Romans 1:20-23 20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Complexity doesn't point to design, it often points to lack of design. If a creator were creating an efficient system, why have multiple layers of symbyosis, why not provide a seperate food supply for all organisms involved instead of the ants having to go out of their way to "insure" the viability of their crops?
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
yes they are unique. there are no others like them. so how did they evolve? everything you described is extremely complex and diverse. there is no way it evolved.
@talons2112 So you believe a talking snake told a woman who was made from the rib of a man to eat a piece of fruit and now your saying thousands of scientists working with a proven method got it all wrong.
@NotEnoughLions yes. have you ever heard of a snake oil salesman? a snake in the grass? a liar? these concepts are hard for you to understand because you not interested in searching for the truth. it always the lone voice and not the mjority that has the truth. the scientists of the day thought galileo was a fool when he was dropping two bodies of different mass from the tower of piza. finally the scientists of the day are not proven any more than they were in the days of galileo
@talons2112 What is hard for me to understand is your level of willful ignorance. Science has doubled your life span and increased crop yields by 800%. You are debating on a computer and enjoy the benefits science has given you and those you care about. How low can you go to support a cult of ignorance?
Why was Jesus sacrificed on a cross to save mankind? Why did Middle Eastern tribes sacrifice animals to change their luck in a practice commonly known as scapegoating?
@NotEnoughLions what is hard for me to understand is why you cant answer a question. science has not extended out lifespan. man does not and will not live past about 120 and people are still starving around the world. my computer was created by engineers like wozniak. so far all i heard were things i think you make up in your head. do you have any facts to back up any of these beliefs?
@NotEnoughLions depends on where they lived and the lifestyle afforded by the environment but i would guess it was much like today. i had a friend that died in the middle of a basketball game when we were 16. then again i have been to grave sites in europe that dated from the 1400's and there were people of all ages buried there much like today. i don't see much difference. but i am still upset over george washington being bled to death by the physicians of his day. man doesnt live past 120
@Helge129 people have always had an average lifespan of 70-80 years for the last 4000 years. we can see this by historical records and graves despite gmo foods, pollution, getting run over by cars, victims of war, murder, disease, being nuked, cigarettes, alcohol, etc....
@talons2112 No, that is simply not correct. The average life span mere 1000 years ago was in the range of anywhere between 20 and 40 years, depending on where and how one lived. Modern medicine has doubled that, and allowed some to live even thrice that.
@Helge129 i have to dissagree. thrice that? i have not seen a gravestone that marks anyone living to 240 years due to science. sure medicine has saved many lives but the most anyone can hope to live for is 120 which seems to be the wall. people start passing around 40-80 something despite some mishap, poor lifestyle, war or disease of which we still have no cure for. no matter what science does we will never see any 200 year old people. it's not in our code.
@talons2112 What was the AVERAGE life span 200 years ago and what is it now? The difference is the advantages science has given to modern medicine and agriculture. Talking about individuals who might live very long or very short lives is your feeble attempt to deflect the conversation and avoid the fact that you religious beliefs have provided nothing and science has been successful. You are a total fail.
@NotEnoughLions georgre washington died at 67 bled to death by a doctor john adams died age 90 thomas jefferson died age 83 aaron burr died age 80 james madison 85 james monroe 73 benjamin franklin 84 john quincy adams 80 andrew jackson 78 martin van buren 79 charles caroll 95 samuel adams 81 william ellery 92 francis lewis 89 robrt paine 83 james smith 87 mathew thorton 89 william williams 80 george wythe 80 none of these people lived to these ages because of your fantasies no change
@NotEnoughLions nice shell game you got going there. i only selected based on names of people you would know and couldnt deny of which the only one effected by science was washington who was bled to death by a sciencetard of his day. but as can plainly see people back 200 years ago lived to the same average age people do today with NO HELP from the advancements of science. furthermore you said the age has doubled and i dont see any 160/180 yo people do you? your fantasy is a total fail
@talons2112 Admit I'm wrong!!!! You are denying the facts. Making up rubbish to support your claims. Average allows for some to live long lives but 200 years ago most people died before they were fifty.
@NotEnoughLions i am not denying any facts. people throughout time have died at all ages. i took the signers of the declaration of independence which are people we all know existed and when living over 200 years ago. one of them i think died when he was 30, the oldest 95, from all of them the average was 67, you can look through any obit today and see the same thing. no change. you claim science has doubled the age i see no evidence of that anywhere or any facts that suggest otherwise. u r wrong
@NotEnoughLions are you saying george washington, thomas jefferson, adams, q adams, and the rest of the signers didnt live and die and that they are just fairy tales? those people that die young are usually to something causal, war, starvation, disease, etc., but not due to age limitation. i had a friend die in a motorcycle accident science did nothing to get him to live to 150. i presented facts it is you ignoring them. admit u r are wrong. its ok u can do it. :) thenwecanmoveonto the nexttopic
@talons2112 The AVERAGE age during the Bronze Age was 26 years. The current world's (including the third world) AVERAGE age (2010) is 67.2 years. What made the difference? Firstly better food production thanks to science, secondly improved living and working conditions thanks to science and thirdly the breakthroughs science has made in modern medicine.
@NotEnoughLions farming and cultivation, human rights neither of which took a scientist to hold their hands, and yes science has helped medicine save the lives of people who had otherwise died however it has done nothing to extend our lives past what we are gentically coded to live. if you still feel otherwise could you please cite some names of people we know that lived in that time? say about 20 their ages at death and average of all.no graves necesary i will accept historical records
@Helge129 georgre washington died at 67 bled to death by a doctor john adams died age 90 thomas jefferson died age 83 aaron burr died age 80 james madison 85 james monroe 73 benjamin franklin 84 john quincy adams 80 andrew jackson 78 martin van buren 79 charles caroll 95 samuel adams 81 william ellery 92 francis lewis 89 robrt paine 83 james smith 87 mathew thorton 89 william williams 80 george wythe 80 average age of death for all signers 67. you said science has doubled the age. av today is67
@Helge129 its not an assumption and my example is valid. you said modern science has enabled people to live 2-3 times longer. i gave the names/ages of known people all of which lived to the same ages we live today, then i averaged the lifespans of the signers of the declaration of independance, as we can see no changes have been made. however i will say science has made large strides in saving the lives in people who would have died prematurely
@talons2112 Are you completely ignoring what I am saying?
AVERAGE livespan, not maximum livespam. People died a lot younger back then, due to disease, lack of hygene, starvation, etc. a lot more than nowadays. In fact, many diseases that were fatal back then are easily cured, and in some cases even extinct, thanks to, and only to, science.
