@SevenLivesManyFaces : You're right. I've said many times that calling it Starchild was a mistake. We did it in the first week we had it, and we were not thinking ahead with it. If I had one major do-over with this, I would have tried for a more "neutral" name.
@SuzLa1 : No, not computer generated, but you can see several drawings by various artists on the Starchild Project website, and Bill Munns created a sculpture for the History Channel that can be seen on Youtube.
Simply because certain phenotypic features are missing and others are different does not prove that this skull is of alien origin.What matters are genetics and I'd venture to say that this skull is not much different than say yours or mines,genetically.This skull is most likely the skull of someone with certain genetic mutations that were isolated in the parts of wherever the skull was found demonstrating why it isn't more common,it could even be an adaptation to perhaps sparse nutrition.
@Btony09 : You're obviously new to the Starchild's case. Earlier this year it's nuclear DNA was recovered in small portions, a few hundred strings of base pairs ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand long. Several were from the human genome, and several are not found in the massive NIH database, meaning not found on Earth. So regardless of what you think, you're wrong.
would like to see plastecine facial reconstruction on this skull, im in the belief thats its a space traveller because of the g-forces thats skull texture has taken on - due to the forces placed on the bone mass. Its seems supernatural. my second hypothesis its hybrid and has been physically grown in a horizontal position due to its week limbs and flattening of its skull.
I personally feel like you just can`t trust Nasa or any space organizations Data.
It`s not hard to see that they want to control everything about what we think and feel about outer space & our cosmos. Two 1/2 years ago when I first read your statment qout: everything we know is wrong?
Yes, I've heard that thought problem about the baby carried to term in space. I don't believe it, though. I think it would be a normal human baby (assuming both parents were human, etc.) It would just have a lot fewer physical restrictions placed upon it, at least at first.
@OfficialLloydPye If the human responds to gravity like plants do then gravity is required to challenge our bodies to form the muscle/bone strength. Without the presence of gravitational pull/challenge the body would not only have significant embryonic difficulties its post development would be almost unpredictable. I'm guessing this was done almost immediately after developing easy reach into the outer atmosphere and orbit. Heck thats 60yrs by now...! Who knows what horrors/successes have been
2Cont: documented...! If we could somehow predict and/or control the development of a human in 0-G we will by default begin a new type of hominid without what we currently define as natural evolution/mutation. Even with our meddling It is still nature so we cant call it a brand new species because it is 100% us, no cross-pollination or splicing more like a forced race of humans. Here comes the fun stuff. = D.. What if in the distant past say oh... 3-5 global communities ago Cont:
3Cont: we were discovered by alien visitors, would they began to learn, tweak, and ready us for interstellar travel? First they have to learn our basics food, water environment. Then our physiology reproduction, nutrition, molecular make-up and cellular intricacies. With that as a platform they could begin to in this case lighten, strengthen and modify us to need little and cope the forces of travel. What if Starchild is an un-recovered or modern remain of the ancestor of those modified men..?
@lemmyliquor 4Cont: Not an alien at all by definition but a modification through gene tampering, turning on recessives and such. Maybe they have synthetic they wove into our structure to create the lighter stronger framework and those are your unknown dna hits....! Much like mature native cultures refined earthenware to become thinner and stronger through experience and technology ''they'' may have simply re arranged us and introduced a new fiber to fill in the spaces left while De-bulking us.
I now understand it to be most of the bone loss will come back after their return to earth but not all of it.
Some astronauts have premanently lost as much as 8% based on the lenght of their stay in space.
He follow up with the theory, if a woman carried a child 9 months to term and gave birth in space it may not even be able to return to earth phyically normal for our earths gravity.
Clnm: I knew about the loss of bone density in astronauts, but I did not know that it never returns. I think that is doubtful, in fact. You son might not have his facts straight on that one. But whether true or not, yes, certainly that might have a role in explaining why the Starchild would need such dense, extraordinarily hard bone. It would certainly make sense....
@OfficialLloydPye What kind of science is this? Are you seriously engaging in a dialogue about bone mineralization when you don't even have th foggiest idea about science? And somehow you have the audacity to stand up in front of a camera and talk as an expert? Are you for real pal?
