Added: 3 years ago
From: richarddawkinsdotnet
Views: 595,478
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,174)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He reminds me of Sam Harris, both by looks and by the way he talks... Is it just me?

  • dude you are so wrong, medians are real and even though some are chancers i don't believe this

  • @mossy207

    Medians certainly do exist, but if you meant to say medium then no, you are wrong, grow up.

  • Are they gonna stand up the entire interview??

  • just two dudes, standing around talking about psychics.. must be high. lol i kid, i kid. i wonder what dawkins is liked stoned. that idea is simply fascinating to me.

  • A lot of nice lights etc in the background, maybe he shoulda got a second camera instead...

  • does anyone know what the hell richard dawkins is babbling about?

  • Boo! Sarted watching. Came to part 3 and channel 4 blocked it.

  • Over half a million people lost interest within the first ten minutes lol

    ..Losers.... :P

  • @aaron9099 They just got distracted by all the other awesome videos in the sidebar :)

  • Why do evolutionist's dislike these kind of believers... ?

  • Amazing interview, i personally think that psychic readings are fundamentally sick.

  • I'm feeling that you're going to experience some frustration when you click on the next part of this video, does that make any sense to you?

  • @AbortedHitlerCock HAHAHA! Best user name I have seen!

  • @ultimateinfinite That awkward moment when you leave a comment on an intelligent video while accidentally still signed in as your ironic, facetious and intentionally ultra-offensive grindcore band...

  • 3:14

    "My feeling is..."

    I thought: "Fork off!"

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • What does dawkins say at 1:08 ??

  • @postmasterw00t Folie a deux

  • @ohemsted

    thanks :)

  • Some psychics communicate with spirits, which I dont agree with and what gives them a degree of accuracy on "some" things, and no one can tell me that spirits don't exist because I like many people have had one in my house, things moving and banging, no scientific explanation whatsoever! I know there are many scammers out there though!

  • @SummerJ200 Why would you immediately state the cause as being a spirit? Things "moving and banging" can have many scientific explanations which I doubt you have exhausted, there is no reason to attribute sounds/movements to the supernatural rather than investigating unknown scientific phenomena. I expect you are merely susceptible to the idea of spirits and therefore apply it as a reason for things not quickly explained. I won't say spirits don't exist, but you have no evidence.

  • @BadlyDrawnAlex Not true, I desperately wanted there to be a scientific explanation, as I did not want to believe I had a something else in my house besides me! However things moving, pots banging, door handles going on there own and eerie vibes lead me to my conclusion, but if you have a scientific explanation for all of the above then please, please I await your explanation!

  • Comment removed

  • The camera movements almost make me seasick.

  • @adamski177, not forgetting tim minchin!

  • Why aren't they sitting down? You'd expect two people that are having such a deep and intellectual conversation to at least sit down with a cup of tea or something lol.

  • What's wrong with someone's religion if all they use it for is to make themselves feel better, as in times of grief or desperation?

  • @legr8est1234 The belief in a God or an afterlife is harmless. Religion is when Men in robes believe they have a direct line to God so you should consult them on matters of morality and it is your duty to do your very best to 'save others from themselves'. In practice this means telling non religious people how to live their lives, who they should have sex with and how, what they can and can't talk about. If you want a good person to do bad things, you need religion. We'd be better off without.

  • @carloskies But if a religious person keeps his or her religion to himself or herself, it's all right, right?

  • @legr8est1234 In theory that could work. In practice you run into all sorts of bother. For example, if your religious beliefs tell you to hate someone because they are gay then these religious views are not there to be kept to yourself. Even if you don't participate in stoning someone to death you might hate or fear someone because of what you have read. If you don't subscribe to religion then you are free to develop your morality in line with your own experience. Religion takes that away.

  • @carloskies Most religious people I know are better people because of religion. Religion seems to have only positive effects on them. The hate you mention is, in my experience, limited to the most zealous members of any religion, which are usually a (loud) minority.

    For many people, the main purpose of religion is to feel like they are not alone when they are. If it's limited to that (and it is for most people I know, unlike what the Internet would have you think), I see nothing wrong with it.

  • @legr8est1234 Well most people I know fall into the category of religious but not hate filled and they would all say their life is better for religion. But If you get two groups of people with different beliefs and put them in competition for the same resources then you see hate.

