Added: 2 years ago
From: JusticeForMaddy
Views: 45,421
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,168)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • After reading Kate's book, I don't think its possible that they were involved in their daughter's disappearance. Reality is it simply would have been impossible for them to have covered up an accidental death considering the amount of attention they had form day one. Supopsedly they hid the body in a place within close proximity without anyone noticing and then over a week later disposed the body off site. With the media on them 24/7 this would have been close to impossible.

  • @robbiewest1000

    Absolutely,And the scenario that they hid her in the fridge is laughable.

  • She IS nice LOL

  • Houghgrees made a New Years resolution to clear off! Thank god for that! I'm sure he'll be around with some other username.

  • @tpacI0 fuck off you tim cunt

  • Comment removed

  • as the profits have been frozen pending the outcome of the libel trial in February. If the McCanns win their case (and I'm expecting the people in high places who've been protecting them to ensure they do) then the profits from Amaral's book will go to them. Perhaps a better question to ask is why is it OK for the celebrity child-neglector Kate McCann to write a book about this case, and nobody else is allowed to,

  • Comment removed

  • @houghgree2

    Children,children,be nice.

    Houghgree,that is one thing I find interesting about you,your total lack of awareness on what a troll is.

    You are the biggest troll on YT,posting thousands of posts on the McCanns.Obsessed and narcissistic.

    You have absolute no intention of withdrawing from the Mccann debacle,so don't be so silly.Amarals profits may have been frozen,but that is not his doing now is it he was quite willing to take the money,buying himself a nice new car.

  • @aureliejane and |Gerry bought a nice new fridge for 5a

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Aurliejane What was that you said about me following you around? Thank you for proving my point (again) that you stand the truth on its head. What else can one expect from a McCann affilaite and habitual liar? You say you've no interest in Jackson, but obviously an obsessive interest in defending a pair of child neglectors-and trying to discredit the complaint of paedophilic behaviour against one of them, Even to the extent of inferring that I myself might be a paedophile.

  • @houghgree2

    Oh go away you idiot! Not sending it to me now?There is only one,sorry two liars on here.You and your alternate account Nutbornyesterday.

    You ARE following me,you mention me constantly,perve my account,Explain why you are so obsessed with paedophillia? I already know.

    I said the video was on there because of personal reasons,now take your ridiculous comments and shove them.

    If the cap fits,well,work it out.

  • @aureliejane Never sent my last reply to you directly because something was amiss with the reply button. I'm obsessed with paedophilia in as much as that the Gaspar

    statements are relevant to this case. Musical preference as no relevance to this

    case in answer to your post as inmyheartgirl

  • @houghgree2

    Much as I agree with inmyheartgirls views I am not her,I am also not Kate,or Kates Mum,I am also not hackhead? or Kates Aunty? I am not related or neither do I know them.I did not suggest you were a Paedophile,but possibly a victim.

    Ther eis no suggestion of Paedophillia against the McCanns,only one sad accusation from would be friends,no proof,no substance,a bit like accusing you of being a paedophile.

  • Comment removed

  • @aureliejane As stated previously I don't beleive a word you say. To say there is no suggestion of paedophilia against Gerry McCann (and David Payne) is another of your lies. There is no conclusive proof that the suggestion is false. If there were, I'm sure that the sue-happy Gerry McCann would have taken legal action by now.

  • @houghgree2

    I before e accept after c.

    They sued everyone that they feel they should,The Gaspar's statement was not worth sueing over.

  • @aureliejane You say the Gaspars statement was "not worth sueing over". Strange then that they felt it was important enough to prevent it entering the mainstream media via either a superinjunction or as a clause in their damages they received from the press. They want the police file kept quiet for some reason from the masses. And so would I if I had a police file that looked that suspicious.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1

    Houghgree, I guess by "them" you mean the McCanns You are making things up,you dont know if there was a "superinjunction"or a clause,if the police file was relevent,it would have been published,I have faith in the British police,which is more than I have in the PJ.

  • @aureliejane There is obviously a superjunction or clause in the damages suit. How else do you explain the british media not discussing ANY of the suspicious contents of the police file since it was published three and a half years ago. The newspapers are being criticised for phone hacking to search for things and you expect me to believe they wouldn't have published the Gaspars statements which is right in front of their eyes unless there was a preventative clause in place. Get real.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1

    Search for what? You think it is ok to hack a dead girls phone? You havent a clue,obviously.TheGaspers statement was dismissed,why do you think that is.Think really hard.

  • @aureliejane You haven't answered the question?

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1

    No,I was hoping you had been abducted,or got a job,or a life,whatever came first,

    What question,if it is related to the Gaspers,you know my answer.