@Helge129 wrong again. today more people than ever are dying from starvation, disease, lack of hygene, auto accidents, guns, bombs, continuous wars, drugs, alcohol. in the last hundred years more people have dies from war than in all human history. the only disease eradicated that hasnt returned is polio. heart disease, cancer, leprosy, stroke, etc are still claiming victims even more now than ever. the best science can do is stave them off for a while. but double the lifespan? no
@talons2112 Let's take the life expecancy of england and wales. Until about 1800 it oscilated between 30 and 40 years. Now it's at about 80. Doubled? Yes.
@Helge129 ok. but again the conditions they lived in as well as their work conditions were atrocious like living in a toilet and women there didnt even wear underwear until about 1800. it doesnt take a genious to know to wash your hands and undercarraige while delivering a baby, and dont live with rats thats not scientific but biblical. today swaziland has the lowest life expectancy at 39 years for men and women. becuase of the conditions they live in war, poverty, starvation,etc. pollution,
@Helge129 preventive medicine, exercise, clean environment, good food has always been the best medicine. when war comes move dont join. anyone living through any time in history who employed those tactics had the best chance of living to a ripe old age within the confines of our genetic makeup. science has only been able to stave off the inevitable not prolong our lifespan beyond what we are capable. entropy.
@Helge129 you give far too much credit to scientists. it doesnt take a scientist to tell you how to wash your hands, do some push ups, eat your vegetables and dont live where people will shoot you or get dressed in the morning
@Helge129 science has nothing to do with not smoking, drinking, exercising more, or picking up the garbage around where we live. they do have a lot to do with all the chemicals introduced into our environment, land mines, bombs, cigaretes, toxic dumps, radioactive waste. and their methods of dealing with these issues are ignored by those responsible for spreading them around in the first place. its not cost effective. so why should we have to pay a tax because a fctry wnt deal wth ts waste?
@NotEnoughLions john adams died age 90 thomas jefferson died age 83 aaron burr died age 80 james madison 85 james monroe 73 benjamin franklin 84 john quincy adams 80 andrew jackson 78 martin van buren 79 charles caroll 95 samuel adams 81 william ellery 92 francis lewis 89 robrt paine 83 james smith 87 mathew thorton 89 william williams 80 george wythe 80 i dont see any 160/180 year olds walking around. do you?
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
Evolution is a cult. It is not part of science. Evolution is a lie. Evolution is a false religion disguised as a topic in school. It should be abolished. Evolution is forced on children. That is why these children are zombies and full of hate. Evolution does not teach morals or values. It teaches that those who believe in the loving God are to be cursed and ridiculed. It teaches violence and hate. Evolution need to be abolished in the school curriculum NOW!!!!!
@pinball281 (I'm assuming you are a crazy creationist) with your line of reasoning, you could argue that a stone (in fact, anything) is also designed.
you should provide the reasoning behind your argument. if you dont provide it, then i can assert anything and i will back it up by saying "why wouldn't it be?".
@hibiscusfire I feel terribly sorry for you at the moment. I don't know if you're trolling, but if you're not, you have been seriously misled. You haven't displayed any understanding in any of your posts. All your posts come down to is basically this: "I'm not sure about all of this, therefore I believe God did it."
@hibiscusfire I'm possibly not sure on how certain I am that there's no God, but on whether evolution is a fact, I am certain. My hands are overflowing with rock solid evidence supporting evolution; far from empty handed.
What I suggest you do, is read a couple of books with an open mind. I would recommend 'The Greatest Show on Earth' since it's easy to follow (unlike some proper scientific journals) and is written by the man in this video. And remember, everything in the book is true.
@hibiscusfire The same ways that anything gets buried. Wind, rain and other weather can cause things to become buried. Other animals burying them, animals burying themselves before they die, mudslides, any possible way of fossils.
@hibiscusfire I call it factual. It has been observed. Studied properly and seen to happen in actuality. If you are too indoctrinated to look at and understand the evidence, maybe you should stop asking people to provide you with it.
@zenqimaster that is not factual. You can call it what you want, but you are wrong and so are many, many others. So the flood of Noah's time was real. Wind and rain caused them to be buried years ago.
So why would animals bury themselves before they die? Ridiculous. And why would other animals bury other animals? Have you ever seen this in your time? Why then?? So you mean to say those mudslides just happened without rain eh?
@zenqimaster That's the basic mindset of a Creationist. If everyone were able to open their mind and listen to what other people say, the word "Creationist" would not exist.
The stupidity of evolution. If the life span of a fish or worm or bacteria is so short where did they get the time to evolve for 6 billion years? They would have died and never gotten a chance to "evolve" What is the life span of a worm? Where did it get time to evolve into a fish? lol!!!!!! It would have surely drowned in the sea shore first.
@hibiscusfire implying that fish nor worm do not reproduce during their "short" lifespan. Implying they die after one generation. You know why bacteria are used the most to understand microevolution? because it takes them so little time to go through hundred of generations.
@hibiscusfire Please calm down and use some mathematical skills. It takes certain bacteria,say, 20mins, to go through 1 generation. how many minutes does it take for a human to go through a generation, good sir? As other evolutionist have told creationists, please. know the fact, don't just rage. Use your head a little and research what evolution really is before condemning it to hell.
@spoilingbrat you have been deceived by the evolutionists and atheists. You aren't using your head. You are killing your brain cells and your heart. Ask yourself, if it takes 20 mins bacteria to go through one generation (lol by the way), why on earth would it have taken billions of years to evolve from goo to a fish? LOL!
@spoilingbrat what i don't get about these creationists and their unwillingness to explore the research shown, whether it proves evolution or not (it does) is why they aren't interested in it anyway? there really isn't anything much more interesting than learnign about how the earth works and how the ecosystem works and evolution, astonomy, etc... creationists are missing out on all the fun!
@UBERxL33T if someone put a gun in your pocket without you noticing and you went through the airport security who would believe that it was not your gun? The majority of people would find you guilty, unfortunately you and the culprit would be the only ones who knows that you are innocent.
So the world works. The majority are the ones who follow the crowd.
@LesPaul2006 I figure every creature on Earth is worried about the weather, the family, the next meal and not getting beaten up on the way home. Not some of them, all of them. We're all in the same boat. Some have different abilities and techniques (the race is not always to the swift), some have different priorities, but always for a reason. I see Darwin as central, inevitable, unavoidable, logically necessary, and perhaps sufficient.
This seems to be a rather new discovery, about 3 years ago I have read that it was not completely sure what benefit the fungus from the ants might have. Really astonishing
@hibiscusfire Not all scientific videos are made to show religious fanatics how ridiculous their belief is. Many, like this one, are made to show the wonders of the real world to reasonable people.