    What if some other religion wanted to knock down your church because the land was sacred to them? Would you just say "ok, we'll move down the road" or would you fight to the death to defend what's sacred to you?

  • @carloskies "If you get two groups of people with different beliefs," I don't think religion/belief should even come up as a reason for conflict. I see religion as a personal thing (which you can share, if you wish, with others of your belief in a church-like setting).

    As for your question, the right to that land would be determined legally. A world in which the right to land is determined based on what one may consider "sacred" is not a functional world. Law must not be influenced by religion.

  • @legr8est1234 If you keep your beliefs to yourself or within your community and you mix outside of that community then in practice your beliefs are a lot like my non religious beliefs and we'll get along just fine.

    I still have concerns though. Suppose I wrote down my entire moral code this morning, then I meet you, we teach each other something new and we both walk away with a new perspective on life. My moral code can be updated but yours stays the same, because God wrote yours.

  • @carloskies If you assume the Bible is my moral code, then yes, it won't change. However, while I believe in a God to some degree, I don't really use the Bible as a moral code.

    Once again, most Christians (and others) I know likewise don't have inflexible beliefs. In fact, I'm quite surprised at how many religious people I know are tolerant of gays and are not opposed to their happiness (i.e. union). From my experience, most modern religious people are reasonable individuals.

  • @legr8est1234 If you had your finger on the Nuclear button and a voice said "Push the button, it is God's will" would you press the button? Ultimately behavior is motivated by beliefs so I think that if people don't believe that God can know and judge them on their every thought then they are free to do good deeds. Have you ever made a mistake because someone was watching you so intently that you couldn't decide right from wrong, you could only reason as to what they thought was right or wrong?

  • @carloskies If I had my finger on the nuclear button, I would pay no attention to what someone else says is God's will. They know no better than I do.

    And I think many people's behavior is better because they feel someone is watching them. Of course, many don't need that sort of belief to do good, but some (see: most religious people) benefit from it. Once someone starts feeling completely alone, without God (which is in some way a symbol for hope), he/she might turn to bad actions.

  • You are alluding to bad people who do good things for fear of reprisals from God. Should this make me want to promote religion as a force for good?

    What about all the people doing bad things under the authority that God has given them. For example those pro-life campaigners who have murdered the proprietor of an abortion clinic. You assume that if we propagate religion that everyone will adopt your liberal stance but History tells us that this is a fallacy. Best not to propagate religion.

  • @carloskies I adopt the view that "people are doing it wrong" when it comes to crime motivated by religion. Those who use religion to oppress others are truly missing the point, and I wouldn't want that kind of attitude to be promoted in any way.

    I also think people who commit crime in the name of religion were educated/raised in an environment where they would've ended up committing crime even if they weren't raised to believe in God. Religion can be both bad and good; why eliminate both?

  • 5.00.. great point, all those shows on tv where the dude says he talking to dead loved ones of the audience is fucking cruel!!

  • MY 2 FAVOURITE PEOPLE!

  • @adamski177 u are from the UK cold reading at work! (u spelled favourite with a u) :D

  • the word cruel definitely comes to mind when i think about psychics.........their techniques sound similar to religions techniques......playing off peoples  grief and claiming they know where our dead loved ones are. come to think of it fake psychics are a lot like fundie christians

  • Sure, we have 2 smoking sections BTW

    Regular and ultra

  • richard's atheism is showing

  • @mlm382 ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww thats nasty

  • I hate agnostics and christians because your so far up your own opinions arsehole that its blinded you to the fact that arguing over opinions will get you no answers.

    Believe whatever you like just dont claim it as fact because its not,and untill people drop the ego we'll just have more and more dumb ass people on this dumb ass rock.Everyone just needs to admit they are agnostic chill the fuck out and wait till you fucking die.I for one watch a whole movie,not try and find out how it ends.

  • @silkysketcha

    You hate agnostics, but think everyone needs to admit they are agnostic? So you hate everyone?

  • @help4343 oops another stoned late night comment mistake.But ya right i do pretty much hate everyone.

  • @silkysketcha

    Hey comrade, welcome to the club

    LMAO

  • @sonykroket Thanks,smoking allowed in this club?

  • It's like watching PBS in the style of MTV

  • you, frankly, look like you are in pain richard, and derren could have helped you.

  • Dawkins is just fishing for an argument or disagreement that isn't there.

  • great show, but keep the friggin camera still PLEASE!!!

