wow that lady was making him look retarded . im only 12 and heres the thing ~ we dont know if they are stong if they are week if they are smart or better or nothing like that for sure but they are proboly pretty smart if they are makign ufos visit earth the reason why they proboly wouldnt invade is becuz of how much we polute the earth ~ they have no use its
poluted they proboly dont want it but now heres the thing, all the teachers and shit say "there cant be life on other planets bcuz its too hott or cold or so much / not enough gravity but what if there is life on other planets just they are made to be able to handle hott cold no / too much gravity so even though we or any of our creatures on earth cant live there what if others can ? of it if
What's with skeptics and their picking the easiest explanation? Sure you can pick the easier explanation but if the evidence points to somthing more complicated then that makes you an idiot for trying to pick the easy way out even though you know the evidence contradicts your conclusion. Skeptics are dumbasses.
theres a slim chance we've been visited/ are being visited by aliens.... Seriously, space is dangerous, and if you think of it, are you that desperate to find another civilization by free riding into uncharted space? you could be zooming around and end up right in a black hole or something, and the universe is huge.... but maybe we are being visited by aliens who knows..
Regardless of whether or not aliens are visiting us (I personally think so), this debate sucked.
I hate it when people put experts in a topic against professional debaters. Not because the debater as any type of advantage in that forum (because obviously this woman in this video did terrible), it just doesn't make for an interesting discussion.
Having a Carl Sagan (rip) or a Bill Nye debate would've been much more legitimate.
One we need a war to keep the money flow two we have halograms/ alien crafts. It is all for us to go to war no peace if we had peace there would be nothing to fight about or no rulers/power play with all our lives
I agree with VanitY... THAT'S a debate champion? Looked more like she was auditioning for Fox News. The basis of her argument seems to be a really short skirt, plenty of makeup, and lots of condescension. The idea that this ENTIRE universe was 'created' for one group of lesser-hirsute chimpanzees is what we should roll our eyes at. There WILL be a day when the idea that we are alone, is seen for what it is... ridiculous, clueless, and arrogantly self-centered.
Intelligently debated? Yes. Convincing? No. In reality, that which she herself presented as the more likely possibility was in and of itself unfallsifiable, she fell victim to her own accusations there. Seemed more like a joke than a serious debate.
Seems more like Stanton Friedman presented the facts and Jen, the famed debate champion, simply provided her philosophical opinion based solely on that which cannot be falsified such as the ludicrous postulation that maybe they are earth based vehicles thus supporting her predetermined position that UFOs are not extraterrestrial in origin.
I watched this debate live. This is six minutes of a thirty-minute debate. Apparently, the editors decided to cut out its integrity.
Stanton's slideshow? A joke--fuzzy UFO pictures we've all seen, photocopies of book covers, and documents of "evidence" with the words blacked out. And Jen's responses (intelligent ones omitted, funnier ones intact) made him backtrack every time.
It's annoying to watch editors change the outcome of an event for the sake of humor and brevity. Drink Jamesons.
Ugh. From the point of view of someone who actually watched this debate as it happened (you'll see me in this piece as Whiskey Drinker 4), this is only -six- minutes of a thirty minute debate. And apparently the editors decided to cut out all of its integrity.
First of all, Stanton's "slideshow" was a joke. All of the fuzzy UFO "pictures" we've all see, photocopiess of book covers, and documents of evidence with all the words blacked out.
This isn't a comedy, although it is light and fun. This is a real debate, and Stanton won easily. The girl gave it a good try, but good debating skill cannot win over the truth presented clearly.
shes known for being good at arguing. hopefully she never gets married. poor guy
TacoBell4LifeYo 7 months ago
someone, somewere, somehow, someone or something has come up with actual words she can use.
CAPIreland1 8 months ago
wow that lady was making him look retarded . im only 12 and heres the thing ~ we dont know if they are stong if they are week if they are smart or better or nothing like that for sure but they are proboly pretty smart if they are makign ufos visit earth the reason why they proboly wouldnt invade is becuz of how much we polute the earth ~ they have no use its
heyheyhey857 10 months ago
poluted they proboly dont want it but now heres the thing, all the teachers and shit say "there cant be life on other planets bcuz its too hott or cold or so much / not enough gravity but what if there is life on other planets just they are made to be able to handle hott cold no / too much gravity so even though we or any of our creatures on earth cant live there what if others can ? of it if
heyheyhey857 10 months ago
What's with skeptics and their picking the easiest explanation? Sure you can pick the easier explanation but if the evidence points to somthing more complicated then that makes you an idiot for trying to pick the easy way out even though you know the evidence contradicts your conclusion. Skeptics are dumbasses.