  • @aureliejane Anything to silence me then. We all have hopes. And we are all disappointed sometimes.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1

    Have a nice Christmas,I hope it is everything you want it to be,except for one thing,

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 Yes, aurliejane gives herself away as to who she is every time she posts. I mean how does she know wether the McCanns think the Gaspar statements are worth suing over or not? How does she know wether the McCanns think it is worthwhile conversing with us on youtube. She gave herself away big-time when she stated yesterday that she "knows" what happened. Not "believes" what happened but KNOWS what happened. For once she's telling the truth

  • @houghgree2

    So who do you think I am? go on,and please try and be sensible,I know it's hard.

  • Comment removed

  • @houghgree2 Indeed there is every indication (two of them actually) within the statement that gives validity to the complaint. Add to this the evidence of Yvonne Martin against David Payne and the disclosure that a previous holiday was subject to a similar complaint and er..it don't look good for poor Madeleine.

  • @houghgree2

    Amy Winehouse lookalike? no way,that is Christina Perry! listen to the vid!

    But your love is reserved for Eddi Reader right? There is no accounting for taste is there.

  • @houghgree2 Yes we've had this before haven't we? If we mention paedophilia then we are accused of it ourselves. And yet the McCanns and their friends have actual paedophilia complaints against them and yet it is deemed nonsense. These people are almost funny.

  • MrNotbornyesterday - bullshit detective!!!!!! F**k me backwards, this gets funnier by the minute. Now I'm going to help you out here a little MrNotbornatall, people go and check out his channel. If you need a laugh, seriously, go check out his channel. Its priceless! He's figured it all out, with the help of an undeveloped brain, some shit he read on t'internet, the NOTW and some Fat Yank who wants to sue the Mccans. An America trying to sue someone, now this is news.. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH HAHAH

  • @thebrummie Thankyou for promoting my channel.

  • @thebrummie It must also be noted that my videos are based on the police files and the words of the people themselves. You stated otherwise and you are therefore a liar.

  • I write again....HOUGHGREE2 thinks that he is big enough for Gerry Mccan to be having a conversation with him..... Sherlock Holmes he is not!!! One of the best laughs I've had in ages

  • COMEDY GOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just nearly shat myself laughing. HOUGHGREE2 thinks that he's having conversations with Gerry!!! HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAHAHAHAHA­HAHAHHAHAAAHAHAH ( deep breath) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA­HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA­HAH (wipe dribble from chin) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAA­AAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA­HAHAHAHA

    Its alla conspiracy Houghgree....I genuinely cant stop laughing, you need to get out more HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHah Geyy?! HAHAHAH

  • HA this is hilarious, am I reading this right children. You pair of toddlers think aureliejane and I are 2 other people who used to post on here with different names. That is superb, tell me another, I'm nearly pissing my pants here at the absurdity of not only your pathetic little arguments with NO SUBSTANCE except for "oooh I just got a feeling maaaan", but now you think there is a need to hide from you pair of kiddies, what u gonna steal my pocket money. This is a keeper

  • but lets not stop there. What is the procedure for Portugal in relation to missing children? Do parents immediately go and search when the police arrive? Do they search before the police get there? What is the exact procedure? Go on, quote me the procedures, if you cant then you are an ill-informed, heartless little twat, you little fucking idiotic toddler. You have the mental capacity of a teenager who doesnt know why he thinks what he does.."cos I just do,right!

  • @thebrummie Hackhead you don't have to refer to the police files to know that the McCanns were out jogging and playing tennis whilst many of the locals were scouring here there and everywhere (some of them taking time off work) looking for Madeleine. Just refer to the interview with Jane Hill here on youtube.

  • @houghgree2 Absolute garbage! You are talking absolute and complete utter rubbish. So you've comcluded from a simple fact, they were not involved int he physical search, something that is common practice and certainly not irregular,that they may be involved in the disappearance. Just bollocks mate, talk about jumping on the bandwagon. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE, PHYSICAL, CIRCUMSTANTIAL or OTHERWISE TO SUGGEST THEY WERE INVOLVED, just the ramblings of idiots

  • @thebrummie Hackhead did you not watch the interview with Jane Hill? Kate admits that she never physically searched for her daughter. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDNECE PHYSICAL, CIRCIMNSTANTIAL or OTHERWISE TO SUGGEST THAT THERE WAS AN ABDUCTION. And indeed, there was not. Madeleine McCann is dead and has been since May 2007. That's why the McCanns were out jogging whilst many of the locals were on a wild-goose chase "searching" They knew she was dead.

