Added: 4 years ago
From: militaryvideo
Views: 153,140
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (601)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • America rulz

  • *спецназ

  • @spacitydrummer4JC the seal wouldn't see these guys. The first thing the срецназ learns are counter sniper methods. Even if he could line up a shot, he'd be dead before he got a round off.

  • All this is fine and dandy, but I doubt it'll do any good when the guy is dead from the bullet of a SEAL sniper lying down 2,000 yards away.

  • wether or not they're the best is argueable, what isnt argueable though is that they can & will kick your ass

  • this basic training course is the same as seals hell week! (jk im 12 years old)

  • danger , lots of idiots below this comment arguing about thing they are not even related to

  • @08richard8 Really? Are you Army Ranger? WIll you tell us about your military excperiance? How do they differ?

  • @realIBeliX Im no ranger, but i've seen how hard they train! And I also have friends in service! The US Army Rangers are the BEST light infantry fighting force in the WORLD!

  • @08richard8 Really? Which counteur, which fort?

  • @08richard8 fuck off

  • @realIBeliX just ignor 08richard8 he dont know anything about tanks his an idiot

  • @joseft30 It is just funny how he doesnt even have 1 argument why Abrams is better, he just says that it is better than T-90 without any reason which can prove.

    Overall I could bash him also about Soviet-Afghan war and many other bullshit he said why he was wrong, anyway, he wont have any good argument anyway. That troll is not interesting anyway.

  • Come on, don't be stupid. Americans are respectable, it's not their fault the Union ended(otherwise, Spetsnaz would be the undisputed greatest special forces).

  • This ownzzzz

  • I'd have to say I respect all Special Operations from all sorts of countries and think each have a unique training that makes them good at what they are trained to do. No hating on any country :)

  • i just noticed this is basic. thats why I LOVE foireign armies they go hard even in basic traning

  • If i was to choose navy seals vs Spetsnaz i would pick Spetsnaz the reason of their accurate guns like the ak74u ak74 ak47 and they never get jammed. Their ballistic knife and your messing with a worlds biggest country their weaponry never jam SPETSNAZ!!!!!!!!!!!1

  • @DJkasparov13 fuck you

  • basic? i wan't my mommy and happy meal...

  • the thing is the russian spetsnaz is actual the weakest spec ops in the world so imagine the shit the others do

  • @xXTheAnoyingCatXx I agree, russians are weak-ass! ;)

  • @08richard8 And you base your opinion on what exactly? Because looking at Russia's military history even someone with IQ of room temperature would not be dumb enough to say or agree with another moron that thinks Russian's are weak-ass. Given the historical meters that from 50s-80s many capitalized on Americas fear of the Soviets. I can see something like that comming from a 10 or 12 year old who doesn't know batter but come on Rich you're 26.

  • they use drugs to make them stronger. they make the USA look like shit

  • @linkscols fuck you

  • thats only some of the hardcore shit

  • they only show the baby stuff to what they realy do You have to kill a wild dog with nothing but a spade you must lay down in a pile of ants to withstand pain and make you mentaly stronger and you must fight one another until someones nearly dead!

  • Kick-ass Russians!

  • On video Russian use AK-74.

  • These guys make the American armed forces look like some kids playing army men

  • @Showercookies667, Are you kidding? I am in the American armed forces and everything in that video was sloppy or worthless. I really see a need to repel face first towards the ground. And the part where they rushed the room to detain the guy, They all just ran in there was no tactical movement at all. I favorite part was the guy playing with the bo. I really see a need for a long stick on todays battle field.

  • @versavisa1 Becuase american armed forces are sooo brilliant right, they definitely don't just run around in Afghanistan shooting hills and claiming kills.

  • @versavisa1 Yeah, man! I completely agree with you ;)

    RESPECT TO YOU!

    GOD BLESS AMERICA! ;)

  • Comment removed

  • @Showercookies667 Ok, you maggot eating brat! The American Military destroyed the Soviet forces in Afghanistan (unofficialy, of course) Russia's military budget is 50 billion,

    America's yearly military budget is 500 billion!!! You should see how the US Army Rangers train, then, maybe you can keep talking your trash! Fucking loser!

