The Early Show - Muammar Qaddafi dead: unconfirmed reports

[SOUPRUN01]

Does anyone hear know that George Bush senior is paedohile. It;s in The Cathy O'Brien Story [WARNING! X-RATED] or The franklyn conspiracy. They are satanic. Sacrifice children.

[buzzclick500]

"Madman" is the mentally-stunted person's term for anyone who thinks complete thoughts.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Seriously dude, the stuff you say is about the stupidest and inane shit I have heard on the web. You may as well be defending Mussolini with that airhead defense of yours. Qaddafi's actions were quite public and can be verified by multiple sources, even by other African nations that tried to deal friendly with him. Is there any facet of you that lives on this planet? Have you ever looked at a photo of the guy? Gee, maybe the media got Hitler wrong too. You're a tool. Bugger off.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Qaddafi thought complete thoughts? Like his tribute video he made Condoleeza Rice watch and listen to. I suspect you know absolutely nothing about Qaddafi. You should type less and read more, from a variety of sources. Seriously dude, I think you are the stupidest twat I have come across on all of Youtube. You deserve some sort of dumbfuck ribbon!

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Actually, it was the reverse.

[1105Chance]

Qaddafi was a nutbag that used anti-American sentiment and his nation's oil money to put people in his pocket, practice absolute totalitarian dictatorship over his country, finance international terrorism and oh yeah...buy Libya's way on to the Human Rights Committe of the UN. He bought fancy corny uniforms, visited African organizational meetings with jet planes and sadly, like Hitler, he will have people make excuses for him for years to come. To defend Qaddafi is to defend a madman. PATHETIC

[1105Chance]

Qaddafi was a stark raving lunatic. I am so happy for the Libyan people to get past this horrific, brutal dictator. This was a positive of example of the UN helping a people rid themselves of a tyrant. I am daunted that any person could be so whacked in the head as to make excuses for such an evil and deranged man. He was a menace for decades and I am glad he's gone.

[paolosilv]

The US military certainly enjoyed victories in World War Two. If you don't believe me ask Mussolini and Hitler!

[1105Chance]

@paolosilv The US was dragged into the war by being attacked by the imperialist Japanese dictator. Hitler too was proving to be a monstrous threat. We did not fight WWII for military advantage, and the fact that Stalin got Easter Europe shows that. There are graves of several hundred thousand Americans that went off to war to defend Britain, to liberate France, and to fight against one of the world's most EVIL dictators. World War II was the fault of Hitler, Mussolini, and Hirohito/followers.

[buzzclick500]

If the "news" media isn't showing something or showing it clearly, it's because something is legally preventing them from showing it. Also, they know their audience and how to ration stories out a little at a time, for maximum profit.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 At least in the US we can check a variety of news services, some liberal, some conservative, some middle of the road. It kills me how people that can only get their news from Al Jazeera love to criticize Western Media without ever having to scrutinize the propaganda that they are fed daily.

[paolosilv]

Ron Paul wants to dismantle the gov't piece by piece, but then what will protect the economy from Wall Street sharks ? Nothing. There's a reason FDR put in place these protections. The reason gov't has grown exponentially is due to the Cold War, when they had to build a nuclear deterrent. That's why we have 'secret gov't' aka 'The Nat'l Security State.' The world is no safer, with mullahs and terrorists running amok. Stop complaining.

[davd1986]

@paolosilv The world would be a lot safer if the US didn't stick its nose into other countries' problems all the time. Who is the US to tell other countries what to do? Would do and you like it if Germany, or Holland or Italy told you what to and flattened your country with hundreds if not thousands of bombs? BTW, what IS the us still doing in Germany, Japan and S. Korea 50-65 years after conflicts with those countries ended?

[paolosilv]

@davd1986 The US is trying to run the world, as per its victory in WW2, its creation of the United Nations and prior to that the League of Nations. If nations didn't fight, then the US wouldn't have gotten involved in their quarrels. The USA is there to keep the peace, it's that simple. However, we should not be looking for wars in the Mid-east where we're obviously not welcome.

[buzzclick500]

@paolosilv : The U.S.A. enjoyed no victory in World War II--it was a member of a 25-nation gang, or "co-alition", if you will. Do you find ANY flaws in the idea that the most aggressive and violent-minded nation on earth(the U.S. as a corporate entity--not the American people, per se)would have any serious interest in "keeping the peace".....?