  • @houghgree2 - "out jogging", fuck me i nearly pissed myself laughing when I just read that, feel free to fill up my inbox with some more comedy gold "out jogging" HA,

  • @thebrummie So if my child vanished you are saying the decision for me whether to search for them is to be based on " common practice in almost all westernised countries" and that I would think that and therefore not search. A decision to search would be an emotional one, not a socially accepted one and would be done without thought you complete twat.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 thts right baby dick, I'm a complete twat am I , remember I'm not the one spouting childish, "Viz" comments about the Mccans being guilty, because you read it in a newspaper headline, and now think your fuckin Poirot. Go back on your playstation you infantile little pleb. There is no substance in your argument at all, absolutely nothing you have said or presented in yr twattish little posts convince anyone. Feel free to abuse anyone who differs wont you. Prick

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 - what did the mccans do in the 90 minutes from the time they realised she vanished. C'mon Inspector Gadget. Exact details, where they went, who they spoke to, what they said, what they did physically, where they went. YOU HAVE NOT GOT A FUCKING CLUE. Lets have an argument with some substance little man, their is nothing in your argument whatsoever, so I'm ripping it, and all you can do is burp shat at me because you've got nothing, just a childish "hunch"

  • @thebrummie Well said thebrummie.

    Look at all these pathetic "internet detectives" with their magical crime solving methods "oooh I can just feel it when someone is lying and that...." !!!

    What a bunch of BS.

  • @KTK401 - well said my friend. Too many haters on youtube think they can say and do what they like without any consequences, and then when you disagree with them, their age comes shining through, its like telling a kid he cant have his lollypop, they just have a little baby tantrum until they get their own way. Newscorp have helped breed idiots like these, they are the only ones who dont know it, again probably because they dont have enough life experience to empathise with almost anything

  • @houghgree2 i just watched your vid, you know the one with what 2 conclusions you draw because of the fact they didnt look themselves ( common practice in almost all westernised countries), and they showed no emotion to an apparent siting of her ( one of over a hundred a year since her disappearance ), you have some work to do my friend, your theory is not only juvenile and pathetic but holds no water whatsoever. Come back with something concrete and maybe you'll get more than 500 views!

  • MrNotbornyesterday - what an absolute cock you my non youtube friend. The Police files and the bla bla bla...you've only read what newscorp and the Potuguese media want you to read. The Police files are not for public record. Also, I can confirm that I can both read and write, the difference between me and you is, you are a fucking idiotic little prick who thinks he's uncovered a conspiracy that doesnt exist (you are basically a puppet to gutter press media) and I, on the other hand am normal!

  • Fuck me backwards! I'm surrounded by people who have been brainwashed by the guitterpress. My word, I'm almost speechless.. MrNotbornyesterday...how the fuck do you know whether they searched? Were you there? Its a Newscorp headline you moron, you've read a headline and then believe it. IDIOT!! Annazt...the trace found in the car was a headline written in Portuguese, manipulated by slime at NOTW who then printed a LIE!! There was never any trace of Mad' in the car, ever. Sablepheonix = twat!

  • @thebrummie The police files and the words of Kate McCann show and prove respectively that the McCanns never did any physical searching. You should learn to both read and watch the appropriate video before posting utter drivel.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 - do some real research little man. Please quote me something that I havent already read in a Portuguese newspaper, or a newscorp publication, then, and only then, will I enter into a debate with you. Presently, you are beneath debate, so fuck off back to your cave uhg boy

  • @thebrummie

    Strangely I thought that maybe the Portuguese police should have looked for her? It was in the middle of the night,and they had the twins to take care of.Apparently,they should have done the job of the PJ.by the time they arrived(the PJ), evidence was contaminated by cigarette ash,etc.talk about passing the buck.

    Where do you start looking in a foreign country? where?

    It must have been utterly terrifying

  • @aureliejane You don't grasp the irony of your latest post do you? What's that "they had the twins to look after"? Jeeze, pity they didn't look after them the nights they went out socialising and swinging isn't it? Those two scumbags probably care as little for their two remaining siblings as the one whose death they were responsible for and whose body they disposed of.

  • @houghgree2 Are all these newbies really old posters using other names? Mighty suspicious. Same level of retarded comments, that's for sure.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 Yes, I think so. Indeed, if you refer to my responses to the brummie, I in turn refer to him as "Hackhead"-who it is. KTK401 is obviously aurliejane/aunteve ect.etc.etc.

  • @houghgree2

    Ahh,get your blankie and give it a suck,you will feel better.You and your buddie nby are like insecure children,but then so would I be if I were you,all the garbage you have spouted.KTK401 is obviously not me,but dont feel threatened lol.

    I hear you have been missing me,don't fret now, I am back.

    Neither of you have children,so your diatribe on what parents do and don't do is a bit rich.

  • @aureliejane I don't believe a word you say. I believe you're a compulsive liar although I cannot prove that. Your inference that because I don't have children I should not have an opinion about the two celebrity child-neglectors, is as fatuous as everything else you post. Gerry and Kate McCann are two sewer rats-and maybe worse than that. The British Media may treat them like film stars, but the Gaspar statements suggest they maybe nearer to Brady and Hindley.

  • @houghgree2

    You don't believe a word I say? Oh,I am mortified! No you cant't prove I am a compulsive liar anymore than you can prove any of the waffle you spout.

