Why are some people just utterly retarded? Komrad Hall you are that retard, This was not, will not and never shall be a Tsarist March and it are people like you that I despice not because you are ruining the song but because you mock the Tsar.
@PrisonerNumber7 For one thing, Nietzsche, Einstein, Kierkegaard, and Jackson all had autism. Secondly, you are saying that I have a mental illness because I judge people as individuals, rather than hating millions of people I have never met. Also, Buber, Einstein, Spinoza, and Hrussel were all Jews. You're amongst the lowest humans in existence. I hope you are beaten to death by a truckload of Zionists, you fucking poor excuse for a human. As you are unworthy of further comment, I'll stop here.
Look in your heart and you find the answer to mankinds problems. It is true - you know it, but you're just to lazy and arrogant to admit it. This has to change. Communism is a gift to mankind!
this version is communist... the real version hasnt letter and was military anthem of the white army who fought soviet revolution in russian civil war.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭
Look in your heart and you find the answer to mankinds problems. It is true - you know it, but you're just to lazy and arrogant to admit it. This has to change. Communism is a gift to mankind!
@JamesDestry1 it is written with "Ц" = ts , but I agree, there is no letter in english to exactly define that letter. but trust me, I know how it sounds. because one of my native languages (mingrelian) includes that letter.
@LEOPARDTWO Lenin wasn'at a mass murderer Stalin was. A "good" country can only stand for so long before it corrupts. The Empire was good for a few 100 years but then came Nicholis II who didn't give a shit about his people. The came the soviet union. It was started in 1922 and became corrupt when stalin took power in 1924. America also was good until a certain time. Then the government became evil
@supermariobubba nicholas may have cared, but his upbringing left him very out of touch with what modern life was. he was simply a dude put in an absolute autocratic system that didnt work anymore.
@WolfytheWolf5667 As I understand, the industrial capacity of the Russian Empire was rapidly expanding under Nicholas's reign, and, had it not been consumed by Revolution in 1917, would've been on the same level as the United Kingdom, possibly even the US within a few decades.
With that in-mind, the people of Russia were starving because of Revolution, not because of the Tsar. The Tsar was betrayed. The Revolutionaries had done everything that you have blamed the Tsar for.
@NLFonsseals No, the song was based on the Song of the RJW. In WWI there was also these lyrics: On the uneven roads of Galicia Raising the June dust Squadrons went into battle in lines Pushing down the grass on the road Farewell Mother Russia! Tomorrow we will go in battle! We are going to defend Your borders and your calmness! Hot gun barrels, and fountains of fire The squadron is attacking right now In the trenches, positions and enemy rear You could hear the sound of our swords
You know, this was an anti-war song. I know that this couldn't be lyricsa by he sound of the song. Sad, defeated..... I know how to apply logics to war marches. I just said the lyrics that basically sum up the truth of war.
@NLFonsseals You know, somehow this song with its "defeated sounding" melody was found a "calling to war" song for almost a century.
I've heard Agapkin could have took part of the old RJW song and incorporated in his piece, interesting how much he changed it, but the other half of the song is purely his.
And the way the song sounds is quite different for everyone. The song we are discussing had also a "Sacred War" sounding in the White Army version.
@NLFonsseals No. The Anti-War song had part of itself incorporated in the song made by Agapkin. And the whole story of it being an anti-war song is presented by one musical specialist in a quite old age. And even he said the lyrics are not full. And he si the only one who says this.
@komradhall What? WHAT??? How do you explain these wodrs of "Tsarist Military Anthem: "Who defended Moscow in the 41? Who marched to Berlin with a Victory?" Really, WHO? )))
PS Here is - watch?v=VGn8Dai9jWo - a original version of song (i.e. the real tsarist anthem)
@dystopianlover Fact is that the soviets used it far more. It was sung by the red army orchestra during WW2. It was only unnoficialy the anthem of Kolchak's army, and never the official anthem of the Tsar.
@ThiefFanatic It's a Tsarist song and it has not been recorded how often (if at all) the Tsarist Russians sung this song. Have a good time attempting to refute that point.
You have no basis for your assertations. Although one of your facts is correct, you cannot base others off it with no proof.
@dystopianlover Nonsense, comrade. It has been sung by the red army orchestras for as long as I can remember. I once heard it in a soviet film. It was even included in official collections of Red Army orchestra music.
@dystopianlover I never said that the Tsarists didn't sing it, I even said that it was the unofficial anthem of Kolchak's white army... but that was it! It was never anything official in the Tsarist regime not a "Military anthem" as this video states. Only during the CCCP did it become a real military march.
@ThiefFanatic During the times of the USSR, it was not played. It was first written down on an American Gramophone disc in 1944 for the Americans, but the march was first played officially in the USSR in the movie "The Cranes Fly".
While in Czarist Russia there were numerous variations. One of them was called "On the bumpy hills of Galicia".
I agree guys! GO FASCISM! GO IMPERIALISM! FUCK the Serfs! FUCK the Jews! FUCK the REFORMERS! FUCK THE INTELLECTUALS! FUCK the Poor! FUCK the Weak! FUCK EVERYONE THE SOVIET IDEAL DEFENDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@WWLinkMasterX My friend you are in extremly mislead, the Tzar & Tzarist Russia was all about the people, faith ( Orthodoxy) and honor. The Soviets didnt stand for the people what so ever, and that can be seen clearly throughout history. They were supported by the Germans( during WW1) and even later during the civil war by the AMERICANS ( finacialy). What was the ponit you may ask...to destory the most power increasing contry in the world, Russia. Where you got " GO FASCISM" from I dont know??