  • @08richard8 Wow Rich I read your comments & keep doubting your age, considering your intelligence level.

    OK. First off I'm not going to bash on USA because I still have friends in service. That said Before you even start comparing budgets you should first think our military costs $500 billion a year & we are at $14 Trillion of national debt almost equal with our GDP which is BS as well & $77 trillion obligating debt. Now look at Russian standings & ask how many would fights for free?

  • @08richard8 theres no pointing fighting each other..both USa and Russia need to come together to face the oncoming danger of China

  • @peterpetersbng Ur right ;)

    I would really like Russia to become our ally, but we're too different. We can never be real allies :(

    And China really isnt that much of threat to either russia or USA. They only have 500 military aircraft and only bout 40 ships in their navy :O!! Their infantry is not issued with body armor! Chinese army is large, but unskilled and untrained!

  • @08richard8 With all Respect Rich.. i beg to differ....China has to be seen as a threat... in this modern world unfortunately you cannot take anything for granted .. History has taught us this lesson.... i really respect your answer but when i look at your age. i feel you will change your opinions as you mature....( not that your not mature now ) i hope you understand and respect that point of view,,, because it has a lot of sense to it..governments have to prioritize China No 1

  • @peterpetersbng I believe im fully mature :( ...

    Anyway, Im not saying that China is not a threat, but I think too many people are overestimating it... I respect your opinion and point of view, China is definately a threat but NATO can tackle it... after all, nobody can beat technology, and NATO has the best technology...

  • @08richard8 haha you've just prove that america only depends on its equipment but they cant kick ass and they are overweight and scared hahahahaha

  • @joseft30 Lol, OVERWEIGHT?? :P

    U dont know shit kid, go back to studying!

  • @08richard8 you dont know anything about military right hahahahahaha are you familiar with the balikatan americans cant go in the front lines with us because your equipment is too heavy and you cant drink tap water because you will get diarrhea and your APC's are big your guns are heavy and they always jam and you cant teach us combat tactics its not how hi-tech your equipment its how can you trust your equipment

  • @joseft30 How about we look at the facts?

    -During the ''American Expeditionary Force Siberia" and the "Polar Bear Expedition" during WWI, US and British troops were sent to Russia to aid the Stranded Czechoslovak Legion in eastern Russia... The US Soldiers took 189 casualties, mostly from the "Spanish Flu" and only a few of them died in combat... US Forces cut their way through many Russian soldiers and successfully rescued the Czechoslovak Legion...

    Thats a fact!

  • @joseft30 And later, during the Cold War...

    Insurgents tried to overthrow the Afghan government, so they went crying to the Russians for help... USSR took Afghanistan quickly... This pisses the US off so much, that CIA whips out Operation Cyclone, to arm and train the Mujahideen... I cant see how the Mujahideen could kick Russia's red ass out of Afghanistan, so I guess US Forces were "Unofficially" sent there to help... Anyway, after they got kicked out, the USSR collapsed.. HAHA AMERICAN WINS!

  • @08richard8 Well Afghanistan is known as the "Graveyard of empires".

  • @08richard8 no us is crying on their humvees you forgot that gay!!!AND RUSSIA CAN AND WAS (REMEMBER GEORGIA)AND WILL KICK YOU GAY PATHETIC ASS IDIOT JEALOUS YANKI HAHAHA!!!RUSSIA WINS-F A T A L I T Y!!! PUSSY

  • @luka2298 Ok... First of all, you need to learn how to write and speak in English, beacuse I didn't get any of what you said, kid :P

    Anyway, Russia is not a Super Power any more... The USSR broke down... You lost in Afghanistan, WE WON THE COLD WAR... So shut the fuck up and go back to STUDYING, kid!!!

  • @08richard8 You stupid -.- The russians were lossing money on something worthless and they were lossing the Chechens plus the americans are getting Kill by The tailban which the CIA help to fight

  • @joseft30 Your BTR's are much heavier than our Stryker ICVs, the BTRs handle like school buses! HAAH!