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 You're warped. The Allied powers were not a gang. They banded together to fight off 3 very lethal militaristic, totalitarian regimes Germany, Italy, Japan, all three of which wanted to conquer their own parts of the world. Several hundred thousand Americans are buried in Europe. Americans who defended Britain, liberated France and other nations. We were attacked by the Japanese. We did not aggressively enter either world war. Further, we helped rebuild Western Germany and Japan.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 What I find flaws in is your rhetorical diatribe. Your anti-American name-calling, regardless of how vitriolic hardly makes it truth. For decades, it was the Soviet Union that was the most aggressive and militaristic government on the planet. They caused trouble all over the planet, but now that they are no longer the USSR, it's easy to just pretend they played no role in the history of the decades after World War II. There are a plethora of cases of the US keeping the peace. Jerk.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : I happen to BE an American--I simply do not trust the people who took power over my government(public servant staff)on Thanksgiving weekend of 1963. It's not over, and it will NOT BE over, until that situation is addressed and corrected. As for being a "jerk" that is more of a title of respect than an insult these days.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 I don't underestimate the threat of powerful multi-national corporations and the threats they pose. Americans are already suffering from them. But they are not unique to America, and most of them don't really operate with any concern about the welfare of the United States. In truth, greed runs the show. Whether it is brutal dictators, royal families, theocratic totalitarianism, the truth is that the money for oil is not trickling down to the people. THEY ARE ALL GUILTY.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 I don't worry about videos. These dictators all had look alikes (practiced since Emperor Nero in ancient Rome). What I notice is that there is no more out of the evil mouth of Bin Laden, there is no more out of the mouth of Hussein, we won't ever hear from Qaddafi again. That's all I care about. Now if only his brainwashed sheep would stop killing their own countrymen and help Libya pull itself together with a democratic government and not some psycho egomaniac cliche dictator.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : So, do you have some specific individual in mind who you feel would best represent the common interests of the so-called "civilized world"? Yourself, perhaps?

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Again with worthless rhetoric. The tool of the weak-minded.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Actually, rhetoric is a tool of the STRONG-minded, but then, you're already aware of that....

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 What I am aware of is that you are probably one of the biggest flakes I have had the laugh of reading on Youtube. If anyone sounds like some sheep that came across a large supply of propaganda it's you. Anyone that has such a dumbass non-factual and non-historical views of WWII as you do doesn't really deserve the energy I have spent responding to your nitwit airhead comments. I am no big government supporter. But I know that Americans are much better people than you describe. Jerk

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : O.k., well, thank you for your input, and please have a pleasant night. Tomorrow's a new day.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 I am well aware that you are an American. So what? You're just one of the flakey ones that overfocuses on the mistakes of the US while being silent about the larger menaces and evils that have governed people throughout history in this world. Go read your Ron Paul crap, giving him your money, while he votes for conservative legislation like a little George W. Bush puppet. Strange you have little criticism for the rest of this crazy planet or their governments. Very transparent.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Yes, o.k., well, have a Valium and a pleasant night. Thank you again.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 You see? You have nothing substantive to say. Just silly quips that don't exactly burn the skin, although a valium sounds like a good idea. Reading twits like you after a while can make someone tense. A post about Qaddafi and you're prattling on about FDR. I still think it's pathetic. But it is time to stop. I said what I had to say.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Whew.

[1105Chance]

@paolosilv The US is not trying to run the world, but we do involve ourselves in world affairs mostly to encourage stability (although we've gone about that via several major mistakes). The fact is that if there were good leadership to support, we would be supporting it. Unfortunately, we are trapped in choosing the lesser of two evils over and over again because leadership in the Middle East and Africa is SHIT. Africans raping 450,000 Congolese women. Not our fault.

[1105Chance]

@paolosilv The mere fact that you would even make excuses for someone like Qaddafi robs you of any integrity or even signs of common sense. If someone is so in love with their own ideology that they make excuses for an obvious headcase and tyrant like Qaddafi, just tells me your head isn't screwed on very tight and I am not even interested in listening to your anti-Western criticism since what you turn a blind eye to is far, far worse. You may as well be defending Mussolini.