@ThiefFanatic 1. That was a different Czar,and what did Alaska have when it was sold? The American President was nearly thrown off his place for "buying useless land which had nothing except ice"
2.Have you heard of a man by the name of Peter Rutenberg? He was planning to murder the Czar if they met face to face.
3. Wait a minute! In statement 2 you said that he did the wrong thing when he fought the revolution. So, should have he fought criminals and German spies that made revolts or not?
@KnyazSuvorov His people was starving and he didn't care about it - FACT! During a peaceful protest the army started shooting at the crowd! PEACEFUL PROTEST!
@ThiefFanatic His people were starving? How could they be starving if an average Russian family would have FIVE children? How could his people afford this if they were starving? And do you have proof that the Czar didn't care about his subjects?
A peaceful protest? You call an attempt of murder on the head of the country and a revolt a peaceful protest?
@KnyazSuvorov That is such nonsense. Each Albanian family has averagely 10 children, yet Albania is one of the poorest countries in Europe. Africans have many children, yet Africa is the poorest continent in the world. Usually, the LESS children an average family has, the richer the country is. If you want to murder the Czar, you don't go parading in the streets.
@ThiefFanatic Well the people didn't raise a revolt. Moreso the ones who were truly Russian people went against these rebels. Together with the help of the lawful government they overran the rebels and restored proper order.
@KnyazSuvorov Sure, the cossacks and jews were in the protests in the streets of Moscow...suuuuuuuuuuuuuuure.
Restored proper order? You mean by losing the war? The whites only had 500 000 troops less than the reds, and they had the allies on their side and better equipment. Yet they still lost.
@ThiefFanatic Wait wait wait! We have been talking about 1905 with the Czar. NOT THE CIVIL WAR WITH THE WHITES AND REDS! There is a difference between that.
@KnyazSuvorov I know, but the point still remains that the Czar's soldiers shot unarmed protesters, and ever since the people decided to go for armed revolution, he was doomed.
What a beautiful march! What a pity the soviets used it in their (opposite) context. I´m a finn and I think that Kolchak should have accepted the offer of the Finnish army to support the attack to st.peterburg. If Kolchak just had accepted the independency of Finland we had supported the Romanov regime. 30 years after the Kolchak rejection russians saw how hard finns can be as soldiers ;)
@marcusantonius90 im am decendent of the TSAR s adviser ..my family fled with my great great grand father s ship and he went is germany to fight to free soviet RUSSIA
@itsahypocriticalword is there some were where i mention that im proud ..and even if the germans weren t coming to free germany im proud that my great grandfather fought with the thought in his head that he was fighting to free his country from a regime where his people were killed every day because they stood up for what was right ...where did i mention that russia did not suffer ...can u see that im am replying to someone im not declaring that randomly ...whats ur problem
@THEOFIRE99 yap yap yap... are you trying to say that lebensraum plans Hitler had for EU part of USSR of leaving about 30 mil people is some kind of goodwill gesture? Just accept that your grandfarther was a fashist and from your comment volantarily. The worst kind that is.
@Atomicomet ho is the real traitor , your grandfather served a mad control freak and my great grand father served the family ho ruled there for 400 years , he did not bow down for his life , he fought even for a dead name , what did Communism bring today to our country , if nicolay had stay , the country would not have been in shit like today , fuck this fuking lenin , for his need to control , he destroyed a peice of our our beloved home for ever
@Atomicomet what u say has no sense because you are the real traitor ho converted for your life , if you want the perfect example of the of the Communist-brain-washed-citizen , here it is
@THEOFIRE99 i think that not for Russian Communist revolution or Stalin , Hitler would have won the war with the Slav people and their would be no Slavs today. The Czar's Russia was too corrupt to have withstood Nazi Germany. There was a lot of Soviet crimes committed and Stalin partook in some of them , But all revolutions have injustices as well as any society of any politico or economical system.
@korz53 The Germans did not lead a war to destroy all slavs, they led a war to fight communism, which was the ideological enemy of nazism. They even had a lot of help by former white army soldiers and other Russian enemies of communism, and the Baltic nations saw the Germans as liberators but still led guerrilla actions against Soviets after 1945.
With the Czar, the Germans might not even have attacked Russia. And even though the Nazi regime did a lot of bad things, the Soviets were a lot worse
@JarlFrank Google HITLER'S PLANS FOR EASTERN EUROPE .dac.neu.edu/holocaust/Hitlers_Plans.htm
( under = SLAV NATIONS & under = PLANS FOR THE POLISH NATION. His book Mein Kampf incriminates him on many of his crimes that he implemented after he started the wars as to implement his ideas of that book .
I don't think you understand the situation that was right before the revolution.
There was a country wide famine. The daily amount of bread the people ate was 100 grams. Lenin was an extreme patriot. He worked politically every day and had some very good ideas. But Stalin came to power and fucked it all up by being even worse than the tsar in oppressing the people. The only reason there wasn't another revolution was because he was good at making patriots, and damn good at that.