Bottle: The closest representation will probably be the new sculpture that will be created for the TV show "MonsterQuest." They will be doing a segment about the Starchild in the next couple of months, so look for it on TV in January or so.....
It's called "Starchild" because at first we thought it was a child, and we thought that it might be the skull of an alien. Later we found out it wasn't a child, it's actually a human-alien hybrid rather than a pure alien.
A poor facial reconstruction was done by the "UFO Hunters" TV show. A new and probably much better one will soon be made by "MonsterQuest," which we'll be on in a couple of months. As for it being a vegetarian.....I have no idea about that, but I doubt it.
people would show more interest if it weren't called star child.
SevenLivesManyFaces 3 months ago
@SevenLivesManyFaces : You're right. I've said many times that calling it Starchild was a mistake. We did it in the first week we had it, and we were not thinking ahead with it. If I had one major do-over with this, I would have tried for a more "neutral" name.
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago
I've looking around and I found this
watch?v=omm8Ey8vwbg&feature=related
at 1:51. It looks somewhat simar to the Starchild, but it IS different..........Just thought I'd share I suppose.
miguelsz2 11 months ago
@miguelsz2 : Yes, that's interesting but not like the Starchild. Thanks!
OfficialLloydPye 11 months ago
Have you made any computer generated images of what it might have looked like when it was alive?
SuzLa1 1 year ago
@SuzLa1 : No, not computer generated, but you can see several drawings by various artists on the Starchild Project website, and Bill Munns created a sculpture for the History Channel that can be seen on Youtube.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
Simply because certain phenotypic features are missing and others are different does not prove that this skull is of alien origin.What matters are genetics and I'd venture to say that this skull is not much different than say yours or mines,genetically.This skull is most likely the skull of someone with certain genetic mutations that were isolated in the parts of wherever the skull was found demonstrating why it isn't more common,it could even be an adaptation to perhaps sparse nutrition.
Btony09 1 year ago
@Btony09 : You're obviously new to the Starchild's case. Earlier this year it's nuclear DNA was recovered in small portions, a few hundred strings of base pairs ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand long. Several were from the human genome, and several are not found in the massive NIH database, meaning not found on Earth. So regardless of what you think, you're wrong.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
To end, Was this skull found in a cave in mexico and was it hidden or used as an artifact ? I am now a new fan of your Your channel. Many Thanks
crimsoncoin 1 year ago
would like to see plastecine facial reconstruction on this skull, im in the belief thats its a space traveller because of the g-forces thats skull texture has taken on - due to the forces placed on the bone mass. Its seems supernatural. my second hypothesis its hybrid and has been physically grown in a horizontal position due to its week limbs and flattening of its skull.
crimsoncoin 1 year ago
@crimsoncoin Good ideas.
SuzLa1 1 year ago
Clnm: Of course RNA is different from DNA. Google both and you'll easily find a description of those differences.
OfficialLloydPye 2 years ago
Yeah..Lloyd I know what you feel..
I personally feel like you just can`t trust Nasa or any space organizations Data.
It`s not hard to see that they want to control everything about what we think and feel about outer space & our cosmos. Two 1/2 years ago when I first read your statment qout: everything we know is wrong?
I thought, this guy is crazy..LOL
Today? I totally understand what you mean.
What is your take on RNA?
Is it different that DNA?
And if it is why?
clnmyjts 2 years ago 2
Yes, I've heard that thought problem about the baby carried to term in space. I don't believe it, though. I think it would be a normal human baby (assuming both parents were human, etc.) It would just have a lot fewer physical restrictions placed upon it, at least at first.