    Brady and Hindly? in which way do they resemble them? A clear and lucid account please.

  • @aureliejane I said that the Gaspar statements suggest that the McCanns may have more in common with Brady and Hindley. Note the word "may". I hope that little Madeleine died peacefully, I fear she may not have done. So in regards to the "clear and lucid account" you demand, read the Gaspar statements yourself. And can you please prove that Madeleine was kidnapped by a Portugese paedophile. A clear and lucid account please.

  • @houghgree2

    How many children did Brady and Hindley kill? 5.How many bodies were found? 4.Those children were lured to their death.

    No I fear that Maddie is deceased too.Taken out of her bed by a Paedophile,but I hope that one day she will be reunited with her family.

    The Gasper statement is irrelevent,dismissed by the leicester Police. "And can you please prove that Madeleine was kidnapped by a Portugese paedophile"

    Can you please prove she wasn't.! .

  • @aureliejane You state that the Gaspar statement was 'dismissed' by the leicester police. You certainly have no evidence at all for that. The only evidence we have is that they withheld the statement from the PJ even when the PJ had asked them for information on such behaviour because of another complaint about a previous holiday. This indicates clear protection for some bizarre reason. The Gaspars statement was ignored and the leicester police have refused to release the McCann file......WHY?

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1

    If you think that Brady and Hindly are remotely like the McCanns,you are more psychotic than I thought.Anyway,what is it with you and Houghgree? you write the same,sound the same,have the same rancid views?

    A very disturbing realization,if it walks like a donkey,sounds like a donkey...it's a donkey

  • @aureliejane If I think that the McCanns are like Brady and Hindley it does make me psychotic at all. I concur with the PJ that the child died in the apartment as you know. I don't know exactly what happened. But if paedophilia was involved it makes Gerry McCann WORSE than Brady and Hindley. I hope to God paedophilia was not involved but am I supposed to believe that Kathryn Gaspar made her statement just for the fun of it?

  • @houghgree2 Yes. As if someone makes a complaint of paedophilia lightly. The posters here who ignore this complaint are as bad as those who may have indulged in the activity. Utterly shocking.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 The posters who "ignore" this complaint have connections with the McCanns. I'm quite certain about that. Tpac10 is Gerry and aurliejane is either Kate or Kate's mother. They'll try to laugh my assertions off but it was your good self who alerted me to whom these posters might be. Therefore they know the circumstances of the child's death.

  • @aureliejane Houghgree2 and myself write in a very different manner as can be clearly seen by an idiot. We are both amused no doubt at all the pro McCanns who keep changing usernames on a regular basis and then accuse us of it. A bit like the McCanns fabricating a paedophile abduction when in reality............Gaspars statement anyone???

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1

    No you don't,you write exactly the same.Change user name? such as? you wish lol

    Kate or Kates Mother,hahahahahaha.Do you think they would bother with the likes of you 2,the Chuckle brothers,Oh dear,hilarious.tell houghgree he is a fool! but very amusing lol

  • @aureliejane How do you know "they" would bother with us or not?. I'll give you a reason why "they" (you) might want to do so. The same reason "they" bothered taking legal action against Tony Bennet, Gonaclo Amaral etc.ect. Because "they" (you) are desparate that the truth of this case is never revealed. So desparate that they (you) spend hours on obscure youtube threads perpetrating the abduction fairy-tale

  • @houghgree2

    houghgree,get over yourself,of course they dont give a damn about 2 little trolls who have been spoting the same old,same old for years,And after all,you are entitled to your opinion,are you not?

    Tony Bennet was trying to make a fast buck out of a sad scenario,bandwagon and all that,but if you dont agree,google him!

    Amaral was/is no different,he got sacked,wrote his book,the rest is history.

    I would love the truth to be revealed,whtever it is,to put an end to it all.

  • @houghgree2

    I don't spend hours,I havent been on YT for over a year,I spend a few hours each night checking emails,and know there will always be a message from you,So your statement is a little ironic,how many hours do you spend on here? Every day,every night,waiting like a spider for a fly,so you can pounce.

    Stop messaging me,and I will stop,I know the truth.

  • @aureliejane As stated previously stated, I believe you are compulsive liar and don't believe a word you say. And you've tried that "I'm waiting for you" trick before. Of course you stand the truth on its head being the compulsive liar that you are. You wait not only for me and Notbornyesterday but anybody else who exposes the abduction fairy-tale. I'll believe you though when you state "you know the truth" You have connections with that sick pair and know how they disposed of Maddie;s body.

  • @aureliejane

    Those two are obsessed,and even when they eventually have to face the truth,they will have some puerile excuse .

    They have always tried to say that anyone who exposes their crap is a relative or connected or a friend blah blah,

    Apparently I am the aunt lol,it's quite pathetic.Troll is the right word.