@THEOFIRE99 300 years. and the zar starved the people to death....
the sovjets did some terrible thing too but the zar was worse..
and Lenin was a great man but his "comrade" Stalin and his fellows destroyed Sovjet Union and im sorry for that.. fuck Stalin but not Lenin.. Lenin didnt liked Stalin...
@THEOFIRE99 300 years. and the zar starved the people to death....
the sovjets did some terrible thing too but the zar was worse..
and Lenin was a great man but his "comrade" Stalin and his fellows destroyed Sovjet Union and im sorry for that.. fuck Stalin but not Lenin.. Lenin didnt liked Stalin...
@2kaliban And in much less than 300 years, communists completely trashed Russia.
Did the TSAR (not zar...) cause mass malnutrition? Look at Ukraine.
The tsar didn't even discriminate against different ethnicities as the Soviets did. Look at Armenia. Peter I welcomed the Armenians with open arms, and wanted them to be welcome in the Russian Empire.
@MrIhatesafetymode If you're such a communist you are not allowed to believe in God . Saying this in the reign of Stalin would earn you a nice 10 years in Siberia .
@MrIhatesafetymode You claim that the Tsar killed more people then Lenin. Prove it ?Unfortunately you cannot do such a thing since that claim is ahistorical rubbish. Nicholas II executed very few of his subjects, and when he did, he usually had a good reason. Unless you were a member of a left wing terrorist organization, you had nothing to fear from the tsar.
@ImperialRussianGuard Excuse me? Very few? Good reasons? What school did you go too!? Remember bloody sunday, the Tsar ordered the death of millions of non violent protesters! Call that a good reason? How could you support a cruel murderer like him? Who will you say killed people for good reasons next? Osama Bin Laden? Hitler? Gaddafi? All just a evil as your satanic leader known as the tsar. No wonder his supporters where sent to mental homes.
@MrIhatesafetymode Bloody sunday was not ordered by the tsar. He was not even in St. Petersburg when it occurred. The officer who ordered the troops to fire, had no authorization from any higher authority. There is no evidence that Nicholas II ordered bloody sunday. Instead of indignant rhetoric, could you please provide some facts or statistics to back up your claims.
@MrIhatesafetymode Not only was Nicholas II not in St. Petersburg when Bloody Sunday occurred, he personally sent letters to the families of the victims upon his return. The Tsar had nothing to do with that event, but it sadly crippled his credibility and was unjustly used by the Bolsheviks as propaganda against the Empire.
@supermariobubba The annual agricultural output was greater than that of the growth rate of the population. Also death rates fell in the reign of Nicholas II. Why would that happen if people were starving ?
Yes, people were starving because Nicholas II stole bread.
From Russians, his own people. Try and defend him, but I ask, where is the bread? where was their industrial plants under Nicholas? Why did he order the death of 50 Russians (i mean by crowd firing, not genocide like Stalin.)
Let's face it. Since Russia didn't like him, that means Nicholas was a dictator. And NOT the good kind like Caesar.
@WolfytheWolf5667 You still have not been able to adress my statement. I have provided you with facts which contradict you point, however you responded with rhetoric. Very well, let me ask this question again. If so many people were dying from starvation, then why did the death rates fall ande life expectancy grow under Nicholas II ? If people were did not have enough food, logically then the statistics would show that.
This is the 1970s version of "Farewell of Slavianka" (Прощание славянки). Although it was written in soviet times, its lyrics bear no resemblance to those periods.
soviet version
southeastatheist 6 days ago
It is a very beautiful song. It is very Russian, and if there is something the Russians can do, it is to perform such great music.
Kimse84 1 month ago
This is the Soviet version.
Qrawzseg 1 month ago
Long live Stalingrad heroes! Best wishes from Serbia!
AleksMaric1 1 month ago
one thing that i must admit, eastern Europeans are damn amazing at making anthems and patriotic songs!
ChemicalCorpse1 2 months ago
hvide hæriske militantiske foræddere...
Lenin gjorde det rette..
DKP!
2kaliban 2 months ago
Why are some people just utterly retarded? Komrad Hall you are that retard, This was not, will not and never shall be a Tsarist March and it are people like you that I despice not because you are ruining the song but because you mock the Tsar.
Glory To The Tsar!!!!!
sillie3332 3 months ago
Certified Intergalactic!
Dogaradodia 3 months ago
Death to Communism. To hell with the Jews. Glory to sons of Europe, East and West.
PrisonerNumber7 3 months ago
@PrisonerNumber7 FUCK U, THE JEWS ARE FUCKING AWESOME!
vladpros2000 3 months ago
@vladpros2000 LOL
PrisonerNumber7 3 months ago
Comment removed
JamesDestry1 3 months ago in playlist JamesDestry1's favorites
@PrisonerNumber7 People like you are an embaressment to the human race. Hating Jews just for being Jews is wrong. Go fuck yourself.
JamesDestry1 3 months ago
@JamesDestry1
Autism. You got it.
