Wow, your lectures are very explanatory. I'm only 14 but I have high aspirations of becoming an astrophyscisist. Please keep posting videos like this :).
have you ever asked Dyson, or one of the older guys in TP what they think about 4 potential UFT? how would schwartz sing. be linear in 4-D spacetime?
You dont think Higgs mech is needed and tensor metric satisfies, but wouldnt that be 'Higgs field' by diff name and with less dimension, or maybe *Higgs* action makes it have scalar field? so charge accumulates mass in field tensor? ok but is there a quantization of attraction and so back to higgs type mass?
So far, I pitched only one "older guy" who was an arrogant string theorist. I did learn something from hime (I needed a +J in the Lagrangian). I am confident the real singularity in GR will not be in GEM due to details in the derivation of the exponential metric. The story of gauges is looking cool. I have to have a gauge invariant theory for EM, for gravity, and I need to also break that symmetry. For massive particles, the trace of the symmetric tensor is not zero, a scalar field.
Wow, your lectures are very explanatory. I'm only 14 but I have high aspirations of becoming an astrophyscisist. Please keep posting videos like this :).
ChewieFlakes 3 years ago
We have new experiments that violate charge conservation.
Come to OverUnityDOTcom to see them.
Regards, Stefan.
overunitydotcom 3 years ago
Id like to read any papers, published or not that you have written on the theory in all its detail.
Tefer65i 3 years ago
have you ever asked Dyson, or one of the older guys in TP what they think about 4 potential UFT? how would schwartz sing. be linear in 4-D spacetime?
You dont think Higgs mech is needed and tensor metric satisfies, but wouldnt that be 'Higgs field' by diff name and with less dimension, or maybe *Higgs* action makes it have scalar field? so charge accumulates mass in field tensor? ok but is there a quantization of attraction and so back to higgs type mass?
FarFromEquilibrium 3 years ago
So far, I pitched only one "older guy" who was an arrogant string theorist. I did learn something from hime (I needed a +J in the Lagrangian). I am confident the real singularity in GR will not be in GEM due to details in the derivation of the exponential metric. The story of gauges is looking cool. I have to have a gauge invariant theory for EM, for gravity, and I need to also break that symmetry. For massive particles, the trace of the symmetric tensor is not zero, a scalar field.
sweetser 3 years ago
dude, I can almost follow you but , oh fuck who am I kidding? you get over my head quickly but this is beautiful even in my (temporary) ignorance.
FarFromEquilibrium 3 years ago
I have similar feelings. I know what I know, and it is never enough.
sweetser 3 years ago