[paolosilv]

@1105Chance I am not defending Qaddafi. But I don't believe that the US had an inherent right to overthrow him through NATO.

[1105Chance]

@paolosilv The US does not run NATO. They all have votes and have rejected US proposals in the past. So it is correct both technically and honestly to say that NATO helped Libyan rebels overthrow a dictator. NATO is not a puppet organization for the US. Britain, France, Germany, others...they all have their own opinions whether supportive or not. It was not just the US that wanted to see Qaddafi ousted. There is usually uncertainty after a dictator is deposed so it's worrisome, but Q had to go.

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 The world would not be safer. It would be a destabilized mess. People like you make these sweeping comments that have actually no fact to them, just your own "gut feeling". Hussein warred with Iran for what? 8 years or so? They invaded Kuwait, Hussein used chemical weapons on Iranians and his own people. People like you turn a blind eye to absolute NUTCASE egomaniacs like Qaddafi and Hussein (both of which we put up with for decades). You're a hypocrite of the highest order.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Guess who has absolutely no idea what they're talking about right now.....?

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Right. 20,000 gays hung publicly in Iran since Khomeini, but I don't know what I am talking about. You refer to the Allied forces of WWII as a "gang". Clearly, YOU have no idea what you are talking about, and there's nothing that anyone could say to clarify that to you. You'll simply go through life clueless and spouting off criticisms of Americans, except of course for yourself. I guess you need that. It makes you feel special.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : O.k., so you're gay--thanks for the info. Good night.

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 Funny how you single out the US, when even other anti-Western critics now include NATO in their complaints. Both Germany and France played a role in liberating Libya, supporting Islamic people btw. Holland's a mess now from liberal immigration laws. It's a mess. Islamics never take responsibility to their shitty governments, their barbaric customs (hanging 20,000 gays in Iran since Khomeini) but you have the nerve to project all of the violence on Americans FALSELY. Axe-grinding dolt.

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 Do you even realize how many nations ASK even demand for US involvement. We didn't help bring about peace in Bosnia? Really? We didn't help stop genocide against Muslims in Eastern Europe? You hypocrite! We had to fight Germany and Japan and we helped rebuild both warring nations. Japan had more modern factories than our own. We do keep bases there, mostly because of the former Soviet Union which seems every bit as shady under Putin. If the US stayed to itself, we would be criticized.

[davd1986]

@1105Chance No, you didn't bring peace Bosnia. First of all, you put in Milosevic the Nationalist in power in the late 90's as a puppet against the Yugoslavian government, which totally fucked the country up in more ways than one, as evidenced in the 1990's...Then, when you saw that he had no control and went too far, you came in like wolves to poach on the lambs and put in thousands of soldiers. Same thing with Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. Who is being Shady? Putin!?! LOL. Yeah...No...

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 I would acknowledge that Putin has actually managed to improve the Russian economy very impressively. But the anti-Nato rhetoric is the same old song and dance that the Soviet Union practiced for decades and it's very transparent. With people like you, there is absolutely no US action that would not go uncriticized. We get criticized for not getting involved, we get criticized if we do. But the people that criticize are suspiciously and OVERTLY one-sided. Biased prattle.

[davd1986]

@1105Chance Did I say ANYTHING regarding the Soviet Union? Nope. You would be pleasently surprised to see and hear how many Europeans, Easter and/or Western are opposed to what NATO and the US is doing in the Middle East and pretty much anywhere it feels like. People are one sided because people are seeing how hypocritical and how dangerous globalization is. Bombing the shit out of countries to get money and oil in disguise of 'democracy!?' LOL, GTFO.

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 You can tell yourself that "all of these people agree with you" but in reality, you're just turning a blind eye to a dictator who was a madman. As for your overgeneralizations of world events. There are plenty of nations that are anti-US or anti-Western who have not had the "shit bombed out of them" to get their oil. If the US and NATO wanted to roll like that, they would have far more influence than they presently do. A post about Qaddafi and most of you are hear to bitch. Boring.

[davd1986]

@1105Chance Umm, they do actually have that influence. Were you just born yesterday or were you keeping Brendan Fraser company in the bomb shelter for 30 years?

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 Tired rhetorical putdowns. Really? That's the best you can do? Your comment is too stupid to even offer serious response, which is, I suspect your strategy since you obviously had nothing substantive to say. If anyone sounds as if they were born yesterday it's you. You're just another tired, cliche anti-American windbag, and with your last comment you just got stupid and boring. Be a good little rebel and bugger off now. You're boring and accomplishing nothing.