  • Two of the most interesting people in the UK! These guys will make any room explode with ideas if you give them just a fraction of a chance. I'm not British but i do believe that guys with minds like these two are the cream of the human race and it is odd how the UK seems to be able to produce these people constantly over the years. Props to the poms!

  • @PeteAnimation its because we have improved in litral thinking and inteligance ironic that i cant spell inteligance or maybe i can i dont know oh well thats why more and more people are becoming atheist

  • sucha slow mind interviewing such an agile one.Its kind of frustrating to watch,Dawkins sounds like he's have a slightly rehearsed parallel conversation at times.

  • How do they stand for this long? And why don't they sit down?

  • @SuperMemzz say that Derren Brown whenever he does a show always gives the impression that he knows it's all fake, there is no magic they are just manipulating the human mind.

  • So, how do we know that Dawkins haven't paid this guy for this trickery so that we believe that psychic are not real! :p ;)

  • Wooooooooo man, it's religion, wooooooooo, there's like parallels and themes, wooooooooooooo.

  • "it comforts people". kind of like religion

  • Jesus Christ only lives in a realm where anything is possible....its called the imagination

  • @theELUSIV Absolutely correct.

  • Derren is alot brighter than that ignorant big head

  • That camera man is getting on my fuhquin nerves!!!

  • Folie a deux- sounds like physiotherapists et cetera

  • Agree with highcolletor and KrisofskiKabui ... please read about locking down a camera. Very distracting.

  • @timwarneka The camera is classic "channel 4 cutting edge documentary" camera work. It's intended to give you the illusion of being part of the conversation, but all it does is give you a headache...

  • i feel like one of those cartoons where the person has an angel and a demon on each shoulder - the way the camera work is here. I wonder if i'm the angel or the demon lol

  • why don't they sit down and do this interview lol

  • @tahshin1601 i think richard did it this way to make it feel spontaneous. but we all suspect darren thought up the idea and planted it in richards head.

  • @paulyhart lmao i bet he could make even Dawkins a theist

  • the holocaust didnt happen, they never went to the moon, 9/11 was set up by the government, michael jackson and bin laden are alive and spirits exist. u mad?

  • 5:12 - 5:46 : is he subconsciously giving richard dawkins hints?

  • There's something to be said for not shattering people's illusions. The placebo effect only works if you believe it will, if someone believes they will recover from illness then they're more likely to. If someone really does want to believe in the supernatural and derives comfort and happiness from it, is it right to show them it's fake?

  • @rampageollie You must be even more cynical about humans/life than I. To say showing reality is basically a crime, that's pretty sick. When it comes to medicine: it's medicine, placebo, or fraud. Any placebo calling itself medicine is a fraud, simple as that. As for comfort and happiness, many grab to the bottle for that - pretty much the same deal. While minor delusions can be healthy; large ones, especially mass delusions (like religion and ideology) often end up with disastrous consequences.

  • Why are people slating what Derren Brown does? He has never claimed what he does is magic, far from it. He is a mentalist, he is not Physic nor a magician.

    People attend his shows to see him perform his art and be amazed by the feats he performs, as a normal man.

  • @ryeax23 ? You didn't know that his mental tricks were illusions? You thought they were real?

  • if i have children later i'm not going to tell them

    any fairy story or santa stuff as if it's true

  • This is a career destroying interview for Brown , right?

  • @LogicalStatements1 why do you say that?

  • @MsHojat Because his career is being a hypno psychic mind bending type person and he has just basically told everybody that it's all fake....... in a sense.

  • @LogicalStatements1 yeah except he never really tells people he's too serious. The "communicating with the dead" "service"/act he did was shown on his show that it was fake, he never advertised it as real. People like Chris Angel do tricks, but they don't claim to be supernatural in reality. James Randi is a very famous person who also still does the occasional trick (used to a lot more) and hasn't claimed that it's supernatural abilities, just secret (or not so secret if he reveals) tricks.

  • @LogicalStatements1 Darren Brown is generally all about advertising tricks that play with people's minds, such as subconsciously altering their decisions, reading small tells, or other things. While I think a fair bit of it is a hoax (their explanation how it was done is not the thing they really did), he doesn't really claim to have supernatural abilities, just claims he's is a "mentalist" (mind trickster) if you've heard of that.