@Fuglebolle Regardless of these so called "wonders", God is even greater than the "theory of evolution" because God is real. In this light, evolutionists should not assume that God is not real because they cannot see with the spiritual eyes. This is one thing evolutionists lack...it's like the third eye.
@hibiscusfire We don't lack this ability, we just call it 'imagination'.
And I don't doubt that God exist in your imagination, but for something to be 'real' (in my use of the word) it would have to exist in the real world. By the use of their "third eye", different people have come up with contrasting religions (max. 1 can be correct). This method of modelling the world has a very low (if any) certainty of success. Implying that a world view built solely on a third eye is very shaky at best.
@Fuglebolle Fact is, God is real, very real...so is Heaven and Hell just like your body, spirit and soul are real. God made man in His own image. Jesus is God the Son in the flesh. God is a Spirit, the supreme being. And the Holy Spirit is our comforter. All 3 are one just like we are made up of 3 parts so we also are one.
@hibiscusfire Because apart from reading the Bible, the Holy Spirit is real and shows us the truth. We are body, soul and spirit. God is God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit - 3 are one - Jesus is God in the flesh, God is the Supreme being, who He is, and the Holy Spirit. We have been made in the image of God. Our body is what we are, our spirit is how we are and our soul is who we are.
What proof do you have for anything that you just said ?
Spirit or soul is supposed to be source of or consciousness,personality,intelligence,and emotions but scientific research shows that consciousness,personality,intelligence,and emotions are product of brain and that it can all be changed by chemicals and brain damage .
@zoltan6561 Spiritual research or rather spiritual oneness with God gives the proof. Did you know that even though a person can be brain dead they can still have feelings of emotions? Science cannot show otherwise because even doctors are baffled by the miracles of people who they claim would die yet they live & live to tell their experiences. A person with a stoke may have brain damage but they still have feelings & can do things, & that is a fact because they would let you know how they feel.
@ThePuffyDuck A person who may be brain dead still have other functions in the body working which would still be functional so you or the doctor do not know what they are feeling. Doctors and scientists have no control over the miracles of God and they cannot produce life.
@hibiscusfire Uh no. If you are brain dead, you aren't living. If the part that controls your heart dies, you're dead. It's common sense. Lmao, please prove that a God created life.
@ThePuffyDuck A boy was said to be brain dead in1993.There was a dispute in England among anesthesiologists due to the reaction of brain dead patients during organ retrieval process.If no anesthetic is used,patients react to pain of incisions by trying to move away from the scaple. The moment the scapel cuts, patients blood pressure&heartbeat increase dramatically too.Brain death is not real death since the heart is still beating&when u touch their body it is warm, proving they're still alive.
@hibiscusfire Are you just going to spam that? Brain death is the end of all brain activity including those that are necessary to sustain life. We can now keep patients alive even though they are brain dead, but that's because of OUR technology, not because we have "spirits". You lose, go away now.
@hibiscusfire From an article: "These patients are brain dead without any hope of recovery or survival." NO HOPE OF SURVIVAL. When you're brain dead, you will die. This is a fact. Once again you lose.
@hibiscusfire "Brain death means there is no activity in the brain. The brain is no longer functioning in any capacity and it never again will function. Because the brain is dead, the individual cannot feel pain." Why the heart still beats: "The heart is part of the autonomic nervous system and thus has the ability to beat independently of the brain as long as it has oxygen. The heart will eventually stop beating as all bodily systems begin to stop working shortly after brain death."
@hibiscusfire Uh yes I do. Every article on the internet says pretty much the same thing. Not only that but I know Neurologists, and they all agree. You're wrong, get over it.
@hibiscusfire Scientist have in fact produced RNA in a lab, which is a very primitive self replicating molecule. They say it's not alive, but that's nothing but political correctness. They have created actual synthetic life in a lab.
@hibiscusfire A brain dead person can't even breath on his/her own. All he/she retains is pupil reflexes. Nothing more. Is practically a corpse. That body feels nothing anymore. Some patients who have had a bad stroke or something retain lower brain functions, but that's not brain death. Please, go check "Brain Death" on Wikipedia.
no person cannot be brain dead have emotions and wake up because if neuron cells in the brain are dead they cannot be repaired or replaced by new one I think you thought about coma which is not the same as brain dead.
People who have had a stroke or other brain damage often have changed in personality .
@zoltan6561 A boy was said to be brain dead in1993.There was a dispute in England among anesthesiologists due to the reaction of brain dead patients during organ retrieval process. If no anesthetic is used,patients react to pain of incisions by trying to move away from the scaple.At the moment the scapel cuts, patients blood pressure&heartbeat increase dramatically too. Brain death is not real death since the heart is still beating&when u touch their body it is warm, proving they're still alive.
@hibiscusfire (sigh) feelings can be read with a simple brainscan. No brain activity, no feelings. No response to stimuli, no feelings. That is an absolute and undeniable FACT, sir. The brain activity of a brain dead person is a flat line, just like a dead heart (a long beep... remember?). I'm telling you again: EDUCATE, EDUCATE yourself. Please.
@hibiscusfire There's a tiny tiny difference between brain damage and brain death. Brain death means you're DEAD. Even if they keep pumping blood through you, you're irreversibly DEAD, and there isn't a single person who ever came back from that. Protracted comma states, intoxications, even cardiac arrest, none of them are equal to brain death. You NEED to educate yourself, sir. Really.
yea well...we'll see how much weeding and farming they do when theyre crunched between the treads under my shoe. id like for an ant to come up and ask me 'wtf im doing' its gunna need a lot more strength than 50x its own body weight to come at this big bad human.
@CantWeedThis Is that supposed to be impressive? Funny, perhaps? It's hard to tell which it's supposed to be as it is really neither. You need to practise the difference between direct and indirect speech, too. Are you not a native English speaker? After reading that, I'd have to assume you're not.
@ScotsmanRS you need to practice how to spell practice but im sure you misspelled it incorrectly as bait because you know im an internet grammar gangster isnt that right? Of course it is..and i just baited you into thinking that i believed that you misspelled that word on purpose because you really just fucked up because you have inferior grammar speech. Also i would like to add that i do infact know the difference between direct and indirect for example when i punch you directly in the face.