    Our M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tanks are much better than your T-90s and our AH-64 Apache are better than your fucking MI-28 (NATO codename: Havok) and KA-50 Alligator! (You can check the specifications if you dont believe me :P) The AK-107 which the Russian army uses is a LOT heavier than the M4s and M16s the US Military uses, even though your caliber 5.45 is lighter than the 5.56mm the M4 uses :)

  • @08richard8 whats with vietnam war 58.220 dead but soviet casualty in afghan-soviet war is 14.453 and korean war you lost 36,516 men and soviet union lost 282 and the issued rifle of russian army is AK-74M not ak-107 and abrams uses only the american 120mm compared to 125mm with ATGM that means we can kick ass and pls i m not a russian nor a ukrainian or any soviet people i m a american and half filipino and you suck i know more about military and i m just 13 years old hahahaha

  • @joseft30 We lost 58220 men in Vietman, but NVA (North Vietnam Army) lost 10 times more!

    In Korea, the soviet union lost 282 men out of the 300 men they sent there! The M1A1 Abrams has a better armor and engine than the T-90 which means we are faster! Also the 5mm difference is irellevant in real combat! SO GO BACK TO STUDYING KID!!!!

  • @joseft30 The T-90 is nothing more than an upgraded T-72, renamed after the mauling the T-72 received in Desert Storm. It is wholly inferior to the Abrams in armor protection, firepower, electronics, and speed/acceleration.

    ^^THATS A FACT^^ TO BE EXACT!

  • @08richard8 and it can be easy destroyed by machine gun fire T-90 has SPU under the main armor come on lets just admit we are not the best interms of military but in business and politics we are the best i love the russians but i love america my country

  • @joseft30 the T-90 is not meant to fight tanks like the Abrams, it would be suicide.

    The T-90 is meant to be a bullet stopper, that is, its meant to be used in large numbers to overcome a superior enemy. Its armor is built to withstand common weapons, but the US arms its troops with extremely good weapons that would make easy work of a T-90.

    The gun on the T-90 is the same as that on the T-72, which we know cannot destroy an Abrams.

  • @08richard8 T-72 is made for M60 patton ang T-90 is lighter and they refuse to test the frontal armor against modern projectiles during the testing the T-90's frontal armor have been with the most advance anti tank projectiles of the cumulative like armor piercing discarding sabot which are equally efficient to the best projectiles for abrams 120mm gun from 200mm the tank was hit 6 times after that it moved it self for examination point

  • @joseft30 The T-90 is nothing more than an upgraded T-72, renamed after the mauling the 72 received in Desert Storm. It is wholly inferior to the Abrams (and the Leo, Challenger, Merkava) in armor protection, firepower, electronics, and speed/acceleration!

    In the Gulf War, Abrams tanks survived multiple hits at relatively close ranges from Iraqi Lion of Babylon tanks and ATGMs. M829A1 "Silver Bullet" APFSDS rounds from other M1A1 Abrams were unable to penetrate the front and side armor!

  • @08richard8 M1A2 reactor is in rear which was discovered in Iraq, even simpliest RPGs disabled it, and rear armor can be damaged by HMGs. Also M1 is made from Uranium. T-90 is protected by electro defensive countermeasures "Shtora", which M1 doesnt have similar, meaning, that T-90's ATGM missle will take M1 down. T-90 hull is protected behind main armor. T-90 is made from Wolfram (strongest elementh in world). T-90 was tested by being shot by modern tank shells multiple times, like M1A2 uses. ..

  • @08richard8 plus at end, it was shot by Bor missle, no damage to armour, only inner electronics were damaged.

    M1 main cannon is 120mm and is protected by two HMGs.

    T-90 main cannon is 125mm, same as M1, it is capable fitting 42 shells. T-90 is protected only by 1 HMG, but T-90 has range controlable missles and ATGM system installed. M1 maximal speed is 50-60km/h. Maximum distance that can be drived is 410km.

    T-90 maximal speed is 50-70km/h...

