Truthtone58,I guess when he's not fucking your mother.
mightyblack1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Olbermann never tells the truth. Olbermann lies when he calls O'Rielly a liar. Olbermann is one pathetic miserable excuse for a human being
bluegsp 2 years ago
So your boy O'Rielly is a saint right,not on this earth.
mightyblack1 2 years ago
No, I am saying that O'Reilly tells the truth, you don't have to agree with his opinion, he allways has guest on that don't agree with him. Olbermann always lies and never has anyone on that disagrees with him. Olbermann is a lying coward and his ratings show it
bluegsp 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sounds to me like Olberman is obsessed with O'Reilly. Thats all he talks about everyday. He says he wants to be original. His show is the same shit every damn day!
bomb0s 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Broadcasting success????? Is he kidding? What are his ratings again? The only thing that keeps him on TV is his war with O'Reily.
sexycarln 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow this guy is a moron and its sad he is obsessed with o reilly
jaystus 3 years ago
Hey, Olbermann's main hobby is baiting Bill O'Reilly. Given that Bill lies literally constantly, I say have at it!
Raven1x 3 years ago 13
He always has a good answer to everything.
jakem11 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"church lady" Olbermann is left of Castro
shakenotstired 3 years ago
Said by a typical GOP who have absolutely no idea what *leftie* really means.
Gabriella292u 3 years ago
fox news and that O' guy are just shit.
black0ston 3 years ago
here how it goes eihter you choose hate or love war or peace, lies or truth, Oreilly or Olbermann
ENJOYOURMATRIXX 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Plain and simple, Olbermann is jealous of O'Reilly.
MikeyR630 4 years ago
Well....no....
he hates O'Reilly.
pacificguitarist 4 years ago
O'REILLY DOESN'T CARE HAHA
Laxtreme8 4 years ago
Oh I really doubt that, O'Reilly is a pretentious bastard, who spouts his twisted message of what he calls truth and justice; but it really is a sermon of ignorance, slander, and bigotry.
satchelluc 4 years ago 9
please don't act like u watched him or did any unbiased research haha come on
Laxtreme8 3 years ago
Much of Relliys idiotic claims is easily verifiable as being utter crap by anybody whit the sleightest abillity in goggelfu, so try and learn it (US soldiers massacre of German soldiers at Malmardy is only one of them)
Gabriella292u 3 years ago 5
Ya, then Tucker Carlson has a shitty toupe.
MikeyR630 3 years ago
Olbermann is an Ivy League grad and was probaly one of the best and most clever Sports Broadcasters EVER on Sports Center. His own ego got him in trouble with ESPN. Oreilly was hosting inside edition for christ sakes before dipshit Murdock hires him on FOX. Oreilly is so ignorant, ne doesn't even know he's ignorant.
pooptalkerlive 3 years ago 3
Wow CNN is a bunch of dirty bastards.
HeyYouNotYou 4 years ago
douchebag
dabears1143 4 years ago
o'reilley fans think "ratings" make right. Ratings have nothing to do with quality or substance. I watch O'reilly BECAUSE he's a cunt and a clown and I skip olberman because he is a decent guy that I will agree with anyway. Olberman's show is MEANT to be boring because they don't make up complete shocking sheit.
internaut101 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Olbermann is a moron.
ECDHollis 4 years ago
oh really? why is that.
pacificguitarist 4 years ago
Bill O > Kieth anyday,
just look at the ratings
MapleMeadows 4 years ago
Ratings don't make a person right.
grazon 4 years ago
Totally irrelevant and desperately hoping someone will notice him
occamselectricrazor 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Olbermann is weak. A punk.
eddiehaskell7 4 years ago
Gotta luv Keith. He's a straight shooter who delights in exposing the hypocrisy of these Neo-con Nazi retards. What amazes me is how these self-rightist right-wingers who idolize these blowhards turned out to be such thin-skinned wimps. They grow balls by listening to these tough talking hypocrites, and then whine like baby's when Keith dares to expose the truth.
fpm229 4 years ago
To all liberals, WGA supporters, and other A-Holes in general, I apologize I have not gotten back to your hater comments sooner and that I have to use this generic response, you see I was on vacation. __________(place your user name here) you suck and I hope you get ass cancer & die. (Again, I apologize for any incovienience you may have suffered and will get back to you with personalized insults as soon as I get caught up).
camshaff 4 years ago
Glad to see another civilized person from the right. Congratulations on proving your idiocy. Publicly.
redlion145 4 years ago
save it for the cross-burning adolf
vivwritten 4 years ago
INDEED ?!!? t'mon idole.
tommyturnquest 4 years ago
Keith's name is heard by more viewers on the Factor than is own show. I pity Keith because he has no imagination...
jamamcd 4 years ago
there is no liberal media in the u.s., only extreme right and few in the center. Read what the res of the world is saying.
zeromina 4 years ago
Thank you - keep up the honesty and exposing these spin doctors.. well that's what their called now..but our parents would call the LIERS..