@CantWeedThis No, I don't need any practice spelling it. "Practice" is a noun, "practise" is a verb. It's not my fault you don't understand real English and need to simplify everything. I'm sure you're familiar with using a capital "I" for the first person singular pronoun, right? Using apostrophes wouldn't kill you, either. There are three dots in an ellipsis, so ".." is incorrect. "In fact" - they are two separate words. As for punching my face... you wouldn't be able to reach my face, child.
thats not fuckin fair to bait someone with a word that resembles another word but that isnt taught in english class in america. Fuck your vocabulary ill bring a step ladder
@JONNOG88 yes but we are humans and they are ants and since we are humans we are so much greater than ants because we step on ants because we are humans so we can do whatever we want because theres nothing that can stop us humans not even ants because again we are humans and they are ants and we are so much greater. Are you dumb or somthing? hey everyone this guy thinks ant armies will take over us humans and kill us all ! lololol
@cocojumb0 no, but good guess. i came to the video because i saw "ants that farm". Then i said "hey, ants cant farm! because theyre ants, ant not humans!" (< had to leave that typo lol) Who are they to think they can do what we do? Get on our level ant bitches, you know..
@CantWeedThis ants even "farm" other animals. i think that ants have farmed animals and weed long before we humans did so technically they could ask wtf we are doing.
Hi, If your an atheist as am I, please check out my channel, where I'll be assessing major issues our society is facing in terms of religion and basic ethics... As well as the occasional video game content as I am a bit of a gamer..
I thought this was going to be about Cannabis
thevideoguy666 1 week ago
Amazing and Beautiful!
TheRainingInk 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Romans 1:20-23 20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
talons2112 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
talons2112 2 months ago
@conorjohanc because it's prince is the father of lies.
talons2112 2 months ago
Complexity doesn't point to design, it often points to lack of design. If a creator were creating an efficient system, why have multiple layers of symbyosis, why not provide a seperate food supply for all organisms involved instead of the ants having to go out of their way to "insure" the viability of their crops?
cannibalcarrot666 2 months ago
This is simply beautiful.
babypappa 3 months ago in playlist Liked
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 3 months ago
that fungus pest is a troll XD
freiheitsalv 3 months ago
Comment removed
freiheitsalv 3 months ago
yes they are unique. there are no others like them. so how did they evolve? everything you described is extremely complex and diverse. there is no way it evolved.
talons2112 3 months ago
@talons2112 So you believe a talking snake told a woman who was made from the rib of a man to eat a piece of fruit and now your saying thousands of scientists working with a proven method got it all wrong.
NotEnoughLions 3 months ago
@NotEnoughLions yes. have you ever heard of a snake oil salesman? a snake in the grass? a liar? these concepts are hard for you to understand because you not interested in searching for the truth. it always the lone voice and not the mjority that has the truth. the scientists of the day thought galileo was a fool when he was dropping two bodies of different mass from the tower of piza. finally the scientists of the day are not proven any more than they were in the days of galileo
talons2112 3 months ago
@talons2112 What is hard for me to understand is your level of willful ignorance. Science has doubled your life span and increased crop yields by 800%. You are debating on a computer and enjoy the benefits science has given you and those you care about. How low can you go to support a cult of ignorance?
Why was Jesus sacrificed on a cross to save mankind? Why did Middle Eastern tribes sacrifice animals to change their luck in a practice commonly known as scapegoating?
NotEnoughLions 3 months ago
@NotEnoughLions what is hard for me to understand is why you cant answer a question. science has not extended out lifespan. man does not and will not live past about 120 and people are still starving around the world. my computer was created by engineers like wozniak. so far all i heard were things i think you make up in your head. do you have any facts to back up any of these beliefs?
talons2112 3 months ago
@talons2112 What do you think the average life span was 400 years ago?
NotEnoughLions 3 months ago
@NotEnoughLions depends on where they lived and the lifestyle afforded by the environment but i would guess it was much like today. i had a friend that died in the middle of a basketball game when we were 16. then again i have been to grave sites in europe that dated from the 1400's and there were people of all ages buried there much like today. i don't see much difference. but i am still upset over george washington being bled to death by the physicians of his day. man doesnt live past 120
talons2112 3 months ago
@talons2112 science has extended the average livespan from about 30 or 40, to 70-80.
Helge129 2 months ago
@Helge129 people have always had an average lifespan of 70-80 years for the last 4000 years. we can see this by historical records and graves despite gmo foods, pollution, getting run over by cars, victims of war, murder, disease, being nuked, cigarettes, alcohol, etc....
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 No, that is simply not correct. The average life span mere 1000 years ago was in the range of anywhere between 20 and 40 years, depending on where and how one lived. Modern medicine has doubled that, and allowed some to live even thrice that.
Helge129 2 months ago
@Helge129 i have to dissagree. thrice that? i have not seen a gravestone that marks anyone living to 240 years due to science. sure medicine has saved many lives but the most anyone can hope to live for is 120 which seems to be the wall. people start passing around 40-80 something despite some mishap, poor lifestyle, war or disease of which we still have no cure for. no matter what science does we will never see any 200 year old people. it's not in our code.
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 thrice 40 = 120 years. And the longest documented lifespan is 122 years so far.
Helge129 2 months ago
@talons2112 What was the AVERAGE life span 200 years ago and what is it now? The difference is the advantages science has given to modern medicine and agriculture. Talking about individuals who might live very long or very short lives is your feeble attempt to deflect the conversation and avoid the fact that you religious beliefs have provided nothing and science has been successful. You are a total fail.
NotEnoughLions 2 months ago
@NotEnoughLions georgre washington died at 67 bled to death by a doctor john adams died age 90 thomas jefferson died age 83 aaron burr died age 80 james madison 85 james monroe 73 benjamin franklin 84 john quincy adams 80 andrew jackson 78 martin van buren 79 charles caroll 95 samuel adams 81 william ellery 92 francis lewis 89 robrt paine 83 james smith 87 mathew thorton 89 william williams 80 george wythe 80 none of these people lived to these ages because of your fantasies no change
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 Make a bit of an effort and learn the meaning of average. We can all select individuals out of millions to skew the figures.
NotEnoughLions 2 months ago
@NotEnoughLions nice shell game you got going there. i only selected based on names of people you would know and couldnt deny of which the only one effected by science was washington who was bled to death by a sciencetard of his day. but as can plainly see people back 200 years ago lived to the same average age people do today with NO HELP from the advancements of science. furthermore you said the age has doubled and i dont see any 160/180 yo people do you? your fantasy is a total fail
talons2112 2 months ago
@NotEnoughLions just cant admit you are wrong no matter what
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 Admit I'm wrong!!!! You are denying the facts. Making up rubbish to support your claims. Average allows for some to live long lives but 200 years ago most people died before they were fifty.
