If you can understand all these equations in that speed you show you are great!:) I really wanted to learn something but only saw some great scientists under mortal combat:)
Ha, I actually have this book, I love electrodynamics, from a practical standpoint it is absolutely necessary in the design and development of new and better RF antennas, and this requires knowledge of EM right down at atom level. QED is the determining factor in the success of several other inventions that could change the world
@VERGIS92 Griffith's 3rd ed.Great book! Funny you mention quantum electrodynamics, I don't find too many reader-friendly books on technological applications for this subject. At the research level the literature is ultra specialized. As photonics moves in on electronics, I think at the integration level a knowledge of QED will be fortuitous for anyone investigated this area.
1. curlE=-9H/9t (Faraday`s Law),2.curlH=j + 9E/9t (Ampere-Maxwell law),3.DivE=q (Coulomb`s law),4.DivH=0 (Gauss`s law). q=charge density,j=electric current. If q=j=o, both E and H satisfy the homogeneous wave equation. 1.&2. are evolution equations, and 3.&4. are constraints.
Although I have great respect for David Griffiths professionally, his book is very overrated. Your video is very nice, like how the Delta function squeeks in at :25
if any of you have taken a course using this text, it is mortal kombat. it is used as a prelim to jackson's classical electrodynamics..need I say more.
Jackson's book is horrifically difficult. It was the first book where I literally got lost in the math (even with two semesters of mathematical physics, real analysis, and complex analysis). I could study that book for a decade before I got comfortable with it. The homework problems are just plain impossible at times. You must have a good understanding in Electrodynamics before tackling Jackson's book. But I'm sure you know that by now all to well.
THIS WAS GREAT!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHA......have not laughed this hard, or this much, in MONTHS!!! Thanks for making and posting it!! Good sense of humor, and thanks for helping me to get rid of some flusteration. I Needed The Break!!.....
Neither. It was me getting frustrated at my E&M homework one night and finding a way to vent. I think it came out rather well, other than the one error that is documented somewhere in the comments.
@Matrix29bear Neither of them. This is a complete course in 1:12 minutes; this is what I would call thunder course (rsrsrs)... Perhaps the book is very good on graduation level. I've studied on it.
@bdiz86 I really don't know why students get so mixed up when it comes to Gaussian and CGS. The 1/4pi counts the theoretical volume of the origin of a so-called Gaussian surface shrunk to an infinitesimal size. In any other system, that unit is dimensionless. I still find it strange how this can approach a finite number, but the integral over a delta function is one, so go figure!
Formulas ending in zero mean there is no source. For the mag field B, del B = 0 because its an endless loop and goes back on itself. Its a closed circle. The might be many such things in the air or ether.
Wasn't it that if del*B != zero, then it would explain magnetic monopoles, if they did exist. Actually, Maxwell's equations beg for magnetic monopoles, but we currently "know" that they do not exist.
How do we know? It might be we simply haven't discovered them yet. Our particle accelerators might simply not be up to the task of creating magnetic monopoles. Anyways, cool film! I'm actually studying this book(Griffiths) right now and have an exam of it on monday. I'll probably be thinking of the mortal combat song the whole exam now ;).
curl B = J means the mag field encircles the current J, a tube along the exterior of a wire carrying current lets say. curl E = -dB/dt is AC to start with and has E, which is a straight vector, anchored in a circular path. Quickly going back and forth tangent on a ring path. If B is radial, as in Tesla's vortex coil, the path is more evident.
Dude, only two of them are wrong, and its the same mistake because I used the same picture twice. Its at 0:22 and 1:05 for del x E = 0. It should be del x E = - partial(B) / partial(t). (Although technically for the case of a static magnetic field (B = 0), this is true). As for the others, I just checked again in Griffiths to make sure, and yeah, they are all correct.
In the case of Surface Integral of B * dA = 0, again, it is true that along a line, aka, Line integral of B * dl != 0, as it is mu_0 * I_encl, but for a closed surface, it is zero, as the field lines all cancel out (makes E&M much easier when stuff cancels out like that, especially when doing Gauge Transformations on it) If you look at 0:21 to 0:22, you can see how I have made this distinction.