PrisonerNumber7 3 months ago
Comment removed
JamesDestry1 3 months ago in playlist JamesDestry1's favorites
This has been flagged as spam show
@PrisonerNumber7 For one thing, Nietzsche, Einstein, Kierkegaard, and Jackson all had autism. Secondly, you are saying that I have a mental illness because I judge people as individuals, rather than hating millions of people I have never met. Also, Buber, Einstein, Spinoza, and Hrussel were all Jews. You're amongst the lowest humans in existence. I hope you are beaten to death by a truckload of Zionists, you fucking poor excuse for a human. As you are unworthy of further comment, I'll stop here.
JamesDestry1 3 months ago
@PrisonerNumber7
You don't even know what autism is, do you?
YoshiTheBlue 3 months ago
In point of fact, the lyrics sung here are the Red Army lyrics composed to commemorate the victory of Hitler.
Even without the original 1912 lyrics, I suppose it's right to call it a Tsarist anthem.
pablononescobar 3 months ago
@pablononescobar Sorry, I meant to say "victory OVER Hitler" don't want to give praise to that loser
pablononescobar 3 months ago
@pablononescobar Of course not, that would be politicaly incorrect and such behavior can make people to loose their lemminghood.
guderianheinz 3 months ago
U RA !
VendPrekmurec 3 months ago
Glory to the White Army and all the foreign volunteers who fought with her!
BytheBeardofYmir 3 months ago
Переключатель Сталина к Ленину.
JohnVicres 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭
Look in your heart and you find the answer to mankinds problems. It is true - you know it, but you're just to lazy and arrogant to admit it. This has to change. Communism is a gift to mankind!
LOVE LIVE COMMUNISM!
HAIL STALIN! HAIL MAO! HAIL MARX! BANZAI!
Let's re-ignite the fire of REVOLUTION!
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭
JohnVicres 3 months ago
К черту с самодержец и его миньонов! Да здравствует Ленин!
JohnVicres 3 months ago
My favriot march. White army is awasome
mistergutsy19 4 months ago
Oh great,..... it sounds so awesome, I can't stop replaying it....and I have to do homework! LOL!
aabceacba 4 months ago
This isn't the real one
VV2k10 4 months ago
this isn't a tsarist march but a bolchevic march.
HubertWolfen 4 months ago
@HubertWolfen I thing the person who created this video doesnt underdstand Russian. He got the two versions of Farewell Slavianka mixed up.
jdi0093113 4 months ago
God save the tszar nicolas II and al the other romanovs
tinton08568 4 months ago
Oh really? Tsarist? This is Soviet edition, song about WW2. This is not Tsarist Farewell.
clouster75 5 months ago
long live russian white army
salut from white finland
MultiNirvana69 5 months ago
this version is communist... the real version hasnt letter and was military anthem of the white army who fought soviet revolution in russian civil war.
mrostion1 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭
Look in your heart and you find the answer to mankinds problems. It is true - you know it, but you're just to lazy and arrogant to admit it. This has to change. Communism is a gift to mankind!
LOVE LIVE COMMUNISM!
HAIL STALIN! HAIL MAO! HAIL MARX! BANZAI!
Let's re-ignite the fire of REVOLUTION!
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭
RedUnity 5 months ago
@RedUnity You push idiocy to the max degree.
posharow 5 months ago 5
It is spelled CZar. not TSar. Get it right.
JamesDestry1 5 months ago
@JamesDestry1 well most say Tsar not Czar
Trillios 5 months ago
@Trillios They're still wrong. It's Czar. Americanizing russian words is wrong. It's Czar.
JamesDestry1 5 months ago
@JamesDestry1 indeed, looking at the cryllic version its a no-brainer
Trillios 5 months ago
@JamesDestry1 Russianizing Latin words is wrong. It's Caesar.
Trully006 4 months ago
@Trully006 this is typical occult nonsense... Tsar in ancient Slavic language means "The royal one".
VendPrekmurec 3 months ago
@JamesDestry1 it is written with "Ц" = ts , but I agree, there is no letter in english to exactly define that letter. but trust me, I know how it sounds. because one of my native languages (mingrelian) includes that letter.
molenini 4 months ago in playlist molenini's Favorited Videos
@Flyguy12397
the original is by the white army. I don't really see any change in the USSR version.
WolfytheWolf5667 6 months ago
nothing to do with the tsar?!It was written for the Russian Imperial Army to encourage it in the balkan wars
DE1VOLK1 6 months ago
Wtf this has nothing to do with the Tsar.
xCCCPCLANx 6 months ago
this ain't the tsarist version, it's the soviet one. Both are great though.
Sliniak5 7 months ago
Lenin? A mass murderer. Stay in hell where you belong.
LEOPARDTWO 7 months ago
@LEOPARDTWO Lenin wasn'at a mass murderer Stalin was. A "good" country can only stand for so long before it corrupts. The Empire was good for a few 100 years but then came Nicholis II who didn't give a shit about his people. The came the soviet union. It was started in 1922 and became corrupt when stalin took power in 1924. America also was good until a certain time. Then the government became evil
supermariobubba 7 months ago
@supermariobubba nicholas may have cared, but his upbringing left him very out of touch with what modern life was. he was simply a dude put in an absolute autocratic system that didnt work anymore.
mackshayster 7 months ago
@LEOPARDTWO name a genocide commited by Lenin
TheRiverVolga 6 months ago
do not fight between yourselves, that's how the russian empire was defeated.... be united....
jovicans 7 months ago
@FallenComrades Agreed, the Czarist government was corrupt and uncaring of its people.