[davd1986]

@1105Chance Umad bro?

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 Honestly David, had the conversation been more civilized there would probably be things that i agree with or concede, but there would be things that I wouldn't. I really do try to look at world conflicts from various sides because international politics are COMPLEX. I don't care too much for rhetoric, and the US aside, I think that Qaddafi was a nutcase, so I would have problems taking anyone seriously who made excuses for him. Besides, I have a life to attend to. Peace.

[davd1986]

@1105Chance My name isn't "David." I recognize how complex politics are, and how complex the world is. Afterall, there are almost 7 billion people living in it, almost 7,000 living languages, every country is built differently, every society has its positives and negatives, politicians are corrupt just about everywhere, money is being used illegally every which way possible, earth is being polluted for no reason, amount of nuclear weapons is rising, people are angry with banks, politicians...

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 Agreed. But greed and corruption are a global reality. Some people like to pretend that there are these dictatorial "heroes" and they aren't heroes at all. They are villains. I think the world is a very sad place sometimes and if you follow it too closely it just leads to dread. There's only so much we can do as people, whether through church contributions, or political groups. But this Youtube nonsense accomplishes nothing. I only partake if I had too much caffeine.

[davd1986]

@1105Chance And unfortunately it seems that people have no say in it. Either that or way too few of us are brave enough to stand up and protest. As far as Gaddafi is concerned, not too long ago he was shaking hands and hugging western leaders such as Tony Blair, Nicholas Sarkozy and Silvio Berlusconi. We shouldn't be making excuses for Gaddafi, but on the other hand, western leaders aren't exactly mother teresa either. Waging war for oil and power and risking millions of lives is disgusting.

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 I don't really put my faith in any government, but OBVIOUS egomaniacal dictators are low on my list. Qaddafi was a scumbag and there's nothing you can say to convince me otherwise, nor could you correctly deny it factually.

You're still making excuses for Qaddafi as if he was genuine. In reality he was a pain in the ass to the world and we had to put up with his crazy ass and support for terrorism for decades. That's just fact. No use going round about it.

[davd1986]

@1105Chance I am not making excuses for anybody, the excuses are made by the US government of unleashing terror on others and using the exuse of a 'dictator' destroying his people. He was very well received by Africa and much of the Middle East. While I feel ousting him was a good idea, the way it was handled was poor, and do you know who is in power now? Islamic miltants.

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 Technically it was NATO. Yes, you are making excuses. Most Islamic's are militant. No news there. Qaddafi's dictatorship thrived off of anti-American sentiment. In one breath you are saying you believe he should be ousted and in another breath you are rambling about how "well-received" he was. You haven't given one reason why YOU believe he should be ousted. There must be some reason for you to make that statement, no?

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 Criticism is easy. You say he should have been ousted....WHY? WHEN do you think he should have been ousted? HOW do you think he should be ousted? I am sure with your easy criticisms will come mind-numbingly easy answers with very little real world application. You're Swiss. You're supposed to be neutral. So why not drop the subject and be neutral...like WWII.

[1105Chance]

@davd1986 The US stayed in Germany because of the divide with the Soviet Union. The same could be said about our base in Japan. Both nations are our allies. Both feared invasion by the Soviets. The Cold War lasted decades so you seem to be leaving out a lot of history. As for South Korea, another ally, they have North Korea at their gates who have a totalitarian madman at the helm and a nuclear weapons program. Are you forgetting the Cuban missile crisis? You seem one-sided.

[buzzclick500]

@paolosilv : F.D.R.was a bigger war criminal than he made others out to be.  He swore he "would not send Americans into war," while planning all the while to do exactly the opposite. Only a man who assumes his electorate(and correctly, sadly)to be stupid would pull such a stunt.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 I am convinced that you must be sloppily self-taught at history and world politics. Exactly what "war crimes" did FDR commit, and given the world was plagued by the likes of Hitler, Mussolini, Hirohito, and Stalin, the mere fact that you would waste time criticizing FDR just shows that you have an axe to grind about the US, viewing them (selective perception) in the worst light possible, while turning a blind eye to the true tyrants of that era. Simplistic, erroneous rhetoric.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : America needs a "Hitler" right now like a person dying of thirst in the desert needs a drink of cool water. We have allowed things to become absolutely ridiculous in this country.