Case: del * B = 0. In order to create a magnetic field, you either need a changing electric field (Faraday's Law), or you need an electron to move somewhere (Ampere's Law). If you draw out the diagram of a source point and draw divergence lines around it, you can see where the electric field is created. But those field lines aren't changing direction, they are constantly going in a single radial direction. Hence, no magnetic field.
I love it. You probably noticed that there's a little skip in the music halfway through - if you did it over without the skip it would be perfect. I gave it 5 stars anyway. Thanks for putting that together.
Very funny, just FYI you made a typo in the title of your video "Electrodynamics" :D I LOVE it, and I totally forgot to tell you, I showed it to the lounge the other day and everyone LOVED it too :P
Maybe, once I take Senior Quantum next year (assuming I survive E&M). I'm thinking Schrodinger's wave equations for the various electron states to the tune of the Imperial Death March?
0:57 sonya xD
klaudion 1 week ago
Sonia is man!!!!!!
Kuwaiti1990 4 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
Here is a summary of what Maxwells equations MEAN relative to the summary at 1:00
1. The Electric flux is proportional to the enclosed charge
2. A changing Electric field induces a changing Magnetic field
3. Magnetic monopoles DO NOT EXIST
4. A changing Magnetic field induces a changing Electric field.
2&4 produce the speed of light as a function of (permeability and permittivity)
myrtlebox 1 month ago 2
Very informative.
TheSyrupMan 2 months ago
HAHAHA!
ramiro48 3 months ago
W T F ???
0tecnica00of00skate0 5 months ago 2
awesome!
FragZz 5 months ago
Sonia's got facial hair :S
xenoepist 6 months ago
just interpretations of the fundamental theorem of calculus - which is the equation for everything.
vertexgo 7 months ago
Where is Nicola Tesla's picture ?...he is the one who discovered that this formulas can be used to get free energy from a vacumm space.
lustatus 8 months ago
@lustatus He never did any such thing.
qed100 8 months ago
sonja... grew a beard, the years have not been kind to her.
andyelgrand0 9 months ago
If you can understand all these equations in that speed you show you are great!:) I really wanted to learn something but only saw some great scientists under mortal combat:)
hobosyan 11 months ago
Ha, I actually have this book, I love electrodynamics, from a practical standpoint it is absolutely necessary in the design and development of new and better RF antennas, and this requires knowledge of EM right down at atom level. QED is the determining factor in the success of several other inventions that could change the world
VERGIS92 1 year ago
@VERGIS92 Griffith's 3rd ed.Great book! Funny you mention quantum electrodynamics, I don't find too many reader-friendly books on technological applications for this subject. At the research level the literature is ultra specialized. As photonics moves in on electronics, I think at the integration level a knowledge of QED will be fortuitous for anyone investigated this area.
69erthx1138 11 months ago
seeeeeeeeee!!
difuso2204 1 year ago
some people are trying to learn, stupid !
what a douch !
blindcutter 1 year ago
It's a good video ! More tech in "Wonderful electric energy-Tesla wireless" by HorizonDelta
HorizonDelta 1 year ago
I'm heart the Dirac delta function
tparker37 1 year ago
18 People fail at physics...
gvsfgdf 1 year ago
In order of appearance:
James Clerk Maxwell (Kano)
Carl Friedrich Gauss (Liu Kang)
Michael Faraday (Raiden)
Andre-Marie Ampere (Johnny Cage)
Alessandro Volta (Scorpion)
Joseph Henry (Sub-Zero)
Hendrik Lorentz (Sonya)
drstrangelove09 1 year ago
must be TEKKEN 3 (tournament of warriors)
joseftran 1 year ago
how lame is this that I am watching this shit on a friday night
chillman442 1 year ago
ugh.im so sick of that book.
Jillageyelash 1 year ago
Haha that was awesome
seniorbooboojuice1 1 year ago
I laughted my ass off XD
lllLaquetepariolll 1 year ago
:D that's the stuff.
idiosynkrass 1 year ago
I should be doing my Griffiths homework instead of watching this video. Good job btw!