  • @08richard8 there was tank demonstrations. Tanks had to drive around rough terrain, jungle marsh, T-90S was only tank able to complete, M1 track got ripped and wasnt able to move.

    Also T is more compact, lighter, shorter in lenght and height, and is able to basiclly be called "Flying tank".

  • @realIBeliX T-90 is nothing more than a re-branded T-80, which is very similar to the T-72, so it's an old and ineffective design.. The M1 is known for having problems in rough terrain, but the M1A1 and M1A2 variants (today, there are only M1A2s in service) have been upgraded and the problem has been solved!

  • @08richard8 I just sent you 3 replies of comparsion of M1 and T-90. Did yo uread them?

  • @realIBeliX I didn't get anything, wise guy! But see this:

    -The armor of the M1A2 is known to be able to survive multiple hits from other M1A2s at VERY SHORT RANGE!

    -The M1A2 has the BEST electronics and radar systems, along with the best Anti-Missile System around!

    -The M1A2 can reach higher speeds than your T-90!

    -The M1A2s AP shells are more powerful than the T-90s.

    -The ammunition of the T-90 is under the turret, so if it is pierced, the whole tank turns into a fireball!

    Who's better now?

  • @08richard8 M1 is able to survive older shells and never was shot by modern tank shells, for example like T-90 and CH2.Who said M1A2 has best electronics? Look Nizhny Tagil's T-90MS demonstration, it has best electronics now in world. Where did you see that M1A2 can reach higher speed? I already told you, in Abu-Dhabi, M1A2 took high speed on marshy lands and it crashed.

    M1A2 AP shells are more powerful? Were did yo uget this bullshit, M1 can barely can get armed with AP.

    Stop making up bullcrap

  • @realIBeliX Lol, you kid :P Yes, you are talking about the OLD M1 TANK! The new M1A2 has ALL OF THE ISSUES FIXED AND UPGRADED ELECTRONICS!!! IT CAN SURVIVE MULTIPLE HITS FROM YOUR SHITTY T-90! THE M1A2 COSTS $6.2 million! The T-90 COSTS $3.2! The fact that the M1A2 is more expensive speaks for itself! And our tank have some of the Best trained crews out there!

    Face it, WE ARE BETTER!

  • @08richard8 KId, watch who yo ucall kid before using lol and using caps locks.

    No, I know what I was talking about, I clearly said M1A2 few times so your brain can understand that I am not talking about M1A1.

    As I say again, prove that M1A2 can survive multiple hits? I participated in Abu-Dhabi, and I saw with my own eyes how M1A2 so called terrain track leveling best electronics were demolished.

    So if it is expensive? So was F-22 which got cancelled and produced so many.

    Start thinking.

  • @08richard8 and without repairs its side was putted under fire of the most modern grenade launchers results are same the armor is not pierce only side protection screens are damaged during iraq war abrams could be pierce by RPG-7 even with projectiles of older version also the weak spot of the abrams was discovered the secondary power unit of the tank which provides all electronic systems when the main engine is shut down

  • @joseft30 You are talking about the M1 Abrams, which is no longer in service! The M1A2 is the ONLY tank in service now, and it has been upgraded and all the issues were fixed!

    How's that

  • @08richard8 not at all the marines dont have m1a2's and the t-90's armor is better lets just admit it we are not more talented than the russians and what took so long hahahahahaha 13 yrs old vs. 26 yrs old your owned dude fuck off

  • @joseft30 Jeez, I didn't understand anything from that... Would you say it one more time?

  • @08richard8 its gun is 120 mm cannon and can fier guided missiles and new generation rounds, and its not a cheap tank either

  • @08richard8 mabe yes but mi 24 is much better than apache and the AK is much better than the M16 or M4!

  • Comment removed

  • @joseft30 So.. GO FUCK YOURSELF, KID!!!! HAHAHA

  • @Showercookies667 both russia and the us army adopt similar princepals of war tactics. They both share information to better each nation. We are allies comrad

  • @Showercookies667 you clearly dont know what army rangers or delta force is do you?

  • @Showercookies667- we ahve the best in the world

  • @Showercookies667 Fuck off kid! Go bak to studying! America is Number 1!