NotEnoughLions 2 months ago
@NotEnoughLions i am not denying any facts. people throughout time have died at all ages. i took the signers of the declaration of independence which are people we all know existed and when living over 200 years ago. one of them i think died when he was 30, the oldest 95, from all of them the average was 67, you can look through any obit today and see the same thing. no change. you claim science has doubled the age i see no evidence of that anywhere or any facts that suggest otherwise. u r wrong
talons2112 2 months ago
@NotEnoughLions are you saying george washington, thomas jefferson, adams, q adams, and the rest of the signers didnt live and die and that they are just fairy tales? those people that die young are usually to something causal, war, starvation, disease, etc., but not due to age limitation. i had a friend die in a motorcycle accident science did nothing to get him to live to 150. i presented facts it is you ignoring them. admit u r are wrong. its ok u can do it. :) thenwecanmoveonto the nexttopic
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 The AVERAGE age during the Bronze Age was 26 years. The current world's (including the third world) AVERAGE age (2010) is 67.2 years. What made the difference? Firstly better food production thanks to science, secondly improved living and working conditions thanks to science and thirdly the breakthroughs science has made in modern medicine.
NotEnoughLions 2 months ago
@NotEnoughLions farming and cultivation, human rights neither of which took a scientist to hold their hands, and yes science has helped medicine save the lives of people who had otherwise died however it has done nothing to extend our lives past what we are gentically coded to live. if you still feel otherwise could you please cite some names of people we know that lived in that time? say about 20 their ages at death and average of all.no graves necesary i will accept historical records
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 Science drives modern agriculture. You’re a recalcitrant, uneducated and bigoted idiot. I have wasted far too much time on you now.
NotEnoughLions 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Helge129 georgre washington died at 67 bled to death by a doctor john adams died age 90 thomas jefferson died age 83 aaron burr died age 80 james madison 85 james monroe 73 benjamin franklin 84 john quincy adams 80 andrew jackson 78 martin van buren 79 charles caroll 95 samuel adams 81 william ellery 92 francis lewis 89 robrt paine 83 james smith 87 mathew thorton 89 william williams 80 george wythe 80 average age of death for all signers 67. you said science has doubled the age. av today is67
talons2112 2 months ago
it appears science has made no change in the lifespan of humans.
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 You would be wrong with that asumption. The evidence clearly points to the contrary.
Helge129 2 months ago
@Helge129 its not an assumption and my example is valid. you said modern science has enabled people to live 2-3 times longer. i gave the names/ages of known people all of which lived to the same ages we live today, then i averaged the lifespans of the signers of the declaration of independance, as we can see no changes have been made. however i will say science has made large strides in saving the lives in people who would have died prematurely
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 Are you completely ignoring what I am saying?
AVERAGE livespan, not maximum livespam. People died a lot younger back then, due to disease, lack of hygene, starvation, etc. a lot more than nowadays. In fact, many diseases that were fatal back then are easily cured, and in some cases even extinct, thanks to, and only to, science.
Which in turn increased the average livespan.
Helge129 2 months ago
@Helge129 wrong again. today more people than ever are dying from starvation, disease, lack of hygene, auto accidents, guns, bombs, continuous wars, drugs, alcohol. in the last hundred years more people have dies from war than in all human history. the only disease eradicated that hasnt returned is polio. heart disease, cancer, leprosy, stroke, etc are still claiming victims even more now than ever. the best science can do is stave them off for a while. but double the lifespan? no
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 Let's take the life expecancy of england and wales. Until about 1800 it oscilated between 30 and 40 years. Now it's at about 80. Doubled? Yes.
Helge129 2 months ago
@Helge129 ok. but again the conditions they lived in as well as their work conditions were atrocious like living in a toilet and women there didnt even wear underwear until about 1800. it doesnt take a genious to know to wash your hands and undercarraige while delivering a baby, and dont live with rats thats not scientific but biblical. today swaziland has the lowest life expectancy at 39 years for men and women. becuase of the conditions they live in war, poverty, starvation,etc. pollution,
talons2112 2 months ago
@Helge129 preventive medicine, exercise, clean environment, good food has always been the best medicine. when war comes move dont join. anyone living through any time in history who employed those tactics had the best chance of living to a ripe old age within the confines of our genetic makeup. science has only been able to stave off the inevitable not prolong our lifespan beyond what we are capable. entropy.
talons2112 2 months ago
@talons2112 And how do you think all that improved? SCIENCE.
Helge129 2 months ago
@Helge129 you give far too much credit to scientists. it doesnt take a scientist to tell you how to wash your hands, do some push ups, eat your vegetables and dont live where people will shoot you or get dressed in the morning
talons2112 2 months ago
@Helge129 science has nothing to do with not smoking, drinking, exercising more, or picking up the garbage around where we live. they do have a lot to do with all the chemicals introduced into our environment, land mines, bombs, cigaretes, toxic dumps, radioactive waste. and their methods of dealing with these issues are ignored by those responsible for spreading them around in the first place. its not cost effective. so why should we have to pay a tax because a fctry wnt deal wth ts waste?
talons2112 2 months ago
@Helge129 the cia factbook has swaziland listed at 31 as the average age. the first one i posted was by the UN at 39.
talons2112 2 months ago
@NotEnoughLions john adams died age 90 thomas jefferson died age 83 aaron burr died age 80 james madison 85 james monroe 73 benjamin franklin 84 john quincy adams 80 andrew jackson 78 martin van buren 79 charles caroll 95 samuel adams 81 william ellery 92 francis lewis 89 robrt paine 83 james smith 87 mathew thorton 89 william williams 80 george wythe 80 i dont see any 160/180 year olds walking around. do you?
talons2112 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 months ago
why cant humans form such a relationship with nature
enyawix 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Dawkins has gone off the rails:
search for Richard Dawkins and male privilege on Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy blog.
Participating in flaming a woman because she dares to say 'don't objectify me at a conference'? Poorly done, Dawkins.
8yankee 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evolution is a cult. It is not part of science. Evolution is a lie. Evolution is a false religion disguised as a topic in school. It should be abolished. Evolution is forced on children. That is why these children are zombies and full of hate. Evolution does not teach morals or values. It teaches that those who believe in the loving God are to be cursed and ridiculed. It teaches violence and hate. Evolution need to be abolished in the school curriculum NOW!!!!!
hibiscusfire 5 months ago
beautiful explained and beautiful nature :)
DerMacDuff 5 months ago
@khris2049 Christ didn’t even exist. There is a lie for you. Knowledge has always frightened fundie Christians.