  • @MsHojat Yeah but have you ever heard of something getting old? I suppose it isn't career destroying but it is "career narrowing" it will only apply to young minds who know nothing of him but even then kids are getting "older" faster they use the internet and stuff they find out that the mind tricks are all fake at a younger age now so who does derren brown's material appeal to? 6 year olds? lol , babies?

  • @LogicalStatements1 People watch "magic" tricks even though they know it's not real magic. People even love "magic" tricks even though they know it's not magic. Why is that the case? I suppose because they are interesting tricks that challenges the brain and senses. Darren brown is just another one of those acts that don't claim to be magic

  • @MsHojat Yeah maybe with the physical tricks but i was talking about the hypno stuff.

  • @MsHojat And and yeah yeah the physical magic is great but anyone who watches this interview, hears him say that all the mind tricks are fake and then go on to still watch him and enjoy what he does is a retard lol.

  • Comment removed

  • @strangestdude Lol im guessing you read some more of my comments and realized what you said was silly and thats why u deleted it..........

  • @LogicalStatements1 No, it was a spelling mistake. I asked you a question. Did you see it?

  • @strangestdude I did see it mate but i forgot what it is was , i am sorry. Oh wait you said did i actually believe his tricks were true , no i did not , i hope this answers your question.

  • @Skateclark Well only dumb people who haven't seen this interview will fall for his shite now i guess.

  • @LogicalStatements1 have you seen any of his shows? he admit's its all rubbish and everything he does it just "magic", he reveals most of his tricks on other shows too...

  • @Skateclark I guess that's why i mentioned "dumb people" like who the fuck would watch it when they know it is all bullshit? .......... dumb people.

  • @LogicalStatements1 ohh ok, sorry i misread, i still enjoy his work though :D

  • if you think that you can be the projector of the rainbow spectrum u are mistaken you can only be the diamond that reflects it in a new direction

  • Lol stupid people believing in stupid shit. Enjoy your naive bullshit lives.

  • darren brown could challenge any psychic

  • What Richard Dawkins said at 0:24 ??? Someone can help me?

    often start out as a kind of....?

  • @antiteista83 Folie à deux

  • 8:50 if anyone listens to the Alex Jones radio show he does this a lot, he'll listen to a guest or caller then be like "YA YA I KNEW THAT" and iterate it back to them lol.

  • for the amount of time they talk and the great things they discuss, i think they should have sat down.... just sayin'.....

  • Derren is a legend

  • @OBSIDIANdubstep I think I've heard that legend told before.

    It's the one about the bearded man who felled dragons and slaughtered kings simply by banging his fist on a table and saying "You ARE already dead!"

  • @thinkalott33 ah, yes! The holy spirit... Kind of like the Swiss cheese of supernatural beings. All sorts of holes in that story, ey...

  • For god's sake (pun intended), buy a second camera

  • @highcollector It was made for the program The Enemies of Reason. So it was probably never meant to be viewed in it's entirety like this.

  • @highcollector Amen to that!

  • @highcollector And a tripod

  • @KristofskiKabuki ...And another cameraman, presumably, which would make the production far more expensive. I've got a feeling this is style responding to economics.

  • @highcollector And put 'em both on fucking stands. The camera is constantly swaying and rocking like the poor guy holding it is getting tired of doing so x.x

  • @highcollector ur a hero

  • Thumbs up if your going to type "Psychics" into Youtube search and try figure out how there doing it lol

  • I would love to see Stephen Fry interview Derren

  • richard keeps eye contact constantly, its fantastic

  • MAGICIAN WHO CROSSES OVER TO THE DARK SIDE? Voldemort, Voldemort, o, Voldy, Voldy, Voldy, VOLDEMORT!

  • Wow, people are getting incredibly confused over fact and opinion. The majority expressed is opinion presented as fact. Poor, dogmatic fools.

  • @Wolfhaines I guess i was being a little inaccurate.

    brought back from clinical death is more correct.

    "Clinical death is the medical term for cessation of blood circulation and breathing."

    The point i was trying to make though, albeit jokingly, is still vaild, as science saves people from dying by revival from clinical death on a daily basis and thus preventing "legal death".

    But sometimes poetic language gets a point across in better ways:)

  • Thank you for posting this, richarddawkinsdotnet.

  • WATCH THE ARRIVALS!!

  • I have no problem with those who choose to believe in a god, but the ones who would condemn us for not making that same choice I find destestable.

