That picture of the body or his body whatever was just a clip taken from The Magical Mystery Tour movie, it was suppose to be headless they cut it out, although I don't know whose body it is
The coincidence of the whole,"Pepper" thing, done in 1964, I mean, this is an amazing coincidence. I was hoping you might have audio from the Pepperpots LP.
Weird stuff.
It never seems to end. Just more and more questions that never seem to be answered.
@dunskie Yes I agree with you. It just gets weirder and weirder when you start investigating the death of Paul McCartney. I have put out a song with Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots now so you can hear how they sounded.
I believe you. The body language of the band changed. The White album was everyones solo album. Everyone stopped taking Paul seriously I believe. The only one knighted. It is not that hard to pass off Beatle copies. Look at the Turtles Birds Weezer.
The real Paul died November 9, 1965 on a 'stupid bloody Tuesday' (I am the Walrus). Everyone is off by one year. The album that was the first with Faul was 'Rubber Soul'. There are clearly differences between the two in height, eye color, voice, but most of all the chin. The real Paul had a rounder face and chin, while Faul's is angular and longer. It obviously was tormenting John to keep it secret for so many years, which is why he gave so many clues.
At 2:43, it says tha "Bill Shepherd" Wrote some songs but was NEVER as good or talented than Paul...so the fake Paul, who co-wrote those awesome songs on Sgt Pepper, songs on the MMT lp, White album, Abbey Road and Let It Be is a fake???Ridiculous!!
paul mccartney may not be dead we all change from age to age from likke ten to thirteen and then from then to sixteen then to nineten then to fifttyis then sixtyis so on ect but not as much as the paul does know and then from 66 on
paul mccartney may not be dead we all change from age to age from likke ten to thirteen and then from then to sixteen then to nineten then to fifttyis then sixtyis so on ect
The whole 'paul is dead' is a heck of story and very compelling to read. (I love reading stuff on it, its became the ultimate urban myth.) That doesn't however make it true, especially when I see photos for different angles with different facial expressions and weight gain being touted as 'proof'.
@davidioanfan ''Because I could argue that you're the dumbasses for not seeing that Paul's been replaced with a double.'' ......seriously? people who think hes alive are dumasses? and people who think hes dead are the smart ones? seriously man or woman, your taking the hype too litterally. hes alive.
Okay, exactly WHY are you comparing pictures of him from now, when he's In his late 60's, to pictures from when he was In his mid or late 20's? Kind of a large age difference, don't you think? So, since he's an old man now, there's going to be differences In his looks. You don't seriously think he'd be the exact same looking as he was back In '63 or so, do you? Moron. -_-
it's kind of silly to take pictures of him when he is around 21 22 and compare them to pics nearly ten years later, we all look different in that amound of time, fuck
Paul is alive. People change! Their hairstyles, weight, facial expressions, height, styles. No one is going to look exactly the same year to year. I would like you to put a picture of yourself up to another one from 3 years ago and see how much of a difference there is. With love
@TheBeatlessssss You're totally right! Not even I looked the same from 5 to 6 years old, and I don't think people change a lot in that time. All in all it's a nice comparison to do - even old people change a lot in 10 years (and I'm not talking about the wrinkles lol.)
Here is where I'm confused. I'm trying to reconcile Bill Shepherd and his band with the story of the guy (William Campbell?) who came over from Canada who was supposedly an Ontario policeman. Is it possible that it's the same man?
And where did you get the picture of the headless body? And what about the picture of the "Paul" whose head was blown open in the car crash? Is it the same body?
I just have to say in final theory...it is obvious there have been others being presented as Paul McCartney. There is one who is obviously a larger boned man & tall...& another one who more resembles Paul with respect to bodilty frame size, such as in interview recently with David Letterman. Another curious thing is the twin freaks album release & all the weird art on front album cover. Just an observation though.
question: If Paul dies in 1966 and is replaced by an imposter doesn't that mean that his imposter is more talented than the original Paul McCartney because he did Pepper, White Album, Abbey Road, Wings, etc. Just a thought.