  • @Showercookies667 make them look??? the americans are already kids playing with army men

  • @Showercookies667 These guys make CoD black ops look like a 1970 atari.

  • Whats The name of this song?

  • seriously, the ak-47 is out dated. even russia thinks so. they did replace it.

  • @jdflick20

    gimme a break dude im from sunny California and I know that no unit in the us military can whoop Russia ass in a fight with out tech.

  • @JonnyBoy241 I find your lack of faith disturbing.

  • @soukupb

    sorry but I find that the U.S isn't is as great or as powerful and that's why so many countries talk shit and don't take us serious anymore.and the military isn't as strong as it once was and has gone way too soft on training and keeping troops disciplined like the Russian army does.

  • @JonnyBoy241 In the US army the drill seargent just raises his voice and he gets carded...

  • @soukupb Our government and our very way of life is failing right now because todays youth can name all the cast of Jersey Shore... But the can't name any of their fucking state senators...

  • @rachfordtd i cant name either, jersy shore is gay shit

  • why the fuck are u people comparing marines to spetnaz? marines would get their shits rapped. Now Green Berrets are the ones who u dont fuck with. spetnaz would get shitted on

  • @ArnorvTheMilky Apart from the French Foreign Legion, the Spanish Legion and maybe some of the Serbian Red Berets and SAJ, noone is better then Spetsnaz

  • I'm not a big "guns-knower", but aren't they using the AK47?

    If they are - why? it seems like a pretty old gun to be using

  • @Skidern its a newer variant that they use. the AK they don't really use anymore except for training because they're cheap and arming militia because theres lots of them.

  • @Skidern

    the AK-47 may be old but to this day it is the best weapon in world and is the most reliable gun.

  • @JonnyBoy241 not anymore, weapons like the H&K 416, ACR, and SCAR assault rifles are replacing the ak in reliability.  though the acr is still in training phases its still more reliable. only reason armies still use it is because they are too poor to afford anything else. and thats actually a fact.

  • @Skidern It's Avtomat Kalashnikov (Modernised), AKM.

    It's preferred by some special purpose troops, because it is damn reliable, works everywhere (winter (-40 C easily) summer, coast, mountains (even tho in mountain air there is almost no oxygen) et cetera) and it has ammunition with balls 7.62 Russian (that shit tears targets apart, if so is wanted), very viable option taking in all of the factors.

  • @lassimikael I'm pretty sure 7.62r doesnt stand for "russian" isnt stand for rimmed?

  • @ibilliedyourmomhard I didn't say 7.62r, I said Russian standard, thats the marketing name for them (AK and RK fitting 7.62) here.

  • @lassimikael Ohhhh sorry I got confused.

  • @Skidern AK-74 and AK-74N and AKM

  • @Skidern Russian forces and Spetsnaz use AK47 only in training, because AK47 is easy, dont need to take care much of it, so recruits learn basics of AK, they dont use AK47 since 60's, it got replaced by AKM (modernized version of AK47), later they repalced it with AK74 and in 90's with AK74M (modernized AK74), now they are producing AK100 series and newest AK so far is now AK200. Parallely Russians have other assault rifles liek Groza, AN94 and AEK941. WHich are tested by Spetsnaz.

  • they only thing russians are good at is fighting :D

    Spetsnaz is great, there traning 2.

  • @jdflick20 Really, they aren't. Russia has never lost a war ( except the cold war maybe hehe ), I really wouldn't want to piss those guys off.

  • @jdflick20 stupid training???? you must not know how much of a concrete art that systema is. Their training makes their bodies cancel out pain. First off I love the usa (even if our government blows).The VIetcong and the taliban have given us many many problems. We struggled in the wars in the later years. WW2, Vietnam, Korea and now in the middle east. The russians only had problems with the muhad ja Diem. The army, and the marines cant win but the seals vs spetnaz, thats a good match up

  • @TheApacheHawk013 dont the marines train the navy

  • @blakTiGGeRXXX there is a difference between the navy and the navy SEALS. I have a 2nd cousin who was a marine for 10 years and I asked him when I was real young "can anyone beat you up" and he replied, "yep, my buddies at the navy seals".