Long live Lenin.
TheAuditer2009 8 months ago
@TheAuditer2009 Me too.
MrIhatesafetymode 7 months ago
The Tsar is returning, and there is nothing defeated and despised Communism can do about it....God Save the Tsar!
TheEnglishpaladin 8 months ago
@TheEnglishpaladin
yes that's why Russia didn't support him.
WHERE WAS THE BREAD HE PROMISED RUSSIA? Why did Children die in the streets? why did he lose to a patheticly-weak Austro-hungarian empire?
The USSR had good reasons to invade Poland. THEY JOINED GERMANY IN WW1. Thus making them EVIL.
WolfytheWolf5667 6 months ago
@WolfytheWolf5667 As I understand, the industrial capacity of the Russian Empire was rapidly expanding under Nicholas's reign, and, had it not been consumed by Revolution in 1917, would've been on the same level as the United Kingdom, possibly even the US within a few decades.
With that in-mind, the people of Russia were starving because of Revolution, not because of the Tsar. The Tsar was betrayed. The Revolutionaries had done everything that you have blamed the Tsar for.
TheEnglishpaladin 6 months ago
this is revilution. not thet pig of a tsar.
firnov 8 months ago
Long live Tzarist Russia, yet to come!!!
vukasinhajin 8 months ago 2
I swear to God, this is not a Tzar song.
Communismcomrade 8 months ago
I love this march.
Menydh01 9 months ago
Not necessary a Tsarist anthem, considering that its composer joined the Red Army during Revolution and the Civil War.
timfidotru 1 year ago
Господа, вопрос:
Пелся ли этот марш во время песнопений солдат в Императорской Армии?
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
"on moskvu otstoyal v '41om..."
The tzar was long gone by '41
Tony1584 1 year ago
@Tony1584 New Lyrics. It was even an anti-war song from the Russo-Jap war
Oh, why have they drafted us
And now are rushing us to the Far East?
Is it my fault
That I have grown another 2 inches?
My legs or my arms will get blown off,
They will carry me away on a stretcher,
And for all this terrible suffering
I will be presented with the Saint George's Cross...
NLFonsseals 1 year ago
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@KnyazSuvorov *sigh*.....
You know, this was an anti-war song. I know that this couldn't be lyricsa by he sound of the song. Sad, defeated..... I know how to apply logics to war marches. I just said the lyrics that basically sum up the truth of war.
NLFonsseals 1 year ago
@NLFonsseals You know, somehow this song with its "defeated sounding" melody was found a "calling to war" song for almost a century.
I've heard Agapkin could have took part of the old RJW song and incorporated in his piece, interesting how much he changed it, but the other half of the song is purely his.
And the way the song sounds is quite different for everyone. The song we are discussing had also a "Sacred War" sounding in the White Army version.
And a "determined" sound in the WWI version.
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@KnyazSuvorov I know what it was ment for, i ment that the anti-war song was in the lyrics. Like every song.
NLFonsseals 1 year ago
@NLFonsseals Sounds different when you change the lyrics
NLFonsseals 1 year ago
@NLFonsseals No. The Anti-War song had part of itself incorporated in the song made by Agapkin. And the whole story of it being an anti-war song is presented by one musical specialist in a quite old age. And even he said the lyrics are not full. And he si the only one who says this.
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@komradhall What? WHAT??? How do you explain these wodrs of "Tsarist Military Anthem: "Who defended Moscow in the 41? Who marched to Berlin with a Victory?" Really, WHO? )))
PS Here is - watch?v=VGn8Dai9jWo - a original version of song (i.e. the real tsarist anthem)
AtollRu 1 year ago
Comment removed
THEOFIRE99 1 year ago
GOOD!I LIKE IT!
hsbc820 1 year ago
GOOD!
hsbc820 1 year ago
Unusual that you put a GOW screenshot at the beginning, but still a good video. It is a fantastic song.
crysiseternity 1 year ago
The communists used this far more than the tzarists.
GO CCCP!
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic Historical accuracy is not exactly your forté, is it?
dystopianlover 1 year ago
@dystopianlover Fact is that the soviets used it far more. It was sung by the red army orchestra during WW2. It was only unnoficialy the anthem of Kolchak's army, and never the official anthem of the Tsar.
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic It's a Tsarist song and it has not been recorded how often (if at all) the Tsarist Russians sung this song. Have a good time attempting to refute that point.
You have no basis for your assertations. Although one of your facts is correct, you cannot base others off it with no proof.
Good day, Communist sympathizer.
dystopianlover 1 year ago
@dystopianlover Nonsense, comrade. It has been sung by the red army orchestras for as long as I can remember. I once heard it in a soviet film. It was even included in official collections of Red Army orchestra music.
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic Good job attempting to get me mad.
So, you were alive during the times of Tsar Nicolas II? I salute your mental posterity!
They didn't have cinema with audio during Tsar Nicolas II's era. Soviet cinema argument has been adequately refuted.
I already admitted that the Soviets and the USSR played it. Does that mean the Tsarist forces didn't?
due to lack of sufficient historical evidence for either side, I can't see why you're so vehement about this, Comrade.
dystopianlover 1 year ago
@dystopianlover I never said that the Tsarists didn't sing it, I even said that it was the unofficial anthem of Kolchak's white army... but that was it! It was never anything official in the Tsarist regime not a "Military anthem" as this video states. Only during the CCCP did it become a real military march.