Midvinterblot542 1 year ago
:))))))) funny shit right hereee :)) haaa
obogz 1 year ago
thats awesome
BeingOfLight111 1 year ago
LMAO at the names introduction
Kuwaiti1990 1 year ago
absolutely fantastic idea
albeilmate 1 year ago
I've been butchering thru multiple Griffiths' books as well, this is really a nice refreshing wind :-) Thanks.
vanderbilt887 1 year ago
1. curlE=-9H/9t (Faraday`s Law),2.curlH=j + 9E/9t (Ampere-Maxwell law),3.DivE=q (Coulomb`s law),4.DivH=0 (Gauss`s law). q=charge density,j=electric current. If q=j=o, both E and H satisfy the homogeneous wave equation. 1.&2. are evolution equations, and 3.&4. are constraints.
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
I not speac English
DenShagiah 1 year ago
This is awesome... Is really good
physicist21 1 year ago
lol nice delta function
Plutoniummatt 1 year ago
haha i've got a test tomorrow on the electrodynamics portion of this book! why am i on youtube!
detibry 1 year ago
::Great video!
The equations are beautiful and fascinating.
The song adds to the tingle.
From Mortal Combat.
Funny cause in some ways there is resemblances...
dansharkhunter 1 year ago
still the best music in the world =) thanks for the equasions i passed the ones i havent passed and understood alot out off them thanks.=)
TheVladimirtk 1 year ago
damn 0.03 is my text book for electrodynamics class....lol nice... !! way to go Griffiths
cpinnago 1 year ago
song?
Channypogosticks 1 year ago
Although I have great respect for David Griffiths professionally, his book is very overrated. Your video is very nice, like how the Delta function squeeks in at :25
69erthx1138 1 year ago
Griffiths is not my favorite, but it is decent. If you plan to be a physicist, books like Greiner or Schwartz are much better.
xixzxzxyx 2 years ago
lol
KakHazhar 2 years ago
that's the music maxwell heard every day
rocco133 2 years ago
griffiths! NOOOOOOOO!!! LOL man ahven't seen that since undergrad!
natere2 2 years ago
Epic WIN
Cymator 2 years ago
Thats great! Hell yeah. Good break from studying. Thanks.
josephboog 2 years ago
Epic.
Ritzoid 2 years ago 4
haha i love the mortal combat song and how badass it makes the physicists look...... :D
gvsfgdf 2 years ago 3
hahaha this is possibly the best video on the tube
jimmyshitbags 2 years ago 3
x-D lol GOLD!!
13nick27 2 years ago
jajaja freaky!!
poloacho 2 years ago
not many female viewers here then
BarriosGroupie 2 years ago 2
Hahahaha, Sonya.
quadricode 2 years ago
Now do that with a logical progression that goes into Quantum Electrodynamics from Maxwell's Equations and I will be impressed XD
TheDireAvenger 2 years ago
Haaaa lorentz-sonya
Troinik 2 years ago
Wouw, is this real?
mijnagendaismooi 2 years ago
im a physics student in holland, and i have this book and i just wanted to say:
HAHAHAH that was funny XD the video just throws equations at you with exciting music.....well no need to read the book now...
UrRedeemer 2 years ago
creative .
jaafar42 2 years ago
if any of you have taken a course using this text, it is mortal kombat. it is used as a prelim to jackson's classical electrodynamics..need I say more.
995715202 2 years ago
subzero? LOL I love this
995715202 2 years ago
Thanks, I needed a good laugh. laughed so hard I thought my ribcage was going to explode!
995715202 2 years ago
Griffith's text is a doddle whereas jackson's is... on another level altogether
BarriosGroupie 2 years ago
Agreed. Being in grad school now, Griffiths has become a favourite of mine to translate Jackson's.
bdiz86 2 years ago
Jackson's book is horrifically difficult. It was the first book where I literally got lost in the math (even with two semesters of mathematical physics, real analysis, and complex analysis). I could study that book for a decade before I got comfortable with it. The homework problems are just plain impossible at times. You must have a good understanding in Electrodynamics before tackling Jackson's book. But I'm sure you know that by now all to well.
