This is a game that happened between Anderssen and Kieseritsky in 1851 as the description says. It's not the blue print for a foolproof strategy, it's not a classic trap. It's an amazing game by Anderssen sacrificing a ton of material to get a checkmate. So of course there's a lot of what ifs and "he didn't have to do thats". It's a fascinating game, thanks for uploading it.
This man was a genius! He could've probably solved partial differential equations while solving a rubik's cube while inventing some crazy math while playing chess (and winning!) all in his sleep!
I'm fairly new to chess....So probably thats why I don't get it.....Why does black play the b5 pawn without any cover for it?The white bishop is free to take it :-O
@abhiroopron To move the bishop off the line attacking the f7 pawn, which is a major weakness for black especially in the King's gambit accepted opening.
You guys have to realize, things that are obvious today, weren't so obvious back then. Theory has taken a long time to develop into what it is today. Things in the future will seem obvious but we don't know them now.
@LKC9215 Duh...... I was answering to this statement: "Well said.. That is the beauty of chess, beauty of life as well". How get I ever fiond a chess game a cause of frustration???
@Nadrealis Exactly my friend.! Thats why personaly i dont accept to compare the old grandmasters with the new ones. How u can compare person who develop chess theory (Alekhine, Capa, Lasker, etc) and players (Anant, Gasparov, Kramnik, etc) who studied it. Sorry for my bad english
the move at 1:40 confuses me.while there is so much going on , why would he make a passive move like Na6 ? maybe he calculated and saw no danger .He missed the queen sac i guess..
I am not suggesting I'm better then Anderssen or Kieseritzky by writing this, but there were some bad moves in that game. Way too open and fluid. Even pushing relaxed.
I see a few things you REALLY don't see in modern chase players, but back then people had different opinions on what was a strong or weak move. Weird how the game is still able to have paradigm shifts and new play styles all these centuries...
But while I can admit that Bxg1 instead of Qxg1 could be just a blunder of Kieseritsky I am completely fazed about why he schould play Na6 instead of Nc6 later on. That is a very unusual move (one doesn't develop the knight on such a bad square unless one is forced to - nothing prevented Kieseritsky from developing it on c6) that makes me think that the game - as presented - has been composed. Notice that the knight developed on its usual square c6 would have prevented any mating moves from A!
This is so nice that it must have been composed. I mean why would black play Bxg1 instead of Qxg1 to capture the other rook?? Of course the bishop at c5 was attacked by the white bishop but the queen move would defend it while at the same time attending to the same objective (capturing the second rook at g1) and would also threaten Qf2+ with the next move while the move played Bxg1 makes completely no sense considering later continuations (the only one could think of would be slow Qd4, Qf2)!!
The whole point of the advancement of the pawn prior to the Ng7 was that the Queen was protecting g7.
If you took the rook with the Queen that would have been your last move since you'd no longer be protecting that square. Your bishop would not have saved you.
Ng7+, Kd8
Qf6, Nxf6 (or pxfg)
Be7#
The position was lost as soon as black stopped protecting g7.
The guy gave up his Queen and both his Rook in order to check-mate his opponent. If you can't even see what he did, you should probably learn the game before you talk.
Beautiful game. Especially the end. :)
VictumRoManius 1 week ago
This is a game that happened between Anderssen and Kieseritsky in 1851 as the description says. It's not the blue print for a foolproof strategy, it's not a classic trap. It's an amazing game by Anderssen sacrificing a ton of material to get a checkmate. So of course there's a lot of what ifs and "he didn't have to do thats". It's a fascinating game, thanks for uploading it.