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic This ends now, Stalin!
dystopianlover 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic During the times of the USSR, it was not played. It was first written down on an American Gramophone disc in 1944 for the Americans, but the march was first played officially in the USSR in the movie "The Cranes Fly".
While in Czarist Russia there were numerous variations. One of them was called "On the bumpy hills of Galicia".
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
a beautiful song.
dappana 1 year ago
I agree guys! GO FASCISM! GO IMPERIALISM! FUCK the Serfs! FUCK the Jews! FUCK the REFORMERS! FUCK THE INTELLECTUALS! FUCK the Poor! FUCK the Weak! FUCK EVERYONE THE SOVIET IDEAL DEFENDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WWLinkMasterX 1 year ago
@WWLinkMasterX My friend you are in extremly mislead, the Tzar & Tzarist Russia was all about the people, faith ( Orthodoxy) and honor. The Soviets didnt stand for the people what so ever, and that can be seen clearly throughout history. They were supported by the Germans( during WW1) and even later during the civil war by the AMERICANS ( finacialy). What was the ponit you may ask...to destory the most power increasing contry in the world, Russia. Where you got " GO FASCISM" from I dont know??
vukasinhajin 1 year ago
@vukasinhajin Wait, let's see what the Tzar did for the people:
1. He allowed Alaska to be sold - that's just plain stupid.
2. He massacred the people when they went to the streets in peaceful protest.
3. He was too stupid to even NOTICE that a revolution was going to bring him down because he thought himself a god.
Lenin was 100 % right when he brought the bastard down, only that Stalin perverted his vision.
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic 1. That was a different Czar,and what did Alaska have when it was sold? The American President was nearly thrown off his place for "buying useless land which had nothing except ice"
2.Have you heard of a man by the name of Peter Rutenberg? He was planning to murder the Czar if they met face to face.
3. Wait a minute! In statement 2 you said that he did the wrong thing when he fought the revolution. So, should have he fought criminals and German spies that made revolts or not?
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@KnyazSuvorov His people was starving and he didn't care about it - FACT! During a peaceful protest the army started shooting at the crowd! PEACEFUL PROTEST!
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic His people were starving? How could they be starving if an average Russian family would have FIVE children? How could his people afford this if they were starving? And do you have proof that the Czar didn't care about his subjects?
A peaceful protest? You call an attempt of murder on the head of the country and a revolt a peaceful protest?
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@KnyazSuvorov That is such nonsense. Each Albanian family has averagely 10 children, yet Albania is one of the poorest countries in Europe. Africans have many children, yet Africa is the poorest continent in the world. Usually, the LESS children an average family has, the richer the country is. If you want to murder the Czar, you don't go parading in the streets.
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic Sweety, there is a difference between now and then. And Russians slightly differ from Africans and Albanians, if you haven't known.
And my grandparents could barely afford ONE child when the Soviets were in power, despite both of them having University diplomas in construction.
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@KnyazSuvorov It's always the poor people who have the most children if they are able to (biologically). This hasn't changed for a very long time.
My grandparents could afford 2 children in socialism (that was not as "crude" as soviet socialism, but still), yet they were simple workers.
If the people weren't starving, they would not raise a revolt.
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic Well the people didn't raise a revolt. Moreso the ones who were truly Russian people went against these rebels. Together with the help of the lawful government they overran the rebels and restored proper order.
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@KnyazSuvorov Sure, the cossacks and jews were in the protests in the streets of Moscow...suuuuuuuuuuuuuuure.
Restored proper order? You mean by losing the war? The whites only had 500 000 troops less than the reds, and they had the allies on their side and better equipment. Yet they still lost.
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic Wait wait wait! We have been talking about 1905 with the Czar. NOT THE CIVIL WAR WITH THE WHITES AND REDS! There is a difference between that.
If you know of course.
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@KnyazSuvorov I know, but the point still remains that the Czar's soldiers shot unarmed protesters, and ever since the people decided to go for armed revolution, he was doomed.
ThiefFanatic 1 year ago
@ThiefFanatic Unarmed protesters? That is Audacious Communist Propaganda.
They were armed. They put up an armed rebellion. And to put them down a Guards regiment was called and volunteers were gathered.
You think 12,000 Elite soldiers would be called against a parading crowd?
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThiefFanatic "It's always the poor people who have the most children if they are able to (biologically)."
What is the reasoning?
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThiefFanatic
me:You call an attempt of murder on the head of the country and a revolt a peaceful protest?
you:"If you want to murder the Czar, you don't go parading in the streets."
That is not an answer. That is an attempt to avoid the necessity of giving it.
Please speak straightly.
KnyazSuvorov 1 year ago
@WWLinkMasterX Learning history from your socialist friends must be nice. To the rest of us, it's plain ignorant screeching.