  • @TheApacheHawk013 good point but it also depends on the individual cuz i kno dude who is in the airforce who beat 20 army soldiers

    i mean u might be right im jus all for the marines when it comes to the service lol

  • @blakTiGGeRXXX I agree with you. The marines are the most respected and prideful of the service. I am no commie but doing systma spetnaz training and learning their way of the battlefield, I find them to be challenging for anyone. "we respect everyone.......we can kill them with respect to" -Sonny Puzkiles

  • @TheApacheHawk013 yea i do agree i wouldnt mess wit a marine or spetnaz or seal

    i mean if the sake of humanity was threatened by some force then these men would be the ones to look up to

    n yea i saw that episode of deadliest warrior lol

  • @jdflick20 if you think the russian spetsnaz are just tough and not well trained you should probably sterilze youself so that you can no longer reproduce.

  • @jdflick20 the spetnaz undergo training so harsh that its is illegal for the US to train their millitary like the Spetnaz do.

  • @jdflick20 The navy seals can come close, but not close enough....I'm an American but the Russians beat us there, but not as far as overall manpower goes. We outnumber em by alot thankfully.

  • @mtinch7 by population sure but Russia has a lead of 200-400t thousand more soldiers thatn the US sad for the US but true.

  • heres just another redneck speaking of how incredebly strong his country is

    MESSAGE TO AMERICA YOURE NOT ALONE!

  • These guys must be special forces...they got helmets!

  • can someone tell me about their bodybuilding workout please ?

  • Oh so that's why the USA is the most powerful military superpower in the world. Now I get it

  • hey unomnacajit11 if the russian aint a serius enemy then the American arent either i mean really if canada mexico and alaska were joining against America they wouldn't last a fucking month. the Russian are strong enough to defend their land but the Amerikans are just to fat to get the fuck up and train. If American soldiers were as good as russian then they would win but the russian will be the strongest in the world until America gets of his ass and to work

  • @laurens397 hate to say it friend, but America is not a real person.

  • @laurens397 First of all, Alaska is a state in the United States you dipshit. Secondley, even if Canada and Mexico did try to invade the United States, the cowards would get destroyed if they engaged a small town militia. Hence, what you said is retarded.

  • truth about Russia, from military experts : they can't wage more than 2 simultaneous wars the size of the 2008 georgia war and not for more than a few months. If all small nations like Chechnia, Georgia, Moldova, Daghestan, etc started war with Russia at the same time, Russia would dissintegrate and would be left with a country the size of Belarus. USSR is gone, oligarchs and corruption rule Russia now. It will never be a serious threat to the world again. The emperor has no clothes !!!

  • @unomnacajit11 Russia is bether then you

  • @unomnacajit11 You are brainless retard, seriously, corruption? Russia compared to other European countries are doing fine. War against Georgia wasnt bad for Russia, Gerogians got their asses kicked, Russian forces didnt even used whole armed forces, just couple of divisions and plus, Russia didnt use their best technology against them. They used couple new armors , but soldiers were equiped with old AK74s, drived T80s and BTR80s.

  • Awesome, I'd like to get a glimpse at what the BASIC training must be like :O

  • Spetsnaz.... The name itself sounds badass.

  • this shows the west might just of lost world war 3 if we fought russia

  • Song?

  • @KrazyHawk1219 read the description

  • @dolippa

    '10km in 25 minutes'

    Absolute rubbish. The world record for 10km run is 26:17. There is no way whatsoever that ANY physical training in ANY regiment would make this a requirement. Not even Special Forces. A recruit would have to dedicate his life to running, instead of soldiering. And learning 4 languages? What a pointless waste of manpower for those who couldn't. 5 years? what with no ops? because that's the best training an SF could get.

    Even comparing SF's is ridiculous! 

  • @dolippa none of that shit matters if they have no skills dealing with the cultures of the other countries they invade. Brute strength and brutality will only get you so far if you don't know how and why your enemy fights.