Kariakas 3 weeks ago
Why does Andersen play 20. e5?
jkid1134 1 month ago
@jkid1134 Never mind, I see that he is preventing his knight from being captured by black's queen.
jkid1134 1 month ago
Error at 49 seconds: Moves 10 and 11 transposed. White's g-pawn is supposed to move before the Rook.
minstrale 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
google "gambitking" to play online chess
tillytally2101 2 months ago
nice sacrifice =)
futuramaishot 3 months ago
@aleksuu if white didn't move his queen to f6, black's knight would have captured the bishop on e7
UrAvgAzn 6 months ago
Minchia!!
cuqquascianesi 6 months ago
White didn't have to give up his Queen. He could have checkmated black by moving his bishop to e7 instead of giving up his queen.
aleksuu 6 months ago
@aleksuu the knight was guarding e7 before it was baited out to take the queen
Jmaculata 2 months ago
Comment removed
Longbauch 1 month ago
@aleksuu Nxe7
escriticapop 1 month ago
Chess more more fun and mysterious before computer analysis.
mikeusat 8 months ago
I am pretty sure theres a problem at 0:48 . White does not move his rook at this move, he moves the g pawn first and then moves the rook..
yorrickm 8 months ago
wonderful
xFerris 9 months ago
Sometimes getting the better position is more important than larger numbers.
EnegueVokatsehs 10 months ago
@EnegueVokatsehs Not really having more pieces gives you an advantage during opening, mid, and end game scenarios.
pinespeakz 9 months ago
Why move pawn to b5 early on?
CopsUrMasterAndLord 10 months ago
why did he make that e5 move at 1:40 ?
callmewisdom 11 months ago
@callmewisdom So that when he goes Ng7, Black can't respond with Qxg7
TheBrianTruong 11 months ago
@TheBrianTruong oh, thanks
callmewisdom 11 months ago
Best chess game ever.
Achilles94627 1 year ago
Brilliantly played. I bet he had to hide his smile when he thought of this during this game
narutonamizake 1 year ago
the white is advance like 10moves.... nice mate..
ezejb 1 year ago
This man was a genius! He could've probably solved partial differential equations while solving a rubik's cube while inventing some crazy math while playing chess (and winning!) all in his sleep!
supertwichy7 1 year ago
Cool!
SuperDreamliner787 1 year ago
Comment removed
avidan39 1 year ago
beautiful game
1LonelyStargazer 1 year ago
this is why chess is so cool.........
majotnf 1 year ago
I'm fairly new to chess....So probably thats why I don't get it.....Why does black play the b5 pawn without any cover for it?The white bishop is free to take it :-O
abhiroopron 1 year ago
Comment removed
lfroggyl 1 year ago
@abhiroopron Bryan's counter gambit: Black trys to lure the White Bishop away from it's attack on the weak f7 pawn.
lfroggyl 1 year ago
@abhiroopron To move the bishop off the line attacking the f7 pawn, which is a major weakness for black especially in the King's gambit accepted opening.
chunkysajchunky 1 year ago
Never have I won a game losing all my major pieces. Genius!
RK831 1 year ago
What a beautiful mate!! This is when chess becomes art.
Fastball2000 1 year ago 3
gah! I'm stunned!
dingstroyer 1 year ago 2
very bold sacrifices
quite a game
EXXC0MN 1 year ago 3
That was incredible!!!
Why is this called the "immortal" game?
VitalSigns1 1 year ago
I guess it was called Immortal because white never died although he lost almost all his battalion!!!
jbragadeesh 1 year ago 4
@jbragadeesh Shut up not much, he still have two knights babe !:) lol
RandyIsC0o00o0L 1 month ago
@VitalSigns1 it's called immortal because when u rip shit up like that, u go down in history immortalized in the game of Chess.
KBoogs719 1 year ago 6
Damn thats the most thug game of chess I have ever seen lol
Colingoesfast 2 years ago 3
I like!
pauljanson 2 years ago
You guys have to realize, things that are obvious today, weren't so obvious back then. Theory has taken a long time to develop into what it is today. Things in the future will seem obvious but we don't know them now.
Nadrealis 2 years ago 24
Well said.. That is the beauty of chess, beauty of life as well
jbragadeesh 2 years ago 6
Indeed, indeed. Well said, my good sir, to you as well.
FlameTongue22 2 years ago 3
@jbragadeesh Explain how that is beautiful please, seems more like a cause of frustration to me.
bierbuik 1 year ago
@bierbuik White lost a Queen and both Rooks yet still won the game.