You should probably analyze your beliefs a bit more, pal.
dystopianlover 1 year ago
viva rusia la heredera del imperio bizantino
davidchile007 1 year ago
What a beautiful march! What a pity the soviets used it in their (opposite) context. I´m a finn and I think that Kolchak should have accepted the offer of the Finnish army to support the attack to st.peterburg. If Kolchak just had accepted the independency of Finland we had supported the Romanov regime. 30 years after the Kolchak rejection russians saw how hard finns can be as soldiers ;)
kepardi86 1 year ago
its very nice
ThePainboi 1 year ago
Is it just me or is that bird holding a Holy Hand Grenade?
ltflak 1 year ago
i think it is one of the best if not the best ahhh can t stop listening to it
THEOFIRE99 1 year ago 7
Кто эти слова нацарапал? Блин, да что же за уродство такое? Что в Советском Союзе еще переписали? Библию???
aleksecond 1 year ago
Spasibo, dorogiye. Spasibo. Bolshe net slov.
Natashka007 1 year ago
Death to Satanic Communism! Long live the Holy Tsar and his family!!
marcusantonius90 1 year ago
@marcusantonius90 im am decendent of the TSAR s adviser ..my family fled with my great great grand father s ship and he went is germany to fight to free soviet RUSSIA
THEOFIRE99 1 year ago 15
@THEOFIRE99 and you're proud of that?
My great grandfather died on the soviet border with germany, fighting.
My Grandmother and her family lived with partisans in a forest.
Are you suggesting we did not suffer?
itsahypocriticalword 1 year ago
@itsahypocriticalword is there some were where i mention that im proud ..and even if the germans weren t coming to free germany im proud that my great grandfather fought with the thought in his head that he was fighting to free his country from a regime where his people were killed every day because they stood up for what was right ...where did i mention that russia did not suffer ...can u see that im am replying to someone im not declaring that randomly ...whats ur problem
THEOFIRE99 1 year ago
@THEOFIRE99 Hehehe, sorry man :P
itsahypocriticalword 1 year ago
@itsahypocriticalword its ok its nice to see sometimes people ho admits their are wrong u my friend are a strong man ... i love russia
THEOFIRE99 1 year ago
@THEOFIRE99 yap yap yap... are you trying to say that lebensraum plans Hitler had for EU part of USSR of leaving about 30 mil people is some kind of goodwill gesture? Just accept that your grandfarther was a fashist and from your comment volantarily. The worst kind that is.
elbabun 1 year ago
@THEOFIRE99
Moi aussi
2912Svetlana 6 months ago
@THEOFIRE99 and my grandfather was in nkvd НКУС and would have neck shot your grandad as a traitor true fact такая жыццё, нічога не зробіш...
Atomicomet 6 months ago
@Atomicomet euh ok , great !!! , do you want a thumps up ??
THEOFIRE99 6 months ago
@Atomicomet ho is the real traitor , your grandfather served a mad control freak and my great grand father served the family ho ruled there for 400 years , he did not bow down for his life , he fought even for a dead name , what did Communism bring today to our country , if nicolay had stay , the country would not have been in shit like today , fuck this fuking lenin , for his need to control , he destroyed a peice of our our beloved home for ever
THEOFIRE99 6 months ago 16
@THEOFIRE99 yes yes you all talk big these days ,but you all quite in soviet times cause you no what hapens to you. смерць ўсім здраднікам..
Atomicomet 6 months ago
@Atomicomet what u say has no sense because you are the real traitor ho converted for your life , if you want the perfect example of the of the Communist-brain-washed-citizen , here it is
THEOFIRE99 6 months ago
@THEOFIRE99 i think that not for Russian Communist revolution or Stalin , Hitler would have won the war with the Slav people and their would be no Slavs today. The Czar's Russia was too corrupt to have withstood Nazi Germany. There was a lot of Soviet crimes committed and Stalin partook in some of them , But all revolutions have injustices as well as any society of any politico or economical system.
korz53 2 months ago
@korz53 The Germans did not lead a war to destroy all slavs, they led a war to fight communism, which was the ideological enemy of nazism. They even had a lot of help by former white army soldiers and other Russian enemies of communism, and the Baltic nations saw the Germans as liberators but still led guerrilla actions against Soviets after 1945.
With the Czar, the Germans might not even have attacked Russia. And even though the Nazi regime did a lot of bad things, the Soviets were a lot worse
JarlFrank 2 months ago 3
@JarlFrank Google HITLER'S PLANS FOR EASTERN EUROPE .dac.neu.edu/holocaust/Hitlers_Plans.htm
( under = SLAV NATIONS & under = PLANS FOR THE POLISH NATION. His book Mein Kampf incriminates him on many of his crimes that he implemented after he started the wars as to implement his ideas of that book .
korz53 2 months ago
@THEOFIRE99
I don't think you understand the situation that was right before the revolution.
There was a country wide famine. The daily amount of bread the people ate was 100 grams. Lenin was an extreme patriot. He worked politically every day and had some very good ideas. But Stalin came to power and fucked it all up by being even worse than the tsar in oppressing the people. The only reason there wasn't another revolution was because he was good at making patriots, and damn good at that.
Zvesda 2 months ago
@THEOFIRE99 300 years. and the zar starved the people to death....
the sovjets did some terrible thing too but the zar was worse..
and Lenin was a great man but his "comrade" Stalin and his fellows destroyed Sovjet Union and im sorry for that.. fuck Stalin but not Lenin.. Lenin didnt liked Stalin...