  • @smoothbanana word:) i do disagree with people who choose to never challenge their beliefs though (be it either a religious, practical or scientific you should always second guess yourself and others:))

  • we spend so much money on science . and some of it we dont even need to no . like what the moon is made out of . or how many planets are there ! we spend billions on things that will not change the way we live . we spend billions of dollars but we have kids going hungry on the streets . what have science done to the heart of a man . we have science but will still love to shed each others blood in war AND ALL JESUS TRIED TO DO WAS BRING HOPE TO A DIEING WORLD ! and they hung him for that .

  • @thinkalott33 What has science done to the heart of man? It has brought us the humility of being the residents of a speck of dust in the vast cosmic sea.

    It has brought us the responsibility of knowing that we are the ones who can best shape our surroundings for the better of all species.

    The problem is that so few people know anything about it because they'd rather believe in superstitions. and thus leave this responsibility in the hands of gods instead of taking it themselves.

  • @thinkalott33 Secondly, your fail to recognize the ripple effect science can have on other fields.

    F.EX: Quantum mechanics is the science of really small particles like electrons and atoms, completely useless on its own, but it predicted that silicon would be a good conductor, which resulted in the silicon microchip in your computer.

    So without knowledge of stuff so small you cant see it, you wouldn't be able to write on your computer. you see how all knowledge is important?

  • @thinkalott33 however I do agree that money is not being used correctly. But i dont think science is where we should make the cuts. Science is the best method of finding ways of making enough food for everyone, productivity in farming has tripled last 100 years thanks to science.

    We could cut in military expenses, we could say that no man should be allowed to own more than 50 million dollars, we could do 100 things... but i don't think cutting science is the right path, sorry...

  • @codexdelux people were living way before high tec science was formed . like anything science has it,s good . and its bad . like all of the bombs we have . just as well as we can cure people . we can aslo use science to spread diseases . science is a good thing . but most people are using it to go around God . thats when science becomes bad . when you start to say we have science . so we dont need God !

  • @thinkalott33 your argument is flawed observe:)

    people were living way before Religion was formed . like anything religion has it's good . and its bad . like all of the suicide bombs we have. Just as well as it can comfort people . we can also use religion to spread ignorance . religion is a good thing . but most people are using it to expolit others and selfishness . thats when religion becomes bad . when you start to say we have God . so we dont need Science!

  • @thinkalott33 (countinued) as you can see when i shuffle the words in your argument to go against religion instead its basically saying, everything has its good stuff and its bad stuff. and then you focus on all the bad.

    and a correction: I never said we don't need a god, I'm saying i don't believe there exists or ever has existed any god (NONE:) Presumably you dont believe in Zeus or Odin either).

    continues in next:)

  • @thinkalott33 @thinkalott33 -- Me not needing for a god has nothing to do with science, it has to do with not believing in a god to begin with.

    I dont see why i should believe either since the bible (or other religious manuscript) are obviously written by men, you can tell just by reading.

    Science and religion are so immensely separate as can be.

    One does not rule out the other.

    But i don't feel i need anything that doesn't exist, unicorns, fairy's or gods.

  • @codexdelux so tell me my friend is life a fairy tail ? we no that this is real . and to say that God is not real in side of a real world . lets get real . were here for a reason . we just dont get old a wither away like the sand on a beach . love ,hate ,pain, were all of this come from . are these real emotions . or there just singles from the brain . or is all of this coming from the heart . whats wrong with saying some one made all of this .

  • @thinkalott33 Whats wrong with saying someone made all this is that you cannot know that. You assume that a god must have made it, because we humans have a tendency to presume that stuff is created. I think its because we're toolmakers. Just because the stuff we create has a reason or a purpose doesn't mean that everything has to be created in this same way.

    But the way i see it

    You see a creation. (i presume)

    I see an Existence.

    and that basically the core of where we disagree.

  • @codexdelux i love this comment . this is the best comment yet . you said it . but realy take time to think . how can anything be made with out some one thinking . how can anything form it self .. can my car blow up . and come back together in it,s perfect form ? you have to be blind . if you dont see that the human body is clearly a design . because anytime there is a design . there is a what ! a copy of that design . how many copys are there of the human body ? i rest my case ....