  • @inmyheartgerI

    I am sure there is more to this than meets the eye with HG particularly.The Paedophile thing also.Personal feelings coming into it.etc.

    Either personal experience or abuse within.

    Check the comments I have just sent you,it will be a real insight.

  • @aureliejane I can't stop laughing at the manufactured conversation between yourself (it's you talking to yourself) and inmyheartgirl. The real giveaway is your like for bad music. On your aurlie page you have a vid of Micheal Jackson.On your inmyheartpage you have a film of some Amy Whitehouse look-a-like. It's entirley appropiate that you have a film of Jackson. He's a lot in common with Gerry McCann-namely that he also had complaints of paedophilic behaviour about him. Jacko like Gerry CONT.

  • @houghgree2

    The song "gone too soon" was played at my friends 9 year old childs funeral.

    I have no interest in Michael Jackson.

    My paedophile comment was directed at you not the Gaspers.

  • Comment removed

  • @aureliejane

    Didnt get the comments?send them again please.

  • @inmyheartgerI

    Sorry,sent them again.

  • @aureliejane also had people in high places protecting him. So much so that he was declared innocent in a Court of Law when he was blatantly guilty. Gerry is perhaps even better protected than Jackson. He and his equally ghastly wife will probably never be tried in a Court of Law. They wern't for their child-neglect were they? As for "The Paedophile Thing" it was not me who made the Gaspar statements.

  • Comment removed

  • @houghgree2 Indeed the Gaspars statement (and other evidence in the police file) could indicate these two to be the modern Brady and Hindley. If true then the protection they have clearly received makes this far more sinister than anything in British criminal history. And remember that of all the suspicions and unanswered questions in this case....they would all be answered at a stroke if the gaspars statement is true. A very disturbing realisation. If it walks and quacks like a duck..its a duck

  • @aureliejane Your excuse for the McCanns not searching is absurd. A parent would run around searching like a headless chicken if their child had really vanished.

  • @thebrummie You show yourself for the retard that you are. The McCanns never searched. Period.

  • @thebrummie

    I'd love to discuss this case. How can you with houghgree and nutbornyesterday. Lets face it, its so hypocritical they say the Gaspers statement should have been investigated when the whole case itself was a farce and wrap it up by accusing the parents just summed it up.

    Now the former investigator has sold over 300,000 copies, for his own profit, a book thats a pack of lies, sadly they support it. Then again, Millwall has a few fans but no one likes them.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @houghgree2

    Why dont you do everyone a favour and just fuck off.

  • @tpacI0 I am sure the feeling is mutual.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 tpac Gerry I'd love to discuss this case. How can you with someone directly involved with the death of Madeleine? Let's face it. it's so hypocritical you say the Gaspers statements are meaningless when they were never investigated. When the whole case was a farce and wrap it up by political protection given to you and your wife. Now your wife has sold thousands of copies, for your own profit, a book that's a pack of lies. Sadly, niave and gullible idiots support it. CONTIN.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 My feeling towards Gerry is indeed mutual. I've just posted you my paraphrasing of his penultimate post that precipitated him telling me to fuck off. I deleted the original one but thought it might be worthwhile having it on here.

  • @houghgree2

    Just out of interest,why is ok for Amaral to write his book,which he kept the proceeds from,and also Bennett,who I believe also did a "brochure" which he received money from.

    Explain why that is ok? As if I don't already know.

  • @tillieanne76 Just when I was making a new year's resolution to stop posting about this case, I get a demand to explain why it is OK for Amaral and Bennett to write books. I'm not obliged to explain anything to a troll and if you claim to know the reason what the hell are asking me for? I will say that Bennet's 60 Reasons booklet did not make a penny and was Carter-Rucked because he did not have the financial muscle to take the McCanns on in court. Amaral has not made a penny from his book CON

  • @houghgree2

    So what was your answer? cut out all the detritus ,it means nothing.

  • @tillieanne76 Oh dear sillyanne, u just revealed ur alt a/c, aquabolux!! Gerry is fine thanks - saw him Xmas eve, & am on my way2 GB now to see him as a matter of fact!! Don't b sorry about Eric - onwards and upwards as they say!!

  • @sapphire22011

    I told you ages a go! silly.Dementia?

    You didnt see him him at all lol.But I will leave you to your fantasies.

    Give Eric my love.lol

    Oh btw Gerry is not in the GB atm.wasted journey.Did he not tell you?

  • @tillieanne76 Awww...you are still thinking of me? How sweet. And perhaps that isd about all you have ever gotten right is to think of me. You suppose? I feel so loved !

  • @tillieanne76 Gerry gave me some pounding last nite let me tell u!

  • @sapphire22011

    You are without shame lol

    Happy new Year to you!

  • @tillieanne76 I don t have anything2 b ashamed of, thats why.....its all gud clean fun - and my new GF (pictured) doesn't mind!!

  • @sapphire22011

    Well have a good night! Tillie.