Gee - the REAL Paul's family must have been incredibly understanding when it came to someone else pretending to be their lost loved one. And to think that the record companies never tried this again with the likes of Elvis and Kurt Cobain?? Why not? They could have continued making money there too.
I don't have enough of a character count remaining to type all of the reasons why this whole "Paul is dead" thing is a load of crap...
Havent your released yet these people dont do it for the money they do it because they can. And yes they have done it before and after but this situation was unique because it was the first time they did it with a pop star.
What you don't realize is that the Beatles were controlled by the Tavistock Institute and other powerful people. Therefore, Paul's family had no choice when they were told, say, to pose for a picture with the double or to appear in a short film with him (which is somewhere here on YT), It wasn't a matter of their understanding it or liking it. They would have been in danger if they said anything or didn't cooperate with the double.
I must say the picture of the beheaded body is pretty creepy, if not gross if that's what you said it was. At least we know the Beatles were into a little sublimital messageing
The best way to deal with these conspiracy fools is to just accept them as a form of entertainment. Even if 'the real Paul' had died in 1966, that would mean that everything 'the fake Paul' has recorded since then has all been by one really talented guy who's been entertaining us far longer than that supposedly long-dead moptop ('croptop'?). 'Sgt. Pepper', 'Abbey Road', 'Band On The Run', 'Tug Of War', 'Flaming Pie', and 'Chaos And Creation In The Backyard' are all "Legends Of The Faul".
So, again, I ask you to back up your statements and show me how the scientific method has been faulty thus far. Show me which particular scientific arguments are groundless. Show me which cases of study did not follow the scientific method and instead followed their bias. Or show me how the scientific method itself is biased towards the official story.
You don't have any understanding of how scientific arguments are made. I might suggest reading one peer-reviewed scientific journal to find out. Their articles show precisely how the scientific method is followed in every article. If one person in the world can prove how the method has been used incorrectly, then the hypothesis is not accepted. It has nothing to do with being there when they meet, which anyone with the slightest understanding of scientific study would know.
Perhaps you can prove how every scientific body in the world is "Establishment propaganda". In doing so, you would have to show precisely how the scientific method was not followed (which you can't) or if you can't prove that, show precisely how the scientific method (which has existed for around a thousand years) is propaganda. Once you do that, then you can discuss it. If you can't do that, then you really have zero right to comment on it given that you don't know anything about it.
Yes, I consider the PID/PWR subject to be nonsense but the subject of conspiracy theorists and theories is quite an interesting one, which I follow with a great deal of interest. Again, my position on 9/11 happens to be the same as every scientific body in the world. There has yet to be one paper in the CT realm that has followed the minimal standards of evidence. As anyone with a brain knows, you can't conduct serious scientific experiments by looking at pictures over the internet.
Your statement was: "I understand reluctance not to get carried away but those photos!" Given that some of the photos undermine the thesis of the video, then I would suggest re-thinking your praise of such a video.
Yes, one should focus on the mistake because it makes one realizes just how easy it is for you to be duped by these sorts of clues. The mistake puts into question the whole method, so it only makes sense to focus on it.
Maybe they deny it because your evidence contradicts your claims, as it does here. If Paul died on 9/11/66, then why do you praise a video for comparing two pictures that were taken before that date (0:58)? Again, when you have shown yourself again and again to not know what you are talking about, then your choice is to either reconsider your position or continue living in your dream world.
Once again, you have shown that in using photographs you could prove that just about everybody in the world was replaced - that's just the nature of photography. The "With The Beatles" picture comparison is comparing two pictures of supposedly pre-replaced Paul. Have we changed the date, or is this just more proof that you people don't know what you're talking about?
That picture of the body or his body whatever was just a clip taken from The Magical Mystery Tour movie, it was suppose to be headless they cut it out, although I don't know whose body it is
theboywhokills 4 months ago
The coincidence of the whole,"Pepper" thing, done in 1964, I mean, this is an amazing coincidence. I was hoping you might have audio from the Pepperpots LP.
Weird stuff.