Peace
ou8one2forme 4 years ago
Keith's show gets terrible ratings. It kind of shows you that America isn't as far to the left as the media would have you believe.
whitakerj 4 years ago
Yea Yea ..the 'liberal' media strikes again. You goon, where isthis liberal media any way. Didnt seem them at the run up to the war, or covering Valerie Plame(the woman that was tracking down material perfect for dirty bombs) And i guess your just forgetting that rupert murdock admitted he fixed his new to support bush. Shut the fuck up..sit the fuck down.
VetOrDie 4 years ago
whitakerj you are "RIGHT ON". Don't fret over VetOrDie, obviously just another sissy liberal throwing a hissy fit.
camshaff 4 years ago
PS... Keith's ratings are growing faster then any other right now.. google it.
VetOrDie 4 years ago
That's because if you have 100 viewers and grow to 20 that is a large percentage whereas if you have a large viewer base increases appear smaller as a percentage. Your a doofus.
whitakerj 4 years ago
hahahahaa... and your cute when your being an ass. A simple google search proves that he has been having a sharp climb in numbers and has been besting many of foxes shows. Yes bill-o still has his millions of sheep ...but so what. bush got reelected so we already know how stupid the general public as been. TIMES ARE CHANGING!! If you get in the way...we will not even notice the bump.
VetOrDie 4 years ago 2
whiteakerj, VetorDie is correct, based on percentages, particularly for demographic group coveted by cable, ages 19-54. Now if you have 100 viewers and "grow" to 20, that would be going backwards, wouldn't it? "Your"(sic) a doofus.
drmark1995 4 years ago
a piece from UCLA Journalism:
Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist
By Meg Sullivan|
While the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal is conservative, the newspaper's news pages are liberal, even more liberal than The New York Times. The Drudge Report may have a right-wing reputation, but it leans left. Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media. Meanwhile, almost all major media outlets tilt to the left.
whitakerj 4 years ago
These are just a few of the surprising findings from a UCLA-led study, which is believed to be the first successful attempt at objectively quantifying bias in a range of media outlets and ranking them accordingly.
whitakerj 4 years ago
"I suspected that many media outlets would tilt to the left because surveys have shown that reporters tend to vote more Democrat than Republican," said Tim Groseclose, a UCLA political scientist and the study's lead author. "But I was surprised at just how pronounced the distinctions are."
whitakerj 4 years ago
"Overall, the major media outlets are quite moderate compared to members of Congress, but even so, there is a quantifiable and significant bias in that nearly all of them lean to the left," said co‑author Jeffrey Milyo, University of Missouri economist and public policy scholar.
whitakerj 4 years ago
VetorDie couldn't finish his comment without using offensive language; A true Olbermann fan he is:)
Grow up and debate like a real man!
jamamcd 4 years ago
I used to respect Kieth, a lot. I hate the Bush administration, and all the corrupt unconstitutional things they have done. I lost all respect when he called the Republican presidential candidates "warmongers", which four of them are, but deliberately ignored Ron Paul, because he is against the war.
seapoidog 4 years ago
He'd never know that because he can't even handle having people with an opposing view on his show. Say what you want about O'Reilly, but at least he has people on his show who disagree with him.
seans10 4 years ago
Poking Bill O'Reilly in the eye? His whole shtick is O'Reilly. He's a parasite. His show is unwatchable. And before I'm denounced as a right-wing, stupid, sheep, bush-lover etc. Let me say that I'm not. He's not funny and his show sucks.
seans10 4 years ago
Olbermann is the most biased partisan on TV. NBC anchor Brian Williams was so disgusted by Olbermann's biased comment/question to him, after the State of the Union Address on 1/28/08 on MSNBC, it was impossible for Williams not to smirk. Williams looked so pained to have to tolerate Olbermann it was clear how little he respects Olbermann. Williams ignored Olbermann and presented a fair assessment of President Bush's Performance. Olbermann discredits his entire TV network.
camshaff 4 years ago 2
camshaff, hey thanks for reading Brian Williams' mind for us. You do not seem to understand that Keith gives opinions; that's his job. He's no more partisan than say, Hannity, who has actually worked fundraisers for Rudy. I'm sure that bothers you too...By the way we're in a recession and endless war; it's hard to spin that for the good.