    She looks nice.

  • @houghgree2 exactly ,mind you looking at the fund neither has the mad bint Kate ha ha

  • At the time I found it weird that dogs had sniffed dead body in their car, but now I read they rented the car 25 days after her disapearence.

    And they are still looking for her, so I dont think they did it. Other children has also gone missing in the area, I wonder what horrible thing happened?

  • @annazt11 You seem to think that because they give the impression of 'looking' for her they must be innocent. You must understand that they never actually physically searched for even during the moments after she had gone. This is very suspicious. And remember its very easy with lots of money from donations to set up a fund and a website which may fool people that you are 'looking' and are 'innocent'. THEY NEVER ACTUALLY SEARCHED. Remember that.

  • without the mask, they're con-artists, making money from A STORY THAT'S UNTRUE. WHAT A FRAUD, THEY'RE NOT DOCTORS EITHER. THE LITTLE GIRL, IS ANOTHER FAMILY'S DAUGHTER---PHOTOSHOP --- MAKE MILLION$,FROM THE gullible

  • @SablePhoenixBlu1

    Oh dear,lie down in a dark room,and it will pass dear

  • @aureliejane - ha, thats funny, I just read her/his/its comment.... what a simpleton she is

  • If anybody can just dig the beach and any soft land within a 3 mile radius of the apartment to prove my theory wrong. I would be grateful.

  • @TruthSeeker1845 The police will not put financial commitment into a search for the body without a credible lead and likely success. So nobody is searching for her (or whats left of her). Except the McCanns who are pretending to search in an attempt to convince us all they are innocent of wrongdoing.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 And you could have added that the police are quite certain that the McCanns have ensured that their daughter's body will never found anyway. And you could have also added that the police are quite certain that this is a political whitewash as you stated on another youtube thread.

  • @houghgree2

    Posting at 5:30 in the morning should tell you that I get up early to go to work and works for a living. Unlike you dosser who stays up to 5am posting on Madeleine videos.

  • @houghgree2

    OK, if I'm Gerry, do you want to pretend to be Goncola Amaral or would you prefer to be Pat Brown?

  • @tpacI0/Gerry Posting at 5.30 in the morning you really are worried aren't you? With regards to me being Amaral or Brown, I've no need to lie about who I am or anything I say.The opposite is true in your case. You stated sometime ago that I was Tony Bennet. That was one of several give-aways as to who you are. Who the hell knows about Bennet and the MF only members of Team McCann. Then of course was your "fuck-off, something to masturbate on rant " I'd hit the nail on the head......

  • @houghgree2

    Well done for understanding! Hard I know for you, but well done!

  • tpac/Gerry not hard for me to understand at all that you are desperate to stop any sections of the British Media publishing anything that questions your abduction fairy-tale. You're so desparate to prevent the truth coming out that you constantly moniter obscure threads like this on youtube

  • @houghgree2

    Treated like royalty? Yet again a quote from you that confirms you haven't got a bloody clue what you're talking about.

    Get a life houghgree, the reason they were there today was to give evidence about slanderous press, you know, the clap trap that you believe.

    It was only after they took legal action against this clap trap that the media started to see sense. Unfortunately, you didn't!

  • @tpacI0 Gerry thank for confirming the point I made in my last post that your appearnce at the Levison inquiry today was stop any "clap-trap" that you and your equally evil wife were involved in the death of Madeleine. And of course the BBC predictably gave you full support. All you've got to do now is get Clarence and your other friends in high places to sway a Portugese Court in February. You'll also have to get them shut Pat Brown up as well. 

  • @tpacI0 - completely agree with you my youtube friend. I am having 1-2-1 with this idiot and one of his gimp friends at the moment. Its not like talking to a spoilt little brat, I think he is one. Feel free to join in the fun again whenever the time best suits you.

  • "Tortious interference with contract rights can occur where the tortfeasor convinces a party to breach the contract against the plaintiff, or where the tortfeasor disrupts the ability of one party to perform his obligations under the contract, thereby preventing the plaintiff from receiving the performance promised. The classic example of this tort occurs when one party induces another" what tosh!

  • I remember "tortious interference with business”, lol What exactly does that mean

    

  • Unlike 99.9999% of the UKs population, I thought to myself while watching the enquiry today, I guarantee houghgree posts a load of bollocks in retaliation to what the McCanns said today. So I logged onto to YouTube, came to this page and guess what? There's houghgree posting his usual bollocks. Wonders never cease.

    What will it take to convince houghgree that the McCanns, despite what profit seeking self proclaimed detectives say,are innocent.

  • @tpacI0/Gerry I thought to myself while you were speaking at the enquiry today that the fawning BBC would highlight what you and your equally hideous wife would have to say. Of course I was not wrong. Good God, the BBC and the rest of the British Media have been treating you like Royalty since the outset of this farce. I suppose today's appearance was to remind any would-be dissenters in the media what might be in store for them if they don't toe the line as it were.