It never seems to end. Just more and more questions that never seem to be answered.
dunskie 5 months ago
@dunskie Yes I agree with you. It just gets weirder and weirder when you start investigating the death of Paul McCartney. I have put out a song with Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots now so you can hear how they sounded.
Robert80z 5 months ago
first he died in 1969, then in 1966 and now in 1965. for christ's sake, what will you say next, that paul mccartney never existed?
lilikaberry96 6 months ago
The one and only Billy Sheers.
redrey718619 7 months ago
I believe you. The body language of the band changed. The White album was everyones solo album. Everyone stopped taking Paul seriously I believe. The only one knighted. It is not that hard to pass off Beatle copies. Look at the Turtles Birds Weezer.
redrey718619 7 months ago
HE AINT DEAD HIS BODY MATURED OVER TIME YOU COCK.
PaulTenantry 8 months ago
The real Paul died November 9, 1965 on a 'stupid bloody Tuesday' (I am the Walrus). Everyone is off by one year. The album that was the first with Faul was 'Rubber Soul'. There are clearly differences between the two in height, eye color, voice, but most of all the chin. The real Paul had a rounder face and chin, while Faul's is angular and longer. It obviously was tormenting John to keep it secret for so many years, which is why he gave so many clues.
TinaLHopkins 8 months ago
im not sure this is rite but i agree on the nose
speedking186 9 months ago
Wait a minute, where did you find that picture of Paul's dead body? I haven't seen that before and now I'm intrigued..
Matrix803 9 months ago
At 2:43, it says tha "Bill Shepherd" Wrote some songs but was NEVER as good or talented than Paul...so the fake Paul, who co-wrote those awesome songs on Sgt Pepper, songs on the MMT lp, White album, Abbey Road and Let It Be is a fake???Ridiculous!!
TheCatwoman61 9 months ago
okay kohn sing ide love to turn you on.. if you play number 9 backwards it says turn me on dead man. that correct.
thus meaning that john is dead right. Anyways the point is paul isnt dead
langerguitarboy 1 year ago
paul mccartney may not be dead we all change from age to age from likke ten to thirteen and then from then to sixteen then to nineten then to fifttyis then sixtyis so on ect but not as much as the paul does know and then from 66 on
gingeroni8 1 year ago
paul mccartney may not be dead we all change from age to age from likke ten to thirteen and then from then to sixteen then to nineten then to fifttyis then sixtyis so on ect
gingeroni8 1 year ago
0:51 Ring think "Oh no... again!"
EvilMisha 1 year ago
So you made one picture comparison. Whoo Hoo! Mystery solved! Not a very compelling video...
toasteroven427 1 year ago
The whole 'paul is dead' is a heck of story and very compelling to read. (I love reading stuff on it, its became the ultimate urban myth.) That doesn't however make it true, especially when I see photos for different angles with different facial expressions and weight gain being touted as 'proof'.
AlicelnWonderIand 1 year ago
bullshit
AlicelnWonderIand 1 year ago
what is the first song ?? before "You've Got To Hide your Love Away" ?
sk8rboi71 1 year ago
@sk8rboi71
It's Blue Jay Way off of Magical Mystery Tour
toasteroven427 1 year ago
geoge martin took over pauls place as a musician in the beatles and thats why the music became so differnt
lowaces 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@davidioanfan ''Because I could argue that you're the dumbasses for not seeing that Paul's been replaced with a double.'' ......seriously? people who think hes alive are dumasses? and people who think hes dead are the smart ones? seriously man or woman, your taking the hype too litterally. hes alive.
beatlesboyseventeen 1 year ago
how could he die if he was on the x factor last year :S
bboywolfy 1 year ago
@davidioanfan I think he is alive, I just don't leave rude comments. I watch these videos to see how many 'clues' people can find.
ashleeg9711 1 year ago
Okay, exactly WHY are you comparing pictures of him from now, when he's In his late 60's, to pictures from when he was In his mid or late 20's? Kind of a large age difference, don't you think? So, since he's an old man now, there's going to be differences In his looks. You don't seriously think he'd be the exact same looking as he was back In '63 or so, do you? Moron. -_-
MiriamSaka17 1 year ago
i still think the replacement came from a band called denny and the diplomats and they reunited wth wings denny and phil ackrill
DCAreaguy2001 1 year ago
it's kind of silly to take pictures of him when he is around 21 22 and compare them to pics nearly ten years later, we all look different in that amound of time, fuck
snoogans999 1 year ago
The guy's alive and still ROCKS!!