NotEnoughLions 5 months ago
design??
pinball281 5 months ago
@pinball281 why would it be designed?
umutsilva 5 months ago
@umutsilva why wouldent it?
pinball281 5 months ago
@pinball281 (I'm assuming you are a crazy creationist) with your line of reasoning, you could argue that a stone (in fact, anything) is also designed.
you should provide the reasoning behind your argument. if you dont provide it, then i can assert anything and i will back it up by saying "why wouldn't it be?".
umutsilva 5 months ago
@umutsilva yeah but why wouldent it??
pinball281 5 months ago
@pinball281 well played! :)
umutsilva 5 months ago
@khris2049 He is an anti-Christ. The devil is using him. He is a beast in human form.
hibiscusfire 5 months ago
@hibiscusfire AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH your right he is the anti-Christ lets grab our pitchforks !!!!
hgtrance 5 months ago
@hgtrance Hell is real. And so is Heaven.
hibiscusfire 5 months ago
@khris2049 Don't go around calling people the devil, such weighted words shouldn't be thrown around so carelessly.
spoilingbrat 5 months ago
Long live Dawkins
stephenboing 5 months ago
If humans did not exist along with dinosaurs, who do you think planted the fruits and vegetables? Who bred animals for meat food?
hibiscusfire 5 months ago
@hibiscusfire I feel terribly sorry for you at the moment. I don't know if you're trolling, but if you're not, you have been seriously misled. You haven't displayed any understanding in any of your posts. All your posts come down to is basically this: "I'm not sure about all of this, therefore I believe God did it."
zenqimaster 5 months ago
@zenqimaster I am sure, you are the one among many other evolutionists who are not sure, and that is why you always come up empty handed
hibiscusfire 5 months ago
@hibiscusfire I'm possibly not sure on how certain I am that there's no God, but on whether evolution is a fact, I am certain. My hands are overflowing with rock solid evidence supporting evolution; far from empty handed.
What I suggest you do, is read a couple of books with an open mind. I would recommend 'The Greatest Show on Earth' since it's easy to follow (unlike some proper scientific journals) and is written by the man in this video. And remember, everything in the book is true.
zenqimaster 5 months ago
@zenqimaster how do you think fossils got burried?
hibiscusfire 5 months ago
@hibiscusfire The same ways that anything gets buried. Wind, rain and other weather can cause things to become buried. Other animals burying them, animals burying themselves before they die, mudslides, any possible way of fossils.
Here's a link to help you with that question:
wisegeek.com/how-do-fossils-get-inside-rocks.htm
zenqimaster 5 months ago
@zenqimaster you call that logical?
hibiscusfire 5 months ago
@hibiscusfire I call it factual. It has been observed. Studied properly and seen to happen in actuality. If you are too indoctrinated to look at and understand the evidence, maybe you should stop asking people to provide you with it.
zenqimaster 5 months ago
@zenqimaster that is not factual. You can call it what you want, but you are wrong and so are many, many others. So the flood of Noah's time was real. Wind and rain caused them to be buried years ago.
So why would animals bury themselves before they die? Ridiculous. And why would other animals bury other animals? Have you ever seen this in your time? Why then?? So you mean to say those mudslides just happened without rain eh?
hibiscusfire 5 months ago
@hibiscusfire I have seen a cat crawl under a shed in order to die. The same happens with dogs; they find a rock to crawl under to die.
I've seen dogs bury bones, cats bury dead birds and I'm sure other animals bury their findings too. It is factual.
I didn't claim that mudslides happen without rain. Rain is an every day occurrence and doesn't require Noah's flood to happen.
By the way, did you read the link I provided or are you too scared that you might have been indoctrinated?
zenqimaster 5 months ago
@zenqimaster That's the basic mindset of a Creationist. If everyone were able to open their mind and listen to what other people say, the word "Creationist" would not exist.
spoilingbrat 5 months ago
The stupidity of evolution. If the life span of a fish or worm or bacteria is so short where did they get the time to evolve for 6 billion years? They would have died and never gotten a chance to "evolve" What is the life span of a worm? Where did it get time to evolve into a fish? lol!!!!!! It would have surely drowned in the sea shore first.
hibiscusfire 6 months ago
@hibiscusfire implying that fish nor worm do not reproduce during their "short" lifespan. Implying they die after one generation. You know why bacteria are used the most to understand microevolution? because it takes them so little time to go through hundred of generations.
spoilingbrat 6 months ago
@spoilingbrat so it takes so little time yet it took billions of years to get modern animals and humans??? Oh please enough with the crap!
hibiscusfire 6 months ago
@hibiscusfire Please calm down and use some mathematical skills. It takes certain bacteria,say, 20mins, to go through 1 generation. how many minutes does it take for a human to go through a generation, good sir? As other evolutionist have told creationists, please. know the fact, don't just rage. Use your head a little and research what evolution really is before condemning it to hell.
spoilingbrat 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@spoilingbrat you have been deceived by the evolutionists and atheists. You aren't using your head. You are killing your brain cells and your heart. Ask yourself, if it takes 20 mins bacteria to go through one generation (lol by the way), why on earth would it have taken billions of years to evolve from goo to a fish? LOL!
hibiscusfire 6 months ago
@spoilingbrat what i don't get about these creationists and their unwillingness to explore the research shown, whether it proves evolution or not (it does) is why they aren't interested in it anyway? there really isn't anything much more interesting than learnign about how the earth works and how the ecosystem works and evolution, astonomy, etc... creationists are missing out on all the fun!
LOGIC42369 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 6 months ago
@UBERxL33T if someone put a gun in your pocket without you noticing and you went through the airport security who would believe that it was not your gun? The majority of people would find you guilty, unfortunately you and the culprit would be the only ones who knows that you are innocent.
So the world works. The majority are the ones who follow the crowd.
hibiscusfire 6 months ago
THIS IS PROOF OF GOD PRAISE JESUS AND CONVERT TO ISLAM
OrderoftheWhiteHand 7 months ago
Comment removed
marsCubed 7 months ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand Thor will crush you with his hammer, you filthy heretic!
LesPaul2006 6 months ago
That's insanely cool. How can people not be in awe of nature.
cutes22 7 months ago
I wish Dawkins would end this video with "pssh, ain't no god, bitches."
maikeru01 8 months ago
Hail Ants!!! I for one welcome our new ant overlords.
SpaceCowboyZer0 8 months ago
People! Forgot arguing neurology with a moron. ANTS! Look above!!! They FARM!
featuringfranklin 8 months ago
any 5 year old could understand this shit!
spartanses 8 months ago
@spartanses Dawkins is just that good
Ikorose11 7 months ago
HAHA :P
ATBINTC 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Science is interesting, and if you don't think so then you can fuck off!
LucianUramu 9 months ago
Not the kind of weed I was thinking of!
colie577 9 months ago
Richard Dawkins says creationism is ridiculous. Hibiscusfire proves it!
quasarsphere 9 months ago
If i touch an ant i get fungus ? oh crap D:
Juppie902 9 months ago
amazing
1EpicLulz 10 months ago
Ants are AWESOME
RexMineCraft 10 months ago
These videos have so much truth in them it takes forever to load
MrSwedenik 10 months ago
Wow, I have an all new respect for how hard ants work lol
pac6010 11 months ago
@pac6010 A lady who studied ants in Arizona concluded that at any given time about a third of them were not doing anything at all.
gamesbok 9 months ago
@gamesbok Just like us!