  • Mrs Mcann should keep that mask off, I'd hate to see how ugly she really is

  • @EpicPremonitionUK

    Pot,kettle and black Sid,going by the photo on your profile,my dog is still in shock lol

  • @inmyheartgerI you can barely see my face in that picture, I wouldn't say I'm the best looking guy around but I sure as hell ain't ugly, you on the other hand, well, that silhouette is fine, keep it that way..

  • @EpicPremonitionUK

    Cant take it! then dont give it out.

    Stupid ignorant troll.

    (I can see enough)

  • @inmyheartgerI whatever you say old chap, you have insecurities you've yet to overcome, lol @ troll, coming from the nob who goes from a McCanns related comment to my Channel Profile lol

  • @EpicPremonitionUK

    I'm not an old chap,I am a female.It seems by your account that you are a decent person,why then would you write such stuff? You looked at my profile? it's human nature,gives you an insight.

    To comment like a prepubescent 12 year old gives you no credit.

    Maybe you could read up on the McCanns and give na intelligent comment,dosen't matter "whose side" you are on.

    Just saying.

  • @inmyheartgerI I have read up on the McCanns you bloody idiot, where d'you get your news from, The Sun?

  • @EpicPremonitionUK

    You have read up on them? that is ok then lol.

    I dont read tabloids.

    So you read that Kate is ugly,and needs to cover her face,you read THAT in the SUN did you?

  • @inmyheartgerI The video thumbnail of this video actually...

  • @EpicPremonitionUK

    I guess my reply is,that it is unconnected with the subject,if you want to critisize their parenting skills,or the way they have handled it,or that you think they are unmitigated liars,so be it,i just dont think your comment was relevent,that was all.

    And has no bearing.

  • @inmyheartgerI you can the see the bitches lies through her eyes! the amount of time's she's smirked on camera is a joke...watch the clip where Gerry gets pissed off and walks off the interview, look at the bitches face crack a smirk, like she gives a fuck about the kid...

  • @EpicPremonitionUK

    Oh pleeze! you are deranged,go away (and get a new picture lol) Neanderthal.

  • @inmyheartgerI trust me! you ain't seen the video! my pictures fine!! I'm not gonna put up a portrait someone might recognise me!

  • I'm sorry to say that I think that Maddie was taken out of the country early on,and I don't think she is still alive unfortunately.If she is,I just hope she is is not suffering,because she did not deserve any of this.

  • @tillieanne76 I doubt very strongly she was taken out of Portugal. In my oppinion she is just nearby.

    Someone please dig up the beach and surrounding areas.

  • @TruthSeeker1845 You are right to an extent. If she was abducted (which I don't believe for one moment) then she would almost certainly be nearby or not too far away from the crime scene. If the parents are involved (which I believe) then she could be anywhere or even nowhere (remains destroyed) if this was planned effectively. The fact that there has been no sighting at all in over 4 years only makes it more likely the parents are involved.

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 I believe that tpac10/Gerry and his wife will have made absolute certain that Madeleine's body will never be found. Just as their friends in high places like Clarence Mitchell will make absolute certain that they will never be brought to justice. They are so confident in the protection they have that they are at the Levison hearings today. Even if they lose their case against Amaral in Portugal in February, the decision will be condemned by their pals in the CONTINUED

  • @houghgree2

    Did you see the news,looks like the Mccanns are going to get a load of money from the press,due to the lies and slander they were subjected to.It's going to be very interesting.

  • @inmyheartgerI Yes, I did watch the BBC News fully expecting what that hideous pair had to say at the Levison enquiry to be the main headline. I was not wrong. It is another tactic by the McCanns and the BBC to continue the ongoing brainwashing of the British public that Madeleine was "abducted". I'm not aware that there is any further legal action against any British newspapers. If there is of course it will be interesting. Equally intersting of course will the outcome of their CONTINUED

  • @houghgree2

    Pat Brown?what has she got to crib about?,nothing she say's has any factual info,it's all about what she thinks?

    Amaral does not talk about shagging his wife? probably because he was shagging,as you so charmingly put it, someone elses,not much to brag about really.Was the word shagging actually used?And to be fair,To be honest,you seem to be a bit too interested inthe Mccanns love life,at leat they were married lol.If you dont mind me saying,you are getting somewhat worked up.

  • legal action against Amaral and Pat Brown's legal action against. The legal action Amaral is particularly perverse. It must be unprecendented in legal history for a person or persons in this case to be trying to ban a book having published one of their own! Forgive me for being crude, but Amaral does not talk about shagging his wife in his book. He deals with the nitty-griity of the case and explains very logically and plausibly why he and his collegues concluded that the child died CONTINUED.

