Watch Cancer Causing Chemicals Glow in Black Light

[d4earth]

I agree that glowing is not a proof a concern, but in this instance that is what is glowing. Coal tar shampoo had a lawsuit against it to minimize the amount of carcinogens (coal tar) in it.

[uprightcitizen69]

@d4earth It's glowing???? Wow, that is all the proof I need. I know that Austin uses that stupid black light test, which is not a standard test. Is it approved by ASTM? NO!!!

Tom-What is this glowing water suppose to prove

[d4earth]

@upsidedowncitizen69: Sure if you have about $100,000 I'll work with ASTM to make this a standard test.

[Environact]

@d4earth I don't see how you could possibly say that. You just have to simply write out how you perform the test. I suspect the big problem would be that the test would need to be reproducible.

[uprightcitizen69]

@d4earth

Tom-Please cite the case, court and circuit please. I think you are telling a fib. Just level with me I won't tell.

[d4earth]

@upsidedowncitizen69: If you Google "coal tar shampoo lawsuit california" there are about 2200 hits where you can read all about it. 

[Environact]

@d4earth You mean when CA prop 65 labeling issue? Weak.

[d4earth]

@upsidedowncitizen69: If you Google "coal tar shampoo lawsuit california" you will have about 2200 hits where you can read all about it.

[Environact]

@d4earth You mean the Prop 65 labeling issue lawsuit? You should check into this before responding.