drmark1995 4 years ago
Olbermann's supporters reflect his methods of distorting the truth to put America in the worst light possible. We have been in the best economy in the history of man, the war on terrorism has prevented any further attacks on U.S. soil, and I do not watch Hannity. Keith's commentary is not my issue; my issue is when he pretends to be a news reporter and starts his biased reports with statements like, "President Benedict Arnold" referring to our Commander in Chief in times of war. Disgusting.
camshaff 4 years ago
Housing foreclosures are percentage-wise at the highest they've been in what,30 years? Economic stimulus desperately needed, as evidenced by stimulus package offered by Bush. Wall Street panicking.Great economy. If you want to give "war on terrorism" credit for no further attacks then give Bush the blame for 9/11 occurring on his watch; neither point is supportable.
drmark1995 4 years ago
Throw your tv out if you haven't already done so. All these clowns hate America.
J1Goro 4 years ago
Olberman is the creepiest person on television! I suspect the vast majority of people who follow him still live in their mother's basement.
camshaff 4 years ago
Olberman is your classic lib. Give him a microphone and he'll spew enough class & gender warfare nonsense to really make a fool of himself. I'm no O'Reilly apologist, but at least O'Reilly makes sense about 10% of the time. Olberman just needs to attach his show to someone more popular than him to keep putting food on the table....
onlybygracedoistand 4 years ago
You think money is more important than people
bnk384 4 years ago
Something tells me your not the brightest bulb in the package. You shouldn't mistake arguments that are too hard for you to understand with "class & gender warfare nonsense"
DjDialogic 4 years ago
Are you idiots falling for this? They all are propagandists, not journalists. WAKE UP!!!
PlzPeopleWakeUp 4 years ago 3
No one truthfully answers a question by starting with the word "Honestly". Furthermore, the guy has a Man Crush on Bill and it shows on every single show. Otherwise, why is he defending himself.
aclusux 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Keith Olbermann needs to wise up o'reilly always has facts to back his stories unlike Keith.
clickandsee 4 years ago
You mean like when O'Reilley was talking about American troops shooting unarmed Germans at Malmedy?
getplaning 4 years ago 2
Hey, Keith, why do you IGNORE RON PAUL? Maybe because you can only wave your finger madly at the "war-mongering Republicans"? Maybe because Ron Paul does not fit into the mold of the Republican bogeyman you have built your career jeering at.
seapoidog 4 years ago 2
Don't forget to watch the "State of the Union" address tonight. Words I wanna hear: "I shall resign the presidency at noon tomorrow"...
fpm229 4 years ago 7
Too bad for you it won't happen.
calyman 4 years ago
Too bad for the world it won't happen.
fpm229 4 years ago 4
You mean too bad for us. Anyway, at least there are only months left to go.
Matty2Tone 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're an effeminate coward lashing out at the United State's noble President. You would pee your panties if democrats had their way and President Bush hadn't protected you from Al Qaeda. Grow a set of balls shitball.
camshaff 4 years ago
lol, look ma a bushbot
expectopatrono 4 years ago 2
camshaff: Why the offensive language? Does that make the little boy feel all grown up tough like a real man? Maybe you should pick up a gun and go kill some bad guys for your hero -- "Wrong Way Bush". Not to worry -- "don't ask/don't tell" is still in force.
fpm229 4 years ago
NO, NO! President CHENEY? Are you mad? Mr. "the bombing will commence in 5 minutes"?
THINK before you speak, child!
fairalways 4 years ago
keith really is a nerd. i find it hard to watch his diatribes even when i agree with him. he is a fake watch dog. he hates ron paul and tries to smear him with pc crap. bottomline he works for GE who is the worlds biggest war machine.
DennyMclain2008 4 years ago
You should watch him with bill moyers (i think?) He explains how working for GE has put him in a unique position - in that his bosses cant say what he's saying, but can enable HIM to say it. Also he bemoans the nature of corporations in that some will even allow the slogging of their name through the mud if it earns them revenue through another venue.
For better or worse, Keith's right.
-Qes
QuasiEvilScott 4 years ago
Then why don't you talk about Ron Paul if you don't care about your shows success and want a responsible president?Why do you keep on saying that there aren't any republicans that stand up against Bush's policies? jackass.
sollycardy98 4 years ago
Because he is an internationlist who believes in open borders and a nanny-state. He is against what Paul stands for on almost everything. I am suspicious that if a Democrat was in office Olbermann wouldn't mind as much that we are in the Middle East and would downplay the loss of civil liberties. Most of th talking heads are like this.
otto1882 4 years ago
Based on what? Your fear?