  • holy fucking shit these guys are badass's

  • @dolippa Too bad spetsnaz get massacred very quickly, we can only reflect on the chechyn hostage crisis. None of us should speak because none of us have been through it or have any idea what either training is like so just shut the fuck and and use your brain to realize you would not be able to make it through either of the two training pipelines. Dipshit.

  • This is the manliest video on youtube.

  • this looks fun despite its basic training

  • @dolippa Where did you get this information from?

  • @dolippa i dont want to be mean but you mustv had to make the 10 km part because the fastest 10km time is about 26 minutes and some change lol

  • @dolippa the fastest recorded time for someone to run a 10km was a little over 26 minutes.

  • @dolippa by the way the seals basic is only 7 months thats not including there other schools that the navy seals go through im not saying i would fuck with a spetsnaz but at least understand that navy seals have intense training as well navy seals have proven themselves on the battle field look up operation red wing.

  • @undeadsinner13

    Yup probley. The Russians would probley win that war.

  • @dolippa the reason SEAL training is 7 months is because americans do everything right the first time. Seal qualification training is 7 months but there training continues even when they have graduated from Seal school. when they arent on a mission they are training. you have no proof that SEALS are inferior to Spetznaz.

  • @joejackson16 Actually, BUDS (Fresh meat) trains for 7 months. When they are finished they are SEALS, from then on they will go to weapon training. BUDS training focuses on more on mental, SEALS training focuses more on finesse. US, SEALS have different stages for training, as well as different special forces. Where as Russia, depends on their Spetsnaz the most. Plus, they are border by China, NK, and other European nations. While we only border Canada and Mexico. Russia have more competition.

  • @brbn93 so what are you trying to say? are you disagreeing with me or agreeing? regardless of there competition navy seals are better at there jobs than spetznaz are at there jobs.

  • @joejackson16 Depends on the tasks, all special forces are train for specific tasks. You can't go and say that SEALS are the best in the world. The Israeli special forces are amazing also, imo they are one of the best special forces, since they grow up in a war zone their sense of alertness are higher than most. Also, we as a nation are getting more and more out of shape, due to laziness. That can indicate even though our SEALS are the best, the rest isn't ?

  • @joejackson16 Define the role of the Spetsnaz vs the role of the Navy SEAL. Be as specific as you can, for the benefit of the rest of us, please.

  • @Ratkill im not comparing them against each other. they train for different mission types. im not saying that the spetznaz role is more important than the seals or the other way around.

  • To be quite honest the Spetsnaz are probably the worlds greatest badasses, the americans to be quite honest are arrogant, America is better in a warzone, Spetsnaz are more like third echeloned from splinter cell, they go in, and get shit done.

  • @Iamthespy2275 Indeed they are.

    I was lucky enough to receive 1 month of training by a Spetsnaz agent during their stay here in the US and it was amazing-and brutal even a Green Beret friend of mine couldn't keep up with the demands of Spetsnaz training.

    as for why they train so hard look at all of what they deal with in Mother Russia...they are SWAT AND Special Forces all at once...so imagine if the SEALS or Green Berets had to do SWAT duties also ON TOP of hunting down terrorist abroad...

  • what is this song called?

  • @TPKguitar Stena by Black Obelisk you can get it on itunes the whole alblum is great. Thanks to this video its become one of my favorite bands.

  • IS THIS RUSSIAN ROCK? lol music sounds cool voices are soo annoying

  • @dolippa because they train longer dont mean their better .. 5 monthes then in ACTION doing REAL THINGS is still training its expierence while your REALLY being shot at.. 5 years doing drills... hmm whos gunna be better after 5 years.. but who cares whos better we aint fighting  anyways

  • Hey ass faggots. Stop bullshittin around. As of now we can't tell if the seals are "better" than the spetsnaz fore there hasn't been any conflict between them. The spetsnaz training is far more hardcore than the seals'. In fact, the spetsnaz training would be ILLEAGLE in the US.. But that doesn't mean they are better. We will never know for sure untill they are at war.