LKC9215 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LKC9215 Duh...... I was answering to this statement: "Well said.. That is the beauty of chess, beauty of life as well". How get I ever fiond a chess game a cause of frustration???
bierbuik 1 year ago
@Nadrealis Exactly my friend.! Thats why personaly i dont accept to compare the old grandmasters with the new ones. How u can compare person who develop chess theory (Alekhine, Capa, Lasker, etc) and players (Anant, Gasparov, Kramnik, etc) who studied it. Sorry for my bad english
vardalos1980 1 year ago
the move at 1:40 confuses me.while there is so much going on , why would he make a passive move like Na6 ? maybe he calculated and saw no danger .He missed the queen sac i guess..
Prash158 2 years ago
I am not suggesting I'm better then Anderssen or Kieseritzky by writing this, but there were some bad moves in that game. Way too open and fluid. Even pushing relaxed.
It's a nice mate though. Real nice.
SlackersJournal 2 years ago
I see a few things you REALLY don't see in modern chase players, but back then people had different opinions on what was a strong or weak move. Weird how the game is still able to have paradigm shifts and new play styles all these centuries...
kkatkkong 2 years ago 3
it was not played this quickly when it was actually played obviously.
think about that
Prash158 2 years ago 2
evergreen is better than this one
BR177 2 years ago
niciest game ever...rlly great..no comm..those guys were masters of chess...
papakuck 2 years ago
But while I can admit that Bxg1 instead of Qxg1 could be just a blunder of Kieseritsky I am completely fazed about why he schould play Na6 instead of Nc6 later on. That is a very unusual move (one doesn't develop the knight on such a bad square unless one is forced to - nothing prevented Kieseritsky from developing it on c6) that makes me think that the game - as presented - has been composed. Notice that the knight developed on its usual square c6 would have prevented any mating moves from A!
getrockneteblume 2 years ago
i am sorry,but you are wrong.if Knight goes to c6 we have Nc6-Nxg7+,Kd8-Bc7#.checkmate again
spooky0834 2 years ago
The idea behind that move was he tried to stop Bc7. It worked in that respect but there was nothing he could do to stop checkmate.
blackbtty123 2 years ago 2
This is so nice that it must have been composed. I mean why would black play Bxg1 instead of Qxg1 to capture the other rook?? Of course the bishop at c5 was attacked by the white bishop but the queen move would defend it while at the same time attending to the same objective (capturing the second rook at g1) and would also threaten Qf2+ with the next move while the move played Bxg1 makes completely no sense considering later continuations (the only one could think of would be slow Qd4, Qf2)!!
getrockneteblume 2 years ago
He didn't capture with the queen because forced checkmate followed two moves later. Queen has to protect the g7 pawn :)
supermann121 2 years ago
Listen to what the man says dude.
The whole point of the advancement of the pawn prior to the Ng7 was that the Queen was protecting g7.
If you took the rook with the Queen that would have been your last move since you'd no longer be protecting that square. Your bishop would not have saved you.
Ng7+, Kd8
Qf6, Nxf6 (or pxfg)
Be7#
The position was lost as soon as black stopped protecting g7.
ManhattanProject9 1 year ago
sound?
christopherm2k 1 year ago
I am amazed. Thank you, I was looking for this game to be reproduced.
whitewizard122 2 years ago
In 1851
jbragadeesh 2 years ago
hey very nice vid :D i uploaded that game too on my vids.
Chess8x8 3 years ago 4
Wow, no wonder it is called the Immortal Game.
Ratipharos 3 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Why don't i see nothing special in this game?! Except a lot of bad moves..
multipurposetool 3 years ago
The guy gave up his Queen and both his Rook in order to check-mate his opponent. If you can't even see what he did, you should probably learn the game before you talk.
Gamecubesupreme 3 years ago 32
multi learn the game of chess, don't be a fucking dumb ass
Hawkhunter07 3 years ago 8
@multipurposetool Because you don't know how to play chess?
alinusD 1 year ago
thats a crazy game
homeworksuks 3 years ago 5
wow
jameson63926 3 years ago 5
the greatest game ever i wish it was narrated
deekblue128 3 years ago 5
@deekblue128 there are many narrations of this game actually
jesuistahmid 1 year ago
Wonderful (:
plaguekia 3 years ago 6
A truly great game!
eggba 3 years ago 6