2kaliban 1 month ago
@THEOFIRE99 300 years. and the zar starved the people to death....
the sovjets did some terrible thing too but the zar was worse..
and Lenin was a great man but his "comrade" Stalin and his fellows destroyed Sovjet Union and im sorry for that.. fuck Stalin but not Lenin.. Lenin didnt liked Stalin...
2kaliban 1 month ago
@2kaliban And in much less than 300 years, communists completely trashed Russia.
Did the TSAR (not zar...) cause mass malnutrition? Look at Ukraine.
The tsar didn't even discriminate against different ethnicities as the Soviets did. Look at Armenia. Peter I welcomed the Armenians with open arms, and wanted them to be welcome in the Russian Empire.
Citylife10 3 weeks ago
@Atomicomet Oh, you are from Belarus. I hope you starve to death.
Hammax 6 months ago
@Hammax why should i? i have special privlage.
Atomicomet 6 months ago
@marcusantonius90 If the Tsar is so "HOLY" Home come he murdered more people then Lenin ever did. If anything, the tsar was the AntiChrist.
MrIhatesafetymode 8 months ago
@MrIhatesafetymode If you're such a communist you are not allowed to believe in God . Saying this in the reign of Stalin would earn you a nice 10 years in Siberia .
Comrade4561 8 months ago
@Comrade4561 I'm not a Stalinist, I'm a Trotskist actually. Stalin was a murderer, Trotsky was a hero.
MrIhatesafetymode 8 months ago
@MrIhatesafetymode You claim that the Tsar killed more people then Lenin. Prove it ?Unfortunately you cannot do such a thing since that claim is ahistorical rubbish. Nicholas II executed very few of his subjects, and when he did, he usually had a good reason. Unless you were a member of a left wing terrorist organization, you had nothing to fear from the tsar.
ImperialRussianGuard 8 months ago
@ImperialRussianGuard Excuse me? Very few? Good reasons? What school did you go too!? Remember bloody sunday, the Tsar ordered the death of millions of non violent protesters! Call that a good reason? How could you support a cruel murderer like him? Who will you say killed people for good reasons next? Osama Bin Laden? Hitler? Gaddafi? All just a evil as your satanic leader known as the tsar. No wonder his supporters where sent to mental homes.
MrIhatesafetymode 8 months ago
@MrIhatesafetymode Bloody sunday was not ordered by the tsar. He was not even in St. Petersburg when it occurred. The officer who ordered the troops to fire, had no authorization from any higher authority. There is no evidence that Nicholas II ordered bloody sunday. Instead of indignant rhetoric, could you please provide some facts or statistics to back up your claims.
ImperialRussianGuard 8 months ago
@MrIhatesafetymode Not only was Nicholas II not in St. Petersburg when Bloody Sunday occurred, he personally sent letters to the families of the victims upon his return. The Tsar had nothing to do with that event, but it sadly crippled his credibility and was unjustly used by the Bolsheviks as propaganda against the Empire.
TheEnglishpaladin 8 months ago
@MrIhatesafetymode
Huh? I thought Bloody sunday was when 13 Irishmen died in N.Ireland?
what does that have to do with the Tsar?
WolfytheWolf5667 6 months ago
@ImperialRussianGuard Lenin only ordered the death of the empire because it was starving it's people
supermariobubba 7 months ago
@supermariobubba The annual agricultural output was greater than that of the growth rate of the population. Also death rates fell in the reign of Nicholas II. Why would that happen if people were starving ?
ImperialRussianGuard 7 months ago
@ImperialRussianGuard
Yes, people were starving because Nicholas II stole bread.
From Russians, his own people. Try and defend him, but I ask, where is the bread? where was their industrial plants under Nicholas? Why did he order the death of 50 Russians (i mean by crowd firing, not genocide like Stalin.)
Let's face it. Since Russia didn't like him, that means Nicholas was a dictator. And NOT the good kind like Caesar.
WolfytheWolf5667 6 months ago
@WolfytheWolf5667 You still have not been able to adress my statement. I have provided you with facts which contradict you point, however you responded with rhetoric. Very well, let me ask this question again. If so many people were dying from starvation, then why did the death rates fall ande life expectancy grow under Nicholas II ? If people were did not have enough food, logically then the statistics would show that.
ImperialRussianGuard 6 months ago
@Comrade4561 Stalin was not a Communist he was a bastardist. Lenin was jewish
supermariobubba 7 months ago 2
Boże, chroń Cara!
Secunax 1 year ago
This is the 1970s version of "Farewell of Slavianka" (Прощание славянки). Although it was written in soviet times, its lyrics bear no resemblance to those periods.
TellianGun 1 year ago 7
god save the tsar was the national anthem of imperial russia.
TheKero12345 2 years ago
@TheKero12345
God save the Queen!
God save the Kaiser!
God save the Tsar!
my friend!!!
chaplainadare1996 1 year ago
God bless the tsar and the admiral Kolchak!!!!
Long live to the christian russian people against the bolshevik monster!!!
hurra!!!!!!
mexicanendric 2 years ago
It's not tsarist military anthem. It's latest soviet remix after WW2.
LasVenture 2 years ago 4
This is real rousing stuff sung manificently!!!!
scarpiaiago 2 years ago 3
good
h2328273059 2 years ago
I like this song.
1StoryImageFigure1 2 years ago 32