LesPaul2006 7 months ago
@LesPaul2006 I figure every creature on Earth is worried about the weather, the family, the next meal and not getting beaten up on the way home. Not some of them, all of them. We're all in the same boat. Some have different abilities and techniques (the race is not always to the swift), some have different priorities, but always for a reason. I see Darwin as central, inevitable, unavoidable, logically necessary, and perhaps sufficient.
'What about morals?' Go watch 'Battle in Kruger'.
gamesbok 7 months ago
Didn't get a word of that, ended up day dreaming lol. =/
salford08 11 months ago
This seems to be a rather new discovery, about 3 years ago I have read that it was not completely sure what benefit the fungus from the ants might have. Really astonishing
atheistfromaustria 11 months ago
What does this have to do with evolution? Ants are insects with six legs. Did they come from fish? Lol!!!
hibiscusfire 1 year ago
@hibiscusfire Not all scientific videos are made to show religious fanatics how ridiculous their belief is. Many, like this one, are made to show the wonders of the real world to reasonable people.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle Regardless of these so called "wonders", God is even greater than the "theory of evolution" because God is real. In this light, evolutionists should not assume that God is not real because they cannot see with the spiritual eyes. This is one thing evolutionists lack...it's like the third eye.
hibiscusfire 1 year ago
@hibiscusfire We don't lack this ability, we just call it 'imagination'.
And I don't doubt that God exist in your imagination, but for something to be 'real' (in my use of the word) it would have to exist in the real world. By the use of their "third eye", different people have come up with contrasting religions (max. 1 can be correct). This method of modelling the world has a very low (if any) certainty of success. Implying that a world view built solely on a third eye is very shaky at best.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle Fact is, God is real, very real...so is Heaven and Hell just like your body, spirit and soul are real. God made man in His own image. Jesus is God the Son in the flesh. God is a Spirit, the supreme being. And the Holy Spirit is our comforter. All 3 are one just like we are made up of 3 parts so we also are one.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire How do you know that?
Fuglebolle 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire Because apart from reading the Bible, the Holy Spirit is real and shows us the truth. We are body, soul and spirit. God is God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit - 3 are one - Jesus is God in the flesh, God is the Supreme being, who He is, and the Holy Spirit. We have been made in the image of God. Our body is what we are, our spirit is how we are and our soul is who we are.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire
What proof do you have for anything that you just said ?
Spirit or soul is supposed to be source of or consciousness,personality,intelligence,and emotions but scientific research shows that consciousness,personality,intelligence,and emotions are product of brain and that it can all be changed by chemicals and brain damage .
zoltan6561 9 months ago
@zoltan6561 Spiritual research or rather spiritual oneness with God gives the proof. Did you know that even though a person can be brain dead they can still have feelings of emotions? Science cannot show otherwise because even doctors are baffled by the miracles of people who they claim would die yet they live & live to tell their experiences. A person with a stoke may have brain damage but they still have feelings & can do things, & that is a fact because they would let you know how they feel.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire You can't be brain dead and still have feelings. Please give the evidence otherwise.
ThePuffyDuck 9 months ago
@ThePuffyDuck A person who may be brain dead still have other functions in the body working which would still be functional so you or the doctor do not know what they are feeling. Doctors and scientists have no control over the miracles of God and they cannot produce life.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire Uh no. If you are brain dead, you aren't living. If the part that controls your heart dies, you're dead. It's common sense. Lmao, please prove that a God created life.
ThePuffyDuck 9 months ago
@ThePuffyDuck A boy was said to be brain dead in1993.There was a dispute in England among anesthesiologists due to the reaction of brain dead patients during organ retrieval process.If no anesthetic is used,patients react to pain of incisions by trying to move away from the scaple. The moment the scapel cuts, patients blood pressure&heartbeat increase dramatically too.Brain death is not real death since the heart is still beating&when u touch their body it is warm, proving they're still alive.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire Are you just going to spam that? Brain death is the end of all brain activity including those that are necessary to sustain life. We can now keep patients alive even though they are brain dead, but that's because of OUR technology, not because we have "spirits". You lose, go away now.
ThePuffyDuck 9 months ago
@ThePuffyDuck You are not understanding the post? Read it again please.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire Read my comment. It shows why yours is complete bullcrap.
ThePuffyDuck 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire From an article: "These patients are brain dead without any hope of recovery or survival." NO HOPE OF SURVIVAL. When you're brain dead, you will die. This is a fact. Once again you lose.
ThePuffyDuck 9 months ago
@ThePuffyDuck You got that from an article sure but that still doesn't say what a person is feeling.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire "Brain death means there is no activity in the brain. The brain is no longer functioning in any capacity and it never again will function. Because the brain is dead, the individual cannot feel pain." Why the heart still beats: "The heart is part of the autonomic nervous system and thus has the ability to beat independently of the brain as long as it has oxygen. The heart will eventually stop beating as all bodily systems begin to stop working shortly after brain death."
ThePuffyDuck 9 months ago
@ThePuffyDuck YOu don't know that.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire Uh yes I do. Every article on the internet says pretty much the same thing. Not only that but I know Neurologists, and they all agree. You're wrong, get over it.
ThePuffyDuck 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire Scientist have in fact produced RNA in a lab, which is a very primitive self replicating molecule. They say it's not alive, but that's nothing but political correctness. They have created actual synthetic life in a lab.
LesPaul2006 7 months ago
@LesPaul2006 all body cells are not brain cells.
hibiscusfire 6 months ago
@hibiscusfire A brain dead person can't even breath on his/her own. All he/she retains is pupil reflexes. Nothing more. Is practically a corpse. That body feels nothing anymore. Some patients who have had a bad stroke or something retain lower brain functions, but that's not brain death. Please, go check "Brain Death" on Wikipedia.
LesPaul2006 6 months ago
@hibiscusfire
no person cannot be brain dead have emotions and wake up because if neuron cells in the brain are dead they cannot be repaired or replaced by new one I think you thought about coma which is not the same as brain dead.
People who have had a stroke or other brain damage often have changed in personality .
zoltan6561 9 months ago
@zoltan6561 A boy was said to be brain dead in1993.There was a dispute in England among anesthesiologists due to the reaction of brain dead patients during organ retrieval process. If no anesthetic is used,patients react to pain of incisions by trying to move away from the scaple.At the moment the scapel cuts, patients blood pressure&heartbeat increase dramatically too. Brain death is not real death since the heart is still beating&when u touch their body it is warm, proving they're still alive.
hibiscusfire 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire Name of the boy? Or was that a story your preacher told you? Brain dead patients do not have pain response, only eye reflexes.