I've heard him talk, he rails against the tactics of this administration, the usurpation of civil liberties and he rails against a do-nothing congress (a democratic one, mind you) that does nothing to reinstate blood-won rights and liberties.
If a democrat is in office and does nothing to change it, they would be the greater criminal, for having the mandate to remove executive power and privilege, and utilizing it instead.
(cont.)
QuasiEvilScott 4 years ago
(cont.)
Just because someone does not agree with everything Ron Paul espouses does not make him anti-Paul. I think Paul is great, but I disagree with much of what he wants. Still, I'd not mind him as president - how do you deal with MY shade of gray? Or can you not?
-Qes
QuasiEvilScott 4 years ago 2
I wouldn't mind if Olbermann just disagreed with Paul and spoke out against Paul's ideas, but instead of that, Olbermann ignores Paul, and recently, he made a blanket statement about "the Republican candidates," calling them warmongers, as if Paul wasn't a Republican.
Thinking about it later, I give Olbermann more benefit of the doubt, because he's just going along with the rest of the media and only caring about "the frontrunners," but it's still frustrating.
filaminstrel 4 years ago
even thought i dont like olbermann i like how he doesnt like bill o'reilly more though lol. even if hes phony i like seeing bill get put in his place.
tekkenjam 4 years ago
It was funny watching him deny that he does it for ratings.
Steinman991 4 years ago
Making fun of Billo is like shooting fish in a barrel.He gives fuel for the fire every time he opens his mouth.
upconstruct 4 years ago
Olbermann's ego is obsessed with being top dog in the cable new industry. Bill O'Reilly is the only one standing in his way which is why we have the nightly rips and smears that have been done to death. His overly dramatic diatribes don't hide the fact that he is still a far-left media guy obsessed with anything negative about the current admin. Keith, have at least a little objectivity. Maybe for just a minute or two.
mikeusmc72 4 years ago
No, he is obsessed with exposing O'Reilly. More peol eoppose him that Jon Stewart because his approach is not humorous.
jmrleroy 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my videos
joshfif 4 years ago
Olbermann is obsessed with O'Reilly? I'm shocked.
JWeichman 4 years ago
Queif found his niche appealing to the far-left moonbats of the Democrat Party. He's laughing all the way to the bank.
patsagainstrats 4 years ago
I repeat, Olbermann is the single most biased partisan pretending to be a news journalist. Yes Hannity is just as bad, but he is counter balanced with a liberal and he is presented as a conservative. A news journalist should objectively report the news as accurately as he/she can. Olbermann began a news broadcast calling George Bush "President Benedict Arnold". Disgusting bias. Even if you are reporting on Bin Ladin, a journalist has to be objecteve to be credible.
camshaff 4 years ago
Camshaft, the fairness doctrine was killed by RR, opening the door for Rush, Hannity, and Savage to present their view only. If you think AC "balances" Hannity, then you are missing most of Hannity's work,on the radio, without AC. Everyone has a take, and my guess is you don't agree with Keith's. As far as I know, no one has sued him for not being factual and he has admitted when he got something wrong. It is a news/opinion show, get it?
drmark1995 4 years ago
Olbermann's reporting is as accurate as it gets.
It's just that, as you may have heard before, reality has a liberal bias. So blame reality, not Keith.
MarquisdeBarrabas 4 years ago 7
Olbermann is a partisan hack. He doesn't really give a damn about Bush or his policies, just about insulting Republicans whenever he can. Prime example: he indicted the Republicans at the Florida debate for their "unanimous" support of the Iraq war; then he cycled through each one to prove his point, OMITTING Ron Paul entirely. Whether you like Ron Paul or not, he is definitely anti-war, so for Olbermann to lump RP in with the other four is a bald-faced lie.
For the record: Fuck O'Reilly too.
filaminstrel 4 years ago
Olbermann is the lone liberal voice in the vast MEdia wasteland of state and corp. news.
eelzen 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Keith's show gets terrible ratings. It kind of shows you that America isn't as far to the left as the media would have you believe.
whitakerj 4 years ago
He speaks truth to power. He REALLY supports the soldiers and is a patriot. How wouldn't anyone not expose Bush and Fox News for the damage they have done to America? The right-wingers are like a cult they support Bush and Fox they are simply driven by their hate of others. They could care less what happens to the troops or their country as long as people are attacked that they HATE
UTBESUX 4 years ago 4
hughster41 My God you right wingers are so damn blind. Where did he lie? I know of one time where he aired a segment before certain things happened at Fox so he is called a liar? You people are so pathetic. Go finish watchng your Fox News propaganda.