Skull666Bones 1 year ago
aliens exists, but the strange thing about aliens is, that there is noting strange.
TheGameHive 1 year ago
theres a slim chance we've been visited/ are being visited by aliens.... Seriously, space is dangerous, and if you think of it, are you that desperate to find another civilization by free riding into uncharted space? you could be zooming around and end up right in a black hole or something, and the universe is huge.... but maybe we are being visited by aliens who knows..
Jsoeum94 2 years ago
Regardless of whether or not aliens are visiting us (I personally think so), this debate sucked.
I hate it when people put experts in a topic against professional debaters. Not because the debater as any type of advantage in that forum (because obviously this woman in this video did terrible), it just doesn't make for an interesting discussion.
Having a Carl Sagan (rip) or a Bill Nye debate would've been much more legitimate.
KillYourselfKids 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i wanna fuck that girl
TehManoSteele 3 years ago
why did stanton friedman even bother going to this debate. it seems all the people other than him are skeptic ignorant assholes
TheDopeCru 3 years ago
LOL - Jen 2 time champ?!? FAIL!
EVETyrant 3 years ago
This is UFO propaganda. She's an actress you fools!
torin006 3 years ago
One we need a war to keep the money flow two we have halograms/ alien crafts. It is all for us to go to war no peace if we had peace there would be nothing to fight about or no rulers/power play with all our lives
startrayenok 4 years ago
I agree with VanitY... THAT'S a debate champion? Looked more like she was auditioning for Fox News. The basis of her argument seems to be a really short skirt, plenty of makeup, and lots of condescension. The idea that this ENTIRE universe was 'created' for one group of lesser-hirsute chimpanzees is what we should roll our eyes at. There WILL be a day when the idea that we are alone, is seen for what it is... ridiculous, clueless, and arrogantly self-centered.
CO2Junkie 4 years ago 5
Agreed.
LogicalSkeptic 4 years ago
Intelligently debated? Yes. Convincing? No. In reality, that which she herself presented as the more likely possibility was in and of itself unfallsifiable, she fell victim to her own accusations there. Seemed more like a joke than a serious debate.
VanitYNValoR 4 years ago
Seems more like Stanton Friedman presented the facts and Jen, the famed debate champion, simply provided her philosophical opinion based solely on that which cannot be falsified such as the ludicrous postulation that maybe they are earth based vehicles thus supporting her predetermined position that UFOs are not extraterrestrial in origin.
VanitYNValoR 4 years ago
I watched this debate live. This is six minutes of a thirty-minute debate. Apparently, the editors decided to cut out its integrity.
Stanton's slideshow? A joke--fuzzy UFO pictures we've all seen, photocopies of book covers, and documents of "evidence" with the words blacked out. And Jen's responses (intelligent ones omitted, funnier ones intact) made him backtrack every time.
It's annoying to watch editors change the outcome of an event for the sake of humor and brevity. Drink Jamesons.
mimccl 5 years ago
Ugh. From the point of view of someone who actually watched this debate as it happened (you'll see me in this piece as Whiskey Drinker 4), this is only -six- minutes of a thirty minute debate. And apparently the editors decided to cut out all of its integrity.
First of all, Stanton's "slideshow" was a joke. All of the fuzzy UFO "pictures" we've all see, photocopiess of book covers, and documents of evidence with all the words blacked out.
mimccl 5 years ago
I was at that debate. Without editing, Jen won!... but I still hope for aliens!
Illustrae 5 years ago
Nice legs, Jen.
JazzyJawn 5 years ago
"I'm down with that"? I weep for our future.
spec24 5 years ago
She's a debate champion? God have mercy on our education system.
spec24 5 years ago
ufos are total bullshit. As if they'd just zoom around and not make any contact.
tattypatty 5 years ago
A true intellectual in our midst.
spec24 5 years ago
they shud have been drunker.
bettyx1138 5 years ago
Yep she got owned... she needs more experience in this phenomena to survive this debate.
RamzGT 5 years ago
This isn't a comedy, although it is light and fun. This is a real debate, and Stanton won easily. The girl gave it a good try, but good debating skill cannot win over the truth presented clearly.
rldipaolo 5 years ago