[1105Chance]

@paolosilv Ron Paul sells his books of ideology and makes good money doing so. In reality, however, it's just ideology with no real world application. That's why, for the most part, he is really just an ultra-conservatives since he ends up voting like any conservative Republican. His fans only criticize government and live in a delusional state that in this world we could get by with scarcely any government. In reality, it would be a disaster. It's just delusional thinking that will never happen

[michaelsterling37]

Look at all the simpleminded sheep. You like propaganda?

[toddy1968]

Ron Paul is a silly, idealistic simpleton. But I really do hope we get some real "anti government" guy in office soon—just to shut you guys up forever with their ruination of America. Maybe then we can get onto addressing the real problems we face instead of this Utopian idea of a 18th century America. Idiots.

[michaelsterling37]

@toddy1968 Yea, to hell with Constitution, and Bill of Rights!!! Why have Freedom.

[buzzclick500]

@toddy1968 : Realistically, if our government obeyed our Constitution, most of us wouldn't even know who our president IS; we wouldn't NEED to. Elections would be in the news for a month or so, and that would be it.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Idealistic blather with no real connection to reality.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : I take it that you're rather new to the Internet....? You exhibit the passion of the newcomer.....

[toddy1968]

Shut your "tea baggin" holes. Your obviously too young and too dumb to understand the stupidity in what you say.

[VirtualMuseumGroup]

2 questions:

1: If they can show Qaddafi dead and replay over and over the death of 3000 Americans on the 10 year anniversary of 911, Why can we not see the picture of Usama Bin Laden

2: With technology as advanced as it is, why are we given such a crappy image, what did you film this with, a Toothbrush?

[buzzclick500]

Americans live in a comic-book world in which OUR government is right and true, and has all the answers we want, and the solid, purposeful leaders of other governments are dictators. We actually think our government loves us and cares about us. When we wake up, whew; it'll make the French Revolution look a kindergarten playground skirmish. We're traveling through time...

[louie540x]

@buzzclick500

I don't know any American who believes that. No one likes the government.

[buzzclick500]

@louie540x : I don't DISlike the government, I simply see them as our public servant staff. Granted, it's an unusual point of view, but I'd certainly like to see it become widespread. ;])

[louie540x]

@buzzclick500

I don't completely find them untrustworthy either, but that doesn't mean I don't think they are sell outs to big business and the media. If we ever get to the point where everyone does trust the government, that would be great. They are suppose to be serving us like you said because that's their job.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Every one of your posts is idiotic. There are so many Americans each with different beliefs so the fact that you would even try to stereotype us is moronic to start with. Secondly, I am 48, educated, and I have never met the type of people you describe. The US has made a lot of mistakes, primarily supporting what they considered the lesser of two evils, but all in all we are a civilized nation with a HUGE percentage of people donating money to a plethora of charities to try to help

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Yes, well, I've conversed with communists and socialists before, on the belief that ANYONE is capable of learning something good. At the present time, America is not CLOSE to being a civilized nation--I'm not completely sure that's a bad thing.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 "Yes, well, I've conversed with communists and socialists before, on the belief that ANYONE is capable of learning something good. At the present time, America is not CLOSE to being a civilized nation--I'm not completely sure that's a bad thing." This is prattle! Seriously dude. Mindless, stupid, corny prattle.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 In reality, most Americans think our presidential choices are dismal, that multi-national corporations have sold us out and robbed us of tax credits and jobs, that we have a faulty health insurance system. We worry about mortgages, jobs, healthcare and getting through life. We have friends and relatives with health problems. we don't live in a comic book world. Perhaps you do. You certainly sound as if you were writing one...

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Have you MET Qaddafi in person? I'm just curious, because it can be really surprising to discover that someone can be totally different than the image cooked up against them by the popular media, which happens to be as corrupt and slanted as all get-out(and we all KNOW who produces it, no mystery there). I don't like to judge people by their manufactured image--it's stupid and breeds antisocial attitudes about people WE don't even know a thing about.