1czelaya 2 years ago 2
@1czelaya yea, Jackson is tough, but getting through it makes feel just a tad taller!
69erthx1138 1 year ago
lol, is that really Sonya?
valitzu 2 years ago
Hahaha! Genius! :D
I learned a lot from this video, thanks! ;P
Thymonico 2 years ago
if it wasn't for Maxwell, we wouldn't be watching this in the internet............
ogirv101 2 years ago 36
exp^5/5
AndrewRiot 2 years ago
LOL EPIC 5/5
And Mortal Combat indded guys! (Can't be anything but Griffiths for the first frame, huh? :P )
ForceDestroyer 3 years ago
I've just realised that I'm a geek - I thought that was great!!
eazylee369 3 years ago 3
what is the music? sweet vid BTW
Cdamann 3 years ago
THIS WAS GREAT!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHA......have not laughed this hard, or this much, in MONTHS!!! Thanks for making and posting it!! Good sense of humor, and thanks for helping me to get rid of some flusteration. I Needed The Break!!.....
Hawk3766 3 years ago
Is this an introduction or a math slide show?
Matrix29bear 3 years ago
Neither. It was me getting frustrated at my E&M homework one night and finding a way to vent. I think it came out rather well, other than the one error that is documented somewhere in the comments.
bdiz86 3 years ago
@Matrix29bear Neither of them. This is a complete course in 1:12 minutes; this is what I would call thunder course (rsrsrs)... Perhaps the book is very good on graduation level. I've studied on it.
anonimoculto 1 year ago
EPIC
Kunzahe 3 years ago
hahaha what the fuck did i just see?
hamsterpoop 3 years ago
This video is great! Will there be a cgs (preferably esu) version because i hate SI
johgall 3 years ago
Bah, I'm hating cgs units for my Nuke & Particle class. I keep converting back to SI units, its just natural for me.
But if you want, just take the 1/ (4*pi*epsilon_0) to be equal to 1 and go from there.
bdiz86 3 years ago 2
@bdiz86 I really don't know why students get so mixed up when it comes to Gaussian and CGS. The 1/4pi counts the theoretical volume of the origin of a so-called Gaussian surface shrunk to an infinitesimal size. In any other system, that unit is dimensionless. I still find it strange how this can approach a finite number, but the integral over a delta function is one, so go figure!
69erthx1138 11 months ago
best soundtrack evar ^^ but i hate maths and physiks ^^ the end is cool with the persons :P
EnDieG 3 years ago
This video was disappointing because I wanted it to explain the equations.
neil1337 3 years ago
lol yeah. I thought I was going to get a good science vid . . .
Liaoxiornis 3 years ago
Yeap - same here.
AqualinespiritPL 3 years ago
WOW !!!!
Love it !!!!!
DonCorleoneQ8 3 years ago
Ya know, i learned nothing, but it was still cool
TheBestAboveTheRest 3 years ago
LOooooooooooooooooooool :D FAVORITE!!!!!
lolhun1988 3 years ago
nice, I'm adding this to my favorites
eldominicanboy 3 years ago
erm
lol
griffith for the win
BrodyPianist 3 years ago
this is the end of all my Electromagnetic woes
kanepart2 3 years ago
a2+b2=c2
ttt6973 3 years ago
damnnn-iitt!! Nice job.... *XD
MajorUtah 3 years ago
Sorry, I meant "test" =)
00TrissMerigold00 3 years ago
I have an oral text about Maxwell's equations tomorrow. I don't know whether to laugh or cry watching this video =)
00TrissMerigold00 3 years ago
adding to favorite to watch every day before exams!
thoughtheglass 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Sweet!!!
Max11551 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAA, Best video ever!