  • @JTsmokingbaby and when that war happens we'll all wake up under a Russian flag,,,it'd be like Red Dawn..minus the Wolverines...unless Patrick Swayze's ghost is gonna unite them and teach them guerrilla warfare *scoffs*...

  • "My military is better! - No, mine is! - America/Russia/China is better!" Well guess what? My dick is better than all of your countries and militaries!

  • @dolippa SEALs train for 3 years before they are deployable, not 7 months.

    BUD/s = 6 months

    Advanced SEAL training = 2 1/2 years

  • @dolippa  Leave it to Russia to kill there own people

  • seal training is 7 months but to get there they were training for a lot longer than 5 years. american military is way better. Delta is better than Spetsnaz.

  • @chillaxer1993 Which Spetsnaz are you reffering to?

  • What a bunch of idiots gathered here :)

    10km run world record is about 27 minutes.

    Check before posting bullshit.

    Everything else you said, dolippa, is not true either.

  • @Vultar666 The 7 month training is not true nor is the 10km sprint, but all the other facts is probably true. Many Spetsnaz die in GRU though fatalities are widespread in any other division.4 languages is a fact.And I know that Spetsnaz are dropped 5 meters(probably a safe way for a helicopter to leave immediately).They are dropped higher especially over water and at moving speed.

  • @dolippa Seals training is actually 18+ months, even though it is shorter, it is more coordinated. Not just a bunch of gorillas running around and smashing each other's face in. You make them sound weak, Seal qualifications are: Swim 500 yards within 11 minutes. Rest 10 mins. 42 pushups (within 2 mins) rest 2 mins 50 sit-ups within 2 mins rest 2 mins 6 pull ups (no time limit) rest 10 mins and run 1.5 miles within 11 minutes. And that's IF you can make it through BUD/s, do some more research.
  • @michael1995hamilton The training with deathrates and lots of fatalities are found in Spetsnaz GRU, those freaky mysterious guys.Im not sure about the running and smashing their heads in but those are just for show.And Im pretty sure thats not the only training they have, they had mind conditioning and they knew how to pilot airplanes, tanks.But 75%? of GRU's training are unknown.Respect for the SEALs.

  • @michael1995hamilton

    try spending 2 weeks in forest with only a tent, weapon and full gear. You get the food from nature. And top of that it's -20 c... The drills make you warm but once you start cooling down after sweating it's just shit. That's Finnish army. Im not saying it's better the Seals or Spetsnaz, but it sure is rough. We had to do those qualification things above with full bags in our back. Except for the swimming and sit-ups of course.

  • @michael1995hamilton Hey man where did you get these seal qualifications(swim,pull-ups,s­it-ups,etc.)? Are they true? Im just wondering ...thanks for the reply in advance!

  • you can have the greatest fighters in the world, be the best shooters or the most endureed or have the most intense training but if you dont have good support elements to go with the Operators then they are useless. Example you have a plane full of Spetsnaz but do not have the abiliy to shield their radar signature then that entire team is useless. If you Spets. team can speak 4 languages but doesnt have a SATCOM system to talk to other people because the rest of you miltary is shit.

  • @dolippa umm thats funny cuz the world record for the 10 km run is just over 26 minutes i beleive.... ??

  • @dolippa it takes the spetsnaz 5 years to learn what a us Spec ops task force learns in 7 months? are they slow? and i know i sound rude but you are talking about a full 5 years training and doing drills even after spetsnaz learn their shit right? seals don't always get to go out. know why? cause a single seal team is so effective the others get all the fun taken away, so all they do is train and practice, some for an entire decade before they get discharged. don't bullshit yourself, please.

  • @ilikebacon247 who´s bullshitting who? SEALs are good,but Spetsnaz are better,some even start in summer camps,others die during training...It´s well known that Spetsnaz have most brutal training program in the world so don't come bitching here 'bout who's better...And one more thing,if anyone needs help,it' s SEALs,cuz all they do is call air support while pissing their pants up...

  • what song is that ?

  • Simple.... the spetsnaz are an example of some of the best fighting forces in the world.... it is a disgrace to compare them to American special forces. The only people better than the spetsnaz are the SAS