  • @thinkalott33 I would'nt rest to long i'm afraid. but i can tell that this is a 500+ character answer since i'm going to have to revisit alot of science from school to explain a few things, im just gonna send you a personal message since writing 20 500 lettered snippets will be a bit cumbersome:)

  • look at man and his foolish heart . he loves to be stooped and evil at the same time . he loves war . he loves the smell of another mans dieing flesh ! how can we trust the heart of a man . even i no that i can not trust my self . because i no my heart is wicked . how cam we trust man . when he will take more money then he needs and watch the children go hungry in the streets . how can i trust the heart of a man . only a fool would put his trust in a man .

  • Listen carefully, kids:

    4:00 to 4:47 is the most important part of this video.

  • what a clever man derren is

  • 1:38-2:30 has some stuff that I think might apply well to many successful preachers.

  • Stop fighting.

    Everyone's faith is different.

    Some people are Atheists or scientists, and demand evidence for everything. Some are more curious and open to consider the possiblities of a higher power. Some firmly believe in their deity and believe all others are wrong.

    The greater one in the battle is not the one with the most evidence, the most faith or the most followers. The greater person is the one with the most understanding of their faith and respect to others who do not.

  • @QuirkyGirl12345 Some people are right and some are wrong. If you actually care about truth, it does matter whether your beliefs represent reality or not. If you are wrong, it does not help much when you understand your faith, you will still be wrong. The only reliable tool we know to discover reality is evidence.

  • @QuirkyGirl12345 Believing in bullshit isn't having an open mind. It's being a credulous nitwit.

    If your mind was as open as you lie that yours is, you would actually look at the evidence, even if it goes against your bullshit delusion.

    If your mind was as open as you say it was, you would believe EVERYTHING you hear. You'd believe that pink unicorns, Santa, Vishnu, Thor and Zeus are all real. You don't though, and you know it. That makes you not only a liar, but also a hypocrite.

  • @QuirkyGirl12345

    So we all have different "faiths'" and they're all equal eh?

    I'll remember that next time a quranjockey blows up a school or a biblemaggot thinks abortion should be outlawed etc.

    Grow up, policor clownette.

    Life isn't a Disney™-movie

  • @fatlardass2000  how did i no you would say that . you no why ? because you think like a common man . dont you no that when the bible was wrote these people was writing in the Spirit . so when a man is teaching the word of God . he is teaching in the spirit . so this teaching is no coming from the heart of man . but from the spirit of God .

  • I wonder if Richard is aware how uncomfortable his constant eye contact makes people. Watch how often Derren breaks contact and uses big hand gestures. That bright, inquisitive regard is a bit disconcerting.

  • IN LIFE I HAVE COME TO LURN THAT SOME THINGS ARE NOT COMPLEX . BUT WE ON THE OTHER HAND MAKE THINGS SEEM TO BE MORE COMPLEX THEN WHAT THEY REALY ARE . WHAT GOOD DO INTELLIGENTS DO FOR A MAN . IF HE BECOMES SO SMART . THAT HE BECOMES DUM . AND ARROGANT ! IT STARTS TO CLOUD HIS JUDGMENT . AND HE BEGINS TO PUT TO MUCH TRUST IN HIS OWN THINKING . THAT,S WHY IT IS BETTER TO BE HUMBLE AND WISE . AND TO READ THE WORD OF GOD . WE ALREADY NO THAT SOME OF THE MOST INTELLIGENT HAS THIS WORLD MESSED UP !

  • I wanted derren to do a demonstration on Dawkins. It would have been the greatest thing ever.

  • who the fuck was the cameraman!?

  • @cack1234 Yer Maw...

  • Jesus loves all you guys

  • where is your concrete proof or evidence that there is a magical man in the sky (god)

  • @MrGiovannischiavone shut the fuck up. im tired of the broken record arguments (from both sides)

  • @MrIlikebigdick so fuck off this site cunt

  • Epic camera angles!

  • @F0A0Y0N0U0S I've ALWAYS loved the cameramen for Dawkin's shows and interviews.. I mean like in the one with Ted Haggard (funny as fuck/annoying as fuck, depends on how you take nutjobs, watch it!) or the one with Alister McGrath

  • why is part 3 blocked in London????

  • @AstroMike314 He's probably an absolutist, "my believes are absolute and should apply universally"...tsk tsk...may s/he live his delusion. Beyond rescue.

  • The Camera Work is horrendous. Just Horrible.

  • @EricSmyth14 Not important I'd say. The content is far more important.

  • @EricSmyth14 i like it,makes the interview more raw and real