billace90 1 year ago
"sexy shady (s)he´s the latest and the greatiest of them all...sexy shady what have u done? u made a fool of everyone"
121maddin 2 years ago
1:31 :Q______ *ç* Muahahhaha Paul is live and mine. U_U
MrsPaulMcCartney96 2 years ago
Paul is alive. People change! Their hairstyles, weight, facial expressions, height, styles. No one is going to look exactly the same year to year. I would like you to put a picture of yourself up to another one from 3 years ago and see how much of a difference there is. With love
TheBeatlessssss 2 years ago
@TheBeatlessssss You're totally right! Not even I looked the same from 5 to 6 years old, and I don't think people change a lot in that time. All in all it's a nice comparison to do - even old people change a lot in 10 years (and I'm not talking about the wrinkles lol.)
lilikaberry96 6 months ago
PAUL Is NOT DEAD
Twisted4000 2 years ago 15
@Twisted4000 We shouldkick these PID-ers' ASSES back to the looney farm!!
TheCatwoman61 9 months ago
@Twisted4000 YOU ARE DEAD YA DUMBO! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
dylankaan2002 3 weeks ago
@dylankaan2002 Oh wow that comment is two years old. O_O
Twisted4000 3 weeks ago
get a job!....you idiot!...put a fucking picture of you 5 years ago and put another one of this year and you'll notice.....you re dead!!!!....asshole
alemaldonado 2 years ago
Here is where I'm confused. I'm trying to reconcile Bill Shepherd and his band with the story of the guy (William Campbell?) who came over from Canada who was supposedly an Ontario policeman. Is it possible that it's the same man?
And where did you get the picture of the headless body? And what about the picture of the "Paul" whose head was blown open in the car crash? Is it the same body?
xander7ful 2 years ago
and how is it that the *fake* paul is left handed too? there really is no such thing as an EXACT look alike
DoomGuy11 2 years ago
whats up with all the thumbs down on all the right answers? PAUL IS NOT DEAD PEOPLE!!
DoomGuy11 2 years ago
people get hurt and olt dumbass that's why he looks different
AndrewOlsonTV 2 years ago
the greatest genius of 20th century music was and will be forever John Lennon! And Paul is not dead!
phazoneatermetroid77 2 years ago
I just have to say in final theory...it is obvious there have been others being presented as Paul McCartney. There is one who is obviously a larger boned man & tall...& another one who more resembles Paul with respect to bodilty frame size, such as in interview recently with David Letterman. Another curious thing is the twin freaks album release & all the weird art on front album cover. Just an observation though.
rocnrollurisback 2 years ago
question: If Paul dies in 1966 and is replaced by an imposter doesn't that mean that his imposter is more talented than the original Paul McCartney because he did Pepper, White Album, Abbey Road, Wings, etc. Just a thought.
bseenmedia2 2 years ago
actually, pauls supposed imposter was william campbell shears. and where the heck did that picture of pauls beheaaded body come from?
iamanubnub 2 years ago
the picture at 2:07 is pauls passport photo,
he did that so that he could go away and not be a beatle for a while,
so it says in the anthology.
Jesscabisstt 2 years ago
paul mccartney is obviously dead, you fools.
WilliamShearsCampbel 2 years ago
lol, nice username.
iamanubnub 2 years ago
Gee - the REAL Paul's family must have been incredibly understanding when it came to someone else pretending to be their lost loved one. And to think that the record companies never tried this again with the likes of Elvis and Kurt Cobain?? Why not? They could have continued making money there too.
I don't have enough of a character count remaining to type all of the reasons why this whole "Paul is dead" thing is a load of crap...
katie8758 2 years ago 5
Havent your released yet these people dont do it for the money they do it because they can. And yes they have done it before and after but this situation was unique because it was the first time they did it with a pop star.