UTBESUX 4 years ago 2
utbesux:
KO lied in this segment. In this very clip. He said that BO said that there are not 200k homeless vets. That is NOT what BO said; it just sounds more inflamatory, so KO repeats it over and over.
InvestigatorDave 4 years ago
Actually, what O'Reilly says is that it's more like 150K and that they're not homeless because of economic reasons but because of addiction and mental illness. Does that make it ok? And the idea that economics isn't a factor is ludicrous.
CitizenWorm 4 years ago
"Actually", the dispute started when Edwards said there were 200K living under bridges. BO said there were not 200K living under bridges. KO then said that BO said there were not 200K homeless vets. That's how it started, and that's how KO keeps repeating it (apparently a fan of the "repeat a big lie often enough and people will believe it" premise).
InvestigatorDave 4 years ago
I used to like this guy until I found out he works for the Democrats exclusively ,I mean if your so worried about the country wouldn't you back Ron Paul on the other side of the isle ?
mabusmojo66 4 years ago
mabusmojo66 , you arrack Keith with LIES because he doesn't support the Ron Paul cult. My God you nuts need to wake the hell up! I am worried about the country and there is no way in hell I'd back Ron Paul! And that is very clear for milliins of other Americans!
UTBESUX 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nigger
nigrettee 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
beware boys and girls...KO's "chosen-ness" keeps him from telling the full truth. Example: Benazir Bhutto, an Oxford grad and international figure, told the world something very interesting on Nov 2nd; "Omar Sheikh, the man sho murdered O$AMA B1N L4DEN!" Bhutto, rest her soul, lived only 55 days after her revelation -- but did Keith bother doing any sort of journalism regarding Bhutto's claim regarding public enemy #1??? What did he ever tell America??
TruthJockey 4 years ago
Food for thought.
jmrleroy 4 years ago
A champion of civil liberties and a man who has the balz to speak truth to power. Thanks Keith. Long may you and Countdown run.
duhCider 4 years ago 8
Kurtz says "We can check the details another time" But that's whole point KRUTZ, Check the details, ya know, for FACTS!
MonsterSound 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Olbermann seems like the kind of guy a US Marine would love to get his hands on.
A real punk.
eddiehaskell7 4 years ago
i'm a marine who loves his show
YazDawg 4 years ago 20
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are a Marine and I'm Elvis.
eddiehaskell7 4 years ago
Or maybe your assumption that all military individuals are conservative is not only ludicrous, but highly insulting to the intelligent men and women of uniform who form variety of opinions instead of either/or politicking.
-Qes
QuasiEvilScott 4 years ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ok......forget the Marines. I'd like to kick Olbermann's punk ass.
eddiehaskell7 4 years ago
To each their own eddiehaskell7. Just be aware that if you were successful - there'd be a line to kick yours.
-Qes
QuasiEvilScott 4 years ago 2
And i'm a 12 year soldier/vet who loves his show.
I'd rather have my hands around Billy O's neck.
nathanlahue 4 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I like Bill O. Olbermann is a punk.
eddiehaskell7 4 years ago
So you like that bill-o thinks we have no homeless vets? Or is it that you like the way he back peddled on the subject and then made some statement on how 'there is nothing the government can do about mental illness.' Really ...what do you like?
VetOrDie 4 years ago 2
eddiehaskell7, please keep weighing in with your great name calling commentary. We are all writing down every word! How much do you LIKE Bill O.? Do you love him or would like to?
drmark1995 4 years ago
You're a patriot. I've alwasy wondered why " Conseratives" present themselves as the true patriot. During our "just" wars (WW2) there was semocratice leaderhip ( Roosevelt and Truman)
jmrleroy 4 years ago
Dat'a boy Keith. Please continue punching bill'o in the mouth every time he opens it full of lies. And yes!! It is important to us that someone sets the record straight. Google: publicintegrity
VetOrDie 4 years ago 8
Not 1 mention ever of Ron Pauls message on Olbermanns show ,Ron Paul mentioned 4 times his message mentioned 0 times.
WolverineInk 4 years ago 5
To ignore Bill O is to ignore the demise of responsible broadcasting. Keith O should "obsess" over him and every other broadcaster who presents a point-of-view without facts, without fairness and without an iota of common sense.
agandia 4 years ago 3
Kurtz is a Republican tool, like so many in the mainstream corporate media. Thank you, Keith for being there for us.
integral 4 years ago 3