StudFI 4 years ago 11
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
job well done
ycalm 4 years ago 4
Formulas ending in zero mean there is no source. For the mag field B, del B = 0 because its an endless loop and goes back on itself. Its a closed circle. The might be many such things in the air or ether.
teslaandlyne 4 years ago
Wasn't it that if del*B != zero, then it would explain magnetic monopoles, if they did exist. Actually, Maxwell's equations beg for magnetic monopoles, but we currently "know" that they do not exist.
bdiz86 4 years ago
How do we know? It might be we simply haven't discovered them yet. Our particle accelerators might simply not be up to the task of creating magnetic monopoles. Anyways, cool film! I'm actually studying this book(Griffiths) right now and have an exam of it on monday. I'll probably be thinking of the mortal combat song the whole exam now ;).
dramorez 3 years ago
curl B = J means the mag field encircles the current J, a tube along the exterior of a wire carrying current lets say. curl E = -dB/dt is AC to start with and has E, which is a straight vector, anchored in a circular path. Quickly going back and forth tangent on a ring path. If B is radial, as in Tesla's vortex coil, the path is more evident.
teslaandlyne 4 years ago
Lots of your formulas ending with "=0"
Don't think so, what book you WRONGLY have this taken from ?...
oztronix 4 years ago
Dude, only two of them are wrong, and its the same mistake because I used the same picture twice. Its at 0:22 and 1:05 for del x E = 0. It should be del x E = - partial(B) / partial(t). (Although technically for the case of a static magnetic field (B = 0), this is true). As for the others, I just checked again in Griffiths to make sure, and yeah, they are all correct.
bdiz86 4 years ago
In the case of Surface Integral of B * dA = 0, again, it is true that along a line, aka, Line integral of B * dl != 0, as it is mu_0 * I_encl, but for a closed surface, it is zero, as the field lines all cancel out (makes E&M much easier when stuff cancels out like that, especially when doing Gauge Transformations on it) If you look at 0:21 to 0:22, you can see how I have made this distinction.
bdiz86 4 years ago
Case: del * B = 0. In order to create a magnetic field, you either need a changing electric field (Faraday's Law), or you need an electron to move somewhere (Ampere's Law). If you draw out the diagram of a source point and draw divergence lines around it, you can see where the electric field is created. But those field lines aren't changing direction, they are constantly going in a single radial direction. Hence, no magnetic field.
bdiz86 4 years ago
Your curl of E at 22 seconds is wrong.
It should be -dB/dt
RainbowWerewolf 4 years ago
Yeah, thanks for pointing it out. I'm not sure if I even have the file anymore to re-make it. Another erratum to Griffiths?
bdiz86 4 years ago
mathematic Kombat
jmm1233 4 years ago
was that faraday as johnny cage? I for one hope so
herzogsbuick 4 years ago
lmao... amazingg
akashchokshi 4 years ago
very fine vid, 5 stars :)
frostwow 4 years ago
Never heard of Maxwell's Equations described this way!
pterodactyl7 4 years ago 2
very entertaining , well done
frostwow 4 years ago
Electrodynamics tests are a mortal kombat v_v
darrell14 4 years ago
I was hoping to watch a bald dude with a beard giving a lecture on these equations
jmc8197 4 years ago
Lol, wtf, this is freaking awsome
dsalpha18 4 years ago
UQE ÑOÑO..................
aljinu 4 years ago
I love it. You probably noticed that there's a little skip in the music halfway through - if you did it over without the skip it would be perfect. I gave it 5 stars anyway. Thanks for putting that together.
Grendelmonster8u 4 years ago
Very funny, just FYI you made a typo in the title of your video "Electrodynamics" :D I LOVE it, and I totally forgot to tell you, I showed it to the lounge the other day and everyone LOVED it too :P
galaxycoff 5 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
phillipkp 5 years ago
Will there be a Scrhoedinger's equation counter part?
pahilario 5 years ago
Maybe, once I take Senior Quantum next year (assuming I survive E&M). I'm thinking Schrodinger's wave equations for the various electron states to the tune of the Imperial Death March?
bdiz86 5 years ago
OK. Good luck! Keep up the good work!
pahilario 5 years ago