Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They could easily make these machines far more secure from tampering so that anyone doing so would leave noticeable damage to the case...

    O,,,

  • So, why can't we get people to hack into the machines and skew the votes FOR Ron Paul? Why are there plenty of hackers willing to rig the machines in favor of morons, rich bastards, and religious nuts like Gingrich, Romney, and Santorum?

  • STOP Talking and start protesting - Get this knowledge mainstream. Every CAUCUS will be rigged to ensure Ron Paul gains no further support. They are using the results and the mass media to destroy voter morale. Isnt it odd that nobody supports Gingrich or Santorum on the streets but they get heaps of votes. You have been robbed America. These machines will steal your election, your country your freedoms.

  • It's all a circus show. Elections have been rigged for quite some time now.

  • "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." Josef Stalin

  • Paper ballots again, at least they would have to physically go through all of them to pick the ones they dont like out

  • Yeah, you don’t have to do anything, except OPEN THE WHOLE MACHINE AND PUT IN A CIRCUIT BOARD! LOL, this is so far from reality, it’s not even funny.

    Good luck skewing a dozen votes that way, while I change the final result at the central system where it all comes together. FAIL

  • Byebye freedom of the vote. This country sucks more and more everyday.

  • This and much other evidence shows the need to maintain paper ballots counted by hand in the presence of a watcher from both parties.Yes it's slower, but at least you can somewhat trust the results.

  • Start 9:00

  • Oh hum, another scary story about “POTENTIALLY”! (They use that word twice in their intro) NO FACTS that it’s been done. Why not? They would first have to burglarize the place where the machines are kept. Once in, they would have to break the seals on the machine (a sure gave-a-way to officials). Then install their "alien electronics." If caught, they would get prison time for multiple felonies. For what? To change a few votes on one DRE? Search: The Slippery Slope as a Scary Story

  • PLEASE anyone can tell me what the name of the first song that plays in this video??? THANKS

  • @matheuso86 Sorry. No idea!

  • @groov539 Please feel free to demonstrate any "fraud" carried out by Al Franken or his campaign. As to the voting machine companies, even though these machines make cheating by any insider very easy, you do realize most of them are huge supporters of the Republican Party, right? The CEO of Diebold in 2004 was a Bush pioneer who vowed "to deliver the electoral votes to" George W. Bush in Ohio, in a Republican fund raising letter. Just so's ya know, my friend. Hope that helps!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Oh, so that explains how Obama got elected. I always knew deep down that the majority of the country wasn't that stupid. 20% maybe, but not over half.

  • I live in Texas where these voting machines are used. Is there a way of visually detecting when a machine has been tampered with? (Visual blanking of the screen during the voting process?)

  • @jbd2553 If a hack is done correctly, there will be no way of visually knowing that it has occurred. That's the danger. Folks in TX should be outraged they are given these machines to vote on down there.

  • No problem, Obama will hire SEIU & ACORN workers to secure these machines.

  • @BarryDead That'd be high-larious if the machines weren't already "secured" by members of your party. But I guess you're cool with that, right?

  • @TheBRADBLOG What party has illegals, the dead & Mickey Mouse voting? What Party rounds up dummies and gives them a pack of smoke, box lunch, bus ride to voting polls & tells them how to vote?

  • @BarryDead Um, none that I know of. Though I appreciate that you've likely been disinformed to the contrary by folks who are playing you for an idiot. But feel free to demonstrate otherwise. At the same time, you may wish to check which party is attempting to keep MILLIONS of legal voters from being able to cast their legal vote at all. That is MUCH easier to find and actual verify as accurate. But knock urself out either way, champ.

  • @TheBRADBLOG It is not my job to educate you. Google ACORN voting fraud, that would be a good start. And keep in mind Obama gave them 800K ........

  • @BarryDead No. It's my job to educate YOU, apparently. I have been reporting on ACORN for *years*, in media outlets across the globe. Since you're an expert too, I'm sure you realize that there is no evidence that any illegal vote has EVER been cast by "Mickey Mouse" or anybody else, in ANY election, ANYWHERE from ANY improper registration by an ACORN worker. You DO know that, right? Of course you do.

  • @TheBRADBLOG You are correct, Mickey Mouse didn't vote. But my *Tax* dollars shouldn't go to a Democrat front group that is totally corrupt. Can name a right wing group that gets tax money and tampered with the voting registrations? Because I can go on all day Google La Raza voting fraud

  • @BarryDead ACORN is neither a "Democrat front group", nor did they "tamper with the voting registrations". How long do you want to keep being wrong about stuff here? I'll got all day.

  • nothing new. why even bother with these machines when we all know the technology is effed up to begin with? voting officials are already bought off and manufactures, all one of them, dont give a shit.

  • THIS THING OF OURS

  • Truely horrific video editing. Whoa.

  • Can we buy this for DIEBOLD ATMs?

  • Florida 2000.

    Ohio 2004.

  • this is just so sick

  • ...and the idiots continue to insist, the machines are secure.

  • Since "Diebold Election Systems" was acquired by "Premiere Election Solutions" and then by "ES&S" and then by "Dominion," I wonder what changes have been made if any ... worth investigating, no?

  • that is freaking amazing!

  • @MrHyperar your analogy is terrible. If there were encrypted streams or proper authentication between the interface and CPU, these attacks would not be possible. If the interfaces were soldered instead of having quick disconnects, this could not be done. This IS disturbing, as they said, these machines are often kept in insecure areas.

  • and people wonder why i don't bother voting..

  • What I don't get is, where are OUR hackers? Why doesn't someone hack the goddamn machines and make Ron Paul win? We're at war against the elite, so anything goes!

  • @politicoochie09 Check out xkcd's "secretary" series, comics 494-497

  • @politicoochie09 because that would cause another controversy like we had in Florida in 2000 with the hanging chads. do you really want Ron Paul to be disqualified? No? Then shut the F up. Don't give anyone new ideas for FALSE FLAG elections! :(

  • Look numb nuts. The whole point in these illustrating videos is to prove that these machines can and most likely have been rigged in previous elections. There's no paper trail or anonymous receipt with number on it. Your criticism of these guys is juvenile.

  • I recommend skipping ahead to 09:00

  • Interesting video but seriously lacks brevity.

  • So, basically, you don't need SOFTWARE knowledge, but you need, to buy parts, build your own integrated circuit, get it inside the machine. Those people in the video should be ashame, this is embarrasing, you call this "disturbing"?, it's more "imaginary". This is like saying, check this out, if i put a bomb on a car it could explode, its disturbing...

    I just registered in youtube to tell you go fuck yourselves.

  • @MrHyperar Vote tampering shouldn't be as easy as car bombing. There are people with the knowledge and will to perform these attacks, and the result could be much worse than a car bombing.

  • You two guys look like some eighth grade science jocks.

  • Have there been tamper-evident seals developed that are truly difficult or impossible to defeat? I know previous researchers have found that most were easily defeated.

  • @throwbacknigger From my conversations with the scientists at Argonne, it's not the seals that need to be improved per se, as you are right about the ease of defeating the existing seals that are used. It's the machines themselves that would need to be better designed to accommodate the seals. Such as holes to put more permanent seals through, etc.

  • @TheBRADBLOG the actual problem is that these machines are designed to steal votes, why do you think they won't allow congress to inspect the machines or have access to the schematics?

  • well hell. 

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more