[buzzclick500]

We haven't been told the truth about ANYTHING for decades, and that's o.k., because when the Big One comes down, all the arguments, suspicions and speculations will be vaporized in a microsecond. That's the guaranteed future of man. And we have NO idea when--that's enough to make ME behave myself....

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 "When the Big One comes down?" You sound like you should be hiding in a bomb shelter reading conspiracy theory magazines. You're just saying stupid RHETORIC. You don't say anything substantive, you don't have anything to offer except support of some hypocrite like Ron Paul. What a mess? Ron Paul says he's a libertarian but he just votes ultra-conservative since there is no libertarian legislation. Ron Paul is a fad with no real world application.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Ron Paul is about as real as people get, and you're very much aware of that, and apparently don't like it; not much to add to that.

[Sijil17]

they should atleast have some respect for the dead #barbaric

[buzzclick500]

@Sijil17 : Americans, by and large, lost touch with our finer emotions and sensitivities long ago. Someone's trained us to be a society of dull-witted warriors. They'll burn, and those of us who follow them will burn.

[Sijil17]

@buzzclick500 he was bad...but cmon..dragging his body..kicking spitting etc....its just sickenning...i totally agree with you

[buzzclick500]

@Sijil17 : Yeah, we say "He was bad," because a lot of us are addicted to the idea that our own "news" media tells us the truth. Local news agencies in other nations tell THEIR people about our own dictatorial presidents--because OUR "news" works hand-in-hand WITH our government. America is actually the EASIEST nation to dictate to, because we're young and naive to the world's political situation.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Again with sweeping melodramatic anti-American statements. Silly apocalyptic vague predictions. You obviously obsess on how much you dislike Americans and isn't it amusing how you make us all sound stupid and out of touch, except of course for you! How convenient and special for you! I think you would find it impossible to view any issue involving the US OBJECTIVELY. You use selective perception and over-generalized thinking.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Have I yet mentioned that I AM an American.....?

[fahadali2018]

Shut up all you fuckers ........ how he was terrorist ....... NATO came to Libya and killed thousand of people just to occupied oil and wealth..... fuck you america and zoinest

[1105Chance]

@fahadali2018 We did not occupy Libya. It's government is fundamentalist Moslem. Libya ended up admitting that it was involved in causing the crash of a Pan Am flight. They also funded terrorist bombings in Germany and France. He also caused a lot of trouble in Rwanda. NATO helped free Libya of a dictator. They have the right to form their own government, and I am telling you right now it will still be anti-Western. Learn to spell "Zionist" properly. You sound stupid and brainwashed.

[JRAMACARTEL]

america is a bunch of terrorist yet no one is complaining!!

[userbiasa]

US Corporate + Government = New Fascism...

[userbiasa]

welcome to the new world of Europe - US Colonialism...

[AZerTurke]

how can you be happy for someone's death?!

[usarocker16]

@AZerTurke He was a terrorist how can you not be happy? I say YA HE DEAD PARTY TIME!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA

[whaddupmf]

@AZerTurke : I'm sure that millions were happy at the news of the death of Hitler and Stalin. It's OK to be happy at the news of the death of dictators who murdered their own people and others. You're a confused individual.

[AZerTurke]

@whaddupmf Even if he was a dictator, beating and then killing people shows high level of democracy, right?

[1105Chance]

@AZerTurke It's easy to be happy over the death of deranged, brutal dictators. Hitler, Qaddafi, Stalin...they are all the same. Warped in the head egomaniacs that cause suffering and promote violence and conflict. Qaddafi was scum, and anyone that tries to even defend scum like that isn't worth talking to.

[AZerTurke]

@1105Chance You talk as you knew his family..

[1105Chance]

@AZerTurke People that knew his family knew they were scum too. Check out the Youtube video of the maid that Qaddafi's sister had sadistically burned. What does it take? Some neon sign pointing "BLATANT DICTATOR" at him? Have you even bothered to look at the photos of him with his ridiculous "uniforms", have you read about how he would show up at African organizational meetings with jet fighters flying overhead? THE MAN WAS A NUTCASE! YOU SOUND AS IF YOU AREN"T EVEN LIVING IN THE REAL WORLD.

[AZerTurke]

@1105Chance Hello Wake up This is War.. American TV won't Show fairy movies and say that their enemy is really good man even if it's true. even if he was dictator, he was a person like each of us. in this video I see a bunch of animals killing a person.