  • @houghgree2

    Remind me what Pat Brown is sueing them for? Also,there is no comparison between the McCanns writing a book,and Amaral,why dosent he sue them? You really have some very bad hate issue's that need addressing.

    calling her a sick,disturbed woman is sick and disturbing in it's self.

  • @inmyheartgerI Oh so you know what Brown is suing those two scumbags for? It does not matter whether you think her reasons are wrong, disreputable or whatever. It is the outcome of her legal proceedings is what matters as indeed is the outcome of the McCann action against Amaral in February. With regards to me using crude and overt terms about sex-I was alluding to Kate's book. Which vindictes my opinion that she is a sick, disturbed woman. And of course her husband (tpac 10) is equally sick.

  • @houghgree2

    Did Kate mention the sh-- word in her book?

  • @inmyheartgerI No I don't think Kate did use the word "shagging" in her book, but she did talk about her sex life which equally confirms that she is indeed disturbed. Her husband however has used crude language publicly. Indeed, there is a film of him using foul language in front of his and the children of his Tapas friends. Also, when my I suggested whilst posting on here to him that he was Kate he took an absolute fit! I quote "Fuck Off, Have You Something On!" Yes, I had wrongly CONTIN.

  • @houghgree2

    Then you should not of said she did,it is lying.if you are referring to him using the F word on a private video,well,so what,you think people dont swear in front of their kids?

    Where is your evidence that tpac is kate or gerry,it's not hardly likely is it.

    I really think you are going to have to eat humble pie,it is getting worse by the day for the anti Mccann trolls.

    And do you think it fair that her private diary was given to the News of the World,and published without consent

  • @inmyheartgerI I've no proof at all that tpac 10 is Gerry anymore than I have proof that you have connections with the McCanns. Have you any proof that tpac is not Gerry? I believe that is who the poster is and I believe you have connections with the McCanns. It is irrelevant in essence whether I'm right or wrong. As for things getting worse for "anti-McCann trolls". They cannot get any worse. There has been a systematic brainwashing campaign by the British Media for the last five years that CON

  • @houghgree2

    No,I dont have proof that tpac is not gerry,I have no connections with them,you say that everyone who defends them has connections.I just dont think it is likely.It is about privacy,the NOTW,remind me what has happened to them?The PJ gave the notw her diary,says just everything about them,and the corrupt Amaral.

    You are right,they cant get any worse for you.

  • Madeleine McCann was "abduction" and systematic vilification of the policemen who concluded she was not. That brainwashing was demonstrated on the BBC news this evening. There was a brief respite when the McCanns were made arguidos and the certain newspapers published certain things questioning their version of events-re today's hearing. I've always stated and indeed did so again earlier today on here, that I don't believe the McCanns will ever be brought to justice. In that sense, things CON.

  • cannot get "any worse". I would not be at all surprised if the people in high places who have been to quote Spudgunne "promoting, protecting and pampering" them for the last five years, manage to influence and corrupt a Portugese Court in February. As for Kate whinging about her private diary been published in the NOTW. Jeeze that takes the biscuit. The same Kate you mean who serialised her book about her sex life in the Sun? Perhaps if the NOTW had offered her money she'd have had no gripe.

  • @houghgree2 Did you notice that the leveson inquiry introduced the subject by saying Madeleine had been abducted!!! Now you know the level of corruption we're dealing with........

  • @MrNotbornyesterday1 I just thought I'd have a quick look on here before I go to bed and I've caught your post. No, I did not catch that but I KNEW what those two scumbags had to say at the inquiry would be topping the six o clock news on the BBC. As previously stated, the fact that they were there demonstrated their confidence in the protection they have from people in high places. They were there also to send out a message to any sections of the British Media who may not want to adhere CONTI

  • to the party-line as it were, that action will taken against them. The systematic brain-washing of the British Public that Madeleine McCann was "abducted" will continue unabated. Also as previously stated, we will know in February if their friends in high places can manipulate a Portugese Court. If they cannot, the British Media will either not print a word or set about vilifying Portugese laws on libel (just like they've vilified the Portugese Police)

  • @inmyheartgerI - I cant believe what I'm reading, I'm having a "set to" with this idiot as we speak, he is unreal. I thought I'd read through the pages of comments only to find he thinks he's big enough to be having an argument with Gerry himself!! Priceless!! and also confirmation that this kid really is exactly that, "a kid". well done for standing up to these idiots, obviously their parents never did

  • thought that tpac10 was Kate when in fact it was Gerry. So the next time you refer to Channel, the girl from Rothley as "losers", "low-life" etc remember that Gerry is not averse to using "low-life" language himself. Mind you a couple who treated their daughter like dirt in life and dirt in death and who subsequently de-frauded schoolchildren and pensioners are very low indeed. No wonder, they are desparate to stop the truth of their role in their daughter's death coming out!

  • @houghgree2

    Channel,the "girl" from Rothley,i dont know who that is,They are not desperate,they want the truth to come out,which is why th