Robert80z 2 years ago
What you don't realize is that the Beatles were controlled by the Tavistock Institute and other powerful people. Therefore, Paul's family had no choice when they were told, say, to pose for a picture with the double or to appear in a short film with him (which is somewhere here on YT), It wasn't a matter of their understanding it or liking it. They would have been in danger if they said anything or didn't cooperate with the double.
xander7ful 2 years ago
at the pic of the head, hin the begining he couldve just grown hair
gcater2009 2 years ago 2
I must say the picture of the beheaded body is pretty creepy, if not gross if that's what you said it was. At least we know the Beatles were into a little sublimital messageing
KRAZYCorps 3 years ago
The best way to deal with these conspiracy fools is to just accept them as a form of entertainment. Even if 'the real Paul' had died in 1966, that would mean that everything 'the fake Paul' has recorded since then has all been by one really talented guy who's been entertaining us far longer than that supposedly long-dead moptop ('croptop'?). 'Sgt. Pepper', 'Abbey Road', 'Band On The Run', 'Tug Of War', 'Flaming Pie', and 'Chaos And Creation In The Backyard' are all "Legends Of The Faul".
reverendflash 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
paul mccartney is obviously dead, you fools.
WilliamShearsCampbel 3 years ago
so right...
WORSHIPxCHAOS 2 years ago
whats the name of the song at the beggining?
refek1 3 years ago
blue jay way
thepablofanquesfair 3 years ago
Weones de mierda no salvan a nadie
felizuko16 3 years ago
a nice job
sanguine111 3 years ago
So, again, I ask you to back up your statements and show me how the scientific method has been faulty thus far. Show me which particular scientific arguments are groundless. Show me which cases of study did not follow the scientific method and instead followed their bias. Or show me how the scientific method itself is biased towards the official story.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
You don't have any understanding of how scientific arguments are made. I might suggest reading one peer-reviewed scientific journal to find out. Their articles show precisely how the scientific method is followed in every article. If one person in the world can prove how the method has been used incorrectly, then the hypothesis is not accepted. It has nothing to do with being there when they meet, which anyone with the slightest understanding of scientific study would know.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
dumbest fucking thing I've ever seen
hangover71 3 years ago
Perhaps you can prove how every scientific body in the world is "Establishment propaganda". In doing so, you would have to show precisely how the scientific method was not followed (which you can't) or if you can't prove that, show precisely how the scientific method (which has existed for around a thousand years) is propaganda. Once you do that, then you can discuss it. If you can't do that, then you really have zero right to comment on it given that you don't know anything about it.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Yes, I consider the PID/PWR subject to be nonsense but the subject of conspiracy theorists and theories is quite an interesting one, which I follow with a great deal of interest. Again, my position on 9/11 happens to be the same as every scientific body in the world. There has yet to be one paper in the CT realm that has followed the minimal standards of evidence. As anyone with a brain knows, you can't conduct serious scientific experiments by looking at pictures over the internet.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Your statement was: "I understand reluctance not to get carried away but those photos!" Given that some of the photos undermine the thesis of the video, then I would suggest re-thinking your praise of such a video.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Yes, one should focus on the mistake because it makes one realizes just how easy it is for you to be duped by these sorts of clues. The mistake puts into question the whole method, so it only makes sense to focus on it.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Maybe they deny it because your evidence contradicts your claims, as it does here. If Paul died on 9/11/66, then why do you praise a video for comparing two pictures that were taken before that date (0:58)? Again, when you have shown yourself again and again to not know what you are talking about, then your choice is to either reconsider your position or continue living in your dream world.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
The best hoax ever! I can,t believe a lot of people fell for it in those days. PAUL IS STILL WITH US! There is evidence.
wtonckens 3 years ago 2
Once again, you have shown that in using photographs you could prove that just about everybody in the world was replaced - that's just the nature of photography. The "With The Beatles" picture comparison is comparing two pictures of supposedly pre-replaced Paul. Have we changed the date, or is this just more proof that you people don't know what you're talking about?
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
nice job
yesitruth 3 years ago