[whaddupmf]

Qaddafi is DEAD !!!!! YESSSSSSSSSSSS. I am toasting this special occasion !!! Down with dictators/oppressors of the people.

[Tryndets]

@whaddupmf You obviously prefer terrorists from the National Transitional Council like Abdelhakim Belhaj))) And you must be one of those brainwashed wonders who beleives in Bin Laden's death on 2 May 2011)))

[whaddupmf]

@Tryndets : Yes, Bin Laden is dead.......... I haven't heard of anything coming from his mouth in the last few months, have you??? I'm excited that Qaddafi is DEAD. There is hope for a new and free Libya. The Libyan people are free to decide their own future and I believe that they will make the right choices.

[Tryndets]

@whaddupmf Actually I meant Bin Laden had died long before the fairy tale media planted on 2 May.

As for Lybian future - Lybians are heading for mass scale poverishment, rise in crime, increase in corrupton, murderous civil discords and other beauties of democracy that USA brings. Lybians will vote properly for organized criminal groups called "parties". Fools will vote for intriguers... Lybia will be ruled by NATO marrionettes and its natural resourses (oil, water) will belong to the West.

[buzzclick500]

@Tryndets : If it weren't so dangerous for honest people at the present time, I'd suggest that YOU run for president. I'd settle for Ron Paul, if we can somehow guarantee his safety.

[louie540x]

@buzzclick500

Btw, I'm trying to not come off as an asshole or anything. I was just giving my 2 cents.

Just so you know.

[Tryndets]

@buzzclick500 ))) Ron Paul talks one language with the majority, that's his good point. In other peoples sight the USA of nowadays is a grand omnivorous dragon, this engenders hatred. Ron Paul is another America's image, thereis that in him which commands respect and arouses desire to socialise.

[buzzclick500]

@Tryndets : You said it well, and in a very few words.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 You really just sound like a cliche, self-loathing American who convinces himself he's superior with sloppy thinking, bad history, flakey perspectives and it doesn't surprise me that you would like Ron Paul. He makes tons of money on his books of ideology, but in real life, he just ends up voting for the ultra-conservatives, the very people you seem to have an issue with. Your type always feel good with easy rhetorical criticisms. You say nothing substantive.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : Yes, well, o.k., thank you for your input. Hopefully, your passion will fade as the effect of the crack winds down, and you become more relaxed.

[1105Chance]

@buzzclick500 Crack? Just another stupid ass comment from a stupid ass. The more you type the more you demonstrate how intellectually impotent you are.

[buzzclick500]

@1105Chance : I think it may have somehow escaped your notice that I've given up on you as a conversational partner....

[1105Chance]

@Tryndets Ron Paul is a Libertarian which is about as opposite of socialism as you can get, so you don't even know what you're talking about. Secondly, although Paul advocates withdrawal from world affairs, he actually always votes ultra-conservative, thus being a supporter of the far right conservatives, despite what he writes in his books. He makes money off of ideology, but he is a puppet for the far right conservatives.

[1105Chance]

@Tryndets Fundamentalist Islam has a hold over the Middle East, not NATO. NATO couldn't get a handle on the situation if they tried. That's the absurdity of people with your anti-Western views. You try to make Western nations sound as if they still have all of this control over the Middle East, when Iraq, Iran, Libya and a host of other troubled nations clearly demonstrates that they do not. But you wouldn't dare accept any of the blame on the people there.

[1105Chance]

@Tryndets Nato supported ISLAMIC rebels without knowing what kind of government or stance they will take. For all they know, they will be no more favorable to the West. But Qaddafi was insane and getting worse each year. It was worth a shot to support the freedom of the Libyan people from that nutcase. Libya is free to choose its own government, practice sharia law. The odds are that regardless of how anti-American they may end up being, they couldn't be worse than crazed Qaddafi.

[1105Chance]

@Tryndets Some nations have gotten past dictators (Germany after Hitler, Italy after Mussolini) but other nations don't fare as well. To remove a dictator leaves a vacuum. You sound as if you are saying it's better to keep a dictator than practice responsible CHANGE. Libya's new government will be fundamentalist moslems, they will continue to be anti-American and we will not "Get" their national resources. You're simply blathering cliche anti-American hatred. All emotion with no fact.

[kingston0708]

whats with her eyes? they are all over the place.