OfficialLloydPye 2 years ago
@OfficialLloydPye If the human responds to gravity like plants do then gravity is required to challenge our bodies to form the muscle/bone strength. Without the presence of gravitational pull/challenge the body would not only have significant embryonic difficulties its post development would be almost unpredictable. I'm guessing this was done almost immediately after developing easy reach into the outer atmosphere and orbit. Heck thats 60yrs by now...! Who knows what horrors/successes have been
lemmyliquor 1 year ago
Comment removed
lemmyliquor 1 year ago
2Cont: documented...! If we could somehow predict and/or control the development of a human in 0-G we will by default begin a new type of hominid without what we currently define as natural evolution/mutation. Even with our meddling It is still nature so we cant call it a brand new species because it is 100% us, no cross-pollination or splicing more like a forced race of humans. Here comes the fun stuff. = D.. What if in the distant past say oh... 3-5 global communities ago Cont:
lemmyliquor 1 year ago
3Cont: we were discovered by alien visitors, would they began to learn, tweak, and ready us for interstellar travel? First they have to learn our basics food, water environment. Then our physiology reproduction, nutrition, molecular make-up and cellular intricacies. With that as a platform they could begin to in this case lighten, strengthen and modify us to need little and cope the forces of travel. What if Starchild is an un-recovered or modern remain of the ancestor of those modified men..?
lemmyliquor 1 year ago
@lemmyliquor 4Cont: Not an alien at all by definition but a modification through gene tampering, turning on recessives and such. Maybe they have synthetic they wove into our structure to create the lighter stronger framework and those are your unknown dna hits....! Much like mature native cultures refined earthenware to become thinner and stronger through experience and technology ''they'' may have simply re arranged us and introduced a new fiber to fill in the spaces left while De-bulking us.
lemmyliquor 1 year ago
Hi Lloyd..
I spoke with my son again.
I guess I was the one that missunderstood.
He corrected me,
I now understand it to be most of the bone loss will come back after their return to earth but not all of it.
Some astronauts have premanently lost as much as 8% based on the lenght of their stay in space.
He follow up with the theory, if a woman carried a child 9 months to term and gave birth in space it may not even be able to return to earth phyically normal for our earths gravity.
clnmyjts 2 years ago
Clnm: I knew about the loss of bone density in astronauts, but I did not know that it never returns. I think that is doubtful, in fact. You son might not have his facts straight on that one. But whether true or not, yes, certainly that might have a role in explaining why the Starchild would need such dense, extraordinarily hard bone. It would certainly make sense....
OfficialLloydPye 2 years ago
@OfficialLloydPye What kind of science is this? Are you seriously engaging in a dialogue about bone mineralization when you don't even have th foggiest idea about science? And somehow you have the audacity to stand up in front of a camera and talk as an expert? Are you for real pal?
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
Hi, lloyd
My son Brought something to my attention that I was not aware of.
He was pointing out to me that a astronaut whom spends at least 1 month or more in outer space could lose 8 % of their bone density.
My son also mentioned that this lost of density will not rebuild after their return to earth.
Do you know anything about this?
If so could this apply to your studies of the star child?
clnmyjts 2 years ago
Bottle: The closest representation will probably be the new sculpture that will be created for the TV show "MonsterQuest." They will be doing a segment about the Starchild in the next couple of months, so look for it on TV in January or so.....
OfficialLloydPye 2 years ago
hmmmm.....I will look at the link..I don't know anything about that skull...very interesting.
kissmytwinkys 2 years ago
check out my video response. I think it's the closest representation of what it would look like.
bottleslingguy 2 years ago
It's called "Starchild" because at first we thought it was a child, and we thought that it might be the skull of an alien. Later we found out it wasn't a child, it's actually a human-alien hybrid rather than a pure alien.
OfficialLloydPye 2 years ago
human alien hybrid? How did you come to that conclusion?
kissmytwinkys 2 years ago
Why do you call it a starchild?
2014andBeyonD 2 years ago
A poor facial reconstruction was done by the "UFO Hunters" TV show. A new and probably much better one will soon be made by "MonsterQuest," which we'll be on in a couple of months. As for it being a vegetarian.....I have no idea about that, but I doubt it.
OfficialLloydPye 2 years ago
u should do a facial reconstruction of the skull it would be very interesting to find out what a starchild look like
releaselog 2 years ago
fascinating, keep those videos coming!
shaynehunter 2 years ago
Dose this mean it was vegetarian?
XXTheRealMcCoyXX 2 years ago