LesPaul2006 6 months ago
@LesPaul2006 did a brain dead person tell you that and how he felt?
hibiscusfire 6 months ago
@hibiscusfire (sigh) feelings can be read with a simple brainscan. No brain activity, no feelings. No response to stimuli, no feelings. That is an absolute and undeniable FACT, sir. The brain activity of a brain dead person is a flat line, just like a dead heart (a long beep... remember?). I'm telling you again: EDUCATE, EDUCATE yourself. Please.
LesPaul2006 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LesPaul2006 you are brain dead. You have no feelings.
hibiscusfire 6 months ago
@hibiscusfire
humantruth dot info/emotions dot html
zoltan6561 9 months ago
@hibiscusfire There's a tiny tiny difference between brain damage and brain death. Brain death means you're DEAD. Even if they keep pumping blood through you, you're irreversibly DEAD, and there isn't a single person who ever came back from that. Protracted comma states, intoxications, even cardiac arrest, none of them are equal to brain death. You NEED to educate yourself, sir. Really.
LesPaul2006 6 months ago
@hibiscusfire You preach so hastily that you just have replied to your own comment :)
LesPaul2006 7 months ago
@LesPaul2006 just because a person cannot function in one part of the body doesn't mean the other parts don't work
hibiscusfire 7 months ago
@hibiscusfire Exactly. That's why "irreductible complexity" is a fallacy from the very start.
LesPaul2006 6 months ago
@hibiscusfire
heaven and hell is not true.
chesster423 7 months ago
@chesster423 who told you that?
hibiscusfire 7 months ago
@hibiscusfire
my self, my conscience, my mind....
chesster423 7 months ago
@hibiscusfire LMFAO
letsmakeapoint 9 months ago
Yea, God does wonderful works just look at nature, independant yet connected in so many ways.
glendaweil 1 year ago
@glendaweil
And that connection is explained very very nicely by the theory of evolution. Isn't science great? :)
quasarsphere 9 months ago
yea well...we'll see how much weeding and farming they do when theyre crunched between the treads under my shoe. id like for an ant to come up and ask me 'wtf im doing' its gunna need a lot more strength than 50x its own body weight to come at this big bad human.
CantWeedThis 1 year ago
@CantWeedThis Is that supposed to be impressive? Funny, perhaps? It's hard to tell which it's supposed to be as it is really neither. You need to practise the difference between direct and indirect speech, too. Are you not a native English speaker? After reading that, I'd have to assume you're not.
ScotsmanRS 11 months ago
@ScotsmanRS you need to practice how to spell practice but im sure you misspelled it incorrectly as bait because you know im an internet grammar gangster isnt that right? Of course it is..and i just baited you into thinking that i believed that you misspelled that word on purpose because you really just fucked up because you have inferior grammar speech. Also i would like to add that i do infact know the difference between direct and indirect for example when i punch you directly in the face.
CantWeedThis 10 months ago
@CantWeedThis No, I don't need any practice spelling it. "Practice" is a noun, "practise" is a verb. It's not my fault you don't understand real English and need to simplify everything. I'm sure you're familiar with using a capital "I" for the first person singular pronoun, right? Using apostrophes wouldn't kill you, either. There are three dots in an ellipsis, so ".." is incorrect. "In fact" - they are two separate words. As for punching my face... you wouldn't be able to reach my face, child.
ScotsmanRS 10 months ago
thats not fuckin fair to bait someone with a word that resembles another word but that isnt taught in english class in america. Fuck your vocabulary ill bring a step ladder
CantWeedThis 10 months ago
@CantWeedThis LOL@ grammar ganster...
those guys are asses...
MrDerby2u 9 months ago
lets train ants to be slaves for us !
CantWeedThis 1 year ago
@CantWeedThis
No, bad idea. Please bare in mind they outnumber us by atleast 100,000,000 to 1.
When if they go "Sparticus" on us.
JONNOG88 1 year ago
@JONNOG88 yes but we are humans and they are ants and since we are humans we are so much greater than ants because we step on ants because we are humans so we can do whatever we want because theres nothing that can stop us humans not even ants because again we are humans and they are ants and we are so much greater. Are you dumb or somthing? hey everyone this guy thinks ant armies will take over us humans and kill us all ! lololol
CantWeedThis 1 year ago
@CantWeedThis let me guess, you came to this video because of the "weed" in the title
cocojumb0 1 year ago
@cocojumb0 no, but good guess. i came to the video because i saw "ants that farm". Then i said "hey, ants cant farm! because theyre ants, ant not humans!" (< had to leave that typo lol) Who are they to think they can do what we do? Get on our level ant bitches, you know..
CantWeedThis 1 year ago
@CantWeedThis ants even "farm" other animals. i think that ants have farmed animals and weed long before we humans did so technically they could ask wtf we are doing.
cocojumb0 1 year ago
@cocojumb0
Ants not only can farm, but they talk to each other. Watch my video "My God Delusion part 1". I made it as a response to Dawkins video.
/watch?v=7MIqSDFReuo
helasmoh 1 year ago
Richard Dawkins + one of his lectures makes my day :D
JollSSteR 1 year ago
and on the 5th day, God invented bumble bees, then a wasp flew by and he said "Fuck, I really should start making a list" ...
PhilMason99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Online Russian girls ** leefoxnow.info **
PokliCbvgt 1 year ago
Aren't antibiotics only against bacteria? Aren't those bacteria producing antimycotics?
Dofol 1 year ago
whoaa theres a fungus on the fungus that the fungus is grown by the ants!
Lachy101 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi, If your an atheist as am I, please check out my channel, where I'll be assessing major issues our society is facing in terms of religion and basic ethics... As well as the occasional video game content as I am a bit of a gamer..
I hope you'll check it out. Cheers, Mitchel
TIME4LOGIC 1 year ago
Gawd did it. We don't know why He made it so fucking complicated, but Gawd did it. Gawd tells me so.
Actually, it's an astounding piece of evolutionary biology. We get complicated emergent properties from very simple rules.
bdf2718 1 year ago
24 people couldn't find this in their bibles.
arcaneminded 1 year ago
extraordinary
BlueNile123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evolution? I didn't see any Evolution. Why is the word "Evolution" on the display?
Entropy56 1 year ago
@Entropy56 Are you joking?
crocop0514 1 year ago
Wow that's amazing. A four way symbiotic relationship between five different species. Remove any one species, and another would die of starvation.
1.Leafcutter ant